DOCSLIB.ORG

A Check List of the Aphi Ds of Tasmania and Their Recorded Host Plants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Check List of the Aphi Ds of Tasmania and Their Recorded Host Plants CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Tasmania Open Access Repository PAPERS ANI) PROCF,EDINGS OF THS ROYAL SOClmy 0>' TASMANIA, VOLUliUil 97 A CHECK LIST OF THE APHI DS OF TASMANIA AND THEIR RECORDED HOST PLANTS By E .•1. MARTYN and L. W. MILLER Entomology Division, Department 'OJ Agriculture, Hobart ABSTRACT identity have been omitted. The only exception In this first check list of the aphids occurring in is for some of the aphid trap records where the Tasmania, 69 species are recorded. Of these 4:ol la.rge bulk of common species has not been retained. have been recorded from bO'th host plants and The information is complete to December 31st, 1961. aphid traps, 12 on host plants only and 15 solely Later records have been included only in exceptional from traps. The host plant list comprises 148 instances. species from 46 botanical famiUes. LIST OF APHID SPECIES INTRODUCTION L Acyrthosiphon pelargonii (Kalt.) s.str. Although various species of aphids have been recorded from time to time by previous Government Host: Erodium 'moschatum (L.) Ait. Entomologists (Thompson, 1892 and 1895; Lea, 1908; Localities: Grove, New Town, Triabunna. Evans, 1943) no check list of the aphids occurring Collection Dates: Oct., Nov. in Tasmania has ever been published. When one of Trap Records: April, June, July, Sept.-Dec. us (L,W.M.) initiated a study of the aphid fauna of Tasmania in 1944 there was virtually a complete 2. Acyrthosiphon pisum (Ha.rris) ssp, spartii lack of specimens, identified or not, in the col­ (Koch). lection of the Tasmanian Department of Agricul­ Hosts: Cytisus 'monspessulanus L, Lathyrus ture. This was unfortunate as it prevented a sp. direct check from being made on the validity of Localities: Dynnyrne, Grove, New Town, previous records, some of which on the basis of our Sandy Bay, Taroona. present knowledge were certainly erroneous. CoUection Dates: June, ,July, Nov., Dec. Trap Records: Oct.-Jan., May. Collections from 1944 onwards have greatly in­ creased the number of species known to occur in 3. Acyrthosiphon primulae (Thea.). Tasmania from the 18 species recorded by Evans Host: Primula sp. (1943) to the 69 species now recognized. By 1957 Localities: New Town, Taroona. the stage had been reached where the publication Collection Dates: April, July, Oct. of a check list was considered desirable and one Trap Records: --. of us <E.J.M.J has been engaged since that time in checking the slide and spirit collections and 4. Aphis acaenovinae Eastop. revising the earlier identificattons in the light of Host: --. current usage. An aphid trapping programme Localities: Grove, New Town. initiated in 1960 has also resulted in the discovery Collection Dates: --. of some further species. Trap Recol'ds: Oct., Dec. This check list is arranged in three sections. The 5. Aphis craccivora Koch. first section is an alphabetical list of aphid species and contains the records of hosts, localities and Hosts: Clianthus pun ice us B. & S., Lotus sp., collection dates; the second is an alphabetical list Phaseolus multittorus Willd., Phaseo/us of host plants and the aphids recorded on them; vulgaris L., Trifolium rep ens L., TrifoliuTn and the third is an alphabetical list of botanical subterraneuTn L., Vicia faba L., Vicia jaba families and the genera in these families that have L., var. minor Beck., Vicia sativa L. been recorded as aphid hosts in Tasmania. Localities: Cressy, Grove, Hobart, Kingston, Latrobe, New Town, Sandy Bay, Sorell, The check list is based on specimens retained in Stra,thblane, Taroona. the permanent collection of the Department of Collection Dates: Feb., March, June, July, Agriculture and host records for which aphid Sept., Nov., Dec. specimens are not available for confirmation of Trap Records: Aug., Oct.-ApriL 53 54 CHECK LIST OF APHIDS OF TASMANIA AND THEIR RECORDED HOSTS 6. Aphis gossypi~ Glover . I', iscus sp., Senecio.cruentus DC., Senecio sp., , 'E:osts: Aster' ·sP.: 'Bo'Jvdi-dia"sp., ddssia sP.,;; ; 'Tfi/olium 'prdtertse L.;'Veronica sp., Vicia Cucumis sativus L., Cucf,t/i;Bitfk l rlmo; 1:..,)' I Cyphomandra betacea Sendt.; Lachenalia . I t.o~t~ftf!2:: dessy, Grove, Hobart, Launces­ tricolor Thunb., Photinia sp., Sedum sp. ton, Lenah ValLey, Longley, Lutana, Mar­ Localities: Burnie, Grove, Hobart, Launces­ gate, Mt. Stuart, Mt. Wellington (c. 1000 ton, New Town, Sandy Bay, Taroona. ft.), New Town, Pittwater, Rosny Pt., Collection D3Jtes: Jan.-March, June, July, Sandy Bay, Summerleas, Taroona, Tewkes­ Sept.-Nov. bury. Trap Records: Sept.-May. Collection Dates: March, April, June, Aug.­ Jan. 7. Aphis nerii B.d.F. Trap Records: April-Jan. Host: Asclepias fruticosa L. Loc,alities: Hobart, New Town. 14. Brachycaudus persicaecola (Boisd'). Collection Dates: March. Hosts: Prunus persica Sieb. & Zucc., Prunus Trap Records: Oct., DeC.-April. salicina Lindl. Localities: Dynnyrne, Hobart, New Town, 8. Aphis spiraecola Patch. Somerset. Hosts: Aster sp., Chaenomeles ;aponica Collection Dates: Sept., Oct. Lindl., Cotoneaster sp., Hydrangea sp., .Trap Records: Oct.-Dec. pyrus communis L., pyrus malus L., Spiraea sp., Viburnum opuZus L. var. sterile DC. 15. Brevicoryne brassicae (L.). Localities: Devonport, Grove, Hobart, Mar­ Hosts: Brassica chinensis L., Brassica oler­ gate, New Town, Premaydena, Ranelagh, ace a L., Brassica oleracea .L. var. ramosa Sandy Bay. Alef., Cardaria draba (LJ Desv. Collection Dates: Jan.-March, May, July, Localities: Grove, Hobart, New Town, Rich­ Nov. mond, Summerleas. Trap Records: Sept.-June. Collection Dates: March, April, July, Sept., 9. Aphis sp. oct. Trap Records: Aug.-June. Host: --. Locality: Grove. 16: Capitophorus elaeagni (del Guercio). Collection Dates: --. Trap Records: Jan. Hosts: Carduus pycnocephalus L., Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., Cirsium vulgare (Savi) 10. Aploneura lentisci (Pass.). Ten., Cryptostemma calendula (LJ Druce. Hosts: Bromus mollis L. (roots), Lolium Localities: Bridgewater, Cambridge, Cressy, perenne L. (roots) , Ribes nigrum L. Douglas River, Freshwater Point, Grove, (roots) . Launceston, New Town. Loc'alities: Grove, Hayes, M'argate, New Town, Collection Dates: May-July. Ouse. Trap Records: oct.-June. Collection Dates: March, June, Oc,t., Dec. Trap records: Nov.-March. 17. Cavariella aegopodii (Scop.). Hosts: Apium graveolens L., Daucus carota 1l. Aulacorthum solani (Kalt.). L., Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Pastinaca Hosts: Campanula medium L., Lathyrus sp., sativa L., Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Physostegia sp., Senecio sp., Solanum tuber­ Nym., Salix sp. osum L. LocaUties: Cressy, Glenorchy, Grove, Hobart, Localities: Dynnyrne, Grove, Hobart, New Howrah, Launceston, New Norfolk, New Town, Pittwater, Tewkesbury. Town, Summerleas, Taroona. Collection Dates: Jan., July, Oct., Dec. Collection Dates: March-June, Oct.-Jan. Trap Records: Sept.-June. Trap Records: Jan.-Dec. 12. Aulacorthum (Neomyzus) circumfiexum (Buck­ 18. Chaetosiphon (Pentatrichopus) fragaejolii ton). (ckll.) . Hosts: Adiantum sp., Cymbidium sp., Oxalis Host: Fragaria sp. cult. corniculata L., Vicia sp. Localities: Blessington, Hobart, New Town, Localities: Sandy Bay, Taroona. Snug. Collection Dates: May, July, Aug., Oct. Collection Dates: Jan., March, Aug., Nov. Trap Records: -. Trap Records: June, Nov. 13. Brachycaudus helichrypi (Kalt.). Hosts: Aster sp., Bedfordia salicina DC., 19. Chaetosiphon (Pentatrichopus) tetrarhodum Carduus pycnocephalus L., centaurea (Walker) . cyanus L.; Chamaecytisus proliferus (L.f.) Hosts: Rosa. rubig~nosaL., Rosa sp.cult. Link., Chrysanthemum sp., Cotula coron­ Looalities: Grove, Hobart, Lenah Valley, New opifolia L., Cytisus sp" Dahlia sp., Daisy ,Town, Summerleas, Ulverstone. (Compositae), Erechthites quadridentata Collection Dates: April, Sept., Nov. (Labill.) DC., Helianthus annuus L., Hib.,. Trap Records: May, Oct.-Dec. E. J. MARTYN AND L. W. MILLER 55 20. Cinara (Cupressobium) cupressi <Buckton). 31. Eriosorna lanuginosurn (Hartig). Host: Cupressus macrocarpa Gord. Hosts: pyrus comrnunis L.(roots), Ulrnus Localtties: . Claremont, Hobart, New Town, cq,mpestris L. Sandy Bay. Localities: Cambridge, Castle Forbes Bay, Collection Dates: April, June, Aug., Sept. Claremont, Grove, New Town, Ranelagh. Trap Records: Oct. Collection Dates: Sept., Dec.-April. Trap. Records: Dec.-April. 21. Cinara (Cupressobium) tujafilina (del Guer,) species group. 32. Euceraphis punctipennis (Zett.l. Host: Callitris tasmanica <Benth.l B. & S. Host: Betula alba L. Locality: Coles Bay. Looalities: New Town, Taroona. Collection Date: May. Collection Datos: April, Sept. Trap Records: --. Trap Records: Sept.-July. 22. Cinara sp. 33. Hyadaphis joeniculi (Pass.). Host:Picea sp. Hosts: Daucus carota. L., Lonicera sp., Pet­ Locality: Oatlands. roselinurn crispum (Mill.) Nym. Collection Date: May (Specimens immature). Localities: Glenorchy, Hobart, New Town, Trap Records: --. Summerleas, Taroona. 23. Coloradoa rujomaculata (Wilson). Collection Dates: April, Oct.-Dec. Trap Records: Feb.-April, Oct. Host: Chrysanthemum sp. Locality: Hobart. 34. Hyalopterus arundinis (FJ. Collection Date: April. 'rrap Records: --. Host: --. Localities: Grove, New Town. 24. Drepanosiphum platanoides (Bchr!. Collection Dates: --. Trap Records: March-May, Dec. Host: Acer pseudoplatanus L. Localities: Hobart, New Town. 35. Hyperomyzus Zactucae (L.l. Collection Dates. April. Trap Records: Feb.-June, Oct.-Dee. Hosts: Ribes nigrum L., Ribes sp., Sonchu8 oleraceus L. 25. Dysaphis apii!olia (Theo.). Localities: Grove, Hobart, New Town, Rane­ Host: ---. lagh, Bandy Bay, Summerleas,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sequence Analysis of the Potato Aphid Macrosiphum Euphorbiae Transcriptome Identified Two New Viruses Marcella A
    Chapman University Chapman University Digital Commons Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Sciences Science and Technology Faculty Articles and Faculty Articles and Research Research 3-29-2018 Sequence Analysis of the Potato Aphid Macrosiphum euphorbiae Transcriptome Identified Two New Viruses Marcella A. Texeira University of California, Riverside Noa Sela Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel Hagop S. Atamian Chapman University, [email protected] Ergude Bao University of California, Riverside Rita Chaudhury University of California, Riverside See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/sees_articles Part of the Agricultural Science Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Biosecurity Commons, Entomology Commons, Parasitology Commons, and the Virus Diseases Commons Recommended Citation Teixeira MA, Sela N, Atamian HS, Bao E, Chaudhary R, MacWilliams J, et al. (2018) Sequence analysis of the potato aphid Macrosiphum euphorbiae transcriptome identified two new viruses. PLoS ONE 13(3): e0193239. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0193239 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Science and Technology Faculty Articles and Research at Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Sciences Faculty Articles and Research by an authorized administrator of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sequence Analysis of the Potato Aphid Macrosiphum
    [Show full text]
  • A Check List of the Aphi Ds of Tasmania and Their Recorded Host Plants
    PAPERS ANI) PROCF,EDINGS OF THS ROYAL SOClmy 0>' TASMANIA, VOLUliUil 97 A CHECK LIST OF THE APHI DS OF TASMANIA AND THEIR RECORDED HOST PLANTS By E .•1. MARTYN and L. W. MILLER Entomology Division, Department 'OJ Agriculture, Hobart ABSTRACT identity have been omitted. The only exception In this first check list of the aphids occurring in is for some of the aphid trap records where the Tasmania, 69 species are recorded. Of these 4:ol la.rge bulk of common species has not been retained. have been recorded from bO'th host plants and The information is complete to December 31st, 1961. aphid traps, 12 on host plants only and 15 solely Later records have been included only in exceptional from traps. The host plant list comprises 148 instances. species from 46 botanical famiUes. LIST OF APHID SPECIES INTRODUCTION L Acyrthosiphon pelargonii (Kalt.) s.str. Although various species of aphids have been recorded from time to time by previous Government Host: Erodium 'moschatum (L.) Ait. Entomologists (Thompson, 1892 and 1895; Lea, 1908; Localities: Grove, New Town, Triabunna. Evans, 1943) no check list of the aphids occurring Collection Dates: Oct., Nov. in Tasmania has ever been published. When one of Trap Records: April, June, July, Sept.-Dec. us (L,W.M.) initiated a study of the aphid fauna of Tasmania in 1944 there was virtually a complete 2. Acyrthosiphon pisum (Ha.rris) ssp, spartii lack of specimens, identified or not, in the col­ (Koch). lection of the Tasmanian Department of Agricul­ Hosts: Cytisus 'monspessulanus L, Lathyrus ture. This was unfortunate as it prevented a sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Narcissus Narcissus Crop Walkers’ Guide
    Crop Walkers’ Guide Narcissus Narcissus Crop Walkers’ Guide Introduction Narcissus growers can encounter a range of problems that can impact on both the quality and yield of flowers and bulbs unless they are identified and dealt with. Often, such problems are linked to pests and diseases, but a range of physiological and cultural disorders may also be encountered. This AHDB Horticulture Crop Walkers’ Guide has been created to assist growers and agronomists in the vital task of monitoring crops in the fields and bulbs post-lifting. It is designed for use directly in the field to help with the accurate identification of pests, diseases and disorders of narcissus. Images of the key stages of each pest or pathogen, along with typical plant symptoms produced have been included, together with succinct bullet point comments to assist with identification. As it is impossible to show all symptoms of every pest, disease or disorder, growers are advised to familiarise themselves with the range of symptoms that can be expressed and be aware of new problems that may occasionally arise. For other bulb and cut flower crops, see the AHDB Horticulture Cut Flower Crop Walkers’ Guide. This guide does not attempt to offer advice on available control measures as these frequently change. Instead, having identified a particular pest, disease or disorder, growers should refer to other AHDB Horticulture publications which contain information on currently available control measures. Nathalie Key Knowledge Exchange Manager (Narcissus) AHDB Horticulture Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Phenology of the Major Insect Pests of Quinoa
    agriculture Article Seasonal Phenology of the Major Insect Pests of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and Their Natural Enemies in a Traditional Zone and Two New Production Zones of Peru Luis Cruces 1,2,*, Eduardo de la Peña 3 and Patrick De Clercq 2 1 Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agronomy, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima 12-056, Peru 2 Department of Plants & Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium; [email protected] 3 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +051-999-448427 Received: 30 November 2020; Accepted: 14 December 2020; Published: 18 December 2020 Abstract: Over the last decade, the sown area of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) has been increasingly expanding in Peru, and new production fields have emerged, stretching from the Andes to coastal areas. The fields at low altitudes have the potential to produce higher yields than those in the highlands. This study investigated the occurrence of insect pests and the natural enemies of quinoa in a traditional production zone, San Lorenzo (in the Andes), and in two new zones at lower altitudes, La Molina (on the coast) and Majes (in the “Maritime Yunga” ecoregion), by plant sampling and pitfall trapping. Our data indicated that the pest pressure in quinoa was higher at lower elevations than in the highlands. The major insect pest infesting quinoa at high densities in San Lorenzo was Eurysacca melanocampta; in La Molina, the major pests were E. melanocampta, Macrosiphum euphorbiae and Liriomyza huidobrensis; and in Majes, Frankliniella occidentalis was the most abundant pest.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: the Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus
    Supplementary Aphid Transmission of Potyvirus: The Largest Plant-Infecting RNA Virus Genus Kiran R. Gadhave 1,2,*,†, Saurabh Gautam 3,†, David A. Rasmussen 2 and Rajagopalbabu Srinivasan 3 1 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA 2 Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]. † Authors contributed equally. Received: 13 May 2020; Accepted: 15 July 2020; Published: date Abstract: Potyviruses are the largest group of plant infecting RNA viruses that cause significant losses in a wide range of crops across the globe. The majority of viruses in the genus Potyvirus are transmitted by aphids in a non-persistent, non-circulative manner and have been extensively studied vis-à-vis their structure, taxonomy, evolution, diagnosis, transmission and molecular interactions with hosts. This comprehensive review exclusively discusses potyviruses and their transmission by aphid vectors, specifically in the light of several virus, aphid and plant factors, and how their interplay influences potyviral binding in aphids, aphid behavior and fitness, host plant biochemistry, virus epidemics, and transmission bottlenecks. We present the heatmap of the global distribution of potyvirus species, variation in the potyviral coat protein gene, and top aphid vectors of potyviruses. Lastly, we examine how the fundamental understanding of these multi-partite interactions through multi-omics approaches is already contributing to, and can have future implications for, devising effective and sustainable management strategies against aphid- transmitted potyviruses to global agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection and Molecular Characterization of the Iris Severe Mosaic Virus-Ir Isolate from Iran
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION RESEARCH Vol. 55, No. 3 (2015) DOI: 10.1515/jppr-2015-0032 Detection and molecular characterization of the Iris severe mosaic virus-Ir isolate from Iran Masoud Nateqi, Mina Koohi Habibi, Akbar Dizadji*, Shirin Parizad Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Engineering, University College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, 31587-77871, Iran Received: January 28, 2015 Accepted: June 26, 2015 Abstract: Iris belongs to the Iridaceae family. It is one of the most important pharmaceutical and ornamental plants in the world. To assess the potyvirus incidence in natural resources of iris plants in Iran, Antigen Coated-Plate ELISA (ACP-ELISA) was performed on 490 symptomatic rhizomatous iris leaf samples, which detected the potyvirus in 36.7% of the samples. Genomic 3’ end of one mechanically non-transmitted potyvirus isolate, comprising a 3’ untranslated region (390 bp) and C-terminus of the coat protein (CP) gene (459 bp), was amplified by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which was ligated into pTG19-T vector. The nucleotide sequence of amplicons was compared with related sequences, using Blastn software available at NCBI GenBank, and showed the highest similarity with Iris severe mosaic virus (ISMV) isolates. The nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of the CP C-terminus region was more than 83% identical with other ISMV isolates, therefore this isolate was designated as ISMV-Ir. This new ISMV isolate is closely related to the Chinese ISMV-PHz in phylogenetic analysis, based on the partial nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of the CP region.
    [Show full text]
  • Host Plant Volatiles and the Sexual Reproduction of the Potato Aphid, Macrosiphum Euphorbiae
    Insects 2014, 5, 783-792; doi:10.3390/insects5040783 OPEN ACCESS insects ISSN 2075-4450 www.mdpi.com/journal/insects/ Article Host Plant Volatiles and the Sexual Reproduction of the Potato Aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae Jessica Hurley 1, Hiroyuki Takemoto 2,3, Junji Takabayashi 2 and Jeremy N. McNeil 1,* 1 Department of Biology, Western University, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Center for Ecological Research, Kyoto University 2-509-3, Hirano, Otsu 520-2113, Japan; E-Mails: [email protected] (H.T.); [email protected] (J.T.) 3 Research Institute of Green Science and Technology, Shizuoka University 836, Ohya, Shizuoka 422-8529, Japan * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-519-661-3487; Fax: +1-519-661-3935. Received: 1 April 2014; in revised form: 9 October 2014 / Accepted: 9 October 2014 / Published: 24 October 2014 Abstract: In late summer, heteroecious aphids, such as the potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae, move from their secondary summer host plants to primary host plants, where the sexual oviparae mate and lay diapausing eggs. We tested the hypothesis that volatiles of the primary host, Rosa rugosa, would attract the gynoparae, the parthenogenetic alate morph that produce oviparae, as well as the alate males foraging for suitable mates. In wind tunnel assays, both gynoparae and males oriented towards and reached rose cuttings significantly more often than other odour sources, including potato, a major secondary host. The response of males was as high to rose cuttings alone as to potato with a calling virgin oviparous female.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing an Aphid Apocalypse
    Aphids & Their Nat. Enemies Topics of Discussion . The nature of the beast . Management options o Natural enemies o Promoting nat. enemy establishment Aphids What’s the deal? . Order = Hemiptera (True Bugs) . Soft bodied, pear shaped, 1-4 mm long . Characteristic stovepipe-looking formation on rear ends (cornicles) . > 30 different species attack greenhouse crops . Cause significant crop & revenue loss . Difficult to manage Aphids Suck What do they do? . Piercing sucking mouthparts . Insert stylets through plant tissue & remove sap from phloem o Distortion, stunting, viruses . Poop all over the plants (honeydew) & cause sooty mold growth . Scare customers away o Visual & food quality issue Where Did They Come From? They don’t just magically appear!!!! . Weeds . Overwintered pet plants (continuous cropping) . Hitchhiked on cuttings/stock . The big outside world The Nature of Aphids In order to manage pests, you should know about their LIFE CYCLES . What do their life stages look like? . When in their life do they causes damage? . What stages do natural enemies attack? o What are the life cycles of the natural enemies? They Just Want to Live Their Lives Like The Rest of Us Life Cycle Basics Immature insects are called either NYMPHS or LARVAE What’s the difference? In the simplest terms…. METAMORPHOSIS (changes through molting/shedding their skin) . Simple – Immatures - NYMPHS (similar body form as adult, not sexually mature & wingless) ex. Aphids & Stink bugs . Complete – Immatures - LARVAE (look very different from the adult, go through a pupa stage). ex. Beetles & Flies Life Cycle How do aphids become a problem? Nymphs Inside greenhouses its simple…… Incoming aphids finds a preferred host Adults Then they multiply FAST!!!! .
    [Show full text]
  • For Biological Control of the Soybean Aphid, Aphis Glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae), in the Continental United States
    United States Department of Agriculture Field Release of Aphelinus Marketing and Regulatory glycinis (Hymenoptera: Programs Animal and Aphelinidae) for Biological Plant Health Inspection Service Control of the Soybean Aphid, Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae), in the Continental United States Environmental Assessment, September 2012 Field Release of Aphelinus glycinis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) for Biological Control of the Soybean Aphid, Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae), in the Continental United States Environmental Assessment, September 2012 Agency Contact: Shirley Wager-Page, Branch Chief Pest Permitting Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Road, Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737–1236 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Mention of companies or commercial products in this report does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) over others not mentioned. USDA neither guarantees or warrants the standard of any product mentioned. Product names are mentioned solely to report factually on available data and to provide specific information.
    [Show full text]
  • Geenhouse IPM: Sustainable Aphid Control ~
    800-346-9140 GREENHOUSE IPM: SUSTAINABLE APHID CONTROL Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas PEST MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL NOTE www.attra.ncat.org ATTRA is the national sustainable agriculture information center funded by the USDA’s Rural Business -- Cooperative Service. Abstract: This publication summarizes IPM for greenhouse aphids on both vegetable and ornamental crops. Focus is on monitoring, sanitation, biological controls, biorational pesticides, and insect growth regulators. Supplemental tables include information on the newest biopesticides and biological control organisms. By Lane Greer NCAT Agriculture Specialist June 2000 The following document focuses on least-toxic methods for dealing with aphids in greenhouses. For general information on greenhouse IPM, request ATTRA’s publication Integrated Pest Management for Greenhouse Crops, which covers topics such as screening to eliminate pests, weed management, and disease control. Introduction There are approximately 4,000 aphid species in the world. Life cycles and preferred hosts vary with each type of aphid. Common aphid pests of greenhouse crops include the green peach aphid Courtesy Of Hercules Inc., Wilmington, Delaware (Myzus persicae), the melon/cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii), the chrysanthemum aphid (Macrosiphum rosae), the potato aphid (Macrosiphoniella sanborni), the rose aphid (Macrosiphum euphorbiae) and the foxglove aphid (Aulacorthum solani) (1). Contents The green peach aphid is probably the most Introduction.......................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • High Tunnel Conf 2018
    Identifying the Good, the Bad & the Ugly Cheryl Frank Sullivan & Margaret Skinner ~ Univ. of Vermont, Entomology Research Laboratory Anna Wallingford ~ Univ. of NH Extension Carol Glenister ~ IPM Laboratories, Inc. Expand Your Tunnel Vision: High Tunnel Production Conference ~ Manchester, NH ~ December 3-4, 2018 Session Format . Break into 4 groups . Cover 4 general pest-natural enemy associations (~10 min in each) focusing on some commercially available natural enemies. Brief review on screen then perform hands on activities Why Id Anyways? . If you use natural enemies, some are generalists (attack many) and some are specialists (attack few or one). Don’t make an expensive mistake! . Knowing, scouting & monitoring for pests & natural enemies critical for successful management program • Know their life cycles – at what stages do pests get attacked/natural enemies attack • How many plants are infested & at what magnitude • Keep track of when management occurred, rates used & effectiveness . Where & how to look • Leaf undersides, growth tips, tap blossoms to dislodge arthropods • Use magnifying apparatus (hand lens) properly . When in doubt, call a specialist (University Extension or Biocontrol Supplier) Spider Mites ~ Damage Yellow stippling visible on leaf surfaces Webbing Cucumber Tomato Yellow flecking on fruits Tomato Tomato Spider Mites ~ Natural Enemies: Id 2 dark spots Predatory Mites The Pest Predatory midge (fly) Predatory as yellow-brown maggot/larva Phytoseiulis persimilis (Specialist – eats only SM – bright red color – fast moving) red overwintering Feltiella acarisuga phase (Generalists – eats SM, other small arthropods & pollen – tan/yellow colors – fast moving) mosquito like adult Neoseiulus (Amblyseius) californicus & fallacis Tomato Thrips ~ Damage Tomato Virus symptoms (TSWV) Onion Distortion, yellowing & flecking of fruits Silver patches with black dots (frass) Tomato Cucumber Thrips ~ Natural Enemies: Id Predatory Mite The Pests Neoseiulus (Amblyseius) cucumeris Thrips tabaci (Onion) & Frankliniella spp.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Virus from Macrosiphum Euphorbiae with Similarities to Members of the Family Flaviviridae Marcella Teixeira,1 Noa Sela,2 James Ng,3,4 Clare L
    Journal of General Virology (2016), 97, 1261–1271 DOI 10.1099/jgv.0.000414 A novel virus from Macrosiphum euphorbiae with similarities to members of the family Flaviviridae Marcella Teixeira,1 Noa Sela,2 James Ng,3,4 Clare L. Casteel,5 Hsuan-Chieh Peng,3 Sadia Bekal,6 Thomas Girke,4,7 Murad Ghanim8 and Isgouhi Kaloshian1,4 Correspondence 1Department of Nematology, University of California, Riverside, California, USA Isgouhi Kaloshian 2Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel [email protected] 3Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, California, USA 4Institute of Integrative Genome Biology, University of California, Riverside, California, USA 5Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, California, USA 6Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA 7Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California, USA 8Department of Entomology, Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel A virus with a large genome was identified in the transcriptome of the potato aphid (Macrosiphum euphorbiae) and was named Macrosiphum euphorbiae virus 1 (MeV-1). The MeV-1 genome is 22 780 nt in size, including 39 and 59 non-coding regions, with a single large ORF encoding a putative polyprotein of 7333 aa. The C-terminal region of the predicted MeV-1 polyprotein contained sequences with similarities to helicase, methyltransferase and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) motifs, while the N-terminal region lacked any motifs including structural proteins. Phylogenetic analysis of the helicase placed MeV-1 close to pestiviruses, while the RdRp region placed it close to pestiviruses and flaviviruses, suggesting MeV-1 has a positive-polarity ssRNA genome and is a member of the family Flaviviridae.
    [Show full text]