DOCSLIB.ORG

CITY of SHORELINE Shoreline Inventory and Characterization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CITY of SHORELINE Shoreline Inventory and Characterization CITY OF SHORELINE Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Prepared for: December 2008, Revised November 2009 and April 2010 City of Shoreline 17544 Midvale Avenue N. Shoreline, WA 98133 City of Shoreline – Shoreline Inventory and Characterization TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Purpose ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Shoreline Jurisdiction and Study Area Boundary ........................................................... 1 1.3 Shoreline Planning Segments ......................................................................................... 2 2. CURRENT REGULATORY FRAMEWORK SUMMARY ................................................ 17 2.1 City of Shoreline Regulations ....................................................................................... 17 2.1.1 Current Shoreline Management Act Compliance ................................................. 17 2.1.2 Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Other City Regulations ................................... 18 2.2 State and Federal Regulations ....................................................................................... 18 3. WATERSHED AND DRAINAGE BASINS ........................................................................ 19 4. LAND USE PATTERNS ...................................................................................................... 20 4.1 Historical Land Use ...................................................................................................... 20 4.2 Existing Land Use ......................................................................................................... 21 4.2.1 Residential Land Use ............................................................................................ 21 4.2.2 Commercial and Industrial Land Uses .................................................................. 22 4.2.3 Private and Public Utility Land Uses .................................................................... 22 4.2.4 Parks, Open Space and Vacant Land Uses ........................................................... 22 4.3 Comprehensive Plan / Zoning Designations ................................................................. 23 4.3.1 Comprehensive Plan ............................................................................................. 23 4.3.2 Zoning Designations ............................................................................................. 23 4.4 Impervious Surface ....................................................................................................... 24 4.5 Existing and Planned Public Access Sites .................................................................... 26 4.6 Roads and Transportation Facilities .............................................................................. 27 4.7 Wastewater and Stormwater Utilities ........................................................................... 28 4.8 Historical/Cultural Resources ....................................................................................... 29 4.9 Site Contamination ........................................................................................................ 30 5. NEARSHORE PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION ......................................................... 30 5.1 Nearshore Processes ...................................................................................................... 30 Source: Johannessen et al. 2005 ................................................................................................ 33 5.2 Geologic Units .............................................................................................................. 33 5.3 Soils............................................................................................................................... 33 5.4 Seismic Hazard Areas ................................................................................................... 34 5.5 Landslide Hazard Areas ................................................................................................ 34 5.6 Erosion and Sedimentation Hazard Areas .................................................................... 35 5.7 Aquifer Recharge Areas ................................................................................................ 36 5.8 Streams .......................................................................................................................... 36 5.9 Flood Hazard Areas ...................................................................................................... 38 5.10 Shoreline Modifications ................................................................................................ 38 5.10.1 Shoreline Armoring .............................................................................................. 39 5.10.2 Docks, Piers, and Over-Water Structures ............................................................. 40 6. NEARSHORE BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION .................................................... 40 6.1 Wetlands ....................................................................................................................... 40 6.2 Critical Fish and Wildlife Areas ................................................................................... 40 6.2.1 Marine Riparian Zones ......................................................................................... 41 6.2.2 Banks and Bluffs ................................................................................................... 41 November 2009 Page i City of Shoreline - Shoreline Inventory and Characterization 6.2.3 Beaches and Backshore ......................................................................................... 41 6.2.4 Flats ....................................................................................................................... 42 6.2.5 Eelgrass Meadows ................................................................................................ 43 6.2.6 Kelp Forests .......................................................................................................... 44 6.2.7 Priority Habitats and Species ................................................................................ 44 7. ASSESSMENT OF SHORELINE FUNCTIONS AND OPPORTUNITY AREAS ............ 48 7.1 Shoreline Ecological Functions .................................................................................... 48 7.2 Programmatic Restoration Opportunities ..................................................................... 53 7.3 Site-Specific Restoration Opportunities ....................................................................... 54 7.3.1 Segment A ............................................................................................................. 56 7.3.2 Segment B ............................................................................................................. 57 7.3.3 Segment C ............................................................................................................. 57 7.3.4 Segment D ............................................................................................................. 57 7.3.5 Segment E ............................................................................................................. 58 8. DATA GAPS ......................................................................................................................... 58 9. SUMMARY 59 10. BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................. 62 List of Tables Table 1. Shoreline Planning Segments .......................................................................................... 3 Table 2. Percentages of Existing, Allowed and Planned Land Use and Impervious Surfaces by Segment in Puget Sound Shoreline Planning Area ............................................................... 25 Table 3. Shoreline Sediment Sources and Mobility ..................................................................... 32 Table 4. Current and Historic Beach Feeding Sources/Erosion and Accretion Areas in City of Shoreline (Drift Cell SN-3) ................................................................................................... 33 Table 5. ShoreZone Classification by Segment (WDNR, 2001) ................................................. 42 Table 6. Forage Fish Species and Presence by Shoreline Segment ............................................. 46 Table 7. Summary of Ecological Functions .................................................................................. 49 Table 8. Summary of Shoreline Functions and Programmatic Restoration Opportunities .......... 53 Table 9. Summary of Site-Specific Opportunities and Projects for Public Access and Restoration ............................................................................................................................................... 55 Table 10. Shoreline Segment Summary Matrix, City of Shoreline ............................................. 61 List of Maps Map 1. Shoreline Planning Area Map 1A. Shoreline Planning Area Map 1B. Shoreline Planning Area Map 1C. Shoreline Planning Area Map 1D. Shoreline Planning Area Map 1E. Shoreline Planning Area List of Appendices APPENDIX A: Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) ShoreZone Inventory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notice of Intent Construction Stormwater General Permit
    Notice of Intent Construction Stormwater General Permit Application Type: X New Renewal Permit Number: NOI 21167 : I. Contact Information Permittee Honorific: First Name: Kelsea Last Name: Peterson Organization Name: Hoffman Construction Company of Washington Title: Mailing Address: 600 Stewart St Ste 1000 City: Seattle State: WA Zip Code: 98101-1225 Email: [email protected] Primary Phone: 206-327-1167 Secondary Phone: UBI Number: Site Contact Honorific: First Name: Kelsea Last Name: Peterson Organization Name: Hoffman Construction Company of Washington Title: Mailing Address: 600 Stewart St Ste 1000 City: Seattle State: WA Zip Code: 98101-1225 Email: [email protected] Primary Phone: 206-327-1167 Secondary Phone: UBI Number: Site Owner Honorific: First Name: Michael Last Name: Romero Organization Name: Shoreline School District Capital Projects Title: Mailing Address: 18560 1st Ave NE City: Shoreline State: WA Zip Code: 98155-2148 Email: [email protected] Primary Phone: 206-393-4204 Secondary Phone: UBI Number: II. Electronic Discharge Monitoring Reporting You must submit monthly discharge monitoring reports using Ecology’s Electronic Discharge Monitoring Reporting (WQWebDMR) system. To sign up for WQWebDMR, or to register a new site, go to ecology.wa.gov/Regulations- Permits/Permits-certifications/Stormwater-general-permits, and click on the “Construction Stormwater” link. You will find information on WQWebDMR under the “WQWebDMR and PARIS” link on the right-hand side. If you are unable to submit your DMRs electronically, you may contact Ecology to request a waiver. Ecology will generally only grant waiver requests to those permittees without internet access. Only a permittee or representative, designated in writing, may request access to or a waiver from WQWebDMR.
    [Show full text]
  • Landslides, Tsunamis, and Possible Hazardous Material Releases
    Element 6 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Supporting Analysis Natural Environment Element Supporting Analysis BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT Shoreline’s environment is comprised of both natural and built features. Puget Sound vistas, mature trees, vegetation, streams, wetlands, lakes, and tidelands are just some aspects of the natural environment that Shoreline citizens value. The relationships between these features, development, natural processes, and the condition of the resulting environment have profound impacts on the quality of life in Shoreline. Shoreline is not a pristine landscape, but the very name of the city reflects the importance of the natural environment to community identity. Preserving the quality of the environment depends on government, business, and individual decisions; and coordinated actions to minimize the adverse environmental impacts that can occur during development/redevelopment, or as a result of previous practices. Environmental Conditions Shoreline is a community that developed primarily as a suburban residential area with an associated mix of commercial centers, parks, schools, and natural areas. Natural areas are comprised of the Puget Sound shoreline, bluffs, steep slopes, ravines, natural reserves, wetlands, streams, lakes, native growth, and stands of mature trees. These areas are found on both private and public property, including single-family residential lots, and parks. Portions of Shoreline contain the following environmentally critical areas: geological and flood hazard areas, streams, wetlands, and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. The city does not contain any known critical aquifer recharge areas that supply potable water. Drinking water comes from surface systems, which originate in the Cascade Mountains and flow predominantly through the Tolt River, and is distributed by the Shoreline Water District and Seattle Public Utilities.
    [Show full text]
  • HIDDEN LAKE Sewer Improvement Project
    HIDDEN LAKE Sewer Improvement Project NEWSLETTER SUMMER 2006 Construction underway in Boeing Creek Park New pipe will reduce overflows to Puget Sound ing County’s Hidden Lake Sewer Storage pipe Improvement Project will increase sections are K sewer system reliability and protect stabilized in public health and the environment by reducing place before overflows into Puget Sound. additional Workers guide a pipe sections are section as the crane King County has hired Frank Coluccio added. lowers it into the trench. Construction Company, or FCCC, to build three projects, shown on the map on Page 3. Construction is expected to run from summer A secondary Why do we 2006 to early 2009. suspension system is used need facilities Construction in Boeing Creek to fit the pipe in Boeing Park complete by late 2007 segments together. Creek Park? Boeing Creek Park will remain open to n King County’s projects to the public during a sewer improvement replace aging sewers will construction project now underway in protect Puget Sound by limiting Shoreline. A new 12-foot-diameter overflows. underground storage pipe is being built County crews are asking park users to obey trail detour signs and keep pets n Funding from the county will in the park that will temporarily store enable the City of Shoreline to up to 500,000 gallons of wastewater on leashes. Some areas are fenced off make future park improvements. during large storms. Also being for public safety. Pedestrians, runners built are two underground concrete and bicyclists should take extra care n The City of Shoreline has made vaults to control flows through and watch for construction vehicles improvements to help flood control and activity.
    [Show full text]
  • HIDDEN LAKE PAID Sewer Improvement Project SEATTLE WA PERMIT NO
    0701HLakeNews.indd, Spread 1 of 2 - Pages (4, 1) 1/17/07 9:27 AM PRESORTED FIRST CLASS U.S. POSTAGE HIDDEN LAKE PAID Sewer Improvement Project SEATTLE WA PERMIT NO. 836 NEWSLETTER WINTER 2006/2007 Collaboration Hidden Lake Pump Station with Ronald & Sewer Improvement Project Wastewater CONSTRUCTION MOVES FORWARD! District ing County’s Hidden Lake Sewer Improvement Project will increase sewer improves CONSTRUCTION system reliability and protect public health and the environment by reducing sewer service MOVES FORWARD! Koverflows to Puget Sound. The county’s contractor, Frank Coluccio Construction The Ronald Wastewater District Company (FCCC) continues to make progress on all three projects, shown on the map (Ronald) collects wastewater on page 3. Construction is expected to continue until early 2009. Winter 2006/2007 from homes and businesses in Shoreline and delivers it to King County’s regional Boeing Creek Trunk Sewer conveyance and treatment Replacement underway in system. Ronald Wastewater District Richmond Beach has operated for the last 40 Crews installing new sewer pipe and years. For the Hidden Lake manholes for the Boeing Creek Trunk Sewer Improvement Project, Sewer have progressed from the King County and Ronald Richmond Beach Pump Station south worked closely to design local to the intersection of Northwest 196th and regional sewer connections Street and 23rd Avenue Northwest. that improved the capacity and A temporary patch has been placed reliability of both systems. on the road. Crews will pave As a result, the county’s contractor the final full-width overlay and is replacing some of Ronald’s (Continued from page one) widened asphalt shoulder when manholes and sewer pipes while Final paving will occur by the summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Hidden Lake Study
    Council Meeting Date: September 8, 2014 Agenda Item: 8(a) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF SHORELINE, WASHINGTON AGENDA TITLE: Hidden Lake Management Feasibility Study DEPARTMENT: Public Works PRESENTED BY: Brian Landau, Surface Water and Environmental Services Manager ACTION: ____ Ordinance ____ Resolution ____ Motion __X_ Discussion ____ Public Hearing PROBLEM/ISSUE STATEMENT: Hidden Lake is a stormwater facility in Boeing Creek that was constructed by King County in 1996. This facility has the highest operational and maintenance cost of any stormwater facility in the City. Since 2002, the material removal costs for the facility has exceeded $600,000. On August 5, 2013, the City Council discussed this issue and authorized staff to proceed with the Hidden Lake Management Feasibility study. This staff report provides the results of that study. The specific project objectives for the Hidden Lake Management Plan Feasibility Study are to: Identify alternatives that will reduce the net maintenance cost for managing Hidden Lake, Maintain or improve water quality in Hidden Lake and Boeing Creek, and Identify capital projects or strategies that could be incorporated in the City’s next 6-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to achieve the above plan objectives. Additionally, other goals in the development of alternative strategies include: Avoiding significant degradation of the area’s aesthetics, Improving ecological conditions., and Maintaining the recreational benefits of Shoreview Park. Four management alternatives were identified for final consideration based on meeting the goals for the study and relative cost considerations: Alternative 1 - Maintain Dredging (Status Quo) Alternative 2 - Cease Dredging Alternative 3 - Remove Dam Alternative 4 - Upstream Flow Control RESOURCE/FINANCIAL IMPACT: The 10-year financial impact of the management alternatives under final consideration to the Surface Water Utility and General fund range from $25,000 to over $10 Million.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Pets, Love at First Sight Third Annual Pet Appreciation Issue Photo by Julie Clegg / Julieclegg.Com
    FREE! ISSAQUAHCONNECTIONS HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY NEWS www.issaquahhighlands.com | facebook.com/issaquahhighlands July 2015 Our Pets, Love at First Sight Third Annual Pet Appreciation Issue Photo by Julie Clegg / julieclegg.com WHAT’S INSIDE? POSTAL PATRON POSTAL 4 Feature: Pet Appreciation 17 Living Green ECRWSS 6 Highlands Council 17 Volunteer of the Month 7 Highlands Day 19 Dog Fun Facts 8 Summer Movies 21 Sportshound 9 Blakely Hall Art 22 Interior Design Issaquah, WA 98029 WA Issaquah, 10 Highlands Fiber Network 23 Arts & Entertainment PERMIT NO. 83 NO. PERMIT 2550 NE Park Drive Park NE 2550 11 Doing Business 24 Fitness & Health ISSAQUAH, WA ISSAQUAH, U.S. POSTAGE PAID POSTAGE U.S. 12 IHCA News 25 City News PRSRT STD PRSRT 13 IHCA Landscape 27 Culture Through Cuisine 14 What’s Happening 2 • July 2015 Issaquah Highlands Connections #1 Agent/Office in Issaquah Highlands - Over 300 HOUSES SOLD I.H! Forest Ridge Stunner! Expertly Upgraded Townhome! Parkside Craftsman Charmer Stunning End-Unit Townhome Matt sold for $689,500 Matt sold at $475,000 Matt listed at $513,000 Matt sold at $454,280 SELLER SAVED SELLER SAVED SELLER SAVED SELLER SAVED $13,790 $9,500 $10,260 $9,086 Turn-Key End Unit Townhome Park-Side Craftsman Charmer! End–Unit in Concord Commons! Wisteria Park Stunner! Matt sold at $455,000 Matt sold at $606,000 Matt sold at $462,500 Matt sold at $790,000 1781 SELLER28th Ave NE SAVED Sold $9,100 for $690,000 SELLER SAVED $12,120 SELLER SAVED $9,250 SELLER SAVED $15,800 THE PREMIERE, TOP-NOTCH LISTING PROGRAM FOR SUPERIOR RESULTS Better marketing; Better contract negotiation; Better results statistics across the board.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors Report
    Salmon and Steelhead Habitat Limiting Factors Report for the CEDAR – SAMMAMISH BASIN (Water Resource Inventory Area 8) Prepared by: John Kerwin Washington Conservation Commission Olympia, Washington September 2001 “…salmon are among the oldest natives of the Pacific Northwest, and over millions of years they learned to inhabit and use nearly all the region’s freshwater, estuarine and marine habitats. …From a mountaintop where an eagle carries a salmon carcass to feed its young, out to the distant oceanic waters of the California Current and the Alaska Gyre, the salmon have penetrated the Northwest to an extent unmatched by any other animal. They are like silver threads woven deep into the fabric of the Northwest Ecosystem. The decline of salmon to the brink of extinction is a clear sign of serious problems. The beautiful tapestry that the Northwesterners call home is unraveling; its silver threads are frayed and broken.” Excerpt from: Salmon Without Rivers: a History of the Pacific Salmon Crisis. By Jim Lichatowich, 1999. Island Press 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Habitat Limiting Factors and Reconnaissance Assessment Report would not have been possible without the support and cooperation of many individuals, groups and agencies. The members of the Lake Washington Technical Committee are gratefully thanked for their major contributions. This committee is an interjurisdictional and agency team comprised of individuals with technical backgrounds in ecology, hydrology, fisheries biology, fluvial geomorphology, water quality, and engineering. The Committee's expertise and familiarity with the habitats within the subwatersheds of Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 8 and their interest and willingness to share their knowledge contributed substantially to this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Shoreline History
    Appendix A Overview of Shoreline History prepared as part of the Survey and Inventory of Historic Resources In the City of Shoreline Cloantha Copass King County Historic Preservation Program September 30, 1996 Introduction The City of Shoreline today is characterized primarily by its extensive single-family residential neighborhoods, punctuated by commercial developments which tend concentrated along primary roads. While this typical suburban land use pattern is usually associated in the Pacific Northwest with post-World War II development, the roots of Shoreline‟s present land use patterns reach back to the turn of the century. This paper highlights the city‟s historical development patterns through the late 1950s, and identifies buildings and sites associated with the community‟s growth and development. Historically, the name Shoreline has referred to an area extending from 85th Avenue NE, which was the northern boundary of the City of Seattle until annexations pushed the boundary northward in the 1940s and 1950s, to the King - Snohomish County line, and from Puget Sound to Lake Washington. The City of Lake Forest Park incorporated in 1961; it covers the northeastern part of the area historically was considered Shoreline.1 This paper focuses on the geographic area which incorporated as the City of Shoreline in 1995, as well as the areas of unincorporated King County between Shoreline and Lake Forest Park to the east. This paper identifies and discusses five major phases in Shoreline‟s growth, each characterized by particular transportation networks and development patterns. The five phases are: • Historic Native American Presence (until c1880) • Railroad and Mosquito Fleet (1880-1905) • The Interurban and the North Trunk Road (1906-1929) • The Great Depression and World War II (1930-1945) • Building the Automobile Suburbs (1946-1956) The first section outlines the use of the area by Native peoples prior to settlement by non- native populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Members President -Mike Jacobs Past History of the Innis Arden Club Vice President -David Fosmire Family Salmon Barbecue
    INNIS ARDEN CLUB, INC. BOX 60038 RICHMOND BEACH, WA 98160 July, 2007 On the Web at: www.innisarden.com Board Members President -Mike Jacobs Past History of the Innis Arden Club Vice President -David Fosmire Family Salmon Barbecue Secretary -Shannon Martsolf The Barbecue originated on the sands of Richmond Beach (at the Treasurer -Pat French mouth of Boeing Creek) where the George Etsell family and some Activities -Tracy Landboe of their neighbors held a salmon barbecue on the 4 th of July. Each Building and Remodel - year more Innis Arden neighbors asked to be included until atten- dance became so large in 1967 that the Clubhouse was first used. Robert Allen Tickets were $1.00 for adults, .85 for teens and nothing for other Clubhouse -Harley O’Neil children. The price of salmon was .96 per pound and the men of the Grounds -Kathi Peterson committee and cooks did the filleting at the clubhouse the morning Reserves -Brian Dodd of the event. That year attendance was 119, and the date was changed to a Wednesday. In 1973, record attendance was achieved with 409 neighbors attending. Do any residents have Salmon Bar- becue pictures from the good ol’ days? Below are a couple of Inside this issue: ‘modern’ shots: Salmon Barbecue History 1 Agenda for August Meeting 2 Blockwatch Condolences More Innis Arden Grads 3 New Neighbors June Meeting Minutes 4 July Meeting Minutes 5 “No Trespassing” signs 6 This year’s Barbecue is sched- available uled for September 9th (see Salmon BBQ Registration 7 page 7). Bulletin Board 1 Agenda for the August 14, 2007 7:00 PM Board Meeting Blockwatch Reminder 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Highlands Forum Process Richard P
    INCIDENTAL PAPER Seminar on Intelligence, Command, and Control The Highlands Forum Process Richard P. O’Neill Guest Presentations, Spring 2001 C. Kenneth Allard, Cheryl J. Roby, Nicholas Rostow, Richard P. O’Neill, Harry D. Raduege, Jr., Thomas S. Moorman, Jr., Thomas R. Wilson, James M. Simon, Jr., Toshi Yoshihara December 2001 Program on Information Resources PolicyResources Policy Center for Information Policy Research Harvard University The Program on Information Resources Policy is jointly sponsored by Harvard University and the Center for Information Policy Research. Chairman Managing Director Anthony G. Oettinger John C. B. LeGates Copyright © 2001 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. Not to be reproduced in any form without written consent from the Program on Information Resources Policy, Harvard University, Maxwell Dworkin 125, 33 Oxford Street, Cambridge MA 02138. (617) 495-4114 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.pirp.harvard.edu ISBN 1-879716-76-3 I-01-3 December 2001 PROGRAM ON INFORMATION RESOURCES POLICY Harvard University Center for Information Policy Research Affiliates Anonymous Startup Research Institute of Telecommuni- AT&T Corp. cations and Economics (Japan) Australian Telecommunications Users Samara Associates Group Sonexis BellSouth Corp. Strategy Assistance Services The Boeing Company United States Government: Booz•Allen & Hamilton, Inc. Department of Commerce Center for Excellence in Education National Telecommunications and CIRCIT at RMIT (Australia) Information Administration Commission of the European Department of Defense Communities National Defense University Critical Path Department of Health and Human CyraCom International Services DACOM (Korea) National Library of Medicine ETRI (Korea) Department of the Treasury Fujitsu Research Institute (Japan) Office of the Comptroller of the Hanaro Telecom Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Volunteer SALMON WATCHER PROGRAM in the Lake Washington Watershed and Central Puget Sound Drainages
    2001 Volunteer SALMON WATCHER PROGRAM in the Lake Washington Watershed and Central Puget Sound Drainages June 2002 Jennifer Vanderhoof, King County Water and Land Resources Division King County Water and Land Resources Division, in cooperation with: Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish Watershed Forum Central Puget Sound Watershed Forum King Conservation District Snohomish County Surface Water Management Bellevue Stream Team Cities of Issaquah, Kirkland, Redmond, Renton, Seattle, and Woodinville Alternate formats are available upon request by contacting 206-296-7592 (Voice) or 800-833-6388 (TTY). SUMMARY In 1996, the Bellevue Stream Team, King County Water and Land Resources Division, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, the Snohomish County Surface Water Management Division, and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife began a jointly coordinated volunteer spawning survey program in the Lake Washington Watershed (all waters draining through the Ballard Locks). In 1997, the program evolved into the Salmon Watcher Program as it is today and has been conducted annually since. The purpose of the program is to document the distribution of spawning adult salmon throughout the basin via an active public outreach and education program, and subsequently consolidate all the information into a single resource (this report). These data can be used by policy makers and the public to improve how aquatic resources are managed, to protect salmon and trout species, and to enhance their habitat. For the 2001 program, 219 volunteers surveyed 181sites on 68 streams throughout the Lake Washington Watershed and Central Puget Sound streams from late August 2001 to January 2002. Because volunteers collect the data in this program, the agencies are able to obtain information from far more locations than would otherwise be possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticides in Washington State Sediments Pilot Study
    Data Report Pilot Study of Pesticides in Washington State Stream Sediments December 2018 AGR PUB 102-741 (N/12/18) Pesticides in Washington State Sediments Pilot Study This report is available on the Department of Agriculture’s website: http://agr.wa.gov/FP/Pubs/NaturalResourcesAssessmentPubs.aspx Contact Information: Lead Author: Abigail Nickelson Natural Resource Assessment Section Phone: (509) 895-9338 21 N 1st Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 [email protected] Communications Director: Hector Castro Phone: (360) 902-1815 P.O. Box 42560 Olympia, WA 98504-2560 [email protected] Any use of product or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the author or the Department of Agriculture. Do you need this publication in a different format? Contact the WSDA receptionist at (360) 902-1976 or TTY (800) 833-6388 1 Pesticides in Washington State Sediments Pilot Study Pilot Study of Pesticides in Washington State Stream Sediments Abigail Nickelson Natural Resources Assessment Section Washington State Department of Agriculture Olympia, Washington December 2018 2 Pesticides in Washington State Sediments Pilot Study Acknowledgements Brandi Lubliner, Washington State Department of Ecology for review and cooperative agreement coordinator Rich Sheibley and United States Geological Survey personnel for sample collection Stormwater Action Monitoring, a stormwater monitoring program, for study collaboration Manchester Environmental Laboratory for sample analysis King County Environmental Laboratory for sample analysis Yakama Nation: Elizabeth Sanchey, Environmental Management Program Manager for sampling assistance and technical expertise The Washington State Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Assessment Section staff including; Matthew Bischof, Joel Demory, George Tuttle, and Margaret Drennan for internal peer-review of this data report.
    [Show full text]