DOCSLIB.ORG

Severn Estuary Tidal Power: Supplemental Information May 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Severn Estuary Tidal Power: Supplemental Information May 2010 Severn Estuary Tidal Power: Supplemental Information May 2010 Together with the Severn Estuary Tidal Power research paper, this report provides briefing on the current Severn tidal power situation and includes detailed analysis of the short listed proposals. The National Assembly for Wales is the democratically elected body that represents the interests of Wales and its people, makes laws for Wales and holds the Welsh Government to account. The Members’ Research Service is part of the National Assembly for Wales. We provide confidential and impartial research support to the Assembly’s scrutiny and legislation committees, and to all 60 individual Assembly Members and their staff. Members’ Research Service briefings are compiled for the benefit of Assembly Members and their support staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. We welcome comments on our briefings; please post or email to the addresses below. An electronic version of this paper can be found on the National Assembly’s website at: www.assemblywales.org/bus-assembly-publications-research.htm Further hard copies of this paper can be obtained from: Members’ Research Service National Assembly for Wales Cardiff Bay CF99 1NA Email: [email protected] © National Assembly for Wales Commission Copyright 2010 The text of this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading or derogatory context. The material must be acknowledged as copyright of the National Assembly for Wales Commission and the title of the document specified. Enquiry no: 10 / 1008 Severn Estuary Tidal Power: Supplementary Information May 2010 Chris Peters Paper Number: 10 / 011 - SI Members’ Research Service gratefully acknowledges the parliamentary fellowship provided to Mr Peters by the Natural Environment Research Council, which enabled this research paper to be completed. Contents 1. Middle barrage (Cardiff – Weston) ............................................................................................1 1.1. Construction ..........................................................................................1 1.2. Timeline.................................................................................................1 1.3. Projected cost ........................................................................................2 1.4. Socio-economic impacts.........................................................................2 1.4.1. Transport and logistics ..........................................................................3 1.4.2. Tourism .................................................................................................4 1.5. Fisheries ................................................................................................5 1.6. Environmental impacts...........................................................................6 1.6.1. Terrestrial and freshwater ecology.........................................................6 1.6.2. Ornithology ...........................................................................................8 1.6.3. Bird watching.......................................................................................10 1.6.4. Marine ecology ....................................................................................10 1.7. Geomorphology ...................................................................................11 1.8. Flood risk.............................................................................................12 1.9. Historic environment ...........................................................................14 1.10. Navigation ...........................................................................................15 1.11. Marine aggregates ...............................................................................16 1.12. Marine waste disposal..........................................................................16 2. Small barrages (Shoots barrage and Beachley barrage) ............................................. 18 2.1. Construction ........................................................................................18 2.2. Socio-economic impacts.......................................................................18 2.2.1. Transport and logistics ........................................................................19 2.2.2. Tourism ...............................................................................................20 2.3. Fisheries ..............................................................................................20 2.4. Environmental impact ..........................................................................21 2.4.1. Terrestrial and freshwater ecology.......................................................21 2.4.2. Ornithology .........................................................................................21 2.4.3. Marine ecology ....................................................................................22 2.5. Geomorphology ...................................................................................23 2.6. Flood risk.............................................................................................24 2.7. Historic environment ...........................................................................24 2.8. Navigation ...........................................................................................25 2.9. Other sea uses.....................................................................................26 3. Tidal lagoons (Fleming and Bridgewater Bay lagoons) ............................................... 28 3.1. Construction ........................................................................................28 3.2. Socio-economic impacts.......................................................................28 3.2.1. Transport and logistics ........................................................................29 3.2.2. Tourism ...............................................................................................29 3.3. Fisheries ..............................................................................................30 3.4. Environmental impact ..........................................................................30 3.4.1. Terrestrial and freshwater ecology.......................................................31 3.4.2. Ornithology .........................................................................................31 3.4.3. Marine ecology ....................................................................................32 3.5. Geomorphology ...................................................................................32 3.6. Flood risk.............................................................................................33 3.7. Historic environment ...........................................................................33 3.8. Navigation ...........................................................................................34 3.9. Other sea uses.....................................................................................34 4. Comparison with La Rance and Eastern Schelde............................................................ 36 4.1. La Rance ..............................................................................................36 4.2. Eastern Schelde....................................................................................37 Annex ............................................................................................................................................................. 39 A. Glossary of terms...........................................................................................................................39 Energy terms ....................................................................................................................................39 B. Abbreviations...................................................................................................................................40 1. Middle barrage (Cardiff – Weston) 1.1. Construction Construction of caissons1 and turbines and the employment of general construction labour are the three greatest components that will impact socially and economically on local areas.2 There is great uncertainty regarding the displacement, or ‘leakage’ of construction related economic benefits from local to national or even international areas. The sheer number of turbines required in a large (Cardiff – Weston) barrage may result in the turbines being constructed in the region.3 A smaller barrage for example may see an increased leakage of turbine construction out of the immediate area as technology is sourced from elsewhere. The issue of leakage affects all areas of construction. Turbines have been used as an example as they represent a substantial element of the overall project cost.4 1.2. Timeline The Severn Tidal Power Group (STPG) consider that the Cardiff – Weston barrage could be built in approximately seven years, depending on the number of work yards made available for the construction of caissons, and on the sizes of ship locks5 required. The ship locks are a key element of a barrage construction and must be completed before the installation of turbine caissons starts to obstruct shipping lanes.6 Lord Hunt, Minister of State, Department of Energy and Climate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Economics of the Green Investment Bank: Costs and Benefits, Rationale and Value for Money
    The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money Report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills Final report October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 2 Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). Vivid Economics would like to thank BIS staff for their practical support in the review of outputs throughout this project. We would like to thank McKinsey and Deloitte for their valuable assistance in delivering this project from start to finish. In addition, we would like to thank the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), the Carbon Trust and Sustainable Development Capital LLP (SDCL), for their valuable support and advice at various stages of the research. We are grateful to the many individuals in the financial sector and the energy, waste, water, transport and environmental industries for sharing their insights with us. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors and not those of BIS or any other party, and the authors take responsibility for any errors or omissions. An appropriate citation for this report is: Vivid Economics in association with McKinsey & Co, The economics of the Green Investment Bank: costs and benefits, rationale and value for money, report prepared for The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, October 2011 The economics of the Green Investment Bank: cost and benefits, rationale and value for money 3 Executive Summary The UK Government is committed to achieving the transition to a green economy and delivering long-term sustainable growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour's Zero-Based Review
    Labour’s Zero-Based Review Interim Report Number 15: Department for Energy and Climate Change Labour’s Zero-Based Review Interim Report No.15 DEPARTMENT FOR ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE FOREWORD The leader of the Labour Party, Ed Miliband, and the Shadow ChanCellor, Ed Balls, have made Clear that departmental budgets will be cut not only in 2015-16, but each year until we have achieved our promise to balanCe the books. Across every part of the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), we need to take a tighter approach to finanCial management of taxpayers’ money, and reform the framework within which the energy market operates so that it is fair for bill payers. Under the Tory’s failing plan, energy bills have risen, and energy Companies have failed to pass on falling wholesale Costs. Record numbers of families with children Cannot afford to heat their homes. Investors face unCertainty and indeCision about the future of our energy system. And the mismanagement of taxpayers’ money, such as through the Government’s poor-value Green Deal Home Improvement Fund, and the NuClear Decommissioning Authority’s budget, have seen tens of millions of pounds wasted. Britain needs a government that will stand up to the energy Companies to deliver fairer prices and a better deal for bill payers. A government that is serious about tackling the sCandal of fuel poverty and cold homes. And a government that is putting in place the vital reforms neCessary for investment in the low Carbon future of our energy system, and to deliver value for money for the taxpayer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Performance of the Department of Energy & Climate Change 2012-13
    DEPARTMENTAL OVERVIEW The performance of the Department of Energy & Climate Change 2012-13 NOVEMBER 2013 Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. Our public audit perspective helps Parliament hold government to account and improve public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Amyas Morse, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO, which employs some 860 staff. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our studies evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our recommendations and reports on good practice help government improve public services, and our work led to audited savings of almost £1.2 billion in 2012. Contents Introduction Aim and scope of this briefing 4 Part One About the Department 5 Part Two Recent NAO work on the Department 24 Appendix One The Department’s sponsored bodies at 1 April 2013 29 Appendix Two Results of the Civil Service People Survey 2012 30 Appendix Three Publications by the NAO on the Department since April 2011 32 Appendix Four Cross-government reports of relevance to the Department since April 2011 34 Links to external websites were valid at the time of publication of this report. The National Audit Office is not responsible for the future validity of the links.
    [Show full text]
  • Tyndall Centre Briefing Note 40
    Review of the Fourth Carbon Budget - Call for Evidence www.theccc.org.uk/call-for-evidence Question and Response form When responding please provide answers that are as specific and evidence-based as possible, providing data and references to the extent possible. Please limit your response to a maximum of 400 words per question. Questions for consideration: A. Climate Science and International Circumstances The Committee’s advice assumes a climate objective to limit central estimates of temperature rise to as close to 2C as possible, with a very low chance of exceeding 4C by 2100 (henceforth referred to as “the climate objective”). This is broadly similar to the UNFCCC climate objective, and that of the EU. In order to achieve this objective, global emissions would have to peak in the next few years, before decreasing to roughly half of recent levels by 2050 and falling further thereafter. The UNFCCC is working toward a global deal consistent with such reductions, to be agreed by 2015. Earlier attempts (e.g. at Copenhagen in 2009, before the fourth budget was recommended or legislated) have failed to achieve a comprehensive global deal to limit emissions. It is difficult to imagine a global deal which allows developed countries to have emissions per capita in 2050 which are significantly above a sustainable global average, implying the need for emissions reductions in the UK of at least 80% from 1990 levels by 2050. The EU has not yet agreed a package beyond 2020, but the European Commission is consulting on a range of issues relating to development of climate and energy targets for 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C
    Global warming of 1.5°C An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty Summary for Policymakers Edited by Valérie Masson-Delmotte Panmao Zhai Co-Chair Working Group I Co-Chair Working Group I Hans-Otto Pörtner Debra Roberts Co-Chair Working Group II Co-Chair Working Group II Jim Skea Priyadarshi R. Shukla Co-Chair Working Group III Co-Chair Working Group III Anna Pirani Wilfran Moufouma-Okia Clotilde Péan Head of WGI TSU Head of Science Head of Operations Roz Pidcock Sarah Connors J. B. Robin Matthews Head of Communication Science Officer Science Officer Yang Chen Xiao Zhou Melissa I. Gomis Science Officer Science Assistant Graphics Officer Elisabeth Lonnoy Tom Maycock Melinda Tignor Tim Waterfield Project Assistant Science Editor Head of WGII TSU IT Officer Working Group I Technical Support Unit Front cover layout: Nigel Hawtin Front cover artwork: Time to Choose by Alisa Singer - www.environmentalgraphiti.org - © Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The artwork was inspired by a graphic from the SPM (Figure SPM.1). © 2018 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Revised on January 2019 by the IPCC, Switzerland. Electronic copies of this Summary for Policymakers are available from the IPCC website www.ipcc.ch ISBN 978-92-9169-151-7 Introduction Chapter 2 ChapterSummary 1 for Policymakers 6 Summary for Policymakers Summary for Policymakers SPM SPM Summary SPM for Policymakers Drafting Authors: Myles R.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Democratic Representation Can Select Committees Influence a Company’S Environmental, Social and Governance Credentials?
    Climate Change and Democratic Representation Can Select Committees influence a company’s environmental, social and governance credentials? Stanley Kwong 2 Executive Summary The House of Commons Select Committees (Committees) are a group of MPs from different political parties tasked with examining policy issues, holding the government and companies to account, and making proposals for new laws. An area where Committee assertiveness is particularly evident is in relation to topics concerning sustainability. This is in part driven by large scale environmental disasters that warranted Committee investigation. For example, inquiries concerning BP’s oil rig catastrophe (by the Energy and Climate Change Committee) and Volkswagen’s diesel emissions scandal (by the Environmental Audit Committee) drew widespread public and media interest. Public awareness on climate change issues has further elevated Committee work in this area, with a particular emphasis on scrutinising companies that hold poor sustainability practices that affect wider society. From an economic perspective this is typical of a negative externality, with Professor Stern (2008) calling global warming ‘the greatest market failure of all time’. However, the climate crisis may be more pronounced than a solely economic failure. In particular, it may also highlight fundamental deficiencies and systemic failures in the governance of liberal democracies. In this context, the emergence of mechanisms of deliberative democracy, such as the Climate Assembly UK, have grown in popularity as formats that aim to cultivate citizen representation and participation. Nevertheless, the public continue to look to elected representatives for action, particularly on the gap that remains on private sector company oversight. This is where the Committees’ distinctive investigative approach can be a key component in driving forward the climate dialogue, by adding a unique layer of public and investigative pressure on companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Energy in Korea
    APEC Youth Scientist Journal Vol. 5 TIDAL ENERGY IN KOREA ∗ Jeong Min LEE 1 1 Goyang Global High School, 1112 Wi city 4-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea 410-821 ABSTRACT Tidal energy is one of the few renewable energy resources Korean government is planning on to implant in Korean Peninsula. Due to its continuity and environmental friendliness, tidal energy is getting its attention as appropriate alternative energy for Korea that can replace conventional fossil fuels. On the other hand, while Korean government is pushing forward to build tidal plants using Korea’s geographical advantages following the construction of tidal plants, many locals are holding demonstrations in order to stop tidal plants from being built. These disputes are holding off government’s original plan to construct tidal plants in Incheon Bay area. In this study, concept of using tidal energy and various methods will be introduced, followed by Korea’s geographical conditions for constructing tidal power plants. Concerning construction of tidal plants in Korea, problems regarding the issue will also be covered. This will provide current status of tidal energy as renewable resource in Korea, and how it will change to impact the country. Keywords: tidal power, geographical advantage, tidal plant sites, ecological impact, conflict ∗ Correspondence to : Jeong Min L EE ([email protected]) - 174 - APEC Youth Scientist Journal Vol. 5 1. INTRODUCTION Energy we use to produce electricity and heat has brought great changes on how we live today. However, nowadays despite successful contribution to improvements of human lives, conventional resources are losing its stature for creating many problems to global society.
    [Show full text]
  • MCA Climate Action Plan
    13 51 6 Al Sb C Aluminium Solar cells Antimony Carbon 27 29 79 Co Cu Au Cobalt Copper Gold Batteries 26 3 25 Fe Li Mn Hydrogen Iron Lithium Manganese 12 28 41 Mg Ni Nb Magnesium CCUS Nickel Niobium 50 92 30 Sn U Zn Tin Uranium Zinc EV & hybrids Nuclear Mineral Wind Rare earth energy sands energy elements Copyright © 2020 Minerals Council of Australia CLIMATE ACTION PLAN PREAMBLE minerals.org.au Supporting ongoing climate action by Australia’s minerals industry The MCA and all of its Sustained climate action across all nations is 4. Accelerated development of the This 2020-2023 plan furthers the minerals well as taking a lead on commodity stewardship required to reduce the risks of human-induced minerals required for a low emissions sector’s public commitment to addressing looking at global procurement practices, circular members are taking serious climate change and to support world-wide future including aluminium, copper, nickel, climate change on an ongoing basis consistent economy, and traceability of commodities action on climate change decarbonisation as we transform to a lower zinc, iron, uranium, base metals, lithium, with the MCA’s climate statement. It outlines a through their lifecycle. emissions future. minerals sands, and rare earths series of actions focused on three key themes: and are committed to the Practical and cost-effective options are already Our sector improves the lives of millions of 5. Global and domestic partnerships 1. Support developing technology pathways to being developed and put into action across the Paris Agreement and its goal people in Australia and overseas through the with governments, regulators, customers, achieve significant reductions in Australia’s minerals value chain.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Energy and How It Pertains to the Construction Industry
    Tidal Energy and how it Pertains to the Construction Industry Armin Latifi California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo Renewable Energy is on the forefront of many global discussions. The concern of numerous scientific findings on the impact humanity has had on the environment has grown in recent years. Since alternative energy sources, such as solar and wind, have already made substantial progress, I have decided to focus my attention on tidal energy specifically. This topic will serve as the main focus of this essay. Within this essay, I will examine how tidal energy pertains to the construction industry through four distinguished chapters: (1) What kind of tidal technology exist and what does the construction aspect of these tidal technologies require? (2) What are some of the risks and rewards of building a tidal energy plant and is it profitable for a general contractor? (3) What would make tidal energy a more desirable source of renewable energy when compared to others? (4) What would be considered a good site to develop a tidal energy plant? Hopefully, my research will provide general contractors with a better idea of what tidal energy projects will entail and if it’s a viable option to pursue. Keywords: Tidal Energy, Tidal Energy Plant, Tidal Energy Profitability, Tidal Energy Sites, Renewable Energy Introduction Tidal Energy is an underutilized source of energy. Although it is a form of renewable energy, like solar and wind, it differs in that it is produced from hydropower. More specifically, tidal generators convert the energy obtained from the Earth’s tides into what we would consider a useful form of power (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • La Rance Barrage
    Case Study: La Rance Barrage Project Name La Rance Barrage Location The Rance estuary in Brittany, France Installed capacity 240MW Technology Type Tidal impoundment barrage Project Type/Phase Full scale experimental power plant Year Operational since 1967 Project Description The Rance tidal power plant is located on the estuary of the Rance River, in Brittany, France (Figure 1). Following twenty-five years of research and six years of construction work, the 240MW La Rance Barrage became the first commercial-scale tidal power plant in the world. It was built as a large scale demonstration project for low-head hydro technology. The construction of the tidal power plant started in 1961, and was completed in 1967 1. The Rance estuary has one of the highest tidal ranges in the world (an average of 8 meters, reaching up to 13.5 metres during equinoctial spring tides) which makes it an attractive site for tidal impoundment power generation. The complete barrage is 750m long and 13m high with a reservoir of 22km 2 capable of impounding 180 million cubic meters 1. The structure includes a dam 330m long in which the turbines are housed, a lock to allow the passage of small craft, a rock-fill dam 165m long and a mobile weir with six gates. Before construction of the tidal barrage, two temporary dams were built across the estuary in order to create a dry construction site; an effort which took two years. In July 1963, the Rance was cut off from the ocean and construction of the tidal barrage commenced. This took another three years 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Energy & Climate Change Short Guide
    A Short Guide to the Department of Energy & Climate Change July 2015 Overview Decarbonisation Ensuring security Affordability Legacy issues of supply | About this guide This Short Guide summarises what the | Contact details Department of Energy & Climate Change does, how much it costs, recent and planned changes and what to look out for across its main business areas and services. If you would like to know more about the NAO’s work on the DECC, please contact: Michael Kell Director, DECC VfM and environmental sustainability [email protected] 020 7798 7675 If you are interested in the NAO’s work and support The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General for Parliament more widely, please contact: (C&AG), Sir Amyas Morse KCB, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO, which employs some 810 people. The C&AG Adrian Jenner certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other Director of Parliamentary Relations public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report [email protected] to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our 020 7798 7461 studies evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our recommendations and reports on good practice For full iPad interactivity, please view this PDF help government improve public services, and our work led to Interactive in iBooks or GoodReader audited savings of £1.15 billion in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Combining Flood Damage Mitigation with Tidal Energy
    COMBINING FLOOD DAMAGE MITIGATION WITH TIDAL ENERGY GENERATION: LOWERING THE EXPENSE OF STORM SURGE BARRIER COSTS David R. Basco, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, 23528, USA Storm surge barriers across tidal inlets with navigation gates and tidal-flow gates to mitigate interior flood damage (when closed) and minimize ecological change (when open) are expensive. Daily high velocity tidal flows through the tidal-flow gate openings can drive hydraulic turbines to generate electricity. Money earned by tidal energy generation can be used to help pay for the high costs of storm surge barriers. This paper describes grey, green, and blue design functions for barriers at tidal estuaries. The purpose of this paper is to highlight all three functions of a storm surge barrier and their necessary tradeoffs in design when facing the unknown future of rising seas. Keywords: storm surge barriers, mitigate storm damage, maintain estuarine ecology, generate renewable energy INTRODUCTION Accelerating sea levels are impacting the over 600 million people worldwide currently living near tidal estuaries in coastal regions. Residential property, public infrastructure, the economy, ports and navigation interests, and the ecosystem are at risk. Climate change has resulted from the burning of fossil fuels (oil, coal, gas, gasoline, etc.) and is the major reason for rising seas. As a result, conversion to renewable energy sources (solar, wind, wave, and tide.) is taking place. However, tidal energy is the only renewable energy resource that is available 24/7 with no downtime due to no sun or no wind or no waves. The daily tidal variation at the entrance to tidal estuaries is always present and is the driving force for the resulting ecology and water quality.
    [Show full text]