DOCSLIB.ORG

Mon Toring of Toxic Contaminants in the San Francisco Bay-Delta

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mon Toring of Toxic Contaminants in the San Francisco Bay-Delta Aquatic Habitat Institute MON TORING OF TOXIC CONTAMINANTS IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY-DELTA: A CRITICAL REVIEW, EMPHASIZING SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL TREND MONITORING DAVID J.H. PHILLIPS Aquatic Habitat Institute, 180 Richmond Field Station, 1301 South 46th. Street, Richmond, CA 94804, USA. December 980 Son Francisco Bay - Delta CONTENTS Acknowledgements (i1 Preface (ii) I. Introduction 1 A. Contaminants in the Estuary: Historical and Existing Concerns 1 9. Management Issues Related to Contaminants 5 C. Goals and Contents of This Report 13 II. Available Methods for Monitoring Toxic Contaminants in Estuaries 16 A. Alternative Approaches: Water, Sediment, Biota 16 9. Bio-monitoring Techniques: Early Development 23 C. Improvements and Important Concepts 24 D. Review of Bio-monitoring Organisms 28 E. Conclusions on Bio-monitoring Techniques 46 111. Toxic Contaminants of Greatest Concern in the Estuary 47 IV. Regional Monitoring of Toxic Contaminants in the Estuary 53 A. Introduction 53 9. Regional Monitoring of Toxic Contaminants in Ambient Waters 56 C. Regional Monitoring of Toxic Contaminants in Sediments 75 D. Regional Monitoring of Toxic Contaminants in Biota 84 V. Local Monitoring of Toxic Contaminants in the Estuary 13 A. Introduction 13 8. Monitoring of Contaminant Concentrations in Effluents 16 C. Bioassays of Effluents 24 D. Studies Close to Effluent Outfalls 28 E. The Case for Local Bio-accumulation Studies 39 VI. The Monitoring of Toxicants in Target Species and Food Chains 44 VII. The Proposed Monitoring Program 48 A. General Description of the Proposed Program 148 6. Selection of Study Sites 158 C. Species to be Employed in Bio-monitoring Studies 168 D. Sampling Details 172 E. Contaminants to be Analyzed 177 F. Sample Collection; Compositing; Archival; QNQC 178 G. Approximate Program Costs 180 H. Research Needs in Addition to the Proposed Program 183 I. Monitoring to Satisfy Management Needs 186 Vlll. Literature Cited 188 Appendix 1. Scope of Work for State Board Contract Appendix 2. Contaminants of Concern in the San Francisco Estuary Disclosure Statement This report was prepared through contracts with the California State Water Resources Control Board and the Bay Area Dischargers Association. Contract number 5-290-120-0, as amended by contracts 5-290-120-1 and 5-290-120-2, between the State Water Resources Control Board and the Aquatic Habitat Institute provided a total of US$32,500 for the preparation of this report. An unnumbered contract dated 26 February 1988 between the Bay Area Dischargers Association and the Aquatic Habitat Institute provided a further US$12,500 for this task. Acknowledgements My colleagues at the Aquatic Habitat Institute contributed significantly to this report, both in terms of time and talent. Margaret Johnston kept the Institute funded and running tolerably smoothly; provided a working environment appropriate to the completion of the report; and also contributed her insight and experience to drafts of the document. Andy Gunther contributed valuable suggestions on drafts, and time and talent in the production of figures. Jay Davis provided data on point source discharges, employed in the section on local monitoring. Kathy Kramer contributed general support and also aided in the preparation of data and figures. Todd Featherston was a font of knowledge on computer-related problems. Liz Hartman assisted with general administrative requirements. Dr. Susan Anderson of the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board acted as Project Officer for work related to this report on behalf of the State Water Resources Control Board. The considerable input, hard work and dedication of Br. Anderson are acknowledged. Technical discussions with Bob Spies of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Mike Martin and Mark Stephenson of the California Department of Fish 8 Game, Sam Luoma of the US Geological Survey, Brian Melzian of EPA Region IX, and Phil Rainbow of Queen Mary College (University of London, UK) contributed measurably to the final product. Bob Spies also contributed to the development of the list of “contaminants of greatest concern” in the estuary, discussed in section Ill of the report. Ed Long and Donald MacDonald of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, provided valuable assistance with the preparation of figures. These scientists are owed my gratitude for their unselfish provision of their valuable time and talent. I am grateful also to several authors (Jim Kuwabara, Don Smith, and others) who agreed to my use of as yet unpublished data in the preparation of this report. I also wish to thank my wife Lee for her continued and continual support and her contributions to proof-reading in particular. Several reviewers external to AH1 contributed valuable suggestions on the initial draft of this report. These included Susan Anderson, Tom Mumley, Mike Carlin, Chris Foe, Jerry Bruns, Val Connor, staff and consultants of the Bay Area Dischargers Association, several staff associated with the Bay Area League of Industrial Association, Pete Chadwick, Bill Davoren, Joel Hedgpeth, Perry Herrgesell, Diane Knudsen, Dennis Lemley, Ed Long, Sam Luoma, Mike Martin, Brian Melzian, Harry Ohlendorf, Pete Phillips, Mike Rugg, Bob Spies, and Mark Stephenson. I am grateful for their time and effort. Apple Computer Inc. provided a grant of their excellent equipment to the Institute; this has permitted the incorporation of high-quality graphics in the report and has also immeasurably streamlined its production, in addition to summarily dragging the author into the 20th. century, The preparation of this report was made possible through the provision of funds by the California State Water Resources Control Board under agreement 5-290-120-0 with the Aquatic Habitat Institute, and by the provision of additional funds by the Bay Area Dischargers Association (BADA). The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the individuals acknowledged above or those of the funding agencies. Preface This report is produced in specific response to an agreement between the Aquatic Habitat Institute and the State Water Resources Control Board, with funding from the latter and the Bay Area Dischargers Association. It concerns principally one specific aspect of monitoring in the San Francisco Bay and Delta: the monitoring of the abundances, distributions and bio-availabilities of toxic contaminants. The report should be read within the context of the broader issues facing the estuary and its protection. The State Hearing process presently underway will provide recommendations on the control of pollutants in the Bay and Delta, and perhaps on the control of any impacts of Delta inflows on pollutants. The San Francisco Estuary Project of the EPA National Estuary Program is also underway, and is in the process of reviewing the state of the estuary and its resources through the production of Status and Trends Reports and other documents. AH1 staff have been intimately involved in these projects. Every attempt has been made to reduce overlap between work undertaken by Institute staff for the various projects, and to build upon previous work. In this fashion, it is to be hoped that a cohesive program for the monitoring of contaminants and their effects can be implemented in the Bay and Delta (and its upstream catchment), and that this program can become part of a broader effort to protect the resources of the estuary. The monitoring program proposed here is not therefore a stand-alone product, but relates to these broader needs to protect the estuary. While it is hoped that the program proposed here will become the mainstay of studies of the abundance, distributions and bio- availabilities of toxic contaminants in the estuary, much remains to be done through the State Hearing process, the San Francisco Estuary Project, and other forums of this kind if the estuary is to be adequately protected in future. (ii) 1. INTRODUCTION A. Contaminants in the Estuary: Historical and Existing Concerns It is widely recognised that the San Francisco Bay-Delta Estuary has been radically altered by human activities (Nichols et a/., 1986; Wright and Phillips, 1988). The great majority of these impacts occurred subsequent to the arrival of the Spanish in 1769. Thus, for example, the increasing catchment population and industrialization of the margins of the Bay have caused problems with waste disposal, which began to impact resources in the estuary as early as the 1930s (Phillips, 1987). Large areas of historic marshland have been lost to agricultural, industrial and urban development, and the margins of the estuary have been extensively altered. Hydraulic mining in the Gold Rush period deposited huge quantities of sediment in the Bay, and also introduced trace metals such as mercury (Wright and Phillips, 1988). Exotic species have been introduced and have altered the ecological balance of the Estuary. Water diversions from the Delta for irrigation and potable use in central and southern California have affected estuarine hydrodynamics (Nichols et a/., 1986). Several of these effects are relevant to concerns over pollution of the Bay and Delta. Early impacts due to the wash-down of sediments from the gold mining activities were accompanied by increases in mercury deposition in the estuary. The loss of wetlands and modifications of estuarine channels and margins have changed the hydrodynamics of the system, and may have exacerbated the impacts of introduced pollutants.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 0 5 10 15 20 Miles Μ and Statewide Resources Office
    Woodland RD Name RD Number Atlas Tract 2126 5 !"#$ Bacon Island 2028 !"#$80 Bethel Island BIMID Bishop Tract 2042 16 ·|}þ Bixler Tract 2121 Lovdal Boggs Tract 0404 ·|}þ113 District Sacramento River at I Street Bridge Bouldin Island 0756 80 Gaging Station )*+,- Brack Tract 2033 Bradford Island 2059 ·|}þ160 Brannan-Andrus BALMD Lovdal 50 Byron Tract 0800 Sacramento Weir District ¤£ r Cache Haas Area 2098 Y o l o ive Canal Ranch 2086 R Mather Can-Can/Greenhead 2139 Sacramento ican mer Air Force Chadbourne 2034 A Base Coney Island 2117 Port of Dead Horse Island 2111 Sacramento ¤£50 Davis !"#$80 Denverton Slough 2134 West Sacramento Drexler Tract Drexler Dutch Slough 2137 West Egbert Tract 0536 Winters Sacramento Ehrheardt Club 0813 Putah Creek ·|}þ160 ·|}þ16 Empire Tract 2029 ·|}þ84 Fabian Tract 0773 Sacramento Fay Island 2113 ·|}þ128 South Fork Putah Creek Executive Airport Frost Lake 2129 haven s Lake Green d n Glanville 1002 a l r Florin e h Glide District 0765 t S a c r a m e n t o e N Glide EBMUD Grand Island 0003 District Pocket Freeport Grizzly West 2136 Lake Intake Hastings Tract 2060 l Holland Tract 2025 Berryessa e n Holt Station 2116 n Freeport 505 h Honker Bay 2130 %&'( a g strict Elk Grove u Lisbon Di Hotchkiss Tract 0799 h lo S C Jersey Island 0830 Babe l Dixon p s i Kasson District 2085 s h a King Island 2044 S p Libby Mcneil 0369 y r !"#$5 ·|}þ99 B e !"#$80 t Liberty Island 2093 o l a Lisbon District 0307 o Clarksburg Y W l a Little Egbert Tract 2084 S o l a n o n p a r C Little Holland Tract 2120 e in e a e M Little Mandeville
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy
    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Programmatic Environmental Impact Report
    Water Hyacinth Control Program FINAL Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Volume I – Chapters 1 to 7 November 30, 2009 A program for effective control of Water Hyacinth in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and its tributaries. Copies of this Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report in hard copy form, or on computer compact disc (CD), can be obtained from the California Department of Boating and Waterways. To request a report copy, please contact: Ms. Terri Ely Aquatic Weed Program California Department of Boating and Waterways 2000 Evergreen Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, California 95815 (916) 263-8138 [email protected] Cover photo: March 14, 2008, by NewPoint Group, Inc., of the Wheeler Island Duck Club, at Honker Bay. [PARTIAL] Water Hyacinth Control Program Water Hyacinth Control Program A program for effective control of Water Hyacinth in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and its tributaries. FINAL Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Volume I – Chapters 1 to 7 November 30, 2009 Prepared by: The California Department of Boating and Waterways With Technical Assistance from: NewPoint Group, Inc. 2555 Third Street, Suite 215 Sacramento, California 95818 (916) 442-0508 www.newpointgroup.com ~----Pei:at f~m.A; _ _,__,..._... AniJru--~- ' --sepat Table of Contents Volume I – Chapters 1 to 7 Page Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................... AA-1 Executive Summary.......................................................................... ES-1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phlebobranchia of CTAW
    PHLEBOBRANCHIA PHLEBOBRANCHIA The suborder Phlebobranchia (order Enterogona) is characterised by having unpaired gonads present only on the same side of the body as the gut. As in Stolidobranchia, the body is not divided into different sections (such as thorax, abdomen and posterior abdomen) as the gut is folded up in the parietal body wall outside the pharynx and the large branchial sac occupies the whole length of the body. Usually the branchial sac (which is flat, without folds) has internal longitudinal vessels (although only vestiges remain in Agneziidae). Epicardial sacs do not persist in adults as they do in Aplousobranchia, although excretory vesicles (nephrocytes) embedded in the body wall over the gut are known to originate from the embryonic epicardium in Ascidiidae and Corellidae. Most phlebobranchs are solitary. However, Plurellidae Kott, 1973 includes both solitary and colonial forms, and Perophoridae Giard, 1872 are all colonial. Replication in Perophoridae is from ectodermal epithelium (rather than endodermal or mesodermal tissue the mesodermal tissue of the vascular stolon (rather than the endodermal tissue as in most as in Aplousobranchia). The process of replication has not been investigated in Plurellidae. Phlebobranch taxa occurring in Australia are documented in Kott (1985). Family level taxa are characterised principally by the size and form of the branchial sac including the number of branchial vessels and form of the stigmata; the form, size and position of the gonads; and the habit (colonial or solitary) of the taxon. Berrill (1950) has discussed problems in assessing the phylogeny of Perophoridae. References Berrill, N.J. (1950). The Tunicata. Ray Soc. Publs 133: 1–354 Giard, A.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Delta Dredged Material Placement Sites
    Summary of Delta Dredged Material Placement Sites Capacity Overall Map Dredge Material Placement Active Types of Material Years in Remaining Capacity ID Site (Yes/No) Owner/Operator Accepted Service (CY) (CY) Notes 1 S1 2 S4 3 S7 4 S9 5 S11 Port of Sacramento S12 (Department of 6 1,710,000 3, 5 South Island Prospect Island Interior Bureau of Land Management?) 7 S13 S14 8 USACE N/A 3 Grand Island Placement Site S16 9 USACE 3,000,000 3 Rio Vista Placement Site DWR, Mega S19 10 Sands, Port of 20,000,000 3 Decker Island Placement Site Sacramento S20 Port of Sacramento 11 1,000,000 3, 5 Augusta Pit Placement Site (DWR?) S31 12 Port of Sacramento Placement Port of Sacramento Site Reclamation S32 13 Districts 999 and (six segments) 900 S35 DOW Chemical 14 Montezuma Hills Placement 890,000 3 Company Site 15 SX Sacramento Muni 1 Capacity Overall Map Dredge Material Placement Active Types of Material Years in Remaining Capacity ID Site (Yes/No) Owner/Operator Accepted Service (CY) (CY) Notes Utility District Sherman Lake (Sherman 16 USACE 3,000,000 3 Island?) 17 Montezuma Wetlands Project Montezuma LLC Montezuma Wetlands 18 Montezuma LLC Rehandling Site Expanded Scour Pond Dredge material 19 Placement Site (also called Yes DWR according to WDR #R5- 250,000 1, 2, 3,4 Sherman Island?) 2004-0061 Port of Stockton McCormack Pit Placement maintenance material 20 Site (also called Sherman Yes DWR only 250,000 3,4 Island?) WDR R5-2003-0145 Proposed Iron House Levy repair and 21 Jersey Island Placement Site Restoration 3 Sanitation District maintenance
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Patterns in Ascidians Concerning Have Been Patchily
    Larval settlement behaviour in six gregarious ascidians in relation to adult 2 distribution 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Marc Rius1,2,*, George M. Branch2, Charles L. Griffiths1,2, Xavier Turon3 18 19 20 1 Centre for Invasion Biology, Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, 21 Rondebosch 7701, South Africa 22 23 2 Marine Biology Research Centre, Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, 24 Rondebosch 7701, South Africa 25 26 3 Center for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB, CSIC), Accés Cala St. Francesc 14, 27 17300 Blanes (Girona), Spain 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 * Corresponding author: Marc Rius 35 Centre for Invasion Biology, Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, 36 Rondebosch 7701, South Africa 37 E-mail: [email protected] 38 Telephone: +27 21 650 4939 39 Fax: +27 21 650 3301 40 41 Running head: Settlement patterns of gregarious ascidians 42 43 44 1 45 ABSTRACT 46 Settlement influences the distribution and abundance of many marine organisms, 47 although the relative roles of abiotic and biotic factors influencing settlement are poorly 48 understood. Species that aggregate often owe this to larval behaviour, and we ask 49 whether this predisposes ascidians to becoming invasive, by increasing their capacity to 50 maintain their populations. We explored the interactive effects of larval phototaxis and 51 geotaxis and conspecific adult extracts on settlement rates of a representative suite of 52 six species of ascidians that form aggregations in the field, including four aliens with 53 global distributions, and how they relate to adult habitat characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an Updated Checklist
    Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e9273 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.4.e9273 Taxonomic Paper Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an updated checklist Chryssanthi Antoniadou‡, Vasilis Gerovasileiou§§, Nicolas Bailly ‡ Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece § Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Heraklion, Greece Corresponding author: Chryssanthi Antoniadou ([email protected]) Academic editor: Christos Arvanitidis Received: 18 May 2016 | Accepted: 17 Jul 2016 | Published: 01 Nov 2016 Citation: Antoniadou C, Gerovasileiou V, Bailly N (2016) Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an updated checklist. Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e9273. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9273 Abstract Background The checklist of the ascidian fauna (Tunicata: Ascidiacea) of Greece was compiled within the framework of the Greek Taxon Information System (GTIS), an application of the LifeWatchGreece Research Infrastructure (ESFRI) aiming to produce a complete checklist of species recorded from Greece. This checklist was constructed by updating an existing one with the inclusion of recently published records. All the reported species from Greek waters were taxonomically revised and cross-checked with the Ascidiacea World Database. New information The updated checklist of the class Ascidiacea of Greece comprises 75 species, classified in 33 genera, 12 families, and 3 orders. In total, 8 species have been added to the previous species list (4 Aplousobranchia, 2 Phlebobranchia, and 2 Stolidobranchia). Aplousobranchia was the most speciose order, followed by Stolidobranchia. Most species belonged to the families Didemnidae, Polyclinidae, Pyuridae, Ascidiidae, and Styelidae; these 4 families comprise 76% of the Greek ascidian species richness. The present effort revealed the limited taxonomic research effort devoted to the ascidian fauna of Greece, © Antoniadou C et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010-2011 California Regulations for Waterfowl and Upland Game Hunting, Public Lands
    Table of Contents CALIFORNIA General Information Contacting DFG ....................................... 2 10-11 Licenses, Stamps, & Permits................... 3 Waterfowl & Upland Shoot Time Tables ................................... 4 Game Hunting and Unlawful Activities .......................... 6 Hunting & Other Public Uses on State & Federal Waterfowl Hunting Lands Regulations Summary of Changes for 10-11 ............... 7 Seasons and Limits ................................. 9 Effective July 1, 2010 - June 30, 2011 Waterfowl Consumption Health except as noted. Warnings ............................................. 12 State of California Special Goose Hunt Area Maps ............ 14 Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger Waterfowl Zone Map ....Inside Back Cover Natural Resources Agency Upland Game Bird, Small Game Secretary Lester A. Snow Mammal, and Crow Hunting Regulation Summary ............................. 16 Fish and Game Commission President Jim Kellogg Seasons & Limits Table ......................... 17 Vice President Richard B. Rogers Hunt Zones ............................................ 18 Commissioner Michael Sutton Hunting and Other Public Uses on Commissioner Daniel W. Richards State and Federal Areas Acting Executive Director Jon Fischer Reservation System .............................. 20 General Public Use Activities on Department of Fish and Game Director John McCamman All State Wildlife Areas ....................... 23 Hunting, Firearms, and Archery Alternate communication formats are available upon request. If reasonable
    [Show full text]
  • GRA 9 – South Delta
    2-900 .! 2-905 .! 2-950 .! 2-952 2-908 .! .! 2-910 .! 2-960 .! 2-915 .! 2-963 .! 2-964 2-965 .! .! 2-917 .! 2-970 2-920 ! .! . 2-922 .! 2-924 .! 2-974 .! San Joaquin County 2-980 2-929 .! .! 2-927 .! .! 2-925 2-932 2-940 Contra Costa .! .! County .! 2-930 2-935 .! Alameda 2-934 County ! . Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, 2013 Calif. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife Area Map Office of Spill Prevention and Response I Data Source: O SPR NAD_1983_C alifornia_Teale_Albers ACP2 - GRA9 Requestor: ACP Coordinator Author: J. Muskat Date Created: 5/2 Environmental Sensitive Sites Section 9849 – GRA 9 South Delta Table of Contents GRA 9 Map ............................................................................................................................... 1 Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................... 2 Site Index/Response Action ...................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Response Resources for GRA 9......................................................................... 4 9849.1 Environmentally Sensitive Sites 2-900-A Old River Mouth at San Joaquin River....................................................... 1 2-905-A Franks Tract Complex................................................................................... 4 2-908-A Sand Mound Slough ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy
    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Sensitivity of Sublittoral Rock Habitats to Pressures Associated with Marine Activities
    JNCC Report No: 589B Assessing the sensitivity of sublittoral rock habitats to pressures associated with marine activities Maher, E., Cramb, P., de Ros Moliner, A., Alexander, D. & Rengstorf, A. September 2016 © JNCC, Peterborough 2016 ISSN 0963-8901 For further information please contact: Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY http://jncc.defra.gov.uk This report should be cited as: Maher, E., Cramb, P., de Ros Moliner, A., Alexander, D. & Rengstorf, A. 2016. Assessing the sensitivity of sublittoral rock habitats to pressures associated with marine activities. Marine Ecological Surveys Ltd – A report for the Joint Nature Conservation Committee. JNCC Report No. 589B. JNCC, Peterborough. Summary There are numerous human activities which occur in the marine environment. These activities can cause a variety of pressures on the seafloor habitats and the species they support. These pressures can occur in isolation or in combination, and their effects can be complex. To better understand the implications of anthropogenic pressures, it is crucial to be aware of how the pressures affect different species and functional ecological groups. The sensitivity of marine habitats has previously been assessed by Tillin et al (2010) and Tillin and Tyler-Walters (2014). Work by Tillin et al (2010) focused on the species, habitats and broadscale habitats recommended for designation within Marine Conservation Zones (MCZs) as part of a wider project (Tillin et al 2010). Tillin and Tyler-Walters (2014) focussed on systematic habitat level assessments of subtidal sedimentary habitats. Where possible, assessments were determined using available evidence and expert judgement. The aim of this project is to use the methods developed by Tillin and Tyler-Walters (2014) to assess the sensitivity of pre-defined ecological groups in sublittoral rock habitats in the UK to various anthropogenic pressures.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
    comparing futures for the sacramento–san joaquin delta jay lund | ellen hanak | william fleenor william bennett | richard howitt jeffrey mount | peter moyle 2008 Public Policy Institute of California Supported with funding from Stephen D. Bechtel Jr. and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation ISBN: 978-1-58213-130-6 Copyright © 2008 by Public Policy Institute of California All rights reserved San Francisco, CA Short sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, may be quoted without written permission provided that full attribution is given to the source and the above copyright notice is included. PPIC does not take or support positions on any ballot measure or on any local, state, or federal legislation, nor does it endorse, support, or oppose any political parties or candidates for public office. Research publications reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, officers, or Board of Directors of the Public Policy Institute of California. Summary “Once a landscape has been established, its origins are repressed from memory. It takes on the appearance of an ‘object’ which has been there, outside us, from the start.” Karatani Kojin (1993), Origins of Japanese Literature The Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta is the hub of California’s water supply system and the home of numerous native fish species, five of which already are listed as threatened or endangered. The recent rapid decline of populations of many of these fish species has been followed by court rulings restricting water exports from the Delta, focusing public and political attention on one of California’s most important and iconic water controversies.
    [Show full text]