DOCSLIB.ORG

Fresno County Directory of Community Resources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DIRECTORY OF SOME COMMUNITY RESOURCES Department of Social Services Last Revised on 5/20/2021 The Family Resource Center, an affiliation to the Department of Social Services, is intended to supply a general community resource guide to the public. All hyperlinks leading off of this site should not be construed as an endorsement of any person or company. Any informational texts posted here are not intended to provide any advice or an opinion. These informational texts are provided as a service to all that visit this website and are general in nature. We make no guarantees for the performance or result of use of the information or services found in the following community resource guide. Under no circumstance will the Department of Social Services be held liable to any person or persons who may choose to rely on the information placed in this resource guide. All links are placed as a public service for the convenience of the internet user and may be withdrawn for any reason at any time without notification. This guide is also updated quarterly and the web address is provided on the last page. Please note: If there needs to be any changes or additions to the information in this guide you may contact Monica Mason at (559) 600-3577 or by email at [email protected]. 2 Tips on Navigating this Document using Adobe Reader Please note: If the document is opening in your web browser instead of Adobe Reader, these menus will not show. You can still navigate by using the table of contents below. Type in a zip code or word and press Enter to search and jump to that term. Click here to view table of contents To view a list of search results, click the arrow to pull down the drop-down menu and click “Open Full Reader Search”. 3 Table of Contents 24 Hour Hotlines ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Adoptions and Foster Care .............................................................................................................................. 12 Adults/Children with Special Needs and Children’s Early Intervention Services .......................................... 17 Adult Day Health Care .................................................................................................................................... 24 Advocacy Groups ............................................................................................................................................ 28 Alcohol and Drug Services .............................................................................................................................. 38 Anger Management/Domestic Violence ......................................................................................................... 50 Batterer’s Treatment ........................................................................................................................................ 55 CalFresh (Food Stamps Assistance) ................................................................................................................ 57 Child Care ........................................................................................................................................................ 61 Clothing, Food, Laundry, Showers, Utility Assistance, Etc,. .......................................................................... 63 Counseling or Mental Health Assistance ........................................................................................................ 70 Cultural Diversity ............................................................................................................................................ 78 Drug Testing Centers ....................................................................................................................................... 84 Drinking Driver Programs PC1000 Drug Diversion ....................................................................................... 85 Educational Services ....................................................................................................................................... 87 Emergency Housing, Housing Assistances, & Section 8 Housing ................................................................. 91 Financial Management .................................................................................................................................... 99 Health Services .............................................................................................................................................. 100 Law Enforcement .......................................................................................................................................... 114 Native American Tribes in the Central Valley .............................................................................................. 118 Parenting Education ....................................................................................................................................... 121 Replacing Important Documents ................................................................................................................... 124 Supports Groups ............................................................................................................................................ 126 Transportation ................................................................................................................................................ 139 Transportation for Medical Fragile and/or Wheel Chair ............................................................................... 145 Tutoring/After School ................................................................................................................................... 150 Visitation Centers .......................................................................................................................................... 152 Women, Infant and Children (WIC) .............................................................................................................. 153 Youth: Career, Training, Mentoring & Recreational Services ...................................................................... 158 Services Approved by DSS, FCS, & Probation/Parole ................................................................................. 165 4 24 Hour Hotlines 2-1-1 United Way of Fresno County of Fresno www.unitedwayfresno.org Get Connected. Get Answers. Simply dial 2-1-1 find Health and Human services such as information on Fresno County Social Services, Homeless Prevention Programs, Food & Shelter Assistance, Help with Landlord-Tenant Issues, Employment Resources, Assistance with Medi-Cal & Food Stamps, Help with Care for Aging Parents, Youth & Parenting Resources, Health & Mental Health Services and Legal Services Referral. Return to Table of Contents Adult Protective Systems 2025 E. Dakota Fresno, Ca 93726 (559) 600-3383 http://www.co.fresno.ca.us/DepartmentPage.aspx?id=4532 The Adult Protective Services (APS) program provide emergency response and case management services aimed at preventing or correcting physical or emotional abuse, neglect, exploitation, or financial abuse of elders or dependent adults. Elder adults are defined as age 65 or older; dependent adults are defined as persons between the age of 18 and 64 who have physical or mental limitations which restrict their ability to carry out normal daily activities, or prohibit them from protecting themselves from abuse. Interpreters on call. Mailing address is P.O. Box 1912 Fresno, CA 93718. Return to Table of Contents Alcoholics Anonymous 2812 N. Blackstone Fresno, CA 93703 (559) 221-6907 English (24-Hour Hotline) www.fresnoaa.org Alcoholics Anonymous is a fellowship of men and women who share their experience, strength and hope with each other that they may solve their common problem and help others to recover from alcoholism. Return to Table of Contents ARC Central Valley American Red Cross 1300 W. Shaw Ave #4B Fresno, CA 93711 (559) 455-1000 http://www.redcross.org/ In addition to domestic disaster relief, the American Red Cross offers compassionate services in five other areas: community services that help the needy; support and comfort for military members and their families; the collection, processing and distribution of lifesaving blood and blood products; educational programs that promote health and safety; and international relief and development programs. Return to Table of Contents Boys Town National Hotline Parent Intervention 1-800-448-3000 http://www.boystown.org/ The Boys Town National Hotline’s specially trained counselors are available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year to offer parenting advice and assistance. These dedicated professionals receive ongoing training on how to deal with situations ranging from suicide to challenges parents encounter every day with their teens. Return to Table of Contents 5 Boys Town California 2223 E. Wellington Avenue, Suite 350 Santa Ana, CA 93701 (714) 558-0303 http://www.boystown.org/locations/california Boys Town developed its Integrated Continuum of Care as part of an ambitious, ongoing effort to expand the life-changing care we provide to children and families across the United States. The Continuum is unique to Boys Town and enables us to deliver the right care at the right time to troubled children and families who are edging toward crisis. Return to Table of Contents California Poison Control
Recommended publications
  • In the Sisters of Nazareth, Irish Region the National Board For

    In the Sisters of Nazareth, Irish Region the National Board For

    Review of Child Safeguarding Practice – Sisters of Nazareth Review of Child Safeguarding Practice in the Sisters of Nazareth, Irish Region undertaken by The National Board for Safeguarding Children in the Catholic Church in Ireland (NBSCCCI) Date: August 2016 Page 1 of 18 Review of Child Safeguarding Practice – Sisters of Nazareth CONTENTS Pages Background 3 Introduction 5 Role Profile 7 Profile of Members 7 Policy and Procedures Document 7 Structures 8 Management of Allegations 9 Conclusion 15 Terms of Reference 16 Page 2 of 18 Review of Child Safeguarding Practice – Sisters of Nazareth Background The National Board for Safeguarding Children in the Catholic Church in Ireland (NBSCCCI) was asked by the Sponsoring Bodies, namely the Irish Episcopal Conference, the Conference of Religious of Ireland and the Irish Missionary Union, to undertake a comprehensive review of child safeguarding practice within and across all the Church authorities on the island of Ireland. The NBSCCCI is aware that some religious congregations have ministries that involve direct contact with children while others do not. In religious congregations that have direct involvement with children, reviews of child safeguarding have been undertaken by measuring their practice compliance against all seven Church Standards. Where a religious congregation no longer has, or never had ministry involving children, and has not received any allegation of sexual abuse the NBSCCCI reviews are conducted using a shorter procedure. The size, age and activity profiles of religious congregations can vary significantly, and the NBSCCCI accepts that it is rational that the form of review be tailored to the profile of each Church Authority, where the ministry with children is limited or non-existent.
  • Mitigated Negative Declaration Parlier 1, 2, 3 – TCP Removal Treatment Systems

    Mitigated Negative Declaration Parlier 1, 2, 3 – TCP Removal Treatment Systems

    PREPARED FOR: MITIGATED NEGATIVE City of Parlier 1100 E. Parlier Avenue Parlier, CA 93648 DECLARATION PREPARED BY: Parlier 1, 2, 3 - TCP Removal Treatment Systems Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 113 N. Church Street, Suite 302 March 2019 Visalia, CA 93291 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Parlier 1, 2, 3 – TCP Removal Treatment Systems Prepared for: City of Parlier 1100 E. Parlier Avenue Parlier, CA 93648 Contact: Antonio Gastelum, City Manager (559) 646-3545 Prepared by: Crawford & Bowen Planning, Inc. 113 N. Church Street, Suite 302 Visalia, CA 93291 Contact: Travis Crawford, AICP (559) 840-4414 March 2019 Project Reference No. 026-1804 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Summary 1-1 1.2 Document Format 1-1 CHAPTER TWO – PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Location 2-1 2.2 Setting and Surrounding Land Uses 2-1 2.3 Project Background 2-2 2.4 Project Description 2-7 2.5 Objectives 2-10 2.6 Other Required Approvals 2-10 CHAPTER THREE – INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST 3-1 CHAPTER FOUR - MMRP 4-1 CHAPTER FIVE – PREPARERS 5-1 LIST OF FIGURES 1 – Regional Location Map 2-3 2 – First Component Location 2-4 3 – Second Component Location 2-5 4 – Third Component Location 2-6 5 – Component 1 Details 2-8 6 – Component 2 Details 2-9 LIST OF TABLES 1 – SJVAPCD Regulation VIII Control Measures 3-12 2 – Annual Significance Thresholds 3-15 3 – Proposed Project Construction and Operation Emissions 3-16 4 – Screening Levels for Potential Odor Sources 3-17 5 –Existing TCP Levels 3-49 6 – Typical Construction Vibration Levels 3-56 APPENDICES (UNDER SEPARATE COVER) A- CalEEMod Output Files B- Biological Evaluation Report C- Cultural Resources Inventory Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION Parlier 1, 2, 3 – TCP Removal Treatment Systems | Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Summary This document is the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration describing the potential environmental effects of implementing a series of improvements to the City of Parlier’s well and water system to remove 1, 2, 3 – Trichloropropane (TCP) from the City’s water.
  • Daily Eastern News: March 17, 1986 Eastern Illinois University

    Daily Eastern News: March 17, 1986 Eastern Illinois University

    Eastern Illinois University The Keep March 1986 3-17-1986 Daily Eastern News: March 17, 1986 Eastern Illinois University Follow this and additional works at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/den_1986_mar Recommended Citation Eastern Illinois University, "Daily Eastern News: March 17, 1986" (1986). March. 11. http://thekeep.eiu.edu/den_1986_mar/11 This is brought to you for free and open access by the 1986 at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in March by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Daily Eastern News fCharlestoh. llt. 61920 /Vol. 71, No. 126 /Two Sections, 20 Pages Reagan plea: Tell Congress to vote 'yes' President hard-sells need for Contra aid WASHINGTON (AP)-President Reagan, seeking public pressure on Congress to approve $ i 00 million in aid for "virtually defenseless" Nicaraguan rebels, declared Sunday evening that the funds are needed to "deny the Soviet Union a beachhead in North America." · · Beseeching Congress "to vote yes," Reagan emphasized his belief that "it is not Nicaragua alone that threatens us." In a televised address from the Oval office, he asked viewers, "TelLthem to help the freedom fighters. Help us prevent a Communist takeover of Central America.'' In prepared remarks, four days before the House Delta coaches preparation for the tug of war, part of this year's votes on his aid proposal, Reagan urged his coun­ Alpha Phi in upcoming Greek Week. trymen not to ignore "the malignancy in Managua until it spreads and becomes a mortal threat to the entire New World." e Sen. James Sassder, leading the Democratic rule could mean court battle response to Reagan, agreed with much of the LPHILPOTT home-rule units from imposing taxes upon the state.
  • Agenda Item – Staff Report

    Agenda Item – Staff Report

    AGENDA ITEM – STAFF REPORT TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND COMMISSIONERS FROM: JEFFREY O’NEAL, AICP, CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: APPLICATION NO. 20-23, THE VALLEY AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS, LLC COMMERCIAL CANNABIS PROJECT DATE: DECEMBER 29, 2020 ISSUE In the matter of Application No. 20-23, the Valley Agricultural Holdings LLC project, shall the Planning Commission: 1. Make a determination pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, make a determination of General Plan consistency for the disposal of real property, and approve a conditional use permit; and 2. Make recommendations to the City Council regarding a general plan amendment, rezone, and development agreement? BACKGROUND The State of California’s Medical and Adult Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) is the primary statute that regulates personal, medicinal, and commercial cannabis activity in the state. In addition to MAUCRSA, Chapters 8.37 (Commercial Cannabis Businesses) and 17.99 (Commercial Cannabis Overly District) of the Mendota Municipal Code (MMC) provide regulations applicable to non-personal cannabis activities at the local level. Pursuant to these local regulations, an applicant wishing to undertake commercial cannabis activities must meet certain location criteria, receive approval of a conditional use permit, and enter into a development agreement with the City. Dating to early 2019, the City has been in discussions with various entities regarding development of a commercial cannabis facility on a portion of a City-owned parcel (APN 013-030-68ST) adjacent to the City’s wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). In October 2019, the City entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Valley Agricultural Holdings, LLC. On October 13, 2020 the Planning Department received an application from Valley Agricultural Holdings, LLC requesting a variety of entitlements and actions to facilitate the construction and operation of a commercial cannabis facility as discussed.
  • Funding Formula Review and Recommendation: Final Report

    Funding Formula Review and Recommendation: Final Report

    Funding Formula Review and Recommendation: Final Report For more information, please contact: Tara Shabazz Alicia Stonebreaker Executive Director Program Coordinator California Partnership to California Partnership to End Domestic Violence End Domestic Violence Tel: (916) 444-7163 Tel: (916) 444-7163 [email protected] [email protected] 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 3 I. Background ....................................................................................................... 4 II. Funding Workgroup Process ............................................................................ 5 III. Funding Workgroup Discussion....................................................................... 6 IV. Funding Working Agreements and Guiding Principles .................................... 7 V. Funding Scenarios ........................................................................................... 8 VI. Approval Process ............................................................................................ 9 VII. Public Comment ............................................................................................. 9 VIII. Final Recommendations ............................................................................. 11 IX. Domestic Violence Funding Formula Work Group Evaluation ...................................................................................... 12 Appendix A: Current Cal EMA Funding Processes and Levels
  • Clean Energy Scorecard

    Clean Energy Scorecard

    The 2020 City Clean Energy Scorecard David Ribeiro, Stefen Samarripas, Kate Tanabe, Alexander Jarrah, Hannah Bastian, Ariel Drehobl, Shruti Vaidyanathan, Emma Cooper, Ben Jennings, and Nick Henner October 2020 I Report U2008 529 14th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20045 (202) 507-4000 I @ACEEEDC I @myACEEE I aceee.org Contents About the Authors .................................................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................................vi Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................8 Chapter 1. Methodology and Results ....................................................................................................................9 Goals and Approach ................................................................................................................................................9 Selection of Cities .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Scoring Method ......................................................................................................................................................11
  • Fresno-Commission-Fo

    Fresno-Commission-Fo

    “If you are working on a problem you can solve in your lifetime, you’re thinking too small.” Wes Jackson I have been blessed to spend time with some of our nation’s most prominent civil rights leaders— truly extraordinary people. When I listen to them tell their stories about how hard they fought to combat the issues of their day, how long it took them, and the fact that they never stopped fighting, it grounds me. Those extraordinary people worked at what they knew they would never finish in their lifetimes. I have come to understand that the historical arc of this country always bends toward progress. It doesn’t come without a fight, and it doesn’t come in a single lifetime. It is the job of each generation of leaders to run the race with truth, honor, and integrity, then hand the baton to the next generation to continue the fight. That is what our foremothers and forefathers did. It is what we must do, for we are at that moment in history yet again. We have been passed the baton, and our job is to stretch this work as far as we can and run as hard as we can, to then hand it off to the next generation because we can see their outstretched hands. This project has been deeply emotional for me. It brought me back to my youthful days in Los Angeles when I would be constantly harassed, handcuffed, searched at gunpoint - all illegal, but I don’t know that then. I can still feel the terror I felt every time I saw a police cruiser.
  • Distribution List

    Distribution List

    table of contents Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Distribution List Distribution List The lists that follow show tribes, federal, state, and local government agencies, elected officials, and libraries who were on the mailing list to receive the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Record of Decision as of December 11, 2000. In November 2000 the 15,000 people and organizations on the Sierra Nevada Framework Project mailing list were sent a return postcard by which they could request a copy of the Final EIS. As of December 11, 2000 the Forest Service had received approximately 1300 requests. FEIS Volume 1, Distribution List Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Distribution List California and Nevada Tribes Rancheria (Tribe) Local Office Name Last Name First Name Title Big Sandy Rancheria Baty Loren Chairman BIA Office Western Nevada Field Office Hunter Robert L Chairman Cedarville Rancheria Northern California Agency Lash Virginia Chairperson Choinumni Choinumni Tribe Alec Stanley Chairman Eel River Blue Lake Rancheria Brundin Claudia Chairperson Maidu Chico Rancheria Ward Arlene Chairperson Maidu Enterprise Rancheria Angle Harvey Chairman Maidu Greenville Rancheria Timmons Angela Chairman Maidu Maidu Nation Lecompte Clara Chairperson Maidu Mooretown Rancheria Pursia Shirley Chairperson Me-Wuk Tuolumne Me-Wuk Rancheria Kevin Day Sonny Chairman Miwok Buena Vista Rancheria Potts Donna Marie Spokesperson Miwok Calaveras Band of Miwok Indians Jeff Virginia Spokesperson Miwok Ione Band of Miwok
  • In the Recent Dear Colleague Letter 99-30, OCSE Notified You of A

    In the Recent Dear Colleague Letter 99-30, OCSE Notified You of A

    Location Codes Workgroup FIPS Coding Scheme Recommendation Summary Position 1 Position 2 Positions 3-5 Interstate Case FIPS State Identifier County/Functional Entity 9 0 BIA Tribe Identifier Tribal Case (Federally recognized) 8 0 ISO Country Identifier International Case Exception 0-9, A-Z (Canada – sub- jurisdiction) Tribal and International Case Location Codes 1 OCSE Case Locator Code Data Standards Tribal locator codes coding scheme Tribal Case Locator Codes • Classification code - 9 in position 1 • “0”(zero) in position 2 • Tribe Identification - BIA code in positions 3-5 Example: Chickasaw Nation 90906 • Addresses for tribal grantees– provided by tribes to IRG staff List of current tribal grantees: http://ocse.acf.hhs.gov/int/directories/index.cfm?fuseaction=main.tribalivd • Link to tribal government addresses web site: http://www.doi.gov/leaders.pdf 11/15/2006 2 OCSE Case Locator Code Data Standards Tribal Identification Codes Code Name 001 Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians of North Carolina 006 Onondaga Nation of New York 007 St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians of New York 008 Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians of New York 009 Tuscarora Nation of New York 011 Oneida Nation of New York 012 Seneca Nation of New York 013 Cayuga Nation of New York 014 Passamaquoddy Tribe of Maine 018 Penobscot Tribe of Maine 019 Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians of Maine 020 Mashantucket Pequot Tribe of Connecticut 021 Seminole Tribe of Florida, Dania, Big Cypress, Brighton, Hollywood & Tampa Reservations 026 Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida 027 Narragansett
  • Child Migration Programmes – Investigation Report March 2018

    Child Migration Programmes – Investigation Report March 2018

    Child Migration Programmes Investigation Report March 2018 2018 Child Migration Programmes Investigation Report March 2018 © Crown copyright 2017. This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/opengovernment-licence/version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.iicsa.org.uk. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected]. Contents Executive Summary vii Part A. Introduction 1 Part B. Child Sexual Abuse in the Child Migration Programmes 5 1 A brief history of child migration 6 2 Child migrants’ experiences of sexual abuse 10 3 The Inquiry’s approach to the ‘standards’ issues 17 4 Evolution of the institutional response 25 Part C. Detailed Examination of Institutional Responses 43 1 Her Majesty’s Government 47 1.1 What was HMG’s role in child migration? 48 1.2 What did HMG know about sexual abuse of child migrants and what did it do about it? 49 1.3 Did HMG take sufficient care to protect child migrants from sexual abuse? 55 1.4 What has HMG done in the post-migration period? 60 2 The response of ‘sending’ Institutions 65 2.1 Barnardo’s 65 2.2 The Fairbridge Society 77 2.3 The Children’s Society 98 2.4 The National Children’s Home 104 2.5 The Royal Overseas League 109 2.6 Cornwall County Council 113 2.7 The Salvation Army UK 116 2.8 The Church of England Advisory Council for Empire Settlement 120 2.9 The Sisters of Nazareth 122 2.10 Father Hudson’s 127 2.11 The Catholic Church 132 Part D.
  • Challenges of Change Faith, Gender, and Development

    Challenges of Change Faith, Gender, and Development

    BERKLEY CENTER for RELIGION, PEACE & WORLD AFFAIRS GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY 2008 | Challenges of Change Faith, Gender, and Development A project of the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs and the Edmund A. Walsh School BERKLEY CENTER REPORTS of Foreign Service at Georgetown University Supported by the Henry R. Luce Initiative on Religion and International Affairs The Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service Founded in 1919 to educate students and prepare them for leadership roles in international affairs, the School of Foreign Service conducts an undergraduate program for over 1,300 students and graduate programs at the Master’s level for more than 700 students. Under the leadership of its Dean, Robert L. Gallucci, the School houses more than a dozen regional and functional programs that offer courses, conduct research, host events, and contribute to the intellectual development of the field of international affairs. In 2007,Foreign Policy magazine ranked the School’s graduate programs first in the nation. The Berkley Center The Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs, created within the Office of the President in March 2006, is part of a university-wide effort to build knowledge about religion’s role in world affairs and promote interreligious 2008 understanding in the service of peace. Through research, teaching, and outreach activities, the Center explores the | intersection of religion with four global challenges: diplomacy and transnational relations, democracy and human rights, global development, and interreligious dialogue. Thomas Banchoff, Associate Professor in the Department of Government and the School of Foreign Service, is the Center’s first director.
  • Draft Fresno County Regional Long‐Range Transit Plan

    Draft Fresno County Regional Long‐Range Transit Plan

    January 2019 Draft Draft Fresno County Regional Long‐Range Transit Plan January 28, 2019 Prepared For: 2035 Tulare Street, Suite 201 Fresno, CA 93721 Ph: (559) 233‐4148 Fax: (559) 233‐9654 Prepared By: 4630 W. Jennifer, Suite 105 Fresno, CA 93722 Ph: (559) 271‐1200 Fax: (559) 271‐1269 Fresno Council of Governments Fresno County Regional Long-Range Transit Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I. Introduction: The LRTP Vision and Goals ........................................................................ 2 Background, Purpose, and Need for the LRTP ......................................................................................... 2 Looking Beyond the RTP/SCS Horizon: Key RTP/SCS Plan Elements ........................................................ 2 Vision, Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures for the Fresno LRTP ........................................... 4 Chapter II. Prior Transit Planning in the Region ............................................................................... 8 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 8 Existing Transit Plan Review ..................................................................................................................... 8 General Plan Review ............................................................................................................................... 36 Chapter III. Public Outreach ..........................................................................................................