DOCSLIB.ORG

Geologic Reservoir Characterization of the Codell Sandstone: Central Wattenberg Field, Colorado

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geologic Reservoir Characterization of the Codell Sandstone: Central Wattenberg Field, Colorado GEOLOGIC RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CODELL SANDSTONE: CENTRAL WATTENBERG FIELD, COLORADO by John Stamer A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date ______________ Signed: _____________________________ John Stamer Signed: _____________________________ Dr. Stephen A. Sonnenberg Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date ______________ Signed: _____________________________ Dr. Paul Santi Professor and Department Head Department of Geology And Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT Colorado’s Wattenberg Field is a giant natural gas and oil field. Since its discovery in the 1970’s, the field ranks as the seventh largest domestic natural gas field in the United States, with cumulative production according to IHS 210 MMBo and 4.03 Tcf. The Codell serves as an important and highly productive reservoir in the area. The Late Turonian Codell Sandstone Member of the Carlile Shale is a zone which has produced almost exclusively from the Wattenberg Field since production from the formation began in 1981 with little to no success elsewhere in the basin until recent years. With advancements in multi-stage hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling there has been renewed interest in the development and continued exploration of the Codell Sandstone. This study is meant to focus on the geologic reservoir characterization of the Codell Sandstone in Wattenberg Field, and understand the future potential for the Codell play that remains untapped. The Codell Sandstone within Wattenberg Field is the low porosity (4-12%), low permeability (<0.1 mD) member of the Carlile Shale Formation. The sandstone was deposited on a shallow marine shelf below normal fair-weather storm wave base under low energy conditions. The Codell is the upper member of the Carlile Formation and unconformably overlies the lower Carlile Shales or the Greenhorn Marlstones and is unconformably overlain by the Fort Hays Member of the Niobrara Formation. Within the study area the Greenhorn and Niobrara Formations are considered to be the main source beds for the Codell hydrocarbon accumulations. Throughout Wattenberg Field the Codell Sandstone contains three distinct facies. The first of which is highly bioturbated and thick (7-15 ft), and is found at the very top and very bottom parts of the sandstone and encapsulates the other two facies. Facies #2 is thinner (1-10 ft) containing clay laminae with sand-filled burrows, and is found in the middle part of the Codell. iii The third facies, facies 3, is the most distinct of the three with low angle (hummocks) cross- stratification. In total the three facies of the Codell are on average 10 to 30 ft thick. High clay content, sometimes exceeding 25%, within the Codell Sandstone lead to the low permeability and low resistivity observed. Within the study area the Codell is classified as a “tight” oil and gas sand, with a dual porosity system. Hydrocarbon entrapment in the Codell Sandstone is due to a combination of low permeability, stratigraphic compartmentalization, structural compartmentalization, and clay smearing in faults. This makes the Codell play a combination play, with areas of continuous accumulation along with some areas of discontinuous accumulations. High temperature and pressure anomalies, as well, coincide with increased production rates within the Central Wattenberg Field. The future of the play will see increased horizontal drilling on closer spacing, and more precisely designed hydraulic fracture stimulations with multiple stages. In the long run there will be lower drilling and completion costs, which will make the play as profitable as possible. The culmination of this entire study can be a basis for future exploration around the world. Identifying tight, bioturbated, shelf-deposited sandstones and using the conclusion drawn from this study to aid in their economic success. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………...............iii LIST OF FIGURES...………………………………………………………………...…………viii LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………................xvi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...…………………………………………………………................xvii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION...………………………….………………………………….…1 1.1 Study Objectives……………………………………………………………………....6 1.2 Study Area…………………………………………………………………………….6 1.3 Methods and Purpose………………………………………………………………….8 CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND GEOLOGY...…….………………………….…………………11 2.1 Geologic Overview…………………………………………………………………..11 2.2 Tectonics……………………………………………………………………………..17 2.3 Sedimentation………………………………………………………………………..20 CHAPTER 3 CORES.…………….……………………………………………………………..23 3.1 Facies Description……………………………………………………..……………..24 3.2 PetroQuest State B-41-36……………………………………………………………31 3.3 Dome Petroleum Franks #1-13……………………………………………………....35 3.4 Brooks Harrington #2-30…………………………………………………………….41 3.5 Discussion……………………………………………………………………………47 CHAPTER 4 PETROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS..……………….………………………...............48 4.1 PetroQuest State B-41-36……………………………………………………………49 4.2 Dome Petroleum Franks #1-13………………………………………………………54 4.3 Brooks Harrington #2-30…………………………………………………………….63 v 4.4 Discussion……………………………………………………………………………66 CHAPTER 5 PORE ANALYSIS…………………….………………………………………….68 5.1 FESEM Description………………………………………………………………….68 5.2 MICP Analysis……………………………………………………………………….78 CHAPTER 6 SUBSURFACE MAPPING.……….……………………………………………..85 6.1 Introduction and Methods……………………………………………………………85 6.2 Codell Structure and Isopach………………………………………………...............86 6.3 Resistivity and Porosity……………………………………………………...............91 6.4 Pressure and Temperature……………………………………………………………94 6.5 Pay Isopach…………………………………………………………………………..97 CHAPTER 7 OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION AND ECONOMICS..…….……………………98 7.1 Reservoir……………………………………………………………………………..98 7.2 Source………………………………………………………………………………102 7.3 Migration and Impedance…………………………………………………………..108 7.4 Production…………………………………………………………………………..111 7.4.1 Wattenberg Field………………………………………………………….111 7.4.2 Codell Sandstone, Central Wattenberg Field……………………………..115 7.5 Completion………………………………………………………………………….120 7.5.1 Historical Industry Standard Techniques…………………………………120 7.5.2 Hydraulic Re-Fracture Stimulation……………………………………….125 7.6 Horizontal versus Vertical Wells…………………………………………………...127 7.6.1 Production………………………………………………………………...128 7.6.2 Economics………………………………………………………………...131 vi 7.7 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………..135 CHAPTER 8 CONCLUSIONS..……………………………………………………………….137 CHAPTER 9 RECOMMENDATION FOR FUTURE WORK.……………………………….141 REFRENCES CITED..…………………………………………………....…………………....143 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1: Modified from Sonnenberg (2015). Stratigraphic column for the Denver Basin. Depths in feet on the right, and source rock along with reservoirs labeled on the left. .......2 Figure 1-2: Modified from Encana (2011). Wells drilled in a section. 32 acre spacing led to 5 wells per quarter section for a total of 20 wells per section. On the right Rule 318A showing 20 acre spacing leading to 8 wells per quarter section for a total of 32 wells producing form the same formation per section. .................................................................3 Figure 1-3: Map displaying all Codell wells that have been drilled in the Wattenberg Field. Wattenberg Field outlined and labeled in red. Major cities are outlined and labeled. ........4 Figure 1-4: Daily production rates for the Wattenberg Field from 1970 until present. Oil rates on the left are colored in green while gas rates on the right are colored in red. Information comes from IHS Enerdeq. ....................................................................................................5 Figure 1-5: Location map showing the outline of the Wattenberg Field labeled and outlined in red and Central Wattenberg Field in blue. Cities are outlined and labeled. ........................7 Figure 1-6: Map displaying names and locations of the three cores used in this thesis. Codell producing wells are displayed along with the outline of the CWF, and the city of Greeley, CO ........................................................................................................................................7 Figure 2-1: Probable distribution of land and sea in North America during late Cretaceous time showing where the epeiric seaway divided Notrth America. The Wattenberg Field is located in the west central portion of the seaway (modified from Gill & Cobban, 1973).12 Figure 2-2: Structural cross section across the Wattenberg Field. Showing gently dipping structure from East to West until a steep uplift due to the Laramide Orogeny. The approximate top of the oil window is shown, with the Codell within the mature hydrocarbon generation zonein the Wattenberg Field. (Modified from Sonnenberg, 2015).13 Figure 2-3: Distribution of the Codell Sandstone. The three different types are shown within the Denver Basin. The “Codell Play” is essentially the outline of the Wattenberg Field. (Modified from Weimer & Sonnenberg, 1983) .................................................................15 Figure 2-4: Greater Wattenberg Area outlined, showing the Wattenberg thermal anomaly and its position relative to the Colorado Mineral Belt. Major wrench faults and other fault systems are also shown. (Modified from Birmingham , 2006)..........................................16 Figure 2-5: From Panigoro (1988) after Schedl and Wiltschko (1984). The relationship between tectonic events and the facies distribution is shown in the Idaho
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hydraulic Fracturing Ban, the Economic
    HYDRAULIC FRACTURING BAN The Economic Impact of a Statewide Fracking Ban in Colorado Conducted by: Richard Wobbekind Brian Lewandowski Editor: Cindy DiPersio Student Research Assistants: Jim Dalton, Rick Brubaker, Noah Seidenfeld, and Ryan Thorpe Business Research Division Leeds School of Business University of Colorado Boulder 420 UCB Boulder, CO 80309-0420 Telephone: 303.492.3307 leeds.colorado.edu/brd March 2014 i Business Research Division The Business Research Division (BRD) of the Leeds School of Business at the University of Colorado Boulder has been serving Colorado since 1915. The BRD conducts economic impact studies and customized research projects that assist companies, associations, nonprofits, and government agencies with making informed business and policy decisions. Among the information offered to the public are the annual Colorado Business Economic Outlook Forum— now in its 49th year—which provides a forecast of the state’s economy by sector, and the quarterly Leeds Business Confidence Index, which gauges Colorado business leaders’ opinions about the national and state economies and how their industry will perform in the upcoming quarter. The Colorado Business Review is a quarterly publication that offers decision makers industry-focused analysis and information as it relates to the Colorado economy. BRD researchers collaborate with faculty researchers on projects, and graduate and undergraduate student assistants, who provide research assistance and gain valuable hands-on experience. Visit us at: www.leeds.colorado.edu/brd
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska: Early Frustrations Led to Later Success by ROSS COEN
    EXPLORER 2 JUNE 2014 WWW.AAPG.ORG Vol. 35, No. 6 June 2014 EXPLORER PRESIDENT’SCOLUMN Doing What We Said We’d Do – Well, Did We? BY LEE F. KRYSTINIK The end of the “doing what we say we of daily business that have been dealt with, do” theme has arrived – but not the end but these are some of the larger issues of doing what we say we will do at AAPG! addressed by the EC this year. We must work much more I wish to thank Randi Martinsen, our ell, much as promised by my effectively at showing our relevance president-elect, along with Richard Ball predecessors, the year indeed has (secretary), Tom Ewing (vice president- Wflown by quickly and this is my last within geoscience – perhaps most Sections), John Kaldi (vice president- column to you as president. Soon, I will find especially to the public. Regions), Deborah Sacrey (treasurer), Mike myself with more time to explore for oil and Sweet (editor) and Larry Wickstrom (HoD gas and get back to riding my horse – if he chair), who all served on this year’s EC KRYSTINIK still recognizes me. with distinction, hard work and exceptional So did we actually accomplish what we u Advisory Council Initiatives – The AAPG I offer congratulations to all of our professionalism. They have done a great job set out to do this year? House of Delegates reached a consensus volunteers and staff who have worked so for AAPG this year! This year’s Executive Committee and passed a revision of the sponsorship diligently to create this additional surplus! Huge thanks also to David Curtiss, addressed a broad range of
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Along the Front Range in the Denver Basin of Colorado, Nebraska, and Wyoming by Debra K
    Chapter 2 Oil and Gas Exploration and Development along the Front Range in the Denver Basin of Colorado, Nebraska, and Wyoming By Debra K. Higley and Dave O. Cox Chapter 2 of Petroleum Systems and Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas in the Denver Basin Province, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Wyoming—USGS Province 39 Compiled by Debra K. Higley U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS–69–P U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1–888–ASK–USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone:1–888–ASK–USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Higley, D.K., Cox, D.O., 2007, Oil and gas exploration and development along the front range in the Denver Basin of Colorado, Nebraska, and Wyoming, in Higley, D.K., compiler, Petroleum systems and assessment of undiscovered oil and gas in the Denver Basin Province, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Wyoming—USGS Province 39: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Controlling Source and Reservoir Characteristics in the Niobrara Shaleoil System, Denver Basin
    Originally published as: Han, Y., Horsfield, B., Mahlstedt, N., Wirth, R., Curry, D. J., LaReau, H. (2019): Factors controlling source and reservoir characteristics in the Niobrara shaleoil system, Denver Basin. - AAPG Bulletin, 103, 9, pp. 2045—2072. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1306/0121191619717287 Q:1 Factors controlling source and AUTHORS Yuanjia Han ~ 1 German Research Centre reservoir characteristics in the for Geosciences (GFZ), Telegrafenberg, Potsdam, Germany; Key Laboratory of 2 Niobrara shale oil system, Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China; 3 Q:2 Denver Basin [email protected]; hanyj@cug. edu.cn 4 Yuanjia Han, Brian Horsfield, Nicolaj Mahlstedt, Yuanjia Han is a junior professor at China 5 Richard Wirth, David J. Curry, and Heather LaReau University of Geosciences, focusing primarily on hydrocarbon retention and migration processes in unconventional shale systems. He obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees from 6 ABSTRACT China University of Geosciences and a Ph.D. from the Technical University of Berlin, both 7 This paper clarifies the controls of oil retention in the Niobrara with specialization in integrated petroleum 8 Formation, Denver Basin, in the western United States. Sweet systems analysis. He is the corresponding author. 9 spots have been recognized using a total of 98 core samples from Brian Horsfield ~ 10 5 wells with maturities covering the oil window. Section on Organic Geochemistry, GFZ, Telegrafenberg, 11 Oil retention in the source rock samples (carbonate content Potsdam, Germany; [email protected] 12 <70 wt. %) is controlled by organic matter richness and thermal fi 13 Q:6 maturity.
    [Show full text]
  • GREATER WATTENBERG AREA, DENVER BASIN, COLORADO By
    PETROLEUM POTENTIAL OF THE GRANEROS-GREENHORN PETROLEUM SYSTEM: GREATER WATTENBERG AREA, DENVER BASIN, COLORADO by Craig Kaiser i A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date 4"4- /a Craig Kaiser Signed: Dr. Stephen Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado signed: i,4'\ B. &Ldc{, ta4 doue oute 4-2-12 Dr. John Curtis Thesis Co-Advisor Dr. John Flfmphrey Geology and Geological Engineering ABSTRACT Interest in unconventional petroleum potential of the Late Cretaceous Greenhorn and Graneros formations has drastically increased due to success of many producers in the stratigraphically higher, but mineralogically similar Niobrara Formation. Previous Greenhorn and Graneros research has mainly focused on depositional cyclicity and stratigraphic controls rather than describing hydrocarbon potential within these two intervals. The focus of this study is to examine petroleum potential of these two organic- rich formations within the greater Wattenberg area of the Denver Basin. The two formations represent regional transgression in the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway where large amounts of organic-rich calcareous sediment were deposited throughout much of the North American Mid-Continent. The ratio of carbonate to siliciclastic sedimentation increased as the transgression took place and water depths deepened, resulting in the lower Graneros Formation predominantly consisting of shales and marls and the higher Greenhorn Formation mainly consisting of marls and chalks. Geochemical analysis of organic-rich shales and marls within the two source units (Graneros Formation and Hartland Member of the Greenhorn Formation) indicate that significant amounts of hydrocarbons have been generated within the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Petroleum System- Status of Research and Methods, 1992
    The Petroleum System­ Status of Research and Methods, 1992 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2007 PfTROLEUM SYSTEM DEFINITION A petroleum system encompasses a mature hydrocarbon source-rock and all generated oil and gas accumulations and in­ cludes all the geologic elements and processes that are essential if an oil and gas deposit is to exist. Petroleum includes high concentrations of any of the following substances: thermal and microbial natural gas found in conventional reservoirs as well as in gas hydrate, tight reservoirs, fractured shale, and coal; and condensates, crude oils, heavy oils, and solid bitumen found in reser­ voirs, generally in siliciclastic and carbonate rocks. System describes the interdependent elements and processes that form the functional unit that creates hydrocarbon accumulations. The elements include a petroleum source rock, reservoir rock, seal rock, and overburden rock whereas the processes are trap formation and the generation, migration, and accumulation of hydrocarbons. These essential elements and processes must be correctly placed in time and space so that organic matter included in a source rock can be converted into a petroleum deposit. A petroleum system exists wherever all these essential elements and processes are known to occur or are thought to have a reasonable chance or probability to occur. Characteristics and Limits.-The areal, stratigraphic, and temporal extent of the petroleum system is specific, as depicted in figures 1 to 4 for the Deer-Boar(.) petroleum system. The figures are as follows: a burial history chart depicts the critical moment (defined below) and the essential elements; a map and a cross section drawn at the critical moment depicts the spatial relation of the essential elements; and a petroleum system events chart shows the temporal relation of the essential elements and processes, and shows the duration time and the preservation time for the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Depletion Analysis Denver-Julesburg Basin Northeast Colorado
    FINAL REPORT STREAM DEPLETION ANALYSIS DENVER-JULESBURG BASIN NORTHEAST COLORADO Prepared for The Denver-Julesburg Operators Group Prepared by URS Corporation in conjuction with The Denver-Julesburg Operators Group and Dr. Robert J. Weimer and Dr. David T. Snow November 4, 2009 URS Corporation 8181 E. Tufts Avenue Denver, CO 80237 22241252.50000 004471 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 ONE Introduction.....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Nontributary Ground Water Evaluation of Denver-Julesburg Basin Formations ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Dual Modeling and Geologic/Hydrologic Analyses................................ 1-2 1.3 Delineated Nontributary Ground Water Areas ........................................ 1-3 Section 2 TWO General Geology of the DJ Basin..................................................................................2-1 2.1 Physiography............................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Geology.................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Geologic History.......................................................................... 2-1 2.2.2 General Stratigraphy.................................................................... 2-2 2.3 History of Hydrocarbon Development In the DJ Basin........................... 2-7 Section 3 THREE Geologic and Hydrologic
    [Show full text]
  • Snowbird, Utah
    Sponsors Sponsorship for RMS-AAPG 2007 Annual Meeting The Rocky Mountain Section of the AAPG and the Utah Geological Association gratefully acknowledge the contributions of these sponsors. The financial success of this meeting depends on corporate sponsorship. Any proceeds will be returned to the Rocky Mountain Section and its affiliated geologic societies assuring that successful conferences will continue in the future. Please read through the list of sponsors and express your appreciation to them as you enjoy the meeting. TCF Level International Petroleum LLC Shell Exploration & Production Co. BCF Level Hess Corp. Questar Exploration & Production Co. 2007 ROCKY MOUNTAIN SECTION Sponsors MMCF Level Anadarko Petroleum Corp. Bill Barrett Corp. BP Inc. ConocoPhillips Petroleum EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. Flying J Inc. John C. Osmond, Consultant Petrobank Energy & Resources Ltd. PGS Onshore Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. TerraTek – A Schlumberger Co. Titan Energy Resources WellDog Inc. Williams Production Co. MCF Level Berry Petroleum Co. Cabot Oil & Gas Co. Core Laboratories EOG Resources Inc. GeoX Consulting Inc. Lario Oil & Gas Co. Nance Petroleum Corp. Pason Systems Inc. Petroleum Systems International Samson Resources School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration The Discovery Group Inc. URS Corp. Wyoming Geological Association 1 2007 ROCKY MOUNTAIN SECTION Organizers Convention Committee Chairs General Chair Paul B. Anderson Finance Roger Bon Technical Program Co-Chair David Lambert Technical Program Co-Chair Richard Newhart Short Courses Michael Laine Field Trips Brad Hill Exhibit Hall Craig Morgan Publicity Stephanie Carney Registration Greg Wood Awards Forrest Terrell Judging Carl Kendell Guest Activities Tina Blake Social Events Jason Blake Volunteers Jessica Allen Sponsorship Kurt Reisser Convention Signs Michael Vanden Berg “Rocks in Your Head” Coordinator Sandy Eldredge Advisor Thomas C.
    [Show full text]
  • '%%- Rocky Mountain Geology & Energy Resources Conference
    GD8@NBDJCI6>C '%%- :C:G<NHJBB>I ?JAN.Ä&& :K:CIH 9:CK:G!8D 8dadgVYd8dckZci^dc8ZciZg Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Strategy Rocky Mountain Natural Geology & Conference & Investment ForumGeology & EnergyEnergy Resources Conference Presented by Colorado Oil & Gas AssociationResources ConferencePresented by Rocky Mountain Section AAPG Presented by Rocky Mountain Section AAPG Rocky Mountain Section Hosted by Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists Held in conjunction with Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Strategy Conference & Investment Forum Presented by Colorado Oil & Gas Association July 9 through 11, 2008 • Colorado Convention Center Early Registration Discounts end May 23 2008 Rocky Mountain Section Meeting GD8@NBDJCI6>C Schedule at a Glance '%%- :C:G<NHJBB>I ?JAN.Ä&& :K:CIH 9:CK:G!8D Welcome to 8dadgVYd8dckZci^dc8ZciZgthe 57th an- All events will be held at the Colorado Convention Center unless otherwise noted. Check the Rocky Mountain Energy Epicenter website (www.epicenter2008.org) for the most current Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Strategy nualRocky meeting Mountain Natural of the Geology Rocky & Conference & Investment Forum Energy Resources Conference information. Presented by Colorado Oil & Gas Association MountainPresented by RockySection Mountain Section of AAPGAme- rican Association of Petro- Registration Hours leum Geologists! For the Tuesday, July 8 1:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. COGA Golf Tournament Bear Dance Golf Club third time since 2004, the Wednesday, July 9 7:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. Rocky Mountain geoscience Thursday, July 10 7:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. Monday, July 7 community is combining Friday, July 11 7:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. 7:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Wattenberg Field, Denver Basin, Colorado'
    Wattenberg Field, Denver Basin, Colorado' R. A. MATUSZCZAK3 Abstract Wattenberg field produces from a large gas ac­ tion from the city of Boulder northward to a few cumulation (1.1 Tcf estimated recoverable reserves) in the miles south of Fort Collins. Haun (1963), Weimer "J" sandstone of Cretaceous age. The trap was formed in the delta-front environment of o northwesterly prograding (1970), and MacKenzie (1971) have provided ex­ delta. cellent studies that substantiate the presence of The gas is contained in a stratigraphic trap straddling the these delta lobes. A marine embayment crosses axis of the Denver basin. Reservoir characteristics are poor, the outcrop northwest of Denver, as indicated on and fracturing by artificial means is necessary to test a well. Figure 3. Large extensions to the field may be made in the future by following the trend of the delta-front environment. Industry Examination and evaluation of available data exploration efforts will be dependent on gas-price econom­ from old wells drilled on the Union Pacific Rail­ ics. road land (later optioned by Amoco Production Company) revealed the presence of a large area where all drill-stem tests or cores taken in the "J" INTRODUCTION sandstone had shows of gas. Core analyses of the Wattenberg gas field is located in the Colorado "J" sandstone were compared with those of the portion of the Denver basin. Its present area com­ Dakota Formation of the San Juan basin, which prises 978 sq mi (2,530 km2) lying between Den­ produces gas from very low-permeability sand­ ver and Greeley, Colorado (Fig.
    [Show full text]