DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical and Financial Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical and Financial Proposal Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (on behalf of the Ministry of Spatial Planning and Environment – Montenegro) Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment for Detailed Spatial Plan for Hydro Power Projects (HPPs) on the Morača River Morača River Draft Final Report January 2010 Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (on behalf of the Ministry Spatial Planning and Environment – Montenegro) Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment for Detailed Spatial Plan for Hydro Power Projects (HPPs) on the Morača River Draft Final Report January 2010 Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment for Detailed Spatial Plan for HPPs on the Morača River i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS......................................................................................................IX 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - (NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY) ................................................................................... 1 1.1 Outline of the Plan ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Existing Environmental Status ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 Environmental factors ............................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Socio-Economic factors .............................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Risk, Environmental Characteristics and Problem Areas .................................................................................. 5 1.4 Environmental Protection Legislation ............................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Evaluation of impacts ........................................................................................................................................ 6 1.6 Mitigation measures .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1.7 Alternatives ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 1.8 Transboundary impacts ..................................................................................................................................... 9 1.9 Environmental Monitoring ............................................................................................................................... 9 1.10 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.10.1 Environmental Issues ............................................................................................................................... 9 1.10.2 Socio Economic Issues ............................................................................................................................ 11 1.11 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................ 12 1.11.1 General .................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.11.2 Environmental, geological and hydrological ......................................................................................... 12 1.11.3 Socio Economic ...................................................................................................................................... 13 PART 1 – ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND CONTEXT.......................................................................................14 2 OUTLINE OF DSP AND SEA ........................................................................................................................... 14 2.1 The Detailed Spatial Plan for HPPs on the Morača River ................................................................................ 14 2.1.1 Objectives of the DSP ............................................................................................................................... 16 2.1.2 DSP Relationship with other plans and programs ................................................................................... 17 2.1.3 Boundaries and Scope of the DSP ............................................................................................................ 18 2.1.4 Detailed Development Zones ................................................................................................................... 18 2.1.5 Review of the Proposed Hydropower Sites .............................................................................................. 18 2.1.6 Required Preparatory Works for the HPPs .............................................................................................. 22 2.1.7 Roads ....................................................................................................................................................... 22 2.1.8 Belgrade – Bar Railway ............................................................................................................................ 23 2.1.9 Wastewater and Sewerage ..................................................................................................................... 23 2.1.10 Power Houses and Power Lines from the HPPs ..................................................................................... 23 2.2 Upper Catchment Reservoirs .......................................................................................................................... 24 2.3 Background to the SEA .................................................................................................................................... 26 2.3.1 Terms of Reference and Objectives for the SEA ......................... 27 Report no. 7 2.3.2 Scope of Work and Rationale ..................................................... 27 Issue no. 9 2.4 The Project Area for the SEA .............................................................. 28 Date of issue January 2010 3 PROJECT CONTEXT .............................................................................. 30 Prepared DAH Checked RSS/INL/JHH/SEH/EVS/MOH/URS 3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 30 Approved BIL 3.2 Description of Project Area - Project Setting ..................................... 30 3.3 Environment .................................................................................................................................................... 30 3.3.1 Biodiversity .............................................................................................................................................. 30 Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment for Detailed Spatial Plan for HPPs on the Morača River ii 3.3.2 Land Use .................................................................................................................................................. 39 3.3.3 Soil ........................................................................................................................................................... 39 3.3.4 Geology .................................................................................................................................................... 40 3.3.5 Seismic Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 41 3.3.6 Natural Resources .................................................................................................................................... 43 3.3.7 Water Quality .......................................................................................................................................... 44 3.3.8 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................ 47 3.3.9 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................................ 61 3.3.10 Climatic Factors ..................................................................................................................................... 62 3.3.11 Climate Change ..................................................................................................................................... 63 3.3.12 Material Assets ...................................................................................................................................... 64 3.3.13 Cultural Heritage and Cultural Monuments .......................................................................................... 65 3.3.14 Landscape .............................................................................................................................................. 69 3.4 Socio-Economic ............................................................................................................................................... 71 3.4.1 Settlements and Population ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Factors of Migratory Movements of Population of Montenegro in Xix Century
    UDC: 314.728(497.16)”18” Историјски записи, година LXXXIV, 1-2/2011 Vukajlo GLUŠČEVIć* FACTORS OF MIGRATORY MOVEMENTS OF POPULATION OF MONTENEGRO IN XIX CENTURY ABSTRACT: The paper deals with conditions of migration movements from, within and in the Montenegro during the XIX century. Although more population left to settle in other countries, Serbia in the first place, Montenegro was also on the receptive side – providing home for emigrants – refugees – from other parts of the Balkan Peninsula fleeing from the Turkish terror. KEY wORDS: Montenegro, migrations of population, 19th century. The geographical position of Montenegro and influences of the oldest civilisations and cultures of Southern Europe had a crucial impact on early settlement of the territory of the present-day Montenegro as well as on the level of mobility of its population. The entire Montenegrin history is char- acterised to a high degree by migratory movements of various peoples from prehistory to the recent times. In this respect, particularly significant was the migration of the Slavs, whose migratory domination marked the end of the Roman and the beginning of the Slavic rule. After the Great Migration of peoples, broader-range migratory movements in the Balkans were recorded in the time of Turkish conquest of these area. Part of those migratory waves was the migration of Christian population (Serbs) from the areas of Koso- vo and Scutary (Shkoder). Fearing the Turkish reprisals, people fled towards Zeta and the Seaside. Started in the late 14th, this migratory process contin- ued through the 15th century. However, as of the late 15th century, migrations of the Montenegrin population also started so that in this respect Montenegro represents a tru- ly metanastatic (migratory) region from which, in all periods, more people would move out than in.
    [Show full text]
  • Na Osnovu Člana 13 Stav 2 Zakona O Biračkim Spiskovima (“Službeni List RCG”, Br
    Na osnovu člana 13 stav 2 Zakona o biračkim spiskovima (“Službeni list RCG”, br. 14/00 i 18/00) Državna izborna komisija O B J A V LJ U J E ukupan broj birača u Crnoj Gori, po jedinicama lokalne samouprave i po biračkim mjestima I Za izbore za Predsjednika Crne Gore koji će se održati 6. aprila 2008. godine, u Centralni birački spisak ukupno je upisano 490412 birača II U jedinicama lokalne samouprave i po biračkim mjestima ima ukupno birača, i to: ANDRIJEVICA Ukupan broj biračkih mjesta 23 Ukupan broj birača 4297 Broj Naziv biračkog mjesta Broj birača 1 Andrijevica, Peovac 694 2 Božiće 153 3 Bojoviće 94 4 Andželate - Sućeska 121 5 Seoce 212 6 Most Bandovića, Prisoja 278 7 Zabrdje 213 8 Slatina 286 9 Trešnjevo 386 10 Kralje 180 11 Oblo Brdo, Čuka 75 12 Sjenožeta 64 13 Gnjili Potok 101 14 Dulipolje 118 15 Košutiće 116 16 Jošanica 113 17 Djuliće 93 18 Cecune 52 19 Kuti 39 20 Ulotina, Gornje Luge 272 21 Gračanica 212 22 Trepča 173 23 Rijeka Marsenića, Navotina 252 BAR Ukupan broj biračkih mjesta 64 Ukupan broj birača 32884 1 DOM KULTURE "V.P.ŠPANAC" OD A - K 703 2 GIMNAZIJA "NIKO ROLOVIĆ" OD A - Z 794 3 GIMNAZIJA "NIKO ROLOVIĆ" OD P - Š 835 4 OŠ "BLAŽO JOKOV ORLANDIĆ" OD A - L 774 5 OŠ "JUGOSLAVIJA" OD A - DJ 725 6 MZ "BAR II" (A-Z) 876 7 MZ "BAR II" (N-Š) 916 8 "RUMIJATRANS" OD A - K 616 9 OŠ "MEKSIKO" OD A - G 632 10 OŠ "MEKSIKO" OD R - Š 748 11 MZ "BAR V" 686 12 OŠ ANTO DJEDOVIĆ (A-D) 925 13 OŠ ANTO DJEDOVIĆ (M-P) 927 14 OŠ "KEKEC" - SUTOMORE OD A - LJ 867 15 PRIBOJSKO ODMAR.-SUTOMORE 1023 16 OŠ "MIŠIĆI" 279 17 MZ "STARI BAR" OD A - K
    [Show full text]
  • Socio Economic Analysis of Northern Montenegrin Region
    SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO Podgorica, June 2008. FOUNDATION F OR THE DEVELOPMENT O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO (FORS) SOCIO -ECONOMIC ANLY S I S O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR : Veselin Šturanović STUDY REVIEWER S : Emil Kočan, Nebojsa Babovic, FORS Montenegro; Zoran Radic, CHF Montenegro IN S TITUTE F OR STRATEGIC STUDIE S AND PROGNO S E S ISSP’S AUTHOR S TEAM : mr Jadranka Kaluđerović mr Ana Krsmanović mr Gordana Radojević mr Ivana Vojinović Milica Daković Ivan Jovetic Milika Mirković Vojin Golubović Mirza Mulešković Marija Orlandić All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means wit- hout the prior written permission of FORS Montenegro. Published with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the CHF International, Community Revitalization through Democratic Action – Economy (CRDA-E) program. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for Interna- tional Development. For more information please contact FORS Montenegro by email at [email protected] or: FORS Montenegro, Berane FORS Montenegro, Podgorica Dušana Vujoševića Vaka Đurovića 84 84300, Berane, Montenegro 81000, Podgorica, Montenegro +382 51 235 977 +382 20 310 030 SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS: ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Z a K O N O Teritorijalnoj Organizaciji Crne Gore
    Na osnovu člana 82 stav 1 ta čka 2 i člana 91 stav 2 Ustava Crne Gore, Skupština Crne Gore 24. saziva, na drugoj śednici drugog redovnog (jesenjeg) zasijedanja u 2011. godini, dana 2. novembra 2011. godine, donijela je Z A K O N O TERITORIJALNOJ ORGANIZACIJI CRNE GORE I. OSNOVNE ODREDBE Član 1 Ovim zakonom ure đuju se teritorijalna organizacija Crne Gore, uslovi, na čin i postupak teritorijalnog organizovanja i druga pitanja od značaja za teritorijalnu organizaciju. Član 2 Teritorija opštine, Glavnog grada i Prijestonice (u daljem tekstu: jedinice lokalne samouprave) utvr đuje se ovim zakonom. Član 3 Teritorija jedinice lokalne samouprave i naziv opštine mogu se mijenjati u skladu sa ovim zakonom. II. TERITORIJALNA ORGANIZACIJA Član 4 Teritoriju jedinice lokalne samouprave čine naselja. Član 5 Teritorija Glavnog grada Podgorica, sa sjedištem u Podgorici, obuhvata Podgoricu kao naselje gradskog karaktera, naselja: Balo či, Begova Glavica, Bezjovo, Beri, Bigor, Bio če, Blizna, Bolesestra, Brežine, Bri đe, Brskut, Buronje, Crnci, Crvena Paprat, Cvilin, Ćafa, Ćepeti ći, Dajbabe, Dolovi, Doljani, Donja Gorica, Donje Strav če, Donji Kokoti, Draževina, Du čići, Duga, Đurkovi ći, Duške, Farmaci, Fundina, Goljemadi, Gornje Stravče, Gornji Kokoti, Gradac, Grbavci, Grbi Do, Kisjelica, Klopot, Kopilje, Kornet, Kosor, Krusi, Kržanja, Leki ći, Liješnje, Liješta, Lijeva Rijeka, Lopote, Lutovo, Lužnica, Medun, Milati, Mom če, Mrke, Opasanica, Orahovo, Oraovice, Orasi, Ožezi, Parci, Pelev Brijeg, Petrovi ći, Poprat, Prisoja, Progonovi ći, Ra ći, Rade
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Tourist Facilities and Capacities in Lake Skadar-Shkodra Area
    Inventory of tourist facilities and capacities in Lake Skadar-Shkodra area INVENTORY OF TOURIST FACILITIES AND CAPACITIES IN LAKE SKADAR-SHKODRA AREA Prepared by LAKE SKADAR-SHKODRA INTEGRATED ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT July 2011 1 Inventory of tourist facilities and capacities in Lake Skadar-Shkodra area INTRODUCTION Lake Skadar-Shkodra is the largest lake in the Balkan Peninsula shared between Montenegro and Albania. The Montenegrin part of the lake and its surrounding area were declared a national park in 1983 and in Albania a Managed Nature Reserve. In 1996 in Montenegro and in 2006 in Albania, Skadar-Shkodra Lake was included in the Ramsar list of wetlands of international importance. Lake Skadar is a wonderful place with mirrored waters, rocky shores and wetlands full of wildlife with more than 270 species of birds, plenty of natural herbs, traditional fishing villages, numerous islet monasteries and cultural heritage sites, fascinating beaches surrounded by karst mountains, various amusing, social and cultutral events. Lake Skadar area is where some of the best wines and organic food in Montenegro can be found, cultivated by the local producers especially in Crmnica and Godinje valleys in Montenegro and Shtoj village in Albania. There are also numerous accomodation facilities, restaurants and shopping centers, on the Montenegrin and Labanian sides of the lake that make this area attractive to hiome and foreign tourists. Being a tourist attraction with all these natural and cultural resources the aim of this inventory is to prepare a joint Montenegrin and Albanian inventory on tourist facilities and capacities of Lake Shkodra area, to promote Lake Skadar-Shkodra as a joint tourist attraction internally and internationally.
    [Show full text]
  • Ribnica Je Še Vedno V Vrhu So Poleg Drugih Članov Doslej Opravili • Naj Se Ve, Kdo Pije Tudi Veliko Prostovoljnega Dela
    St. 13 (2016) Leto XXXIX NOVO MESTO četrtek, 31. marca 1988 Cena: 500 din 13. februarja 1975 je bil list odlikovan z redom ZASLUGE ZA NAROD S SREBRNIMI ŽARKI imaga Ribnica med Spominski v razvoju Dolenjska mlekarna odložena? gospodarsko Vlaganje v Ljubljani prvenstvena naloga — Mercator: gradili bomo na Dolenj­ vodnik nared {kihe krajine _____________________________________skem — Mlekarna bi ohranila živinorejoživinorejo — Ekonomika! najuspešnejšimi S petkovega srečanja NOVO MESTO — Težko bo zbrati denar za neodložljive naložbe v Ljubl­ valnica mleka v regiji bi bila namreč ga­ Industrijska proizvodnja kmetov in strokovnjakov janski mlekarni v Ljubljani in sredstva, voljo ter z ekonomskimi pokazatelji rancija za ohranitev in razvoj kmetijst­ § seje 10 skupnosti lani za četrtino večja podprte argumente za gradnjo dolenjske mlekarne. Več pravzaprav nedavna va. Če pa to sedaj stagnira, je krivda tu­ Zumberak-Gorjanci — v Dobrniču______ razprava, na kateri so sodelovali prestavniki dolenjskih in posavskih občin in di v kmetijski politiki, s katero je družba RIBNICA — Ribniško gospodarst­ medobčinskih gospodarskih zbornic, republiškega komiteja za kmetijstvo, močno zavrla pridelavo mleka. Jasno NOVO MESTO — 28. marca se vo je v primerjavi z regijskim in repu­ DOBRNIČ — »Študija sama po sebi gozdarstvo in prehrano, predsednik Zadružne zveze Slovenije Leo Frelih in ničesar ne prinese. Treba je drugače je tu sestal izvršni odbor skupščine bliškim zaključilo minulo poslovno leto predstavniki ljubljanskega Mercatorja, ni prinesla. razmišljati, če naj bi v nekaj letih za­ * Na seji so ocenili, da sta glede pre­ ' upnosti spominskega območja zelo uspešno. Obseg industrijske proiz­ Po eni strani je Mercatoijevo vodst­ bi s tem dokončno odložili gradnjo na sukali namero, da bi izšolane ljudi za­ delovalnic mleka Dolenjska in Posav­ umberak-Goijanci.
    [Show full text]
  • Montenegro Guidebook
    MONTENEGRO PREFACE Podgorica, the capital of Montenegro, lies in a broad plain crossed by five rivers and surrounded by mountains, just 20 kilometers from the Albanian border. The city has a population of around 180,000 people. Bombed into rubble during World War II, Podgorica was rebuilt into a modern urban center, with high-rise apartment buildings and new office and shopping developments. While the latest Balkan war had a low impact on the physical structures, the economic sanctions had a devastating effect on employment and infrastructure. With the help of foreign investment, urban renewal is evident throughout the city, but much of it may still appear run down. Podgorica has a European-style town center with a pedestrian- only walking street (mall) and an assortment of restaurants, cafes, and boutiques. To many, its principal attraction is as a base for the exploration of Montenegro’s natural beauty, with mountains and wild countryside all around and the stunning Adriatic coastline less than an hour away. This is a mountainous region with barren moorlands and virgin forests, with fast-flowing rivers and picturesque lakes; Skadar Lake in particular is of ecological significance. The coastline is known for its sandy beaches and dramatic coves: for example, Kotor – the city that is protected by UNESCO and the wonderful Cathedral of Saint Typhoon; the unique baroque Perast; Saint George and Our Lady of the Rock islands – all locations that tell a story of a lasting civilization and the wealth of the most wonderful bay in the world. The area around the city of Kotor is a UNESCO World Heritage site for its natural beauty and historic significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Spisak Do Sada Izvedenih Objekata
    SPISAK DO SADA IZVEDENIH OBJEKATA Godina Vrijednost Red. Br Naziv objekta i mjesto gradnje Investitior izgradnje izvedenih radova Stambeno poslovni-objekat Ljubović 1 "Cijevna Komerc" 1998-1999 € 2,148,000.00 "618 a,b,c,d " Površine 3500m2 Objekat: "Poslovna zgrada" 2 "Vektra Annotech" 2000/2001 € 186,600.00 Podgorica Objekat: "Hala", površine 1500m2, 3 "Vektra Annotech" 2000/2001 € 307,000.00 Podgorica Stambeno poslovni-objekat Ljubović 4 "Cijevna Komerc" 2000/2001 € 2,863,000.00 "622 " Površine 3500m2, Podgorica Objekat: Plato za kontenjere, 5 "Vektra Annotech" 2000 € 83,341.00 površina 1000m2, Podgorica Objekat: "Sportsak hala-Zeta" 6 Opština Podgorica 2001 € 406,275.00 Podgorica Stambeno- poslovni objekat Zagorič Opština Podgorica I 7 “369”, “370”, “370A”, površina 2000/2002 € 7,546,509.00 "Cijevna Komerc" 23000 m2, Podgorica Hotel Premier, površina 12000m2, 8 "Cijevna Komerc" 2000/2002 € 9,000,000.00 Podgorica Geađevinski radovi na objektima 9 Separacija Morača i betonjerke, "Cijevna Komerc" 2001/2002 € 327,973.00 Podgorica Objekat: Osnovna škola "Milan 10 Opština Podgorica 2002 € 187,108.00 Vukotić", Golubovci, Podgorica Objekat: Spomenik Valtazaru 11 Bogišiću-ispred pravnog fakulteta, Opština Podgorica 2002 € 22,265.00 Podgorica Radovi na KBC-u, Krusevac, Ministarstvo zdravlja 12 2002/2003 € 275,769.00 Podgorica Crne Gore Pješačka staza kod Velike pjace, 13 IRD 2002 € 26,200.00 Podgorica 14 Objekat "III/1", Kruševac, Podgorica "Fin Invest" 2002/2004 € 3,200,890.85 15 Radovi na KAP-u, Podgorica KAP 2003/2004 € 91,000.00 Objekat: "Trgovinsko poslovni 16 objekti"- Cijevna, Golubovci, "FAB-Live" 2003/2004 € 511,000.00 Podgorica 17 objekat: Hotel "Rivijera", Petrovac "Eurotours" Budva 2003/2004 € 491,000.00 18 Objekat: Dom Kulture, Golubovci Opština Podgorica 2004 € 186,000.00 Plantaže-izgradnja novog vino 19 A.D Plantaže 2004 € 112,706.10 podrum.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Approval of the Budget in Water Supply System
    DEVELOPMENT AND APPROVAL OF THE BUDGET IN WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Authors: Božo Đikanović /Finance Director/d.o.o “Vodovod i kanalizacija” Podgorica, Podgorica, /Montenegro Jadranka Pavićević /Head of Center for Quality/DOO “Vodovod i kanalizacija – Cetinje”, Cetinje /Montenegro Marjana Kaluđerović /Head of Sector of Ecology and integrated management systems/Kombinat aluminijuma Podgorica, Podgorica/Montenegro B.ĐIKANOVIĆ, J.PAVIĆEVIĆ AND M.KALUĐEROVIĆ - DEVELOPMENT AND APPROVAL OF THE BUDGET IN WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INTRODUCTION | Water is precious natural resorce. The Goverment has formulated Strategy sustainable rearsch for ensuring suinstable use of water resources. Our company is to support the municipality in meeting these goals with functions continuous water supply for citizens with good water quality. In order to achieve the set goals of principles of sustainability of the water supply and public health protection it must be achieved all the specific goals in specific processes. | It is necessary for the planned activities at the level of all processes make a plan of action and assessment of fixed costs and investments. For achieve economy and efficiency of operations will be used resistance da ta from other water systems. Prepara tion of the operating bu dge t and capital budget are a major segment of the financial activity, and is of great significance monitoring challenges arising in the EU accession process. It should also be noted first of all given to training for the accumula tion of know le dge and skills to achieve the set tar ge t. | The implementation Scada applications support the management of production and distribution of water, and water quality monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank Report No: 40088 Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT BRIEF ON A Public Disclosure Authorized PROPOSED GRANT FROM THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY TRUST FUND IN THE AMOUNT OF US$ 4.55 MILLION TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ALBANIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF MONTENEGRO FOR A Public Disclosure Authorized LAKE SKADAR-SHKODER INTEGRATED ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PROJECT May 8, 2007 Sustainable Development Unit Public Disclosure Authorized Europe and Central Asia Region (ECSSD) CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective {Date}) Currency Unit = Serbian Dinar (CSD) 70.33 CSD = USD 1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS BLMC Bilateral Lake Management Committee (Albania and Montenegro) CAS Country Assistance Strategy CETI Center for Ecotoxicological Research (Montenegro) EAR European Agency for Reconstruction EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EPA Environmental Protection Agency (Montenegro) EU European Union FAO Food and Agriculture Organization (United Nations) GEF Global Environment Facility GoA Government of Republic of Albania GoM Government of Republic of Montenegro GTZ Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (Germany) IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development IDA International Development Association IUCN World Conservation Union KAP Kombinat Aluminijuma Podgorica KFW Kredit fur Wiederaufbau (Germany) MEFWA Ministry of Environment, Forests and Water Administration (Albania) MESTAP Montenegro Environmentally Sensitive Tourism Areas Project (World Bank) MTEP Ministry of Tourism and Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Odluka O Opštinskim I Nekategorisanim Putevima Na Teritoriji Glavnog Grada - Podgorice
    Odluka o opštinskim i nekategorisanim putevima na teritoriji Glavnog grada - Podgorice Odluka je objavljena u "Službenom listu CG - Opštinski propisi", br. 11/2009, 40/2015 i 34/2016. I OPŠTE ODREDBE Član 1 Ovom Odlukom se uređuje upravljanje, izgradnja, rekonstrukcija, održavanje, zaštita, razvoj i način korišćenja i finansiranja opštinskih i nekategorisanih puteva na teritoriji Glavnog grada - Podgorice (u daljem tekstu: Glavni grad). Član 2 Opštinski put je javni put namijenjen povezivanju naselja na teritoriji Glavnog grada, povezivanju sa naseljima u susjednim opštinama ili povezivanju djelova naselja, prirodnih i kulturnih znamenitosti, pojedinih objekata i slično na teritoriji Glavnog grada. Opštinski putevi su lokalni putevi, kao i ulice u naseljima. Opštinski putevi su putevi u opštoj upotrebi. Član 3 Nekategorisani put je površina koja se koristi za saobraćaj po bilo kom osnovu i koji je dostupan većem broju korisnika (seoski, poljski i šumski putevi, putevi na nasipima za odbranu od poplava, parkirališta i sl.). Nekategorisani putevi su u opštoj upotrebi, osim puteva koji su osnovno sredstvo privrednog društva ili drugog pravnog lica i puteva izgrađenih sredstvima građana na zemljištu u svojini građana. II ODREĐIVANjE OPŠTINSKIH I NEKATEGORISANIH PUTEVA Član 4 Prema značaju za saobraćaj i funkciji povezivanja u prostoru putevi na teritoriji Glavnog grada su kategorisani u: - opštinske puteve - lokalne puteve i ulice u naseljima i - nekategorisane puteve. Kategorizacija i način obilježavanja opštinskih puteva vrši se na osnovu mjerila za kategorizaciju koje utvrđuje Skupština Glavnog grada, posebnom odlukom. Kategorija planiranog opštinskog puta na osnovu mjerila iz prethodnog stava i propisa o uređenju prostora, određuje se planskim dokumentom Glavnog grada. Član 5 Odluku o određivanju i prekategorizaciji opštinskih i nekategorisanih puteva na teritoriji Glavnog grada donosi Skupština, shodno odluci iz člana 4 stav 2 ove odluke.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multiscalar Research Project, Following an Ancient Decumanus in Montenegro
    2020 IMEKO TC-4 International Conference on Metrology for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Trento, Italy, October 22-24, 2020 A multiscalar research project, following an ancient decumanus in Montenegro Lucia Alberti1, Francesca Colosi2, Pasquale Merola 3 1 Institute of Heritage Sciences, National Research Council of Italy – Area della Ricerca Roma 1, Via Salaria km 29,300 CP 10 – 00015 Monterotondo St., ITALY, [email protected] 2 Institute of Heritage Sciences, National Research Council of Italy – Area della Ricerca Roma 1, Via Salaria km 29,300 CP 10 – 00015 Monterotondo St., ITALY, [email protected] 3 Institute of Heritage Sciences, National Research Council of Italy – University Campus of Lecce, via per Monteroni, Lecce, ITALY, [email protected] Abstract – A multidisciplinary project is being carried knowledge of the site and then to fashion and carry through out by an Italian-Montenegrin team in the Roman town an improved design for a sustainable plan on its relaunch. of Doclea in Montenegro. Applying a multi- and After establishing a diachronic reconstruction of Doclea interdisciplinary approach and multiscalar analysis to and the cultural landscape of its valley from the Bronze the site and its surrounding territory, it has been Age to the medieval period, our ultimate goal is to make possible to identify traces of the decumanus maximus, the territory more visible, making it more attractive for the not only in the public centre of the city, where the main application of new technologies. Through these last the road was partially already excavated, but also outside knowledge gained can be circulated, the populace the walls of the town, even into the suburbs of the revitalized and cultural tourism encouraged.
    [Show full text]