DOCSLIB.ORG

Social Ecology After Bookchin.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Social Ecology After Bookchin.Pdf Social Ecology after Bookcliin Edited by Andrew Light Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2019 with funding from Kahle/Austin Foundation https://archive.org/details/socialecologyaftOOOOunse SOCIAL ECOLOGY AFTER BOOKCHIN DEMOCRACY AND ECOLOGY A Guilford Series Published in conjunction with the Center for Political Ecology JAMES O'CONNOR Series Editor SOCIAL ECOLOGY AFTER BOOKCHIN Andrew Light, Editor THE STRUGGLE FOR ECOLOGICAL DEMOCRACY ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE MOVEMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES Daniel Faber, Editor NATURAL CAUSES ESSAYS IN ECOLOGICAL MARXISM James O’Connor WORK, HEALTH, AND ENVIRONMENT OLD PROBLEMS, NEW SOLUTIONS Charles Levenstein and John Wooding, Editors THE GREENING OF MARXISM Ted Benton, Editor MINDING NATURE THE PHILOSOPHERS OF ECOLOGY David Macauley, Editor GREEN PRODUCTION TOWARD AN ENVIRONMENTAL RATIONALITY Enrique Leff IS CAPITALISM SUSTAINABLE? POLITICAL ECONOMY AND THE POLITICS OF ECOLOGY Martin O’Connor, Editor Social Ecology after Bookchin EDITED BY Andrew Light ?■" "fftomai I Bata libra: TRENT UNIVERSITr PFTMQROUGH, ONTARIO THE GUILFORD PRESS New York London © 1998 The Guilford Press A Division of Guilford Publications, Inc. 72 Spring Street, New York, NY 10012 http://www.guilford.com All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher. Printed in the United States of America This book is printed on acid-free paper. Last digit is print number: 987654321 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Social ecology after Bookchin / edited by Andrew Light, p. cm.—(Democracy and ecology) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-57230-379-4 1. Bookchin, Murray, 1921- 2. Social ecology. I. Light, Andrew, 1966- . II. Series. HM206.S55 1998 304.2—dc21 98-35447 For my friends and colleagues at The University of Montana. Introduction to the Democracy and Ecology Series This book series titled “Democracy and Ecology” is a contribution to the debates on the future of the global environment and “free market economy” and the prospects of radical green and democratic move¬ ments in the world today. While some call the post-Cold War period the “end of history,” others sense that we may be living at its begin¬ ning. These scholars and activists believe that the seemingly all- powerful and reified world of global capital is creating more economic, social, political, and ecological problems than the world’s ruling and political classes are able to resolve. There is a feeling that we are living through a general crisis, a turning point or divide that will create great dangers, and also opportunities for a nonexploitative, socially just, democratic ecological society. Many think that our species is learning how to regulate the relationship that we have with ourselves and the rest of nature in ways that defend ecological values and sensibilities, as well as right the exploitation and injustice that disfigure the present world order. All are asking hard questions about what went wrong with the worlds that global capitalism and state socialism made, and about the kind of life that might be rebuilt from the wreckage of ecol¬ ogically and socially bankrupt ways of working and living. The “De¬ mocracy and Ecology” series rehearses these and related questions, poses new ones, and tries to respond to them, if only tentatively and provisionally, because the stakes are so high, and since “time-honored slogans and time-worn formulae” have become part of the problem. James O’Connor Series Editor VII Acknowledgments This volume was a long time in coming, certainly too long. It originally began as an idea for a jointly authored book on Murray Bookchin’s so¬ cial ecology five years ago, to be penned by myself, Jay Moore, Jim O’Connor, and Alan Rudy. Many problems in orchestrating that vol¬ ume convinced us to abandon the project, and so it evolved into the present anthology. Over the years since then, through many false starts and long delays, several prospective authors have come into and later left the volume; all of them have made some sort of mark by helping me to think through what sort of book this should be. Accordingly, I wish to thank Jay Moore, Stanley Aronowitz, Ynestra King, Steve Best, Elizabeth Carlassare, and especially, Enrique Leff, for their assistance along the way. To the rest of the authors remaining in this volume, I thank them for their perseverance, dedication, and most of all, pa¬ tience. Other friends in environmental philosophy were always there to encourage the continuation of the process, especially Deane Curtin, An¬ drew Feenberg, Greta Gaard, and my dear friend and sometime col¬ laborator, Eric Katz. I also owe special thanks to Jim O’Connor, editor of the “Democ¬ racy and Ecology” series, Barbara Laurence, Managing Editor of Capi¬ talism, Nature, Socialism, and Peter Wissoker, my editor and friend at The Guilford Press. Jim and Barbara expressed remarkable confidence in my being able to put this volume together, and Peter never failed in his ongoing support for the idea of the book. Jim’s intellectual rigor, dedication, generosity, and character are always an inspiration. I may be mistaken in assuming that he, Barbara, and Peter never gave up hope that this volume would finally get done. In any event, their en¬ couragement was always there, and I thank them for it. IX X Acknowledgments I have dedicated this collection to my friends and colleagues at The University of Montana. It was there, during my all too short stay as a member of the philosophy department, that I finally found the time to finish this volume. For the first time in my nomadic aca¬ demic career I felt at home, and surely this sense of being in place, if only for a brief time, made it possible for me to accomplish much. Of those in Missoula, I thank all of my colleagues in the philosophy department and elsewhere, especially Barbara Andrew, Irene Appel- baum, Lauren Bartlett, Albert Borgmann, Bill Chaloupka, Dan Flores, Carl Heine, Bruce Milem, Ron Perrin, Val Plumwood, and Deborah Slicer. A very singular thanks goes to my assistant at Montana, David Roberts, who never failed to make my working days more en¬ joyable and productive. Finally, my biggest debts of gratitude go to two very different people, both of whom have been by my side in various ways since the beginning of this process. First, to Dorit Naaman, my partner for the last four years, and constant interlocutor on all projects, both great and small. Dorit’s dedication to her own work continues to be an inspiration for me with mine. Second, to Murray Bookchin, who may indeed not welcome this collection but whom I hope realizes the honor we do him when we continue to press on and be inspired by his work and presence. Bookchin has already commented in an ap¬ parent reference to this volume prior to its publication that it is a “joint endeavor of Marxists, neo-Marxists, and deep ecologists” de¬ signed to denounce his work, and whose purpose “is to dimmish the anarchist tendency in the ecology movement.”1 I hope that the chari¬ table reader of this collection will see that it is not designed to “de¬ nounce” Bookchin or anarchism in general. (Nor should the papers in the volume be taken as a “joint endeavor” by the particular authors of the various chapters. Indeed, each author is responsible for the content of his or her own contribution and that only.) The purpose of this volume is to provide more and less supportive cri¬ tiques and extensions of and challenges to social ecology, toward the goal of enriching the overall development of the broad array of views represented as political ecology. Certainly this task requires analysis of Bookchin’s work, as that work is practically coextensive with the development of social ecology as we know it today. Even though we are all in some ways critical of his work, I hope that no I. Murray Bookchin, “Whither Marxism? A Reply to Recent Anarchist Critics,” avail¬ able at http://www.pitzer.edu/dward/Anarchist_Archives/bookchm/whither.html, footnote 72, paragraph 4. 1 his article is forthcoming in Bookchin’s Anarchism, Marxism, and the Future of the Left (San Francisco and Edinburgh: AK Press, 1998). Acknowledgments XI reader will come away from this volume thinking that a social ecol¬ ogy after Bookchin means a social ecology without Bookchin. Book- chin, more than he may realize, has pressed us all to move forward and continue the conversation over his ideas into the next century whether we align ourselves in his camp or not. Surely, no author could ask for a greater tribute. Andrew Light Missoula, Montana May 1998 Contents INTRODUCTION Bookchin as/and Social Ecology Andrew Light PART I DIALECTICS AND ETHICS CHAPTER 1 Negating Bookchin Joel Kovel CHAPTER 2 Divining Evolution and Respecting Evolution Robyn Eckersley CHAPTER 3 Ethics and Directionality in Nature Glenn A. Albrecht CHAPTER 4 Social Ecology and Reproductive Freedom: A Feminist Perspective Regina Cochrane PART II POLITICS AND MATERIAL CULTURE CHAPTER 5 Municipal Dreams: A Social Ecological Critique of Bookchin’s Politics John Clark XIV Contents CHAPTER 6 Bookchin’s Ecocommunity as Ecotopia: 192 A Constructive Critique Adolf G. Gundersen CHAPTER 7 Social Ecology and the Problem of Technology 211 David Watson CHAPTER 8 “ ‘Small’ Is Neither Beautiful nor Ugly; It Is Merely 240 Small”: Technology and the Future of Social Ecology Eric Stowe Higgs PART III HISTORICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND COMPARISONS CHAPTER 9 Ecology and Anthropology in the Work of Murray 265 Bookchin: Problems of Theory and Evidence Alan P. Rudy CHAPTER 10 Evolution and Revolution: The Ecological Anarchism 298 of Kropotkin and Bookchin David Macauley CHAPTER 11 Reconsidering Bookchin and Marcuse as Environmental 343 Materialists: Toward an Evolving Social Ecology Andrew Light !ndex 385 Contributors 399 Introduction Bookchin as/and Social Ecology ANDREW LIGHT In 1993 I unwittingly stepped onto a battlefield.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identity Evropa
    AGAINST IDENTITY EVROPA AGAINST THE ALT RIGHT Big Nazi On Campus May 15, 2016 ON FRIDAY, May 6th, white nationalist Richard Spencer, President and director of National Policy Institute (NPI), (a think tank aimed at mil- lennials and educated adults that puts on conferences), and head of its publishing arm Washington Summit Publishers, arrived just before 3pm at UC Berkeley. Encircled by three other white nationalists, Spen- cer walked from the street through several corridors and hallways until finally making his way to Sproul Plaza where a group of other supporters had already gathered and started to live-stream and hold signs. In doing so, Spencer was stepping out of the world of paid con- ferences and weekly podcasts and into the terrain of street activism. Having announced the event on his twitter 48 hours before hand and working with Red Ice Radio, a live-streaming and in home studio run by a white nationalist married couple, the National Policy Institute along with Identity Europa, the youth wing of the American Freedom Party, (a key organizer for ANP is David Duke’s former right-hand man, Jamie Kelso), a Neo-Nazi formation, was working to create a “virtual rally.” The event itself was billed as a “Safe Space” to talk about race in America, using language common among left-wing, ac- tivist, and anarchist spaces. Before the rally even began, Spencer’s fellow white nationalists at Red Ice were already playing up what they imagined was going to happen that day. “Here is is, the birth of the free speech movement, and all of these liberals aren’t going to be able to stand white people talking about race,” they stated, (as if somehow Further resources Berkeley was devoid of white people doing just that).
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Jacques Ellul, Martin Heidegger and Simone Weil on George Grant's Changing Understanding of Technology
    GEORGE GRANT'S CHANGING UNDERSTANDING OF TECHNOLOGY THE INFLUENCE OF JACQUES ELLUL, MARTIN HEIDEGGER AND SIMONE WEIL ON GEORGE GRANT'S CHANGING UNDERSTANDING OF TECHNOLOGY By DAYTON ANDREW MUNCASTER, B.A., M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School ofGraduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment ofthe Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University Copyright by Andrew Muncaster, January 2008 DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2008) McMaster University (Religious Studies) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: The Influence of Jacques Ellul, Martin Heidegger and Simone Weil on George Grant's Changing Understanding of Technology. AUTHOR: Andrew Muncaster, B.A., M.A. (Wilfrid Laurier University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Zdravko Planinc NUMBER OF PAGES: v, 211 11 Abstract The dissertation considers the influence of Jacques Ellul, Martin Heidegger, and Simone Weil on Grant's understanding of technology. Chapters One and Two analyze Ellul's influence on Grant, while Chapter Three examines Heidegger's influence on Grant's understanding of technology. Chapter Four examines the consequences of Grant's ambiguous evaluation of Ellul and Heidegger. Grant's unwillingness to entirely accept either account of technology leads to a tension in which aspects of Ellul 's account of technology are held simultaneously with elements of Heidegger's account. As a way to overcome the tension between these explanations, Grant becomes open to gnostic elements in Weil's theology, which manifest themselves in radical dualism and esoteric wisdom. The purpose of the dissertation is to clarify the significance of Ellul for Grant's thought. Scholars often overlook the extent of Ellul's contribution for Grant's account of technology, particularly in Grant's refinement of concepts such as technological necessity and his critique of liberal ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • THE THOREAU SOCIETY 75Th Anniversary Annual Gathering, July 6-10, 2016
    THE THOREAU SOCIETY 75th Anniversary Annual Gathering, July 6-10, 2016 Finding the Extraordinary in the Ordinary: Henry D. Thoreau as Proto-ecologist, Reformer, and Visionary THOREAU SOCIETY STAFF ANNUAL GATHERING STAFF Michael J. Frederick, Executive Director Clarissa Eaton, Director of Registration Chynna Lemire, Business Manager Rachel Gulick, Registration Coordinator Magdalena Bermudez, Annual Gathering Coordinator Delia Frederick, Registration Assistant Jon Fadiman, Shop Supervisor Finley Janes, Director of Hospitality Richard Smith, Historian Rhana Tabrizi, Audio-Visual Technician Victor Curran, Shop Associate William Bermudez, Audio-Visual Technician HONORARY ADVISOR Edward O. Wilson Harrison A. Glasgow Manassas, VA BOARD OF DIRECTORS Michael Schleifer, CPA Allen Harding Brooklyn, New York Matamoras, PA President Ronald Hoag, PhD Robert Clarke Grimesland, NC Woodbury, CT Treasurer Michael Lorence Williamsburg, VA Gayle Moore Martinsville, IN Tom Potter Clerk Martinsville, IN Barry Andrews, D.Min. Rochelle Johnson, PhD Bainbridge Island, WA Caldwell, ID Michael Berger, PhD Paul Schacht, PhD Cincinnati, OH Rochester, NY Andrew Celentano Michael Stoneham, PhD Stoneham, MA Washingtonville, NY Dianne Weiss Concord, MA EVENT MAP Program Schedule Wednesday, July 6 First Night Masonic Temple 7-9 pm Panel Discussion “Is Thoreau Really ‘Pond Scum’,” Joseph L. “Joel” Andrews and Michael Lorence Performance “Skimming the Surface, A Katherine Schultz Inspired Play” Tammy Rose Thursday, July 7 8 am Registration Opens Masonic Temple 9-10 am Session I Masonic Temple Main Level “Reading Thoreau’s Journal,” Barry Andrews, D.Min. Lower Level “How Walden Works: The Hydrology of the Pond,” John M. Nevison 10:15- Session II Masonic Temple 11:45 am Main Level “Nature, Ecology and the Spiritual Vision of Henry David Thoreau,” Rev’d Dr Daniel Medina, CJ, O.S.B., D.Min.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Analysis of the Use of Supportive Apparel in Powerlifting Jan Todd
    Trinity University Digital Commons @ Trinity School of Business Faculty Research School of Business 11-2015 Shifting Gear: A Historical Analysis of the Use of Supportive Apparel in Powerlifting Jan Todd Dominic G. Morais Trinity University, [email protected] Ben Pollack Terry Todd Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/busadmin_faculty Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons Repository Citation Todd, J., Morais, D. G., Pollack, B., & Todd, T. (2015). Shifting gear: A historical analysis of the use of supportive apparel in powerlifting. Iron Game History, 13(2-3), 37-56. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Business at Digital Commons @ Trinity. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Business Faculty Research by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Trinity. For more information, please contact [email protected]. November/December 2015 Iron Game History SHIFTING GEAR: A HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF SUPPORTIVE APPAREL IN POWERLIFTING Jan Todd, Dominic Gray Morais, Ben Pollack & Terry Todd The University of Texas at Austin & Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas In many ways, powerlifting is an odd sport. the sport into several dozen sporting federations, and the Competitors do not run or jump; no balls, bats, or rackets willingness of many of these national governing bodies are used; and only one competitor "plays" on the lifting to allow various levels of gear-assisted lifting in their platform at a time. Judging can be highly subjective; organizations. If sport philosopher Robert Simon is right three judges intently watch as the athlete lifts the loaded that, "sport" is nothing more than a group of rules that barbell nine separate times over the course of the com­ defme and delimit how the central contest of the sport is petition.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecocentrism, Economics and Commensurability
    www.ecologicalcitizen.net EDITORIAL Ecocentrism, economics and commensurability “Whatsoever is not conscious of itself and discipline, committed in some basic, Adam not master of itself is a thing. Whatever fundamental way to anthropocentrism? is conscious of itself and master of itself Certainly, the latter thought is encouraged Dickerson is a person. […] Man alone is a person; by passages like the one quoted above About the author minerals, plants and animals are things. from Léon Walras’s great founding text Adam is a philosopher who From the rational point of view, the of neoclassical marginalist analysis, the has taught at universities purpose of things is under the dominion Éléments d’économie politique pure (4th in the UK and Australia. of the purpose of persons. […] If there edition, 1899). But perhaps passages like He is the author of Kant were only one man in the world he would this, extolling human mastery over non- on Representation and be master of all things.” human nature, are inessential to economics Objectivity (Cambridge University Press, 2004) (Walras, 1954: 62)1 proper; perhaps they are of no more and various papers in relevance to economics than Newton’s philosophy, aesthetics, occultism is to the theories of classical and cultural history. he discourse of economics – at least mechanics. in its orthodox, ‘neoclassical’ form, That would certainly be the mainstream Citation as taught to tens of thousands of view, in which economics is conceived of Dickerson A (2020) T Ecocentrism, economics university students every year – wields as a ‘positive science’ whose relationship and commensurability. The tremendous institutional, and therefore to ethics is easily stated.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Trends & Dynamics
    Briefing Political Trends & Dynamics The Far Right in the EU and the Western Balkans Volume 3 | 2020 POLITICAL TRENDS & DYNAMICS IN SOUTHEAST EUROPE A FES DIALOGUE SOUTHEAST EUROPE PROJECT Peace and stability initiatives represent a decades-long cornerstone of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung’s work in southeastern Europe. Recent events have only reaffirmed the centrality of Southeast European stability within the broader continental security paradigm. Both de- mocratization and socio-economic justice are intrinsic aspects of a larger progressive peace policy in the region, but so too are consistent threat assessments and efforts to prevent conflict before it erupts. Dialogue SOE aims to broaden the discourse on peace and stability in southeastern Europe and to counter the securitization of prevalent narratives by providing regular analysis that involves a comprehensive understanding of human security, including structural sources of conflict. The briefings cover fourteen countries in southeastern Europe: the seven post-Yugoslav countries and Albania, Greece, Turkey, Cyprus, Bulgaria, Romania, and Moldova. PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED • Civic Mobilizations • The Digital Frontier in • The European Project in the Western in Southeast Europe Southeast Europe Balkans: Crisis and Transition February / March 2017 February / March 2018 Volume 2/2019 • Regional Cooperation in • Religion and Secularism • Chinese Soft Power the Western Balkans in Southeast Europe in Southeast Europe April / Mai 2017 April / May 2018 Volume 3/2019 • NATO in Southeast Europe
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Ecocentric Theory
    Democracy and the Claims of Nature Edited by Bob Pepperman Taylor and Ben Minteer Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc, 2002. “Environmental pragmatism, ecocentrism and deliberative democracy: between problem- solving and fundamental critique’ Robyn Eckersley Introduction The debate over the virtues of ecocentric theory (moral monism) versus environmental pragmatism (moral pluralism) provides an occasion to reflect upon the democratic character of these respective environmental philosophies and their associated political practices. Environmental pragmatists have been generally critical of monistic philosophies, which they understand ecocentrism to be, on the grounds that they are dogmatic, insensitive to diverse cultural and moral contexts and therefore too inflexible to be of any assistance in the practical resolution of environmental problems and conflicts.1 Environmental pragmatism, on the other hand, is defended as more tolerant, open-minded and ecumenical in its respect for moral pluralism and cultural diversity and more democratic in its defense of environmental policy deliberation by the affected parties. It is also defended as more effective when it comes to practical environmental problem solving. In response, ecocentric philosophers (most notably J. Baird Callicott) have argued that the pragmatists’ embrace of moral pluralism carries with it the danger of lapsing into indecisive relativism. In particular, the refusal by environmental pragmatists to privilege any substantive environmental values in advance of policy dialogue is seen as problematic insofar as it can lead to philosophical contradictions and dubious political outcomes that may not necessarily protect the environment.2 According to this construction, ecocentric theorists and activists are the fearless environmental justice advocates, standing up for the interests of the environmental victims of economic development, including both humans and nonhuman species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Act of Writing
    The Act of Writing The Act of Writing A Media Theory Approach Daniel Chandler Prifysgol Cymru Aberystwyth University of Wales First Published in Great Britain in 1995 by the University of Wales, Aberystwyth Copyright (C) 1995 Daniel Chandler The right of Daniel Chandler to be identified as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission. Cover design: Daniel Chandler and Alun Jones Cataloguing in Publication data Chandler, Daniel (Glen Joel), 1952- The act of writing: a media theory approach 1. Authorship I. Title 808’.042 PN145 ISBN 0 903878 44 5 Printed and bound by The Registry, UWA, Old College, King Street, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 2AX, Wales, UK Acknowledgements I would like to express my grateful thanks to friends and colleagues for their kind and constructive observations on early versions of some of these chapters. These include: John Beynon (University of Glamorgan), Rose Chandler, Paul Ghuman (UWA), James Hartley (University of Keele), Gareth Elwyn Jones (UWA), Hughie Mackay (University of Glamorgan), Stephen Marcus (University of California at Santa Barbara), Peter Medway (Carleton University, Ottawa), Mike Sharples (University of Sussex), Paula Thomas (UWA) and Steve Westmore. My survey of academic writers would not have been possible without the kind co-operation of over a hundred of my colleagues, and I would like to express my particular appreciation to those who kindly allowed me to interview them in detail about their own writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagining Cascadia
    Imagining Cascadia: Bioregionalism as Environmental Culture in the Pacific Northwest Ingeborg Husbyn Aarsand A thesis presented to The Department of Literature, Area Studies, and European Languages North American Area Studies Faculty of Humanities Advisor: Mark Luccarelli In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the MA degree UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Fall 2013 Author: Ingeborg Husbyn Aarsand Title: Imagining Cascadia: Bioregionalism as Environmental Culture in the Pacific Northwest 2013 http://www.duo.uio.no/ Print: Reprosentralen, University of Oslo II Abstract This thesis discusses the usefulness of the concept of bioregionalism as a social and cultural environmental practice, and as a response to the environmental crisis of our time. The thesis addresses an important issue in environmental discourse by considering whether bioregionalism’s place-based approach with its ethic of “reinhabitation” could challenge mainstream environmentalism. The thesis raises a critique of today’s professionalized and technocratic environmental movement. This thesis will argue that bioregional thinking evokes agrarianism and is indeed useful, because it can offer a “practical utopian” answer to the current environmental catastrophe. It is pragmatic, regionally specific, and reinforces the concept of place as central to the environmental discourse and debate. Ecological utopias have a role to play in environmental thinking because of their transformational power and pragmatic aspects. This thesis will show how the imagined bioregion of “Cascadia” is being constituted in different cultural representations of place, such as narratives about imagined places in music, film, and literature, and how this in turn is “placemaking.” This thesis argues that cultural representations of “place,” such as narratives about imagined recovery of places, can bring about both desperately needed inspiration for us humans to find local solutions to a global environmental crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Responsibility for an Ecology Agenda
    PHIL & TECH 1:1&2 Fall 1995 Sassower, Intellectual Responsibility for an Ecology Agenda INTELLECTUAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR AN ECOLOGY AGENDA Raphael Sassower, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs I: FROM HARAWAY TO BACON THROUGH WORLD WAR II After Auschwitz and Hiroshima—using these words as labels and signifiers of many phenomena and issues—I think we all would agree that technoscience (in Bruno Latour's sense of 1987) is not only the contested ground for debates informed by technophobia and technophilia (see, e.g., Hickman, 1985, Part I), but is also the site where personal and public responsibility should be scrutinized under a magnifying glass. Whatever the question, whether rainforests or urban pollution, responsibility is traversing the private/public domains along a conceptual path that is often called "globalism." This framework itself tries to maintain a dialectical balance between localism and globalism; yet, as Andrew Ross says, this "globalist move is not taking place in a political vacuum" (Ross, 1991, p. 221). Philosophical debates about the environment, deep ecology (e.g., Naess, 1973) or feminist ecology, the Gaia hypothesis or energy conservation, recycling or the life-world, are articulated within particular frameworks that remain informed by political pressures, regardless of their globalist/universalist pretense. More specifically, the European and North American framework is more informed by free market ideology than by socialist or anarchist concerns. Hence, the "treatment" of the environment is posed as an issue for which every citizen is equally responsible, instead of focusing attention on the prime violators or corporate abuses. It goes without saying that indeed every individual contributes to the pollution of the environment in some fashion; but such an admission fails to account for the disproportion of pollutants in terms of the geographical location of manufacturers and their immediate surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOREGIONALISM Two Basic Meanings • SCIENTIFIC
    BIOREGIONALISM Two basic meanings • SCIENTIFIC: biogeography. How is nature different in different areas, and how does that impact what we should do? • CULTURAL: an ecosocial movement. How should we conceive of nature and relate to it? Basic insights • “The world is made of places.” (Gary Snyder) • “You are a part of a part and the whole is made of parts, each of which is whole. You start with the part you are whole in.” (Gary Snyder) • “Think little.” (Wendell Berry) Terms in bioregionalism • Bioregion (ecoregion) • Watershed • Natural communities • Place • Identification • Reinhabitation • Scale • Bioregional/watershed consciousness Definitions of “Bioregion” “A bioregion is defined in terms of the unique overall pattern of natural characteristics that are found in a specific place. The main features are generally found throughout a continuous geographic terrain and include a particular climate, local aspects of seasons, landforms, watersheds, soils, and native plants and animals.” (Peter Berg) “A bioregion can be determined initially by use of climatology, physiography, animal and plant geography, natural history and other descriptive natural sciences. The final boundaries of a bioregion, however, are best described by the people who have lived within it, through human recognition of the realities of living-in-place.” (Peter Berg & Raymond Dasmann) “People are also counted as an integral aspect of a place’s life, as can be seen in the ecologically adaptive cultures of early inhabitants, and in the activities of present day reinhabitants
    [Show full text]
  • Bioregionalism, Community and Environmental Ethics: an Approach to Geographical Borderlines
    BIOREGIONALISM, COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS: AN APPROACH TO GEOGRAPHICAL BORDERLINES Dominique Waissbluth* FTER SOME INTRODUCTORY REMARKS IN SECTION 1 ON THE BIORE- GIONALIST PROJECT, section 2 advances an outline of bioregionalism in view of its implementation in communities. Section 3 examines the concepts of community and locality, assessing their respective relevan- Ace for bioregionalism. In turn, section 4 addresses concerns regarding the aims and scope of bioregionalism. In particular, I intend to demonstrate that the bioregionalist move needs yet further development in order to thoroughly represent a live alternati- ve in the environmental ethical debate on sustainability and borderline. Keywords: bioregionalism; environmental ethics; community; geographical borderlines. BIOREGIONALISMO, COMUNIDAD Y ÉTICA MEDIOAMBIENTAL: UNA APROXIMACIÓN A LOS LÍMITES GEOGRÁFICOS Luego de algunas observaciones introductorias sobre el bioregionalismo en la sec- ción 1, describo las líneas generales de la doctrina bioregionalista en vistas de su implementación en comunidades en la sección 2. La sección 3 examina los con- ceptos de comunidad y localidad, evaluando la relevancia de ellos para el proyecto bioregionalista. La sección 4 aborda los objetivos y los límites del bioregionalismo. * Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics School of Historical and Philosophical Studies University of Melbourne. Correo electrónico: [email protected] BIOREGIONALISM, COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS ● DOMINIQUE WAISSBLUTH 13 En particular, intento demostrar que el bioregionalismo requiere de desarrollos y re- finamientos ulteriores para representar una alternativa legitima en el debate en ética medioambiental sobre sustentabilidad y límites. Palabras clave: bioregionalismo; ética medioambiental; comunidad; límites geográficos 1. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS A bioregional project represents an interesting option within the debate on borderli- ne issues, since it deals with a new conception of a more sustainable reorganization of land.
    [Show full text]