DOCSLIB.ORG

2004 Plant Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2004 Plant Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Report Plant Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Summary 2004 by: P.R. Bachi J.W. Beale J.R. Hartman D.E. Hershman W.C. Nesmith P. Vincelli TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 2 NATURE OF WORK ......................................................... 2 WEATHER SUMMARY ...................................................... 3 CROP SUMMARIES ......................................................... 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................... 11 EXPLANATORY REMARKS ................................................. 12 SUMMARY TABLES Table 1. Summary of diagnoses by crop category and causal agent type . 13 Table 2. Summary of biotic problems by crop category . 14 Table 3. Number of plant specimens by crop category . 14 Table 4. Summary of diagnoses by crop category and crop . 15 Table 5. Summary of samples received by grower type and crop group . 16 Table 6. Number of specimens referred for diagnosis . 17 Table 7. Special laboratory tests performed . 18 Table 8. Number of specimens received by county and crop category (KY and out-of-state sources) .................................... 19 Table 9. Summary of specialists and diagnosticians making primary diagnoses and consultations ..................................... 21 Table 10. Summary of Digital Consulting System activities . 22 DIAGNOSIS OF INDIVIDUAL SAMPLES BY CROP AND DISEASE/DISORDER Agronomic crops......................................................... 23-28 Corn .............................................................. 23 Forages ............................................................ 24 Soybeans ........................................................... 25 Small grains......................................................... 26 Tobacco............................................................ 27 Fruit crops.............................................................. 29-32 Small fruits ......................................................... 29 Tree fruits .......................................................... 30 Herbs ................................................................... 32 Miscellaneous............................................................. 33 Identifications............................................................. 34 Ornamentals ............................................................ 35-54 Herbaceous Ornamentals and Indoors Plants . 35 Turfgrass ........................................................... 42 Woody Ornamentals .................................................. 44 Vegetables ............................................................. 58-61 1 INTRODUCTION The Plant Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (Lexington and Princeton) handled 3772 plant samples and 260 nematode soil samples during 2004. Samples with more than one problem numbered 632 bringing the total number of actual diagnoses to 4665. The Lexington Laboratory diagnosed 2416 specimens. Of that number there were 231 Nursery samples and 51 Forest/Parks samples from the survey work for the occurrence of the Sudden Oak Death (SOD) pathogen. These samples were diagnosed as to the cause of symptoms even if the sample did not contain the SOD pathogen, which none did. The Princeton Laboratory's specimens totaled 1621; of this number 1357 were plant samples and 264 were soil samples submitted exclusively for soybean cyst nematode analysis. In addition to the 3773 plant samples processed in the laboratory, 351 cases were also submitted in 2004 through the Digital Consulting System for consultation by the Diagnosticians and Extension Plant Pathology Specialists. These numbers are summarized in Figure 1 below: Plant Disease Diagnostic Laboratory - 2004 SCN Plant Samples Princeton 260 3773 1357 Total Samples 4033 Lexington 2416 Samples with >1 diagnosis 632 4665 NATURE OF WORK Plant disease diagnosis is an ongoing educational and research activity of the U.K. Department of Plant Pathology. We maintain two branches of the Plant Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, one on the U.K. campus in Lexington, and one at the U.K. Research and Education Center in Princeton. Making a diagnosis involves a great deal of research into the possible causes of the plant problem. Most visual diagnoses involve microscopy to determine what plant parts are affected and to identify the microbe(s) involved. In addition, many specimens require special tests such as moist chamber incubation, culturing, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), electron microscopy, nematode extraction, or soil pH and soluble salts tests. The laboratory also uses the polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) technique for identification of certain pathogens. Computer-based laboratory records are maintained to provide information used for conducting plant disease surveys, identifying new disease outbreaks, and formulating educational programs. In addition, information from the laboratory forms the basis for timely news of landscape disease problems through the Kentucky Pest News newsletter, radio and television tapes, and plant health care workshops. New homeland security rules now require 2 reporting of all diagnoses of plant diseases to USDA-APHIS on a real-time basis and our laboratories are working to meet that requirement. To assist County Extension Agents and Specialists in dealing with plant disease issues, we also operate a web-based Digital Consulting System utilizing photographic images. The images can be used to help determine how and where best to collect samples for submission to the laboratory, as well as general or specific advice on a wide range of topics. WEATHER SUMMARY January: Near Normal Temperatures and Above Normal Precipitation Temperatures for the period averaged 32.4 degrees across the state which was 0.6 degrees above normal and 5.5 degrees cooler than December 2003. High temperatures averaged from 41 in the West to 41 in the East. Departure from normal high temperatures ranged from 3 degrees below normal in the West to 2 degrees above normal in the East. Low temperatures averaged from 24 degrees in the West to 24 degrees in the East. Departure from normal low temperature ranged from 0 degrees from normal in the West to 2 degrees above normal in the East. Precipitation (liq. equ.) for the period totaled 4.04 inches statewide which was 0.66 inches above normal. Precipitation totals by climate division, West 3.51 inches, Central 3.84 inches, Bluegrass 4.24 inches and East 4.46 inches, which was -0.19, -0.18, +0.79 and +0.76 inches, respectively, from normal. February: Near Normal Temperatures and Below Normal Precipitation Temperatures for the period averaged 37.1 degrees across the state which was 0.1 degree below normal and 4.7 degrees warmer than January 2004. High temperatures averaged from 47 in the West to 47 in the East. Departure from normal high temperatures ranged from 4 degrees below normal in the West to 2 degrees above normal in the East. Low temperatures averaged from 27 degrees in the West to 29 degrees in the East. Departure from normal low temperature ranged from 0 degrees from normal in the West to 3 degrees above normal in the East. Precipitation (liq. equ.) for the period totaled 2.59 inches statewide which was 1.18 inches below normal. Precipitation totals by climate division, West 2.11 inches, Central 3.01 inches, Bluegrass 1.71 inches and East 3.24 inches, which was 1.94, 1.13, 1.73 and 0.23 inches, respectively, below normal. March: Above Normal Temperatures and Below Normal Precipitation Temperatures for the period averaged 49.2 degrees across the state which was 3.0 degrees above normal and 12.1 degrees warmer than February 2004. High temperatures averaged from 61 in the West to 59 in the East. Departure from normal high temperatures ranged from 0 degrees from normal in the West to 4 degrees above normal in the East. Low temperatures averaged from 41 degrees in the West to 39 degrees in the East. Departure from normal low temperature ranged from 5 degrees above normal in the West to 5 degrees above normal in the East. Precipitation (liq. equ.) for the period totaled 4.20 inches statewide which was 0.40 inches below normal. Precipitation totals by climate division, West 4.18 inches, Central 4.68 inches, Bluegrass 3.60 inches and East 4.27 inches, which was 0.50, 0.19, 0.75 and 0.13 inches, respectively, below normal. April: Near Normal Temperatures and Above Normal Precipitation Temperatures for the period averaged 56.0 degrees across the state which was 0.4 degrees above normal and 6.8 degrees warmer than March 2004. High temperatures averaged from 68 in the West to 66 in the East. Departure from normal high temperatures ranged from 3 degrees below normal in the West to 1 degree above normal in the East. Low temperatures averaged from 46 degrees in the West to 46 degrees in the East. Departure from normal low temperature ranged from 0 degrees from normal in the West to 1 degree above normal in the East. 3 Precipitation (liq. equ.) for the period totaled 4.79 inches statewide which was 0.70 inches above normal. Precipitation totals by climate division, West 5.02 inches, Central 5.74 inches, Bluegrass 4.22 inches and East 4.26 inches, which was 0.49, 1.54, 0.32 and 0.44 inches, respectively, from normal. May: Above Normal Temperatures and Above Normal Precipitation Temperatures for the period averaged 69.5 degrees across the state which was 5.1 degrees above normal and 13.5 degrees warmer than April 2004. High temperatures averaged from 80 in the West to 79 in the East. Departure from normal high temperatures
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Managing Potassium for Organic Crop Production by Robert Mikkelsen an Adequate K Supply Is Essential for Both Organic and Conventional Crop Production
    NORTH AMERICA Managing Potassium for Organic Crop Production By Robert Mikkelsen An adequate K supply is essential for both organic and conventional crop production. Potas- sium is involved in many plant physiological reactions, including osmoregulation, protein synthesis, enzyme activation, and photosynthate translocation. The K balance on many farms is negative, where more K is removed in harvested crops than is returned again to the soil. An overview of commonly used K fertilizers for organic production is provided. otassium is an essential nutrient for plant growth, but it often receives less attention than N and P in many crop Pproduction systems. Many regions of the U.S.A. and all of the Canadian provinces remove more K during harvest than is returned to the soil in fertilizer and manure (Figure 1). In the U.S.A., an average of only 3 units of K is replaced as fertilizer and manure for every 4 units of K removed in crops, resulting in a depletion of nutrients from the soil and increasing occur- rences of deficiency in many places. Potassium is the soil cation required in the largest amount by plants, regardless of nutrient management philosophy. 1,400 Removal 1,200 Hay and forage crops can remove hundreds of pounds of K from the soil Manure each year, placing a heavy demand on soil resources. 1,000 Fertilizer Large amounts of K are required to maintain plant health 800 and vigor. Some specific roles of K in the plant include os- moregulation, internal cation/anion balance, enzyme activa- 600 tion, proper water relations, photosynthate translocation, and 400 protein synthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrient Management for Blueberries in Oregon J
    Archival copy. For current information, see the OSU Extension Catalog: https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/em8918 NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT EM 8918 November 2006 $5.00 Nutrient Management for Blueberries in Oregon J. Hart, B. Strik, L. White, and W. Yang Archival copy. For current information, see the OSU Extension Catalog: https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/em8918 Contents Growing condition assumptions .........................................................................................1 Tissue testing .......................................................................................................................2 Interpreting tissue test results ..............................................................................................3 Soil sampling ......................................................................................................................4 Site preparation ...................................................................................................................4 Nitrogen ..............................................................................................................................6 Phosphorus ..........................................................................................................................9 Potassium ............................................................................................................................9 pH and manganese ..............................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Production of Liquid Biofertizer and Biochemical Characterisation of Component Nitrogen-Fixing and Phosphate-Solubilising Bacteria Species
    PRODUCTION OF LIQUID BIOFERTIZER AND BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISATION OF COMPONENT NITROGEN-FIXING AND PHOSPHATE-SOLUBILISING BACTERIA SPECIES BY UZOR, EKENEDILICHUKWU FREDRICK U14/NAS/BTG/023 SUPERVISOR: DR. C.O. ONYIA A PROJECT REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED BIOLOGY, FACULTY OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES, GODFREY OKOYE UNIVERSITY, UGWUOMU-NIKE, ENUGU IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT FOR THE AWARD OF A BACHELOR OF SCIENCE (B.Sc.) DEGREE IN BIOTECHNOLOGY JULY 2018 i APPROVAL This project has been presented to and approved by Godfrey Okoye University, Enugu in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the award of Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.), and degree in Biotechnology from the Department of Biotechnology and Applied Biology. …………………….. ……………….. Uzor, Ekenedilichukwu Fredrick Date Student …………………… ……………… Dr. C.O. Onyia Date Project Supervisor ……………………… ………………. Dr. C.O. Onyia Date Head of Department ii DEDICATION …for my family. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All glory be to God Almighty; Whose grace has been ever sufficient, always. My deepest gratitude goes to my family; my parents - Mr. & Mrs. P. K. O. Uzor, my siblings – Sister Ada, Sister Chi, Oluomachukwu,; thank you for your abundant love, sincere care and unflinching support. To Chidera Ejike, for your deepest care, support and love. Thank you. I wish to appreciate my quintessential supervisor, who is also the Head of my department, Dr. C. O. Onyia; for her pain-staking and diligent efforts in ensuring the success of this work, and for her excellent work in the department. My profound gratitude also goes to the Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Christian Anieke, for ensuring a conducive environment for academic activities; the Dean, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACTS of the III International Weed Science Congress
    ABSTRACTS of the III International Weed Science Congress Foz do Iguassu, Brazil 6 ±11 June 2000 Published by the International Weed Science Society 107 Crop Science Building, Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon, 97331-3002, U.S.A. ISBN 1-891276-16-6 The production of this program has been sponsored by Novartis. International Weed Science Society Ricardo Labrada President Jonathan Gressel Past President Stephen Duke Vice-President Carol Mallory-Smith Secretary-Treasurer Brazilian Weed Science Society Robinson A. Pitelli President Joao Baptista da Silva Vice-President Dionisio Gazziero Secretary Benedito N. Rodrigues Treasurer III International Weed Science Congress Organizing Committee JoaÄo Baptista da Silva Chairman Ricardo Labrada IWSS President Robinson A. Pitelli SBCPD President Jonathan Gressel International Scienti®c Committee Chairman James D. Riggleman International Finance Committee Chairman Geraldo N. Vilela Host Finance Committee Chairman Maria H. T. Mascarenhas Secretary Steve Duke USA Liaison D. L. P. Gazziero Social Programs Carol Mallory-Smith IWSS Secretary-Treasurer Anne LeÂgeÁre Abstract Editor Daniel Cloutier CD-ROM Producer E. Velini, L.L. Foloni, Jens Streibig Members III International Weed Science Congress SPONSORS* ACP American Cyanamid Aventis BASF Corporation Burch CNPq Dow AgroSciences DuPont Agricultural Products European Weed Research Society FAO FINEP FMC Grif®n Ihara Hokko Kumiai Milenia Monsanto Novartis SEPRO United Agri Products USDA-APHIS USDA-ARS Zeneca * List current as of 28 April 2000 III International Weed Science Congress FOREWORD The abstracts herein are those that were reviewed and accepted by April 5, 2000. It is likely that a few poster contributions were submitted after this date, and thus are not included in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Fertilizer Guide
    Utah Fertilizer Guide D. W. James and K. F. Topper, Editors 1989, 1993 AG 431 Table of Contents Chapter Page 1 Diagnosing Plant Nutritional Disorders—An Overview .......................1 K. F. Topper and D. W. James 2 Soil Sampling ........................................................5 D. W. James and K. F. Topper 3 Field Crops .........................................................10 K. F. Topper, T. A. Tindall and D. W. James 4 Fertilization of Fruit Crops .............................................24 D. R. Walker, A. H. Hatch and T. Linstrom 5 Turfgrass and Ornamental Plants ........................................34 W. F. Campbell and W. A. Varga 6 Greenhouse Culture ..................................................42 L. A. Rupp 7 Vegetable Crops .....................................................54 Alvin R. Hamson 8 Fertilizer Composition and Reactions in Soil ...............................58 D. W. James 9 Irrigation Water Quality and Salt-affected Soils .............................68 J. J. Jurinak and K. Topper 10 Soil Amendments and Plant Additives of Unknown or Unproved Utility .........77 D. W. James Glossary ...........................................................80 Foreword The Utah Fertilizer Guide is designed to provide practical answers to routine questions related to soil fertility management. The Guide emphasizes laboratory analysis of soil and plant samples as the keystone to optimum fertilizer rates for maximum economic plant yield and quality. The focus of the Guide is on soil fertility problems peculiar to the semi-arid and arid soils of Utah. The Guide summarizes information used by the Utah State University Soil, Plant and Water Analysis Laboratory (SPWL) for interpreting analytical results of materials submitted by growers, Extension personnel and industrial agriculturists. The Guide can be applied by any laboratory or agency that uses the same standardized analytical procedures used by the SPWL.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Causes of Yellowing During the Tillering Stage of Wheat in Texas
    ESC-040 4/16 Potential Causes of Yellowing During the Tillering Stage of Wheat in Texas Emi Kimura1, Jourdan Bell2, Calvin Trostle3, Clark Neely4, and David Drake5 Yellowing (chlorosis) of wheat leaves in Texas is a in the older leaves first. With N deficiency, yellowing problematic symptom during winter and early spring. starts from the tip of the lower (older) leaves pro- The difficulty in addressing chlorosis appropriately, gressing to the base of the leaf without interveinal is that it can be caused by nutrient deficiency, herbi- chlorosis (Fig. 1). Nitrogen deficiency often occurs in cide injury, freeze damage, moisture stress, disease water-logged conditions. Although it is rarely found and insect issues—or any combination thereof. If in Texas, molybdenum (Mo) and manganese (Mn) yellowing is occurring in your field, you can use the deficiency symptoms also show chlorosis in older factors listed below to evaluate your crop, determine leaves. Nitrogen deficiency is a common nutrient de- the potential cause(s) of the symptom, and select an ficiency symptom in the Rolling Plains, High Plains, appropriate management strategy. and in west Texas, especially in wheat planted after cotton. Nutrient deficiency Yellowing in the older leaves without interveinal chlorosis: N deficiency Where a nutrient deficiency symptom appears depends on plant nutrient mobility. Nutrient demand is greatest in the part of the wheat plant that is ac- tively growing. As the plant grows, it will translocate mobile nutrients from older growth to the actively growing region. Therefore, nutrient deficiency symp- toms of mobile nutrients such as nitrogen (N) appear *Extension Agronomist at 1Vernon ([email protected], 940-552- 9941), 2Amarillo ([email protected], 806-677-5600), 3Lubbock ([email protected], 806-746-6101), and 5San Angelo (drdrake@ ag.tamu.edu, 325-653-4576), TX.
    [Show full text]
  • High Yielding Corn
    High Yielding Corn: Implementing Research and Adapting for Profitability Fluid Fertilizer Forum February 16, 2015 4R Plant Nutrition: • Right Source Russell French, CCA • Right Rate Account Manager • Right Time Amarillo, TX DuPont Pioneer • Right Place Farmers ask: Do I need more/less fertilizer? When do I need to apply? Is Product A better than B? Is Method A better than B? Will it pay? What would you do if you were me? Plot Locations (2010-2013) Spatial and Temporal Analyses Irrigation Capacity Impact on Yield Predicted Irr Capacity Yield 2011 Yield 2012 Yield 2013 Yield GPM/A 3.0 - 3.9 120-160 75 140 170 4.0 - 4.4 160-180 120 180 205 4.5 – 4.9 190-220 177 221 240 5.0 - 5.5 230-250 223 238 254 5.6 - 5.9 250-270 234 265 262 6.0+ 270+ 242 265 270 2010 Plot Averages by Nitrogen Timing No post tassel nitrogen Nitrogen applied brown silk 19 Plots 21 plots Avg Yield 217 bu/acre Avg Yield 248 bu/acre Low yield: 170 bu/acre Low yield: 183 bu/acre High yield: 269 bu/acre High yield: 302 bu/acre 3 plots over 240+ bu/acre 14 plots over 240+ bu/acre Nitrogen Uptake During Grain Fill Research conducted over the last five years has show that nitrogen needed for grain development originates from both remobilized N and continued N uptake from the soil; and that Newer hybrids take up additional N post-flowering compared to older hybrids. Center Pivot applied UAN post tassel Photo by Alyssa Abbott, DuPont/Pioneer Account Manager; NE Illinois Pivot Applied UAN Post Tassel Photo by Alyssa Abbott, DuPont/Pioneer Account Manager; NE Illinois Photo by Alyssa
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Test Interpretations and Fertilizer Management for Lawns, Turf, Gardens, and Landscape Plants
    Soil Test Interpretations and Fertilizer Management for Lawns, Turf, Gardens, and Landscape Plants Carl J. Rosen, Peter M. Bierman, and Roger D. Eliason Department of Soil, Water, and Climate Soil Test Interpretations and Fertilizer Management for Lawns, Turf, Gardens, and Landscape Plants Carl J. Rosen, Peter M. Bierman, and Roger D. Eliason Department of Soil, Water, and Climate The information given in this publication is for educational purposes only. Reference to commercial products or trade names is made with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by University of Minnesota Extension is implied. Copyright © 2008, Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. i Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................1 Taking a Soil Sample .........................................................................................................................2 Soil pH Modification..........................................................................................................................3 Raising Soil pH ......................................................................................................................4 Mineral soils .....................................................................................................................4 Organic soils ....................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Fertilization Handout
    What is an essential nutrient? Please Do Not Feed the Trees: 1. Nutrient element directly involved in Proper Tree and Shrub Nutrition in the metabolic processes Urban Landscape 2. Cannot be replaced by another element Dr. Laura G. Jull 3. Plant cannot complete it’s life cycle Dept. of Horticulture without the element UW-Madison 17 Essential Elements Where Do Essential Nutrients Come From? 94% of dry weight is C, H, O from air and water P Mn ♦ Atmospheric Sources: N2 deposition, acid rain (S) ♦ Mineral Sources: parent material, fertilizers K Zn 80% 20% ♦ Organic Sources: biological breakdown of organic N S Cu matter and biological components of the soil that of the essential mineral elements Ca B aid in P uptake or N fixation taken up by plants on an annual basis Mg Mo ♦ Plants do not distinguish between ions from inorganic and organic sources Elements Derived Cl From Soil: parent Fe ♦ All organic forms must be converted to inorganic material and organic ions to be absorbed by plants Ni* matter Organic Sources of Not all OM is the Same Essential Elements Source C:N Ratio Wood 100-500 Sawdust 200-700 The process is driven by soil Fallen Leaves 30-80 inhabiting organisms The type, abundance, and activity of micro- Fresh Leaves 20-30 organisms are influenced by soil and environmental conditions and substrate Grass Clippings 15-25 they feed upon Inside Cell Cell Membrane Outside Cell Soil pH Affects + K Passive Diffusion Solubility Uptake and Most essential Assimilation of elements sufficiently Essential soluble around pH 7 Elements Often
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME AUTHOR Soils, Crops and Fertilizer Use. a What, How and Why Pests
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 241 778 CE 038 582 AUTHOR Leonard, Dave TITLE Soils, Crops and Fertilizer Use. A What, How and Why Guide. Appropriate Technologies for Development. Reprint R-8. INSTITUTION Peace Corps, Washington, DC. Information Collection and Exchange Div. PUB DATE Feb 80 NOTE 171p. PUB TYPE Guides - Classroom Use Guides (For Teachers) (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC07 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Agricultural Education; *Agricultural Production; Agricultural Safety; *Agricultural Skills; *Agricultural Supplies; Agriculture; Agronomy; Botany; Entomology; *Fertilizers; *Field Crops; Grains (Food); Guidelines; Harvesting; Land Use; Pests; Plant Growth; Plant Pathology; Postsecondary Education; *Soil Conservation; Soil Science; Vocational Education; Voluntary Agencies; Volunteers; Volunteer Training; Weeds ABSTRACT This manual, prepared for use by Peace Corps volunteers in developing countries,; has been designed as an on-the-job reference for soil management and fertilizer use at the small farmer level. It provides information on yield-boosting techniques, especially in the areas of soil conservation, organic and chemical fertilizer use, and the safe and appropriate use of agricultural chemicals. The text is written in a "how to" format, in as nontechnical language as possible, and takes a problem-solving approach to soil, management and fertilizer use. Organized into nine sections, the text covers the following topics: soil basics, spotting and fixing soil physical problems, seedbed preparation, soil fertility basics, determining fertilizer needs, how to use organic fertilizers and soil conditioners, chemical fertilizers, liming soils, and salinity and alkalinity problems. An appendix to the manual provides conversion tables, composition of common fertilizers, information on soil moisture content, erosion control approaches, and hunger signs in common crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Fertilizers and Soil Amendments 10
    a self-study course from MSU Extension Continuing Education Series a self-study course from Nutrient Management 10 Nutrient Management Module No. 10 CCA 2.5 NM Commercial CEU Fertilizers and Soil Amendments by Ann McCauley, Soil Scientist; Clain Jones, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist; and Jeff Jacobsen, College of Agriculture Dean Introduction This module is the tenth in a series of Extension materials designed to provide Extension agents, Certified Crop Advisers (CCAs), consultants, and producers with pertinent information on nutrient management issues. To make the learning ‘active’, and to provide credits to CCAs, a quiz accompanies this module. In addition, realizing that there are many other good information sources, including previously developed extension materials, books, web sites, and professionals in the field, we have provided a list of additional resources and contacts for those wanting more in-depth information about fertilizers and amendments. This module covers the Rocky Mountain CCA Nutrient Management Competency Area VI: Nutrient sources and applications. Objectives After completing this module, the reader should: 1. Understand fertilizer grade and calculate elemental nutrient content of a fertilizer 2. Recognize fertilizer manufacturing processes and forms 3. Know the effects of various fertilizers on soil pH and salt concentrations 4. Understand fertilizer reactions in the soil 5. Determine the appropriate soil amendment for a given soil condition 6. Recognize the potential for heavy metal accumulation following fertilizer or amendment application and calculate maximum allowable metal levels for products 4449-10 May 2009 Background Commercial fertilizer and amendment 15-30-15 use increased substantially worldwide GUARANTEED ANALYSIS during the latter half of the 20th century st and continues to increase into the 21 Total Nitrogen (N) ............................15.0% century.
    [Show full text]
  • Fertilizer Recommendations by Crops, Categorized (Crop Codes in Parentheses)
    Fertilizer Recommendations by Crops, Categorized (Crop codes in parentheses) I Field Crops II Pastures, Hay Crops (cont.) 1. (701) Canola Spring Type 14. (039) Fescue-Clover Associations 2. (702) Canola Winter Type 15. (742) Forage Chicory 3. (001) Corn (for Grain) Dryland 16. (036) Hybrid Bermudas - Pasture 4. (002) Corn (for Grain) Irrigated 150 bu/a 17. (038) Hybrid Bermudas-Hay 29. (C01) Corn (for Grain) Irrigated 200 bu/a 18. (043) Hybrid Millets 30. (C02) Corn (for Grain) Irrigated 250 bu/a 19. (033) Lupine 31. (C03) Corn (for Grain) Irrigated 300 bu/a 21. (041) Orchard Grass Pasture 6. (500) Cotton - 750 lbs yield goal 22. (051) Perennial Peanuts 7. (501) Cotton - 1000 lbs yield goal 23. (048) Sericea 8. (502) Cotton - 1250 lbs yield goal 24. (044) Sorghum Sudan Hybrids 9. (503) Cotton - 1500 lbs yield goal 25. (031) Subterranean Clover 10. (006) Grain Sorghum 26. (049) Summer Perennials Overseeded in Fall 5. (003) Irrigated Corn Silage 31. (SGB) Switchgrass and other native 27. (KEN) Kenaf grasses-Biomass and forage 11. (010) Peanuts 32. (SGW) Switchgrass and other native 12. (013) Small Grain - Barley grasses-Wildlife 13. (012) Small Grain - Oats 27. (050) Temporary Winter Grazing 14. (014) Small Grain - Rye for Seed Production or 28. (034) Vetch Cover Crop 29. (741) White Clover 15. (011) Small Grain - Wheat 16. (711) Small Grain Silage III Pine Trees, Field Nursery Stock, and Christmas 17. (004) Sorghum Silage Trees 18. (017) Soybeans 1. (078) Christmas Trees - Cedar 19. (008) Sugar Cane 2. (077) Christmas Trees - Pine and Leyland 20.
    [Show full text]