Deviations from Generalized Equipartition in Confined, Laser

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Deviations from Generalized Equipartition in Confined, Laser Deviations from generalized Equipartition in Confined, Laser Cooled Atoms Gadi Afek,∗ Alexander Cheplev, Arnaud Courvoisier, and Nir Davidson Department of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel We observe a significant steady-state deviation from the generalized equipartition theorem, one of the pivotal results of classical statistical mechanics, in a system of confined, laser cooled atoms. We quantify this deviation, measure its dynamics and show that its steady state value quantifies the departure of non-thermal states from thermal equilibrium even for anharmonic confinement. In particular, we find that deviations from equipartition grow as the system dynamics becomes more anomalous. We present numerical simulations that validate the experimental data and reveal an inhomogeneous distribution of the kinetic energy through the system, supported by an analytical analysis of the phase space. The 100 year-old generalized equipartition theorem [1], In this Paper, we present a detailed experimental in- one of the cornerstones of classical statistical physics, re- vestigation of the steady-state deviation from equiparti- mains of great interest throughout various fields of re- tion for trapped, laser cooled atoms in contact with a search to this day [2–4]. It states that for a system in non-thermal heat bath, implemented by a 1D, dissipa- thermal equilibrium with a heat bath of temperature T , tive optical lattice. For completion, we also investigate for any generalized coordinate qi and Hamiltonian H: numerically the effect of anharmonicity of the confining potential on the dynamics and magnitude of this devia- ∂H q = δ k T (1) tion. Finally, as a basis for further work, we present a i ∂q ij B novel prediction of the position dependence of the local j kinetic energy for such confined Sisyphus cooled atoms, where kB is the Boltzmann constant, δij is a Kronecker supported by analytics and numerics. Delta and h...i denotes ensemble averaging. An immedi- ate result of this theorem is the well known equipartition theorem [5, 6], valid for degrees of freedom which ap- pear quadratically in the Hamiltonian, in which case the relation implies equipartition of energy among those de- grees of freedom. Other significant extensions have been Using the equipartition theorem to quantify departure from thermal equilibrium shown for finite sized systems [7], generalized Canoni- cal ensembles [8] and non-extensive thermodynamics [9]. While the equipartition theorem is strictly correct only Any departure of a 1D confined system with coordi- in thermal equilibrium, it was extended and applied to nates (x, p) and Hamiltonian H from thermal equilibrium other thermodynamic systems and observed to hold even can be parametrized using the Equipartition parameter outside of thermal equilibrium [10]. χ [34, 35]: Ultracold atomic systems have been pushing the un- derstanding of statistical physics for several decades, ∂H ∂H and have recently began to explore aspects of non- χ ≡ p x (2) ∂p ∂x equilibrium physics [11–15]. An especially interesting s system for probing non-equilibrium statistical mechanics is that of ultracold atomic ensembles in dissipative one- which depends explicitly on the details of the confining dimensional (1D) optical lattices, where the heat bath is potential. Given that χ = 1 for systems in thermal equi- implemented by the field of the lattice lasers. The main librium, deviations of χ from unity imply non-thermal advantage of such a system is the unique control over distributions and a possible break of energy-probability experimental parameters, allowing fine-tuning of the dy- equivalence. For the simple case of harmonic confine- arXiv:1909.07584v4 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 9 Feb 2020 namics. In addition to it being an experimentally and ment, one can derive the harmonic equipartition param- theoretically well established test bed for anomalous dy- eter χH from Eq. 2, namics [16–33], it has recently been linked with the no- σv tion of non-thermal equilibrium [34, 35]. Through exten- χH ≡ , (3) ωσx sive analysis of the phase space dynamics of such a system confined in a harmonic potential, a prediction has been where σx and σv are the respective standard deviations put forth of a violation, under certain conditions, of the of the position and velocity distributions (both of which equipartition theorem. are Gaussian for a harmonic potential and thermal equi- librium), and ω is the harmonic trap frequency. χH is a leading order approximation of χ for any continuous po- ∗ Present address: Wright Laboratory, Department of Physics, tential with a minimum, and is, in practice, considerably Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA easier to access experimentally than χ for many systems. 2 practically unaffected. The Rayleigh length of the beam is > 4 cm, much larger than any other relevant length (a) scale. Extra care is taken to avoid reflections that may cause interference affecting the dynamics. The > 2 sec long evaporation, much longer than the ∼ 100 msec collision time leaves the atoms in thermal equilibrium with the confining potential [36]. The atoms are then coupled for a duration t to a non-thermal heat bath, 20 implemented using a 1D dissipative Sisyphus lattice, where they may exhibit anomalous dynamics, depending on the modulation depth U0 [25, 33]. Set by the power 0 and detuning of the lattice beams from the relevant (b) atomic transition, U0 is the main control parameter of -20 the experiment. The other experimental parameters are 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 similar to those in [33]. The trap depth is ∼ 3 MHz, small compared to the ∼ 60 MHz detuning of the lattice, 0.15 32 (c) (d) rendering trap-induced differential AC stark shifts negli- 30 gible. Each measurement of the equipartition parameter 0.1 28 χH (U0,t) is comprised of three separate experiments: 0.05 trap oscillations, time of flight and extrapolation to zero 26 density of an in situ image of the cloud, giving access 0 24 to the information needed to calculate the equipartition 0 50 0 0.5 1 parameter of Eq. 3. The in situ absorption images are taken as the cloud is released from the trap, and capture both the atoms trapped in the focus, those held in the FIG. 1. Measurement scheme for the equipartition parameter, area of the beams removed from the overlapped focii. χH ≡ σv/ωσx. (a) A sketch of the experimental setup. Laser To ensure we do not wrongly include these atoms in our cooled 87Rb atoms are trapped in a crossed dipole trap (light analysis, we fit the data to a sum of two Gaussians and red) overlapped with a strong, single beam tube trap (bold use the narrower one [37]. red), and coupled to a non-thermal heat bath implemented by a set of 1D Sisyphus cooling lattice beams (orange) through Fig. 1 (b) shows a typical trap oscillation experiment, dichroic mirrors. The atoms propagate in this combined po- tential and are subsequently imaged. (b) The trapped cloud in which center of mass oscillations are excited using a is kicked with a short, directional pulse of near-resonant light short, near resonant light pulse. The atoms are sequen- to excite subsequent center of mass oscillations, and the cen- tially imaged as a function of the time elapsed after the ter of mass position is extracted (circles). Trap frequency pulse. The measured frequency is ω =2π × (332 ± 2) Hz ω is calculated by fitting the data to an exponentially de- (used throughout the Paper) with approximately 1.6 os- caying sine. The decay of the center of mass oscillations is cillations before 1/e decay of the contrast, attributed to attributed to anharmonicity of the confining potential. (c) dephasing of the ensemble-averaged oscillations due to Typical result of a time of flight experiment (circles), with a 2 2 2 2 the anharmonicity of the confining potential. The trap fit to σx(τ) = σx(τ = 0)+ σvτ (solid line). (d) Size of the frequency itself is unaffected by anharmonicity for atoms atomic cloud. Obtained by scanning the number of atoms, much colder than the trap depth. and hence density, in the trap and extrapolating to zero den- sity using microwave pulses (blue circles, see text). Solid line The width of the velocity distribution is measured us- is a linear fit. The data presented in (b-d) corresponds to ing time of flight. The cloud is released and allowed to measurements at thermal equilibrium, yielding the value of expand in one dimension for a time τ within the tube ± 2 2 χH = 0.82 0.02. trap. Its size is fitted with the relation σx(τ) = σx(τ = 2 2 0) + σv τ between the standard deviation of the spatial distribution σx(τ) and that of the velocity distribution Experimental σv. Fig. 1 (c) shows the result of such a measurement, giving σv = 42±1 mm/sec. We verify that scattered light In the experiment [Fig. 1 (a)], a cloud of 87Rb atoms from the unidirectional tube trap does not affect the dy- is magneto-optically trapped and then cooled down namics substantially by allowing the atoms to expand in to a temperature of ∼ 20µK. The final cooling step is it for a relatively long time (> 100 msec, much longer optical evaporation in a far detuned, 1064 nm crossed than the duration of the experiment) and verifying that dipole trap focused down to a waist of 60µm overlapped the center of mass of the cloud does not shift due to scat- with a strong, ∼ 180W, single 1070 nm beam tube trap tering of trap photons by more than 1% compared to its (YLR-200-LP-AC-Y14, IPG photonics), loosely focused initial position. to a waist of 120µm to provide strong confinement in Measuring the in situ cloud size is challenging, mostly the radial direction while leaving the axial dynamics due to the optical density of the clouds, biasing the 3 output of our absorption imaging.
Recommended publications
  • Equipartition of Energy
    Equipartition of Energy The number of degrees of freedom can be defined as the minimum number of independent coordinates, which can specify the configuration of the system completely. (A degree of freedom of a system is a formal description of a parameter that contributes to the state of a physical system.) The position of a rigid body in space is defined by three components of translation and three components of rotation, which means that it has six degrees of freedom. The degree of freedom of a system can be viewed as the minimum number of coordinates required to specify a configuration. Applying this definition, we have: • For a single particle in a plane two coordinates define its location so it has two degrees of freedom; • A single particle in space requires three coordinates so it has three degrees of freedom; • Two particles in space have a combined six degrees of freedom; • If two particles in space are constrained to maintain a constant distance from each other, such as in the case of a diatomic molecule, then the six coordinates must satisfy a single constraint equation defined by the distance formula. This reduces the degree of freedom of the system to five, because the distance formula can be used to solve for the remaining coordinate once the other five are specified. The equipartition theorem relates the temperature of a system with its average energies. The original idea of equipartition was that, in thermal equilibrium, energy is shared equally among all of its various forms; for example, the average kinetic energy per degree of freedom in the translational motion of a molecule should equal that of its rotational motions.
    [Show full text]
  • Fastest Frozen Temperature for a Thermodynamic System
    Fastest Frozen Temperature for a Thermodynamic System X. Y. Zhou, Z. Q. Yang, X. R. Tang, X. Wang1 and Q. H. Liu1, 2, ∗ 1School for Theoretical Physics, School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China 2Synergetic Innovation Center for Quantum Effects and Applications (SICQEA), Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081, China For a thermodynamic system obeying both the equipartition theorem in high temperature and the third law in low temperature, the curve showing relationship between the specific heat and the temperature has two common behaviors: it terminates at zero when the temperature is zero Kelvin and converges to a constant value of specific heat as temperature is higher and higher. Since it is always possible to find the characteristic temperature TC to mark the excited temperature as the specific heat almost reaches the equipartition value, it is also reasonable to find a temperature in low temperature interval, complementary to TC . The present study reports a possibly universal existence of the such a temperature #, defined by that at which the specific heat falls fastest along with decrease of the temperature. For the Debye model of solids, below the temperature # the Debye's law manifest itself. PACS numbers: I. INTRODUCTION A thermodynamic system usually obeys two laws in opposite limits of temperature; in high temperature the equipar- tition theorem works and in low temperature the third law of thermodynamics holds. From the shape of a curve showing relationship between the specific heat and the temperature, the behaviors in these two limits are qualitatively clear: in high temperature it approaches to a constant whereas it goes over to zero during the temperature is lowering to the zero Kelvin.
    [Show full text]
  • Exercise 18.4 the Ideal Gas Law Derived
    9/13/2015 Ch 18 HW Ch 18 HW Due: 11:59pm on Monday, September 14, 2015 To understand how points are awarded, read the Grading Policy for this assignment. Exercise 18.4 ∘ A 3.00­L tank contains air at 3.00 atm and 20.0 C. The tank is sealed and cooled until the pressure is 1.00 atm. Part A What is the temperature then in degrees Celsius? Assume that the volume of the tank is constant. ANSWER: ∘ T = ­175 C Correct Part B If the temperature is kept at the value found in part A and the gas is compressed, what is the volume when the pressure again becomes 3.00 atm? ANSWER: V = 1.00 L Correct The Ideal Gas Law Derived The ideal gas law, discovered experimentally, is an equation of state that relates the observable state variables of the gas­­pressure, temperature, and density (or quantity per volume): pV = NkBT (or pV = nRT ), where N is the number of atoms, n is the number of moles, and R and kB are ideal gas constants such that R = NA kB, where NA is Avogadro's number. In this problem, you should use Boltzmann's constant instead of the gas constant R. Remarkably, the pressure does not depend on the mass of the gas particles. Why don't heavier gas particles generate more pressure? This puzzle was explained by making a key assumption about the connection between the microscopic world and the macroscopic temperature T . This assumption is called the Equipartition Theorem. The Equipartition Theorem states that the average energy associated with each degree of freedom in a system at T 1 k T k = 1.38 × 10−23 J/K absolute temperature is 2 B , where B is Boltzmann's constant.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 8 - Dec 2, 2013 Thermodynamics of Earth and Cosmos; Overview of the Course
    Physics 5D - Lecture 8 - Dec 2, 2013 Thermodynamics of Earth and Cosmos; Overview of the Course Reminder: the Final Exam is next Wednesday December 11, 4:00-7:00 pm, here in Thimann Lec 3. You can bring with you two sheets of paper with any formulas or other notes you like. A PracticeFinalExam is at http://physics.ucsc.edu/~joel/Phys5D The Physics Department has elected to use the new eCommons Evaluations System to collect end of the quarter instructor evaluations from students in our courses. All students in our courses will have access to the evaluation tool in eCommons, whether or not the instructor used an eCommons site for course work. Students will receive an email from the department when the evaluation survey is available. The email will provide information regarding the evaluation as well as a link to the evaluation in eCommons. Students can click the link, login to eCommons and find the evaluation to take and submit. Alternately, students can login to ecommons.ucsc.edu and click the Evaluation System tool to see current available evaluations. Monday, December 2, 13 20-8 Heat Death of the Universe If we look at the universe as a whole, it seems inevitable that, as more and more energy is converted to unavailable forms, the total entropy S will increase and the ability to do work anywhere will gradually decrease. This is called the “heat death of the universe”. It was a popular theme in the late 19th century, after physicists had discovered the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. Lord Kelvin calculated that the sun could only shine for about 20 million years, based on the idea that its energy came from gravitational contraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamic Temperature
    Thermodynamic temperature Thermodynamic temperature is the absolute measure 1 Overview of temperature and is one of the principal parameters of thermodynamics. Temperature is a measure of the random submicroscopic Thermodynamic temperature is defined by the third law motions and vibrations of the particle constituents of of thermodynamics in which the theoretically lowest tem- matter. These motions comprise the internal energy of perature is the null or zero point. At this point, absolute a substance. More specifically, the thermodynamic tem- zero, the particle constituents of matter have minimal perature of any bulk quantity of matter is the measure motion and can become no colder.[1][2] In the quantum- of the average kinetic energy per classical (i.e., non- mechanical description, matter at absolute zero is in its quantum) degree of freedom of its constituent particles. ground state, which is its state of lowest energy. Thermo- “Translational motions” are almost always in the classical dynamic temperature is often also called absolute tem- regime. Translational motions are ordinary, whole-body perature, for two reasons: one, proposed by Kelvin, that movements in three-dimensional space in which particles it does not depend on the properties of a particular mate- move about and exchange energy in collisions. Figure 1 rial; two that it refers to an absolute zero according to the below shows translational motion in gases; Figure 4 be- properties of the ideal gas. low shows translational motion in solids. Thermodynamic temperature’s null point, absolute zero, is the temperature The International System of Units specifies a particular at which the particle constituents of matter are as close as scale for thermodynamic temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetic Energy of a Free Quantum Brownian Particle
    entropy Article Kinetic Energy of a Free Quantum Brownian Particle Paweł Bialas 1 and Jerzy Łuczka 1,2,* ID 1 Institute of Physics, University of Silesia, 41-500 Chorzów, Poland; [email protected] 2 Silesian Center for Education and Interdisciplinary Research, University of Silesia, 41-500 Chorzów, Poland * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 December 2017; Accepted: 9 February 2018; Published: 12 February 2018 Abstract: We consider a paradigmatic model of a quantum Brownian particle coupled to a thermostat consisting of harmonic oscillators. In the framework of a generalized Langevin equation, the memory (damping) kernel is assumed to be in the form of exponentially-decaying oscillations. We discuss a quantum counterpart of the equipartition energy theorem for a free Brownian particle in a thermal equilibrium state. We conclude that the average kinetic energy of the Brownian particle is equal to thermally-averaged kinetic energy per one degree of freedom of oscillators of the environment, additionally averaged over all possible oscillators’ frequencies distributed according to some probability density in which details of the particle-environment interaction are present via the parameters of the damping kernel. Keywords: quantum Brownian motion; kinetic energy; equipartition theorem 1. Introduction One of the enduring milestones of classical statistical physics is the theorem of the equipartition of energy [1], which states that energy is shared equally amongst all energetically-accessible degrees of freedom of a system and relates average energy to the temperature T of the system. In particular, for each degree of freedom, the average kinetic energy is equal to Ek = kBT/2, where kB is the Boltzmann constant.
    [Show full text]
  • Equipartition Theorem - Wikipedia 1 of 32
    Equipartition theorem - Wikipedia 1 of 32 Equipartition theorem In classical statistical mechanics, the equipartition theorem relates the temperature of a system to its average energies. The equipartition theorem is also known as the law of equipartition, equipartition of energy, or simply equipartition. The original idea of equipartition was that, in thermal equilibrium, energy is shared equally among all of its various forms; for example, the average kinetic energy per degree of freedom in translational motion of a molecule should equal that in rotational motion. The equipartition theorem makes quantitative Thermal motion of an α-helical predictions. Like the virial theorem, it gives the total peptide. The jittery motion is random average kinetic and potential energies for a system at a and complex, and the energy of any given temperature, from which the system's heat particular atom can fluctuate wildly. capacity can be computed. However, equipartition also Nevertheless, the equipartition theorem allows the average kinetic gives the average values of individual components of the energy of each atom to be energy, such as the kinetic energy of a particular particle computed, as well as the average or the potential energy of a single spring. For example, potential energies of many it predicts that every atom in a monatomic ideal gas has vibrational modes. The grey, red an average kinetic energy of (3/2)kBT in thermal and blue spheres represent atoms of carbon, oxygen and nitrogen, equilibrium, where kB is the Boltzmann constant and T respectively; the smaller white is the (thermodynamic) temperature. More generally, spheres represent atoms of equipartition can be applied to any classical system in hydrogen.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Apr 2021 Quantum Molecular Gas . L16–1 the Free Quantum Molecular Gas General Considerations • Idea: We Want to Calculate
    11 apr 2021 quantum molecular gas . L16{1 The Free Quantum Molecular Gas General Considerations • Idea: We want to calculate the contribution to the heat capacity of a molecular gas arising from the fact that energy can be stored in the internal degrees of freedom of each molecule. The dynamics of the centers of mass of the N molecules will be treated classically, but, as we will see, we would not get results consistent with observations unless we treat the internal degrees of freedom quantum mechanically. • Molecular Hamiltonian: If the n atoms in each molecule are identical (the treatment can be generalized to the case of different atoms), and T is low enough that the atoms are only slightly displaced from their ∗ equilibrium positions ~qi = ~qi (i = 1; :::; n) and the probability of electron transitions to higher energy states PN can be neglected, we can use H = I=1 H1(q(I); p(I)), with single-molecule Hamiltonian n X ~p 2 H (q; p) = i + V (~q ; :::; ~q ) ; 1 2m 1 n i=1 n 3 2 ∗ 1 X X @ V 3 V (~q ; :::; ~q ) = V + u u + O(u ) ; 1 n 2 @q @q i,α j,β i; j=1 α, β=1 i,α j,β q=q∗ ∗ ∗ where V is the equilibrium value of the molecular potential energy, and the ui,α := qi,α − qi,α are the deviations of the configuration variables from their equilibrium values. If we now identify the 3n normal 2 modes for the system by diagonalizing the matrix @ V=@qi,α@qj,β, then in adapted coordinatesu ~s andp ~s, 3n X 1 K H = V ∗ + p~2 + s u~ 2 : 1 2m s 2 s s=1 • Heat capacity: This single-molecule Hamiltonian H1 is a sum of terms depending separately on center- of-mass, molecular orientation and deformation variables, meaning that the translational, rotational and vibrational degrees of freedom of each molecule are uncoupled.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's Physics
    Einstein’s Physics Atoms, Quanta, and Relativity Derived, explained, and appraised Ta-Pei Cheng University of Missouri - St. Louis Portland State University To be published by Oxford University Press 2013 Contents I ATOMIC NATURE OF MATTER 1 1 Molecular size from classical fluid 3 1.1 Two relations of molecular size and the Avogadro number . 4 1.2 The relation for the effective viscosity . 6 1.2.1 The equation of motion for a viscous fluid . 7 1.2.2 Viscosity and heat loss in a fluid . 8 1.2.3 Volume fraction in terms of molecular dimensions . 11 1.3 The relation for the diffusion coefficient . 11 1.3.1 Osmoticforce....................... 12 1.3.2 Frictional drag force — the Stokes law . 13 1.4 SuppMat: Basics of fluid mechanics . 15 1.4.1 The equation of continuity . 15 1.4.2 The Euler equation for an ideal fluid . 16 1.5 SuppMat: Calculating the effective viscosity . 18 1.5.1 The induced velocity field v′ ............... 18 1.5.2 The induced pressure field p′ .............. 20 1.5.3 Heat dissipation in a fluid with suspended particles . 20 1.6 SuppMat: The Stokes formula for viscous force . 24 2 The Brownian motion 27 2.1 Diffusion and Brownian motion . 29 2.1.1 Einstein’s statistical derivation of the diffusion equation 29 2.1.2 The solution of the diffusion equation and the mean- squaredisplacement . 32 2.2 Fluctuations of a particle system . 32 2.2.1 Randomwalk....................... 33 2.2.2 Brownian motion as a random walk . 34 2.3 The Einstein-Smoluchowski relation .
    [Show full text]
  • 1.4 Equipartition Theorem
    1.4 Equipartition Theorem Equipartition Theorem: If the dynamics of the system is described by the Hamiltonian: 2 H = Aζ + H0 where ζ is one of the general coordinates q1,p1, ,q3N ,p3N , and H0 and A are independent of ζ, then ··· 1 Aζ2 = k T 2 B βH where is the thermal average, i.e., the­ average® over the Gibbs measure e− . Thishi result can be easily seen by the following calculation: Aζ2e βHd3N qd3N p Aζ = − h i e βHd3N qd3N p R − 2 βAζ2 βH RAζ e− dζe− 0 [dpdq] = 2 e βAζ dζe βH0 [dpdq] R − − Aζ2e βAζ2 dζ = R − e βAζ2 dζ R − ∂ βAζ2 = R ln e− dζ −∂β Z ∂ 1 Ax2 x = ζ β = ln β− 2 e− dx −∂β ∙ Z ¸ ³ p ´ 1 = 2β 1 = k T 2 B where dζ [dpdq]=d3N qd3N p, i.e., [dpdq] stands for the phase-space volumn element without dζ. Note that if 2 2 H = Aipi + Biqi wheretherearetotalM terms in theseX sums andXAi and Bi are constant, independent of pi,qi , then { } 1 H = kBT M h i 2 µ ¶ 1 i.e., each quadratic component of the Hamiltonian shares 2 kBT of the total energy. For example, the Hamiltonian for interacting gas particles is p2 H = i + U (r r ) 2m i j i ij − X X 7 where U (ri rj) is the potential energy between any two particles. The equipartition theo- − 3 rem tells us that the average kinetic energy is 2 kBT for every particle (since there are three translational degrees of freedom for each particle).
    [Show full text]
  • Physics 451 - Statistical Mechanics II - Course Notes
    Physics 451 - Statistical Mechanics II - Course Notes David L. Feder January 8, 2013 Contents 1 Boltzmann Statistics (aka The Canonical Ensemble) 3 1.1 Example: Harmonic Oscillator (1D) . 3 1.2 Example: Harmonic Oscillator (3D) . 4 1.3 Example: The rotor . 5 1.4 The Equipartition Theorem (reprise) . 6 1.4.1 Density of States . 8 1.5 The Maxwell Speed Distribution . 10 1.5.1 Interlude on Averages . 12 1.5.2 Molecular Beams . 12 2 Virial Theorem and the Grand Canonical Ensemble 14 2.1 Virial Theorem . 14 2.1.1 Example: ideal gas . 15 2.1.2 Example: Average temperature of the sun . 15 2.2 Chemical Potential . 16 2.2.1 Free energies revisited . 17 2.2.2 Example: Pauli Paramagnet . 18 2.3 Grand Partition Function . 19 2.3.1 Examples . 20 2.4 Grand Potential . 21 3 Quantum Counting 22 3.1 Gibbs' Paradox . 22 3.2 Chemical Potential Again . 24 3.3 Arranging Indistinguishable Particles . 25 3.3.1 Bosons . 25 3.3.2 Fermions . 26 3.3.3 Anyons! . 28 3.4 Emergence of Classical Statistics . 29 4 Quantum Statistics 32 4.1 Bose and Fermi Distributions . 32 4.1.1 Fermions . 33 4.1.2 Bosons . 35 4.1.3 Entropy . 37 4.2 Quantum-Classical Transition . 39 4.3 Entropy and Equations of State . 40 1 PHYS 451 - Statistical Mechanics II - Course Notes 2 5 Fermions 43 5.1 3D Box at zero temperature . 43 5.2 3D Box at low temperature . 44 5.3 3D isotropic harmonic trap . 46 5.3.1 Density of States .
    [Show full text]
  • The Equipartition Theorem
    The Equipartition Theorem The equipartition theorem states that energy is shared equally amongst all energetically accessible degrees of freedom of a system. This is not a particularly surprising result, and can be thought of as another way of saying that a system will generally try to maximise its entropy (i.e. how ‘spread out’ the energy is in the system) by distributing the available energy evenly amongst all the accessible modes of motion. To give a rather contrived example, consider a container in which we have placed a number of ping-pong balls. Initially the balls are stationary. Imagine we now throw some energy randomly into our box, which will be shared out amongst the ping-pong balls in some way such that they begin to move about. While you might not realise it, intuitively you know what this motion will look like. For example, you would be very surprised if the particle motion looked like this: You would probably predict something more like this: i.e. completely random motion of the ping-pong balls. This is exactly the same result as predicted by the equipartition theorem – the energy is shared out evenly amongst the x, y, and z translational degrees of freedom. The equipartition theorem can go further than simply predicting that the available energy will be shared evenly amongst the accessible modes of motion, and can make quantitative predictions about how much energy will appear in each degree of freedom. Specifically, it states that each quadratic degree of freedom will, on average, possess an energy ½kT. A ‘quadratic degree of freedom’ is one for which the energy depends on the square of some property.
    [Show full text]