DOCSLIB.ORG

Marko Leino Process Simulation Unit Operation Models – Review of Open

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marko Leino Process Simulation Unit Operation Models – Review of Open MARKO LEINO PROCESS SIMULATION UNIT OPERATION MODELS – REVIEW OF OPEN AND HSC CHEMISTRY I/O INTERFACES Master of Science Thesis Examiner: Professor Hannu Jaakkola Examiner and topic approved by the Faculty Council of the Faculty of Business and Built Environment on 6 April 2016 i ABSTRACT MARKO LEINO: Process Simulation Unit Operation Models – Review of Open and HSC Chemistry I/O Interfaces Tampere University of Technology Master of Science Thesis, 76 pages, 29 Appendix pages April 2016 Master’s Degree Programme in Information Technology Major: Software Engineering Examiner: Professor Hannu Jaakkola Keywords: CAPE-OPEN, HSC Chemistry Sim, unit operation, process simulation Chemical process modelling and simulation can be used as a design tool in the development of chemical plants, and is utilized as a means to evaluate different design options. The CAPE- OPEN interface standards were developed to allow the deployment and utilization of process modelling components in any compliant process modelling environment. This thesis examines the possibilities provided by the CAPE-OPEN interfaces and the .NET framework to develop compliant, cross-platform process modelling components, particularly unit operations. From the software engineering point of view, a unit operation is a represen- tation of physical equipment, and contains the mathematical model of its functionality. The study indicates that the differences between the CAPE-OPEN standards and Outotec HSC Chemistry Sim are negligible at the conceptual level. On the other hand, at the implementa- tion level, the differences are quite considerable. Regardless of the simulation application be- ing used, the modelling of unit operations requires interdisciplinary skills, and creating tools and methods to ease the development of such models is well justified. The results of this study suggest that CAPE-OPEN both provides various paths to change the way HSC Chemistry Sim works and offers the HSC development team a chance to determine an alternative way to distribute tasks between simulation components. In addition, making HSC Chemistry Sim compliant would bring benefits, such as an extended process modelling component library, and perhaps more publicity. Obviously, the workload required by the changes depends on the chosen path, which invariably entails a lengthy learning curve. This thesis contributes by helping to make that learning curve shorter. ii TIIVISTELMÄ MARKO LEINO: Process Simulation Unit Operation Models – Review of Open and HSC Chemistry I/O Interfaces Tampereen teknillinen yliopisto Diplomityö, 76 sivua, 29 liitesivua Huhtikuu 2016 Tietotekniikan diplomi-insinöörin tutkinto-ohjelma Pääaine: Ohjelmistotuotanto Tarkastaja: professori Hannu Jaakkola Avainsanat: CAPE-OPEN, HSC Chemistry Sim, yksikköoperaatio, prosessien simulointi Kemiallisten prosessien mallinnusta ja simulointia käytetään kemiallisten tuotantolaitosten suunnittelussa työvälineinä ja niiden avulla voidaan arvioida eri suunnitteluvaihtoehtojen mielekkyyttä. CAPE-OPEN rajapintastandardit on kehitetty mahdollistamaan mallinnuskom- ponenttien käyttöönotto ja hyödyntäminen missä tahansa yhteensopivassa, standardia nou- dattavassa, prosessinmallinnusohjelmistossa. Tässä työssä tutkittiin CAPE-OPEN rajapintojen ja .NET -sovelluskehyksen tarjoamia mahdol- lisuuksia simulointiohjelmistosta riippumattomien, standardia noudattavien, prosessinmallin- nuskomponenttien, erityisesti yksikköoperaatioiden kehittämiseen. Ohjelmistoteknisesti yk- sikköoperaatio on fyysisen prosessilaitteen kuvaus, joka pitää sisällään kyseisen laitteen toi- minnan matemaattisen mallin. Osoitetuksi tulee, että erot CAPE-OPEN rajapintastandardien ja Outotec HSC Chemistry Sim -simulointisovelluksen välillä ovat käsitteellisellä tasolla pieniä. Toisaalta, toteutustasolla erot ovat suuria. Riippumatta käytettävästä simulointiohjelmistosta yksikköoperaatioiden mallien kehittäminen vaatii lähtökohtaisesti poikkitieteellistä osaamista, ja onkin perustelua kehittää apuvälineitä, joilla yksikköoperaation mallien luominen olisi mahdollisimman vaivatonta. Työn tulosten perusteella voidaan sanoa, että CAPE-OPEN tarjoaa sekä vaihtoehtoja muuttaa nykyistä HSC Chemistry Simin toimintamallia että kehittäjille mahdollisuuden hahmottaa simulaattorin osien välinen vastuunjako uudessa valossa. Lisäksi, HSC Chemistry Simin muut- taminen yhteensopivaksi standardin kanssa toisi mukanaan etuja, kuten laajennetun kompo- nenttivalikoiman ja mahdollisesti enemmän julkisuutta. Muutoksiin liittyvä työmäärä riippuu valitusta kehityssuunnasta, mutta joka tapauksessa niihin liittyy kestoltaan huomattavan pit- kä perehtymisvaihe, jota tämä työ osaltaan auttaa lyhentämään. iii PREFACE This thesis was commissioned by Outotec Finland plc as part of the continuous development work on the Outotec HSC Chemistry software suite. The research was conducted at Outotec Research Center in Pori and at Tampere University of Technology Pori Campus. During the course of the work I received ample help and support and I would like to express my gratitude for that. Firstly, I would like to thank my instructor Antti Roine, D.Sc. (Tech.), for making it possible for this work to become reality in the first place, for all his help, and for giving me enough leeway to write the content of this study in the way I had envisioned. I would like to thank Professor Hannu Jaakkola for supervising my thesis work. His profes- sional approach to supervising the work is greatly appreciated. This particular thesis will go down in history as the 302nd thesis he has supervised. On a related note, the other members of the Tampere University of Technology Pori Campus staff are acknowledged for their excel- lent work and for providing a good learning experience in an open, friendly atmosphere. In addition, I wish to extend my thanks to the members of the HSC Chemistry development team for their help. Mika Saari, M.Sc. (Tech.), who helped me with software development tools and virtual machines, and Michael Jones, BA (Hons) and Sue Pearson, BA (Hons), from Pelc Southbank Languages, who proofread the thesis, are acknowledged for their help. Last but not least, I would like to thank my family and friends for their support. Very special thanks go to my wife Rosana and our children Patrick and Daniela for everything. Pori, Finland, 6 May 2016 Marko Leino iv CONTENTS 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Technology review .................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 An overview of chemical process simulation ........................................................................ 2 2.2 Frame of reference ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.2.1 Interoperability and CAPE-OPEN ............................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Contextual definition of interface ............................................................................... 7 2.2.3 HSC Chemistry Sim ........................................................................................................ 8 2.3 CAPE-OPEN compliant process simulation environment .................................................. 9 2.3.1 Program architecture ..................................................................................................... 9 2.3.2 Documentation ..............................................................................................................16 2.3.3 Requirements for unit operations .............................................................................20 2.3.4 Creation of unit operation classes ............................................................................26 2.3.5 Additional information ................................................................................................31 2.3.6 Extensions, add-ins and prototyping .......................................................................35 2.4 Availability of compliant products .........................................................................................46 2.4.1 COCO and DWSIM .......................................................................................................46 2.4.2 Commercial process simulators.................................................................................50 3 Design in HSC Chemistry Sim ...........................................................................................................51 3.1 Requirements................................................................................................................................51 3.1.1 Sim unit operations ......................................................................................................52 3.1.2 Implementation schema ..............................................................................................54 3.2 Development and deployment .................................................................................................57 3.2.1 Visual Studio Integrated Development Environment ..........................................57 3.2.2 Object-oriented Visual Basic and the .NET framework ......................................58 3.2.3 Dynamic-link libraries .................................................................................................60 4 Results and discussion
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1. Define: Unit Operation. Useful Physical Changes Occur in the Chemical Industry Is Known As a Unit Operation
    INTREVIEW QUESTIONS 1. Define: Unit operation. Useful Physical changes occur in the chemical industry is known as a Unit Operation. Example: Distillation, Filtration, Drying, Extraction, Gas absorption, Crystallization, etc. 2. Define: Unit process. Useful Chemical changes with or without physical change occur in chemical industry are known as a Unit Process. Example: - Oxidation, Reduction, Alkylation, Sulfonation, Chlorination, etc. 3. Define: Boiling Point and Bubble Point. Boiling Point: -It is a temperature of a liquid at which the vapour pressure of the liquid is equal to atmospheric pressure. Bubble Point: -It is a temperature at which first bubble of vapour is formed. 4. When does liquid boil? When the vapour pressure of the liquid is equal to atmospheric pressure at that time liquid is boil. 5. Define: - Volatile Liquid. It is a tendency of a liquid to vaporize. 6. Acetone and water out of this which is more volatile and why? Acetone is more volatile than water because of boiling point of acetone (56.7 °C) is low compa re to boiling point of water (100° C) 7. What is the Relative Volatility? It is a ratio of concentration of more volatile component in vapour phase to liquid phase is called Relative Volatility 8. What is important of Relative Volatility? For separation of liquid mixture using distillation, Relative volatility should be more than 1. 9. Why is Reflux done in distillation column? and Define Reflux Ratio. For Increasing product purity. Reflux: -It is amount of distillate which is resend to distillation column is known as a reflux. Reflux Ratio: -Reflux ratio is the ratio of the portion of the overhead liquid product from a distillation column that is returned to the upper part of column to the portion of liquid collected as distillate.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule for FDP on Free Open Source Tools for Education and Research Timing Activity About the Activity Webpage Link Opening Talk by Prof
    Schedule for FDP on Free Open Source Tools For Education and Research Timing Activity About the activity Webpage Link Opening talk by Prof. D. K. Singh (Director BIT Sindri), 10:00AM - 10:30 AM Inaguration Introdcution of Expert speaker by Coordinator A Spoken Tutorial is a screencast with running 10:30 AM - 11:00 AM Overview of Spoken Tutorials commentary, a recording of computer session created for https://spoken-tutorial.org/ self learning. FOSSEE (Free/Libre and Open Source Software for Education) project promotes the use of FLOSS tools to improve the quality of education in our country. We aim to reduce dependency on proprietary software in 11:00 PM - 11:30 AM Overview of FOSSEE educational institutions. https://fossee.in/ The FOSSEE project is part of the National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), Government of India. Scilab software, free/libre and open source reference in numerical computation software. Scilab is used in all 11:30 AM - 12:00 PM Scilab and related activities major strategic scientific areas of industry and services https://scilab.in/ such as space, aeronautics, automotive, energy, defense, finance and transport. OpenModelica is a free/libre and open-source environment based on the Modelica modeling language 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM OpenModelica and related activities https://om.fossee.in/ for modeling, simulating, optimizing, and analyzing complex dynamic systems. LUNCH BREAK DWSIM is a multiplatform, CAPE-OPEN compliant chemical process simulator for Windows, Linux, Android, 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM DWSIM and related activities macOS, and iOS.
    [Show full text]
  • MATERIAL BALANCE NOTES Revision 3 Irven Rinard Department
    MATERIAL BALANCE NOTES Revision 3 Irven Rinard Department of Chemical Engineering City College of CUNY and Project ECSEL October 1999 © 1999 Irven Rinard CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 A. Types of Material Balance Problems B. Historical Perspective I. CONSERVATION OF MASS 5 A. Control Volumes B. Holdup or Inventory C. Material Balance Basis D. Material Balances II. PROCESSES 13 A. The Concept of a Process B. Basic Processing Functions C. Unit Operations D. Modes of Process Operations III. PROCESS MATERIAL BALANCES 21 A. The Stream Summary B. Equipment Characterization IV. STEADY-STATE PROCESS MODELING 29 A. Linear Input-Output Models B. Rigorous Models V. STEADY-STATE MATERIAL BALANCE CALCULATIONS 33 A. Sequential Modular B. Simultaneous C. Design Specifications D. Optimization E. Ad Hoc Methods VI. RECYCLE STREAMS AND TEAR SETS 37 A. The Node Incidence Matrix B. Enumeration of Tear Sets VII. SOLUTION OF LINEAR MATERIAL BALANCE MODELS 45 A. Use of Linear Equation Solvers B. Reduction to the Tear Set Variables C. Design Specifications i VIII. SEQUENTIAL MODULAR SOLUTION OF NONLINEAR 53 MATERIAL BALANCE MODELS A. Convergence by Direct Iteration B. Convergence Acceleration C. The Method of Wegstein IX. MIXING AND BLENDING PROBLEMS 61 A. Mixing B. Blending X. PLANT DATA ANALYSIS AND RECONCILIATION 67 A. Plant Data B. Data Reconciliation XI. THE ELEMENTS OF DYNAMIC PROCESS MODELING 75 A. Conservation of Mass for Dynamic Systems B. Surge and Mixing Tanks C. Gas Holders XII. PROCESS SIMULATORS 87 A. Steady State B. Dynamic BILIOGRAPHY 89 APPENDICES A. Reaction Stoichiometry 91 B. Evaluation of Equipment Model Parameters 93 C. Complex Equipment Models 96 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Operations for Bioprocess Engineers
    Unit Operations for Bioprocess Engineers Chenming (Mike) Zhang Department of Biological Systems Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, VA 24061 Abstract Unit Operations in Biological Systems Engineering was introduced into the curriculum at Virginia Tech in 2000. It is a lecture and laboratory combined course. The lectures and experiments covered in the course had a narrow focus before the author took over in 2002. To broaden the education for students selecting the Bioprocess Engineering option within the curriculum, the author has revised the content of the course to give the students an opportunity to understand that different unit operations can be applied in various industries, namely food, biochemical, and biotechnology. The experiments have been decreased from 14 to 8 so the students could have a better grasp of the theories and applications. Students’ responses showed that it is important to design the experiments in a way to stimulate their desire to learn and perform. The author found that it is possible to give the students a better view of the various unit operations in bioprocess engineering. Page 9.1342.1 Page 1 Introduction As defined by Shuler and Kargi (2002), “Bioprocess engineers are engineers working to apply the principles of various disciplines, such as chemical, mechanical, electrical, and industrial, to processes based on using living cells or subcomponents of such cells.” In other words, bioprocess engineers are engineers who process biological materials to produce useful goods for society. Without question, bioprocess engineering is a broad-based engineering discipline. As educators, it is our job to broaden the view of the students, so they can take advantage of numerous, diverse job opportunities presented to them when they finish their BS degree.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sequential-Clustered Method for Dynamic Chemical Plant Simulation
    Con~purers them. Engng, Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 161-177, 1990 0098-I 354/90 %3.00 + 0.00 Printed an Great Britain. All rights reserved Copyright 6 1990 Pergamon Press plc THE SEQUENTIAL-CLUSTERED METHOD FOR DYNAMIC CHEMICAL PLANT SIMULATION J. C. FAGLEY’ and B. CARNAHAN* ‘B. P. America Research and Development Co., Cleveland, OH 44128, U.S.A. ‘Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Ml 48109, U.S.A. (Rrreiwd 28 May 1987; final revision received 26 June 1989; received for publicarion 11 July 1989) Abstract-We describe the design, development and testing of a prototype simulator to study problems associated with robust and efficient solution of dynamic process problems, particularly for systems with models containing moderately to very stiff ordinary differential equations and associated algebraic equations. A new predictor-corrector integration strategy and modular dynamic simulator architecture allow for simultaneous treatment of equations arising from individual modules (equipment units), clusters of modules, or in the limit, all modules associated with a process. This “sequential-clustered” method allows for sequential and simultaneous modular integration as extreme cases. Testing of the simulator using simple but nontrivial plant models indicates that the clustered integration strategy is often the best choice, with good accuracy, reasonable execution time and moderate storage requirements. INTRODUCTION simulator and includes results of tests on simulator performance. Direct numerical comparisons of Two major stumbling blocks in the development alternative integration strategies are given for some of robust dynamic chemical process simulators are: relatively simple test plants. Conclusions and recom- (1) mathematical models for many important equip- mendations drawn from our experiences should be ment types give rise to quite large systems of ordinary of interest to other workers developing dynamic differential equations (ODES); and (2) these ODE simulation software.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Downstream Processing Continuous and Robust a Virtual Roundtable S
    BIOPROCESS TECHNICAL Making Downstream Processing Continuous and Robust A Virtual Roundtable S. Anne Montgomery, Cheryl Scott, and Peter Satzer, with Margit Holzer, Miriam Monge, Ralph Daumke, and Alexander Faude urrent biomanufacturing is driven to pursue continuous processing for cost reduction and increased productivity, Cespecially for monoclonal antibody (MAb) production and manufacturing. Although many technologies are now available and have been implemented in biodevelopment, implementation for large-scale production is still in its infancy. In a lively roundtable discussion at the BPI West conference in Santa Clara, CA (11 March 2019), participants touched on a number of important issues still to be resolved and technologies that are still in need of implementation at large scale. Below, moderator Peter Satzer (senior scientist RENTSCHLER BIOPHARMA (WWW.RENTSCHLER-BIOPHARMA.COM) with the Austrian Center of Industrial Biotechnology, Vienna) summarizes key points raised in that session. Based on Requirements for integration without the need for hold his highlights, BPI asked a number of Continuous Downstream tanks between unit operations requires industry representatives to comment on further exploration. those points further, and their Applications Chromatography Operations: Some responses follow. by Peter Satzer unit operations such as flow-through chromatography and single-pass, Minimizing Buffer and Hold Tanks: One tangential-flow filtration (SPTFF) can be critical parameter is integration of unit integrated easily into a continuous Product Focus: Biologics operations on manufacturing shop downstream process scheme at any floors using minimum numbers of point because they offer constant inflow Process Focus: Downstream buffer tanks and hold tanks. The benefit and outflow of material. Such operations processing of continuous manufacturing can be can be called truly or fully continuous.
    [Show full text]
  • Ac 2011-1640: Unit Operations Lab Bazaar
    AC 2011-1640: UNIT OPERATIONS LAB BAZAAR Michael E Prudich, Ohio University Mike Prudich is a professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Ohio Uni- versity were he has been for 27 years. Prior to joining the faculty at Ohio University, he was a senior research engineering at Gulf Research and Development Company in Pittsburgh, PA primarily working in the area of synthetic fuels. Daina Briedis, Michigan State University DAINA BRIEDIS is a faculty member in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University. Dr. Briedis has been involved in several areas of education research includ- ing student retention, curriculum redesign, and the use of technology in the classroom. She is a co-PI on two NSF grants in the areas of integration of computation in engineering curricula and in developing comprehensive strategies to retain early engineering students. She is active nationally and internationally in engineering accreditation and is a Fellow of ABET. Robert Y. Ofoli, Michigan State University ROBERT Y. OFOLI is an associate professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materi- als Science at Michigan State University. He has had a long interest in teaching innovations, and has used a variety of active learning protocols in his courses. His research interests include biosensors for biomedical applications, optical and electrochemical characterization of active nanostructured interfaces, nanocatalytic conversion of biorenewables to commodity chemicals and fuels, and nanoscale production of hydrogen on demand. Robert B. Barat, New Jersey Institute of Technology Robert Barat is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at NJIT, where he has been a faculty member for over 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Chemical Process Modeling
    Course Chemical Process Modeling Basic Information Course «Chemical Process Modeling» will provide you with the advanced knowledge and skills to training in use of modelling and simulation approaches, and their application to practical problems of relevance to chemical and refinery industries. This is a course, which contributes to MSc award in Petroleum Chemistry and Refining Title of the Master's Degree Programs in English “Petroleum Chemistry and Academic Program Refining” Type of the course core /mandatory Course period From December 1st till December 31st, 1 semester (5 weeks) Study credits 4 ECTS credits Duration 144 hours Language of English instruction BSc degree in Petroleum Engineering, Engineering, Chemistry , , Academic Environmental Sciences or equivalent (transcript of records), requirements good command of English (certificate or other official document) Course Description The course of «Chemical Process Modeling» provided a curriculum of master’s program 04.04.01.10 «Petroleum chemistry and refining». Chemical Process Modeling considers a systematic approach to the creation of information systems of modeling and design of complex chemical-technological processes. The students are introduced to the methods of computer simulation of engineering systems as used within the chemical and refinery industry, for the prediction of the (steady-state) behavior and performance of various technology processes such as separation processes, heat transfer and chemical conversions. Special Features of the Course (module) Chemical Process
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Process Simulation Using Openmodelica Priyam Nayak, Pravin Dalve, Rahul Anandi Sai, Rahul Jain, Kannan M
    Chemical Process Simulation Using OpenModelica Priyam Nayak, Pravin Dalve, Rahul Anandi Sai, Rahul Jain, Kannan M. Moudgalya, P. R. Naren, Peter Fritzson and Daniel Wagner The self-archived postprint version of this journal article is available at Linköping University Institutional Repository (DiVA): http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-159151 N.B.: When citing this work, cite the original publication. Nayak, P., Dalve, P., Sai, R. A., Jain, R., Moudgalya, K. M., Naren, P. R., Fritzson, P., Wagner, D., (2019), Chemical Process Simulation Using OpenModelica, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 58(26), 11164-11174. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00104 Original publication available at: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00104 Copyright: American Chemical Society http://pubs.acs.org/ Article Cite This: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX pubs.acs.org/IECR Chemical Process Simulation Using OpenModelica † † † † † Priyam Nayak, Pravin Dalve, Rahul Anandi Sai, Rahul Jain, Kannan M. Moudgalya,*, ‡ ¶ § P. R. Naren, Peter Fritzson, and Daniel Wagner † Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, India ‡ School of Chemical & Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613 401, India ¶ Linkoping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden § Independent Researcher, Manaus 69053-020, Brazil ABSTRACT: The equation-oriented general-purpose simulator OpenModelica provides a convenient, extendible modeling environ- ment, with capabilities such as an easy switch from steady-state to dynamic simulations. This work reports the creation of a library of steady-state models of unit operations using OpenModelica. The use of this library is demonstrated through a few representative flow- sheets, and the results are compared with the steady-state simulators Aspen Plus and DWSIM.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Phenomena Vs Unit Operations Approach
    Chapter 2 Transport Phenomena vs Unit Operations Approach The history of Unit Operations is interesting. As indicated in the previous chapter, chemical engineering courses were originally based on the study of unit processes and/or industrial technologies. However, it soon became apparent that the changes produced in equipment from different industries were similar in nature, i.e., there was a commonality in the mass transfer operations in the petroleum industry as with the utility industry. These similar operations became known as Unit Operations. This approach to chemical engineering was promulgated in the Little report discussed earlier, and has, with varying degrees and emphasis, dominated the profession to this day. The Unit Operations approach was adopted by the profession soon after its inception. During the 130 years (since 1880) that the profession has been in existence as a branch of engineering, society’s needs have changed tremendously and so has chemical engineering. The teaching of Unit Operations at the undergraduate level has remained rela- tively unchanged since the publication of several early- to mid-1900 texts. However, by the middle of the 20th century, there was a slow movement from the unit operation concept to a more theoretical treatment called transport phenomena or, more simply, engineering science. The focal point of this science is the rigorous mathematical description of all physical rate processes in terms of mass, heat, or momentum crossing phase boundaries. This approach took hold of the education/curriculum of the profession with the publication of the first edition of the Bird et al. book.(1) Some, including both authors of this text, feel that this concept set the profession back several decades since graduating chemical engineers, in terms of training, were more applied physicists than traditional chemical engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • COCOP - EC Grant Agreement: 723661 Public
    Ref. Ares(2019)525674 - 30/01/2019 COCOP - EC Grant Agreement: 723661 Public Project information Project title Coordinating Optimisation of Complex Industrial Processes Project acronym COCOP Project call H2020-SPIRE-2016 Grant number 723661 Project duration 1.10.2016-31.3.2020 (42 months) Document information Deliverable number D4.6 Deliverable title Modelling guideline document and demonstration development kit (update) Version 1.0 Dissemination level Public Work package WP4 Authors VTT Contributing partners TUDO, OPT Delivery date 31.1.2019 Planned delivery month M28 Keywords Modelling, tools, workflow, digital maturity, human factors This project has received European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation funding under grant agreement No 723661. COCOP - EC Grant Agreement: 723661 Public This project has received European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation funding under grant agreement No 723661. COCOP - EC Grant Agreement: 723661 Public VERSION HISTORY Version Description Organisation Date 0.1 Skeleton VTT 22.11.18 0.2 Added MOSAIC VTT 22.11.18 0.3 Digital Maturity, simulators, HF Milestones VTT 14.12.18 0.4 Cleansing VTT 19.12.18 0.5 Executive summary & cleansing VTT 2.1.2019 0.6 Updates per review comments VTT 21.1.2019 1.0 Final checks VTT 28.1.2019 VERSION HISTORY COCOP - EC Grant Agreement: 723661 Public EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This deliverable continues the work reported in deliverable D4.4 "Modelling guideline document and demonstration development kit". The work has progressed on two fronts, simulation tools supporting COCOP and the COCOP implementation workflow. On the former, we present a review of numerous simulators and delve deeper into the most promising ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Process Analysis and Simulation in Chemical Engineering
    Process Analysis and Simulation in Chemical Engineering Iva´n Darı´o Gil Chaves Javier Ricardo Guevara Lopez Jose´ Luis Garcı´a Zapata Alexander Leguizamon Robayo Gerardo Rodrı´guez Nino~ Process Analysis and Simulation in Chemical Engineering Iva´n Darı´o Gil Chaves Javier Ricardo Guevara Lopez Chemical and Environmental Engineering Y&V - Bohorquez Ingenierı´a Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogota´, Colombia Bogota´, Colombia Alexander Leguizamon Robayo Jose´ Luis Garcı´a Zapata Chemical Engineering Processing Technologies Norwegian University of Science Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures and Technology Edmonton, AB, Canada Trondheim, Norway Gerardo Rodrı´guez Nino~ Chemical and Environmental Engineering National University of Colombia Bogota´, Colombia ISBN 978-3-319-14811-3 ISBN 978-3-319-14812-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-14812-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2015955604 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication.
    [Show full text]