State Vs. Ravi Kumar FIR No.264/20 PS. Mayur Vihar Phase-1 U/s: 308/341/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br./East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Raj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for complainant Sh. Dinesh. Sh. Naveen Singla, Ld. Counsel for applicant/ accused Sh. Ravi Kumar. Reply to the anticipatory bail application filed by the IO/ASI Mahender Pal, PS Mayur Vihar. Heard arguments and perused record. It is stated that these are cross FIRs wherein both the sides have settled the matter and co-accused Sh. Sachin, Sh. Sonu and Smt. Mohini have already been granted regular/anticipatory bail on 29.05.2020. Keeping in view the overall circumstances of the case, applicant/accused Sh. Ravi Kumar is allowed anticipatory bail on furnishing of P/Bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of IO/SHO. The application stands disposed of. Copy of order be given dasti.

( Sanatan P;asad ) 5"-MC-- k-___,...._ Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/KKD/Delhi / 05.06.2020 State Vs. Monu FIR No. 227/20 PS. Krishna Nagar U/s 392/394/397/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Roshan Lal, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused, requested telephonically for adjourning the matter on the grounds that he could not come to the Court, as he is stuck up in his village. At request, put up on 08.06.2020 for further consideration, in the matter. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05 06.2020. State Vs. Vipin Kumar FIR No. 440/18 PS. New Ashok Nagar U/s 308/323/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Ms. Rashmi, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. IO/ASI Arvind Kumar in person. Reply is filed in respect of accused Vipin Kumar, in FIR No.440/18, U/s 308/34 IPC, PS. New Ashok Nagar, Delhi. Ld. counsel states that she has already filed an application for correction of the name of the accused, which was inadvertently mentioned in the order, dated 30.05.2020, as 'Ripon Roy', instead of 'Vipin'. Ld. counsel wants to withdraw the present application with liberty to move fresh application for interim bail. Heard. Correction is allowed and liberty is granted. Applications stand disposed off and be consigned to record room. Order be given dasti. e---- , ---es- ,-----?,--„,--- ( anatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Rajesh Kumar @ Master Ji @ Rajesh Kumar Rawat FIR No. 2288/2014 PS. Shakarpur U/s 302/120-B/34 IPC r/w Section 25/54/59 Arms Act 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Ravi Kaushal, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. This is an application U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of interim bail for a period of 45 days under the circumstances of Covid- 19 pandemic. The accused is stated to be in J/C since 13.02.2015. It appears that reply to the bail application has been filed by SI Rahul Kumar, PS Laxmi Nagar, (Old PS Shakarpur, Delhi), and no previous involvement of the present accused is mentioned therein. However, the good conduct report and also verification report with respect to judicial custody of the accused has to be obtained from Superintendent Jail concerned. Let the report from Superintendent Jail concerned in respect of good conduct and also verification report in respect of judicial custody of accused Rajesh Kumar @ Master Ji @ Rajesh Kumar Rawat be called for, for further consideration, on

08.06.2020. IO shall also be present in person and shall submit the report regarding previous involvement of applicant/accused, as obtained electronically from SCRB. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Chander Prakash FIR No. 80/20 PS. New Ashok Nagar U/s 498-A/406/34 IPC

05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judi. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Dhananj ay Kumar, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. A reply has been filed by the Naib Court Sh. Prabhat. Perused. Ld. APP states that the presence of the IO/PSI Ms. Sita is necessary to explain the requirement of custodial interrogation. Ld. counsel states that articles belonging to the complainant has already been returned to her, however, if any article is remaining, the applicant/accused is ready to return the same to the complainant. On request, put up on 12.06.2020 for presence of IO/SHO. Notice be issued to 10, in the meantime, to be present in person. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Nasirullah Khan @ Zumman FIR No. 271/16 PS. Pandav Nagar U/s 302/307/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04. 2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. None for applicant/accused despite repeated calls at 11.05 AM. Inspector D.K.Tyagi, on behalf of IO/SI Neeraj has filed reply to the bail application. Put up on 09.06.2020 for further consideration, in the matter. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020.

State Vs. Ajay Kumar FIR No. 202/17 PS. EOW U/s 420/409/406/120-B IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judi. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Gaurav Adhlakha, proxy for Sh. Rajesh Anand, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. Perused report from Superintendent, Central Jail No.11, Mandoli, Delhi. Ld. counsel for applicant is not available, despite awaiting till 11.00 AM and earlier he has requested for taking up his matter at 10.30 AM. Sh. Adhlakha, states that the main counsel Sh. Rajesh Anand comes from Noida and he is on the way. Put up on 08.06.2020 for further consideration, in the matter. IO concerned shall be present in person. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020.

At this stage, Sh. Rajesh Anand, ld. counsel for applicant/accused appears at 11.15 AM'and he is apprised of the order passed today, also NDOH. ( anatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Ajay Kumar FIR No. 201/16 PS. EOW U/s 420/409/406/120-B IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Gaurav Adhlakha, proxy for Sh. Rajesh Anand, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. Sh. Gaurav Dalal, Ld. Counsel for complainant. Ld. counsel for applicant is not available, despite awaiting till 11.00 AM and earlier he has requested for taking up his matter at 10.30 AM. Sh. Adhlakha, states that the main counsel Sh. Rajesh Anand comes from Noida and he is on the way. Put up on 08.06.2020 for further consideration, in the matter. 10 concerned shall be present in person. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020.

At this stage, Sh. Rajesh Anand, ld. counsel for applicant/accused appears at 11.15 AM and he is apprised of the order passed today, also NDOH. ( anatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Dinesh Kumar Dhaniwal FIR No. 2/2020 PS. Yamuna Depot Metro U/s 408/420/468/471/120-B IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Ajay Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for applicant/ accused. Reply to the anticipatory bail application, moved U/s 438 Cr.P.C., has been filed. IO/ASI Virender Singh is not present in the Court at 3.45 PM to explain requirement of custodial interrogation. Let IO/SHO be called for, for further hearing, in the matter, on 11.06.2020, at request of Sh. Chaudhary. Order be given dasti.

( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Vimla Devi FIR No. 2/2020 PS. Yamuna Depot Metro U/s 408/420/468/471/120-B IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Ajay Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for applicant/ accused. Reply to the anticipatory bail application, moved U/s 438 Cr.P.C., has been filed. IO/ASI Virender Singh is not present in the Court at 3.45 PM to explain requirement of custodial interrogation. Let IO/SHO be called for, for further hearing, in the matter, on 11.06.2020, at request of Sh. Chaudhary. Order be given dasti.

( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Amit Kumar FIR No.264/20 PS. Mayur Vihar Phase-1 U/s: 308/341/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judi. Br./East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Raj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for complainant Sh. Dinesh. Sh. Naveen Singla, Ld. Counsel for applicant/ accused Sh. Amit Kumar. Reply to the anticipatory bail application filed by the IO/ASI Mahender Pal, PS Mayur Vihar. Heard arguments and perused record. It is stated that these are cross FIRs wherein both the sides have settled the matter and co-accused Sh. Sachin, Sh. Sonu and Smt. Mohini have already been granted regular/anticipatory bail on 29.05.2020. Keeping in view the overall circumstances of the case, applicant/accused Sh. Amit Kumar is allowed anticipatory bail on furnishing of P/Bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of IO/SHO. The application stands disposed of. Copy of order be given dasti.

( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/KKD/Delhi / 05.06.2020 State Vs. Sumit Kumar FIR No.264/20 PS. Mayur Vihar Phase-1 U/s: 308/341/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br./East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Raj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for complainant Sh. Dinesh. Sh. Naveen Singla, Ld. Counsel for applicant/ accused Sh. Sumit Kumar. Reply to the anticipatory bail application filed by the IO/ASI Mahender Pal, PS Mayur Vihar. Heard arguments and perused record. It is stated that these are cross FIRs wherein both the sides have settled the matter and co-accused Sh. Sachin, Sh. Sonu and Smt. Mohini have already been granted regular/anticipatory bail on 29.05.2020. Keeping in view the overall circumstances of the case, applicant/accused Sh. Sumit Kumar is allowed anticipatory bail on furnishing of P/Bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of IO/SHO. The application stands disposed of. Copy of order be given dasti.

( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/KKD/Delhi / 05.06.2020 State Vs. Pawan FIR No. 263/2020 PS. Mayur Vihar U/s: 308/341/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br./East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Naveen Singla, Ld. Counsel for Complainant. Sh. Raj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused Sh. Pawan. Reply to the bail application filed by the IO/ASI Mahender Pal, PS Mayur Vihar. Heard arguments and perused record. It is stated that these are cross FIRs wherein both the sides have settled the matter and co-accused Sh. Dinesh and Smt. Shakuntala have already been granted regular/anticipatory bail on 29.05.2020. Keeping in view the overall circumstances of the case, applicant/accused Sh. Pawan is admitted to regular bail on furnishing of P/Bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Court concerned/Ld. MM/Ld. Link MM/Ld. Duty MM. The application stands disposed of. Copy of order be given dasti.

( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/KKD/Delhi / 05.06.2020 State Vs. Dheeraj Kumar FIR No. 263/2020 PS. Mayur Vihar U/s: 308/341/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br./East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Naveen Singla, Ld. Counsel for Complainant. Sh. Raj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused Sh. Dheeraj Kumar. Reply to the bail application filed by the IO/ASI Mahender Pal, PS Mayur Vihar. Heard arguments and perused record. It is stated that these are cross FIRs wherein both the sides have settled the matter and co-accused Sh. Dinesh and Smt. Shakuntala have already been granted regular/anticipatory bail vide order dated 29.05.2020. Keeping in view the overall circumstances of the case, applicant/accused Sh. Dheeraj Kumar is allowed anticipatory bail in the event of arrest, on furnishing of P/Bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of IO/SHO. The application stands disposed of. Copy of order be given dasti.

J( ( sanatan Prasac Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/KKD/Delhi / 05.06.2020 State Vs. Anwar Qureshi FIR No. 426/2017 PS. Krishna Nagar U/s 302/120-B/34 IPC & Section 25/27 Arms Act 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Prakash Priyadarshi, Ld. Counsel for applicant/ accused. Inspector Santosh Pabri, states that he has already filed reply to the interim bail application. His further submission is that there is previous involvement of the accused in FIR No.74/2012, PS Krishna Nagar, U/s 135 Electricity Act, as well as, FIR No.309/2015, PS Civil Lines, Delhi, U/s 279 IPC. Ld. counsel for applicant/accused Sh. Priyadarshi states that he would argue on the question of previous involvement, as he has NOC from the concerned department and even, there has been a settlement, in respect of the offence U/s 279 IPC, PS Civil Lines, Delhi. It appears that despite order, dated 01.06.2020, reports with respect to good conduct of applicant/accused Sh. Anwar Qureshi, is not being submitted by the Superintendent Jail concerned. Report be called for immediately, for further consideration, on 08.06.2020. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Raj @ Goli FIR No. 1331/18 PS. Shakarpur U/s 392/397/411/120-B/34 IPC & 25 Arms Act 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Dheeraj Maheshwari, Ld. Counsel for applicant /accused. It appears that reply to the bail application has already been filed on behalf of Inspector Ashok Kumar, PS Laxmi Nagar, (Old PS Shakarpur, Delhi). This is an application for grant of interim bail on the imperative of latest guidelines, issued by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India as well as H.P.C., Hon'ble High Court of Delhi. The accused is stated to be in J/C since 17.04.2018, therefore, report with regard to good conduct of the accused from the Superintendent Jail concerned, also his previous involvement and even the period of his judicial custody has to be verified. Let the IO submit report regarding previous involvement of the applicant/accused and Superintendent Jail concerned shall submit the report regarding good conduct and further verification report with respect to the period of his judicial custody, for further consideration, on 08.06.2020. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasa Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Raja Sood FIR No. 694/2013 PS. Kalyanpuri U/s: 302/201/506 IPC & 25, 27 Arms Act 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br./East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Nitin Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused Raja Sood. This is bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on account of the imperatives of latest guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court/HPC of the Hon'ble High Court dated 18.05.2020 and report regarding good conduct of the accused has been received. As per copy of report dated 02.06.2020, good conduct of the applicant/accused has been found satisfactory. Let the report regarding previous involvement of the accused, also reply to the application be called from IO/SHO concerned, also original report of good conduct of the applicant/accused be called from Jail Superintendent for further consideration in the matter on 06.06.2020. I0 shall also be present.

( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/KKD/Delhi / 05.06.2020 State Vs. Lokesh FIR No. 839/15 PS. Krishna Nagar U/s 302/396 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Inspector Santosh Kumar is present in person. Sh. Vinay Dhaka, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused, requested telephonically that he could not come to the Court today, as is suffering from fever. His further submission was that previous involvement report of the applicant/accused, also his good conduct report from jail concerned and reply to be interim bail application be called for. This is an application for grant of interim bail, moved U/s 439 Cr.P.C., on behalf of accused Lokesh. Let notice thereof be issued to IO/SHO to file reply to the bail application. The IO shall submit report regarding previous involvement of the applicant/accused and Superintendent Jail concerned shall submit the report regarding his good conduct and further verification report with respect to the period of his judicial custody, for further consideration, on 09.06.2020. IO shall also be present. Copy of the interim bail application be also given to Ld. APP for State. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Lalit @ Sunny FIR No. 195/20 PS. Kalyan Puri U/s 392/397/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. R.P.Singh, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. Reply to the bail application is filed. At request of Sh. Singh, put up on 12.06.2020 for consideration, in the matter. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Rakesh FIR No. 245/2020 PS. Kalyanpuri U/s 308/323/306/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. S.K.Gupta, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. IO/ASI Sushil Kumar is present in person. Complainants Ms. Sanjana, Ms. Geeta and Master Shivam are also present. Reply to the anticipatory bail application is filed by ASI Sushil Kumar and MLC is also shown. It appears that injuries allegedly inflicted by the accused Rakesh & Others are under observation. IO seeks time to take final medical opinion, for further consideration, on 09.06.2020. IO shall also be present in person. Order be given dasti. ti ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. 1 State Vs. Ghanshyam FIR No. 313/13 PS. Mandawali U/s: 302/201/120B/34 IPC

05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judi. Br./East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Mukesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused Ghanshyam. IO/SI Santosh Kumar states that report has already been filed. Sh. Sharma files copy of order dated 27.05.2020 passed by the court of Sh. Kuldeep Narayan, Ld. ASJ-04, East District, KKD Courts, Delhi. This is an application for grant of interim bail on the imperatives of latest guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court/HPC of the Hon'ble High Court dated 18.05.2020. From perusal of report dated 01.06.2020 of Superintendent Central Jail No. 12, Mandoli, Delhi, it appears that accused was previously involved in FIR No. 45/2012, U/s 324/34 IPC, PS Mandawali but was acquitted on 11.05.2017 and his conducted in jail is satisfactory. Accused is stated to be in J.C. since 25.05.2013. Hence, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of emergent situation of 2 State Vs. Ghanshyam FIR No. 313/13 PS. Mandawali U/s: 302/201/120B/34 IPC COVID-19 pandemic, the applicant/accused Ghanshyam is allowed interim bail for a period of 45 days from the date of his release on furnishing of P/Bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- to the satisfaction of Superintendent Jail concerned and he will surrender accordingly before the jail authorities on expiry of 45 days from date of his release and he shall not indulge in any activity prejudicial to the fair trial of the case. Copy of order be sent to Superintendent Jail through e-mail also. The application stands disposed of. The application consigned to Record Room.

( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/KKD/Delhi / 05.06.2020 1 State Vs. Karan Verma FIR No. 486/2013 PS. Mandawali U/s: 302/201/34 IPC

05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3 125/Judl. Br./East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Usman Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel with victim Ms. Sarita W/o deceased Sh. Yogesh Chaudhary. SI Santosh Kumar is present. None is present on behalf of applicant/accused despite repeated calls at 01:45 p.m. Reply to the interim application alongwith previous involvement report is filed by SI Santosh Kumar, PS Mandawali. Put up on 11.06.2020 for further consideration in the matter. ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (1ast)/KKD/Delhi / 05.06.2020

At this stage, Sh. Mohit Bhardwaj, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused appears and he draws my attention towards order dated 15.05.2020 passed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi thereby granting interim bail to the applicant/accused Sh. Karan 2 State Vs. Karan Verma FIR No. 486/2013 PS. Mandawali U/s: 302/201/34 IPC Verma for a period of three weeks from the date of release i.e. 17.05.2020 and same expires on 1)6.06.2020. The present application is being pressed on the ground of imperatives of latest guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court/HPC of the Hon'ble High Court dated 18.05.2020 and on another medical ground of operation of his maternal grand-mother of applicant/accused as there is no one else applicant/accused to take care of maternal grand-mother of the accused which is scheduled For 12.06.2020. Reply to the interim bail application has also been filed. It appears that as per the report submitted by the IO, there is previous involvement of accused in FIR NO. 370/2011, U/S 365/323/34 IPC, l'S Laxmi Nagar, also FIR NO. 941/2011. U/S 382/34, PS Shakarpur. Ld. Counsel Sh. Mohit

Bhardwaj submits that accused has already been acquitted in both cases. Keeping in view the overall facts and circumstances of the case and further the fact teat accused has already availed the benefit of interim bail in the matter and surgery has to be performed on 12.06.2020, I do not find any ground to grant extension of interim bail to the 'applicant/accused Karan State Vs. Karan Verma FIR No. 486/2013 PS. Mandawali U/s: 302/201/34 IPC

Verma. The application stands rejected. The application be consigned to Record Room.

( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/K KD/Delhi / 05.06.2020 State Vs. Amit Singh Chauhan FIR No. 2735/2015 PS. Shakarpur U/s 302/34 IPC

05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned.

Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. None for applicant/accused despite repeated calls till 12.10

PM. It appears that reply to the interim bail application has already been filed on behalf of SI Rahul Kumar, PS Laxmi Nagar, (old PS Shakarpur,

Delhi). Ld. counsel for applicant/accused Sh. Ankit Mutreja has

contacted Sh. Rakesh Verma, P.A. to the Court and his submission is that the application is covered by the imperative of latest guidelines, issued by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India as well as H.P.C., at Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and his request was that page No.20 of the application can be looked into in this regard, where the relevant portion of the guidelines, have been annexed and his further submission was that accused is handicap to the extent of 90% and is stated to be in J/C since 27.11.2015, therefore, report with regard to good

conduct of the accused from the Superintendent Jail concerned, also report

regarding his previous involvement and even the period of his judicial custody has to be verified. Let the IO submit report regarding previous involvement of

the applicant/accused and Superintendent Jail concerned shall submit the report regarding good conduct and further verification report with respect to

the period of his judicial custody, for further consideration, on 09.06.2020.

Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Pawan FIR No. 545/2018 PS. New Ashok Nagar U/s 394/395/412/120-B/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judi. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Mukesh Sharma, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. Reply to the interim bail application is filed by ASI Arvind Kumar, PS, New Ashok Nagar, Delhi. It is stated by Sh. Sharma that application is covered by the imperative of latest guidelines, issued by Ilonible Supreme Court of India as well as H.P.C., Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and his further submission is that accused is in J/C since 26.10.2018, therefore, report with regard to good conduct of the accused from the Superintendent Jail concerned, also his previous involvement and even the period of his judicial custody has to be verified. Let the IO submit report regarding previous involvement of the applicant/accused and Superintendent Jail concerned shall submit the report regarding good conduct and further verification report with respect to the period of his judicial custody, for further consideration, on 10.06.2020, at request of Sh. Sharma. Order be given dasti.

( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District Sr, Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Kamruddin FIR No. 47/18 PS. Kalyan Puri U/s 302/34 IPC

05.06.2020

Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judi. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned.

Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State.

Ms. Ifat Sultana, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused.

SI Pawan Kumar, for IO/Inspector Daya Sagar, is present.

Replies to the bail application as well as interim bail application have already been filed by Inspector Daya Sagar, PS Kalyanpuri, Delhi.

Ms. Sultana, states that due to inadvertence, the application was filed U/s 438 Cr.P.C., though, it should have been filed U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of interim bail for 45 days, in view of emergent situation of Covid-19 pandemic.

Heard. The application is taken to be and treated U/s 439 Cr.P.C.

It is stated by Ms. Sultana, that application is covered by the imperative of latest guidelines, issued by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India as well as H.P.C., Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and her further submission is that accused is in J/C since 06.02.2018, therefore, report with regard to good conduct of the accused from the Superintendent Jail concerned, also his previous involvement and even the period of his judicial custody has to be verified. Let the 10/SHO shall submit report regarding previous involvement of the applicant/accused and

Superintendent Jail concerned shall submit the report regarding good conduct and further verification report with respect to the period of his judicial custody, for further consideration, on 10.06.2020.

Order be given dasti.

( Sanatan Prasaci) Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Waseem FIR No. 691/2015 PS. Mayur Vihar U/s 308/427/34 'PC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Mohd. Arif, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. A reply to the bail application, moved U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of fresh bail, is filed by SI Dinesh Tyagi, PS Mayur Vihar, Delhi. Heard. It appears from the application that the accused was on bail, but did not appear on 29.05.2019 before the Ld. Court concerned and therefore, NBW was issued against the accused and in execution thereof, he was lodged in J/C. There are strict guidelines of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi for not entertaining any matter other than the urgent one and matter pertains to the record of the Court concerned. Ld. counsel wants to withdraw the present application with liberty to move appropriate application for cancellation of NBW before the Ld. Court concerned. Heard. Liberty is granted.

Application stands disposed off and be consigned to record room. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasa Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. lzhar Ahmed & Ors. (Sonu Verma) FIR No. 134/17 PS. Pandav Nagar U/s 302/392/397/411/34 IPC

05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judi. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned.

Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh. Ld. Additional PP for State. Ms. Ifat Sultana, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. Inspector D.K.Tejwan is present and states that he has already filed report to the bail application of the accused Sonu Verma. Ms. Sultana, states that due to inadvertence, the application was filed U/s 438 Cr.P.C., though, it should have been filed U/s 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of interim bail for 45 days, in view of emergent situation of Covid-19 pandemic.

Heard. The application is taken to be and treated U/s 439 Cr.P.C. It is stated by Ms. Sultana, that application is covered by the imperative of latest guidelines, issued by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India as well as H.P.C., Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and her further submission is that accused is in J/C since 04.05.2017, therefore, report with regard to good conduct of the accused from the Superintendent Jail concerned, also his previous involvement and even the period of his judicial custody has to be verified. Let the 10/SHO shall submit report regarding previous involvement of the applicant/accused and

Superintendent Jail concerned shall submit the report regarding good conduct and further verification report with respect to the period of his judicial custody, for further consideration, on 10.06.2020. Order be given dasti.

( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Rohit @ Deepak FIR No. 267/2017 PS. Mayur Vihar U/s 302 IPC & Section 25 Arms Act 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judi. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Devender Kumar, Ld. Counsel for applicant /accused. Reply to the bail application has been filed. Ld. counsel states that IO concerned may be called for, for furnishing clarification with respect to the previous involvement report of the accused, which has been enclosed with reply to the bail application. At request, put up on 09.06.2020 for further consideration, in the matter. IO/SHO shall be present. Order be given dasti. ( S anatan Prasa -n Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Wasim Akram @ Wasim @ Lambu FIR No. 383/19 PS. Pandav Nagar U/s: 186/353/332/307/34 IPC & 25/27 Arms Act 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br./East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Mohd. Ilyas, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused Sh. Wasim Akram @ Lambu. Reply to the interim bail application is filed by IO SI Sh. Sonu Singh. Heard arguments and perused the previous involvement report of the accused. Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused states that there is no specific role of the accused in the present case. He further submits that the medical papers from LNJP Hospital have to be verified as the same were not received by the IO earlier. Copies supplied now. Put up on 10.06.2020 for verification report and further consideration. IO shall also be present. Copy of order be given dasti. r, „..1 ) ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/KKD/Delhi / 05.06.2020 State Vs. Prabhjot Singh FIR No. 152/2019 PS. Krishna Nagar U/s: 393/394/398/120-B IPC & 25/27/54/59 A.Act 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br./East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Raj Kumar, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused Prabhjot Singh. Reply to the bail application is filed by IO/SI Narender Pal Singh, PS Krishna Nagar, Delhi. On request of Ld. Counsel, put up on 06.06.2020 for arguments in the present application as main counsel Sh. L.K. Singh is not available. IO shall also be present.

( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/KKD/Delhi / 05.06.2020 State Vs. Haider Ali FIR No. 679/2014 PS. Preet Vihar U/s 302/394/397/411 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Jucll. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Kapil Singhal, Ld. Counsel for applicant /accused. Reply has already been riled to the interim bail application. Perused previous involvement report, annexed therewith. Let the Superintendent Jail concerned submit the report regarding good conduct and further verification report with respect to the period of judicial custody of the accused, for further consideration, on 09.00.20:0. Order be given dasti.

SanatanS 1-rasad Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Haider Ali FIR No. 679/2014 PS. Preet Vihar U/s 302/394/397/411 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Kapil Singhal, Ld. Counsel for applicant /accused. Reply has already been filed to the interim bail application Perused previous involvement report, annexed therewith. Let the Superintendent Jail concerned sli‘11 submit the report regarding good conduct and further verification report with respect to the period of s judicial custody, for further consideration, on 09.06.2020. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Dheeraj Kumar FIR No. 358/2016 PS. Geeta Colony U/s: 302/34 IPC & 25/27 Arms Act & 3/181, 39/192 M.V. Act

05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br./East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. C.S. Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused Sh. Dheeraj Kumar S/o Sh. Shankar. It appears that reply to the interim bail application, report regarding previous involvement have already been filed. Heard some arguments. At this stage, Ld. Counsel states that accused is in J.C. since 27.09.2016 and he will move application for grant of regular bail and wants to withdraw the present bail application. Heard. Allowed. The present application stands disposed of. The present application be consigned to Record Room. ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/KKD/Delhi / 05.06.2020 State Vs. Sameer Ahmad @ Babba FIR No. 101/2017 PS. Preet Vihar U/s 302/307/120-B/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judi. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Atul Sharma, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused, requested telephonically for adjourning the matter on the grounds that he could not come to the Court today. Report regarding interim bail and previous involvement, is filed. At request, put up on 08.06.2020 for further consideration, in the matter. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Chanchal @ Chokhe @ Yogesh @ Rohit @ Raja FIR No. 465/2017 PS. New Ashok Nagar U/s 365/302/201/120-B/506/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judi. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Vishal Sheoran, Ld. Counsel for applicant

/accused. IO/SI Karamvir in person, files reply to the bail application. Arguments heard. Perused report, dated 04.06.2020 from Superintendent Central Jail No.] 1, Mandoli, Delhi and also previous involvement report of the accused, submitted by the IO present and it appears that besides the present case, the accused has been involved in two other cases in FIR No.12751/2015, U/s 379/411 IPC, PS Crime and FIR No.32042/2016, U/s 379/411/34 IPC, PS Crime, wherein he has already suffered undergone sentence, however, the interim bail is requested on medical grounds. However, ld. counsel Sh. Sheoran concedes that though the present application for grant of interim bail is not covered under the imperative of latest guidelines, issued by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India as well as H.P.C., Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, but interim bail is being requested on medical grounds. Perused medical report, dated 04.06.2020 from SRM, Central Jail No.11, Mandoli, Delh and keeping in view the overall medical report and further the emergent circumstances of Covid-19 pandemic, the applicant/accused Sh. Chanchal @ Chokhe @ Yogesh @ Lohit

@ Raja is allowed interim bail for a period of one week from the date of his release on furnishing of personal bond in the su ri of

Rs.50,000/- with one local surety of the like amount tc the satisfaction of the concerned Court/Duty MM/Ld. Link AM, subject to the conditions that the applicant/accused shall nait try to contact or influence the witnesses directly or indirectly and he shall not indulge himself in any such activity, which ca 1 be prejudicial to the fair trial of the case. Further, the applicant/accused shall appear before the Ld. Trial Court concerned without any demur and will surrender on expiry of the period of interim bail before the Jail Authorities, as per rules.

Copy of this order be given dasti. Copy of this order be sent to the Superintendent Jail for information through email also. The interim bail application is disposed off accordingly. Be consigned to record room.

Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Jud;e (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delh 05.06.2020. 1 State Vs. Nimit Gaba @ Ajay @ Kubba FIR No. 101/17 PS. Preet Vihar U/s: 302/307/120B/148/149/174A/34 IPC & 25/27 Arms Act 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br./East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Sunil Kalra, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. Report to the present bail application as well as report regarding previous involvement have already been filed. Accused is in J.C. since 07.04.2017. There is no previous involvement of present applicant/accused except in the present case as per report regarding good conduct of applicant/accused Sh. Nimit Gaba @ Ajay @ Kubba, dated 02.06.2020 and it appears that accused was issued with PUNISHMENT TICKET, dated 25.04.2020 and thereupon he was warned and ordered to comply with jail rules in future. Ld. Counsel Sh. Sunil Kalra submits that misconduct, complained of is of minor nature and it has no criminal overtones and further the accused shall abide by jail rules scrupulously in future and he is in J.C. since 07.04.2017 and has never been allowed the benefit of interim bail previously. Keeping in view the overall facts and circumstances of the case and in view of emergent situation of 2 State Vs. Nimit Gaba @ Ajay @ Kubba FIR No. 101/17 PS. Preet Vihar U/s: 302/307/120B/148/149/174A/34 IPC & 25/27 Arms Act COVID-19 pandemic, the applicant/accused Nimit Gaba @ Ajay @ Kubba is allowed interim bail for a period of 45 days from the date of his release on furnishing of Personal Bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- to the satisfaction of Superintendent Jail concerned and he will surrender accordingly before the jail authorities on expiry of 45 days from date of his release and he shall not indulge in any activity prejudicial to the fair trial of the case. Copy of order be sent to Superintendent Jail through e-mail also. The application stands disposed of. The application consigned to Record Room.

( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/KKD/Delhi / 05.06.2020 1 Pooja Devi Vs. Uma & Ors.

05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judi. Br./East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. K.S. Goswami, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. M.K. Singh, Ld. Counsel with defendants No. 1 and 3. Sh. Arun Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant No. 5. None for defendants No. 2 and 4. Vakalatnama is filed on behalf of defendants No. 1 and 3. It is submitted by Sh. M.K. Singh that he would represent defendant No. 2 and will file memo of appearance immediately. Sh. Goswami submits report on summons in respect of defendants, also files affidavit of service. Sh. Goswami submits that property in question is joint one but defendants No. 1 to 3 have already disconnected electricity connection. On the other hand, Sh. Singh pleads that plaintiff was allowed to reside in property on compassionate grounds and she is neither paying rent nor paying towards electricity consumption charges. Keeping in view the urgency involved, defendants 2 Pooja Devi Vs. Uma & Ors. No. 1 and 3 are directed not to disconnect electricity supply to the plaintiff and they will ensure electricity supply to the plaintiff for 15 days if they have already disconnected the same, in the meantime, plaintiff may take appropriate steps for obtaining a sub-meter on her own expenses. Put up on 20.06.2020 for WS/reply by all the defendants, also memo of appearance/Vakalatnama on behalf of defendants No. 2 and 4 also, if any. Copy of order be given dasti.

( S natan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/KKD/Delhi / 05.06.2020 1 State Vs. Sameer Ahmed Etc. FIR No. 101/17 PS. Preet Vihar U/s: 302/307/120B/34 IPC & 25/27 Arms Act 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br./East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Prakash Priyadarshi, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused Sameer Ahmed @ Baba S/o Zameer Ahmed in FIR No. 101/17, U/S 302/307/120B/34 IPC and 25/27 Arms Act, PS Preet Vihar. Report regarding good conduct of the above applicant/accused, dated 03.06.2020, received from Superintendent, Central Jail No. 13, Mandoli, Delhi. Sh. Priyadarshi states that he is representing the above applicant/accused i.e. Sh. Sameer Ahmed @ Baba only, which matter has been listed at serial No. 29 of the cause list, dated 05.06.2020, with e-mail id [email protected] and mobile No. 9717061985 and even report of good conduct in respect of the above accused only, has been received from the Superintendent Jail, but strangely the application for interim bail enclosed with the court record is in respect of Jaspreet Singh @ Bunny Sardar, even the matter listed at serial No. 30, already adjourned for 08.06.2020, is in respect of accused Jaspreet 2 State Vs. Sameer Ahmed Etc. FIR No. 101/17 PS. Preet Vihar U/s: 302/307/120B/34 IPC & 25/27 Arms Act Singh @ Bunny Sardar but FIR No. 372/18, U/S 307/34 IPC, PS Geeta Colony, New Delhi, only and his application in respect of the above accused i.e. Sameer Ahmed has not been listed at serial No. 29 with its correct record annexed. Ld. Counsel for above applicant/accused further states that he will take suitable remedial measure immediately and he requests that previous involvement in respect of above applicant/accused be called for alongwith good conduct report in respect of the above applicant/accused. Let the matter be clarified and application be traced. At this stage, Sh. Priyadarshi prays that liberty may be granted to move another application in respect of the above applicant/accused, if desired by him. Heard. Liberty is given. Put up on 08.06.2020 for clarification and further consideration in the matter.

Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/KKD/Delhi / 05.06.2020 State Vs. Deepak Yadav FIR No. 231/2018 PS. Ghazipur U/s 186/353/332/308/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Santosh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. This is an application for issuance of Robkar to the jail authorities of Dasna Jail, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, as the accused is on bail in FIR No.231/2018, U/s 186/353/332/308/34 IPC, PS Ghazipur. Ld. counsel submits that the applicant/accused is unnecessarily suffering on account of issuance of production warrants by the Ld. Court concerned, as earlier, he was incarcerated in Dasna Jail, but was allowed bail in that case vide order, dated 08.05.2020. There are strict guidelines of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi for not taking up any matter other than the urgent one, however, keeping in view the fact that the matter pertains to the liberty of the applicant/accused, let notice be issued to the Ahlmad concerned to put up the file before the Ld. Court concerned for consideration, on 15.06.2020. Order be given dasti. ( anatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Sameer Ahmed & Ors. (Jaspreet Singh @ Bunny Sardar) FIR No. 372/2018 PS. Geeta Colony U/s 307/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Atul Sharma, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused, requested telephonically for adjourning the matter on the grounds that he could not come to the Court today. Reply to the interim bail application, is filed. At request, put up on 08.06.2020 for further consideration, in the matter. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasad) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Karamvir Singh FIR No. 148/2017 PS. Crime Branch U/s 365/397/412/420/467/468/471/120-B/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Vipul Sharma, proxy for Sh. Shailender Babbar, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused, requested telephonically for adjourning the matter on the grounds that arguing counsel Sh. Shailender Babbar is not available today. This is an application for grant of regular bail to accused Karamvir Singh. Let reply be filed by the IO/SHO concerned, for consideration, in the matter on, 08.06.2020. Copy of the application be also given to Ld. Additional PP for State. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Praad Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Gagan @ Manu FIR No. 457/2015 PS. Geeta Colony U/s 302/307/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Vinay Dhaka, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused, requested telephonically that he could not come to the Court today, as is suffering from fever. His further submission was that previous involvement report of the applicant/accused, also his good conduct report from jail concerned and reply to be interim bail application be called for. This is an application for grant of interim bail, moved U/s 439 Cr.P.C., on behalf of accused Gagan @ Manu. Let notice thereof be issued to IO/SHO to file reply to the bail application. The JO shall submit report regarding previous involvement of the applicant/accused and Superintendent Jail concerned shall submit the report regarding his good conduct and further verification report with respect to the period of his judicial custody, for further consideration, on 09.06.2020. JO shall also be present. Copy of the interim bail application be also given to Ld. APP for State. Order be given dasti. () ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Amit Adhana FIR No. 29/2014 PS. Kalyan Puri U/s 394/397/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judi. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Sh. Ravi Kaushal, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. At request, put up on 15.06.2020 for consideration, in the matter before the Court concerned. Order be given dasti. ( Sanatan Prasa Additional District & Sessions Judge (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Zishan Mammu FIR No. 101/2017 PS. Preet Vihar U/s 302/120-B/34 IPC r/w Section 25/27 Arms Act 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judl. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Naveen Kumar, Ld. Counsel for applicant/ accused. This is an application for grant for extension of period of interim bail of applicant/accused Sh. Zishan @ Mammu for a further period of three weeks, which was granted to him vide order, dated 21.05.2020. Sh. Naveen Kumar, ld. counsel for applicant/accused states that the period of interim bail has already expired on 04.06.2020 and the accused has not yet surrendered till this time, as the present application has already been filed on 02.06.2020 through email and was taken up for hearing on 04.06.2020. He further submits the accused shall surrender today and application may be kept pending as certain surgery procedure has to be operated upon on the wife of the accused namely Smt. Taiyabba. Ld. counsel submits that it was because of certain medical complications, (with respect to blood report), and now he will obtain another date for surgery and then will press the application. Perused reply to the interim bail application. It appears that the date of surgery of Smt. Taiyabba was fixed 26.05.2020, but she did not report at the hospital on 26.05.20 Put up on 12.06.2020 for consideration on application. A copy of this order be sent to the IO, who s also be present in person. Copy of this order be also sent to Superintendent Jail concerned for necessary information. Order be given dasti. Q ( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judg (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Delhi 05.06.2020. State Vs. Narsingh Kumar Verma FIR No. 568/2013 PS. New Ashok Nagar U/s 302/392/396/397/412/34 IPC 05.06.2020 Pursuant to Order No.3105-3125/Judi. Br. East/KKD/Delhi, dated 15.04.2020, present application has been assigned to the undersigned. Present : Sh. Yadvender Singh, Ld. Additional PP for State. Sh. Rajni Kant, Ld. Counsel for applicant/accused. This is an application, seeking clarification and to show cause to the Jail Superintendent, Central Jail, Mandoli, Delhi, as to why the applicant/accused Sh. Narsingh Kumar Verma has not been released from the custody in accordance with order, dated 01.06.2020, whereby, the accused was granted interim bail for a period of 45 days, on his furnishing of personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of Jail Superintendent and subject to the condition that the applicant/accused shall not indulge in any such activity which can be prejudicial to the fair trial of the case. Perused report, dated 04.06.2020 from the Superintendent Central Jail No.12, Mandoli, Delhi-93 and as per report, it appears that the order, dated 01.06.2020, issued by the Ld. Court did not mention about Section 302 IPC and copy of custody warrant of the accused Narsingh Kumar Verma is also enclosed, which mentions Section 302 IPC. I have perused copy of the order, dated 01.06.2020, which in fact does not mention about Section 302

IPC in FIR No.568/13, PS New Ashok Nagar, Delhi, how Iver, Sh. Rajni Kant submits that in the application, moved befor the Ld. Court concerned, the prayer did mention about Section 302 IPC. Under the circumstances, the applicant/accused can rove remedial application and present application cannot be considered, as the interim bail was considered and allowci to the applicant/accused only in respect of offences U/s 396/412/120-B IPC in FIR No.568/2013, PS New Ashok 1\1; gar, Delhi, as per record. The application stands disposed off anti be consigned to record room. Order be given dasti.

( Sanatan Prasad ) Additional District & Sessions Judi (East)/Karkardooma Courts/Deihl 05.06.2020.