DOCSLIB.ORG

UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Modernist Novel Speaks Its Mind Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/46j6r502 Author Kerschen, Paul Robert Publication Date 2010 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Modernist Novel Speaks its Mind By Paul Robert Kerschen A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Michael André Bernstein, Chair Professor Katherine Snyder Professor Alva Noë Spring 2010 1 Abstract The Modernist Novel Speaks its Mind by Paul Robert Kerschen Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California, Berkeley This study conceives the modernist novel as arising from a problem in genre. The end of the nineteenth century left English literature with a rich tradition of narrative prose describing the social and material worlds. At the same time, its aesthetic discourse was dominated by a Romantic poetics which described artworks as staging an opposition between spirit and matter, nature and freedom; and which placed lyric poetry, as an expression of spirit rather than a mimesis of nature, uppermost in its ranking of genres. The difficulties in reconciling this aesthetic to novelistic form account for the strangeness of the modernist novel, whose linguistic form aspires to the condition of lyric at the same time that its plot stages the failure of such an aspiration, the inability of Romanticism to imagine its own fulfillment. I begin with Henry James as a transitional figure; continue with William Faulkner and Virginia Woolf as exemplars of a Romantic-lyric poetics of the novel; and conclude with James Joyce, whose fictional forms resemble those of his contemporaries but ultimately reject many of their Romantic commitments. Some reference is made to twentieth-century philosophers, in particular Ludwig Wittgenstein, as thinkers with points of concordance. i Table of Contents Preface ii 1. Henry James: Imagination and Bondage 1 2. William Faulkner: Analogy and Silence 35 3. Virginia Woolf: Viewpoint and Veil 50 4. James Joyce: Word and Flesh 73 Bibliography 114 ii Preface What follow are some notes on the modernist novel in English. In sequence they tell a kind of story. In assembling this story I have had to ask myself the same narrative questions that confronted the figures who are its subjects: where to start, where to stop, what balance to give empirical detail and imaginative pattern, how to draw a shape which both reflects facts as they are and displays intelligible form. If my answers are not always the best, I hope they cast some light on the answers the modernists found. I conceive the modernist novel as arising from a problem in genre. The end of the nineteenth century left English literature with a rich tradition of narrative prose describing the social and material worlds. At the same time, its aesthetic discourse was dominated by a Romantic poetics which described artworks as staging an opposition between spirit and matter, nature and freedom; and which placed lyric poetry, as an expression of spirit rather than a mimesis of nature, uppermost in its ranking of genres. The difficulties in reconciling this aesthetic to novelistic form account for the strangeness of the modernist novel, whose linguistic form aspires to the condition of lyric at the same time that its plot stages the failure of such an aspiration, the inability of Romanticism to imagine its own fulfillment. I begin with Henry James as a transitional figure; continue with William Faulkner and Virginia Woolf as exemplars of a Romantic-lyric poetics of the novel; and conclude with James Joyce, whose fictional forms resemble those of his contemporaries but ultimately reject many of their Romantic commitments. While I am conscious that these experiments took place in particular historical moments, I have chosen not to structure this as a historicist study. For better or for worse, it is best classed with Charles Tansley’s dissertation in To the Lighthouse as being about the influence of something upon somebody. My working method has been to assume that literary forms carry within them philosophical commitments about language and its relation to other areas of human experience, and that criticism can do the work of elucidating these commitments, even—or especially—if the commitments prove incoherent. My own views on philosophical questions of language and knowledge have been influenced by modern philosophers including Ludwig Wittgenstein, Wilfrid Sellars, Donald Davidson, John McDowell, and Cora Diamond. Here and there I make reference to these philosophers, and over the course of my narrative it will become apparent that I see Joyce’s fictional forms as providing an especially close fit to their views. It should go without saying that this concordance does not imply a critical judgment for Joyce and against others. To treat philosophy, including the subset of philosophy known as “theory,” as an orthodoxy for the evaluation of literature is to obscure all literary interest. Nor would anything be at stake in such a judgment, since we are fortunate to occupy a historical moment in which a question like Lukács’s “Franz Kafka or Thomas Mann?” does not make sense. A view that is incoherent as philosophical doctrine can become a productive tension in literature; at least I have assumed so. Over the course of this project I received financial support from the Graduate Division and the English Department. Without the further support of Molly and Tom Erwin and Ed Kerschen I would have been unable to pursue doctoral study. I am grateful for the kind attention of my committee members, Michael André Bernstein, Katherine Snyder and Alva Noë; and especially for the encouragement and wisdom of John Bishop, who served as chair for most of the project. Some material was read in earlier versions by Brett Bourbon, Carolyn Porter, Ann Banfield and Dorothy Hale. Steven Goldsmith and Kevis Goodman were early guides on iii Romanticism, as was Nada O’Neal on Wittgenstein. Joshua Kortbein pointed me toward a title. From Jessie Ferguson I have learned many things, not all to be categorized. 1 One Henry James: Imagination and Bondage There are two familiar ideas about the late Henry James, not easily reconciled to each other. On the one hand, James’s attention to individual consciousness and point of view seems to indicate a single-observer epistemology and a corresponding perspectivism—a “relativistic universe” of “monadic isolation,” in one formulation,1 whose inhabitants have lost all common interpretive ground for making sense of the world. At the same time, James is understood as a paradigmatically social novelist concerned above all with nuances of interpersonal relations, a novelist for whom consciousness itself is “made to take shape—indeed, to become social—as an intersubjective phenomenon,” who portrays minds as “locked into such tight relations of dependence and mutual reflection… that such minds themselves seem nothing but the tissue of their relations.”2 Of course these two Jameses, the observer of individual consciousness and the dramatist of social relations, are not necessarily incompatible; but to combine them will require a particular kind of account. I attempt such an account here, reading the late James as staging a repeated contest between public and private claims, which has the apparent effect of splitting his centers of consciousness into public and private selves. The “oddity of a double consciousness”3 which burdens Lambert Strether among many others is a condition whose etiology reaches back to Romanticism, but which James presents in a particularly modern light. James restages the Romantic contest of nature and freedom not as a struggle between heaven and earth, as in Faust’s two souls, nor as Emerson’s “double consciousness” spanning “the two lives of the Understanding & of the Soul,”4 but as a struggle between the private imagination and the public persona. Against his protagonists’ need “to meet the requirements of their imagination”5 James pits all the exigencies of the social and material worlds. The imagination can preserve its freedom only by detaching itself from the outside world, which entails a corresponding detachment from that portion of the mind practically engaged with the world—that is to say, the abandonment of personal will. Such are those gestures in James typically glossed as renunciation. And the darkest streak in James is the fear that even such extreme detachment will turn out not to provide sufficient protection, that the exercise of imagination will itself prove to be another determining force. To see the public world not as the milieu in which one finds the ends of life, but rather an active impediment to reaching those ends, is to distrust the public discourse of history. The stylistic idiosyncrasy of James’s later work, like that of the modernist fiction which follows him, is largely a result of rejecting the quasi-historical narrative style of the nineteenth-century novel and replacing it with a Romantic aesthetic that derives its values from lyric poetry. The Golden Bowl, as an example of a novel written under this aesthetic, also serves a bellwether of the philosophical and moral problems that arise once this aesthetic is adopted. The Romantic outlook carries with it a provisionality, an inability to imagine its own fulfillment within history—and 1 Frederic Jameson, Marxism and Form (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974) 357. 2 Sharon Cameron, Thinking in Henry James (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989) 77; and Robert P. Pippin, Henry James and Modern Moral Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000) 68. 3 Henry James, The Ambassadors (New York: Norton, 1964) 18. 4 Ralph Waldo Emerson, The Journals and Miscellaneous Notebooks of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Volume VIII, 1841- 1843, ed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Loveʼs Negative Dialectic in Henry Jamesʼs the Golden Bowl
    /RYH૷V1HJDWLYH'LDOHFWLFLQ+HQU\-DPHV૷V7KH*ROGHQ 6X]LH*LEVRQ%RZO Philosophy and Literature, Volume 39, Number 1, April 2015, pp. 1-14 (Article) 3XEOLVKHGE\-RKQV+RSNLQV8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV DOI: 10.1353/phl.2015.0009 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/phl/summary/v039/39.1.gibson.html Access provided by Charles Sturt University (27 Nov 2015 00:57 GMT) Suzie Gibson LOve’S NEGATIVE DIALECTIC IN HENRY JAMES’S THE GOLDEN BOWL Abstract. In literary romance love operates as a narrative point of access, suspension, and ending: every element works toward its ultimate consummation. However, in the novels of Henry James, including The Golden Bowl, love is not fulfilled because it is intrinsically flawed. Here, I examine the broken nature of Jamesian love through two key philoso- phers, Jean-Luc Nancy and Martha Nussbaum, who assist in providing a rich theoretical dimension to the question of love’s representation. Ultimately, I address how love’s negative dialectic is elemental to nar- rative, thinking, and subjectivity. ince Plato’s SYMPOSIUM, romantic, sexual love has been characterized Sas a movement in desire that seeks wholeness and identity since it is, at heart, broken.1 The yearning for sexual consummation is predicated upon the idea that love completes the self. Copulation provides lovers with a moment of rapture, relief, and oneness, but once satisfied it is again wanting in reawakening the desire to pledge and to make love again. Love operates much like a promise whose constant and insistent offerings seek to recover again and again its inherent brokenness.
    [Show full text]
  • Wordsworth, Shelley, and the Long Search for Home Samantha Heffner Trinity University, [email protected]
    Trinity University Digital Commons @ Trinity English Honors Theses English Department 5-2017 Homeward Bound: Wordsworth, Shelley, and the Long Search for Home Samantha Heffner Trinity University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/eng_honors Recommended Citation Heffner, Samantha, "Homeward Bound: Wordsworth, Shelley, and the Long Search for Home" (2017). English Honors Theses. 28. http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/eng_honors/28 This Thesis open access is brought to you for free and open access by the English Department at Digital Commons @ Trinity. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Trinity. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Homeward Bound: Wordsworth, Shelley, and the Long Search for Home Samantha Heffner A DEPARTMENT HONORS THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH AT TRINITY UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRADUATION WITH DEPARTMENTAL HONORS DATE: April 15, 2017 Betsy Tontiplaphol Claudia Stokes THESIS ADVISOR DEPARTMENT CHAIR _____________________________________ Sheryl R. Tynes, AVPAA Heffner 2 Student Agreement I grant Trinity University (“Institution”), my academic department (“Department”), and the Texas Digital Library ("TDL") the non-exclusive rights to copy, display, perform, distribute and publish the content I submit to this repository (hereafter called "Work") and to make the Work available in any format in perpetuity as part of a TDL, Institution or Department repository communication or distribution effort. I understand that once the Work is submitted, a bibliographic citation to the Work can remain visible in perpetuity, even if the Work is updated or removed. I understand that the Work's copyright owner(s) will continue to own copyright outside these non-exclusive granted rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultures and Traditions of Wordplay and Wordplay Research the Dynamics of Wordplay
    Cultures and Traditions of Wordplay and Wordplay Research The Dynamics of Wordplay Edited by Esme Winter-Froemel Editorial Board Salvatore Attardo, Dirk Delabastita, Dirk Geeraerts, Raymond W. Gibbs, Alain Rabatel, Monika Schmitz-Emans and Deirdre Wilson Volume 6 Cultures and Traditions of Wordplay and Wordplay Research Edited by Esme Winter-Froemel and Verena Thaler The conference “The Dynamics of Wordplay / La dynamique du jeu de mots – Interdisciplinary perspectives / perspectives interdisciplinaires” (Universität Trier, 29 September – 1st October 2016) and the publication of the present volume were funded by the German Research Founda- tion (DFG) and the University of Trier. Le colloque « The Dynamics of Wordplay / La dynamique du jeu de mots – Interdisciplinary perspectives / perspectives interdisciplinaires » (Universität Trier, 29 septembre – 1er octobre 2016) et la publication de ce volume ont été financés par la Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) et l’Université de Trèves. ISBN 978-3-11-058634-3 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-058637-4 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-063087-9 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Control Number: 2018955240 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2018 Esme Winter-Froemel and Verena Thaler, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com Contents Esme Winter-Froemel, Verena Thaler and Alex Demeulenaere The dynamics of wordplay and wordplay research 1 I New perspectives on the dynamics of wordplay Raymond W.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Rise and Progress of Popular Disaffection,” in Es- Says, Moral and Political, 2 Vols
    Notes Introduction 1. Robert Southey, “On the Rise and Progress of Popular Disaffection,” in Es- says, Moral and Political, 2 vols. (1817; London: John Murray, 1832), II, 82. The identity of Junius remained a mystery, and even Edmund Burke was suspected. For an argument that he was Sir Philip Francis, see Alvar Ellegård, Who Was Junius? (The Hague, 1962). 2. Byron, “The Vision of Judgment” in Lord Byron: The Complete Poetical Works, ed. Jerome J. McGann and Barry Weller, 7 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980–92), VI, 309–45. 3. M. H. Abrams, Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Ro- mantic Literature (New York: W. W. Norton, 1971), p. 13. 4. See Anne K. Mellor, English Romantic Irony (Cambridge: Harvard Univer- sity Press, 1980). 5. Jerome J. McGann, The Romantic Ideology: A Critical Investigation (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1983), pp. 23–24. 6. Jerome J. McGann, Towards a Literature of Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), p. 39. 7. McGann, Towards a Literature of Knowledge, p. 39. 8. McGann, “Literary Pragmatics and the Editorial Horizon,” in Devils and Angels: Textual Editing and Literary Theory, ed. Philip Cohen (Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 1991), pp. 1–21 (13). 9. Marilyn Butler, “Satire and the Images of Self in the Romantic Period: The Long Tradition of Hazlitt’s Liber Amoris,” in English Satire and the Satiric Tradition, ed. Claude Rawson (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984), 209–25 (209). 10. Stuart Curran, Poetic Form and British Romanticism (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), pp. 12–13. 11. Gary Dyer, British Satire and the Politics of Style, 1789–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • The Scapegoats and Martyrs of Henry James
    Colby Quarterly Volume 10 Issue 7 September Article 4 September 1974 The Scapegoats and Martyrs of Henry James Elsa Nettels Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/cq Recommended Citation Colby Library Quarterly, series 10, no.7, September 1974, p.413-427 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Colby Quarterly by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Colby. Nettels: The Scapegoats and Martyrs of Henry James Colby Library Quarterly 413 THE SCAPEGOATS AND MARTYRS OF HENRY JAMES By ELSA NETTELS n most of his novels and tales, James dramatizes acts of I sacrifice, either destructive or redemptive in effect. At one extreme are the destructive sacrifices exacted of such char­ acters as Madame de Cintre (The American), May Bartram ("The Beast in the Jungle"), and Neil Paraday ("The Death of the Lion"), victims whose powers and hopes of life are wasted through the selfishness of others. At the other extreme is the redemptive sacrifice of Milly Theale (The Wings of the Dove), whose death effects the spiritual transformation of another per­ son. The motives underlying sacrificial acts and the values James attached to such acts can best be studied, however, in those novels which center on the consciousness of characters impelled by a psychological need to play the part of a sacrifi­ cial victim. Among these characters, two groups may be iden­ tified: those who assume the role of a scapegoat, making them­ selves responsible for the well-being of others and to some ex­ tent taking upon themselves the burden of others' suffering; and those who long to be martyrs and in whom the desire to be a sacrificial victim exists as a fact of their nature, independ­ ent of a particular situation.
    [Show full text]
  • “Vast Impropriety”: Tragedy, Camp Negation, and the Double Entendre in Henry James’S the Sacred Fount and the Golden Bowl
    “Vast Impropriety”: Tragedy, Camp Negation, and the Double Entendre in Henry James’s The Sacred Fount and The Golden Bowl LEN GUTKIN I. Jamesian Tragedy, Jamesian Camp The final paragraph of Henry James’s The Golden Bowl has long divided read- ers.1 The question is simple: Is the ending happy? Or not? If you think it is, then you will find the typically Jamesian note of renunciation here reduced to a dark shadow in an otherwise sunny scene — a happily resolved heterosexual comedy. If, on the contrary, you think The Golden Bowl is, as a friend put it to me, “a black book” (Thomas Koenigs, pers. comm.), you will emphasize instead James’s introduction of “pity and dread” — those watchwords of tragedy — into the ultimate sentence. The Prince and Maggie have been discussing the disposal of Charlotte, whom Maggie has declared “splendid.” “ ‘That’s our help, you see,’ she added — to point further her moral.” It kept him before her therefore, taking in — or trying to — what she so wonder- fully gave. He tried, too clearly, to please her — to meet her in her own way; but with the result only that, close to her, her face kept before him, his hands hold- ing her shoulders, his whole act enclosing her, he presently echoed: “ ‘See’? I see nothing but you.” And the truth of it had, with this force, after a moment, so strangely lighted his eyes that, as for pity and dread of them, she buried her own in his breast. (James [1904] 2009, 567) The Harvard Society of Fellows supported me during the research and writing of this essay.
    [Show full text]
  • 08 North Italy 1816
    1 BYRON’S CORRESPONDENCE AND JOURNALS 08: FROM NORTH ITALY, NOVEMBER 1816 Edited by Peter Cochran Work in progress, with frequent updates [indicated]. Letters not in the seventeen main files may be found in those containing the correspondences Byron / Annbella, Byron / Murray, Byron / Hobhouse, Byron / Moore, Byron / Scott, Byron / Kinnaird, Byron / The Shelleys , or Byron / Hoppner . UPDATED November 2010. Abbreviations B.: Byron; Mo: Moore; H.: Hobhouse; K.: Kinnaird; Mu.: Murray; Sh.: Shelley 1922: Lord Byron’s Correspondence Chiefly with Lady Melbourne, Mr Hobhouse, The Hon. Douglas Kinnaird, and P.B.Shelley (2 vols., John Murray 1922). BB: Byron’s Bulldog: The Letters of John Cam Hobhouse to Lord Byron, ed. Peter W.Graham (Columbus Ohio 1984) BLJ: Byron, George Gordon, Lord. Byron’s Letters and Journals . Ed. Leslie A. Marchand, 13 vols. London: John Murray 1973–94. Burnett: T.A.J. Burnett, The Rise and Fall of a Regency Dandy , John Murray, 1981. CSS: The Life and Correspondence of the Late Robert Southey , ed. C.C.Southey, Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, 6 vols 1849-1850. J.W.W.: Selections from the letters of Robert Southey , Ed. John Wood Warter, 4 vols, Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1856. LJ: The Works of Lord Byron, Letters and Journals . Ed. R. E. Prothero, 6 vols. London: John Murray, 1899-1904. LJM: The Letters of John Murray to Lord Byron . Ed. Andrew Nicholson, Liverpool University Press, 2007. NLS: National Library of Scotland. Q: Byron: A Self-Portrait; Letters and Diaries 1798 to 1824 . Ed. Peter Quennell, 2 vols, John Murray, 1950. Ramos: The letters of Robert Southey to John May, 1797 to 1838.
    [Show full text]
  • Strings of Pearls: James, Maupassant, and 'Paste' Philip Horne
    1 Strings of Pearls: James, Maupassant, and ‘Paste’ Philip Horne (UCL) Les perles composent le collier, mais c’est le fil qui fait le collier. Or, enfiler les perles sans en perdre une seule et toujours tenir son fil de l’autre main, voilà la malice… [The pearls compose the necklace, but it is the string which makes it a necklace. Now, to thread the pearls without losing a single one and always to hold one’s string with the other hand, there’s the trick…] (Gustave Flaubert, letter To Louise Colet, 26 August 1853)1 a case of feeling, of ever so many possible feelings, stretched across the scene like an attached thread on which the pearls of interest are strung (Henry James, Preface (1908) to The Princess Casamassima (1886))2 i À la Maupassant 1 Consulted 23 December 2018 at http://flaubert.univ- rouen.fr/correspondance/conard/outils/1853.htm 2 Henry James, Literary Criticism: French Writers, Other European Writers, The Prefaces to the New York Edition, edited by Leon Edel and Mark Wilson (New York: Library of America, 1984), p. 1092. (Hereafter LC II.) This essay began as a lecture given on 21 October 2016 at the Third International Conference of the European Society of Jamesian Studies at the American University of Paris, entitled “Reading Henry James in the Twenty-First Century: Heritage and Transmission”. I owe particular thanks to Denis Tredy for his extremely helpful ‘Teaching the “Grandsons of Balzac” a Lesson: Henry James in the 1890’s’ (E-rea: Revue électronique d’études sur le monde Anglophone, 2.1 (2004)), and to Mary Boyington, for her richly detailed PhD thesis, ‘«Esprit de Maupassant»: Henry James and French Realism, A Re-evaluation’ (Aix-Marseille Université, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Southey Poems Pdf
    Robert southey poems pdf Continue For the chairman of the Australian Ballet, see Robert Southee (businessman). This article needs additional quotes to verify. Please help improve this article by adding quotes to reliable sources. Non-sources of materials can be challenged and removed. Find sources: Robert Southee - news newspaper book scientist JSTOR (August 2018) (Learn, how and when to remove this template message) Robert SoutheyPortrait, c. 1795Born (1774-08-12)12 August 1774Bristole, EnglandDied21 March 1843 (1843-03-21) (age 68)London, EnglandOccupationPoet, historian, historian, historian, historian, historian, historian, historian, biographer, essayistLiter movementRoantisisspehit Fricker (1795-1838; her death)Carolina Ann Bowles (1839-1843; his death) Robert Southee (1839-1843; his death) Robert Southee (1839-1843; his death) Robert Southee (1839-1843; his death) Robert Southee (1839-1843; his death) Robert Southee (1839-1843; his death) Robert Southee (1839-1843; his death) Robert Southee (183 /ˈsaʊði/ or /ˈsʌði/; August 12, 1774 -March 21, 1843) was an English romantic poet and poet laureate from 1813 until his death. Like other lake poets, William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Southee began as a radical but became steadily more conservative as he gained respect for Britain and its institutions. Other romantics, notably Byron, accused him of siding with the institution for money and status. He is remembered as the author of the poem After Blenheim and the original version of Goldilocks and the Three Bears. Life Robert Southey, Sir Francis Chantrey, 1832, National Portrait Gallery, London Robert Southee was born in Wine Street, Bristol, Robert Southey and Margaret Hill. He was educated at Westminster School in London (where he was expelled for writing an article in The Flagellant, attributing the invention to the devil), and at Balliol College, Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Peer-Reviewed Article International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education Volume 3, Issue 1 (2018) https://www.ojed.org/jimphe Print ISSN 2474-2546 Online ISSN 2474-2554) doi: 10.5281/zenodo.2525821 Education Movements and William Wordsworth Md. Muntasir Mamun University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh, Bangladesh Abstract The seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries experienced major educational movements, including orthodox religious formalism and rationalistic formalism of the Enlightenment. Toward the end of the latter century, however, naturalist and individualist views of education began to counter formalism, inspired by poets and philosophers like William Wordsworth and Jean Jacques Rousseau. This article focuses on Wordsworth's poetry to show how his philosophy of moral and spiritual development of the individual helped to establish faith in Nature as a basis of moral guidance of education. Wordsworth believed that education is a process of natural growth of the student, and the teacher, like a gardener, should be a watchful guide on the side, not a sage on the stage. The child, engaged in real life situations and exposed to good role models, comes to understand the need for sharing, kindness, honesty, diligence, loyalty, courage, and other virtues. The article concludes by showing the value of the above philosophy for our time. In the 21st century, the business world of global capitalism threatens to reduce humanity to mere products or commodities and knowledge has become a mere market entity. Under these circumstances, William naturalistic philosophy of education can strengthen education against the capitalist threat. Keywords: Education, Religious formalism, The Enlightenment, Naturalism, William Wordsworth Up until the Enlightenment, social ideals favoured the view that conformity to social norms and the development of memory are the most important component 68 for the success of education.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanticism Romanticism Dominated Literature, Music, and the Arts in the First Half of the 19Th Century
    AP ACHIEVER Romanticism Romanticism dominated literature, music, and the arts in the first half of the 19th century. Romantics reacted to the Enlightenment’s emphasis on reason and science, instead stressing the following: • Emotions – Taking their cue from Rousseau, Romantics emphasized feeling and passion as the wellspring of knowledge and creativity. • Intuition – Science alone cannot decipher the world; imagination and the “mind’s eye” can also reveal its truths. • Nature – Whereas the philosophes studied nature analytically, the Romantics drew inspiration and awe from its mysteries and power. • Nationalism – Romanticism found a natural connection with nationalism; both emphasized change, passion, and connection to the past. • Religion (Supernatural) – Romanticism coincided with a religious revival, particularly in Catholicism. Spirit, mysticism, and emotions were central to both. • The unique individual – Romantics celebrated the individual of genius and talent, like a Beethoven or a Napoleon, rather than what was universal in all humans. With these themes in mind, consider the topics and individuals below: • THEME MUSIC AND EXAMPLE BASE Prior to the 19th century, you will have noted the rise of objective thinking toward the natural world (Scientific Revolution, Enlightenment), but with the Romantics, we see one of the first strong reactions to the notion that all knowledge stems from the scientific method (OS). Though not the first to do so, the Romantics embrace the subjectivity of experience in a singular and seductive manner. Literature and History Lord Byron (1788-1824 ) – As famous for his scandalous lifestyle as for his narrative poems, Lord Byron died from fever on his way to fight for Greek independence, a cause he supported in his writings.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Genius, Heredity, and Family Dynamics. Samuel Taylor Coleridge and His Children: a Literary Biography Yolanda J. Gonz
    ABSTRACT Genius, Heredity, and Family Dynamics. Samuel Taylor Coleridge and his Children: A Literary Biography Yolanda J. Gonzalez, Ph.D. Chairperson: Stephen Prickett, Ph.D. The children of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Hartley, Derwent, and Sara, have received limited scholarly attention, though all were important nineteenth century figures. Lack of scholarly attention on them can be blamed on their father, who has so overshadowed his children that their value has been relegated to what they can reveal about him, the literary genius. Scholars who have studied the children for these purposes all assume familial ties justify their basic premise, that Coleridge can be understood by examining the children he raised. But in this case, the assumption is false; Coleridge had little interaction with his children overall, and the task of raising them was left to their mother, Sara, her sister Edith, and Edith’s husband, Robert Southey. While studies of S. T. C.’s children that seek to provide information about him are fruitless, more productive scholarly work can be done examining the lives and contributions of Hartley, Derwent, and Sara to their age. This dissertation is a starting point for reinvestigating Coleridge’s children and analyzes their life and work. Taken out from under the shadow of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, we find that Hartley was not doomed to be a “child of romanticism” as a result of his father’s experimental approach to his education; rather, he chose this persona for himself. Conversely, Derwent is the black sheep of the family and consciously chooses not to undertake the family profession, writing poetry.
    [Show full text]