DOCSLIB.ORG

North Warwickshire Local Plan Examination Hearings Position

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Warwickshire Local Plan Examination Hearings Position North Warwickshire Local Plan Examination Hearings Position Statement Matter 9: Allocations and supply of land for development requirements Prepared for: Client: Mr R Arnold and Mrs R Bell Site: Land south of Shuttington Village Hall, Shuttington Date: March 2019 1. Introduction 1.1. This Statement has been prepared by Fisher German on behalf of Mr Ralph Arnold & Mrs Rosemary Bell, landowners of proposed housing allocation site H25 (Land south of Shuttington Village Hall). A site location plan is enclosed at Appendix 1. 1.2. As previously advised in our Hearing Statement for Matter 4, positive pre-application advice was obtained from the Council in respect of residential development on the site. Since the first phase of Examination Hearings in 2018, an outline planning application (with all matters reserved except for access) has been submitted (Ref: PAP/2019/0022). This is currently being determined by the Council. 1.3. Planning application documents and consultee comments that are relevant to the questions raised by the Inspector have been appended to this Position Statement. 1.4. An updated Hearing Matters, Issues and Questions document has been prepared by the Inspector, now including questions in respect of Matter 9: Allocations and supply of land for development requirements. This Statement will focus specifically on issues/questions 9.8 (b) and 9.37 (a) and (b). PAGE 2 2. Site Allocations – Overarching Issues 9.8 Are the categorisations of settlements in policy LP2 appropriate with regard to the updated Settlement Sustainability Assessment (‘SSA’) [CD6/3C]? (b) Should certain ‘category 5’ settlements be re-assigned based on their current scoring in CD6/3C?26 26 It appears that category 5 settlements of Corley, Middleton and Furnace End score more favourably in terms of accessibility of services and facilities than some category 4 settlements (Shustoke and Shuttington). 2.1. As previously detailed in our Hearing Statement to Matter 4 (please see Appendix 2), we support the identification of Shuttington as a Category 4 Settlement (Other Settlement with a Development Boundary), Shuttington benefits from the following services and facilities: • Village Hall & Playing Field • Village Supermarket/Convenience Store • Public House • Place of Worship • Auto Repair/MOT Garage • School Bus Services to Newton Regis Primary School and Polesworth School • Regular bus service to Tamworth Town Centre 2.2. Whilst the updated SSA [CD6/3C] has reduced Shuttington’s score by 1, this is only due to the loss of the infrequent (Thursdays only) Flexibus 224 service. Notwithstanding this, the village still continues to be served by the regular 785/786 bus service to Tamworth. New development in Shuttington is crucial as this will ensure the continued viability of the village’s services and facilities. 2.3. It is noted that Corley, Middleton and Furnace End score more favourably in the updated SSA, in terms of accessibility to services and facilities than Shuttington and Shutstoke. However, the difference in scores is very marginal in the case of Furnace End (1 point more than Shuttington). In the case of Corley (3 points more), we believe the score of 2 attributed to the Corley Centre – a Secondary School only for children with complex social and communication difficulties, has been artificially inflated because by nature the school will serve a very wide catchment and not a large section of the local community, as a non-specialised Secondary School would. In the case of Middleton (4 points more), we note that 4 points have been attributed to local employers which are located in close association with the village. However, we consider this scoring to unfairly penalise settlements such as Shuttington which not only benefit from their own employment opportunities, but also from a close relationship with larger settlements (i.e. Tamworth), which provide more significant employment opportunities for the village’s population. 2.4. As detailed in paragraphs 6.5 and 6.8 of the SAA, Corley, Middleton and Furnace End are located within the Green Belt. The Council have chosen to not upgrade Corley, Middleton and Furnace PAGE 3 End in the Hierarchy, as this would mean taking them out of the Green Belt. The Council do not believe there is a need to release these villages from the Green Belt and do not consider it possible to do so as most of the settlements are dispersed in nature. Shuttington on the other hand is compact in nature and development will integrate with the existing pattern of development. 2.5. Paragraph 83 of the NPPF 2012 is clear that Green Belt boundaries should only be altered “in exceptional circumstances”. Considering the availability of land in sustainable locations such as Shuttington, we do not consider there is sufficient justification to raise the status of these locations, nor take them out of the Green Belt. 2.6. The Council’s decision to allocate land in non-Green Belt villages such as Shuttington is supported and reflects the NPPF. Releasing land from the Green Belt in villages such as Corley, Middleton and Furnace End is unnecessary and unjustified. 3. Category 3 & 4 settlement allocations and policy LP2 in respect of land outside of settlements 9.37 Allocation H25, Land south of Shuttington Village Hall (a) is the scale of the allocation, for 24 homes compared to a threshold of 10 indicated in Local Plan policy LP2, justified?45 45 Noting the representation of Alvecote & Shuttington Parish Council, SLP301. 3.1. Representation SLP301 from the Alvecote & Shuttington Parish Council states the following: “The Core Strategy did much more to protect Category 4 settlements like Shuttington and Alvecote so that settlement sites were normally no larger than 10 units. We have seen our site increased to 24 units. The only relevant comment being that services are limited. So there is no justification to more than double the housing allocation”. 3.2. In respect of the Category 4 Settlements, Policy LP2 Settlement Hierarchy does not set a threshold of 10 dwellings. The Policy is clear that “development will be limited to that identified in this Plan…” which in the case of Shuttington, is land to the south of Shuttington Village Hall for 24 dwellings. 3.3. Policy LP2 goes on to state that “It will cater for windfall housing development usually of no more than 10 units at any one time depending on viability”. Where reference is made to 10 dwellings, this is not set as a maximum threshold as reflected in the use of the word “usually”. Furthermore, the reference relates to windfall housing developments, not those identified in the Plan. 3.4. Similarly reference to sites of 10 dwellings in Category 4 settlements in the Core Strategy advised that sites would “normally” be no larger than 10 units at any one time. It did not set 10 dwellings as a maximum limit to growth in these settlements. PAGE 4 3.5. The scale of the allocation for 24 dwellings is considered to be in full accordance with Policy LP2. 3.6. As set out in our response to the Inspector’s question 9.8 b) 26), Shuttington benefits from a number of services and facilities which can support a development of 24 dwellings. 3.7. We have previously highlighted in our Hearing Statement for Matter 4, that we consider that the allocation of the land at Shuttington for 24 dwellings is in conformity with Paragraph 55 of the NPPF 2012 which states that “to promote sustainable development in rural areas, housing should be located where it will enhance or maintain the vitality of rural communities. For example, where there are groups of smaller settlements, development in one village may support services in a village nearby”. 3.8. In terms of Shuttington, development here would have the benefit of enhancing and maintaining the vitality of the village. In addition to having a good number of existing day to day services and facilities within the village itself, Shuttington also benefits from a functional relationship with services in nearby villages (and indeed with Tamworth). As such, the proposed allocation of the land south of Shuttington Village Hall is considered to be a positive action towards supporting Shuttington and other nearby villages to thrive. 3.9. As detailed previously, an outline planning application has now been submitted for the development of 24 dwellings on land to the south of Shuttington Village Hall. The table below summarises the position of the responses received from the statutory consultees to date. It is clear from the responses received to date that there is no reason to suggest that 24 dwellings is unsustainable, or will have unacceptable detrimental impacts. A further update on the outstanding responses will be provided to the Inspector at the Hearing Session for this Matter. Consultee Status Warwickshire County Council (WCC) Flood Risk No Objection Management The Coal Authority (TCA) No Objection Warwickshire County Council (WCC) Planning No Objection Archaeologist Warwickshire County Council (WCC) Ecology No Objection Services North Warwickshire DC Environmental Health No Objection Officer Warwickshire County Council (WCC) Local No Objection Highway Authority Warwickshire Police – Designing Out Crime No Objection Officer PAGE 5 Warwickshire Fire Authority No Objection North Warwickshire Borough Council – Waste No Objection and Transport Manager North Warwickshire Borough Council – Housing No Objection Strategy and Development Officer Warwickshire County Council – Rights of Way No Objection GIS and Access Information Officer North Warwickshire Pollution Control Officer No Objection Alvecote & Shuttington Parish Council Concern Expressed 3.10. Finally, allowing schemes over 10 dwellings to come forward on sites such as the land to the south of Shuttington ensures that developer contributions can be gained which otherwise would not have been obtained. The land south of Shuttington Village Hall will also be able to provide affordable housing for the village which may not otherwise have been delivered by smaller schemes (of up to 10 dwellings) as per the Planning Practice Guidance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North Warwickshire Local Plan Core Strategy Proposed Submission
    Deleted: ¶ Local Development Framework¶ Local Plan Deleted: Draft Pre- Core Strategy Deleted: Version Deleted: June Proposed Submission Formatted: Centered Formatted: Font: 18 pt North Warwickshire Forming part of the Local Plan for North Warwickshire September 2012 Deleted: Formatted: Left Core Strategy - Proposed Submission Deleted: Draft September 2012 Deleted: Pre- Deleted: Core Strategy Deleted: June PREFACE Deleted: 1 Welcome to the Core Strategy Proposed Submission which sets out the strategic Deleted: Draft Pre planning policies that the Borough Council, with its partners, will pursue over the next Deleted: - 20 years. This may seem a long time especially in this fast moving world but the Deleted: Version Core policies in this Core Strategy have been written to give them some flexibility and Strategy longevity as well as give the framework for other planning policies that will make up the Local Development Framework. The key priority is to keep the rural nature of the Borough and to ensure that when entering North Warwickshire it is clearly defined as being rural with a high quality of environment. It also seeks to tackle the key issues that the Borough faces of health, skills, and access to services and facilities, including affordable housing. The Core Strategy is one part of the Local Plan for North Warwickshire. Over the coming years additional documents will be produced as and when necessary, including Neighbourhood Plans and together they will form the Local Plan. Deleted: ¶ Following consideration of the representations we have produced this final Deleted: Your views, especially on the changes that submission version of the Strategy. Only if there are issues that make this document have been made since the unsound will further changes then be made.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Off Robey's Lane, Tamworth Landscape Appraisal & Review Of
    Landscape Appraisal & Review of Meaningful Gap Assessment fpcr Hallam Land Management Ltd Land off Robey’s Lane, Tamworth Landscape Appraisal & Review of North Warwickshire Meaningful Gap Assessment March 2015 1 Landscape Appraisal & Review of Meaningful Gap Assessment fpcr FPCR Environment and Design Ltd Registered Office: Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby DE74 2RH Company No. 07128076. [T] 01509 672772 [F] 01509 674565 [E] [email protected] [W] www.fpcr.co.uk This report is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without the written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd. Ordnance Survey material is used with permission of The Controller of HMSO, Crown copyright 100018896. Rev Issue Status Prepared / Date Approved/Date -draft 06.03.15 BC 06.03.15 BC A FINAL 10.03.15 BC 10.03.15 BC 2 Landscape Appraisal & Review of Meaningful Gap Assessment fpcr 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This is a Landscape Appraisal & Review of the North Warwickshire Meaningful Gap Assessment (2015) which has been prepared by North Warwickshire Borough Council. 1.2 This report has been prepared by FPCR Environment & Design Ltd on behalf of our client, Hallam Land Management Ltd (HLM). 1.3 HLM have an interest in land to the north of the B5000 (Tamworth Road) to the east of the Tamworth. This area of land is hereon referred to as the ‘site’ and is shown in Figure 1. The local and wider context around the site, as identified in Figure 1, is referred to as the ‘Study Area.’ 1.3 The site comprises agricultural land that lies between the urban area of Tamworth to the west and the M42 Motorway to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes of the Area Forum North Meeting Held at Shuttington and Alvecote Village Hall on Thursday, 2 June 2016
    Notes of the Area Forum North Meeting held at Shuttington and Alvecote Village Hall on Thursday, 2 June 2016 Present: Councillor Morson in the Chair, Councillors Chambers, Davey, Hanratty, E Stanley, M Stanley, Sweet In Attendance: Amanda Tonks - North Warwickshire Borough Council, Sergeant Mitch Oakley, PCSOs Simeon Hodson and Lauren Hughes – Warwickshire Police, Geoff Taylor and John Moore – Baddesley Parish Council, Jim Pearson and Brian Wright – Baxterley Parish Council, Joan Daniels – Polesworth Parish Council, Dave Hanratty – Dordon Resident, Steve Exley – Polesworth Resident, J Webb – Birchmoor Neighbourhood Watch. Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Humphreys, Smitten and A Wright. 1 Matters Arising from the Notes of the Meeting held on 11 February 2016 There were no matters arising from the notes of the meeting held on 11 February 2016 2 Safer Neighbourhoods As part of the Safer Neighbourhoods update the following three priorities were agreed: Speeding - Newlands Road and New Street, Baddesley Ensor and Green Lane Birchmoor; Anti-Social Behaviour – Abbey Green Park and Tithe Barn, Polesworth; and Parking – New Street, Dordon. 3 Growth Options for North Warwickshire and a new Local Plan Dorothy Barratt gave a presentation explaining the production for a new Local Plan and the reasons behind it. Various changes had taken place since the adoption of the Core Strategy in October 2014 including new population and household figures, leading to a new objectively assessed need for housing, updated employment land figures and a clearer understanding of issues with neighbours. The Core Strategy had a requirement of 3150 with 500 dwellings for Tamworth. The new emerging housing requirement is a minimum of 5280 up to 2031with the possibility of a further 3790 dwellings giving a total of around 9100 dwellings.
    [Show full text]
  • TAMWORTH HERALD 1 28 May 1870 KILLING a PHEASANT at Mr
    TAMWORTH HERALD 1 28 May 1870 KILLING A PHEASANT At Mr Shaw's office on Thursday the 19th inst, before T Bramall Esq, Alfred Burford (15), boatman, was charged with stealing a tame pheasant, value 30s, the property of Sir R Peel. The bird, it appeared, escaped from an enclosure at Drayford Manor on to the canal side near Drayton, where defendant was coming along with his boat. He saw it, and in spite of the remonstrances of a postman named Redfern, killed it and threw it in his boat. He was followed by one of Sir R Peel's gamekeepers who took the bird out of the boat and gave the defendant into the custody of the police at Fazeley. Fined 10s and 8s costs, or 14 days. 2 23 July 1870 Warwickshire Assizes PLEADED GUILTY John Lakin, boatman, stealing 15 fowls, the property of Francis Whitworth at Wishaw, on the 1st of July. Four months imprisonment. 3 5 November 1870 Coleshill Petty Sessions HIGHWAY Francis Woodhouse, boatman, Bedworth, was charged with allowing an ass to stray on the highway at Curdworth on the 17th October. Defendant pleaded guilty, and was ordered to pay the costs. 4 13 January 1872 Swadlincote Thomas Jones, boatman of Measham, who did not appear, was fined 10s 6d and costs for being drunk and riotous at Measham on the 18th ultimo. 5 20 January 1872 Fradley A GAMEKEEPER DROWNED – INHUMAN CONDUCT OF A BOATMAN On Saturday night last, David Holt, gamekeeper to Richard Ratcliffe Esq, Walton Hall, was drowned in the canal at Fradley Junction.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Enc I Urgent Care Consultation Report.Pdf
    NHS Warwickshire North Clinical Commissioning Group Enc I Report To: Governing Body Report Title: Urgent Care Consultation Report Report From: Jenni Northcote Director Partnerships and Engagement Date: 22nd January 2015 Previously considered by: Purpose of the report: To provide details of the outcome of the Public Consultation on Improving Urgent Care. The consultation report and associated appendices are provided to the Governing Body for consideration in the context of making a decision on the location of walk-in provision; alongside other information which will be presented and discussed in public at the governing body meeting on 28th January. Key Points: NHS WNCCG undertook a consultation on Improving Urgent Care between 6th October and 15th December 2015. The consultation was undertaken by Arden and Gem Commissioning Support Unit. The consultation set out two options for the location of walk-in provision. The two options were: Option 1: To relocate the walk-in service from Camp Hill to be provided on the George Eliot Hospital site, as part of a fully integrated urgent care service working closely with A&E, NHS 111 and the GP out of hours service on this site. Option 2: Keep the walk-in service as a standalone urgent care service at Camp Hill. (I.e. Do nothing.) During the consultation period over 1000 conversations were conducted and 630 consultation forms were completed. Responses were received from a wide range of locations covered by NHS WNCCG and bordering areas. Responses were from individuals and on behalf of organisations. The outcome of the consultation was : • Option 1 338 respondents • Option 2 292 respondents • Total 630 Option One: To relocate the walk-in provision to the George Eliot Hospital Site was the preferred option by a difference of 7.7%.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PS.M4.07 Fisher German
    North Warwickshire Local Plan Examination Phase 1 Hearings Position Statement Matter 4: Strategic approach, distribution of development and justification Introduction 1.1. This Position Statement has been prepared by Fisher German on behalf of Mr Ralph Arnold & Mrs Rosemary Bell, landowners of proposed housing allocation site H25 (Land south of Shuttington Village Hall). 1.2. Positive Pre-Application Advice has been obtained from the Council in respect of residential development on the land south of Shuttington Village Hall and a planning application is currently being prepared. 1.3. Consideration has been given to Annex 1 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2018 which states that the policies of the previous Framework will apply for the purposes of examining plans, where those plans were submitted on or before 24th January 2019. This is the case with the North Warwickshire Local Plan, which was submitted in March 2018. 1.4. A number of issues and questions have been raised by the Inspector in relation to Matter 4. However, in the interests of our Clients, this Statement will focus specifically on issues 4.7 and 4.9. 1.5. Finally, in respect of the Inspector’s question at 4.6, “Is the settlement hierarchy justified and consistent with national policy?”, please refer to the response set out in respect of 4.7 a) and b). 1 4.7 – LP Paragraph 1.7 explains that the settlement hierarchy is based on ‘an assessment of the services, facilities and sustainability of the various settlements’. a) Where is that assessment set out specifically? b) Is each settlement correctly categorised? 1.6.
    [Show full text]
  • North Warwickshire Local Development Framework
    North Warwickshire Local Development Framework Statement of Community Involvement April 2007 North Warwickshire Statement of Community Involvement – April 2007 1 Contents Abbreviations Used in this Document 3 1 Introduction 4 Part A: Consulting on Development Planning 2 A New Planning System: Local Development Frameworks (LDFs) 7 3 Links with Other Plans and Policies 9 4 Who We Will Consult 10 5 How We Will Consult 12 6 Local Development Documents (LDDs) and Sustainability 15 Appraisal (SA): When We Will Consult Part B: Consulting on Planning Applications 7 Introduction 25 8 The Application Process 25 9 Consultation During the Application Process 27 10 Other Types of Application 33 11 Alleged Breaches of Planning Control 34 12 Data Protection and Copyright 35 Part C: Monitoring 13 Review and Monitoring of the SCI 37 Appendices 1 Local Development Frameworks 2 Specific Consultation Bodies 3 General Consultation Bodies / Other Consultees 4 Equality Impact Assessment 5 Determination of a Planning Application 6 Relevant Planning Considerations 7 Non-Statutory Consultees for Planning Applications 8 Occasions where the Council is under a Statutory Duty to publicise applications 9 Neighbour Notification Guide If you require further assistance, or information in another language, large type, Braille or audio tape format, please contact the Forward Planning Team: North Warwickshire Borough Council, PO Box 6, The Council House, South Street, Atherstone, Warwickshire, CV9 1BG Tel: 01827 719499/250 E-mail: [email protected] North Warwickshire
    [Show full text]
  • Download Housing
    North Warwickshire Borough Council Useful Contacts One Stop Shop: 01827 715341 The Customer Services in the Council’s One Stop Shop takes all of the Housing Division’s telephone calls except for the repairs service. Day to Day Repairs: 01827 719299 Tenancy Services Team The Tenancy Services work with individual existing Council Tenants about matters that arise about their tenancy-rent collection, nuisance issues, changes to tenancies, settling in visits to new tenants. Tony Wheeler Tenancy Services Offi cer 01827 719205 / 07970 248269 Austrey, Baddesley Ensor, Baxterley, Dordon, Grendon, Mancetter, Newton Regis, Polesworth, Ridge Lane, Shuttington, Warton, Witherley. Elizabeth Bell-Paton Tenancy Services Offi cer 01827 719407 / 07970 248225 Coleshill, Curdworth, Fillongley, Hurley, Kingsbury, Lea Marston, Maxstoke, Middleton, Nether Whitacre, Over Whitacre, Hartshill, Piccadilly, Shustoke , Water Orton, Wishaw, Wood End. Maggie Jaggs Tenancy Services Offi cer 01827 719306 / 07970 248268 Atherstone, Corley, Ansley, Arley (new and old), Chapel End, Birchley Heath. Helen Hughes Principal Housing Management Offi cer 01827 719494 Caroline Morris Senior Housing Management Offi cer 01827 719351 / 07989 159949 Maureen Abbott Tenancy Enforcement Offi cer 01827 719312 / 07970 248226 North Warwickshire Borough Council Useful Contacts Neighbourhood Services The Neighbourhood Services Offi cer, Debbie Fitter, works with other agencies to address nuisance issues that happen in communal areas. The Estate Warden Team works to make sure that the communal areas of Council estates are in good order. The Floating Support Offi cers provide support and assistance to the elderly in their homes. Debbie Fitter Neighbourhood Offi cer 07970 248236 Julie Richardson Neighbourhood Warden 07772 317223 Corley, Fillongley, Old Arley, New Arley, Ansley, Ansley Common, Ridge Lane, Chapel End, Hartshill.
    [Show full text]
  • 785 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    785 bus time schedule & line map 785 Tamworth - Tamworth View In Website Mode The 785 bus line Tamworth - Tamworth has one route. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Tamworth Town Centre: 9:40 AM - 1:40 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 785 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 785 bus arriving. Direction: Tamworth Town Centre 785 bus Time Schedule 46 stops Tamworth Town Centre Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 9:40 AM - 1:40 PM Monday Not Operational Corporation St, Tamworth Town Centre Corporation Street, Tamworth Tuesday Not Operational Bus Garage, Tamworth Town Centre Wednesday Not Operational Aldergate, Tamworth Thursday Not Operational The Albert Ph, Tamworth Town Centre Friday Not Operational 38 Albert Road, Tamworth Saturday Not Operational Aldi Store, Tamworth Town Centre 73 Alexandra Mews, Tamworth Bolebridge Street, Bolehall 785 bus Info Moor Lane, Bolehall Direction: Tamworth Town Centre Amington Road, England Stops: 46 Trip Duration: 65 min Amington Inn, Bolehall Line Summary: Corporation St, Tamworth Town Centre, Bus Garage, Tamworth Town Centre, The Ferrers Road, Bolehall Albert Ph, Tamworth Town Centre, Aldi Store, 137 Amington Road, Tamworth Tamworth Town Centre, Bolebridge Street, Bolehall, Moor Lane, Bolehall, Amington Inn, Bolehall, Ferrers The Riddings, Bolehall Road, Bolehall, The Riddings, Bolehall, Tilia Road, The Riddings, Tamworth Amington, Woodhouse Lane, Amington, The Green, Amington, The Pretty Pigs Ph, Amington, Tilia Road, Amington Shuttington Road, Alvecote,
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Areas in the Borough of North Warwickshire
    CONSERVATION AREAS IN THE BOROUGH OF NORTH WARWICKSHIRE NOVEMBER 1995 CONTENTS Conservation Areas in North Warwickshire designated under the Civic An~eriitiesAct of 1967 and subsequent legislation. Date of Designation 1. ATHERSTONEX October 1994 Review & Extension 2. Watling Street Bridge, January 1983 ATHERSTONE 3. COLESHILL May 1969 4. Coventry Road, October 1995 COLESHILLX 5. FILLONGLEY February1970 6. KINGSBURY June 1983 7. MANCETTER October1983 8. NEWTON REGIS July 1981 9. POLESWORTHX November 1995 10. WATER ORTON June 1983 * Extended Designation Reports Copies of the individual Designation Reposts for each of these areas are available for purchase at £3.53 each or as a complete set for £30.00 The Planning and Development Committee at the meeting of 23 February 1994 agreed that a comprehensive review of Conservation Areas within the Borough should be undertaken with the following order of priority : Atherstone Review (completed October 1994) Poleswol-th - New Designation (completed November 1995) Coleshill - Extensions - (completed October 1995) Coventry Canal - New Designation Review other existing Designated Areas Consider other new designations CONSERVATION AREAS IN NORTH WARWICKSHIRE Watling Street Bridge Conservation Area Atherstone Conservation Area Coleshill Conservation Area Coventry Road, Coleshill Conservation Area Fillongley Conservation Area Kingsbury Conservation Area Mancetter Conservation Area Newton Regis Conservation Area Poleswo~thConservation Area Water Oi-ton Conservation Area TOTAL 115.22ha STAFFORDSHIRE LEICESTERSHIRE LOCATION MAP NORTH WARWICKSHIRE BOROUGH COUNCIL The Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 Atherstone Conservation Area On the 18th November 1995, the North Wanvickshin: Borough Council, by Minute No XX of the Planning and Development Committee, formally designated the area of Atherstone shown on the map appended to the Designation Report as a 'Conservation Area' in accordance with Section 69(2) of The Planning(Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Community-Led Support Groups
    COVID-19 Community-Led Support Groups This directory provides useful information about local organisations, groups and agencies that are providing activities, advice, and services which may support you during the current COVID-19 crisis. We provide the information for you in good faith and make every effort to keep it accurate and up to date but we cannot guarantee this and so it is your responsibility to check the accuracy of the information before use. Some of the information may be provided by a third party or have links to external sites. We are not responsible for this content and, again, you need to satisfy yourself that the information is correct. If your entry needs to be amended, or your group is no longer operating, please inform us via email on [email protected]. To add your group to this directory, please submit our form. This directory was last updated on 12 May 2020. Borough/ More specific Facebook Email Who Services Provided Postcode Any Further Notes District geographical area /Website Address Age UK Coventry and https:// For the most up-to-date information Warwickshire Age UK www.fac info@ageuk about Age UK Coventry and ✓ General advice can provide Coventry and Countywide CV1 1EX ebook.co covwarks.or Warwickshire services please see ✓ Financial support Information and Warwickshire m/AgeU g.uk https://www.ageuk.org.uk/coventryan Advice to the KCW dwarwickshire/. whole of Warwickshire. https:// We are offering shopping and delivery, www.fac Appoint Us ✓ Delivery of groceries info@appoi from a supermarket click and collect by Warwickshire ebook.co Services ✓ General advice Countywide CV8 2LG ntusservices us or the customer at a variety of and Coventry m/appoi (Midlands)CIC ✓ Friendly telephone call .co.uk locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire
    182 TAMWORTS. STAFFORDSHIRE. Borough SurveyDr, Frederick Edwartl George Brad~haw, district, John Joseph :Norton, -·Urewas, Burt~m-on· Aldergate Trent; Fazeley & Kingsbury districts, Thomas :Bu::don Inspector of District Rates, J ames Hastilow, Hospital st L.R:C.P.Edin. Fazeley; Tamworth district, Herbert Jn. Inspector of Nuisances & Common Lodging Houses, Frdk. Fa us set :M.D., :M:. Ch. Tamworth Edward George Bradshaw, .Aldergate Superintendent Registrar, George R. Shaw, zz Church Manager of .Assembly Rooms, Frederick Hughes street, Tamwurth; deputy, .Alexander John Bartel~ Sergeant-at-Mace & Town Crier, Thomas Justice, 12 Church street, Tamworth l\Iarmion street Registrar of Marriagas, John Watton, Victoria road, Tam~ worth; deputy, Henry Starkey, Marmion st. 'l'amworth T.AMWORTH RURAL DISTRIGr COUNCIL. Registrars of Births & Deaths, Fazeley sub-district, Artbur Clerk, Herbert John Cheatle, 22 Church street, Ta~orth Brown, Victoria road, Tamworth; deputy, Tom 'Bond. Treasurer, Joseph William Beevers, National Provincial Church street, Tamworth; Tamworth sub-district, Bank, Tamworth William Robert W'bite, .Albert road; deputy, Mrs. White- 1Iedical Officer of Health, Herben John Fausset M.D., The Workhouse, Wigginton road, Wigginton, is a build­ ::.\i.Ch. Cole hill, Tamworth; deputy, Cyril Pr:chard ing of brick & stone, available for 195 inmates; Fredk. Burd, .Albert road, Tamworth H. Lawrence, master; Herbert John Fausset M.D. Surveyor & Engineer, Henry John Clarson C.E. 22 Church medical officer; Mrs. Lawrence, matron street, Tamworth Education Committee. Sanitary Inspector, John W. Parker, Heath street Att<>ndance Officer, Edward A. Hatton, Hospital street PUBLIC ESTABLISHMEl\'TS. Clerk, John H'unt Dewes, ro Colehill, Tamworth .Assembly Rooms, Corporation st.
    [Show full text]