DOCSLIB.ORG

Port of Richmond Terminal 3 Log Processing and Export Facility

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Port of Richmond Terminal 3 Log Processing and Export Facility CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA Port of Richmond Terminal 3 Log Processing and Export Facility INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION APRIL 2016 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Terminal 3 Log Processing and Export Facility (PLN15-420) 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Richmond Planning and Building Services Department 450 Civic Center Plaza, Second Floor Richmond, CA 94804-1630 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Lina Velasco, Senior Planner (510) 620-6841 [email protected] 4. Project Location: 1411 Harbour Way South Richmond, CA 94804 Assessor’s Parcel Number: 560-270-060 The project site is located on the west side of Harbour Way South, near its southern terminus, on the southern shoreline of the City of Richmond. The site is located on the east side of Harbor Channel, adjacent to the Richmond Inner Harbor on San Francisco Bay. It is approximately 3,500 feet (0.66 miles) south of Interstate 580, at the intersection of Harbour Way South and Hall Avenue. 5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address: RJJ Resource Management Corporation 1411 Harbour Way South Richmond, CA 94804 Contact: Richard Lyu, President (510) 816-6671 [email protected] 6. General Plan Designation: Port 7. Zoning: M-4 Marine Industrial Initial Study TERMINAL 3 LOG PROCESSING AND EXPORT FACILITY 1 8. Description of Project: Introduction This Initial Study has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, which are codified in Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations. A recent legal ruling will alter the scope of environmental review pursuant to CEQA in comparison with how it has been practiced throughout the State in recent decades. In California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Quality Management District (CBIA v. BAAQMD)((2015) 60 Cal.4th 1086), the California Supreme Court ruled that CEQA does not require an analysis of the existing environment's impact on a potential project, except in limited circumstances. The Court found the term "environmental effects" to mean only the impacts arising from the project's effect on the environment, and not the environment's effect on the project (sometimes referred to as a "CEQA-in-reverse" analysis). Although this ruling limits the scope of CEQA review, the Court noted that a reverse analysis is still required in certain conditions, such as when a project could exacerbate or worsen existing environmental hazards. In addition, a lead agency has authority other than CEQA to require measures to protect public health and safety, as well as the environment. The CBIA v. BAAQMD decision notwithstanding, one of the primary functions of a CEQA document continues to be for informational purposes, to disclose environmental effects of a proposed project to the public. Accordingly, the City of Richmond is publishing this Initial Study, which includes an evaluation of the environment's impacts on a project, consistent with the current version of CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, including mitigation recommendations to reduce or avoid these impacts where feasible. The Initial Study assesses both the existing setting and the project's impacts, and thus addresses the extent to which a project could "exacerbate" an existing environmental condition that is otherwise excluded by the CBIA v. BAAQMD decision. Project Overview RJJ International (RJJ), the project applicant, is proposing to develop and operate a log export facility at Terminal 3 of the Port of Richmond. The proposed project would be located at an already developed site at 1411 Harbour Way South that would be leased from the Port of Richmond. As shown on Figures 1 and 2, the project site is located adjacent to Harbor Channel on the City of Richmond’s southern shoreline along San Francisco Bay. RJJ will operate the log export facility jointly with J.W. Bamford, Inc., which would be responsible for managing the work crews and the day-to-day operations at the site. The proposed project would not require new construction; however, minor repairs to the existing building and facility improvements are proposed as further described in the facility improvement section below. The proposed facility would receive harvested timber from California forests that would be prepared for shipment, then loaded onto ocean-going ships that would berth at Terminal 3. Once loading of a ship is complete, the processed logs would be exported to China. It is anticipated that no more than six shiploads of timber would be exported each year. The tree species to be exported by RJJ would include Douglas fir, white fir, ponderosa pine, sugar pine, and cedar. The trees would be harvested in accordance with an approved Timber Harvest Plan (THP). Additional information about THPs is provided below. Terminal 3 Facilities The proposed project would be implemented at an existing facility at Terminal 3, shown on Figure 3. The approximately 12.4-acre site is enclosed by a 6-foot-high chain-link security fence topped with barbed wired. (Another 1.1 acres at the southern end of the Terminal 3 property Initial Study 2 TERMINAL 3 LOG PROCESSING AND EXPORT FACILITY W T T I T T T T T S T L G R A T T N T A V T S S T S S S S S S T S T S S T T H S O H S S T D D H H S T S H H D T H T N S 1 H T T R N T T H H R S T 6 D 1 H 1 4 8 T 3 T 2 0 A 4 T T 3 8 3 T * 1 5 N S 2 H 2 3 6 8 3 V * T 0 3 2 T * 2 2 O 4 S 2 7 R 10A B A AR 3 T RE T TT T A T S V S S A MAC DONALD AV S N E H C V IN D T A V T R T S 80 9 T 3 BISSELL AV S 3 1 4 S R 4 R H H T F T 6 6TH ST 8TH ST 1ST ST S 8 1 N W OHIO AV 1 B OHIO AV CENTER AV FLORIDA AV * * * * * MAINE AV WALL AVE * * * C 580 S 7TH ST A VIRGINIA AV R S 2ND ST L W. CUTTING BLVD S CUTTING BLVD O N B POTRERO AVE L V D S a n t a S F S 4TH ST P e * WRIGHT AV T POTRERO AVE T C C S h F a O R n A n R H e R W l PIERSON AV HARBOR WAY S. DR 580 C H F MARINA WY S. F A LI N a C r V A A A E L b HALL AV S B o N L A V r N D R C O Richmond D h a Marina n n Bay e l Ford Channel PROJECT SITE Point Potrero r b o r I n n e r H a R i c h m o n d San Pablo Bay 0 300 600 1200 PINOLE FEET P a c i SITE f i S a c n F r O a n c c i e s c a o n B a y Figure 1 Site Location Source: Douglas Herring & Associates Maine Ave Harbour Way Marina Way Cutting Blvd 23rd St 580 Wright Ave RICHMOND Harbor Channel Marina Way Regatta Blvd Harbour Way PROJECT LOCATION Inner Harbor Basin Richmond Inner Harbor 0 1000 Feet Figure 2 Aerial Overview of Site and Surroundings Source: Google Earth 0 200 FEET Figure 3 Site Plan Source: BKF will be used as a parking lot serving the planned future ferry terminal at the southern end of Harbour Way South. Gated entrances to the site are located near the northern and southern ends of the site. A small guard house is located at the southern entrance, with a small three- story administration building located about 180 feet north of the guard house. A truck scale is located along the east side of the administration building. A large one-story corrugated metal warehouse building is located along the eastern edge of the Terminal 3 site. This flat-roofed building is 800 feet long and has a floor area of approximately 88,000 square feet. A recently-installed shoreline 480-volt, three-phase power terminal is located at the edge of the ship berth. This terminal provides power to ships while they are docked at Terminal 3 so they don’t need to idle the ship engines for power. The remainder of the site consists of asphalt pavements. Proposed Operations The proposed facility would receive logs both with and without bark. Logs without bark would arrive by truck from an RJJ site in West Sacramento. Loaded trucks would enter the facility through the northern gated entrance to Terminal 3, and would first be weighed by staff at the truck scales at the southeastern corner of the site. Trucks would then proceed to the Debarked Logs Deck area shown on Figure 3, where crews would unload the logs using a front loader, stacking them in piles not to exceed 25 feet in height. The unloaded trucks would be weighed again prior to departing from the site in order to determine the weight of the unloaded logs. It would take approximately 15 minutes to unload each truck. Logs would remain stockpiled in this area until ready for shipment; they would generally be stockpiled for no longer than one month. Logs arriving with bark still on would also be weighed upon arrival at Terminal 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay
    Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay Final Report Prepared for California Department of Fish & Game Oil Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR) 425 G Executive Court North Fairfield, CA 94534-4019 Prepared by Dagmar Schmidt Etkin, PhD Environmental Research Consulting 41 Croft Lane Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567-1160 SSEP Contract No. P0775013 30 September 2009 Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay Final Report Prepared by Dagmar Schmidt Etkin, PhD Environmental Research Consulting 41 Croft Lane Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567-1160 USA Prepared at the Request of Carl Jochums California Department of Fish & Game Oil Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR) 425 G Executive Court North Fairfield, CA 94534-4019 Submitted to Bruce Joab, SSEP Coordinator and Contract Manager Office of Spill Prevention and Response CA Department of Fish and Game 1700 K Street, Suite 250 Sacramento, CA 95811 Phone 916-322-7561 SSEP Contract No. PO775013 Note: This study was conducted in collaboration with Applied Science Associates (ASA), Inc., of South Kingston, RI, under SSEP Contract No. PO775010. ASA submitted a separate Final Report entitled Transport and Impacts of Oil Spills in San Francisco Bay – Implications for Response. i Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority
    Steering Committee Draft | Ocotber 2020 Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority Steering Committee Draft | Ocotber 2020 Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority Prepared By: 1625 Shattuck Avenue Suite 300 Berkeley, California 94709 510.848.3815 ORANGE COUNTY • BAY AREA • SACRAMENTO • CENTRAL COAST • LOS ANGELES • INLAND EMPIRE • SAN DIEGO www.placeworks.com Table of Contents List of Figures & Tables ii Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 13 1.1 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Lifeline Transportation Program 13 1.2 CBTP Guidelines 14 1.3 2004 Richmond-Area CBTP 15 1.4 Current Richmond Area CBTP 15 1.5 COVID-19 and CBTP Development 17 2. Study Area Profile 18 2.1 Demographic Analysis 18 2.2 Transportation Patterns 24 2.3 Transportation Network 28 3. Previous Studies and Mobility Gaps 33 3.1 Local Studies 33 3.2 Countywide Studies 37 3.3 Current Studies 39 3.4 Thematic Mobility Challenges 40 4. Outreach and Engagement Summary 43 4.1 CBTP Advisor Groups 43 4.2 Outreach Strategy 44 4.3 Outreach Awareness 44 4.4 Outreach Results 46 4.5 Outreach Summary 54 5. Methodology and Recommendations 56 5.1 COVID-19 and CBTP Development 56 5.2 Evaluation Criteria 57 5.3 Evaluation Process 60 5.4 Recommended Projects and Plans 62 Appendix A Existing Conditions Report Appendix B Outreach Materials and Results Appendix C Recommendations Scoring Results Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan i Contra Costa Transportation Authority List of Figures
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Packet Is Available for Download at Weta.Sanfranciscobayferry.Com
    Members of the Board SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA WATER EMERGENCY TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY James Wunderman, Chair BOARD OF DIRECTORS SPECIAL MEETING Jessica Alba Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 1:00 p.m. Jeffrey DelBono Anthony J. Intintoli, Jr. VIDEOCONFERENCE Monique Moyer Join WETA BOD Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89718217408 Meeting ID: 897 1821 7408 Password: 33779 Dial by your location +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) The full agenda packet is available for download at weta.sanfranciscobayferry.com AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVE FY 2022-2024 TITLE VI PROGRAM Action 4. PRELIMINARY FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 OPERATING AND CAPITAL Information BUDGETS 5. WETA BUSINESS PLAN CONCEPT AND ORGANIZATION Information ADJOURNMENT All items appearing on the agenda are subject to action by the Board of Directors. Staff recommendations are subject to action and change by the Board of Directors. CHANGES RELATED TO COVID-19 Consistent with Governor Gavin Newsom’s Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20, effective immediately and until further notice, meetings will be conducted through virtual participation to promote social distancing and reduce the chance of COVID-19 transmission. PUBLIC COMMENTS As this is a special meeting of the Board, public comments are limited to the listed agenda items. If you know in advance that you would like to make a public comment during the videoconference, please email [email protected] with your name and item number you would like to provide comment on no later than 15 Water Emergency Transportation Authority May 20, 2021 Meeting of the Board of Directors minutes after the start of the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • West Contra Costa/Albany Transit Wayfinding Plan
    FINAL WEST CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT ENHANCEMENT STRATEGIC PLAN and WEST CONTRA COSTA/ALBANY TRANSIT WAYFINDING PLAN Prepared for: West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee October 2011 Acknowledgements WCCTAC BOARD City of El Cerrito Janet Abelson, Vice Chair City of Hercules Donald Kuehne City of Pinole Roy Swearingen, Chair City of Richmond Courtland “Corky” Boozé City of Richmond Thomas Butt City of Richmond Jeff Ritterman City of San Pablo Genoveva Calloway AC Transit Joe Wallace BART Joel Keller WestCAT Tom Hansen Contra Costa County John Gioia WCCTAC STAFF Christina Atienza, Executive Director Linda Young John Rudolph Joanna Pollock WCCTAC WORKING GROUP City of El Cerrito Yvetteh Ortiz City of Hercules Robert Reber City of Pinole Winston Rhodes City of Richmond Chad Smalley, Hector Rojas, Steven Tam City of San Pablo Kanwal Sandhu, Adele Ho AC Transit Nathan Landau, Puja Sarna, Aaron Priven BART Diedre Heitman WestCAT Rob Thompson Contra Costa County Jamar Stamps MTC Jay Stagi CONSULTANT TEAM Fehr & Peers Nelson/Nygaard Bob Grandy (Project Manager) Linda Rhine Brooke DuBose (Deputy PM) Joey Goldman Matthew Ridgway Meghan Mitman Studio L’Image Ellen Poling Sue Labouvie Josh Peterman Max Heim Steve Rhyne Carrie Carsell Eisen Letunic Nikki Hervol Niko Letunic Nikki Foletta table of contents I Introduction II Study Locations III Community Participation IV Travel Demand Management & Parking Strategies V Richmond BART Transit Center Enhancement Strategies VI Richmond Parkway Transit Center Enhancement Strategies VII El Cerrito Del
    [Show full text]
  • 6284 SAN PABLO DAM Single-Family Residential EL SOBRANTE | CALIFORNIA 7 Lots | 2.57 Acres OFFERING MEMORANDUM
    Final Map Ready 6284 SAN PABLO DAM Single-Family Residential EL SOBRANTE | CALIFORNIA 7 Lots | 2.57 Acres OFFERING MEMORANDUM Accelerating success. DISCLAIMER STATEMENT This Offering Memorandum (“Memorandum”) was prepared by Colliers International (“Colliers”) as part of Collier’s efforts to market for sale the real property commonly known as 6284 San Pablo Dam Road, El Sobrante (the “Property”). Colliers is the exclusive agent and broker for the owner of the Property (the “Owner”). Colliers is providing this Memorandum and the material contained in it to prospective buyer (each a “Buyer”) solely to assist Buyer in determining whether Buyer is interested in potentially purchasing all or part of the Property. Colliers is also providing this Memorandum and the material in it to Buyer with the understanding that Buyer will independently investigate those matters that it deems necessary and appropriate to evaluate the Property and that Buyer will rely only on its own investigation, and not on Colliers, the Owner, or this Memorandum, in determining whether or not to purchase the Property. This Memorandum is a solicitation of interest only and is not an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, an interest in the Property. Owner expressly reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to reject any or all expressions of interest or offers to purchase the Property and expressly reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate discussions with any potential Buyer at any time with or without notice. Owner shall have no legal commitment or obligation to any party reviewing the Memorandum or making an offer to purchase the Property unless and until a written real estate purchase and sale agreement is executed by Owner and Buyer.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Packet Is Available for Download at Weta.Sanfranciscobayferry.Com
    Members of the Board SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA WATER EMERGENCY TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY James Wunderman, Chair BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Jessica Alba Thursday, November 5, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. Jeffrey DelBono Anthony J. Intintoli, Jr. VIDEOCONFERENCE Monique Moyer Join WETA BOD Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86947227244 Meeting ID: 869 4722 7244 Password: 33779 Dial by your location +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 929 205 6099 US (New York) The full agenda packet is available for download at weta.sanfranciscobayferry.com AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. REPORT OF BOARD CHAIR Information a. Chair’s Verbal Report 4. REPORTS OF DIRECTORS Information Directors are limited to providing information, asking clarifying questions about matters not on the agenda, responding to public comment, referring matters to committee or staff for information, or requesting a report to be made at another meeting. 5. REPORTS OF STAFF Information a. Executive Director’s Report on Agency Projects, Activities and Services b. Monthly Review of Financial Statements c. Federal Legislative Update d. State Legislative Update e. Monthly Ridership and Recovery Report 6. CONSENT CALENDAR Action a. Board Meeting Minutes – October 8, 2020 7. APPROVE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULE FOR Action CALENDAR YEAR 2021 8. NOVEMBER 2020 REDUCED FARE PROMOTION PROGRAM UPDATE Information/ Action Water Emergency Transportation Authority November 5, 2020 Meeting of the Board of Directors 9. RECEIVE REDWOOD CITY FERRY FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY & Action COST-BENEFIT AND ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSES REPORT 10. RECESS INTO CLOSED SESSION Information/ a. Public Employment Action Pursuant to Government Code Sections 54957 Title: Executive Director 11.
    [Show full text]
  • 50K Course Guide
    50K COURSE GUIDE IMPORTANT UPDATES (11/02/2017) • NEW COURSE MODIFICATION - Old Inn to Muir Beach • New 2017 Start & Finish Locations • On-Course Nutrition Information • UPDATED Crew and spectator information RACE DAY CHECKLIST PRE-RACE PREPARATION • Review the shuttle and parking information on the website and make a plan for your transportation to the start area. Allow extra time if you are required or planning to take a shuttle. • Locate crew- and spectator-accessible Aid Stations on the course map and inform your family/friends where they can see you on-course. Review the crew and spectator information section of this guide for crew rules and transportation options. • If your distance allows, make a plan with your pacer to meet you at a designated pacer aid station. Review the pacer information section of this guide for pacer rules and transportation options. • Locate the designated drop bag aid stations and prepare a gear bag for the specific drop bag location(s). Review the drop bag information section of this guide for more information regarding on-course drop bag processes and policies. • Pick up your bib and timing device at a designated packet pickup location. • Attend the Pre-Race Panel Discussion for last-minute questions and advice from TNF Athletes and the Race Director. • Check the weather forecast and plan clothing and extra supplies accordingly for both you and your friends/family attending the race and Finish Festival. It is typically colder at the Start/Finish area than it is in the city. • Make sure to have a hydration and fuel plan in place to ensure you are properly nourished throughout your race.
    [Show full text]
  • Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents to Discover the Past and Imagine the Future
    Winter 2014-2015 LaThe Journal of the SanPeninsula Mateo County Historical Association, Volume xliii, No. 1 Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents To discover the past and imagine the future. Is it Time for a Portolá Trail Designation in San Mateo County? ....................... 3 by Paul O. Reimer, P.E. Our Mission Development of Foster City: A Photo Essay .................................................... 15 To enrich, excite and by T. Jack Foster, Jr. educate through understanding, preserving The San Mateo County Historical Association Board of Directors and interpreting the history Paul Barulich, Chairman; Barbara Pierce, Vice Chairwoman; Shawn DeLuna, Secretary; of San Mateo County. Dee Tolles, Treasurer; Thomas Ames; Alpio Barbara; Keith Bautista; Sandra McLellan Behling; John Blake; Elaine Breeze; David Canepa; Tracy De Leuw; Dee Eva; Ted Everett; Accredited Pat Hawkins; Mark Jamison; Peggy Bort Jones; Doug Keyston; John LaTorra; Joan by the American Alliance Levy; Emmet W. MacCorkle; Karen S. McCown; Nick Marikian; Olivia Garcia Martinez; Gene Mullin; Bob Oyster; Patrick Ryan; Paul Shepherd; John Shroyer; Bill Stronck; of Museums. Joseph Welch III; Shawn White and Mitchell P. Postel, President. President’s Advisory Board Albert A. Acena; Arthur H. Bredenbeck; John Clinton; Robert M. Desky; T. Jack Foster, The San Mateo County Jr.; Umang Gupta; Greg Munks; Phill Raiser; Cynthia L. Schreurs and John Schrup. Historical Association Leadership Council operates the San Mateo John C. Adams, Wells Fargo; Jenny Johnson, Franklin Templeton Investments; Barry County History Museum Jolette, San Mateo Credit Union and Paul Shepherd, Cargill. and Archives at the old San Mateo County Courthouse La Peninsula located in Redwood City, Carmen J.
    [Show full text]
  • Contra Costa County
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Marsh Creek Watershed Marsh Creek flows approximately 30 miles from the eastern slopes of Mt. Diablo to Suisun Bay in the northern San Francisco Estuary. Its watershed consists of about 100 square miles. The headwaters of Marsh Creek consist of numerous small, intermittent and perennial tributaries within the Black Hills. The creek drains to the northwest before abruptly turning east near Marsh Creek Springs. From Marsh Creek Springs, Marsh Creek flows in an easterly direction entering Marsh Creek Reservoir, constructed in the 1960s. The creek is largely channelized in the lower watershed, and includes a drop structure near the city of Brentwood that appears to be a complete passage barrier. Marsh Creek enters the Big Break area of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta northeast of the city of Oakley. Marsh Creek No salmonids were observed by DFG during an April 1942 visual survey of Marsh Creek at two locations: 0.25 miles upstream from the mouth in a tidal reach, and in close proximity to a bridge four miles east of Byron (Curtis 1942).
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California California clapper rail Suaeda californica Cirsium hydrophilum Chloropyron molle Salt marsh harvest mouse (Rallus longirostris (California sea-blite) var. hydrophilum ssp. molle (Reithrodontomys obsoletus) (Suisun thistle) (soft bird’s-beak) raviventris) Volume II Appendices Tidal marsh at China Camp State Park. VII. APPENDICES Appendix A Species referred to in this recovery plan……………....…………………….3 Appendix B Recovery Priority Ranking System for Endangered and Threatened Species..........................................................................................................11 Appendix C Species of Concern or Regional Conservation Significance in Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California….......................................13 Appendix D Agencies, organizations, and websites involved with tidal marsh Recovery.................................................................................................... 189 Appendix E Environmental contaminants in San Francisco Bay...................................193 Appendix F Population Persistence Modeling for Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California with Intial Application to California clapper rail …............................................................................209 Appendix G Glossary……………......................................................................………229 Appendix H Summary of Major Public Comments and Service
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Guard, DHS § 165.1190
    Coast Guard, DHS § 165.1190 include toxic or flammable properties sonnel. Patrol personnel comprise com- or a combination of both. missioned, warrant, and petty officers (c) Regulations. All vessels loaded of the Coast Guard onboard Coast with a cargo of liquefied hazardous gas Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, local, (LHG) within this Regulated Naviga- state, and federal law enforcement ves- tion Area must proceed directly to sels. Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast their intended cargo reception facility Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio, to discharge their LHG cargo, unless: flashing light, or other means, the op- (1) The vessel is otherwise directed or erator of a vessel shall proceed as di- permitted by the Captain of the Port. rected. The Captain of the Port can be reached [COTP San Francisco Bay 03–029, 69 FR 11316, at telephone number (415) 399–3547 or on Mar. 10, 2004] VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). If per- mission is granted, all persons and ves- § 165.1190 Security Zone; San Fran- sels must comply with the instructions cisco Bay, Oakland Estuary, Ala- of the Captain of the Port or his or her meda, CA. designated representative. (a) Location. The following area is a (2) The vessel is in an emergency sit- security zone: All navigable waters of uation and unable to proceed as di- the Oakland Estuary, California, from rected in paragraph (a) of this section the surface to the sea floor, approxi- without endangering the safety of per- mately 50 yards into the Oakland Estu- sons, property, or the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Marina Bay Trail Guide San Francisco Bay Trail Richmond, California
    Marina Bay Trail Guide San Francisco Bay Trail Richmond, California Rosie the Riveter / World War Il Home Front National Historical Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the !nterior Richmond, California i-l i I 2.'l mito i iPoint Richmond RICIJMOND MARIN.A BAY TRAIL n A century ago Marina Bay u)as a land that dissolueMnto tidal marsh at the edge(r+ \ i, \ of the great estuary we call San Froncisco Bay. One-could find shell mounds left sY by the Huchiun tribe of natiue Ohlone and watclt'""Soiting aessels ply the bay with Y ,J_r ' ,# + passengers and cargo. The arriual of Standard Off ond the Sonta Fe Railrood at q the beginning of the 20th century sparked a transformatioryffitnis hndscope that continues &, Y $ Harbor Mt today. The Marina Bay segment of the San Francisco Bay lfuit Offers us neu opportunities @EGIE to explore the history, wildlife, and scenery of Richmondffilynamic southesstern shore. Future site of Rosie the Riveterl WWll Home Front National Historical Park Visitor Center Map Legend Sheridan Point r ,.' B ft EIE .. Bay Trail suitable for walking, biking, roller skating & wheelchair access ? V Distance markers and mileage #g.9--o--,,t,* betweentwomarkers Ford Assembly MARI Stair access to San Francisco Bay Building ) Built in 1930, the Richmond Ford RICHMO Home Front tr visitor lnformation Motor Co. Plant was the largest Iucretia RICHMOND lnterpretive Markers assembly plant on the West Coast. t Edwards \ During WWII, it switched to the |,|[lil Restrooms Historical markers throughout the \ @EtrM@ Marina are easy to spot from a assembly of combat vehicles.
    [Show full text]