DOCSLIB.ORG

A Checklist of the Beetles of Cuba with Data on Distributions and Bionomics (Insecta: Coleoptera)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Checklist of the Beetles of Cuba with Data on Distributions and Bionomics (Insecta: Coleoptera) Arthropods of Florida and Neighboring Land Areas Volume 18 A Checklist of the Beetles of Cuba with Data on Distributions and Bionomics (Insecta: Coleoptera) Stewart B. Peck Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Charles H. Bronson, Commissioner Division of Plant Industry Richard Gaskalla, Director P.O. Box 147100 Gainesville, FL 32614-7100 Arthropods of Florida and Neighboring Land Areas Volume 18 A Checklist of the Beetles of Cuba with Data on Distributions and Bionomics (Insecta: Coleoptera) Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology 1125 Colonel By Drive Carleton University, Ottawa, K1S 5B6, Canada Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Charles H. Bronson, Commissioner Division of Plant Industry Richard Gaskalla, Director P.O. Box 147100 Gainesville, FL 32614-7100 Fernando de Zayas (1912-1983), Entomologist, Cuban Academy of Sciences Table of Contents Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................... Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. Summary of the history of Cuban beetle studies ........................................................................................ Construction of a checklist of Cuban beetles ............................................................................................... Summary and origins of the beetle fauna of Cuba ...................................................................................... Annotated list of the beetles (Coleoptera) of Cuba* ..................................................................................... Suborder Archostemata 4. Micromalthidae .............................................................................................................................. Suborder Adephaga 9. Rhysodidae ..................................................................................................................................... 10. Carabidae (+Cicindelinae) ............................................................................................................ 11. Gyrinidae...................................................................................................................................... 12. Haliplidae ..................................................................................................................................... 14. Noteridae ...................................................................................................................................... 17. Dytiscidae ..................................................................................................................................... Suborder Polyphaga Series Staphyliniformia Superfamily Hydrophiloidea 18. Hydrophilidae ............................................................................................................................... 21. Histeridae ..................................................................................................................................... Superfamily Staphylinoidea 22. Hydraenidae ................................................................................................................................. 23. Ptiliidae ........................................................................................................................................ 25. Leiodidae ...................................................................................................................................... 26. Scydmaenidae ............................................................................................................................... 28. Staphylinidae (+ Scaphidiinae and Pselaphinae) ......................................................................... Series Scarabaeiformia Superfamily Scarabaeoidea 31. Passalidae .................................................................................................................................... 33. Trogidae ....................................................................................................................................... 35. Geotrupidae .................................................................................................................................. 37. Ochodaeidae.................................................................................................................................. 38. Hybosoridae .................................................................................................................................. 39. Ceratocanthidae ........................................................................................................................... 41. Scarabaeidae ................................................................................................................................ Series Elateriformia Superfamily Scirtoidea 47. Scirtidae ....................................................................................................................................... Superfamily Buprestoidea 51. Buprestidae .................................................................................................................................. Superfamily Byrrhoidea 53. Elmidae ........................................................................................................................................ 54. Dryopidae ..................................................................................................................................... 55. Lutrochidae .................................................................................................................................. 56. Limnichidae ................................................................................................................................. 57. Heteroceridae ............................................................................................................................... 58. Psephenidae.................................................................................................................................. 60. Ptilodactylidae .............................................................................................................................. 61. Chelonariidae ............................................................................................................................... * Families known to be present in Cuba, numbered following the world list of beetle families in Arnett and Thomas (2000). Superfamily Elateroidea 67. Eucnemidae .................................................................................................................................. 69. Elateridae ..................................................................................................................................... 73. Lycidae ......................................................................................................................................... 76. Lampyridae .................................................................................................................................. 78. Cantharidae.................................................................................................................................. Series Bostrichiformia Superfamily Bostrichoidea 81. Nosodendridae .............................................................................................................................. 82. Dermestidae ................................................................................................................................. 83. Bostrichidae (+Lyctinae) .............................................................................................................. 84. Anobiidae (+Ptininae)................................................................................................................... Series Cucujiformia Superfamily Lymexyloidea 85. Lymexylidae ................................................................................................................................. Superfamily Cleroidea 87. Trogossitidae ................................................................................................................................ 89. Cleridae ........................................................................................................................................ 93. Melyridae (+Malachiinae) ............................................................................................................ Superfamily Cucujoidea 95. Sphindidae .................................................................................................................................... 97. Nitidulidae ................................................................................................................................... 98. Smicripidae .................................................................................................................................. 99. Monotomidae (+Rhizophaginae) ................................................................................................... 103. Silvanidae ................................................................................................................................... 104. Passandridae .............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local and Regional Influences on Arthropod Community
    LOCAL AND REGIONAL INFLUENCES ON ARTHROPOD COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND SPECIES COMPOSITION ON METROSIDEROS POLYMORPHA IN THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ZOOLOGY (ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION AND CONSERVATION BIOLOGy) AUGUST 2004 By Daniel S. Gruner Dissertation Committee: Andrew D. Taylor, Chairperson John J. Ewel David Foote Leonard H. Freed Robert A. Kinzie Daniel Blaine © Copyright 2004 by Daniel Stephen Gruner All Rights Reserved. 111 DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to all the Hawaiian arthropods who gave their lives for the advancement ofscience and conservation. IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Fellowship support was provided through the Science to Achieve Results program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and training grants from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the National Science Foundation (DGE-9355055 & DUE-9979656) to the Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology (EECB) Program of the University of Hawai'i at Manoa. I was also supported by research assistantships through the U.S. Department of Agriculture (A.D. Taylor) and the Water Resources Research Center (RA. Kay). I am grateful for scholarships from the Watson T. Yoshimoto Foundation and the ARCS Foundation, and research grants from the EECB Program, Sigma Xi, the Hawai'i Audubon Society, the David and Lucille Packard Foundation (through the Secretariat for Conservation Biology), and the NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant program (DEB-0073055). The Environmental Leadership Program provided important training, funds, and community, and I am fortunate to be involved with this network.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 2-29-2012 Preliminary checklist of the Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A. Monné Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, [email protected] Eugenio H. Nearns University of New Mexico, [email protected] Sarah C. Carbonel Carril Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Peru, [email protected] Ian P. Swift California State Collection of Arthropods, [email protected] Marcela L. Monné Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Monné, Miguel A.; Nearns, Eugenio H.; Carbonel Carril, Sarah C.; Swift, Ian P.; and Monné, Marcela L., "Preliminary checklist of the Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) of Peru" (2012). Insecta Mundi. Paper 717. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/717 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0213 Preliminary checklist of the Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A. Monné Museu Nacional Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Quinta da Boa Vista São Cristóvão, 20940-040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Eugenio H. Nearns Department of Biology Museum of Southwestern Biology University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA Sarah C. Carbonel Carril Departamento de Entomología Museo de Historia Natural Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos Avenida Arenales 1256, Lima, Peru Ian P.
    [Show full text]
  • Longhorn Beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) Christian Cocquempot, Ake Lindelöw
    Longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) Christian Cocquempot, Ake Lindelöw To cite this version: Christian Cocquempot, Ake Lindelöw. Longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Alien terrestrial arthropods of Europe, 4 (1), Pensoft Publishers, 2010, BioRisk, 978-954-642-554-6. 10.3897/biorisk.4.56. hal-02823535 HAL Id: hal-02823535 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02823535 Submitted on 6 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A peer-reviewed open-access journal BioRisk 4(1): 193–218 (2010)Longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Chapter 8.1 193 doi: 10.3897/biorisk.4.56 RESEARCH ARTICLE BioRisk www.pensoftonline.net/biorisk Longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) Chapter 8.1 Christian Cocquempot1, Åke Lindelöw2 1 INRA UMR Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations, CBGP, (INRA/IRD/CIRAD/Montpellier SupAgro), Campus international de Baillarguet, CS 30016, 34988 Montférrier-sur-Lez, France 2 Swedish university of agricultural sciences, Department of ecology. P.O. Box 7044, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden Corresponding authors: Christian Cocquempot ([email protected]), Åke Lindelöw (Ake.Linde- [email protected]) Academic editor: David Roy | Received 28 December 2009 | Accepted 21 May 2010 | Published 6 July 2010 Citation: Cocquempot C, Lindelöw Å (2010) Longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Plantas Hospedadoras De Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) En El Noreste De Argentina
    Rev. Bio!. Trop., 44(3)145(1): 167-175, 1996-1997 Plantas hospedadoras de Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) en el noreste de Argentina Oscar E. Gonzalez' y Osvaldo R. Di Iori02 1 Museo Regional Municipal Sudoeste Chaqueño, (3730) Charata, Chaco, Argentina. Entomología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, (1428) Ciudad Universitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mai!: Dü[email protected] (Ree. 4-1-1996. Rev. 24-IV-1996. Acep. 8-VIII-1996) Abstraet: New host p1ants and loealities are recorded for 84 species of Cerambycidae of Chaco Province (Chaquenian Dominion) and Paranaense Province (Amazonian Dominion) in northeastem Argentina and Brazil. Host p1ants belong to Anacardiaceae, Asc1epiadaceae, Apocynaceae, Bignoniaceae, Bombacaceae, Cactaceae, Caesalpinaceae, Capparidaceae, Casuarinaceae, Fabaceae, Mimosaceae, Moraceae, Nyctaginaceae, Polygonaceae, Rhamnaceae, Rutaceae, Sapindaceae, Sapotaceae and Ulmaceae.First records for Argentinaand host plants: Compsocerus barbicor­ nis Serville 1834, Desmiphora lenkoi (Lane 1959), Neocompsa serrana (Martins 1962) and Trachysomus dromedarius (Voet 1778). Fírst host plants records of rare or uncornrnon Argentine specíes of Cerambycidae are Methia tubuliven­ tris GounelIe 1913, Paraleptidea femorata GounelIe1913 and Oncideres pepotinga Martíns 1981. Key words: Cerambycidae, host plants, north-eastem Argentina. La presente contribución continúa con la in­ Cuando una localidad se visitó en más de vestigación de plantas hospedadoras de Ce­ una oportunidad, se agrega al lado del nombre rambycidae del noreste de Argentina (Di lorio el año correspondiente al de recolección de la 1994 a): se presentan nuevos registros de loca­ planta de donde emergieron los ejemplares lidades, plantas hospedadoras y correcciones a mencionados; en el caso de plantas taladas más dicha publicación. de una vez, la fecha también se incluye entre paréntesis luego de la abreviatura relativa a la planta.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae) with Description of a Species with Non‑Retractile Parameres
    ARTICLE Two new genera of Desmiphorini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Lamiinae) with description of a species with non‑retractile parameres Francisco Eriberto de Lima Nascimento¹² & Antonio Santos-Silva¹³ ¹ Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Museu de Zoologia (MZUSP). São Paulo, SP, Brasil. ² ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5047-8921. E-mail: [email protected] ³ ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7128-1418. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. In this study, two new genera of Desmiphorini (Lamiinae) are proposed: Cleidaria gen. nov., to include Cleidaria cleidae sp. nov. from the state of Chiapas in Mexico, and Obscenoides gen. nov. for Desmiphora (D.) compta Martins & Galileo, 2005. The shape of tarsal claws of Cleidaria cleidae sp. nov. (abruptly narrowed from basal half) is so far, not found in any current genera of the tribe. With respect to Obscenoides compta (Martins & Galileo, 2005) comb. nov., the genitalia of males have an unusual shape with non-retractile parameres. The character combination related to this genital structure is unknown to us in other species in the family, and hypotheses about its function are suggested. Key-Words. Genital morphology; Longhorned beetles; New taxa; Taxonomy. INTRODUCTION the current definitions of some tribes, especially based on the works of Breuning do not take into Lamiinae (Cerambycidae), also known as flat- account adaptive convergences and use superfi- faced longhorns, with more than 21,000 described cial characters to subordinate taxa. species in about 3,000 genera and 87 tribes is Among these tribes, Desmiphorini Thomson, the largest subfamily of Cerambycidae occurring 1860 is not an exception, and its “boundaries” are worldwide (Tavakilian & Chevillotte, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Ethanol and (–)-A-Pinene: Attractant Kairomones for Some Large Wood-Boring Beetles in Southeastern USA
    J Chem Ecol (2006) DOI 10.1007/s10886-006-9037-8 Ethanol and (–)-a-Pinene: Attractant Kairomones for Some Large Wood-Boring Beetles in Southeastern USA Daniel R. Miller Received: 12 September 2005 /Revised: 12 December 2005 /Accepted: 2 January 2006 # Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006 Abstract Ethanol and a-pinene were tested as attractants for large wood-boring pine beetles in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina in 2002–2004. Multiple-funnel traps baited with (j)-a-pinene (released at about 2 g/d at 25–28-C) were attractive to the following Cerambycidae: Acanthocinus nodosus, A. obsoletus, Arhopalus rusticus nubilus, Asemum striatum, Monochamus titillator, Prionus pocularis, Xylotrechus integer, and X. sagittatus sagittatus. Buprestis lineata (Buprestidae), Alaus myops (Elateridae), and Hylobius pales and Pachylobius picivorus (Curculionidae) were also attracted to traps baited with (j)-a-pinene. In many locations, ethanol synergized attraction of the cerambycids Acanthocinus nodosus, A. obsoletus, Arhopalus r. nubilus, Monochamus titillator, and Xylotrechus s. sagittatus (but not Asemum striatum, Prionus pocularis,orXylotrechus integer)to traps baited with (j)-a-pinene. Similarly, attraction of Alaus myops, Hylobius pales, and Pachylobius picivorus (but not Buprestis lineata) to traps baited with (j)-a- pinene was synergized by ethanol. These results provide support for the use of traps baited with ethanol and (j)-a-pinene to detect and monitor common large wood- boring beetles from the southeastern region of the USA at ports-of-entry in other countries, as well as forested areas in the USA. Keywords Cerambycidae . Xylotrechus . Monochamus . Acanthocinus Curculionidae . Hylobius . Pachylobius . Elateridae . Alaus . Ethanol a-Pinene .
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnoentomological and Distributional Notes on Cerambycidae and Other Coleoptera of Guerrero and Puebla,Mexico
    The Coleopterists Bulletin, 71(2): 301–314. 2017. ETHNOENTOMOLOGICAL AND DISTRIBUTIONAL NOTES ON CERAMBYCIDAE AND OTHER COLEOPTERA OF GUERRERO AND PUEBLA,MEXICO JONATHAN D. AMITH Research Affiliate, Department of Anthropology, Gettysburg College, Campus Box 2895, Gettysburg, PA 17325, U.S.A. and Research Associate, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, U.S.A. AND STEVEN W. LINGAFELTER Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Agriculture Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution,Washington, DC 20013-7012, U.S.A. Current address: 8920 South Bryerly Ct., Hereford, AZ 85615, U.S.A. ABSTRACT This article presents both ethnoentomological notes on Nahuatl and Mixtec language terms as they are applied to Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) and distributional records for species collected during three projects carried out in the states of Guerrero and Puebla, Mexico. Some comparative data from other Mesoamerican and Native American languages are discussed. Indigenous common names are mapped onto current taxonomic nomenclature, and an analysis is offered of the logical basis for Indigenous classification: the exclusion of some cerambycids and the inclusion of other beetles in the nominal native “cerambycid” category. New state distributional records for the Cerambycidae collected in this study are offered for Guerrero: Bebelis picta Pascoe, Callipogon senex Dupont, Neocompsa macrotricha Martins, Olenosus ser- rimanus Bates, Ornithia mexicana zapotensis Tippmann, Stenygra histrio Audinet-Serville, Strongylaspis championi Bates, Lissonotus flavocinctus puncticollis Bates, and Nothopleurus lobigenis Bates; and Puebla: Juiaparus mexicanus (Thomson), Ptychodes guttulatus Dillon and Dillon, and Steirastoma senex White. Key Words: linguistics, etymology, Nahuatl, Mixtec, longhorned beetle, wood-borer DOI.org/10.1649/0010-065X-71.2.301 The present article emerges from two language shapes.
    [Show full text]
  • THE IMMATURE STAGES of Eurymerus Eburioides AUDINET-SERVILLE, 1833 (COLEOPTERA: CERAMBYCIDAE: ECTENESSINI)
    IMMATURE STAGES OF Eurymerus eburioides AUDINET-SERVILLE, 1833 97 THE IMMATURE STAGES OF Eurymerus eburioides AUDINET-SERVILLE, 1833 (COLEOPTERA: CERAMBYCIDAE: ECTENESSINI) MORELLI, E.,1 SANCHEZ, A.2 and BIANCHI, M.2 1Sección Entomología, Facultad de Ciencias, Iguá, 4225, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay 2Protección Forestal, Facultad de Agronomía, Avda. Garzón, 780, Montevideo 12900, Uruguay Correspondence to: Enrique Morelli, Sección Entomología, Facultad de Ciencias, Iguá, 4225, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay, e-mail: [email protected] Received October 28, 2003 – Accepted July 16, 2004 – Distributed February 28, 2005 (With 13 figures) ABSTRACT Last instar larva and pupa of Eurymerus eburioides Audinet-Serville, 1833, are described and illus- trated based on specimens reared from neonate larvae on Eucalyptus globulus globulus logs in the laboratory. Characters of possible diagnostic value are presented in this work. Key words: Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Eurymerus, larva, pupa. RESUMO Estágios imaturos de Eurymerus eburioides Audinet-serville, 1833 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Ectenessini) Neste trabalho são descritas a larva do último instar e a pupa de Eurymerus eburioides Audinet-Serville, 1833, com base em espécimes criados em laboratório a partir de larvas neonatas de Eucalyptus globulus globulus. Apresentam-se, também, características com possível valor diagnóstico. Palavras-chave: Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Eurymerus, larva, pupa. INTRODUCTION MATERIAL AND METHODS Eurymerus eburioides Audinet-Serville is a E. eburioides beetles were reared in the labo- native cerambicid often found attacking Eucalipt in ratory on one of their hosts (Eucalyptus globulus South America (Bosq, 1934; Costa, 1943; Hayward, globulus). Neonate larvae were manually transferred 1960; Bienzanko & Bosq, 1956; Berti Filho, 1985; to logs kept in a controlled-environment chamber Moraes & Berti-Filho, 1974; Monné et al., 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Lags and Overlap in the Diversification of Weevils and Flowering Plants
    Temporal lags and overlap in the diversification of weevils and flowering plants Duane D. McKennaa,1, Andrea S. Sequeirab, Adriana E. Marvaldic, and Brian D. Farrella aDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; bDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481; and cInstituto Argentino de Investigaciones de Zonas Aridas, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Te´cnicas, C.C. 507, 5500 Mendoza, Argentina Edited by May R. Berenbaum, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved March 3, 2009 (received for review October 22, 2008) The extraordinary diversity of herbivorous beetles is usually at- tributed to coevolution with angiosperms. However, the degree and nature of contemporaneity in beetle and angiosperm diversi- fication remain unclear. Here we present a large-scale molecular phylogeny for weevils (herbivorous beetles in the superfamily Curculionoidea), one of the most diverse lineages of insects, based on Ϸ8 kilobases of DNA sequence data from a worldwide sample including all families and subfamilies. Estimated divergence times derived from the combined molecular and fossil data indicate diversification into most families occurred on gymnosperms in the Jurassic, beginning Ϸ166 Ma. Subsequent colonization of early crown-group angiosperms occurred during the Early Cretaceous, but this alone evidently did not lead to an immediate and ma- jor diversification event in weevils. Comparative trends in weevil diversification and angiosperm dominance reveal that massive EVOLUTION diversification began in the mid-Cretaceous (ca. 112.0 to 93.5 Ma), when angiosperms first rose to widespread floristic dominance. These and other evidence suggest a deep and complex history of coevolution between weevils and angiosperms, including codiver- sification, resource tracking, and sequential evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Weevils) of the George Washington Memorial Parkway, Virginia
    September 2020 The Maryland Entomologist Volume 7, Number 4 The Maryland Entomologist 7(4):43–62 The Curculionoidea (Weevils) of the George Washington Memorial Parkway, Virginia Brent W. Steury1*, Robert S. Anderson2, and Arthur V. Evans3 1U.S. National Park Service, 700 George Washington Memorial Parkway, Turkey Run Park Headquarters, McLean, Virginia 22101; [email protected] *Corresponding author 2The Beaty Centre for Species Discovery, Research and Collection Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, ON. K1P 6P4, CANADA;[email protected] 3Department of Recent Invertebrates, Virginia Museum of Natural History, 21 Starling Avenue, Martinsville, Virginia 24112; [email protected] ABSTRACT: One-hundred thirty-five taxa (130 identified to species), in at least 97 genera, of weevils (superfamily Curculionoidea) were documented during a 21-year field survey (1998–2018) of the George Washington Memorial Parkway national park site that spans parts of Fairfax and Arlington Counties in Virginia. Twenty-three species documented from the parkway are first records for the state. Of the nine capture methods used during the survey, Malaise traps were the most successful. Periods of adult activity, based on dates of capture, are given for each species. Relative abundance is noted for each species based on the number of captures. Sixteen species adventive to North America are documented from the parkway, including three species documented for the first time in the state. Range extensions are documented for two species. Images of five species new to Virginia are provided. Keywords: beetles, biodiversity, Malaise traps, national parks, new state records, Potomac Gorge. INTRODUCTION This study provides a preliminary list of the weevils of the superfamily Curculionoidea within the George Washington Memorial Parkway (GWMP) national park site in northern Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Name Here
    RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DEAD WOOD AND ARTHROPODS IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES by MICHAEL DARRAGH ULYSHEN (Under the Direction of James L. Hanula) ABSTRACT The importance of dead wood to maintaining forest diversity is now widely recognized. However, the habitat associations and sensitivities of many species associated with dead wood remain unknown, making it difficult to develop conservation plans for managed forests. The purpose of this research, conducted on the upper coastal plain of South Carolina, was to better understand the relationships between dead wood and arthropods in the southeastern United States. In a comparison of forest types, more beetle species emerged from logs collected in upland pine-dominated stands than in bottomland hardwood forests. This difference was most pronounced for Quercus nigra L., a species of tree uncommon in upland forests. In a comparison of wood postures, more beetle species emerged from logs than from snags, but a number of species appear to be dependent on snags including several canopy specialists. In a study of saproxylic beetle succession, species richness peaked within the first year of death and declined steadily thereafter. However, a number of species appear to be dependent on highly decayed logs, underscoring the importance of protecting wood at all stages of decay. In a study comparing litter-dwelling arthropod abundance at different distances from dead wood, arthropods were more abundant near dead wood than away from it. In another study, ground- dwelling arthropods and saproxylic beetles were little affected by large-scale manipulations of dead wood in upland pine-dominated forests, possibly due to the suitability of the forests surrounding the plots.
    [Show full text]