DOCSLIB.ORG

Contents Welcome

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Contents Welcome contents Welcome . 2 Contributors and Sponsors . .3 Committees . 4 Steering Committee . 4 Awards . 4 Finance . 4 Local Arrangements . 4 Media/Outreach . 4 Operations/Web Site . 5 Posters . 5 Program . .5 Site Selection . 5 Session Organizers . 6 Exhibitors . 8 General Information . .9 Registration and Information Desk . 9 Poster Sessions . .9 Poster Session Receptions . 9 Presenter Practice Room . 9 Media . .9 Session Moderators . .9 Symposium Evaluation . 9 Continuing Education Credits . 9 Post-Symposium . 9 Daily Schedules . 10 Sunday, March 22, 2009 . .10 Monday, March 23, 2009 . 10 6th International IPM Symposium Tuesday, March 24, 2009 . 11 coordinated by the Office of Wednesday, March 25, 2009 . .12 Continuing Education Thursday, March 26, 2009 . .13 Friday, March 27, 2009 . 13 Symposium Program and Abstracts . 14 Poster Abstracts . 8. 0 www .ipmcenters org/. ipmsymposium09/ Author Index . .144 1 welcome Transcending Boundaries t is with great pleasure that we welcome you to the Sixth Inter- national IPM Symposium, occurring March 24–26 in Portland, IOregon. Our all-volunteer planning committees for the meeting have worked hard to bring you an excellent program focusing on transcending boundaries in IPM. The plenary session provides an informative kickoff for our meeting, followed by equally stimulat- ing sessions on water quality and structural pest issues, to “green” IPM and IPM in schools. The wide range of topics blends disci- plines and content and embodies the very definition of IPM. There are several sessions relating to a “green” theme, very appropriate given the city we are meeting in. We hope you will enjoy the many cultural and outdoor offerings as well as the special building tours of the environmentally sensitive convention center and hotel. Join your colleagues from around the world to hear about the latest research, discover new ways to deliver the IPM message, and connect with old friends and new colleagues. We look forward to seeing you at the poster receptions, hearing from you during the symposia, and talking with you during the social events. Welcome to Portland! Sincerely, George F. Czapar, Thomas A. Green, Carrie Lapaire Harmon Co-chairs, 6th International IPM Symposium 2 6th International IPM Symposium contributors and sponsors We thank our contributors and sponsors for their generous support of IPM and this symposium . Industry Contributors Government Sponsors Gold Level ($5,000 and up) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health CropLife America Integrated Pest Management Collaborative Research Monsanto Support Program (IPM CRSP) SYSCO Corporation IR-4 Project National Plant Diagnostic Network Silver Level ($1,000 to $4,999) National Science Foundation Center for Integrated Pest Brandt Consolidated, Inc. Management (NSF Center for IPM) Del Monte Southern Plant Diagnostic Network Dow AgroSciences Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) Floratine Biosciences, Inc. U.S. Department of Agriculture General Mills Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Gylling Data Management Service Regional IPM Centers Insect Resistance Action Council (IRAC)-United States National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) International Potash Institute Office of Pest Management Policy (OPMP) Lonza, Inc. Risk Management Agency (RMA) MidWest Food Processors Association U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Pesticide Programs—PestWise Plant and Insect Ecosystems Section, Entomological Society of America University of California Statewide IPM Program Valent USA Corporation Whitmire Micro-Gen Research Labs, Inc. Bronze Level (Up to $1,000) International Plant Nutrition Institute Orkin Sprague Pest Solutions Trécé, Inc. Contributors 3 committees Steering Committee John Masiunas, [email protected], WSSA, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at George Czapar, Co-chair, [email protected], Springfield Extension Center, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL University of Illinois Extension, University of Illinois at Urbana- Todd Peterson, [email protected], U.S. Environmental Protection Champaign, Springfield, IL Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC Thomas Green, Co-chair, [email protected], IPM Institute of Lee Tanner, [email protected], U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, North America, Inc., Madison, WI Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC Carrie Lapaire Harmon, Co-chair, [email protected], Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Southern Plant Finance Diagnostic Network, Gainesville, FL Margaret Appleby, [email protected], Ontario Ministry of Thomas Green, Chair, [email protected], IPM Institute of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Brighton, ON, Canada North America, Inc., Madison, WI Sue Blodgett, [email protected], Plant Science Department, George Czapar, [email protected], Springfield Extension Center, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD University of Illinois Extension, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, Springfield, IL Sherry Glick, [email protected], Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV Tom Hall, [email protected], Monsanto Company, Englewood, CO Robert Hedlund, [email protected], Integrated Pest Management/ Pesticides Management, United States Agency for International Allan Noe, [email protected], CropLife Foundation, Development/Bureau for Economic Growth Agriculture and Trade/ Washington, DC Agriculture, Washington, DC Tom Rabaey, [email protected], General Mills, LeSueur, MN Norman C. Leppla, [email protected], Institute of Food and Susan Ratcliffe, [email protected], North Central IPM Center, Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL Brenna Wanous, [email protected], IPM Institute of North Brenna Wanous, [email protected], IPM Institute of North America, Inc., Madison WI America, Inc., Madison, WI Elaine Wolff, [email protected], Conferences & Institutes, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL Local Arrangements Paul Jepson, [email protected], Oregon State University, Awards Corvallis, OR Sherry Glick, Chair, [email protected], U.S. Environmental Carrie Thibodeaux, [email protected], Sprague Pest Solutions, Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Las Vegas, NV Seattle, WA Michael Brewer, [email protected], Michigan State University, East Brenna Wanous, [email protected], IPM Institute of North Lansing, MI America, Inc., Madison, WI Sanyal Debanjan, [email protected], Monsanto Company, Monmouth Agronomy Center, Monmouth, IL Media/Outreach Pete Goodell, [email protected], University of California Statewide Norman Leppla, Chair, [email protected], Institute of Food and IPM Program, Kearney Ag Center, Parlier, CA Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Dawn Gouge, [email protected], University of Arizona, Maricopa, Randy Anderson, [email protected], North Central AZ Agricultural Research Laboratory, Brookings, SD Thomas Green, [email protected], IPM Institute of North Kristie Auman-Bauer, [email protected], Pennsylvania State University, America, Inc., Madison, WI University Park, PA Janet Hurley, [email protected], Southwest Technical Resource Phoebe Mukiria, [email protected], Kenya Agricultural Center, Texas A&M Dallas Agricultural Research and Extension Research Institute Trypanosomiasis Research Centre, Kikuyu, Kenya Center, Dallas, TX Rob Ward, [email protected], Pest Management Regulatory Marc Lame, [email protected], Indiana University, Bloomington, IN Agency (of Health Canada), Ottawa, ON, Canada 4 6th International IPM Symposium Operations/Web Site Program Ron Stinner, [email protected], NSF Center for Integrated Pest Margaret Appleby, Co-chair, [email protected], Ontario Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Brighton, ON, Brenna Wanous, [email protected], IPM Institute of North Canada America, Inc., Madison, WI Robert Hedlund, Co-chair, [email protected], U.S. AID/EGAT/AG, Elaine Wolff, [email protected], Conferences & Institutes, University of Washington, DC Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL Greta Schuster, Co-chair, [email protected], Texas A&M, Eva Zurek, [email protected], NSF Center for Integrated Pest Kingston, TX Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC Randy Anderson, [email protected], North Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, Brookings, SD Posters David Clement, [email protected], Home and Garden Information Center, University of Maryland, Ellicott City, MD Sue Blodgett, Co-chair, [email protected], Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD George Czapar, [email protected], Springfield Extension Center, University of Illinois Extension, University of Illinois at Urbana- Jerry Brust, Co-chair, [email protected], Central Maryland Research & Champaign, Springfield, IL Education Center, University of Maryland, Upper Marlboro, MD Chris Geiger, [email protected], San Francisco Department of the Kassim Al-Khatib, [email protected], Department of Agronomy, Kansas Environment IPM Program, San Francisco, CA State University, Manhattan, KS Scott Hutchins, [email protected],
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Report
    Final Report Final pre-release investigations of the gorse thrips (Sericothrips staphylinus) as a biocontrol agent for gorse (Ulex europaeus) in North America Date: August 31, 2012 Award Number: 10-CA-11420004-184 Report Period: June 1, 2010– May 31, 2012 Project Period: June 1, 2010– May 31, 2012 Recipient: Oregon State University Recipient Contact Person: Fritzi Grevstad Principal Investigator/ Project Director: Fritzi Grevstad Introduction Gorse (Ulex europaeus) is an environmental weed classified as noxious in the states of Washington, Oregon, California, and Hawaii. A classical biological control program has been applied in Hawaii with the introduction of 4 gorse-feeding arthropods, but only two of these (a mite and a seed weevil) have been introduced to the mainland U.S. The two insects that have not yet been introduced include the gorse thrips, Sericothips staphylinus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), and the moth Agonopterix umbellana (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae). With prior support from the U.S. Forest Service (joint venture agreement # 07-JV-281), we were able to complete host specificity testing of S. staphylinus on 44 North American plant species that were on the original test plant list. However, following review of the proposed Test Plant List, the Technical Advisory Group on Biocontrol of Weeds (TAG) recommended that we include an additional 18 plant species for testing. In this report, we present host specificity testing and related objectives necessary to bring the program to the implementation stage. Objectives (1) Acquire and grow the additional 18 species of plants recommended by the TAG. (2) Complete host specificity trials for the gorse thrips on the 18 plant species.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Biological Control of Arthropods in Australia
    Classical Biological Contents Control of Arthropods Arthropod index in Australia General index List of targets D.F. Waterhouse D.P.A. Sands CSIRo Entomology Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 2001 Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index List of targets The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia Waterhouse, D.F. and Sands, D.P.A. 2001. Classical biological control of arthropods in Australia. ACIAR Monograph No. 77, 560 pages. ISBN 0 642 45709 3 (print) ISBN 0 642 45710 7 (electronic) Published in association with CSIRO Entomology (Canberra) and CSIRO Publishing (Melbourne) Scientific editing by Dr Mary Webb, Arawang Editorial, Canberra Design and typesetting by ClarusDesign, Canberra Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne Cover: An ichneumonid parasitoid Megarhyssa nortoni ovipositing on a larva of sirex wood wasp, Sirex noctilio. Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index Foreword List of targets WHEN THE CSIR Division of Economic Entomology, now Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Entomology, was established in 1928, classical biological control was given as one of its core activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Goldspotted Oak Borer T.W
    Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet 183 March 2015 U.S. Department of Agriculture • Forest Service Goldspotted Oak Borer T.W. Coleman1, M.I. Jones2, S.L. Smith3, R.C. Venette4, M.L. Flint5, and S.J. Seybold 6 The goldspotted oak borer (GSOB), New Mexico, and southwestern Texas. Agrilus auroguttatus Schaeffer Specimens of GSOB have only been (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) (Figure collected from Arizona, California, 1), is a flatheaded phloem- and wood and Mexico. In southeastern Arizona, borer that infests and kills several GSOB feeds primarily on Q. emoryi, species of oak (Fagaceae: Quercus) in and silverleaf oak, Q. hypoleucoides A. California. One or more populations Camus (both Section Lobatae). Larval of GSOB were likely introduced via feeding injures the phloem and outer infested firewood into San Diego xylem of these red oak species, with County, California from the native most feeding activity and occasional range in southeastern Arizona. Since cases of tree mortality noted in large- its introduction to California, GSOB has expanded its range and has killed red oaks (Quercus Section Lobatae) nearly continuously across public and private lands (Figure 2). Distribution and Hosts The native distribution of GSOB likely coincides with that of Emory oak, Q. emoryi Torrey, including the Coronado Figure 1. Adult goldspotted oak borer, Agrilus National Forest in southeastern auroguttatus, an exotic insect threatening red Arizona and floristically related oaks in California (Adults are approximately regions in northern Mexico, southern 0.35 inches long by 0.08 inches wide). 1Entomologist, USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, San Bernardino, CA; 2Entomologist, Dept. of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY; 3Entomologist, USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Susanville, CA; 4Research Biologist, USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Entomology Research Recommendations
    ENTOMOLOGY RESEARCH FINDINGS/ RECOMMENDATIONS Division of Crop Protection 01. Research Findings of Research based on Sugarcane Woolly Aphid (SWA); Ceratovacuna lanigera (Homoptera: Aphididae) i. Natural enemy spectrum of SWA includes only arthropod predators and six species have been identified (Wanasinghe et al; 2012). - Dipha aphidivora (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) - Micromus sp. (Neuroptera: Hemorabiidae) - Eupeodes sp. (Diptera: Syrphidae) - Micraspis discolor (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae) - Synonycha sp. (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae) - Micraspis allardi (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae) Reference: - VKASM Wanasinghe, NC Kumarasinghe and KMG Chanchala (2012). Natural Enemies of Sugarcane Woolly Aphid (Ceratovacuna lanigera): A survey in Passara, Sri Lanka. Proceeding of the forth symposium on plantation crop research, pp 163-170 (Annex 01). ii. Variations of population density of the three natural predators of SWA According to the data collected to find out the variations of population density of the three natural predators of SWA (Dipha aphidivora, Micromus sp. and unidentified Syrphid fly larva) from January 2012 to December 2014 indicated that, Dipha aphidivora and Micromus sp. were recorded throughout the sampling period. Peak populations of Dipha aphidivora were recorded in months of December and January in each year. Peak populations of Micromus sp. were recorded during the time periods with low number of Dipha aphidivora and the correlation coefficient value between the population levels of Dipha aphidivora and Micromus sp. is 0.0047. Unidentified Syrphid fly larva was recorded an uneven distribution during the study period (Annual Research Progress, 2014) iii. Relationship of the three natural predators of SWA with some weather parameters The results of the Pearson correlation coefficient values of each three predator with rainfall, temperature and relative humidity (Table 1) have indicated that, there were no significant correlations of each predator with the weather parameters (Annual Research Progress, 2014) (Annex 02).
    [Show full text]
  • Goldspotted Oak Borer Bibliography
    February 22, 2011 Goldspotted Oak Borer Bibliography Coleman, T.W.; Flint, M.L.; and Seybold, S.J. 2009. Managing the invasive goldspotted oak borer in the California wildland-urban interface: Outlines of an IPM Program. The Sixth International IPM Symposium, Portland, OR. Abstract P159, p. 132 (poster presentation by Flint). Coleman, T.W.; Grulke, N.E.; Daly, M.; Godinez, C.; Schilling, S.L.; Riggan, P.J.; and Seybold, S.J. 2011. Coast live oak, Quercus agrifolia, susceptibility and response to goldspotted oak borer, Agrilus auroguttatus, injury in southern California. Forest Ecology and Management. In Press. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.02.008 Coleman, T.W. and Seybold, S.J. 2008. New pest in California: The goldspotted oak borer, Agrilus coxalis Waterhouse. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, State and Private Forestry. Pest Alert R5-RP-022. 4 pp. Coleman, T.W. and Seybold, S.J. 2008. Previously unrecorded damage to oak, Quercus spp., in southern California by the goldspotted oak borer, Agrilus coxalis Waterhouse (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 84: 288–300. Coleman, T.W. and Seybold, S.J. 2010. GSOB ≠ SOD: Tree mortality from the goldspotted oak borer in oak woodlands of southern California. pp. 58–63, in Frankel, S.J.; Kliejunas, J.T.; Palmieri, K.M., tech. cords. 2010. Proceedings of the Sudden Oak Death Fourth Science Symposium. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-229, Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. 378 pp. Coleman, T.W. and Seybold, S.J. 2009. Striking gold in southern California: Discovery of the goldspotted oak borer and its central role in oak mortality.
    [Show full text]
  • Micro Moths on Great Cumbrae Island (Vc100)
    The Glasgow Naturalist (online 2017) Volume 26, xx-xx Micro moths on Great Cumbrae Island (vc100) P. G. Moore 32 Marine Parade, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae KA28 0EF E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Forsythia sp. Behind the office is a large mature Few previous records exist for miCro-moths from black mulberry tree (Morus nigra) and to one side is vC100. Data are presented from the first year-round a tall privet hedge (Ligustrum ovalifolium). To the moth-trapping exerCise accomplished on Great rear of my property is a wooded escarpment with Cumbrae Island; one of the least studied of the old-growth ash (Fraxinus excelsior) frequently ivy- Clyde Isles (vC100). Data from a Skinner-type light- Covered (Hedera helix), sycamore (Acer trap, supplemented by Collection of leaf mines from pseudoplatanus) and rowan (Sorbus aucuparia), local trees, revealed the presence of 71 species of with an undergrowth of hawthorn (Crataegus miCro moths, representing 20 new records for the monogyna), wild garliC (Allium ursinum), nettle vice-County. (Urtica dioica), bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) and bramble (Rubus fructicosus). Rhind (1988) detailed INTRODUCTION the vasCular plants found on Great Cumbrae Island The extensive nineteenth-century list of between 1985 and 1987 and delineated the history Lepidoptera in the 1901 handbook on the natural of the island's botanical investigations. Leaves of history of Glasgow and the West of SCotland issued brambles in my garden, beech trees (Fagus for the Glasgow meeting of the British AssoCiation sylvatica) and hazel (Corylus avellana) at other for the Advancement of SCience (Elliot et al., 1901) locations on the island (respectively Craiglea Wood inCluded few Cumbrae records.
    [Show full text]
  • Previously Unrecorded Damage to Oak, Quercus Spp., in Southern California by the Goldspotted Oak Borer, Agrilus Coxalis Waterhouse (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) 1 2 TOM W
    THE PAN-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGIST 84(4):288–300, (2008) Previously unrecorded damage to oak, Quercus spp., in southern California by the goldspotted oak borer, Agrilus coxalis Waterhouse (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) 1 2 TOM W. COLEMAN AND STEVEN J. SEYBOLD 1USDA Forest Service-Forest Health Protection, 602 S. Tippecanoe Ave., San Bernardino, California 92408 Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected] 2USDA Forest Service-Pacific Southwest Research Station, Chemical Ecology of Forest Insects, 720 Olive Dr., Suite D, Davis, California 95616 e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. A new and potentially devastating pest of oaks, Quercus spp., has been discovered in southern California. The goldspotted oak borer, Agrilus coxalis Waterhouse (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), colonizes the sapwood surface and phloem of the main stem and larger branches of at least three species of Quercus in San Diego Co., California. Larval feeding kills patches and strips of the phloem and cambium resulting in crown die back followed by mortality. In a survey of forest stand conditions at three sites in this area, 67% of the Quercus trees were found with external or internal evidence of A. coxalis attack. The literature and known distribution of A. coxalis are reviewed, and similarities in the behavior and impact of this species with other tree-killing Agrilus spp. are discussed. Key Words. Agrilus coxalis, California, flatheaded borer, introduced species, oak mortality, Quercus agrifolia, Quercus chrysolepis, Quercus kelloggii, range expansion. INTRODUCTION Extensive mortality of coast live oak, Quercus agrifolia Ne´e (Fagaceae), Engelmann oak, Quercus engelmannii Greene, and California black oak, Q. kelloggii Newb., has occurred since 2002 on the Cleveland National Forest (CNF) in San Diego Co., California.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Biocontrol WHAT’S NEW?
    ISSUE 73 / AUGUST 2015 Weed Biocontrol WHAT’S NEW? Highlights • TWO NEW WORLD-FIRST AGENTS • WHAT BUGS THE BUGS? • HERB INVASION Privet lace bug Contents NEW WORLD BIOCONTROL CATALOGUE 2 FROM THE EDITOR We have refreshed the look of this newsletter to bring it into line with other Landcare BIOCONTROL AGENTS Research publications, but the content, style and purpose (to keep you updated and RELEASED IN 2014/15 2 informed about weed biocontrol research) remain unchanged. This is the slightly longer issue that we produce each August. Thanks to our many loyal readers who regularly send HERB INVASION IN feedback after each issue. It is always wonderful to receive this and please keep it coming. HAWKE’S BAY 3 If you still receive a hard copy and are ready to make the move to an electronic version, please let me know. Happy reading! Lynley. TWO NEW ‘WORLD-FIRST’ AGENTS READY FOR COMBAT 4 New World Biocontrol Catalogue WHAT’S BUGGING OUR BUGS? 6 SPRING ACTIVITIES 8 The last (4th) version of Julien and Griffi ths’ A World Catalogue of Agents and their Target `WHO’S WHO’ IN BIOLOGICAL Weeds was published in 1998. For many years this was the go-to place to fi nd out what CONTROL OF WEEDS? 10 weed biocontrol agents have been released around the world and how successful they have been, but had become seriously out of date. Recently an international team of FURTHER READING 12 researchers, led by Rachel Winston, has undertaken a major revision and expansion of this catalogue, which now includes 224 weeds and 552 agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Desktop Biodiversity Report
    Desktop Biodiversity Report Land at Balcombe Parish ESD/14/747 Prepared for Katherine Daniel (Balcombe Parish Council) 13th February 2014 This report is not to be passed on to third parties without prior permission of the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre. Please be aware that printing maps from this report requires an appropriate OS licence. Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre report regarding land at Balcombe Parish 13/02/2014 Prepared for Katherine Daniel Balcombe Parish Council ESD/14/74 The following information is included in this report: Maps Sussex Protected Species Register Sussex Bat Inventory Sussex Bird Inventory UK BAP Species Inventory Sussex Rare Species Inventory Sussex Invasive Alien Species Full Species List Environmental Survey Directory SNCI M12 - Sedgy & Scott's Gills; M22 - Balcombe Lake & associated woodlands; M35 - Balcombe Marsh; M39 - Balcombe Estate Rocks; M40 - Ardingly Reservior & Loder Valley Nature Reserve; M42 - Rowhill & Station Pastures. SSSI Worth Forest. Other Designations/Ownership Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty; Environmental Stewardship Agreement; Local Nature Reserve; National Trust Property. Habitats Ancient tree; Ancient woodland; Ghyll woodland; Lowland calcareous grassland; Lowland fen; Lowland heathland; Traditional orchard. Important information regarding this report It must not be assumed that this report contains the definitive species information for the site concerned. The species data held by the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre (SxBRC) is collated from the biological recording community in Sussex. However, there are many areas of Sussex where the records held are limited, either spatially or taxonomically. A desktop biodiversity report from SxBRC will give the user a clear indication of what biological recording has taken place within the area of their enquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Goldspotted Oak Borer: Revisiting the Status of an Invasive Pest Six Years After 1 Its Discovery
    The Goldspotted Oak Borer: Revisiting the Status of an Invasive Pest Six Years After 1 Its Discovery 2 3 Steven J. Seybold and Tom W. Coleman Abstract The goldspotted oak borer, Agrilus auroguttatus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), was first associated with oak mortality in San Diego County, California in May of 2008. Since that time, a research and survey program has outlined the biology of this flatheaded borer in the invaded and native habitats; delimited the invaded range; and developed the components of an integrated pest management (IPM) program. Significant advances have been made in the understanding of its host range, feeding habits, life cycle, and natural enemies in Arizona and California. Some research progress has also been made on the evaluation of techniques for the detection of the pest and treatments to ameliorate its damage. Since the original discovery, we have learned that A. auroguttatus feeds primarily on red oaks in the section Lobatae and that although its landscape-level impacts unfold slowly, it appears to be capable of killing these trees without the aid of abiotic or other biotic factors. The biology, behavior, and impact of A. auroguttatus have also been contrasted with a less well understood sibling species, the Mexican goldspotted oak borer, Agrilus coxalis. The key questions remaining about A. auroguttatus are: 1) Has sufficient progress been made to facilitate a functional IPM program should the expanding distribution of A. auroguttatus reach the urban oaks of the Los Angeles basin or woodland oaks in the foothills of the Sierra Nevada? and 2) Can we assess the risk and predict the population expansion to these lands? Key words: Agrilus auroguttatus, California black oak, canyon live oak, coast live oak, goldspotted oak borer, mortality agent Introduction The goldspotted oak borer (GSOB), Agrilus auroguttatus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • 045-104 Huisman.Indd 45 13-06-12 08:35 Oblique Dots Figure 1-2
    the micro moth genus AGONOPTERIX in the netherlands (lepidoptera: elachistidae: depressariinae) Hans Huisman In this paper the Dutch species of the micro moth genus Agonopterix are presented. The identification is notoriously difficult. Therefore high quality illustrations of the male and female genitalia are provided. A revision of the Dutch material proved that A. atomella and A. capreolella have to be removed from the Dutch list, whereas A. oinochra is new to the Dutch fauna. Several species have disappeared from the Netherlands, of which Agonopterix laterella is the most conspicuous. The caterpillar lives on cornflower, a beautiful blue flower that once gave colour to the Dutch agricul- tural landscape. Now it has almost disappeared, taking Agonopterix laterella along in its fall. Distribution maps and phenology charts are provided for all 23 Dutch species. introduction The genus Agonopterix Hübner, 1825 is a group genitalia of the majority of species from Western of micro moths that is notoriously difficult to and Central Europe and an indispensable base for identify. In the Netherlands the study of this further exploration, but very difficult to handle as genus has been neglected for a long time. Snellen a key, because of the variability of the characters (1882) gave useful descriptions and a key in his and some inaccuracies in the text and unclearness standard work on the Dutch Lepidoptera. Just in the rather schematic figures. A brief survey of like all his papers and books this is a work of ex- the British species was given by Jacobs (1978). cellent quality, but the key is based on external Palm (1989) published a book on the Oecophori- characters alone and is verbose and complicated dae of Northern Europe, with beautiful figures of to use.
    [Show full text]