DOCSLIB.ORG

UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UCLA UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology Title Travel Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3945t7f7 Journal UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, 1(1) Author Köpp-Junk, Heidi Publication Date 2013-03-25 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California TRAVEL السفريات (الترحال) Heidi Köpp-Junk EDITORS WILLEKE WENDRICH Editor-in-Chief University of California, Los Angeles JACCO DIELEMAN Editor University of California, Los Angeles ELIZABETH FROOD Editor Area Editor Individual and Society University of Oxford JOHN BAINES Senior Editorial Consultant University of Oxford Short Citation: Köpp-Junk, 2013, Travel. UEE. Full Citation: Köpp-Junk, Heidi, 2013, Travel. In Elizabeth Frood and Willeke Wendrich (eds.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, Los Angeles. http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002gvznf 7992 Version 1, March 2013 http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002gvznf TRAVEL السفريات (الترحال) Heidi Köpp-Junk Reisen Voyager Travel was a crucial element of ancient Egyptian culture. An extensive traffic system by land and by water already existed as early as the Old Kingdom, including various means of transport that did not fundamentally change right through to the New Kingdom. Traveling activity attested for various professions demonstrates that Egyptian society exercised a high degree of mobility. In the majority of cases, a journey was undertaken within the scope of the traveler’s work and on behalf of the pharaoh. Travel had a significant impact on the Egyptian world-view as well as on the development of the identity of Egyptian society as an entity . السفريات ھي عنصر ھام في الحضارة المصرية القديمة، حيث وجد نظام مواصﻻت بري وبحري علي نطاق واسع منذ بدايات الدولة القديمة ، متضمنا َ وسائل متنوعة للنقل لم تتغير بشكل أساسي حتى عصر الدولة الحديثة. كان نشاط الترحال جزء من العديد من الوظائف ، مما يدل على أن المصريين القدماء كانوا يمارسوا درجة عالية من الترحال .و كان السفر في أغلب الحاﻻت جزء من وظائف اﻷفراد نيابة ً عن الفرعون. لذلك كان للسفر تأثير كبير على نظرة المصريين للعالم وأيضا ً على تطور ھوية المجتمع المصري. point of departure is important, for this he concept of travel in ancient Egypt distinguishes travel from emigration, where no T differed greatly from our modern return is intended (Köpp 2006: 1 - 2; see also Baines understanding of the term, which is 2007: 5 - 6). largely associated with tourism. Today, people frequently travel for touristic reasons—namely, their Sources need for rest and relaxation and their curiosity regarding foreign countries and peoples. However, Archaeological evidence, in addition to non-fictional this is a phenomenon that has developed only within and fictional texts, demonstrates how ancient the last 130 years (Bausinger 1991: 343 - 344). Up to Egyptians traveled. Depictions of Egyptian travelers the European Middle Ages and early modern era, are rare in Pharaonic Egypt. Occasionally Egyptian traveling mostly took place for economic reasons means of locomotion and transport appear in wall rather than for pleasure. The same applies to ancient paintings, and reliefs in tombs and temples. Some Egypt. From Pharaonic times there is little evidence sledges, chariots, and wagons, as well as one carrying of journeys for pleasure, or what we would interpret chair, have been recovered archaeologically (Köpp as “touristic” travel today (Köpp 2006: 309). Due to 2006: 131 - 132; 141 n. 938; 154 - 155; 201). this fact, travel in ancient Egypt must be defined in a Non-fiction sources referring to travels and broader sense: it is the movement of a person from travelers include biographies, expedition texts, of‐ A to B, where B lies outside his usual radius of ficial documents, and visitors’ graffiti. But travel is action. Other determining factors are absence from not the core motif in these texts; it is mentioned home and staying in other surroundings. only in passing. Therefore the information on travel Furthermore, the traveler’s intention to return to his Travel, Köpp-Junk, UEE 2013 1 is rather fragmentary. Typically an inscription will referred to in the expedition texts are not only high- mention only a journey’s starting point or ranking but from lower ranks as well (Seyfried 1981: destination, very seldom both. Harkhuf’s explicit 4). Hunters, fowlers, brewers, sandal makers, bakers, reference to his travel routes to the land of Yam— scribes, millers, servants (Seyfried 1981: 248 - 252; namely, the Oasis Road and the Elephantine Road Kemp 2007: 181), physicians, priests (Engelmann (Sethe: Urk. I: 124, 17-125, 11)—is an exception. and Hallof 1995: 113, 131), and mayors (HAtj-a) The means of transport or locomotion used on a (Seyfried 1981: 249) are mentioned in the texts. In voyage were scarcely mentioned. A rare exception the New Kingdom, professions connected with occurs in the biography of Weni, where reference is horses and chariots, such as charioteers, were made to the ships in which Weni traveled (Sethe: attested (Hikade 2001: 43). Urk. I: 99, 15; 107, 7-9). The motif of travel appears Expeditions differed in size and in the profession often in Egyptian literature, for example in The of their members, depending on the type of material Shipwrecked Sailor, Sinuhe, The Eloquent Peasant, The they were sent out to retrieve, or on the goods they Letter of Wermai, and Wenamun (Loprieno 2003; were going to trade. For example, quarrying Galán 2005; and particularly Moers 1999: 43-61; expeditions for precious stones and gems required a Moers 2001: 167 - 283). greater number of specialists, whereas expeditions for large, heavy blocks required a majority of lessor- The Ancient Egyptian Traveler skilled workers for the quarrying, and especially the A high degree of mobility is attested in ancient transport, of the stones (Verner 1991: 65 - 66). In Egypt from the earliest times (Köpp 2008a). the Old Kingdom, the number of expedition Expeditions are already attested in the Predynastic members lies between 80 und 20,000 (Eichler 1993: Period (Eichler 1993: 269). Visitors’ inscriptions 125, 155, 325). Senusret I sent to the Wadi from Dynasty 0 were found at the Gebel Tjauti Hammamat an expedition that included “18,660 (Darnell and Darnell 1997: 25). There is further skilled and unskilled workers” (Kemp 2007: 181). A evidence dating to King Hor Aha and mission under the reign of Ramesses III counted Khasekhemwy in Nubia, and for Djer at Gebel 3,000 members, including 2,000 common workers Sheikh Suleiman (Zibelius-Chen 1988: 144 - 145; and 500 masons (Hikade 2001: 49). An expedition Endesfelder 1991: 17 - 18). Expeditions are attested under Ramesses IV consisted of 408 members in up to the 30th Dynasty (Blumenthal 1977: 87). total (Hikade 2001: 38), among them 50 stone- Travelers, however, were not only members of carriers and 200 transport-carriers (Steinmann 1984: expeditions: they came from very different 31). Already from these few pieces of evidence it professions ranging across the whole of Egyptian becomes clear that expedition members came from society. Besides those professionals requiring a high various professions with a sizable number of degree of mobility, such as merchants, messengers, common workers among them. and members of the army, there is documentary A calculation of the figures given in the expedition evidence of many others, such as traveling texts reveals that there is evidence for approximately physicians, architects, scribes, craftsmen, workers, 23,400 members of expeditions in the Old and priests, who were frequently but not exclusively Kingdom, nearly 40,000 in the Middle Kingdom, on the move as members of expeditions. and 13,622 in the New Kingdom (Köpp 2006: 274, Two important categories of travelers were 277, 278, 313). The explanation as to why the members of expeditions and members of the army, number of expedition members in the New both consisting of a variety of occupational Kingdom is lower in comparison with that of the categories. Expeditions to Sinai could include Old and Middle Kingdoms lies in the fact that there “twenty-five different types of government officials, are fewer expedition-related inscriptions from the eleven types of specialized local mining officials, New Kingdom that survive (Zibelius-Chen 1988: eight types of artisans and nine types of laborers” 155) and they are less detailed than those from the (Shaw 1986: 200). The same range is evidenced at Middle Kingdom (Eichler 1993: 273). It is assumed the Wadi el-Hudi and the Wadi Hammamat in the nevertheless that the number of travelers increased Middle Kingdom (Shaw 1986: 200). The officials with the expansion of the Egyptian empire in the Travel, Köpp-Junk, UEE 2013 2 New Kingdom, since the expansion promoted a required. This could be sent within Egypt but higher degree of mobility within several professions, abroad as well. Such a widely traveled scribe was such as the military and the administration (Köpp Nebnetjeru, whose graffiti is found between 2006: 313 - 314). Kalabsha and Dendur, near Tonkalah, and possibly Č Not every expedition that took place is even at Toshka ( erný 1947: 57). documented; thus the total number of travelers who Craftsmen were also on the move. There is were on the move as members of expeditions is evidence of craftsmen in the service of private higher than the documented figures we possess. individuals and of pharaoh (Drenkhahn 1976: 134 - Furthermore, since the expedition texts frequently 157). They were not necessarily tied to a particular mention only the higher ranking members, while the workshop but were sent out on expeditions and lower grades are often not mentioned (Eichler 1993: large-scale royal building projects (Verner 1991: 77). 158 - 159, 181), the total figures may conceivably Even higher-ranking craftsmen with titles such as have been much higher. Hmw wr, jmj-rA kAt, and jmj-rA nbjw n pr Ra are The members of the army consisted of various among those whose project-related work orders professions—from scribes to generals and soldiers caused them to travel (e.g., Raue 1999: 72, n.
Recommended publications
  • Canaan Or Gaza?

    Canaan Or Gaza?

    Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections Pa-Canaan in the Egyptian New Kingdom: Canaan or Gaza? Michael G. Hasel Institute of Archaeology, Southern Adventist University A&564%'6 e identification of the geographical name “Canaan” continues to be widely debated in the scholarly literature. Cuneiform sources om Mari, Amarna, Ugarit, Aššur, and Hattusha have been discussed, as have Egyptian sources. Renewed excavations in North Sinai along the “Ways of Horus” have, along with recent scholarly reconstructions, refocused attention on the toponyms leading toward and culminating in the arrival to Canaan. is has led to two interpretations of the Egyptian name Pa-Canaan: it is either identified as the territory of Canaan or the city of Gaza. is article offers a renewed analysis of the terms Canaan, Pa-Canaan, and Canaanite in key documents of the New Kingdom, with limited attention to parallels of other geographical names, including Kharu, Retenu, and Djahy. It is suggested that the name Pa-Canaan in Egyptian New Kingdom sources consistently refers to the larger geographical territory occupied by the Egyptians in Asia. y the 1960s, a general consensus had emerged regarding of Canaan varied: that it was a territory in Asia, that its bound - the extent of the land of Canaan, its boundaries and aries were fluid, and that it also referred to Gaza itself. 11 He Bgeographical area. 1 The primary sources for the recon - concludes, “No wonder that Lemche’s review of the evidence struction of this area include: (1) the Mari letters, (2) the uncovered so many difficulties and finally led him to conclude Amarna letters, (3) Ugaritic texts, (4) texts from Aššur and that Canaan was a vague term.” 12 Hattusha, and (5) Egyptian texts and reliefs.
  • Ankh: Gods of Egypt Rulebook

    Ankh: Gods of Egypt Rulebook

    RULEBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW .................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 3 COMPONENTS .........................................................................4 BASIC CONCEPTS ................................................................... 7 Adjacency ...............................................................................8 Figures .....................................................................................8 Monuments ............................................................................8 Central Dashboard .............................................................9 God Dashboard .................................................................. 10 Devotion ..................................................................................11 Battle Cards ...........................................................................11 SETUP ..........................................................................................12 WINNING THE GAME ..........................................................13 GAMEPLAY ...............................................................................13 ACTIONS ....................................................................................14 OVERVIEW Move Figures ........................................................................15 Summon Figure ...................................................................16 Gain Followers .....................................................................17
  • Temples and Tombs Treasures of Egyptian Art from the British Museum

    Temples and Tombs Treasures of Egyptian Art from the British Museum

    Temples and Tombs Treasures of Egyptian Art from The British Museum Resource for Educators this is max size of image at 200 dpi; the sil is low res and for the comp only. if approved, needs to be redone carefully American Federation of Arts Temples and Tombs Treasures of Egyptian Art from The British Museum Resource for Educators American Federation of Arts © 2006 American Federation of Arts Temples and Tombs: Treasures of Egyptian Art from the British Museum is organized by the American Federation of Arts and The British Museum. All materials included in this resource may be reproduced for educational American Federation of Arts purposes. 212.988.7700 800.232.0270 The AFA is a nonprofit institution that organizes art exhibitions for presen- www.afaweb.org tation in museums around the world, publishes exhibition catalogues, and interim address: develops education programs. 122 East 42nd Street, Suite 1514 New York, NY 10168 after April 1, 2007: 305 East 47th Street New York, NY 10017 Please direct questions about this resource to: Suzanne Elder Burke Director of Education American Federation of Arts 212.988.7700 x26 [email protected] Exhibition Itinerary to Date Oklahoma City Museum of Art Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 7–November 26, 2006 The Cummer Museum of Art and Gardens Jacksonville, Florida December 22, 2006–March 18, 2007 North Carolina Museum of Art Raleigh, North Carolina April 15–July 8, 2007 Albuquerque Museum of Art and History Albuquerque, New Mexico November 16, 2007–February 10, 2008 Fresno Metropolitan Museum of Art, History and Science Fresno, California March 7–June 1, 2008 Design/Production: Susan E.
  • Was the Function of the Earliest Writing in Egypt Utilitarian Or Ceremonial? Does the Surviving Evidence Reflect the Reality?”

    Was the Function of the Earliest Writing in Egypt Utilitarian Or Ceremonial? Does the Surviving Evidence Reflect the Reality?”

    “Was the function of the earliest writing in Egypt utilitarian or ceremonial? Does the surviving evidence reflect the reality?” Article written by Marsia Sfakianou Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom..........................2 How writing began.........................................................................................................4 Scopes of early Egyptian writing...................................................................................6 Ceremonial or utilitarian? ..............................................................................................7 The surviving evidence of early Egyptian writing.........................................................9 Bibliography/ references..............................................................................................23 Links ............................................................................................................................23 Album of web illustrations...........................................................................................24 1 Map of Egypt. Late Predynastic Period-Early Dynastic (Grimal, 1994) Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom (from the appendix of Grimal’s book, 1994, p 389) 4500-3150 BC Predynastic period. 4500-4000 BC Badarian period 4000-3500 BC Naqada I (Amratian) 3500-3300 BC Naqada II (Gerzean A) 3300-3150 BC Naqada III (Gerzean B) 3150-2700 BC Thinite period 3150-2925 BC Dynasty 1 3150-2925 BC Narmer, Menes 3125-3100 BC Aha 3100-3055 BC
  • Three Conquests of Canaan

    Three Conquests of Canaan

    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
  • Practicing Medicine in Ancient Egypt

    Practicing Medicine in Ancient Egypt

    Practicing Medicine in Ancient Egypt Michael R. Zimmerman March 28, 2017 Michael Zimmerman is Adjunct Professor of Biology at Villanova University, Lecturer in Anthropology at the University of Pennsylvania, and Visiting Professor at the University of Manchester (UK) KNH Centre for Biomedical Egyptology. et us start by imagining what Albert Einstein called a “thought experiment.” It is the year 5015 CE L and an excavation of an ancient hospital, ca. 2016 CE, uncovers an ancient book, written on paper rather than on the current electronic device. Although the book is in poor condition there is a partial hieroglyphic title, transcribed by an Egyptologist and a paleopathologist as Merck Manual. The book seems to be a compilation of disease descriptions and treatments by a long forgotten Dr. Merck. The diseases are difficult to decipher in an era when humans live to the age of 150 and die only when aged organs fail. It appears that the body could be attacked by minute parasitic organisms, visible only with an ancient tool called a “microscope.” Some cells appear to have taken on a life of their own, destroying the body by causing diseases known by a variety of poorly preserved terms such as “cancer” or “neoplasm.” The task of our future paleopathologist is analogous to that of the difficult undertaking of deciphering ancient Egyptian medical papyri. There are a number of surviving papyri, in various degrees of completeness, which have been studied by physicians and Egyptologists. They have done remarkably well, particularly in that the writing is mostly in the difficult hieratic rather than hieroglyphic text.
  • Amarna Period Down to the Opening of Sety I's Reign

    Amarna Period Down to the Opening of Sety I's Reign

    oi.uchicago.edu STUDIES IN ANCIENT ORIENTAL CIVILIZATION * NO.42 THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Thomas A. Holland * Editor with the assistance of Thomas G. Urban oi.uchicago.edu oi.uchicago.edu Internet publication of this work was made possible with the generous support of Misty and Lewis Gruber THE ROAD TO KADESH A HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE BATTLE RELIEFS OF KING SETY I AT KARNAK SECOND EDITION REVISED WILLIAM J. MURNANE THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO STUDIES IN ANCIENT ORIENTAL CIVILIZATION . NO.42 CHICAGO * ILLINOIS oi.uchicago.edu Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 90-63725 ISBN: 0-918986-67-2 ISSN: 0081-7554 The Oriental Institute, Chicago © 1985, 1990 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Published 1990. Printed in the United States of America. oi.uchicago.edu TABLE OF CONTENTS List of M aps ................................ ................................. ................................. vi Preface to the Second Edition ................................................................................................. vii Preface to the First Edition ................................................................................................. ix List of Bibliographic Abbreviations ..................................... ....................... xi Chapter 1. Egypt's Relations with Hatti From the Amarna Period Down to the Opening of Sety I's Reign ...................................................................... ......................... 1 The Clash of Empires
  • Sphinx Sphinx

    Sphinx Sphinx

    SPHINX SPHINX History of a Monument CHRISTIANE ZIVIE-COCHE translated from the French by DAVID LORTON Cornell University Press Ithaca & London Original French edition, Sphinx! Le Pen la Terreur: Histoire d'une Statue, copyright © 1997 by Editions Noesis, Paris. All Rights Reserved. English translation copyright © 2002 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2002 by Cornell University Press Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Zivie-Coche, Christiane. Sphinx : history of a moument / Christiane Zivie-Coche ; translated from the French By David Lorton. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8014-3962-0 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Great Sphinx (Egypt)—History. I.Tide. DT62.S7 Z58 2002 932—dc2i 2002005494 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materi­ als include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further informa­ tion, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 987654321 TO YOU PIEDRA en la piedra, el hombre, donde estuvo? —Canto general, Pablo Neruda Contents Acknowledgments ix Translator's Note xi Chronology xiii Introduction I 1. Sphinx—Sphinxes 4 The Hybrid Nature of the Sphinx The Word Sphinx 2.
  • The Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt: Oppressors Or Great

    The Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt: Oppressors Or Great

    order • proposal • value • oppressive • revolution • stability SoGen Unit 6.1 social THE PHARAOHS OF studies ANCIENT EGYPT: OPPRESSORS OR GREAT LEADERS? SOCIAL STUDIES ACTIVITIES Session 1 2–3 Reader’s Theater Identifying Different Perspectives and Support Session 2 4–7 Building Background Knowledge Class Discussion Session 3 8–10 Understanding the Pharaohs Session 4 11–12 It’s Debate Time! Session 5 13–14 Writing SUPPLEMENTARY ACTIVITIES FOR OTHER CONTENT AREAS ELA 15 Twitter Revolutions Math 16 Mathematics with Knotted Ropes Science 17 Precautions in the Lab FOCUS WORDS Examining the Focus Words Closely 18 © 2015 SERP SoGen Unit 6.1 1 Session 1 order • proposal • value • oppressive • revolution • stability Reader’s Theater Comparing Parents to Pharaohs Setting: Tiana, Tray, and Ingrid are walking to school together. They stop to pick up their friend Raul. Since he hasn’t been answering their phone calls, Tiana knocks loudly on his door. After a minute, Raul storms out of his house. Raul: I swear! My parents are like…oppressors! Raul: I’m way ahead of you, Tiana. I did suggest going Tiana: What? somewhere more affordable, and my parents said, “No!” Honestly, I think they just want other parents to be Raul: My parents! They act like those people we’ve been impressed because they take their kids to Disney World. studying in social studies, the pharaohs in ancient Egypt. My aunt and uncle took their kids to the Grand Canyon They’re oppressive! last summer and they can’t stop talking about it. My Tiana: So you’re saying that your parents collect taxes parents are doing this just to look good, so they really from you and force you to build pyramids? Right.
  • Who's Who in Ancient Egypt

    Who's Who in Ancient Egypt

    Who’s Who IN ANCIENT EGYPT Available from Routledge worldwide: Who’s Who in Ancient Egypt Michael Rice Who’s Who in the Ancient Near East Gwendolyn Leick Who’s Who in Classical Mythology Michael Grant and John Hazel Who’s Who in World Politics Alan Palmer Who’s Who in Dickens Donald Hawes Who’s Who in Jewish History Joan Comay, new edition revised by Lavinia Cohn-Sherbok Who’s Who in Military History John Keegan and Andrew Wheatcroft Who’s Who in Nazi Germany Robert S.Wistrich Who’s Who in the New Testament Ronald Brownrigg Who’s Who in Non-Classical Mythology Egerton Sykes, new edition revised by Alan Kendall Who’s Who in the Old Testament Joan Comay Who’s Who in Russia since 1900 Martin McCauley Who’s Who in Shakespeare Peter Quennell and Hamish Johnson Who’s Who in World War Two Edited by John Keegan Who’s Who IN ANCIENT EGYPT Michael Rice 0 London and New York First published 1999 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004. © 1999 Michael Rice The right of Michael Rice to be identified as the Author of this Work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
  • Ancient Egypt: Symbols of the Pharaoh

    Ancient Egypt: Symbols of the Pharaoh

    Ancient Egypt: Symbols of the pharaoh Colossal bust of Ramesses II Thebes, Egypt 1250 BC Visit resource for teachers Key Stage 2 Ancient Egypt: Symbols of the pharaoh Contents Before your visit Background information Resources Gallery information Preliminary activities During your visit Gallery activities: introduction for teachers Gallery activities: briefings for adult helpers Gallery activity: Symbol detective Gallery activity: Sculpture study Gallery activity: Mighty Ramesses After your visit Follow-up activities Ancient Egypt: Symbols of the pharaoh Before your visit Ancient Egypt: Symbols of the pharaoh Before your visit Background information The ancient Egyptians used writing to communicate information about a person shown on a sculpture or relief. They called their writing ‘divine word’ because they believed that Thoth, god of wisdom, had taught them how to write. Our word hieroglyphs derives from a phrase meaning ‘sacred carvings’ used by the ancient Greek visitors to Egypt to describe the symbols that they saw on tomb and temple walls. The number of hieroglyphic signs gradually grew to over 7000 in total, though not all of them were used on a regular basis. The hieroglyphs were chosen from a wide variety of observed images, for example, people, birds, trees, or buildings. Some represent the sounds of the ancient Egyptian language, but consonants only. No vowels were written out. Also, it was not an alphabetic system, since one sign could represent a combination of two or more consonants like the gaming-board hieroglyph which stands for the consonants mn. Egyptologists make the sounds pronounceable by putting an e between the consonants, so mn is read as men.
  • University of Birmingham the Order of the Kushite Kings According To

    University of Birmingham the Order of the Kushite Kings According To

    University of Birmingham The Order of the Kushite Kings According to Sources from the Eastern Desert and Thebes Jurman, Claus DOI: 10.1163/18741665-12340037 License: Other (please specify with Rights Statement) Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Jurman, C 2017, 'The Order of the Kushite Kings According to Sources from the Eastern Desert and Thebes: Or: Shabataka was here first!', Journal of Egyptian History, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 124-151. https://doi.org/10.1163/18741665-12340037 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Article published in The Journal of Egyptian History, Vol 10, Issue 2, 2017 http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/18741665-12340037 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.