DOCSLIB.ORG

Radial Velocity Prospects Current and Future a White Paper Report Prepared by the Study Analysis Group 8 for the Exoplanet Program Analysis Group (Exopag)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Radial Velocity Prospects Current and Future a White Paper Report Prepared by the Study Analysis Group 8 for the Exoplanet Program Analysis Group (Exopag) Radial Velocity Prospects Current and Future A White Paper Report prepared by the Study Analysis Group 8 for the Exoplanet Program Analysis Group (ExoPAG) Contributing Authors: Peter Plavchan Missouri State University, Dave Latham Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Radial Velocity Study Analysis Group co-chairs and ExoPAG Executive Committee members, Scott Gaudi Ohio State University, ExoPAG Executive Committee Chair, Justin Crepp Notre Dame, Dumusque Xavier Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Gabor Furesz MIT, Andrew Vanderburg Harvard University, Cullen Blake University of Pennsylvania, Debra Fischer Yale University, Lisa Prato Lowell Observatory, Russel White Georgia State University, Valeri Makarov U.S. Naval Observatory, Geoff Marcy University of California, Berkeley, Karl Stapelfeldt NASA Goddard, Raphaëlle Haywood St Andrews University, Andrew Collier-Cameron St Andrews University, Andreas Quirrenbach University of Heidelberg, Suvrath Mahadevan Penn State University, Guillem Anglada Queen Mary, University of London, Philip Muirhead Boston University 1 1. Table of Contents 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 2 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 4 3. NASA PROGRAMMATIC CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................................. 7 3.1 KEPLER AND K2 .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 TESS AND JWST ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 3.3 FUTURE SPACE-BASED DIRECT IMAGING MISSIONS ...................................................................................................... 9 4 ANALYSIS: GROUND-BASED TELESCOPE RESOURCES NECESSARY TO MEET NASA OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 4.1 DEFINITION OF DOPPLER PRECISION .......................................................................................................................... 14 4.2 SURVEY SIMULATIONS .................................................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.1 TESS and Exo-C Target Samples ....................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.2 K Semi-amplitude Sensitivity .............................................................................................................................. 15 4.2.3 Choice of Telescope Aperture .............................................................................................................................. 15 4.2.4 Survey Simulation Parameters .......................................................................................................................... 16 4.2.5 Is a minimum of 10 observations per target realistic? ............................................................................ 19 4.2.6 Survey Simulation Results and Discussion .................................................................................................... 21 4.2.7 Summary Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................ 31 4.3 NIR AND/OR VISIBLE .................................................................................................................................................... 31 4.3.1. The spectral type and wavelength dependence of RV photon noise ................................................. 32 4.3.2. The spectral type and wavelength dependence of stellar jitter .......................................................... 36 4.3.3. Combining photon noise and stellar jitter as a function of spectral type and wavelength .... 40 4.3.4. Summary Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................... 45 4.4 SEEING OR DIFFRACTION LIMITED ............................................................................................................................... 46 5. EXOPLANET SCIENCE OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................................... 47 5.1 A SUMMARY OF THE HISTORICAL RELEVANCE OF PRVS TO THE EXOPLANET FIELD ........................................ 47 5.2 ASTROPHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS ON THE RADIAL VELOCITY METHOD .................................................................... 49 5.2.1 Stellar Activity Features and Time-Scales .................................................................................................... 50 5.2.2 Spectroscopic Properties of Stellar Jitter ...................................................................................................... 55 5.2.3 Wavelength Dependence ...................................................................................................................................... 55 5.2.4 Photometric Correlation ....................................................................................................................................... 56 5.2.5 Time-scale Dependence on Stellar Parameters .......................................................................................... 57 5.2.6 The Sun in Context ................................................................................................................................................... 58 5.3 RADIAL-VELOCITY SURVEYS IN THE RED AND NEAR-INFRARED ........................................................................... 59 5.4 YOUNG STARS, ACTIVE STARS ....................................................................................................................................... 62 6 INSTRUMENTATION OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 65 6.1 CURRENT OR PLANNED SPECTROGRAPHS .................................................................................................................. 65 6.1.1 Visible Spectrometers ............................................................................................................................................. 66 6.1.2 Red/Near-Infrared Spectrographs ................................................................................................................... 68 2 6.2 WAVELENGTH CALIBRATION ........................................................................................................................................ 69 6.2.1 Common Optical Path ............................................................................................................................................ 69 6.2.2 Non-Common Optical Path .................................................................................................................................. 72 6.3 SPECTROGRAPH ILLUMINATION AND STABILIZATION .............................................................................................. 74 6.4 DIFFRACTION LIMITED PRV SPECTROGRAPHS ......................................................................................................... 83 7. U.S. COMMUNITY INPUT ............................................................................................................................. 88 7.1 NASA SCIENCE OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................................................................... 88 7.2 EXEP PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 88 7.3 2010 DECADAL SURVEY ................................................................................................................................................ 88 7.4 NSF PORTFOLIO REVIEW .............................................................................................................................................. 89 7.6 2011 PENN STATE RV WORKSHOP ............................................................................................................................ 90 7.7 2008 EXOPLANET COMMUNITY REPORT RV CHAPTER .......................................................................................... 91 7.8 2008 EXOPLANET TASK FORCE REPORT ................................................................................................................... 92 8. ACRONYMS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................ 94 9. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................... 96 3 2. Executive Summary In this white paper report, we present an assessment of the current capabilities and the future potential of the precise radial velocity (PRV) method to advance the NASA goal to “search for planetary bodies and Earth-like planets in orbit around other stars.” (U.S. National Space Policy, June
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
    [Show full text]
  • Metallicity, Debris Discs and Planets J
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. (2005) doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09848.x Metallicity, debris discs and planets J. S. Greaves,1 D. A. Fischer 2 and M. C. Wyatt3 1School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SS 2Department of Astronomy, University of California at Berkeley, 601 Campbell Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 3UK Astronomy Technology Centre, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ Accepted 2005 November 10. Received 2005 November 10; in original form 2005 July 5 ABSTRACT We investigate the populations of main-sequence stars within 25 pc that have debris discs and/or giant planets detected by Doppler shift. The metallicity distribution of the debris sample is a very close match to that of stars in general, but differs with >99 per cent confidence from the giant planet sample, which favours stars of above average metallicity. This result is not due to differences in age of the two samples. The formation of debris-generating planetesimals at tens of au thus appears independent of the metal fraction of the primordial disc, in contrast to the growth and migration history of giant planets within a few au. The data generally fit a core accumulation model, with outer planetesimals forming eventually even from a disc low in solids, while inner planets require fast core growth for gas to still be present to make an atmosphere. Keywords: circumstellar matter – planetary systems: formation – planetary systems: proto- planetary discs. dust that is seen in thermal emission in the far-infrared (FIR) by IRAS 1 INTRODUCTION and the Infrared Space Observatory (ISO).
    [Show full text]
  • Where Are the Distant Worlds? Star Maps
    W here Are the Distant Worlds? Star Maps Abo ut the Activity Whe re are the distant worlds in the night sky? Use a star map to find constellations and to identify stars with extrasolar planets. (Northern Hemisphere only, naked eye) Topics Covered • How to find Constellations • Where we have found planets around other stars Participants Adults, teens, families with children 8 years and up If a school/youth group, 10 years and older 1 to 4 participants per map Materials Needed Location and Timing • Current month's Star Map for the Use this activity at a star party on a public (included) dark, clear night. Timing depends only • At least one set Planetary on how long you want to observe. Postcards with Key (included) • A small (red) flashlight • (Optional) Print list of Visible Stars with Planets (included) Included in This Packet Page Detailed Activity Description 2 Helpful Hints 4 Background Information 5 Planetary Postcards 7 Key Planetary Postcards 9 Star Maps 20 Visible Stars With Planets 33 © 2008 Astronomical Society of the Pacific www.astrosociety.org Copies for educational purposes are permitted. Additional astronomy activities can be found here: http://nightsky.jpl.nasa.gov Detailed Activity Description Leader’s Role Participants’ Roles (Anticipated) Introduction: To Ask: Who has heard that scientists have found planets around stars other than our own Sun? How many of these stars might you think have been found? Anyone ever see a star that has planets around it? (our own Sun, some may know of other stars) We can’t see the planets around other stars, but we can see the star.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tierras Observatory: an Ultra-Precise Photometer to Characterize Nearby Terrestrial Exoplanets
    The Tierras Observatory: An ultra-precise photometer to characterize nearby terrestrial exoplanets Juliana Garc´ıa-Mej´ıaa, David Charbonneaua, Daniel Fabricanta, Jonathan M. Irwina, Robert Fataa, Joseph M. Zajaca, and Peter E. Dohertya aCenter for Astrophysics Harvard and Smithsonian, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge MA j ABSTRACT We report on the status of the Tierras Observatory, a refurbished 1.3-m ultra-precise fully-automated photometer located at the F. L. Whipple Observatory atop Mt. Hopkins, Arizona. Tierras is designed to limit systematic errors, notably precipitable water vapor (PWV), to 250 ppm, enabling the characterization of terrestrial planet transits orbiting < 0:3 R stars, as well as the potential discovery of exo-moons and exo-rings. The design choices that will enable our science goals include: a four-lens focal reducer and field-flattener to increase the field-of-view of the telescope from a 11:940 to a 0:48◦ side; a custom narrow bandpass (40:2 nm FWHM) filter centered around 863:5 nm to minimize PWV errors known to limit ground-based photometry of red dwarfs; and a deep-depletion 4K 4K CCD with a 300ke- full well and QE> 85% in our bandpass, operating in frame transfer mode. We are also× pursuing the design of a set of baffles to minimize the significant amount of scattered light reaching the image plane. Tierras will begin science operations in early 2021. Keywords: ultra-precise photometry, terrestrial planet detection, exoplanet instrumentation, transit method 1. INTRODUCTION The construction of observatories tailor-built to routinely achieve precise photometry from the ground is mo- tivated by the multitude of exoplanetary and stellar phenomena whose exploration will be enabled with high- cadence, ultra-precise time series of diverse stellar targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Distances and Absolute Ages of Galactic Globular Clusters From
    651 DISTANCES AND ABSOLUTE AGES OF GALACTIC GLOBULAR CLUSTERS FROM HIPPARCOS PARALLAXES OF LOCAL SUBDWARFS 1 2;3 2 2 4 5 R.G. Gratton ,F.Fusi Pecci , E. Carretta , G. Clementini , C.E. Corsi , M.G. Lattanzi 1 Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy 2 Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, Via Zamb oni 33, 40126 Bologna, Italy 3 Stazione Astronomica, 09012 Cap oterra, Cagliari, Italy 4 Osservatorio Astronomico di Monte Mario, Via del Parco Mellini 84, 00136 Roma, Italy 5 Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino, Strada Osservatorio 20, 10025 Pino Torinese, Italy +5 ABSTRACT 1996; t =15 Gyr, VandenBerg et al. 1996. These 3 values are in con ict with the age of the Universe derived from the most recent estimates of the Hub- High precision trigonometric parallaxes from the ble constant and the standard cosmological Eistein- Hipparcos satellite and accurate metal abundances de Sitter mo del. Since, most recent determinations 1 1 [Fe/H], [O/Fe], and [ /Fe] from high resolution of H are in the range of 55 75 km s Mp c 0 sp ectroscopy for ab out 30 lo cal sub dwarfs have b een H = 73 10 km/s/Mp c, Freedman et al. 1997; 0 used to derive distances and ages for a carefully se- H =63:13:42:9 km/s/Mp c, Hamuy et al. 1996; 0 lected sample of nine globular clusters. We nd H =587 km/s/Mp c, Saha et al. 1997, H =567 0 0 that Hipparcos parallaxes are smaller than the cor- km/s/Mp c, Sandage & Tamman 1997, the age of resp onding ground-based measurements leading, to the Universe is constrained to be t < 11:6 Gyr in a longer distance scale 0:2 mag and to ages an Einstein-de Sitter mo del, and t<14:9 Gyr in a 2:8 Gyr younger.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Velocity Field from Type Ia Supernovae in an LSST-Like Sky
    Prepared for submission to JCAP Measuring the velocity field from type Ia supernovae in an LSST-like sky survey Io Odderskov,a Steen Hannestada aDepartment of Physics and Astronomy University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade, Aarhus C, Denmark E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. In a few years, the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope will vastly increase the number of type Ia supernovae observed in the local universe. This will allow for a precise mapping of the velocity field and, since the source of peculiar velocities is variations in the density field, cosmological parameters related to the matter distribution can subsequently be extracted from the velocity power spectrum. One way to quantify this is through the angular power spectrum of radial peculiar velocities on spheres at different redshifts. We investigate how well this observable can be measured, despite the problems caused by areas with no information. To obtain a realistic distribution of supernovae, we create mock supernova catalogs by using a semi-analytical code for galaxy formation on the merger trees extracted from N-body simulations. We measure the cosmic variance in the velocity power spectrum by repeating the procedure many times for differently located observers, and vary several aspects of the analysis, such as the observer environment, to see how this affects the measurements. Our results confirm the findings from earlier studies regarding the precision with which the angular velocity power spectrum can be determined in the near future. This level of precision has been found to imply, that the angular velocity power spectrum from type Ia supernovae is competitive in its potential to measure parameters such as σ8.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maunder Minimum and the Variable Sun-Earth Connection
    The Maunder Minimum and the Variable Sun-Earth Connection (Front illustration: the Sun without spots, July 27, 1954) By Willie Wei-Hock Soon and Steven H. Yaskell To Soon Gim-Chuan, Chua Chiew-See, Pham Than (Lien+Van’s mother) and Ulla and Anna In Memory of Miriam Fuchs (baba Gil’s mother)---W.H.S. In Memory of Andrew Hoff---S.H.Y. To interrupt His Yellow Plan The Sun does not allow Caprices of the Atmosphere – And even when the Snow Heaves Balls of Specks, like Vicious Boy Directly in His Eye – Does not so much as turn His Head Busy with Majesty – ‘Tis His to stimulate the Earth And magnetize the Sea - And bind Astronomy, in place, Yet Any passing by Would deem Ourselves – the busier As the Minutest Bee That rides – emits a Thunder – A Bomb – to justify Emily Dickinson (poem 224. c. 1862) Since people are by nature poorly equipped to register any but short-term changes, it is not surprising that we fail to notice slower changes in either climate or the sun. John A. Eddy, The New Solar Physics (1977-78) Foreword By E. N. Parker In this time of global warming we are impelled by both the anticipated dire consequences and by scientific curiosity to investigate the factors that drive the climate. Climate has fluctuated strongly and abruptly in the past, with ice ages and interglacial warming as the long term extremes. Historical research in the last decades has shown short term climatic transients to be a frequent occurrence, often imposing disastrous hardship on the afflicted human populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanet.Eu Catalog Page 1 # Name Mass Star Name
    exoplanet.eu_catalog # name mass star_name star_distance star_mass OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L b 13.6 OGLE-2016-BLG-1469L 4500.0 0.048 11 Com b 19.4 11 Com 110.6 2.7 11 Oph b 21 11 Oph 145.0 0.0162 11 UMi b 10.5 11 UMi 119.5 1.8 14 And b 5.33 14 And 76.4 2.2 14 Her b 4.64 14 Her 18.1 0.9 16 Cyg B b 1.68 16 Cyg B 21.4 1.01 18 Del b 10.3 18 Del 73.1 2.3 1RXS 1609 b 14 1RXS1609 145.0 0.73 1SWASP J1407 b 20 1SWASP J1407 133.0 0.9 24 Sex b 1.99 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 24 Sex c 0.86 24 Sex 74.8 1.54 2M 0103-55 (AB) b 13 2M 0103-55 (AB) 47.2 0.4 2M 0122-24 b 20 2M 0122-24 36.0 0.4 2M 0219-39 b 13.9 2M 0219-39 39.4 0.11 2M 0441+23 b 7.5 2M 0441+23 140.0 0.02 2M 0746+20 b 30 2M 0746+20 12.2 0.12 2M 1207-39 24 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1207-39 b 4 2M 1207-39 52.4 0.025 2M 1938+46 b 1.9 2M 1938+46 0.6 2M 2140+16 b 20 2M 2140+16 25.0 0.08 2M 2206-20 b 30 2M 2206-20 26.7 0.13 2M 2236+4751 b 12.5 2M 2236+4751 63.0 0.6 2M J2126-81 b 13.3 TYC 9486-927-1 24.8 0.4 2MASS J11193254 AB 3.7 2MASS J11193254 AB 2MASS J1450-7841 A 40 2MASS J1450-7841 A 75.0 0.04 2MASS J1450-7841 B 40 2MASS J1450-7841 B 75.0 0.04 2MASS J2250+2325 b 30 2MASS J2250+2325 41.5 30 Ari B b 9.88 30 Ari B 39.4 1.22 38 Vir b 4.51 38 Vir 1.18 4 Uma b 7.1 4 Uma 78.5 1.234 42 Dra b 3.88 42 Dra 97.3 0.98 47 Uma b 2.53 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma c 0.54 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 47 Uma d 1.64 47 Uma 14.0 1.03 51 Eri b 9.1 51 Eri 29.4 1.75 51 Peg b 0.47 51 Peg 14.7 1.11 55 Cnc b 0.84 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc c 0.1784 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc d 3.86 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc e 0.02547 55 Cnc 12.3 0.905 55 Cnc f 0.1479 55
    [Show full text]
  • Observing Exoplanets
    Observing Exoplanets Olivier Guyon University of Arizona Astrobiology Center, National Institutes for Natural Sciences (NINS) Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, National Institutes for Natural Sciences (NINS) Nov 29, 2017 My Background Astronomer / Optical scientist at University of Arizona and Subaru Telescope (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Telescope located in Hawaii) I develop instrumentation to find and study exoplanet, for ground-based telescopes and space missions My interest is focused on habitable planets and search for life outside our solar system At Subaru Telescope, I lead the Subaru Coronagraphic Extreme Adaptive Optics (SCExAO) instrument. 2 ALL known Planets until 1989 Approximately 10% of stars have a potentially habitable planet 200 billion stars in our galaxy → approximately 20 billion habitable planets Imagine 200 explorers, each spending 20s on each habitable planet, 24hr a day, 7 days a week. It would take >60yr to explore all habitable planets in our galaxy alone. x 100,000,000,000 galaxies in the observable universe Habitable planets Potentially habitable planet : – Planet mass sufficiently large to retain atmosphere, but sufficiently low to avoid becoming gaseous giant – Planet distance to star allows surface temperature suitable for liquid water (habitable zone) Habitable zone = zone within which Earth-like planet could harbor life Location of habitable zone is function of star luminosity L. For constant stellar flux, distance to star scales as L1/2 Examples: Sun → habitable zone is at ~1 AU Rigel (B type star) Proxima Centauri (M type star) Habitable planets Potentially habitable planet : – Planet mass sufficiently large to retain atmosphere, but sufficiently low to avoid becoming gaseous giant – Planet distance to star allows surface temperature suitable for liquid water (habitable zone) Habitable zone = zone within which Earth-like planet could harbor life Location of habitable zone is function of star luminosity L.
    [Show full text]
  • 121012-AAS-221 Program-14-ALL, Page 253 @ Preflight
    221ST MEETING OF THE AMERICAN ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY 6-10 January 2013 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA Scientific sessions will be held at the: Long Beach Convention Center 300 E. Ocean Blvd. COUNCIL.......................... 2 Long Beach, CA 90802 AAS Paper Sorters EXHIBITORS..................... 4 Aubra Anthony ATTENDEE Alan Boss SERVICES.......................... 9 Blaise Canzian Joanna Corby SCHEDULE.....................12 Rupert Croft Shantanu Desai SATURDAY.....................28 Rick Fienberg Bernhard Fleck SUNDAY..........................30 Erika Grundstrom Nimish P. Hathi MONDAY........................37 Ann Hornschemeier Suzanne H. Jacoby TUESDAY........................98 Bethany Johns Sebastien Lepine WEDNESDAY.............. 158 Katharina Lodders Kevin Marvel THURSDAY.................. 213 Karen Masters Bryan Miller AUTHOR INDEX ........ 245 Nancy Morrison Judit Ries Michael Rutkowski Allyn Smith Joe Tenn Session Numbering Key 100’s Monday 200’s Tuesday 300’s Wednesday 400’s Thursday Sessions are numbered in the Program Book by day and time. Changes after 27 November 2012 are included only in the online program materials. 1 AAS Officers & Councilors Officers Councilors President (2012-2014) (2009-2012) David J. Helfand Quest Univ. Canada Edward F. Guinan Villanova Univ. [email protected] [email protected] PAST President (2012-2013) Patricia Knezek NOAO/WIYN Observatory Debra Elmegreen Vassar College [email protected] [email protected] Robert Mathieu Univ. of Wisconsin Vice President (2009-2015) [email protected] Paula Szkody University of Washington [email protected] (2011-2014) Bruce Balick Univ. of Washington Vice-President (2010-2013) [email protected] Nicholas B. Suntzeff Texas A&M Univ. suntzeff@aas.org Eileen D. Friel Boston Univ. [email protected] Vice President (2011-2014) Edward B. Churchwell Univ. of Wisconsin Angela Speck Univ. of Missouri [email protected] [email protected] Treasurer (2011-2014) (2012-2015) Hervey (Peter) Stockman STScI Nancy S.
    [Show full text]
  • VEGA Science Review P
    The CHARA Science Meeting 2021 VEGA Science Review P. Berio, L. Bigot, D. Bonneau, M. Challouf, O. Chesneau, J.M. Clausse, O. Creevey, O. Delaa, A. Domiciano, N. Jamialahmadi, R. Ligi, F. Millour, A. Meilland, F. Morand, D. Mourard, N. Nardetto, K. Perraut, E. Saldanha, A. Salsi, A. Spang, P. Stee, I. Tallon-Bosc on behalf the VEGA team VEGA Science Review 1 The CHARA Science Meeting 2021 VEGA in a few important dates 2005 - May: 1st email exchanges - November: 1st visit on the Mountain 2006 Green light after the Tucson 2-year CHARA Science Meeting 2007 - August: 8 boxes weighting about 1200 kg sent to Mt Wilson - September, 30th: 1st 2T fringes (after 3 weeks of integration) 2008 - October: 3T fringes 2009 - Summer: First remote operation 2010 - May: simultaneous CLIMB and VEGA operation - Oct, 12th: 4T fringes together with MIRC 2012 Upgraded detectors and group delay tracking VEGA Science Review 2 The CHARA Science Meeting 2021 VEGA niches Limiting magnitude Rmag = 8 @ R ~ 5000 Very high angular resolution Spectral resolution (λ/2B ~ 0.4 mas @ 330 m) (R ~ 5000, 30000) Accurate angular diameters Kinematics and environments [Mourard+2015] ] [Ligi+2016 Circumstellar disks, mass-loss, winds, chromospheric activity, spectro-imaging Fundamental parameters, Surface-Brightness Relations, parameters of multiple and hierarchic systems VEGA Science Review 3 The CHARA Science Meeting 2021 VEGA operation in a few figures 47 refereed papers • 509 nights with recorded data • 770 stars VEGA Publications 10 • 8500 observations 8 6 4 2 During these
    [Show full text]