Fisher's Hydraulics Building Addition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fisher's Hydraulics Building Addition Fisher’s Hydraulics Building Addition (5010 E Columbus Drive) Stormwater Management Report Revised March 07, 2017 Prepared for: Prepared by: 1000 N. Ashley Drive Suite 900 Tampa, FL 33602 (813) 620-4500 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................3 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................3 2.1 Ground Cover, Soils, and Wetlands ......................................................................3 2.2 Existing Conditions Drainage ................................................................................3 2.3 Floodplain ............................................................................................................4 3.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS .................................................................................................4 3.1 Water Quality Treatment .....................................................................................4 3.2 Stormwater Attenuation ......................................................................................5 3.2.1 Southern Discharge (E Columbus Drive) ....................................................5 3.2.2 Western Discharge (Spreader Swale near I-4 on-ramp) .............................5 3.3 Floodplain Compensation ....................................................................................6 4.0 STORMWATER SYSTEM OPERATIONS .............................................................................6 4.1 Operation.............................................................................................................6 4.2 Maintenance ........................................................................................................6 4.2.1 Ditches and Swales ...................................................................................6 4.2.2 Inlet grates ...............................................................................................6 4.2.3 Pipes and Inlets ........................................................................................6 4.2.4 Retention/Detention Ponds ......................................................................7 4.2.5 Vegetation ................................................................................................7 4.2.6 Control Structures ....................................................................................7 4.2.7 Sediment Sumps Structures ......................................................................7 4.2.8 Contingency Planting Details for Wetland Impact Areas ...........................8 1 APPENDICES Appendix A Maps Location Map FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Aerial Appendix B NRCS Soils Map & Information Appendix C Existing Conditions Basin Map & Node-Link Diagram Appendix D Existing Basin CN & Tc Calculations Appendix E Existing Conditions ICPR Model - Input Data Appendix F Existing Conditions ICPR Model – Basin Summary Appendix G Existing Conditions ICPR Model – Node Max. Report Appendix H Proposed Conditions Basin Map & Node-Link Diagram Appendix I Proposed Basin CN & Tc Calculations Appendix J Proposed Conditions ICPR Model – Input Data Appendix K Proposed Conditions ICPR Model – Basin Summary Appendix L Proposed Conditions ICPR Model – Node Max. Report Appendix M FDEP Impaired Basin Exhibit Appendix N Treatment Calculations Appendix O Storm Tabulations [On-site and Off-site (incl. FDOT plans)] Appendix P 17th Ave. R/W Vacation Documents Appendix Q Proof of Ownership – Deeds Appendix R Disturbed Area Exhibit Appendix S Pond 100 By-pass Swale Capacity Computations 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Applicant operates a six-bay hydraulics repair shop located at 5010 E. Columbus Drive (near the intersection of US-41 and Interstate 4). The Owner wishes to expand operations by constructing a second repair shop on several existing vacant lots located immediately east of his current facility. The proposed building addition and associated site improvements will be incorporated into a single compound. The buildings will share site infrastructure as well as a unified stormwater management system. The existing repair facility is served by a ‘dry’ stormwater management facility that utilizes an Effluent Filtration System. In an effort to consolidate open space, the stormwater management system for the existing and proposed buildings will be combined into a single system located north of E. 17th Avenue. The proposed wet detention stormwater pond will have dual outfalls in order to mimic the existing condition drainage pattern (a spreader swale discharging to the west and a drop structure that utilizes the existing piped discharge connection to the E. Columbus Dr. municipal separate storm sewer system [MS4]). 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Ground Cover, Soils, and Wetlands A geotechnical investigation report dated July 31, 2016 was prepared by Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated (DESI) titled “Proposed Expansion 5010 Columbus Drive Hillsborough County, Florida”. The site investigation found a soil profile consisting of fine sands extending to the termination of boring (12 to 18 ft.). Soils throughout the profile were represented primarily by the SP to SP-SM Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) designation with some SM soils noted in the report. Seasonal High Water elevation noted in the Geotechnical report was influenced by rain events that occurred shortly before the field work was conducted and does not consider the impact of the site’s adjacency to the existing linear pond located adjacent to the I-4 on-ramp. In order to maintain sustainable water levels necessary to support the proposed littoral shelf, the proposed stormwater management system is designed with a control elevation equal to that permitted by FDOT with ERP 43-20690.01. The proposed consolidated stormwater management system has a proposed control elevation of 31.50 ft. (NAVD). There are no known wetlands located within the limits of proposed work. 2.2 Drainage The existing repair facility drains via sheet flow north to the stormwater management facility for water quality treatment and attenuation prior to being discharged into the City’s MS4 located within E Columbus Drive. Additionally, the existing undeveloped lots located between the 3 existing repair shop and N. 51st Street drain to a headwall that is connected to the pond outfall pipe and discharges to the E Columbus MS4. The area north of E. 17th Avenue generally drains west-northwest via sheet flow to the existing linear pond located adjacent to I-4. The presence of a driveway cut onto E. Columbus Drive indicates that the proposed project area has been previously developed. However, since historical aerial photographs indicate that it has been vacant since before 1995, the stormwater management design is based on this area being pervious in the existing conditions. The discharge rates associated with the existing stormwater pond were determined by creating an ICPR model using survey data to compute existing storage volume and the dimensions associated with various reaches. Table 2.1 – Pre-Development Peak Inflow into Boundary Nodes 5-yr/24-hr Inflow Rate Node Notes (cfs) Columbus 5.74 Pond 800-3 6.31 2.3 Floodplain Based on the Federal Emergency Management (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panel #12057C0359H effective August 28, 2008 (refer to Appendix A), the project is located within Zone ‘X’ (areas outside the 0.20% annual flood probability). 3.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS The proposed stormwater management facility is designed to provide pre/post attenuation for the 25-yr/24-hr storm event so that post development discharge rates do not exceed those occurring in the existing conditions. This pre/post attenuation criteria was applied to both of the proposed ponds discharge points and proposed discharge rates are included in Appendix L for your review. 3.1 Water Quality Treatment The project site is located within the ‘Uceta Yard Drain’ basin (WBID 1599). This WBID is impaired for Fecal Coliform and Mercury. While this basin does have elevated dissolved oxygen levels, they are not attributed to elevated nitrogen of phosphorus values. Therefore, net improvement water quality improvement is not required. 4 The proposed design will employ conventional prescriptive wet detention treatment criteria. The wet detention treatment system captures the first one-inch of runoff from the contributing basin. This Required Water Quality Treatment Volume (WQTV) is then stacked between the seasonal high water level (SHWL)/Control Elevation and the Overflow Elevation. This type of system utilizes a bleed down orifice (or weir) to drain the treatment volume in 120-hours (5 days) with no more than one-half the total volume being discharged within the first 60-hours (2.5 days). Refer to Table 3.1a for the required water quality treatment volume, volume provided, weir size, and treatment stage. Refer to Appendix O for additional information. Table 3.1a – Wet Detention Treatment Basin Required Provided Treatment Orifice Size Treatment Area WQTV WQTV System (in) Stage (ft.) (Acres) (ac-ft.) (ac-ft.) 0.75” Pond 100 2.46 0.205 0.221 (Circular 32.90 Orifice) 3.2 Stormwater Attenuation 3.2.1 Southern Discharge (E. Columbus Drive) For the contributing drainage basin historically draining south to E. Columbus Drive, attenuation is provided such that the post-development 25-yr/24-hr discharge rates are equal to or less than the pre-development 25-yr/24-hr runoff within the
Recommended publications
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Discusses the Various Design/Build Alternatives, As Well As the No-Build Alternative
    SUMMARY AND COMMITMENTS S.1 INTRODUCTION The potential for high speed rail to address a portion of the transportation needs of the State of Florida has a long history. The current effort to evaluate high speed rail’s potential was initiated following an enactment by Florida’s voters. In November 2000, Florida’s voters adopted an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Florida that mandated the construction of a high speed transportation system in the state. The amendment required the use of train technologies that operate at speeds in excess of 120 miles per hour (mph) and consist of dedicated rails or guideways separated from motor vehicle traffic. The system was to link the five largest urban areas of Florida and construction was mandated to begin by November 1, 2003, to address a high speed ground transportation system. The purpose of Article 10, Section 19 of the Constitution of the State of Florida was, “to reduce traffic congestion and provide alternatives to the traveling public.” In June 2001, the Florida State Legislature, through the Florida High Speed Rail Authority Act, created the Florida High Speed Rail Authority (FHSRA) and charged the organization with the responsibility for planning, administering, and implementing a high speed rail system in Florida. The act also mandated that the initial segment of the system be developed and operated between St. Petersburg, Tampa, and Orlando areas with future service to the Miami area. Following its creation in 2001, the FHSRA proceeded to implement the responsibilities set forth in the Florida High Speed Rail Authority Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Mobility Technical Memorandum
    HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY MPO 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FREIGHT MOBILITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Hillsborough County Metropolitan Planning Organization 601 East Kennedy Blvd. – 18th Floor Tampa, FL 33601 (813) 272-5940 www.hillsboroughmpo.org The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant(s) from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f) of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. April 2009 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Freight Mobility Technical Memorandum TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... I-1 1.0 FREIGHT MOBILITY IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ............................................ 1-1 1.1 Existing and Emerging FACs ........................................................................ 1-1 1.1.1 Anderson Road/Tampa International Airport ..................................... 1-4 1.1.2 Port Tampa ........................................................................................ 1-4 1.1.3 Hooker’s Point (Port of Tampa) ......................................................... 1-4 1.1.4 Rockport/Port Sutton/Pendola Point (Port of Tampa) ....................... 1-4 1.1.5 Alafia River (Port of Tampa) .............................................................. 1-4 1.1.6
    [Show full text]
  • Group Name Planning Unit County (-Ies) WBID Water Segment Name Number
    OGC Cycle Group Case Group Name Planning Unit County (-ies) WBID Water Segment Name Number Choctawhatchee - Little Bear Creek (South 3 3 16-0477 St. Andrews Bay Bay, Calhoun 1041 St. Andrew Fork) Choctawhatchee - 3 3 16-0479 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061A West Bay St. Andrew Choctawhatchee - 3 3 16-0478 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061A West Bay St. Andrew Choctawhatchee - St Andrews Bay (North 2 3 10-0533 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061B St. Andrew Segment) Choctawhatchee - 1 3 05-1148 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061BB Carl Gray Park St. Andrew Choctawhatchee - 1 3 05-1150 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061CB Beach Drive St. Andrew Choctawhatchee - 3 3 16-0480 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061E St Andrew Bay (Mouth) St. Andrew Choctawhatchee - 1 3 05-1151 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061EB Delwood St. Andrew Choctawhatchee - 1 3 05-1152 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061F East Bay (E) St. Andrew Choctawhatchee - 3 3 16-0481 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061F East Bay (East Segment) St. Andrew Choctawhatchee - 1 3 05-1153 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061FB Dupont Bridge St. Andrew Choctawhatchee - North Bay (North 2 3 10-0539 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061G St. Andrew Segment1) Choctawhatchee - North Bay (North 3 3 16-0482 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061G St. Andrew Segment1) Choctawhatchee - North Bay (North 3 3 16-0483 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061H St. Andrew Segment2) Choctawhatchee - North Bay (North 3 3 16-0484 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061H St. Andrew Segment2) Choctawhatchee - 3 3 16-0485 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1086 Mill Bayou St. Andrew Choctawhatchee - 2 3 10-0487 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum Restoration Program MFMP Purchase Order Issuance June 29 - July 5, 2017
    Petroleum Restoration Program MFMP Purchase Order Issuance June 29 - July 5, 2017 PO Order PO Start PO End No. FAC ID Req ID PO # PO Title Total Contract Supplier Site Manager Phase Date Date Date DEP-PETRO-FY17/18-138503828-846-005B-BP PRINCETON- 1 138503828 PR10164969 B16A08 7/5/2017 SA/RAC-JDR $17,632.25 GC846 GHD Services, Inc. 7/5/2017 4/30/2018 Robert Graessel (Contracts) SA/RAC DEP-PETRO-FY17/18-138505024-883-010B-SUNSHINE #202- Trident Treatment & Dewatering, LLC 2 138505024 PR10164978 B16A0C 7/5/2017 WASC-JDR $10,761.83 GC883 dba MAS Environmental 7/5/2017 1/2/2018 Roberto Rodriguez (Contracts) WASC DEP-PETRO-FY17/18-428511361-779-027C-FL CITRUS CTR #30- Trident Treatment & Dewatering, LLC 3 428511361 PR10165010 B16A18 7/5/2017 WASC-JDR $3,904.40 GC779 dba MAS Environmental 7/5/2017 12/20/2017 Alison Long (Contracts) WASC DEP-PETRO-FY16/17-468512379-785-049C-GULF COAST Advanced Environmental 4 468512379 PR10158183 B1606F 6/29/2017 PROPERTIES #101 LLC-NAM/SA-BAW $40,824.37 GC785 Technologies, LLC 6/29/2017 7/16/2018 David Yazak (Contracts) NAM/SA DEP-PETRO-FY16/17-528842192-783-032A-BOBS CARPET 5 528842192 PR10159853 B162B3 7/3/2017 MART-LSA-JDR $41,744.00 GC783 Value Environmental Services, Inc. 7/3/2017 4/4/2018 Brendon Ducham (Contracts) LSA DEP-PETRO-FY17/18-528515125-730-023A-AIRPORT SERVICE 6 528515125 PR10162392 B165D3 6/30/2017 CTR-LSA-JDR $36,808.43 GC730 Aerostar SES, LLC 6/30/2017 3/21/2018 Loury Migliorelli (Contracts) LSA DEP-PETRO-FY16/17-089201724-883-020C-BALLOON BARN- Trident Treatment & Dewatering, LLC 7 089201724 PR10162790 B1668F 7/3/2017 WASC-KMM $2,645.88 GC883 dba MAS Environmental 7/3/2017 11/29/2017 Don Simpson (Contracts) WASC DEP-PETRO-FY16/17-298627461-770-021A-SEARS ROEBUCK & 8 298627461 PR10163148 B1672E 7/3/2017 CO #8095-LSA-JDR $36,963.31 GC770 PPM Consultants 7/3/2017 3/26/2018 Brendon Ducham (Contracts) LSA DEP-PETRO-FY16/17-559800055-825-006C-BOZARD FORD CO- 9 559800055 PR10163709 B167BA 7/3/2017 NAM-KMM $14,038.20 GC825 Terracon Consultants, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3 Affected Environment
    SECTION 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3.1 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS This section details socio-economic conditions including population, housing, employment, and income characteristics. 3.1.1 Population Characteristics The study area for the Florida High Speed Rail (FHSR) project extends from downtown Tampa in Hillsborough County (Corridor A), through Polk and Osceola counties, and terminates in the city of Orlando in Orange County (Corridor E) (Section 2, Figure 2-1). The counties in this central Florida region are experiencing tremendous growth and are projected to continue this growth pattern in the short-term and long-term future. In each county, a majority of the population resides in unincorporated regions and this trend is projected to continue into the short- term and long-term future. Table 3-1 illustrates county population growth that occurred between the years 1980, 1990, and 2000; population projections for the years 2010 and 2020; and the population percentage change by county and state between the years 1980-1990, 1990-2000, and 2000-2020. Table 3-1 Population Statistics by County and in Florida 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 Percent Percent Percent Change 1980 1990 1980- 2000 2010 2020 Change 1990- 1990 2000-2020 2000 Florida 9,746,961 12,938,071 32.7 15,982,378 23.5 18,776,000 21,683,300 35.7 Hillsborough 646,939 834,054 28.9 998,948 19.8 1,153,100 1,314,100 31.5 Polk 321,652 405,382 26.0 483,924 19.4 554,900 628,200 29.8 Osceola 49,287 107,728 118.6 172,493 60.1 231,500 294,300 70.6 Orange 470,865 677,491 43.9 896,344 32.3 1,112,200 1,338,300 49.3 Source: Florida Statistical Abstract, 2001 Note: Projections are medium projections and rounded to (1,000's).
    [Show full text]
  • Minimum Flows for the Tampa Bypass Canal, Tampa
    Minimum Flows for the Tampa Bypass Canal. Tampa, Fl. Southwest Florida Water Management District Ecologic Evaluation Section Draft May 15, 2005 Circa 1913 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ May 15, 2005 Draft Minimum Flows for the Tampa Bypass Canal May 15, 2004 - Draft Ecologic Evaluation Section Resource Conservation and Development Department Southwest Florida Water Management District Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 The Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) does not discriminate upon the basis of any individual’s disability status. This non-discriminatory policy involves every aspect of the District’s functions, including one’s access to, participation, employment, or treatment in its programs and activities. Anyone requiring accommodation as provided for in the American with Disabilities Act should contact (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476, extension 4215; TDD ONLY 1-800-231-6103; FAX (352) 754-6749. _________________________________________________________________________________________________ May 15, 2005 Draft EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) is mandated by the legislature (Section 373.042, Florida Statutes) to protect water resources and ecology from ‘significant harm’ due to withdrawals. The minimum flow is defined as the minimum amount of water (or water level) that will prohibit significant harm. It is termed the minimum flow and level (MFL). This document establishes the target goals for the resources a priori, and describes the tools used to evaluate the resource response to inflows. In accordance with the Statutes, the MFL is based on best available data. It is not a restorative, optimal or historical flow, although a baseline flow condition was established for reference. The MFL statutes do not make provisions for existing consumptive use withdrawals and thus it was necessary to correct for historical withdrawals/transfers of TBC flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Corridors
    Freight Corridors This technical appendix to the Tampa Bay Regional Goods Movement Study focuses on the regional freight mobility corridors located within the five-county region of Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco, Hernando, and Citrus Counties that together comprise District VII of the Florida Department of Transportation. This document provides a list of regionally significant goods movement corridors to help focus improvement efforts on corridors with the most impact on local and regional economies. These corridors include sections of the Strategic Intermodal System highways, the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS), and regional connectors as well as the CSX rail corridors that serve the Tampa Bay Region. Corridor Highlights: • Location and description of the highway or rail facility and adjacent land use. • Scheduled and planned improvements • Train activity on rail corridors • Freight related problems and corrective actions identified/implemented What you need to know: • This document provides a detailed description of each of the freight mobility corridors. • This document can be used as a starting point to help • Develop long-range comprehensive and transportation plans; • Make zoning decisions regarding land use along designated freight corridors; • Provide weight in selecting cost affordable road projects that are of economic; importance to the community; and • Designate new areas for development into freight activity centers. What you need to do: • Find ways to improve access to existing freight activity centers. • Designate a Freight Advisory Committee within the MPOs to provide expertise and advocacy on freight issues. • Develop new land use policies that insulate industrial areas and their access corridors from residential encroachment. • Know what you have--Consider detailed corridor studies for each of the designated Regional Freight Mobility Corridors focusing physical and operational improvements that will make the movement of goods easier.
    [Show full text]
  • JACI$Oltvttre Dtvlsrol{
    INDEX Safety f irst _ ___ PACEq sFtcr.rl SCBEDU LE-TI \- STBUCT TONS lll:,:"-a *.F.!:,li: t-t.:,r1' i -:"j:r:sron Li-36 ll:c - r- : -..::.irvis:on {: SEABOARD lr : ::- 2t Suhirvision r3 ! r: :- -i::i:r:sion 3{ COAST LTNE L.: r : i::.::r:sion 3-3-{-5 Jt.JJ I r::. ! :5::r:sion n;i-9 3^-3;-3E l,-r-rr t ics S'.rbdirision (a 3t RAILR,OAD E,e-'ur.: SuMivision e 39 !r -r:rrrrc Subdivision 10 { l-{9 G:r r -i:5::rision tt {{-{5 fu:--r, S-:.livision tt t: I a: : !.: S'Jbdivision I?-13 {3-{{ (.:, ":r: S.;'rdivision L4 35 JACI$oltvttrEDtvlsrol{ '* l' r S::c:r'lsion r3 {6-{? Pr:7 S:lriisision l4 {;{6 Cry r:r.. P.:rer Subdivision l4 t? AilD Pr,r:rr Subdivision l{ {5 f---:r SuMivision 15 {6 Sc::-.::gSuMivision LD 39-{0 IATIPADIVISION Or*lr:::a Subdivision l5 {0 l-:, : itrlee Subdivision r5 {0 s: r D:tision: -cr-:'::i SuMivision 16-17 4?-i8-{9 -.r:.: Lr. Subdivision l8-1I {9-5G51 TfMETABLE No. 8 !-. :r--- Subdivision 20-21 5L-52 l'-- -.:.-: S.:rdivision t, - 53 I:Y EFFECT lt ' ." *. Subdivision 22 53 .ro !-.... * Subdivision il C: r: 3: S;:Jivision 22 60 Sunday, October 30, 1977 f,-' Xic- Subdivision .q ' 23 Er :; Subdivision 23 58 lr.'-,r S::.i:rision 23 61 At 12201A.M. ir. :'.:, S-:.i:vision 24 58 q/ ?r--,: :-:.:.r:-<ion Jb ST'PERSEDINGTIME TABLE NO. 7 l|-- -, :-:.1-r:sion 25 55 D.{TED APRIL 24,1977 .L':r: S::.:-v -.:on 25 54 lrr .:r.:,3r -suMivision 25 56 ],'.
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide Comprehensive Verified List
    Statewide Comprehensive Verified List OGC Water- 1998 303(d) Parameters Assessed Dissolved Concentration of Projected Year For Water- Priority for TMDL Verified Period Cycle Group Case Group Name Planning Unit County (-ies) WBID Water Segment Name body Parameters of Using the Impaired Oxygen/Biology Criterion or TMDL Comments body Type Development3 Assessment Data4 Number Class1 Concern Waters Rule (IWR) Pollutant of Concern Threshold Not Met Development3 Choctawhatchee - Little Bear Creek (South This waterbody is impaired for this parameter based on the number of 3 3 16-0477 St. Andrews Bay Bay, Calhoun 1041 Stream 1 Fecal Coliform ≤ 400 Counts / 100 mL Low 5/23 St. Andrew Fork) exceedances for the sample size and is being added to the 303(d) List. Exceeds Shellfish This waterbody is listed as impaired for this parameter because the shellfish Choctawhatchee - Fecal Coliform (SEAS Evaluation & harvesting classification is not fully approved by the Shellfish Environmental 3 3 16-0479 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061A West Bay Estuary 2 High Impaired St. Andrew Classification) Assessment Section Assessment Section (SEAS) of the Department of Agriculture and Consumer (SEAS) thresholds Services. This parameter is being added to the Verified List. ENRN4: AGM 2008 (0.33 mg/L) 2009 (0.41 mg/L) 2010 (0.34 mg/L) This waterbody is impaired for this parameter because the annual geometric Choctawhatchee - ENRN4: AGM ≤ 0.35 3 3 16-0478 St. Andrews Bay Bay 1061A West Bay Estuary 2 Nutrients (Total Nitrogen) Medium 2011 (0.31 mg/L) means exceeded the criterion more than once in the most recent consecutive St.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 18/LA GACETA/Friday, May 21, 2021
    LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT CITRUS COUNTY CITRUS COUNTY CITRUS COUNTY CITRUS COUNTY HERNANDO COUNTY CITRUS COUNTY MONTHS AFTER THE DATE OF THE Tampa, Florida 33607 In accordance with the Americans with of your receipt of your notice to appear in FIRST PUBLICATION OF THIS NOTICE. 5/21-5/28/21LG 2T Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), Disabled Court at: Hernando County Peggy Welch ALL CLAIMS NOT FILED WITHIN THE —————————————————— persons who, because of their disabilities, (352) 754-4402. TIME PERIODS SET FORTH IN FLORIDA need special accommodation to partici- DATED May 17, 2021 IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE STATUTES SECTION 733.702 WILL BE pate in this proceeding should contact the IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE /s/ Alexandra Kalman FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR FOREVER BARRED. NOTWITHSTAND- FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ADA Coordinator at 110 N. Apopka Ave. CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA ING THE TIME PERIOD SET FORTH Inverness, FL 34450, by calling 352-341- Alexandra Kalman, Esq. CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA Florida Bar No. 109137 CASE NO.: 2020 CC 000285 ABOVE, ANY CLAIM FILED TWO (2) CIVIL DIVISION 6424, seven (7) working days prior to the YEARS OR MORE AFTER THE DECE- date service is needed; if you are hearing or Lender Legal PLLC ARBOR LAKES PROPERTY OWNERS DENT’S DATE OF DEATH IS BARRED. Case No.: 2021 CA 000019 A voice impaired, call 711. 2807 Edgewater Drive ASSOCIATION, INC., Orlando, FL 32804 6JGFCVGQHſTUVRWDNKECVKQPQHVJKUPQVKEG MADISON ALAMOSA HECM, LLC, Plaintiff This notice shall be published once each Tel: (407) 730-4644 is May 21, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Csx Transportation Contract Summary
    STB-CSXT 60333 Amendment 85 CSX TRANSPORTATION AMENDED CONTRACT SUMMARY CONTRACT DATE July 18, 2013 EFFECTIVE DATE July 18, 2013 ISSUED BY E. A. TAYLOR, MANAGER-MARKETING SERVICES-J865 500 WATER STREET JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202 PHONE (904) 279-5572 Amendment 85 to Contract Summary STB-CSXT 60333 Effective July 18, 2013, this Amendment is all inclusive of the provisions and changes to the original Contract Summary and any prior Amendments. Additions, deletions and cancellations to this contract Summary can be determined by comparing this Amendment to the prior Amendments, and if none, the original Contract Summary. ITEM SUBJECT APPLICATION 1 Participating CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. Carrier(s) E. A. Taylor, Manager-Marketing Services-J865 500 Water Street Jacksonville, FL 32202 Phone (904) 279-5572 Evansville Western Railway; Massachusetts Coastal Railroad Llc; R J Corman Railroad Company/Memphis Line; U.S. Rail Corporation Llc 2 Commodity Wheat Flour Exc. Blended Or Prepared See 20451-20452; Malt Flour, Barley Or Wheat, Or Barley Or Wheat Mixed With Grain Flour; Flour Or Other Grain Mill Products, Nec; Wheat Flour; Corn Meal Or Flour Exc. Animal Or Poultry Feed See 20421-20423. 3 Shipper/ ADM MILLING CO. Identity 4 Origin Beech Grove, In; Buffalo, Ny; Chicago, Il; East St Louis, Il; Memphis, Tn; Mt Vernon, In; New Albany, In; St Louis, Mo. 5 Destination Baldwinsville, Ny; Beech Grove, In; Boston, Ma; Bowling Green, Ky; Buffalo, Ny; Cartersville, Ga; Chattanooga, Tn; Chicago, Il; Columbus, Oh; Cumberland City, Tn; Elyria, Oh; Fall River, Ma; Georgetown, Sc; Hudson Upper, Ny; Huntington, Wv; Indianapolis, In; Jackson, Oh; Jackson, Tn; Jacksonville, Fl; Louisville, Ky; Mansfield, Ma; Martel, Oh; Mt Vernon, In; Murfreesboro, Tn; New Albany, In; Newark, Nj; North Bergen, Nj; Philadelphia, Pa; Portsmouth, Va; Sidney, Oh; Waverly, Nj; Westboro, Ma; Williamsburg, Va; *Fl Jacksonville - Ag.
    [Show full text]
  • FY16-17 Pos Issued Info.Pdf
    Petroleum Restoration Program MFMP Purchase Order Issuance June 30 ‐ July 6, 2016 PO Order PO Start No. FACID PR No. PO No. PO Title Total Contract Supplier PO End Date Site Manager Phase Date Date DEP‐PETRO‐FY15/16‐138622096‐837‐005C‐RYDER TRUCK American Environmental Engineering 1 138622096 PR9557673 AF5E60 7/6/2016 RENTAL #0352A‐RAP‐SBB $6,140.00 GC837 of Florida, Inc. 7/6/2016 12/5/2016 Monica Castro (Contracts) RAP DEP‐PETRO‐FY15/16‐139807695‐860‐005A‐MIAMI 2 139807695 PR9553350 AF5A66 7/5/2016 INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT‐LSA‐JMB $56,964.96 GC860 Gannett Fleming, Inc. 7/5/2016 5/1/2017 Monica Castro (Contracts) LSA DEP‐PETRO‐FY15/16‐299401707‐733‐002B‐TOWN AND 3 299401707 PR9557103 AF5DAA 7/6/2016 COUNTRY PLAZA‐WASC‐SBB $2,084.00 GC733 Andreyev Engineering Inc 7/6/2016 1/2/2017 Sarah Newkirk (Contracts) WASC DEP‐PETRO‐FY15/16‐138735502‐837‐012B‐SUNOCO STATION‐ American Environmental Engineering 4 138735502 PR9563472 AF6016 7/6/2016 SA‐JSL $8,297.50 GC837 of Florida, Inc. 7/6/2016 2/1/2017 Roberto Rodriguez (Contracts) SA DEP‐PETRO‐FY15/16‐418624083‐746‐009A‐HARMONS 5 418624083 PR9501399 AF2E72 7/6/2016 AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CTR‐LSA‐BRD $31,734.90 GC746 Ellis & Associates, Inc. 7/6/2016 6/1/2017 Valerie Coton (Contracts) LSA DEP‐PETRO‐FY15/16‐168521548‐794‐051A‐SUNSHINE FOOD 6 168521548 PR9553637 AF5AC0 6/30/2016 MART #208‐PBC‐BAW‐AC395E $217,500.00 GC794 ATC Group Services, LLC 6/30/2016 6/14/2021 Dona Milinkovich (Contracts) PBC DEP‐PETRO‐FY15/16‐058501267‐739‐046A‐CIRCLE K #7436‐PBC‐ 7 058501267 PR9544988 AF5AAC 6/30/2016 BRD‐AC395A $150,000.00 GC739 ATC Group Services, LLC 6/30/2016 8/13/2020 Leah Smith (Contracts) PBC DEP‐PETRO‐FY15/16‐498944509‐764‐014B‐TEXACO STATION 8 498944509 PR9545056 AF548B 6/30/2016 LATT MAXCY CORP‐SA‐BAW $4,381.92 GC764 HSW Engineering, Inc.
    [Show full text]