DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Approval Order Re NEC Settlement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Approval Order Re NEC Settlement Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 1 of 58 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 IN RE: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES Case No. 13-md-02420-YGR ANTITRUST LITIGATION 12 MDL No. 2420 13 This Document Relates To: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL 14 APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT NEC 15 CORPORATION 16 Date: August 29, 2017 Time: 2:00 p.m. 17 Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers Location: Courtroom 1, 4th Floor 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT NEC CORPORATION—Case No. 13-md-02420-YGR Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 2 of 58 1 On July 24, 2017, Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Memorandum in Support 2 of Final Approval of Class Action Settlements, including with Defendant NEC Corporation 3 (“NEC”). The Court, having reviewed the motion, the settlement agreement, the pleadings and 4 other papers on file in this action, and the statements of counsel and the parties, hereby finds that 5 the motion should be GRANTED. 6 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 7 1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this litigation, and the Actions 8 within this litigation and over the parties to the settlement agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, 9 including all members of the settlement class and the Defendants. 10 2. For purposes of this Order, except as otherwise set forth herein, the Court adopts 11 and incorporates the definitions contained in the settlement agreement, to the extent not 12 contradictory or mutually exclusive. 13 3. The Court finds that Saveri & Saveri, Inc., Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP, and 14 Berman Tabacco, previously appointed as Class Counsel pursuant to Rule 23(g) of the Federal Rules 15 of Civil Procedure, has and will fairly and competently represent the interests of the settlement class. 16 4. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court certifies the 17 following settlement class only with respect to NEC: 18 All persons and entities that purchased a Lithium Ion Battery or Lithium Ion Battery Product from any Defendant, or any division, subsidiary or affiliate thereof, or any 19 co-conspirator in the United States during the Class Period, from January 1, 2000 20 through May 31, 2011. Excluded from the Class are Defendants, their parent companies, subsidiaries and affiliates, any Co-Conspirators, federal governmental 21 entities and instrumentalities of the federal government, states and their subdivisions, agencies and instrumentalities, and any judge or jurors assigned to this 22 case. 23 5. The Court further finds that the prerequisites to certifying a settlement class under 24 Rule 23 are satisfied for settlement purposes in that: (a) there are thousands of geographically 25 dispersed settlement class members, making joinder of all members impracticable; (b) there are 26 questions of law and fact common to the settlement class which predominate over individual 27 issues; (c) the claims or defenses of the settlement class plaintiffs are typical of the claims or 28 defenses of the settlement class; (d) the plaintiffs will fairly and adequately protect the interests of 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT NEC CORPORATION—Case No. 13-md-02420-YGR Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 3 of 58 1 the settlement class, and have retained counsel experienced in antitrust class action litigation who 2 have, and will continue to, adequately represent the settlement class; and (e) a settlement class 3 resolution is superior to individual settlements. 4 6. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, after a hearing, the 5 Court hereby finally approves and confirms the settlement set forth in the settlement agreement and 6 finds that said settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable and adequate to the settlement class. 7 7. This Court hereby dismisses on the merits and with prejudice the Action in favor of 8 Defendant NEC, with each party to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees, except as provided in 9 the settlement agreement. 10 8. The NEC Releasees are hereby and forever released from all Released Claims as 11 defined in the settlement agreement. 12 9. The notice given to the settlement class, including individual notice to all members 13 of the settlement class who could be identified through reasonable efforts, was the best notice 14 practicable under the circumstances. Said notice provided due and adequate notice of those 15 proceedings and of the matters set forth therein, including the proposed settlement set forth in the 16 settlement agreement, to all persons entitled to such notice, and said notice fully satisfied the 17 requirements of Rule 23, Subdivisions (c)(2) and (e)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 18 and the requirements of due process. 19 10. Those persons/entities identified in the list attached hereto as Exhibit 2 are validly 20 excluded from the settlement class. Such persons/entities are not entitled to any recovery of the 21 settlement proceeds obtained in connection with the settlement. 22 11. Any member of the settlement class who failed to timely and validly request to be 23 excluded from the settlement class shall be subject to and bound by the provisions of the 24 settlement agreement, the Released Claims contained therein, and this Judgment with respect to all 25 Released Claims, regardless of whether such members of the settlement class seek or obtain any 26 distribution from the Gross Settlement Fund or the Net Settlement Fund. 27 12. The plan of allocation set forth in the class notice is, in all respects, fair, adequate, 28 and reasonable. Accordingly, the Court hereby grants final approval of the plan of allocation. 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT NEC CORPORATION—Case No. 13-md-02420-YGR Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 4 of 58 1 13. Without affecting the finality of the Judgment in any way, this Court hereby retains 2 continuing jurisdiction over: (a) implementation of the settlement agreement and any distribution 3 to settlement class members pursuant to further orders of this Court; (b) disposition of the Gross 4 Settlement Fund; (c) hearing and determining applications by plaintiffs for attorneys’ fees, costs, 5 expenses, and interest; (d) the Actions until the Final Judgment has become effective and each and 6 every act agreed to be performed by the parties all have been performed pursuant to the settlement 7 agreement; (e) hearing and ruling on any matters relating to the plan of allocation of settlement 8 proceeds; and (f) the parties to the settlement agreement for the purpose of enforcing and 9 administering the settlement agreement and the mutual releases contemplated by, or executed in 10 connection with the settlement agreement. 11 14. In the event that the settlement does not become effective in accordance with the 12 terms of the settlement agreement, then the Judgment shall be rendered null and void and shall be 13 vacated, and in such event, all orders entered and releases delivered in connection herewith shall 14 be null and void and the parties shall be returned to their respective positions ex ante. 15 15. The Court finds, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that 16 Judgment should be entered and further finds that there is no just reason for delay in the entry of 17 Judgment as to the parties to the settlement agreement. Accordingly, the Clerk is hereby directed to 18 enter Judgment forthwith for Defendant NEC. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: _____________________September 5, 2017 ________________________________ Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers 22 United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT NEC CORPORATION—Case No. 13-md-02420-YGR Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 5 of 58 EXHIBIT 1 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 6 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 7 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 8 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 9 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 10 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 11 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 12 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 13 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 14 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 15 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 16 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 17 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 18 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 19 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 20 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 21 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 22 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 23 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 24 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 25 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 26 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 27 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 28 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 29 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 30 of 58 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 31 of 58 EXHIBIT 2 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1942 Filed 09/05/17 Page 32 of 58 In re: Lithium Ion Batteries Antitrust Litigation Report on Exclusions Received - NEC Monday August 28, 2017 No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2321 Filed 05/16/18 Page 1 of 74 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 IN RE: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES Case No. 13-md-02420-YGR ANTITRUST LITIGATION 12 MDL No. 2420 13 FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL This Document Relates To: WITH PREJUDICE AS TO LG CHEM 14 DEFENDANTS ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS 15 AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO LG CHEM DEFENDANTS— Case No. 13-md-02420-YGR Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2321 Filed 05/16/18 Page 2 of 74 1 This matter has come before the Court to determine whether there is any cause why this 2 Court should not approve the settlement between Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) and 3 Defendants LG Chem, Ltd. and LG Chem America, Inc. (together “LG Chem”), set forth in the 4 parties’ settlement agreement dated October 2, 2017, in the above-captioned litigation. The Court, 5 after carefully considering all papers filed and proceedings held herein and otherwise being fully 6 informed, has determined (1) that the settlement agreement should be approved, and (2) that there 7 is no just reason for delay of the entry of this Judgment approving the settlement agreement. 8 Accordingly, the Court directs entry of Judgment which shall constitute a final adjudication of this 9 case on the merits as to the parties to the settlement agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovate. Execute. Grow
    INNOVATE. EXECUTE. GROW. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT YEARINREVIEW.STANLEYBLACKANDDECKER.COM 01 Stanley Black & Decker is advancing global stewardship principles across our entire value chain. In 2014 we publicly shared our commitment to be economically, environmentally and socially responsible in everything that we do by unveiling ECOSMART— our company’s name for sustainability. ECOSMART emphasizes our commitment to a sustainable future and aligns with our Stanley Fulfillment System, ensuring that our products with sustainable attributes maximize their business attributes, too. In 2014, for the fourth consecutive year, we were listed on the Dow Jones Sustainability North American Index, the last two years in the IEQ Machinery and Electrical Equipment category, in recognition of our economic, environmental and social performance. We also achieved the highest attainable score on both the CDP Climate Disclosure Leadership Index and the CDP Climate Performance Leadership Index, acknowledging our ability to measure, verify, manage and reduce our energy demand and resultant carbon footprint. As we go forward, it is our aspiration to secure recognition from the Dow Jones Sustainability Index on a global level. As we build on our commitment to sustainability, we have continued with a smaller page count for this year’s Annual Report, a tradition we started in 2009. We have also transitioned to “Notice and Access” which has allowed us to reduce our print run significantly. Visit yearinreview.stanleyblackanddecker.com to view stories and pictures that bring exciting aspects of the Stanley Black & Decker story to life, to explore our financials, review our sustainable practices, and to read about our businesses, our brands and our plans for growth.
    [Show full text]
  • STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC. Form 10-K Annual Report Filed
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filing Date: 2017-02-15 | Period of Report: 2016-12-31 SEC Accession No. 0000093556-17-000006 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC. Mailing Address Business Address 1000 STANLEY DR 1000 STANLEY DR CIK:93556| IRS No.: 060548860 | State of Incorp.:CT | Fiscal Year End: 1230 NEW BRITAIN CT 06053 P O BOX 7000 Type: 10-K | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-05224 | Film No.: 17614632 NEW BRITAIN CT 06053 SIC: 3420 Cutlery, handtools & general hardware 8602255111 Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 OR ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___________ to ___________ COMMISSION FILE 1-5224 STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC. (Exact Name Of Registrant As Specified In Its Charter) Connecticut 06-0548860 (State Or Other Jurisdiction Of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation Or Organization) Identification Number) 1000 Stanley Drive New Britain, Connecticut 06053 (Address Of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) 860-225-5111 (Registrant’s Telephone Number) Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(b) Of The Act: Title Of Each Class Name Of Each Exchange On Which Registered Common Stock-$2.50 Par Value per Share New York Stock Exchange Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(g) Of The Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanley Black & Decker
    STANLEY BLACK & DECKER Investor Overview Version: 7.8.13 Cautionary Statements This presentation contains “forward looking statements,” that is, statements that address future, not past events. In this context, forward-looking statements often address our expected future business and financial performance and financial condition, and often contain words such as: “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” or “will.” Forward-looking statements by their nature address matters that are, to different degrees, uncertain. These statements are based on assumptions of future events that may not prove accurate. They are also based on our current plans and strategy and such plans and strategy could change in the future. Actual results may differ materially from those projected or implied in any forward- looking statements. Please refer to our most recent SEC filings, including our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, subsequently filed Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for detailed information regarding factors that could cause or contribute to actual results differing materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements. This presentation also contains non-GAAP financial information, including CFROI. CFROI is defined as cash flow from operations less capital and software expenditures* divided by year end capital (debt plus equity* less cash). CFROI is considered important as it is a cash based measure of value creation that ties our strategic focus to returns. Reconciliations of other non-GAAP measures are provided in our quarterly press releases announcing financial results, and may be found in the accompanying appendix.
    [Show full text]
  • Form 10-K (PDF)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___________ to ___________ COMMISSION FILE 1-5224 STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC. (Exact Name Of Registrant As Specified In Its Charter) Connecticut 06-0548860 (State Or Other Jurisdiction Of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation Or Organization) Identification Number) 1000 Stanley Drive New Britain, Connecticut 06053 (Address Of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) 860-225-5111 (Registrant’s Telephone Number) Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(b) Of The Act: Title Of Each Class Name Of Each Exchange On Which Registered Common Stock-$2.50 Par Value per Share New York Stock Exchange Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(g) Of The Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1947 Filed 09/05/17 Page 1 of 62 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 IN RE: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES Case No. 13-md-02420-YGR ANTITRUST LITIGATION 12 MDL No. 2420 13 This Document Relates To: FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 14 WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS TOSHIBA CORPORATION 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT TOSHIBA CORPORATION— Case No. 13-md-02420-YGR Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 1947 Filed 09/05/17 Page 2 of 62 1 This matter has come before the Court to determine whether there is any cause why this 2 Court should not approve the settlement between plaintiffs and Defendant Toshiba Corporation 3 (“Toshiba”), set forth in the parties’ settlement agreement dated March 15, 2017, in the above- 4 captioned litigation. The Court, after carefully considering all papers filed and proceedings held 5 herein and otherwise being fully informed, has determined (1) that the settlement agreement should 6 be approved, and (2) that there is no just reason for delay of the entry of this Final Judgment 7 approving the settlement agreement. Accordingly, the Court directs entry of Final Judgment which 8 shall constitute a final adjudication of this case on the merits as to the parties to the settlement 9 agreement. Good cause appearing therefor, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED 10 THAT: 11 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. Company Brochure
    1 STANLEY BLACK & DECKER IS THE WORLD’S LARGEST TOOLS AND STORAGE COMPANY, THE WORLD’S SECOND-LARGEST COMMERCIAL ELECTRONIC SECURITY COMPANY, AND A WORLD- LEADING PROVIDER OF ENGINEERED FASTENING SYSTEMS, WITH UNIQUE AND POWERFUL GROWTH PLATFORMS IN THE OIL & GAS AND INFRASTRUCTURE INDUSTRIES. Just as it was in 1843, our passion for excellence is seen around the world in our loyal customer relationships, disciplined operations and purposeful business growth. 2 OUR HISTORY Our Numbers When you trace it all the way back, it comes down to three individuals: § 1843: STANLEY® is Founded Frederick Stanley, Duncan Black, and Alonzo Decker. § #1 in Tools and Storage For more than 175 years, we’ve been proud to continue their legacies and proud to carry their § #2 in Commercial Electronic Security names forward. § #2 in Engineered Fastening § 52,000+ Employees in 50 Countries In 1843, Frederick Stanley started a small shop in New Britain, Connecticut to manufacture bolts, hinges, and other hardware from wrought iron. With superior quality, consistent § 500,000 Products innovation, and rigorous operational improvement, Stanley’s company defined excellence, and § 150 Million Shares Outstanding (NYSE) so did his products. § 140+ Years of Consecutive Dividend Payouts § 479 Consecutive Quarters with Dividend Records In 1910, S. Duncan Black and Alonzo G. Decker started their shop, similar in size at first, in Baltimore, Maryland. Six years later they changed the world by obtaining the world’s first patent § 47 Consecutive Years of Increased Dividends for a portable power tool, and the company they built has been changing the world ever since. § 13,000+ Registered and Active Global Patents Both companies grew in parallel over the ensuing decades, amassing an unparalleled family of brands and products and an even more impressive wealth of industry expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Marr Declaration in Support of Final Approval of LG Chem, Samsung
    Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2249-2 Filed 03/29/18 Page 1 of 130 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2249-2 Filed 03/29/18 Page 2 of 130 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2249-2 Filed 03/29/18 Page 3 of 130 Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2249-2 Filed 03/29/18 Page 4 of 130 EXHIBIT A Case 4:13-md-02420-YGR Document 2249-2 Filed 03/29/18 Page 5 of 130 In re: Lithium Ion Batteries Antitrust Litigation Report on Exclusions Received - LG Chem Wednesday, March 28, 2018 No. Entity Subsidiaries/Affiliates Postmark 1 MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC 1/11/2018 2 CONSTANCE HUBER 1/12/2018 3 MICHAEL AUGUSTINI 1/13/2018 4 MARK WATERS 1/13/2018 5 FREY AND CAMPBELL INC 1/15/2018 6 MARY JOHNSON 1/16/2018 7 KATHY LOMBARDI 1/16/2018 8 IRA BIRDSONG 1/16/2018 9 MIMI FELLNER 1/16/2018 10 NETTIE LEWIS 1/16/2018 11 GEORGE S GEIGER 1/16/2018 12 BARBARA CAMPBELL 1/17/2018 13 ROBERT WITTENBORN 1/17/2018 14 WAYNE HILCHEN 1/17/2018 15 LINDA GALLAGHER 1/17/2018 16 CHARLES WOLLASTON 1/17/2018 17 DIANA L THOMAS 1/17/2018 18 COOPER & LINK 1/18/2018 19 JERRY STARK 1/18/2018 20 CRYSTAL ATKINS 1/18/2018 21 MICHAEL FLEISCHER 1/18/2018 22 DUANE CLENDANIEL 1/19/2018 23 ANDREW BURT 1/19/2018 24 ELAINE T MACCULLOUGH 1/19/2018 25 DANIEL ADAMS 1/19/2018 26 PHYSIO-CONTROL, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsidiaries of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc
    SUBSIDIARIES OF STANLEY BLACK DECKER, INC Incorporation/ Corporate Name Organization United States 3xLogic, Inc. Delaware 3xLogic Indiana, LLC Delaware 3xLogic Florida, LLC Delaware 3‐V Fastener Co., Inc. California 8 Commerce Drive, LLC California AeroFit LLC Connecticut AeroScout (US) LLC Delaware AeroScout LLC Delaware ASIA FASTENING (US), INC. Delaware B&D Holdings, Inc. Maryland BDK FAUCET HOLDINGS INC. Delaware Bagley Road LLC Ohio BLACK & DECKER (IRELAND) INC. Delaware BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC. Maryland BLACK & DECKER DE PANAMA LLC Maryland BLACK & DECKER FUNDING CORPORATION Delaware BLACK & DECKER GROUP, LLC Delaware BLACK & DECKER HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT INC. Maryland BLACK & DECKER HOLDINGS, LLC Delaware BLACK & DECKER INC. Delaware BLACK & DECKER INDIA INC. Maryland BLACK & DECKER INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC Delaware BLACK & DECKER INVESTMENTS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED Maryland BLACK & DECKER INVESTMENTS LLC Maryland BLACK & DECKER MEXFIN LLC Delaware BLACK & DECKER PUERTO RICO INC. Delaware BLACK & DECKER SHELBYVILLE, LLC Kentucky Bristol Industires, LLC Delaware Bostitch‐Holding, L.L.C. Delaware Bulldog Barrels, LLC Pennsylvania Consolidated Areospace Manufacturing, LLC Delaware CAM International Holdings, Inc. Delaware CPE Acquisition Co. Delaware CRC‐EVANS INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LLC* Delaware CRC‐Evans International LLC* Delaware CRC‐Evans Pipeline International, Inc. Delaware CRC‐EVANS WELDING SERVICES, INC. Delaware Clarke Security Services Incorporated Illinois DEVILBISS AIR POWER COMPANY Delaware DIYZ, LLC Delaware DADO, Inc. F/K/A SBDLINQ Delaware Doncasters US Holdings Inc. Delaware March 9, 2021 1 SUBSIDIARIES OF STANLEY BLACK DECKER, INC Incorporation/ Corporate Name Organization United States The EAP Acquisition Co., LLC Delaware E.A. Patten Co., LLC Connecticut EMHART HARTTUNG INC. Delaware EMHART TEKNOLOGIES LLC Delaware Hardware City Associates Limited Partnership Connecticut I.D.L.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Annual Report
    Where We Go From Here 2011 Annual Report yearinreview.stanleyblackanddecker.com As we build on our commitment to sustainability, we have As Stanley Black & Decker continued the application of Stanley continued with a smaller page count for this year’s Annual Report, Fulfillment System (SFS) principles in 2011 the actions have a tradition we started in 2009. produced year-over-year improvements in environmental waste reduction, energy conservation and water reduction. Our global Visit www.yearinreview.stanleyblackanddecker.com to view videos manufacturing and distribution centers reported: and pictures that bring exciting aspects of the Stanley Black & Decker story to life, to explore our financials, and to read about our • 3% reduction in total waste generation, normalized businesses, our brands and our plans for growth. to production In 2011 Stanley Black & Decker was named to the North • 6% increase in amount of waste recycled, absolute American Dow Jones Sustainability Index in recognition of our • 10% reduction in paper-related waste, absolute economic, environmental and social performance. Review this • 10% reduction in energy consumption, normalized accomplishment and all our sustainability results at to production www.stanleyblackanddecker.com/company/sustainability. • 10% reduction in process water usage, normalized to production Visit yearinreview.stanleyblackanddecker.com Front Cover Left/Back Cover Right: Facom’s powerful, ergonomic tools and devices enable simpler, faster and safer work. Front Cover Center: CRC-Evans’ P625 Dual-Torch Automatic Welder produces high quality welds with high productivity in offshore projects.Front Cover Right: DEWALT 20V MAX* lithium ion cordless power tools deliver superior application speed and runtime in a lightweight, powerful package.
    [Show full text]