DOCSLIB.ORG

Ben Sira 32.15): an Examination of the History of Darash and Its InUence on the Acts of the Apostles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ben Sira 32.15): an Examination of the History of Darash and Its InUence on the Acts of the Apostles Durham E-Theses `Whoever seeks the Law will be lled with it' (Ben Sira 32.15): An examination of the history of darash and its inuence on the Acts of the Apostles COUSINS, FRANCIS,COLMAN How to cite: COUSINS, FRANCIS,COLMAN (2019) `Whoever seeks the Law will be lled with it' (Ben Sira 32.15): An examination of the history of darash and its inuence on the Acts of the Apostles, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/13397/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 ‘Whoever seeks the Law will be filled with it’ (Ben Sira 32.15): An examination of the history of darash and its influence on the Acts of the Apostles by Francis Cousins A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy Department of Theology and Religion Durham University 2019 1 Francis Cousins ‘Whoever seeks the Law will be filled with it’ (Ben Sira 32.15): An examination of the history of darash and its influence on the Acts of the Apostles Abstract This thesis contributes to the discussion of midrash in the New Testament (NT). It begins by investigating the history of the word darash, particularly its usage in a number of texts (the Tanak, Ben Sira, the Dead Sea Scrolls [DSS], and the Mishnah), the majority of which precede the composition of the NT. The results of the investigation indicate that the verbal form darash, from which midrash derives its name, was used with the sense of textual interpretation in the book of Ben Sira, and the DSS. An examination of the translation of darash in the Septuagint, shows linguistic connections to the genre of zētēsis, which has its roots in those who defended the poet Homer from criticism. Zētēsis has close links to midrash from a linguistic perspective and in the techniques used by the proponents of both. An examination of both the Hellenistic Jewish background of authors such as Demetrius, and Philo, in addition to the Hebrew texts such as Ben Sira and the DSS permits NT texts to be viewed from new perspectives. An examination of Acts, and the Council of Jerusalem in particular, shows that Luke uses the term zh/thsiv to describe the debate which takes place. Luke uses this term exclusively with relation to questions of Jewish law. This means that the decision as to whether Gentile Christians must adhere to the law of Moses is a legal debate, and the Apostolic Decree regulates Gentile Christians’ relationship to that law. 2 Contents Abstract 2 Contents 3 Abbreviations 6 Declaration 7 Copyright 8 Acknowledgements 9 1. Introduction 10 1.1 Methodology 18 1.1.1 Methodological Approach 18 1.2 Literature Review 21 1.2.1 Traditional-historical approach to midrash: Renée Bloch; Géza Vermès 23 1.2.2 The Legal-instructional model: Johann Maier and Paul Mandel 27 1.2.3 Midrash as Literary Genre: Philip Alexander; Michael Fishbane 34 1.2.4 Midrash and the NT: A. T. Hanson; Susan Docherty 39 1.2.5 zh/thsiv in the NT: Meir Gertner; George Parsenios 43 1.3 Evaluation of Literature Review 48 1.3.1 Defining Midrash 48 1.3.2 Studies on Midrash and the New Testament 49 1.3.3 The Hellenistic Background 50 1.4 Summary of Dissertation 50 2. ‘Seeking the Lord’: The use of #rd in the Tanak 53 2.1 Translating and Categorising the sense(s) of #rd in the Tanak 53 2.1.2 The Original meaning of #rd 54 2.2 Senses of #rd in the Tanak 55 2.3 Objects of #rd 56 2.4 Ezra 7.10 60 2.5 Midrash in the Tanak 66 2.6 Conclusions on use of #rd in the Tanak 68 3. The use of #rd and #rdm in the Dead Sea Scrolls 71 3.1 Introduction 72 3.2 Key occurrences of #rd in the DSS 77 3.2.1 Serekh: A Studying Community 77 3.2.1.1 1QS 6.6-8: ‘A man to interpret the law day and night’ 82 3.2.1.2 1 QS 8.10-16: Preparing a Way of Study 89 3.2.2 4Q Serekh Texts 93 3.2.3 Conclusions on the use of #rd and #rdm in Serekh 93 3.3 The Damascus Document: A community who seeks God 96 3.3.1 CD 6.2-11: Digging a well 98 3.3.2 Midrash of the Eschatological Torah? 102 3 3.4 ‘Seekers After Smooth Things’ and the Interpreter of the Law 104 3.4.1 Seekers After Smooth Things 105 3.4.2 Interpreter of the Law 112 3.5 Nistarot and Nigleh 117 3.5.1 4Q375: Testing a True Prophet 121 3.5.2 Conclusions on Nistarot and Nigleh 123 3.6 Midrash in the Dead Sea Scrolls 124 3.6.1 Midrash as a Title 126 3.6.1.1 Midrash as a Title in Serekh and CD 126 3.6.1.2 Midrash as a Title in 4Q174 129 3.6.1.3 Midrash as a Title in 4Q249 132 3.6.1.4 Conclusions on use of Midrash as a Title in the Dead Sea Scrolls 133 3.6.2 Midrash as Biblical Interpretation 134 3.6.3 Midrash as Judicial Enquiry 139 3.6.4 Conclusions on Use of Midrash in the DSS 140 3.7 Conclusions on the use of #rd and #rdm in the DSS 141 4. ‘Whoever seeks the Law will be filled with it’ (Ben Sira 32.15): An analysis of the use of #rd in Ben Sira 143 4.1 Introduction 143 4.1.1 The text of Ben Sira 144 4.2 Ben Sira 3.21-24: ‘hswkmw #wrdt l)’ 149 4.2.1 Sirach 3.21-24 150 4.2.2 Context of Pericope 151 4.2.3 Key terms in 3.21-24 152 4.2.3.1 Wondrous or marvellous things / what is too powerful or difficult 152 4.2.3.2 Evil things 153 4.2.3.3 The nistarot 154 4.2.3.4 Authorised or commanded 156 4.2.4 Greek Philosophy and Apocalyptic Wisdom 158 4.2.4.1 Greek Philosophy 158 4.2.4.2 Mystical and Apocalyptic 159 4.2.4.3 A Compromise 163 4.2.4.4 Conclusion 165 4.3 Ben Sira 32.14-16: ‘Searching the Torah’ 166 4.4 Beth Midrash (Ben S 51.23) 173 4.5 Conclusions on the use of #rd in Ben Sira 176 5. The Use of #rd and #rdm in the Mishnah 179 5.1 Introduction 180 5.2 Form 181 5.2.1 Date 183 5.3 Role of Scripture in the Mishnah 184 5.4 How #rd is used in the Mishnah 187 4 5.4.1 The occurrences of #rd and #rdm in the Mishnah 187 5.4.2 The meaning of #rd 210 5.5 Conclusions on the use of #rd in the Mishnah 215 6. The Translation of #rd in the LXX, and Homeric zētēsis 218 6.1 The translation of #rd in the LXX 221 6.1.1 How zhte/w and e)kzhte/w are used in the LXX 225 6.2 The genre of zētēsis 229 6.2.1 The origins of zētēsis 231 6.2.1.1 Conclusion on the origins of zētēsis 238 6.3 Demetrius the Chronographer 239 6.4 Philo of Alexandria: Questions and Answers on Genesis and Exodus 244 6.5 Legal zētēsis 250 6.6 Conclusions on the genre of zētēsis 251 6.7 Summation of the argument 252 7. ‘That they shall seek God’: Use of zh/thsiv (Seeking, Debate) in Acts 15 255 7.1 Introduction 256 7.2 The Sense of zhte/w in Acts 257 7.3 The Meaning of suzhte/w in Acts 259 7.4 The meaning of zh/thsiv in Acts 266 7.4.1 How does Luke use the term zh/thsiv? 267 7.4.2 What is the Debate at the Council of Jerusalem About? 272 7.4.2.1 The stages of the debate in Acts 15 277 7.4.2.2 Being saved (Acts 15.1) 280 7.4.2.3 Circumcision 282 7.4.2.4 Observing the Law (customs) of Moses (Acts 15.5) 285 7.4.2.5 Pharisaic halakah, or the halakic status of Gentile believers 286 7.4.3 Resolving the Debate 289 7.4.3.1 Peter’s speech (Acts 15.7-11) 290 7.4.3.2 James’s speech (Acts 15.14-21) 293 7.4.4 Conclusion: Gentiles Incorporated into the People of God 300 7.5 What is required of Gentiles? (The Apostolic Decree) 300 7.5.1 Purpose of the Apostolic Decree 301 7.5.2 Sources of the Apostolic Decree 304 7.6 Conclusions: A zh/thsiv solved by divine revelation and Scripture 308 7.7 Excursus on the use of suzhte/w in Mark 313 8.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Christian Understandings of Proselytism David A
    Christian Understandings of Proselytism David A. Kerr ike the chameleon, proselytism displays itself in many who had themselves been strangers (gerim) in Egypt (Deut. L shades of color. The word has different nuances in 10:19). The bulk of Talmudic literature welcomes the proselyte individual languages and among languages. Importantly from into the full fellowship of Israel, subject to the requirements of the point of view of this article, it is used variously among circumcision, baptism, and the offering of sacrifice. Jesus criti­ different sectors of the Christian church. It refers both to the cized what he deemed the Pharisaic tendency of making the transfer of allegiance from one religion to another and to the proselyte a slave to the law (Matt. 23:15). From this it may be transfer of allegiancebetweenchurches. Attitudes to proselytism inferred that the matter of how a proselyte should be incorpo­ are conditioned by political, social, and cultural considerations, rated into Israel was a matter of controversy in Jesus' time. New and responses vary from one church to another, from one culture Testament references to Jewish proselytes among the first Chris­ to another. I attempt here to clarify some of the issues, particu­ tians indicate that they were welcome members of the early larly as they have emerged in Christian thinking through the church (Acts 2:10; 6:5; 13:43).6 The postbiblical histories of both second half of the twentieth century. I argue tha t the hard-sought Judaism and Christianity continued to honor the proselyte until consensus that has emerged within the ecumenical movement more recent times, when, roughly speaking from the eighteenth needs to extend itself further to include new global realities of century, the term came to have the negative connotations we Christianity.1 have noted in English literary usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Edition
    Meorot A Forum of Modern Orthodox Discourse (formerly Edah Journal) Marheshvan 5768 CONTENTS Editor’s Introduction to the Marheshvan 5768 Edition Eugene Korn ARTICLES Farteitcht un Farbessert (On “Correcting” Maimonides) Menachem Kellner Ethics and Warfare Revisited Gerald J. Blidstein Michael J. Broyde Women's Eligibility to Write Sifrei Torah Jen Taylor Friedman Dov Linzer Authority and Validity: Why Tanakh Requires Interpretation, and What Makes an Interpretation Legitimate? Moshe Sokolow REVIEW ESSAY Maimonides Contra Kabbalah: A Review of Maimonides’ Confrontation with Mysticism by Menachem Kellner James A. Diamond Meorot 6:2 Marheshvan 5768 A Publication of Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbini cal School © 2007 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE t Meorot: A Forum of Modern Orthodox Discourse (formerly The Edah Journal) Statement of Purpose Meorot is a forum for discussion of Orthodox Judaism’s engagement with modernity, o published by Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbinical School. It is the conviction of Meorot that this discourse is vital to nurturing the spiritual and religious experiences of Modern Orthodox Jews. Committed to the norms of halakhah and Torah, Meorot is dedicated to free inquiry and will be ever mindful that “Truth is the seal of the Holy One, Blessed be He.” r Editors Eugene Korn, Editor Nathaniel Helfgot, Associate Editor Joel Linsider, Text Editor o Editorial Board Dov Linzer (YCT Rabbinical School), Chair Michael Berger Moshe Halbertal (Israel) e Naftali Harcsztark Norma Baumel Joseph Simcha Krauss Barry Levy Adam Mintz Tamar Ross (Israel) A Forum of Modern Orthodox Discourse M Meorot will publish two online editions per year, and will be available periodically in hard- copy editions.
    [Show full text]
  • Acts 15 and the Jerusalem Council
    Acts 15 and the Jerusalem Council Did they conclude the Torah was not for Gentiles? ------------------------------------------------- Tim Hegg • TorahResource © 2008 TorahResource • All rights reserved • (revised from 2001 edition) “Even the Apostles admitted the Torah was a burden no one could bear!” Such a statement characterizes a common sentiment about the Torah—one based upon an equally common inter- pretation of Acts 15 and the Jerusalem Council. But let us look again at Acts 15 and the decision of the Apostolic Council convened in Jerusalem. What was the issue at hand? What had brought about the need for the Council in the first place? And how should the decision of the Apostles be interpreted? What does all of this tell us about the place of the Torah among the early followers of Yeshua? The Core Issue at the Jerusalem Council The opening verses of Acts 15 give us a clear picture of the core issue around which the Jerusalem Council convened: And some men came down from Judea and began teaching the brethren, “Unless you are circum- cised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.” And when Paul and Barnabas had great dissension and debate with them, the brethren determined that Paul and Barnabas and certain others of them should go up to Jerusalem to the apostles and elders concerning this issue.1 The “issue” at hand was whether or not someone who was not a Jew could be saved. To put it another way, how could a Gentile become a covenant member with Israel and share in the bless- ings of the covenant? The prevailing belief of the Judaisms in Paul’s day was that only Jews had a place in the world to come since God had made the covenant of blessing with Israel and no oth- er nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Torah Texts Describing the Revelation at Mt. Sinai-Horeb Emphasize The
    Paradox on the Holy Mountain By Steven Dunn, Ph.D. © 2018 Torah texts describing the revelation at Mt. Sinai-Horeb emphasize the presence of God in sounds (lwq) of thunder, accompanied by blasts of the Shofar, with fire and dark clouds (Exod 19:16-25; 20:18-21; Deut 4:11-12; 5:22-24). These dramatic, awe-inspiring theophanies re- veal divine power and holy danger associated with proximity to divine presence. In contrast, Elijah’s encounter with God on Mt. Horeb in 1 Kings 19:11-12, begins with a similar audible, vis- ual drama of strong, violent winds, an earthquake and fire—none of which manifest divine presence. Rather, it is hqd hmmd lwq, “a voice of thin silence” (v. 12) which manifests God, causing Elijah to hide his face in his cloak, lest he “see” divine presence (and presumably die).1 Revelation in external phenomena present a type of kataphatic experience, while revelation in silence presents a more apophatic, mystical experience.2 Traditional Jewish and Christian mystical traditions point to divine silence and darkness as the highest form of revelatory experience. This paper explores the contrasting theophanies experienced by Moses and the Israelites at Sinai and Elijah’s encounter in silence on Horeb, how they use symbolic imagery to convey transcendent spiritual realities, and speculate whether 1 Kings 19:11-12 represents a “higher” form of revela- tory encounter. Moses and Israel on Sinai: Three months after their escape from Egypt, Moses leads the Israelites into the wilderness of Sinai where they pitch camp at the base of Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Rereading Paul on Circumcision, Torah, and the Gentiles Asha K
    A Seal of Faith: Rereading Paul on Circumcision, Torah, and the Gentiles Asha K. Moorthy Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Asha K. Moorthy All rights reserved ABSTRACT A Seal of Faith: Rereading Paul on Circumcision, Torah, and the Gentiles Asha K. Moorthy It is generally held that the Apostle Paul dismissed the rite of circumcision for Gentiles. This dissertation, however, offers a different perspective. Through examination of relevant sources regarding the role of circumcision in conversion along with consideration of Philo of Alexandria’s depiction of Abraham as an exemplar of and for the proselyte, this project will suggest that Paul, in Rom 4:11‐ 12, uses the example of Abraham in order to explain the value of circumcision for Jews as well as for Gentiles. It will be argued, moreover, that Paul’s objections to circumcision, as found in Romans as well as in Galatians, Philippians, and 1 Corinthians, were not to the rite per se but rather to the notion that circumcision was necessary for entering the Abrahamic covenant, “becoming a Jew,” justification, salvation, spiritual transformation, protection or identity in Christ. A case will be made, moreover, that in Paul’s day there were two competing forms of circumcision and that Paul was opposed to the more radical procedure. Finally, divergences in Paul’s handling of the topic of circumcision in different letters will be explained through attention to particular audience concerns. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Folk Literature
    Oral Tradition, 14/1 (1999): 140-274 Jewish Folk Literature Dan Ben-Amos For Batsheva Four interrelated qualities distinguish Jewish folk literature: (a) historical depth, (b) continuous interdependence between orality and literacy, (c) national dispersion, and (d) linguistic diversity. In spite of these diverging factors, the folklore of most Jewish communities clearly shares a number of features. The Jews, as a people, maintain a collective memory that extends well into the second millennium BCE. Although literacy undoubtedly figured in the preservation of the Jewish cultural heritage to a great extent, at each period it was complemented by orality. The reciprocal relations between the two thus enlarged the thematic, formal, and social bases of Jewish folklore. The dispersion of the Jews among the nations through forced exiles and natural migrations further expanded the themes and forms of their folklore. In most countries Jews developed new languages in which they spoke, performed, and later wrote down their folklore. As a people living in diaspora, Jews incorporated the folklore of other nations while simultaneously spreading their own internationally known themes among the same nations. Although this reciprocal process is basic to the transmission of folklore among all nations, it occurred more intensely among the Jews, even when they lived in antiquity in the Land of Israel. Consequently there is no single period, no single country, nor any single language that can claim to represent the authentic composite Jewish folklore. The earliest known periods of Jewish folklore are no more genuine, in fact, than the later periods, with the result that no specific Jewish ethnic group’s traditions can be considered more ancient or more JEWISH FOLK LITERATURE 141 authentic than those of any of the others.1 The Biblical and Post-Biblical Periods Folklore in the Hebrew Bible Descriptions of Storytelling and Singing The Hebrew Bible describes both the spontaneous and the institutionalized commemoration of historical events.
    [Show full text]
  • Exclusion from the Sanctuary and the City of the Sanctuary in the Temple Scroll
    EXCLUSION FROM THE SANCTUARY AND THE CITY OF THE SANCTUARY IN THE TEMPLE SCROLL by LA WREN CE H. SCHIFFMAN New York University, New York, N. Y. 10012 Introduction The discovery and publication of the Temple Scroll (Yadin, 1977, 1983; abbreviated below as 11 QT) opened new vistas for the study of the history of Jewish law in the Second Commonwealth period. Immedi­ ately after the Hebrew edition of the scroll appeared, debate ensued about whether this scroll was to be seen as an integral part of the corpus authored by the Qumran sect, or simply as a part of its library (cf. Schiffman, 1983a, 1985c). This question was, in turn, related to the problem of whether this text reflects generally held beliefs of most Second Temple Jews, or whether its laws and sacrificial procedures represented only the views of its author(s), who were demanding a thor­ oughgoing revision of the sacrificial worship of the Jerusalem Temple, or, finally, whether it reflected the author's eschatological hopes. This question is crucial in regard to the laws pertaining to various classes of individuals who were to be excluded from the Temple, its city (known in the Temple Scroll as cir hammiqdiis, "the city of the sanc­ tuary" or "Temple city") and the other cities of Israel because of various forms of ritual impurity or other disqualifications. The editor of the scroll, Yigael Yadin, maintained that it represented a point of view substantially stricter than that of the somewhat later tannaitic sources, and that the scroll extended all prohibitions of such impurity to the entire city of Jerusalem at least.
    [Show full text]
  • GOD SAVES a PEOPLE the EXODUS May 22, 2019 Pope
    GOD SAVES A PEOPLE THE EXODUS May 22, 2019 Pope Damasus requested Jerome to revise the Latin translation of the Four Gospels. Jerome did not give a new translation but revised the Latin text in accordance with Greek MSS. In 383 Jerome also revised the Psalter according to the Septuagint. In 387 Jerome became interested in the Hexapla of Origen. He revised the Latin text of the Old Testament according to the Hexaplarian Septuagint. In 390 he translated the Old Testament directly from the Hebrew (took sixteen years). Modern Vulgate is composed of the following parts – Gospels were revised according to the original Greek. Other books of the Old Testament were probably revised but no clear documentation about it. Proto-canonical books (except the Psalter) were directly from the Hebrew. Deutero-canonical books – Tobias and Judith were from the Aramaic. Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Baruch, and Maccabees I and II remained from the Septuagint. Additions in Daniel were from Theodotion and those of Esther were from the Septuagint. ______________________________________________________________________________ Four major theological themes in Exodus 1) Liberation (Exodus 1-15) Social transformation occurs through the intentionality of a new God. 2) Law (Exodus 19-23) Announcement of the will of God affects all aspects of their personal and public life. God who liberates does not limit himself to religious matters. Ten Commandments come directly from the mouth of God. All the rest of the laws in Exodus are given by Moses (designated mediator). Israel devises a stable arrangement to follow the will of God and his purpose. 3) New Covenant (Exodus 32-34) Proclamation of the Law leads to the making of a new or renewed covenant.
    [Show full text]
  • “Wheat from the Chaff” — Establishing the Canon
    Wheat from the Chaff Establishing the Canon Donald E. Knebel May 21, 2017 Slide 1 1. This is the last presentation in this series looking at the human authors and contexts of the books that make up the Protestant Bible. 2. Today, we will look at how the books in the Bible were selected. 3. In the process, we will look at some other writings that were not selected. 4. We will then consider what it means that the Bible is the word of God. Slide 2 1. The Jewish Bible, on which the Protestant Old Testament is based, includes 24 individual books, organized into three sections – the Torah, meaning Teachings; the Nevi’im, meaning Prophets, and the Ketuvim, meaning Writings. 2. The Jewish Bible is called the Tanakh based on the first letter of the three sections. 3. Scholars remain uncertain about exactly when and how those 24 books were selected, with most believing the final selection did not take place until about 100 A.D. 4. By that time, most of the books comprising the New Testament had been written and Christianity had begun to separate from Judaism. Slide 3 1. At the time most of the books of the Protestant Old Testament were being written, the Jewish people did not have a conception of a single book that would encompass all their most important writings. 2. Instead, they had writings from various periods, some considered more reliable than others and all considered subject to revision and replacement. 3. In about 400 A.D., the prophet Nehemiah reported that Ezra had read to the people “the book of the law of Moses,” but says nothing about any other books being important at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • GOES WHERE JESUS GOES Disciple – Part 1 Pastor Keith Stewart August 2, 2020
    2660 Belt Line Road Garland, TX 75044 972.494.5683 www.springcreekchurch.org GOES WHERE JESUS GOES Disciple – Part 1 Pastor Keith Stewart August 2, 2020 Mimeithai means to imitate or mimic something. Tupos means pattern, example, or model. You became imitators (mimeithai) of us and of the Lord; in spite of severe suffering, you welcomed the message with the joy given by the Holy Spirit. 1 Thessalonians 1.6 Follow my example (mimeithai), as I follow the example of Christ. 1 Corinthians 11.1 We did this, not because we do not have the right to such help, but in order to offer ourselves as a model (tupos) for you to imitate. 1 Thessalonians 3.9 It’s like we’re looking for something that we’ve lost. 2660 Belt Line Road Garland, TX 75044 972.494.5683 www.springcreekchurch.org God knew what He was doing from the very beginning. He decided from the outset to shape the lives of those who love him along the same lines as the life of his Son. The Son stands first in the line of humanity He restored. We see the original and intended shape of our lives there in Him. After God made that decision of what His children should be like, He followed it up by calling people by name. After He called them by name, He set them on a solid basis with Himself. And then, after getting them established, He stayed with them to the end, gloriously completing what He had begun. Romans 8.29-30 (Message) “Christianity is making humanity what it ought to be.” – Leroy Forlines 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynasty, Many Canaanites Were Allowed Into Egypt Again but Under Strict Governmental Control
    3.1 DESCRIBE THE ROLE OF CANAANITES IN THE NILE DELTA DURING THE 12TH AND 14TH DYNASTIES. ANSWER: In the second half of the Egyptian 12th dynasty, many Canaanites were allowed into Egypt again but under strict governmental control. Few among the Canaanites found job in Egyptian household as servants other worked in the Egyptian temple state and even served as dancers. Some Canaanites were also brought to Egypt as captives. 3.2 WHAT HAPPENED TO THE CLIMATE AND CULTURE OF EGYPT AFTER THE REIGN OF SESOTRIS III? WHY WOULD THESE CHANGES HAVE BEEN A THREAT TO THE CONTINUATION OF PHARAOH’S RULE? WHY WOULD THIS MAKE A PHARAOH APPRECIATE JOSEPH’S WARNING? ANSWER: After the reign of Sesotris III, many things began to fall apart in Egypt. Nile flood level became erratic. In some years, flood level rose between 12ft and 24ft above the normal food level. Other years the annual flood levels were very low. Low Nile flood level brought famine while high Nile flood level brought great abundance. The Egyptians even taxed people on the basis of high the flood was. However, high Nile flood level brought death and destruction. This erratic food level of Nile brought threat to Pharaoh because he claimed to be in control of Nile food. So a destructive flood levels were a threat to his reign, they question the validity of Pharaoh’s rule. This may have accounted for the reason why rulers followed rulers during these years. Pharaoh lost influence in Canaan and resulted into magic to try to influence events in the North.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eschatology of the Dead Sea Scrolls
    Eruditio Ardescens The Journal of Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary Volume 2 Issue 2 Article 1 February 2016 The Eschatology of the Dead Sea Scrolls J. Randall Price Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/jlbts Part of the Jewish Studies Commons Recommended Citation Price, J. Randall (2016) "The Eschatology of the Dead Sea Scrolls," Eruditio Ardescens: Vol. 2 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/jlbts/vol2/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Eruditio Ardescens by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Eschatology of the Dead Sea Scrolls J. Randall Price, Ph.D. Center for Judaic Studies Liberty University [email protected] Recent unrest in the Middle East regularly stimulates discussion on the eschatological interpretation of events within the biblical context. In light of this interest it is relevant to consider the oldest eschatological interpretation of biblical texts that had their origin in the Middle East – the Dead Sea Scrolls. This collection of some 1,000 and more documents that were recovered from caves along the northwestern shores of the Dead Sea in Israel, has become for scholars of both the Old and New Testaments a window into Jewish interpretation in the Late Second Temple period, a time known for intense messianic expectation. The sectarian documents (non-biblical texts authored by the Qumran Sect or collected by the Jewish Community) among these documents are eschatological in nature and afford the earliest and most complete perspective into the thinking of at least one Jewish group at the time of Jesus’ birth and the formation of the early church.
    [Show full text]