DOCSLIB.ORG

Transmission Line Route Segment Descriptions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transmission Line Route Segment Descriptions Entergy Texas, Inc. Proposed Castle 230 kV Transmission Line and Substation Project Grimes and Montgomery Counties, Texas Entergy Texas, Inc. (ETI) has filed an application with the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) to amend its Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) to construct the proposed Castle 230 kV Transmission Line and Substation Project. In its CCN application for this project, ETI presented 75 potential route segments, routing between six alternative cut-in options and two alternative substation sites for the PUCT to use in selecting a transmission line route for this project. ETI has presented 22 different alternative route combinations of the 75 segments for consideration by the PUCT. The following table lists the segment combinations that make up Entergy’s 22 alternative routes. All routes and route segments are available for selection and approval by the PUCT. Only one multi-segment transmission line route will ultimately be constructed. LENGTH ROUTE ROUTE COMPOSITION (MILES) Route 1 A-S1-S2-S4-AU-AV-BD-BC1-SUB A 6.68 Route 2 A-S1-S3-V1-V2-V5-AO-AU-AW-BA-BC1-SUB A 7.05 Route 3 B-R2-R1-U-V1-V2-V4-S4-AU-AW-BA-BC1-SUB A 6.76 Route 4 B-R2-R1-U-V1-V3-AL-AM-AO-AU-AW-BA-BC1-SUB A 6.56 Route 5 C1-BE-R1-U-V1-V3-AL-AM-AO-AU-AW-BA-BC1-SUB A 6.56 Route 6 C1-C2-T-U-V1-V3-AL-AN-AQ-AX-AY1-AY2-BA-BC1-SUB A 6.39 Route 7 C1-C2-P-W-AA-AD-AI-AL-AM-AO-AU-AW-BA-BC1-SUB A 6.23 Route 8 D-O-W-AB-AC-AD-AI-AL-AM-AP-AX-AY1-AY2-BA-BC1-SUB A 6.57 Route 9 E-N-O-W-AA-AD-AI-AL-AM-AP-AX-AZ1-AZ2-BC2-SUB A 7.03 Route 10 F1-F3-M2-Y-AC-AD-AI-AL-AM-AO-AU-AW-BA-BC1-SUB A 7.39 Route 11 B-R2-R1-U-V1-V2-V4-S4-AU-AW-AY2-BF-AZ2-BB-AS4-AS3-AR3-SUB C 7.43 Route 12 A-Q-R2-R1-U-V1-V3-AL-AN-AQ-AX-AZ1-BG-AS3-AR3-SUB C 7.38 Route 13 C1-C2-P-W-AA-AD-AJ1-AJ2-AR2-SUB C 6.50 Route 14 D-O-W-AA-AD-AJ1-AJ3-AS1-SUB C 6.86 Route 15 D-O-W-AB-AC-AD-AI-AL-AN-AR1-AR2-SUB C 6.96 Route 16 E-N-O-W-AA-AD-AI-AL-AM-AP-AX-AY1-BF-BG-AS3-AR3-SUB C 7.36 Route 17 E-M1-M2-X-Z-AE-AF1-AF2-AI-AL-AN-AQ-AX-AY1-BF-BG-AS3-AR3-SUB C 7.88 Route 18 F1-F3-M2-Y-AC-AD-AI-AL-AN-AR1-AR2-SUB C 7.82 Route 19 F1-F3-M2-X-Z-AE-AF1-AF3-AH2-AK-AS1-SUB C 8.07 Route 20 F1-F3-M2-X-Z-AE-AG-AH1-AH2-AK-AS1-SUB C 8.23 Route 21 C1-BE-R1-U-V1-V2-V5-AO-AU-AW-BA-BC1-SUB A 6.65 Route 22 C1-BE-R1-U-V1-V2-V5-AP-AX-AY1-AY2-BA-BC1-SUB A 6.69 The following narrative along with the enclosed map provides a general description of the segments that form the 22 Primary Alternative Routes in relation to area landmarks and readily identifiable points of reference such as administrative boundaries, streets, roads, highways, railroad tracks, etc. Some segments may be utilized in forward progressing routes as currently described, or in the opposite direction. All distances listed below are approximate and rounded to the nearest hundredth of a mile. The distances of individual segments below may not sum to the total length of route presented due to rounding. SEGMENT A: 0.70 Mile Segment A begins at its intersection with Entergy’s L-136 230 kV Transmission Line, Cut-In Option 1, located near the community of Dobbin in Montgomery County approximately 0.45-mile southwest of the intersection of Farm-to- Market (FM) Road 1486 and State Highway (SH) 105. The segment proceeds southwest for approximately 0.09-mile crossing a pipeline, CenterPoint’s 345 kV Transmission Line, and another pipeline. The segment then turns west for approximately 0.32-mile, then turns south for approximately 0.22-mile. The segment then turns west for approximately 0.07-mile, paralleling the north side of SH 105 and crossing Mount Mariah Road (Rd) before reaching the segment’s intersection with Segments S1 and Q, located approximately 0.08-mile northwest of the intersection of Mount Mariah Rd and SH 105. Castle 230 kV Transmission Line Description of the Alternative Routes SEGMENT B: 0.54 Mile Segment B begins at its intersection with Entergy’s L-136 230 kV Transmission Line, Cut-In Option 2, located near the community of Dobbin in Montgomery County approximately 0.53-mile southwest of the intersection of FM Road 1486 and SH 105. The segment heads west-southwest for approximately 0.09-mile, crossing a pipeline, CenterPoint’s 345 kV Transmission Line, and another pipeline, then turns southwest for approximately 0.24-mile, paralleling the south side of SH 105. The segment then turns southwest 0.09-mile crossing Mount Mariah Rd. The segment then turns northwest for approximately 0.12-mile, before reaching the segment’s intersection with Segments Q and R2, located approximately 0.08-mile southwest of the intersection of SH 105 and Mount Mariah Rd. SEGMENT C1: 0.28 Mile Segment C1 begins at its intersection with Entergy’s L-136 230 kV Transmission Line, Cut-In Option 3, located near the community of Dobbin in Montgomery County approximately 0.23-mile south-southwest of the intersection of Old Hwy 105 and Mount Mariah Rd. The segment heads southwest for approximately 0.22-mile crossing an existing pipeline, CenterPoint’s 345 kV Transmission Line, and Entergy’s L-96 138 kV Transmission Line. The segment then turns northwest for approximately 0.06-mile, crossing Bobville Rd and a railroad, before reaching the segment’s intersection with Segments BE and C2, located approximately 0.38-mile southwest from the intersection of Old Hwy 105 and Mount Mariah Rd. SEGMENT C2: 0.37 Mile Segment C2 begins at its intersection with Segments BE and C1, located approximately 0.38-mile southwest from the intersection of Old Hwy 105 and Mount Mariah Rd. The segment heads southwest for approximately 0.37-mile, paralleling the west side of a railroad, before reaching the segment’s intersection with Segments P and T, located approximately 0.75-mile southwest of the intersection of Old Hwy 105 and Mount Mariah Rd. SEGMENT D: 0.68 Mile Segment D begins at its intersection with Entergy’s L-136 230 kV Transmission Line, Cut-In Option 4, located near the community of Dobbin in Montgomery County approximately 0.35-mile southeast of the intersection of Old Hwy 105 and Mount Mariah Rd. The segment heads southwest for approximately 0.05-mile, crossing Entergy’s L-96 138 kV Transmission Line and an existing pipeline. The segment then turns southwest for approximately 0.08-mile, crossing an existing pipeline and CenterPoint’s 345 kV Transmission Line. The segment then turns south for approximately 0.55-mile, crossing Caney Creek, before reaching the segment’s intersection with Segments N and O, located approximately 0.96-mile south-southeast of the intersection of Old Hwy 105 and Mount Mariah Rd. SEGMENT E: 0.57 Mile Segment E begins at its intersection with Entergy’s L-136 230 kV Transmission Line, Cut-In Option 5, located near the community of Dobbin in Montgomery County approximately 0.67-mile southeast of the intersection of Old Hwy 105 and Mount Mariah Rd. The segment heads south for approximately 0.30-mile, crossing Entergy’s L-96 138 kV Transmission Line and paralleling the west side of FM 1486. The segment then turns southwest for approximately 0.05-mile, crossing two existing pipelines and CenterPoint’s 345 kV Transmission Line, then turns southeast for approximately 0.08-mile. The segment then turns south for approximately 0.14-mile, crossing Caney Creek, before reaching the segment’s intersection with Segments M1 and N, located approximately 0.10-mile west of the intersection of FM 1486 and Tisdel. SEGMENT F1: 0.35 Mile Segment F1 begins at its intersection with Entergy’s L-136 230 kV Transmission Line, Cut-In Option 6, located near the community of Dobbin in Montgomery County approximately 0.57-mile northeast of the intersection of FM 1486 and Tisdel. The segment heads southeast for approximately 0.35-mile, crossing Entergy’s L-96 138 kV Transmission Line and paralleling the west side of a railroad, before reaching the segment’s intersection with Segment F3, located approximately 0.53-mile northeast of the intersection of FM 1486 and Tisdel. SEGMENT F3: 0.65 Mile Segment F3 begins at its intersection with Segment F1, located approximately 0.53-mile northeast of the intersection of FM 1486 and Tisdel. The segment heads southwest for approximately 0.31-mile, crossing Caney Creek and three existing pipelines. The segment then turns south-southwest for approximately 0.05-mile, crossing an existing pipeline Castle 230 kV Transmission Line Description of the Alternative Routes and CenterPoint’s 345 kV Transmission Line. The segment then turns west for approximately 0.09-mile, crossing Tisdel.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Highways Infrastructure Transport—Footbridges/ Pedestrian Tunnels 6157TB Centre Street Escalator Link (Stage 1)
    CAPITAL WORKS RESERVE FUND (Payments) Sub- Approved Actual Revised head project expenditure estimate Estimate (Code) Approved projects estimate to 31.3.2018 2018–19 2019–20 ————— ————— ————— ————— $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 Head 706—Highways Infrastructure Transport—Footbridges/ pedestrian tunnels 6157TB Centre Street escalator link (stage 1) ............ 60,700 53,409 910 482 6158TB Elevated walkway between Tong Ming Street and Tong Tak Street, Tseung Kwan O ....................................... 221,600 24,686 27,400 30,000 6162TB Extension of footbridge network in Tsuen Wan—Footbridge A along Tai Ho Road............................................. 183,850 165,063 854 524 6164TB Footbridge connecting Tsuen Wan Plaza, Skyline Plaza and adjacent landscaping area ...................................... 146,200 11,993 19,860 26,100 6167TB Provision of barrier-free access facilities at public footbridges, elevated walkways and subways— design works and phase 1 construction works ................................... 292,100 230,887 6,635 2,807 6168TB Lift and pedestrian walkway system at Waterloo Hill ....................................... 116,700 25,664 14,191 22,133 6169TB Lift and pedestrian walkway system at Cheung Hang Estate, Tsing Yi ............. 222,700 34,121 30,141 20,237 6173TB Extension of the CITIC Tower Footbridge to the Legislative Council Complex at Tamar ...................... 74,300 49,323 100 12,177 6175TB Lift and pedestrian walkway system between Kwai Shing Circuit and Hing Shing Road, Kwai Chung ............... 239,400 22,393 24,000 45,152 6178TB Lift and pedestrian walkway system between Castle Peak Road and Kung Yip Street, Kwai Chung ................. 584,400 — 200 84,017 6182TB Elevated pedestrian corridor in Yuen Long Town connecting with Long Ping Station .................................... Cat. B — — 88,830 † 6185TB Lift and pedestrian walkway system between Tai Wo Hau Road and Wo Tong Tsui Street, Kwai Chung ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • CAPITAL WORKS RESERVE FUND (Payments)
    CAPITAL WORKS RESERVE FUND (Payments) Sub- Approved Actual Revised head project expenditure estimate Estimate (Code) Approved projects estimate to 31.3.2017 2017–18 2018–19 ————— ————— ————— ————— $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 Head 706—Highways Infrastructure Transport—Footbridges/ pedestrian tunnels 6153TB Enhancement of footbridges in Tsim Sha Tsui East .................................. 71,400 55,384 120 210 6157TB Centre Street escalator link (stage 1) ............ 60,700 53,367 100 810 6158TB Elevated walkway between Tong Ming Street and Tong Tak Street, Tseung Kwan O ....................................... 221,600 5,543 18,980 34,271 6164TB Footbridge connecting Tsuen Wan Plaza, Skyline Plaza and adjacent landscaping area ...................................... 146,200 — 15,000 42,197 6167TB Provision of barrier-free access facilities at public footbridges, elevated walkways and subways— design works and phase 1 construction works ................................... 292,100 220,765 12,230 6,635 6168TB Lift and pedestrian walkway system at Waterloo Hill ....................................... 116,700 5,135 21,000 32,536 6169TB Lift and pedestrian walkway system at Cheung Hang Estate, Tsing Yi ............. 222,700 2,891 35,000 50,720 6173TB Extension of the CITIC Tower Footbridge to the Legislative Council Complex at Tamar ...................... 74,300 47,818 2,000 2,000 6175TB Lift and pedestrian walkway system between Kwai Shing Circuit and Hing Shing Road, Kwai Chung ............... 239,400 — 21,900 36,000 6178TB Lift and pedestrian walkway system between Castle Peak Road and Kung Yip Street, Kwai Chung ................. Cat. B — — 10,828 † 6182TB Elevated pedestrian corridor in Yuen Long Town connecting with Long Ping Station .................................... Cat. B — — 93,568 † 6185TB Lift and pedestrian walkway system between Tai Wo Hau Road and Wo Tong Tsui Street, Kwai Chung ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • CAPITAL WORKS RESERVE FUND (Payments)
    CAPITAL WORKS RESERVE FUND (Payments) Sub- Approved Actual Revised head project expenditure estimate Estimate (Code) Approved projects estimate to 31.3.2001 2001–02 2002–03 ————— ————— ————— ————— $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 Head 706—Highways Infrastructure Transport—Footbridges/pedestrian tunnels 6079TB Hillside escalator link between Central and Mid-levels .................................... 253,300 251,755 50 10 6117TB Footbridge at junction of Boundary Street and Embankment Road............. 27,000 23,922 1,400 997 6121TB Duplication of Pedder Street Footbridge . 65,000 8,015 22,420 14,959 6124TB Pedestrian subway at junction of Kowloon Park Drive and Salisbury Road.................................................... 44,000 17,614 7,034 1,621 6125TB Pedestrian subway at the junction of Kowloon Park Drive and Peking Road.................................................... 48,300 16,828 5,872 567 6126TB Pedestrian subway at junction of Austin Road/Canton Road .............................. 90,200 42,648 8,795 8,084 6129TB Footbridge and road widening at the junction of Hung Mui Kok Road and Tin Sam Street, Sha Tin ...................... 33,000 — — 5,985 6150TB Reconstruction of two footbridges across Choi Hung Road near Shatin Pass Road and Tai Shing Street .......... Cat. B — — 997† ————— ————— ————— ————— Sub-total ......................................... 560,800 360,782 45,571 33,220 ————— ————— ————— ————— Transport—Traffic control 6009TC Kowloon area traffic control system, renewal and enhancement—main works..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Head 706 — HIGHWAYS (Expressed in Hong Kong Dollars)
    Capital Works Reserve Fund STATEMENT OF PROJECT PAYMENTS FOR 2017-18 Head 706 — HIGHWAYS (Expressed in Hong Kong dollars) Subhead Approved Original Project Estimate Estimate Actual up to Amended 31.3.2018 Estimate Actual $’000 $’000 $’000 Infrastructure Transport－Footbridges/pedestrian tunnels 6153TB Enhancement of footbridges in Tsim Sha Tsui East 71,400 370 55,387 370 3 6157TB Centre Street escalator link (stage 1) 60,700 - 53,409 50 42 6158TB Elevated walkway between Tong Ming Street and 221,600 30,000 Tong Tak Street, Tseung Kwan O 24,686 30,000 19,143 6164TB Footbridge connecting Tsuen Wan Plaza, Skyline 146,200 42,620 Plaza and adjacent landscaping area 11,993 42,620 11,993 6167TB Provision of barrier-free access facilities at public 292,100 13,695 footbridges, elevated walkways and subways－ 230,887 13,695 10,122 design works and phase 1 construction works 6168TB Lift and pedestrian walkway system at Waterloo Hill 116,700 29,822 25,664 29,822 20,529 6169TB Lift and pedestrian walkway system at Cheung Hang 222,700 79,313 Estate, Tsing Yi 34,121 79,313 31,230 6173TB Extension of the CITIC Tower Footbridge to the 74,300 9,050 Legislative Council Complex at Tamar 49,323 9,050 1,505 6175TB Lift and pedestrian walkway system between Kwai 239,400 27,965 Shing Circuit and Hing Shing Road, Kwai Chung 22,393 27,965 22,393 6185TB Lift and pedestrian walkway system between Tai Wo 249,400 518 Hau Road and Wo Tong Tsui Street, Kwai Chung - 518 - Transport－Interchanges/bus termini 6045TI Transport terminus in Area 35, Tsuen Wan 20,900 20,900 -
    [Show full text]
  • CAPITAL WORKS RESERVE FUND (Payments)
    CAPITAL WORKS RESERVE FUND (Payments) Sub- Approved Actual Revised head project expenditure estimate Estimate (Code) Approved projects estimate to 31.3.2003 2003–04 2004–05 ————— ————— ————— ————— $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 Head 706—Highways Infrastructure Transport—Footbridges/pedestrian tunnels 6121TB Duplication of Pedder Street Footbridge............................................ 65,000 36,030 13,241 1,371 6124TB Pedestrian subway at the junction of Kowloon Park Drive and Salisbury Road..................................................... 44,000 27,178 445 1,336 6125TB Pedestrian subway at the junction of Kowloon Park Drive and Peking Road..................................................... 48,300 25,685 945 360 6129TB Footbridge and road widening at the junction of Hung Mui Kok Road and Tin Sam Street, Sha Tin ....................... 33,000 4,495 17,000 11,500 6150TB Reconstruction of two footbridges across Choi Hung Road near Shatin Pass Road and Tai Shing Street ........... Cat. B — — 7,858† 6152TB Footbridge across Po Kong Village Road at the junction with Tsz Wan Shan Road ............................................ Cat. B — — 5,697† ————— ————— ————— ————— Sub-total .......................................... 190,300 93,388 31,631 28,122 ————— ————— ————— ————— Transport—Traffic control 6017TC Area traffic control and closed circuit television system for Tai Po and North District ....................................... 97,200 4,972 26,000 23,000 6018TC Renewal of Hong Kong area traffic control and closed circuit television systems................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Airac Amendment 13/18 Effective Date 06 Dec 18
    MilAIP NETHERLANDS Koninklijke Luchtmacht Breda, 10 Oct 2018 Staf CLSK DO/AMO/SAOC Postbus 8762 4820 BB BREDA MPC 92 A BREDA AIRAC AMENDMENT 13/18 EFFECTIVE DATE 06 DEC 18 to the Military Aeronautical Information Publication (vs 83-6100-004; pub. Nr. 010701) 1. The following changes to the MilAIP Netherlands have to be incorporated: a. Handamendment: None. b. Page changes: Remove old Insert new Remove old Insert new Remove old Insert new GEN 0.4-1 GEN 0.4-1 ENR 0.6-1 ENR 0.6-1 EHGR 2 - 1 EHGR 2 - 1 up to up to up to up to EHGR 2 - 6 EHGR 2 - 6 GEN 0.4-4 GEN 0.4-4 ENR 0.6-6 ENR 0.6-6 GEN 0.6-1 GEN 0.6-1 ENR 1.11-1 ENR 1.11-1 up to up to GEN 0.6-6 GEN 0.6-4 ENR 5.2-14 ENR 5.2-14 GEN 3.1-3 GEN 3.1-3 2. After completion: a. destroy obsolete pages; b. insert letter of promulgation before page GEN 0; c. record the incorporration of this amendment on page GEN 0.2-1. 3. The following MIL NOTAM are incorporated: None Military Aviation Authority NLD In order H-ALL L.C.J. Cremers Lt Colonel Military Air Traffic Control, The Netherlands MilAIP NETHERLANDS GEN 0.4 - 1 GEN 0.4 CHECKLIST OF MilAIP PAGES PAGE DATE PAGE DATE PAGE DATE PART 1 - GENERAL (GEN) GEN 1 2.2-6 12 NOV 2015 2.3-1 18 AUG 2016 GEN 0 1.1-1 12 NOV 2015 2.3-2 12 NOV 2015 1.1-2 12 NOV 2015 2.4-1 07 DEC 2017 0.1-1 12 NOV 2015 1.3-1 12 NOV 2015 2.4-2 12 NOV 2015 0.1-2 12 NOV 2015 1.3-2 12 NOV 2015 2.5-1 12 NOV 2015 0.1-3 07 DEC 2017 1.6-1 12 NOV 2015 2.5-2 12 NOV 2015 0.1-4 12 NOV 2015 1.6-2 12 NOV 2015 2.6-1 12 NOV 2015 0.2-1 12 NOV 2015 1.6-3 27 APR 2017 2.6-2 12 NOV 2015 0.2-2 12 NOV
    [Show full text]
  • Speed Limit in Hong Kong
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL PANEL ON TRANSPORT Speed Limit in Hong Kong PURPOSE This paper presents - (a) the structure of speed limit categorisation and the criteria of setting speed limits on roads in Hong Kong; (b) the review of speed limits in Hong Kong; and (c) the relationship between traffic accidents and speed limit. BACKGROUND 2. On 17 December 1999, the Administration presented to the LegCo Panel on Transport a proposal to increase the fixed penalty and Driving-Offence Points for serious speeding offences as measures to combat speeding. At the meeting, Members expressed reservations over the appropriateness of the structure of our existing speed limit categorisation and asked the Administration to provide further information on the subject. SPEED LIMIT STRUCTURE IN HONG KONG Speed limit categorisation 3. In Hong Kong, speed limits are imposed primarily to promote road safety. At present, our speed limit structure comprises the following 3 main categories:- Low band - 50 km/h for urban or new town built-up areas Middle band - 70/80 km/h for areas outside urban or new town built-up areas High band - 100 km/h for high standard expressways, North Lantau Highway being the one exception (110/km/h) - 2 - 4. In general, 50 km/h is the standard speed limit on roads in the built-up areas, whether they are in Hong Kong, Kowloon or the New Territories. For areas outside the built–up areas in Hong Kong and Kowloon, the speed limit is 70 km/h. For areas outside the built-up areas in the New Territories, the speed limit is 70/80 km/h.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional and Hong Kong's Transport Network Planning Framework
    This subject paper is intended to be a research paper on the results of studies or surveys from government land private sectors that are pertinent to the subject on Regional and Hong Kong's Transport Network Planning Framework. The views and analyses as contained in this paper are intended to stimulate public discussion and input to the planning process of the "HK2030 Study" and do not imply endorsement of the HKSARG. WORKING PAPER NO. 21 REGIONAL AND HONG KONG'S TRANSPORT NETWORK PLANNING FRAMEWORK Introduction 1. Railways and expressways are the main arteries of cities. They are the backbones to facilitate movements of goods and people. The prosperity and growth of a city depend very much on the efficient operation and development of its circulation systems. 2. This paper gives an overview of the existing and future strategic transport network in particular road and railway infrastructure in the Guangdong Province of the Mainland China 1. It also examines the present and future development of our Hong Kong's transport network in order to set the basic framework for planning an integrated transport system in the next stage of the study. Regional Transport Network I. Guangdong Province A. Road Infrastructure Exisitng Road Infrastrucutre 3. To accelerate the modernisation of transportation in China, in the early 1990s, the Ministry of Transportation put forward a strategic and ambitious distribution plan for the national trunk road system. Highways in China can be classified into 6 technical categories. They are expressway, Class I to IV Highways and others. According to the Guangdong Statistical Bureau (Table 1), there were a total of about 95,610km of roads covering the Guangdong Province in 1999, of which 953 km (1%) were expressway and 17,199km (18%) were Classes I and II highways.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council
    立法會 Legislative Council LC Paper No. CB(1)133/11-12 Ref: CB1/PL/TP Panel on Transport Special meeting on 26 October 2011 Updated background brief on Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Purpose This paper provides background information on the Hong Kong- Zhuhai-Macao Bridge (HZMB) and summarizes the major concerns expressed by Legislative Council (LegCo) Members about the HZMB project in past discussions. Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge 2. The HZMB Main Bridge will be a 29.6 km dual three-lane carriageway in the form of a bridge-cum-tunnel structure comprising an immersed tunnel of about 6.7 km. It will run within Mainland waters from the artificial islands off Gongbei of Zhuhai and A Pérola of the Macao Special Administrative Region (Macao SAR) to the eastern artificial island west of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) boundary. The HZMB is among the 10 major infrastructure projects highlighted in the 2007-2008 Policy Address. Background 3. In January 2003, the National Development and Reform Commission and the HKSAR Government jointly commissioned the Institute of Comprehensive Transportation to conduct a study entitled "Transport Linkage between Hong Kong and Pearl River West". The study confirmed the strategic significance of and urgent need for the construction of a land transport link between HKSAR and the Pearl River West. - 2 - 4. The governments of Guangdong, HKSAR and Macao SAR have since 2003 formed an HZMB Advance Work Coordination Group (AWCG) to commence the preparatory work of HZMB. The HKSAR Government also engaged consultants to carry out investigation and preliminary design (I&PD) of HZMB Hong Kong Section and North Lantau Highway Connection for linkage to the local road network.
    [Show full text]
  • CB(1)1348/07-08 Ref: CB1/PL/TP
    立法會 Legislative Council LC Paper No. CB(1)1348/07-08 Ref: CB1/PL/TP Panel on Transport Background Brief on Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Purpose 1. This paper sets out the background to the planning of Hong Kong - Zhuhai - Macao Bridge (HZMB), and summarizes Members' concerns about the project. Hong Kong – Zhuhai – Macao Bridge 2. In January 2003, the National Development and Reform Commission and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government jointly commissioned the Institution of Comprehensive Transportation to conduct a study, namely, "Transport Linkage between Hong Kong and Pearl River West". The study, completed in July 2003, concluded that the construction of a land transport link between HKSAR and the Pearl River West would contribute to the development of tourism, logistics, finance and trade in HKSAR, reinforce its status as an international shipping and aviation centre, and promote the economic integration between HKSAR and the Pearl River West. The study also confirmed the need for and urgency of such a link and recommended the construction of HZMB and early commencement of various studies, including environmental impact assessment and hydrology study, to confirm its technical feasibility. 3. On 4 August 2003, the State Council gave approval for the governments of HKSAR, Guangdong Province and the Macao Special Administrative Region (Macao SAR) to proceed with the preparatory work for HZMB. A HZMB Advance Work Coordination Group (AWCG) was then established by the three governments to coordinate and take forward the advance work for HZMB. 4. In parallel, the HKSAR Government had also engaged consultants to carry out investigation and preliminary design of HZMB and North Lantau - 2 - Highway Connection (NLHC) for connection to the local road network.
    [Show full text]
  • SPPO NO. 1618-0060 Series of 2016 WHEREAS, Republic Act 7160
    Republic of the Philippines SANGGUNIANG PANLUNGSOD General Santos City General Santos City General Santos City SPPO NO. 1618-0060 Series of 2016 WHEREAS, Republic Act 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government Code of 1991, accords every local government unit the power and authority to promote the general welfare within its territorial jurisdiction, including the promotion of health and safety of its people; WHEREAS, the transport and traffic management in the city of General Santos shall be addressed judiciously through a rationalized mechanism in terms of urban planning, enforcement of ordinances, as well as allocation of resources to carry-out pro-people and environment-friendly plans and strategies; WHEREAS, the traffic problems and issues must be resolved in a rational manner, such as the passage of a comprehensive ordinance on land transportation and traffic management guided by facts and formulated through consultations, collaboration, and coordination with the national agencies; WHEREAS, the city shall take to heart the country’s commitment to the international community with respect to protecting the environment and bearing in mind the adverse effects of climate change, as by promoting e- tricycles and e-jeepneys as well as the use of bicycles and the provision by the city of bicycle lanes in order to minimize, if not eradicate the release of carbon footprints into the atmosphere. NOW THEREFORE, on motion of City Councilor Dominador S. Lagare Jr., duly seconded by City Councilors Jose Edmar Yumang, Elizabeth B. Bagonoc, Vandyke Congson, Rosalita T. Nunez, Franklin M. Gacal Jr., be it - RESOLVED, as it is hereby resolved, to enact the following Ordinance: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Informainformation Note Tion Note
    TheThe NewNew RouteRoute 1010 SouthernSouthern SectionSection HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT The benefits of the revised scheme are: HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT z Siu Lam Link Road, which attracted most of the objections to the gazetted scheme, z has been deleted and replaced with a link road between Siu Lam and Ting Kau (Sham MAJOR WORKS PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE Tseng Tunnel Link Road) with connections to Tuen Mun Road and Ting Kau Bridge. z z The proposed Sham Tseng Tunnel Link Road together with the So Kwun Wat Link Road provides additional dual 2-lane capacity to Tuen Mun Road corridor between So Kwun Wat and Ting Kau. It would remove the need for widening of Tuen Mun Road, which will inevitably pose disruption and danger to traffic. It is a cost-effective alter- native providing needed additional capacity to this important corridor with minimum disruption to traffic during construction; z z It provides for a future connection from Lam Tei to Ting Kau via the proposed Sham Tseng Tunnel Link Road upon the completion of the Northern Section of Route 10- SOUTHERN SECTION TION NOTE TION NOTE NLYLH. This alternative also has a secondary, but very major benefit in that it will TION NOTE TION NOTE TION NOTE z divert significant volumes of traffic from Tuen Mun Town during peak hours; z The connections to Tsing Lung Bridge from Tuen Mun Road at Tsing Lung Tau REVISED SCHEME provide convenient access to Lantau and the Airport for the residents of Sham Tseng, z Tsuen Wan, Tai Lam, Siu Lam and Gold Coast; z The direct connection from Tsing Lung Bridge to North Lantau Highway provides the linkage to Lantau.
    [Show full text]