Special Council Agenda Package

City of Port Moody Special Council Agenda

April 14, 2020 7:00 pm Electronic Meeting via Zoom

Pages

1. Call to Order

1.1 Art at Council

Verbal Report: Councillor Zoë Royer, Chair, Arts and Culture Committee

2. General Matters

3. Consent Agenda

Note: Council may adopt in one motion all recommendations appearing on the Consent Agenda or, prior to the vote, request that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed in section 4 for debate or discussion, voting in opposition to a recommendation, or declaring a conflict of interest with an item.

Recommendation:

THAT the recommendations contained in the items presented in the April 14, 2020 Special Council Consent agenda be approved.

3.1 Corporate Policy Update - Proclamations 6

Memo: Corporate Services Department – Legislative Services Division, dated March 12, 2020

Recommendation(s):

THAT Corporate Policy 01-0630-2016-01 – Proclamations be adopted as recommended in the memo dated March 12, 2020 from the Corporate Services Department – Legislative Services Division regarding Corporate Policy Update – Proclamations. 2

3.2 2020 Work Plan - Arts and Culture Committee 10

Report: Arts and Culture Committee, dated March 6, 2020

Recommendation(s):

THAT the 2020 Arts and Culture Committee Work Plan be approved as recommended in the report dated March 6, 2020 from the Arts and Culture Committee regarding 2020 Work Plan – Arts and Culture Committee.

3.3 2020 Work Plan - Climate Action Committee 14

Report: Climate Action Committee, dated March 6, 2020

Recommendation(s):

THAT the 2020 Climate Action Committee Work Plan be approved as recommended in the report dated March 6, 2020 from the Climate Action Committee regarding 2020 Work Plan – Climate Action Committee.

3.4 2020 Work Plan - Economic Development Committee 18

Report: Economic Development Committee, dated March 5, 2020

Recommendation(s):

THAT the 2020 Economic Development Committee Work Plan be approved as recommended in the report dated March 5, 2020 from the Economic Development Committee regarding 2020 Work Plan – Economic Development Committee.

3.5 2020 Work Plan - Environmental Protection Committee 22

Report: Environmental Protection Committee, dated March 6, 2020

Recommendation(s):

THAT the 2020 Environmental Protection Committee Work Plan be approved as recommended in the report dated March 6, 2020 from the Environmental Protection Committee regarding 2020 Work Plan – Environmental Protection Committee.

3.6 2020 Work Plan - Heritage Commission 26

Report: Heritage Commission, dated February 24, 2020

Recommendation(s):

THAT the 2020 Heritage Commission Work Plan be approved as recommended in the report dated February 24, 2020 from the Heritage Commission regarding 2020 Work Plan – Heritage Commission. 3

3.7 2020 Work Plan - Parks and Recreation Commission 30

Report: Parks and Recreation Commission, dated March 12, 2020

Recommendation(s):

THAT the 2020 Parks and Recreation Work Plan be approved as recommended in the report dated March 12, 2020 from the Parks and Recreation Commission regarding 2020 Work Plan – Parks and Recreation Commission.

3.8 2020 Work Plan - Seniors Focus Committee 34

Report: Seniors Focus Committee, dated February 28, 2020

Recommendation(s):

THAT the 2020 Seniors Focus Committee Work Plan be approved as recommended in the report dated February 28, 2020 from the Seniors Focus Committee regarding 2020 Work Plan – Seniors Focus Committee.

3.9 2020 Work Plan - Tourism Committee 38

Report: Tourism Committee, dated February 27, 2020

Recommendation(s):

THAT the 2020 Tourism Committee Work Plan be approved as recommended in the report dated February 27, 2020 from the Tourism Committee regarding 2020 Work Plan – Tourism Committee.

3.10 2020 Work Plan - Transportation Committee 42

Report: Transportation Committee, dated February 24, 2020

Recommendation(s):

THAT the 2020 Transportation Committee Work Plan be approved as recommended in the report dated February 24, 2020 from the Transportation Committee regarding 2020 Work Plan – Transportation Committee.

3.11 Union of BC Municipalities Membership Renewal 2020 46

Memo: Executive Assistant to Mayor and Council, dated March 5, 2020

Recommendation(s):

THAT the City of Port Moody renew its membership in the Union of BC Municipalities (UBCM) and remit the 2020 annual UBCM dues of $14,305.07 as recommended in the memo dated March 5, 2020 from the Executive Assistant to Mayor and Council regarding Union of BC Municipalities Membership Renewal 2020. 4

3.12 LCRB Application for La Bamba Lounge and Patio Endorsement 51

Report: Planning and Development Department – Building, Bylaw, and Licensing Division, dated April 3, 2020

Recommendation(s):

THAT staff be directed to advise the Liquor and Cannabis Regulation Branch that Port Moody wishes to opt out of the public consultation process, as recommended in the report dated April 3, 2020 from the Planning and Development Department – Building, Bylaw, and Licensing Division, regarding LCRB Application for La Bamba Lounge and Patio Endorsement.

3.13 Youth Sports Award 64

Report: Youth Focus Committee, March 17, 2020

Recommendation(s):

THAT the report dated March 17, 2020 from the Youth Focus Committee regarding Youth Sports Award be received for information.

4. Items Removed from the Consent Agenda

5. New Business

5.1 OCP Amendment and Rezoning - 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 70 St. Johns Street (Multi-Family Residential, Bold Properties)

Report: Planning and Development Department – Development Planning Division, dated March 11, 2020

Recommendation(s):

THAT City of Port Moody Official Community Plan, 2014, No. 2955, Amendment Bylaw No. 24, 2020, No. 3242 (2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street) and City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw, 2018, No. 2937, Amendment Bylaw No. 33, 2020, No. 3243 (2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street) (RM8) be read a first time as recommended in the report dated March 11, 2020 from the Planning and Development Department – Development Planning Division regarding OCP Amendment and Rezoning – 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street (Multi-Family Residential, Bold Properties);

AND THAT City of Port Moody Road Closure Bylaw – 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street, 2020, No. 3244 be read a first time. 5

6. Other Business

6.1 Proclamation - Melanoma Awareness Month 175

Recommendation(s):

THAT May 2020 be proclaimed Melanoma Awareness Month in the City of Port Moody.

6.2 Proclamation - 2020 Neighbourhood House Week 179

Recommendation(s):

THAT May 3-9, 2020 be proclaimed Neighbourhood House Week in the City of Port Moody.

6.3 Proclamation - Cystic Fibrosis Awareness Month 184

Recommendation(s):

THAT May 2020 be proclaimed Cystic Fibrosis Awareness Month in the City of Port Moody.

7. Information Items

7.1 Metro Vancouver Board in Brief 187

• Metro Vancouver Board in Brief - February 28, 2020 • Metro Vancouver Board in Brief - March 27, 2020

7.2 Council Correspondence 203

• Letter dated February 27, 2020 to Minister Selina Robinson re Property Tax Reform • Letter dated March 3, 2020 from SFU Faculty of Science re Letter of Intent to Develop an Urban Coastal and Marine Science Centre in Port Moody

8. Adjournment 6

Date: March 12, 2020 Submitted by: Corporate Services Department – Legislative Services Division Subject: Corporate Policy Update – Proclamations

At the Regular Council meeting held on February 25, 2020, Council passed the following resolution:

RC20/125 THAT staff be directed to revise the Corporate Policy on Proclamations to handle proclamation requests in the same manner as Lighting Requests.

Staff have revised the Corporate Policy on Proclamations as directed. The revised Corporate Policy is included as Attachment 1 for Council consideration of adoption. The recommended resolution is:

Attachment(s) 1. Corporate Policy – 01-0630-2016-01 – Proclamations.

1 7

Report Approval Details

Document Title: Corporate Policy Update - Proclamations.docx

Attachments: - Attachment 1 - Corporate Policy - 01-0630-2016-01 - Proclamations.pdf

Final Approval Date: Apr 3, 2020

This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Rosemary Lodge, Manager of Communications and Engagement - Mar 30, 2020 - 10:12 AM

Paul Rockwood, General Manager of Finance and Technology - Mar 31, 2020 - 9:14 AM

Angie Parnell, General Manager of Corporate Services - Mar 31, 2020 - 9:26 AM

Tim Savoie, City Manager - Apr 3, 2020 - 9:56 AM

2 8

Section: Administration 01 Sub-Section: Proclamations and Special Declarations 0630 Title: Proclamations 2016-01

Related Policies

Number Title 01-0530-2016-01 Delegations to Council

Approvals

Approval Date: June 14, 2016 Resolution #: RC16/235

Amended: September 19, 2017 Resolution #: RC(CW)17/031 (CW17/117)

Amended: Resolution #:

EDMS#352063 1 9 Corporate Policy Manual Proclamations

Policy The Council of the City of Port Moody receives requests for formal pronouncement of proclamations from individuals and groups representing non-profit societies and organizations wishing to raise awareness of an upcoming event, campaign, or provincial or national day they wish to celebrate at a local level.

Proclamation requests must be submitted in writing.

Procedures An individual or organization seeking a Council Proclamation shall submit a request in writing to the Corporate Officer. The request should include all relevant information and may include a sample proclamation. Legislative Services Division staff shall acknowledge proclamation requests upon receipt.

Requests for Proclamations are placed on the next available Regular Council meeting agenda for Council consideration under section 10 – Other Business.

Once Council has resolved to issue the proclamation, Legislative Services Division staff will prepare and issue a proclamation certificate to the requestor.

Monitoring/Authority This policy is to be administered and monitored by the Legislative Services Division.

EDMS#352063 2 10

Date: March 6, 2020 Submitted by: Arts and Culture Committee Subject: 2020 Work Plan – Arts and Culture Committee

Purpose To seek Council approval for the 2020 Work Plan – Arts and Culture Committee.

Recommended Resolution

Background Per the Council Committee System Policy, committee terms begin in January and end in December. Committees are required to submit an annual Work Plan in the spring for Council approval.

Discussion At its January and February 2020 meetings, the Arts and Culture Committee discussed potential Work Plan items and passed the following resolution:

ACC20/007 THAT the 2020 Committee Work Plan be formed from the mandatory and selected items.

The draft 2020 Arts and Culture Committee Work Plan is included as Attachment 1.

Other Option THAT the proposed 2020 Arts and Culture Committee Work Plan contained in the report dated March 6, 2020 from the Arts and Culture Committee regarding the 2020 Work Plan – Arts and Culture Committee be amended as directed by Council.

1 11

Financial Implications Some 2020 Work Plan items may require funding. The Arts and Culture Committee will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time for projects requiring funding and will recommend a budget and funding source at that time.

Communications and Civic Engagement Initiatives No communications or civic engagement initiatives are required with the approval of the work plan. Should any communications and civic engagement initiatives be required as part of a work plan item, the Arts and Culture Committee will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives The proposed Work Plan aligns with the Council strategic objective of create an attractive and vibrant community through events, arts, and culture.

Attachment 1. 2020 Arts and Culture Committee Work Plan.

Report Author Philip Lo Committee Coordinator

2 12

Report Approval Details

Document Title: 2020 Work Plan - Arts and Culture Committee.docx

Attachments: - Attachment 1 - 2020 Arts and Culture Committee Work Plan.pdf

Final Approval Date: Mar 17, 2020

This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Dorothy Shermer, Corporate Officer - Mar 6, 2020 - 5:23 PM

Angie Parnell, General Manager of Corporate Services - Mar 6, 2020 - 5:24 PM

Rosemary Lodge, Manager of Communications and Engagement - Mar 9, 2020 - 11:14 AM

Paul Rockwood, General Manager of Finance and Technology - Mar 9, 2020 - 11:40 AM

Tim Savoie, City Manager - Mar 17, 2020 - 7:49 AM

3 13

Proposed 2020 Arts and Culture Committee Work Plan Calendar MONTH JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE

FOCUS AREA  Orientation  Artist Symposium  Artist Symposium  Old Firehall No.1 Site  2020 Artist grant  Artist Symposium Temporary Uses  Work Plan  Artist Micro Studios and  Artist Micro Studios and  Art in Public Spaces Workshop  Continuation of the

temporary uses for vacant temporary uses for vacant  Artist Symposium Queens Street Plaza lots on Clarke Street lots on Clarke Street project with greater  Continuation of the Queens involvement from the  City Wayfinding Street Plaza project with Arts Centre and greater involvement from the greater connectivity  Work Plan Arts Centre and greater with the area assets connectivity with the area assets  Increase public awareness of the  Increase public awareness of positive impacts of the positive impacts of investing into the investing into the local arts local arts economy, economy, including including volunteering on the Arts and volunteering on the Culture Committee Arts and Culture Committee  Street banner theme

MONTH JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER

FOCUS AREA  Artist Symposium  Artist Symposium  Artist Symposium  Artist Symposium

 Explore the meaning of the  2020 Artist grant  Community street banner  Explore the meaning of the “City

“City of the Arts” and how selections of the Arts” and how to achieve to achieve it  2020 Arts Award it  Explore the meaning of the  Consider the feasibility of a  Explore the meaning of the “City of the Arts” and how to  Fair compensation for artists “City of the Arts” and how sculptural art project, such achieve it as a temporary sculpture to achieve it park  Fair compensation for artists  Consider the feasibility of a

sculptural art project, such as a temporary sculpture park

Date: March 6, 2020 Submitted by: Climate Action Committee Subject: 2020 Work Plan – Climate Action Committee

Purpose To seek Council approval for the 2020 Work Plan – Climate Action Committee.

Recommended Resolution

THAT the 2020 Climate Action Committee Work Plan be approved as recommended in the report dated March 6, 2020 from the Climate Action Committee regarding 2020 Work Plan – Climate Action Committee.

Background Per the Council Committee System Policy, committee terms begin in January and end in December. Committees are required to submit an annual Work Plan in the spring for Council approval.

Discussion At its January and February 2020 meetings, the Climate Action Committee discussed potential Work Plan items and passed the following resolution:

CAC20/003 THAT the draft 2020 Climate Action Committee Work Plan be adopted as amended.

The draft 2020 Climate Action Committee Work Plan is included as Attachment 1.

Other Option THAT the proposed 2020 Climate Action Committee Work Plan contained in the report dated March 6, 2020 from the Climate Action Committee regarding the 2020 Work Plan – Climate Action Committee be amended as directed by Council.

1 15

Financial Implications Some 2020 Work Plan items may require funding. The Climate Action Committee will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time for projects requiring funding and will recommend a budget and funding source at that time.

Communications and Civic Engagement Initiatives No communications or civic engagement initiatives are required with the approval of the work plan. Should any communications and civic engagement initiatives be required as part of a work plan item, the Climate Action Committee will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives The proposed Work Plan aligns with the following Council strategic objectives:

 maintain and enhance Port Moody’s natural and built assets while reducing the impact on our planet;  expand and enhance policies to guide environmental goals and sustainability programs; and  provide leadership in climate change by thinking globally and acting locally.

Attachment 1. 2020 Climate Action Committee Work Plan.

Report Author Philip Lo Committee Coordinator

2 16

Report Approval Details

Document Title: 2020 Work Plan - Climate Action Committee.docx

Attachments: - Attachment 1 - 2020 Climate Action Committee Work Plan.pdf

Final Approval Date: Mar 17, 2020

This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Dorothy Shermer, Corporate Officer - Mar 6, 2020 - 3:11 PM

Angie Parnell, General Manager of Corporate Services - Mar 6, 2020 - 5:31 PM

Rosemary Lodge, Manager of Communications and Engagement - Mar 9, 2020 - 11:10 AM

Paul Rockwood, General Manager of Finance and Technology - Mar 9, 2020 - 11:39 AM

Tim Savoie, City Manager - Mar 17, 2020 - 7:47 AM

3 17

2020 Climate Action Committee Draft Work Plan Calendar MONTH JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE

FOCUS AREA  Committee Orientation  Climate action plan  Climate Action  Energy Step Code  Film subcommittee update  Climate Action  Ethelo eDemocracy tool update Committee award update  Contacting the Federal Plan update demonstration  Film subcommittee  Discuss continuing  Climate action plan government regarding its  Sustainability  2019 Annual Report review update speaker series community engagement plan to plant two billion trees Report Card  2020 Work Plan  Ethelo eDemocracy  Guest speaker: Climate by 2050, and how this could Update follow‐up lens in Official fit into the City’s own tree  Old Firehall No. 1 Site Community Plans bylaws. Temporary Uses

MONTH JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER

FOCUS AREA  Film Subcommittee update  Review the status and  Energy Step Code  Climate Action Plan update  Energy Step Code update prioritization of short‐ update  Guest speaker: food systems  Guest Speaker: Thermal term and long‐terms  Film subcommittee comfort in buildings projects for corporate update and community energy  Guest speaker: Passive and emission House building  Climate action plan community engagement

EDMS#429061 18

Date: March 5, 2020 Submitted by: Economic Development Committee Subject: 2020 Work Plan – Economic Development Committee

Purpose To seek Council approval for the 2020 Economic Development Committee Work Plan.

Recommended Resolution

Background Per the Council Committee System Policy, committee terms begin in January and end in December. Committees are required to submit an annual Work Plan in the spring for Council approval.

Discussion At its January and March 2020 meetings, the Economic Development Committee discussed potential Work Plan items and passed the following resolution:

EDC20/005 THAT the 2020 Economic Development Committee Work Plan be approved.

The draft 2020 Economic Development Committee Work Plan is included as Attachment 1.

Other Option THAT the proposed 2020 Economic Development Committee Work Plan contained in the report dated March 4, 2020 from the Economic Development Committee regarding the 2020 Work Plan – Economic Development Committee be amended as directed by Council.

1 19

Financial Implications Some 2020 Work Plan items may require funding. The Economic Development Committee will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time for projects requiring funding and will recommend a budget and funding source at that time.

Communications and Civic Engagement Initiatives No communications or civic engagement initiatives are required with the approval of the work plan. Should any communications and civic engagement initiatives be required as part of a work plan item, the Economic Development Committee will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives The proposed Work Plan aligns with the following Council strategic objectives:

 support the growth of businesses and business neighbourhood development;  attract well-paid jobs and new businesses in key sectors;  ensure a sustainable and resilient municipal economy and diversify the City’s revenue sources; and  ensure future community growth is carefully considered and strategically managed consistent with the targets approved in our Official Community Plan.

Attachment 1. Draft 2020 Economic Development Committee Work Plan.

Report Author Jennifer Mills Committee Coordinator

2 20

Report Approval Details

Document Title: 2020 Work Plan - Economic Development Committee.docx

Attachments: - Attachment 1 - 2020 Economic Development Committee Work Plan.pdf

Final Approval Date: Mar 17, 2020

This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Dorothy Shermer, Corporate Officer - Mar 16, 2020 - 9:48 AM

Tim Savoie, City Manager - Mar 17, 2020 - 11:24 AM

3 21

2020 Economic Development Committee Work Plan Calendar MONTH JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE

FOCUS AREA ‐ Committee orientation ‐ Council and EDC Joint ‐ Council and EDC Joint ‐ Wayfinding working group ‐ OCP review/discussion with ‐ Business roundtable ‐ 2019 Annual Report Workshop Workshop debrief update Planning ‐ Small Business (T. ‐ Council and EDC Joint ‐ “State of Business” research ‐ State of business draft survey ‐ Begin planning for economic Barker, L. Beecroft, Workshop preparation (survey, roundtable) ‐ Review draft roundtable development strategy Shop Local Port ‐ 2020 Work Plan ‐ Economic development agenda ‐ Innovation Ecosystems in Metro Moody) ‐ Wayfinding branding ‐ Moody Centre TOD Vancouver (S. Lubik, SFU) ‐ Microsite working developers’ group ‐ SFU marine research centre group update presentation presentation ‐ Jobs and Business ‐ Spike Awards working group District working group update ‐ Clarke St revitalization update

MONTH JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER

FOCUS AREA ‐ Review business survey results ‐ Metro Vancouver Regional ‐ Spike Awards selection of ‐ Debrief with Council re: review of ‐ Annual Report and roundtable feedback Prosperity Service winners (event: October 22) 2020, proposed work in 2021 ‐ Prepare for permits and presentation ‐ Begin drafting 2021 Work licensing review ‐ Transportation Committee Plan ‐ Website improvements workshop ‐ Economic profile ‐ Capilano University X/R and immersive technologies

EDMS#429061 22

Date: March 6, 2020 Submitted by: Environmental Protection Committee Subject: 2020 Work Plan – Environmental Protection Committee

Purpose To seek Council approval for the 2020 Work Plan – Environmental Protection Committee.

Recommended Resolution

Background Per the Council Committee System Policy, committee terms begin in January and end in December. Committees are required to submit an annual Work Plan in the spring for Council approval.

Discussion At its January and February 2020 meetings, the Environmental Protection Committee discussed potential Work Plan items and passed the following resolution:

EPC20/005 THAT the draft 2020 Environmental Protection Committee Work Plan be adopted.

The draft 2020 Environmental Protection Committee Work Plan is included as Attachment 1.

Other Option THAT the proposed 2020 Environmental Protection Committee Work Plan contained in the report dated March 6, 2020 from the Environmental Protection Committee regarding the 2020 Work Plan – Environmental Protection Committee be amended as directed by Council.

1 23

Financial Implications Some 2020 Work Plan items may require funding. The Environmental Protection Committee will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time for projects requiring funding and will recommend a budget and funding source at that time.

Communications and Civic Engagement Initiatives No communications or civic engagement initiatives are required with the approval of the work plan. Should any communications and civic engagement initiatives be required as part of a work plan item, the Environmental Protection Committee will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives The proposed Work Plan aligns with the following Council strategic objectives:

Attachment 1. 2020 Environmental Protection Committee Work Plan.

Report Author Philip Lo Committee Coordinator

2 24

Report Approval Details

Document Title: 2020 Work Plan - Environmental Protection Committee.docx

Attachments: - Attachment 1 - 2020 Environmental Protection Committee Work Plan.pdf

Final Approval Date: Mar 17, 2020

This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Dorothy Shermer, Corporate Officer - Mar 6, 2020 - 3:51 PM

Angie Parnell, General Manager of Corporate Services - Mar 6, 2020 - 5:37 PM

Rosemary Lodge, Manager of Communications and Engagement - Mar 9, 2020 - 11:41 AM

Paul Rockwood, General Manager of Finance and Technology - Mar 9, 2020 - 11:45 AM

Tim Savoie, City Manager - Mar 17, 2020 - 7:51 AM

3 25

Environmental Protection Committee Draft 2020 Work Plan Calendar MONTH JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE

FOCUS AREA  Bird‐friendly windows  Climate Action Plan  Pollinator Plants for  Salmon‐safe BC  Tsleil‐Wututh Nation (Karen Devitt, Survey Results (Laura native bees (Robbie Nall, Certification program Burrard Inlet Action confirmed) Sampliner, confirmed) confirmed) (Theresa Fresco, Fraser Plan update (Lindsay  Staff Update: Invasive  Staff update: Sanitary  Forest Bathing/nature Basin Council, Confirmed) Ogsten, Confirmed) Species update (Angela Sewer Replacement therapy (speaker TBD)  Monofilament fishing lines

Crampton, Confirmed); Project (Shoreline Trail (EPC member Damian Event Updates North, Confirmed); Inlet Regan) (confirmed) Sports Field (Confirmed)

MONTH JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER

FOCUS AREA  Staff Update: Human‐Bear  Rodenticides (Erika  Blue Water Community  Developing statements or Conflict Plan, (Confirmed); Nassunchuk, District of (Council of Canadians) declarations of support Environmentally Sensitive North Van, Confirmed) (speaker TBD) and solidarity for Area Management  Staff Update: Spill  Staff Updates: Urban communities on the front Strategy Update; Response Guidelines; Forest Management lines of environmental Riparian Variance Strategy protection (speaker TBD) process (confirmed)  Sustainability Report Card Update (Planning, Confirmed)

EDMS#491653 26

Date: February 24, 2020 Submitted by: Heritage Commission Subject: 2020 Work Plan – Heritage Commission

Purpose To seek Council approval for the 2020 Heritage Commission Work Plan.

Recommended Resolution

THAT the 2020 Heritage Commission Work Plan be approved as recommended in the report dated February 24, 2020 from the Heritage Commission regarding 2020 Work Plan – Heritage Commission.

Background Per the Council Committee System Policy, committee terms begin in January and end in December. Committees are required to submit an annual Work Plan in the spring for Council approval.

Discussion At its January and February 2020 meetings, the Heritage Commission discussed potential Work Plan items and passed the following resolution:

HC20/003 THAT the 2020 Heritage Commission Work Plan be approved as amended.

The draft 2020 Heritage Commission Work Plan and budget is included as Attachment 1.

Other Option THAT the proposed 2020 Heritage Commission Work Plan contained in the report dated February 24, 2020 from the Heritage Commission regarding 2020 Work Plan – Heritage Commission be amended as directed by Council.

Financial Implications The 2020 Financial Plan includes an allocation of $10,000.00 for the Heritage Commission’s Work Plan and budget in 2020. Some 2020 Work Plan items may require additional funding. The Heritage Commission will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time for projects requiring additional funding and will recommend a budget and funding source at that time.

1 27

Communications and Civic Engagement Initiatives No communications or civic engagement initiatives are required with the approval of the work plan. Should any communications and civic engagement initiatives be required as part of a work plan item, the Heritage Commission will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives The proposed Work Plan aligns with the following Council strategic objectives:

 create an attractive and vibrant community through events, arts, and culture; and  bring people together by activating public spaces.

Attachment 1. Draft 2020 Heritage Commission Work Plan.

Report Author Jennifer Mills Committee Coordinator

2 28

Report Approval Details

Document Title: 2020 Work Plan - Heritage Commission.docx

Attachments: - Attachment 1 - 2020 Heritage Commission Work Plan.pdf

Final Approval Date: Mar 17, 2020

This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Dorothy Shermer, Corporate Officer - Mar 9, 2020 - 10:23 AM

Angie Parnell, General Manager of Corporate Services - Mar 9, 2020 - 12:51 PM

Rosemary Lodge, Manager of Communications and Engagement - Mar 9, 2020 - 2:00 PM

Paul Rockwood, General Manager of Finance and Technology - Mar 9, 2020 - 2:25 PM

Tim Savoie, City Manager - Mar 17, 2020 - 7:52 AM

3 29

2020 Heritage Commission Work Plan Calendar MONTH JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE

FOCUS AREA  Committee Orientation  Review of 2019  Mills Storyboard ‐ Wayfinding Signs  Heritage BC Conference  Statement of Annual Report  Community Outreach and Significance  2020 Work Plan Activities  Community Discussion Outreach and Activities

MONTH JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER

FOCUS AREA  Heritage App development  Ioco Ghost Town Days  Planning for 100th  Planning for Heritage Week  Clarke Street  Heritage Award anniversary 2021 Ioco 2021 Revitalization Plan Townsite  Heritage Grants and Incentives

#490720

Date: March 12, 2020 Submitted by: Parks and Recreation Commission Subject: 2020 Work Plan – Parks and Recreation Commission

Purpose To seek Council approval for the 2020 Work Plan – Parks and Recreation Commission.

Recommended Resolution

Background Per the Council Committee System Policy, committee terms begin in January and end in December. Committees are required to submit an annual Work Plan in the spring for Council approval.

Discussion At its February and March 2020 meetings, the Parks and Recreation Commission discussed potential Work Plan items and passed the following resolution:

PRC20/006 THAT the 2020 Parks and Recreation Commission Work Plan be adopted as amended.

The draft 2020 Parks and Recreation Commission Work Plan is included as Attachment 1.

Other Option THAT the proposed 2020 Parks and Recreation Commission Work Plan contained in the report dated March 12, 2020 from the Parks and Recreation Commission regarding the 2020 Work Plan – Parks and Recreation Commission be amended as directed by Council.

1 31

Financial Implications Some 2020 Work Plan items may require funding. The Parks and Recreation Commission will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time for projects requiring funding and will recommend a budget and funding source at that time.

Communications and Civic Engagement Initiatives No communications or civic engagement initiatives are required with the approval of the work plan. Should any communications and civic engagement initiatives be required as part of a work plan item, the Parks and Recreation Commission will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives The proposed Work Plan aligns with the following Council strategic objectives:

 maintain and enhance Port Moody’s natural and built assets while reducing the impact on our planet;  expand and make the most of our parks and green spaces and design them to create positive and diverse experiences throughout the community;  provide local services and access to amenities for residents of all ages and abilities;  encourage lifelong healthy and active living;  ensure City assets are optimized, maintained, and funded for current and future needs; and  bring people together by activating public spaces.

Attachment 1. Draft 2020 Parks and Recreation Commission Work Plan.

Report Author Jennifer Mills Committee Coordinator

2 32

Report Approval Details

Document Title: 2020 Work Plan - Parks and Recreation Commission.docx

Attachments: - Attachment 1 - 2020 Parks and Recreation Commission Work Plan.pdf

Final Approval Date: Mar 17, 2020

This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Dorothy Shermer, Corporate Officer - Mar 13, 2020 - 10:15 AM

Tim Savoie, City Manager - Mar 17, 2020 - 11:25 AM

3 33

2020 Parks and Recreation Commission Work Plan Calendar – Draft March 11/20

MONTH JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE

FOCUS AREA Snow Day Cancelled Clarke Street Revitalization 2020 Work Plan Inlet Park Redevelopment Parkland Acquisition Strategy – No Parks Left Behind – Update (0.5 hr) Committee Update (1 hr) Walking/Bus Tour of 2019 Annual Report Review Invasive Species Select Parks within a Parks and Recreation Master Plan Neighbourhood (2 hr) 2020 Work Plan Shoreline Trail (North Youth Outdoor Recreation (45 Review (0.5 hr) Section) min) – move to April if time permits Fees and Charges Bylaw Review (0.5 hr) Fees and Charges Bylaw Review (0.5 hr)

MONTH JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER

FOCUS AREA ESA Strategy Update (1.5 hrs) Sports Award – Review Urban Forestry Management Trail Network Plan (2 hrs) Nominations (If Needed) Strategy (2 hrs) Activation of Unused Space ( 0.5 hr) Shoreline House Post Project/Walking Tour Sports Award – Review (Rocky Point Park) (2 hrs) Nominations (5 min)

Document: 494989 34

Date: February 28, 2020 Submitted by: Seniors Focus Committee Subject: 2020 Work Plan – Seniors Focus Committee

Purpose To seek Council approval for the 2020 Seniors Focus Committee Work Plan.

Recommended Resolution

THAT the 2020 Seniors Focus Committee Work Plan be approved as recommended in the report dated February 28, 2020 from the Seniors Focus Committee regarding 2020 Work Plan – Seniors Focus Committee.

Background Per the Council Committee System Policy, committee terms begin in January and end in December. Committees are required to submit an annual Work Plan in the spring for Council approval.

Discussion At its January and February 2020 meetings, the Seniors Focus Committee discussed potential Work Plan items and passed the following resolution:

SFC20/005 THAT the 2020 Seniors Focus Committee Work Plan be endorsed as amended.

The draft 2020 Seniors Focus Committee Work Plan is included as Attachment 1.

Other Option THAT the proposed 2020 Seniors Focus Committee Work Plan contained in the report dated February 28, 2020 from the Seniors Focus Committee regarding the 2020 Work Plan – Seniors Focus Committee be amended as directed by Council.

Financial Implications Some 2020 Work Plan items may require funding. The Seniors Focus Committee will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time for projects requiring funding and will recommend a budget and funding source at that time.

1 35

Communications and Civic Engagement Initiatives No communications or civic engagement initiatives are required with the approval of the work plan. Should any communications and civic engagement initiatives be required as part of a work plan item, the Seniors Focus Committee will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives The proposed Work Plan aligns with the following Council strategic objectives:

 plan for a variety of housing types to meet community needs;  provide local services and access to amenities for residents of all ages and abilities; and  encourage lifelong healthy and active living

Attachment 1. Draft 2020 Seniors Focus Committee Work Plan.

Report Author Jennifer Mills Committee Coordinator

2 36

Report Approval Details

Document Title: 2020 Work Plan - Seniors Focus Committee.docx

Attachments: - Attachment 1 - 2020 Work Plan Calendar - Seniors Focus Committee.pdf

Final Approval Date: Mar 17, 2020

This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Dorothy Shermer, Corporate Officer - Mar 9, 2020 - 10:44 AM

Angie Parnell, General Manager of Corporate Services - Mar 9, 2020 - 12:03 PM

Rosemary Lodge, Manager of Communications and Engagement - Mar 9, 2020 - 1:53 PM

Paul Rockwood, General Manager of Finance and Technology - Mar 9, 2020 - 2:25 PM

Tim Savoie, City Manager - Mar 17, 2020 - 7:53 AM

3 37 2020 Seniors Focus Committee Work Plan Calendar MONTH JANUARY FEBRUARY 6 MARCH 5 APRIL 2 MAY 28 JUNE 18

FOCUS AREA ‐ Presentation of Age‐ ‐ Presentation by Heart ‐ Committee Orientation Friendly Plan by and Stroke Foundation ‐ Review of Final Age‐ ‐ Presentation of Master ‐ Review of ‐ Review of 2019 Annual Cardea Health or Stroke Recovery BC Friendly Plan Transportation Plan recreation Report Consulting on understanding ‐ Review of Accessible Bus Stops programming for ‐ 2020 Work Plan Discussion ‐ Approval of 2020 stroke victims and seniors friendly crosswalk seniors Work Plan ‐ Seniors Statistics 1 page design and upgrades ‐ Seniors Centre ‐ Interim Uses of Old infographic Visioning Exercise Firehall Site ‐ Compilation of presentations happening in the Tri‐ Cities that would be beneficial to seniors

OUTCOMES

MONTH JULY 9 AUGUST SEPTEMBER 3 OCTOBER 1 NOVEMBER 5 DECEMBER ‐ Webpage of seniors resources FOCUS AREA ‐ Seniors Centre Visioning ‐ Explore Age‐Friendly ‐ OCP Review Update in Port Moody/Tri‐Cities ‐ Christmas Social Exercise Business Program ‐ Business Excellence (includes increasing awareness at The Club ‐ Seniors Centre Visioning Awards of how seniors can be involved ‐ Presentation to in city affairs, home Council improvement grants e.g. Efficiency BC, BC Seniors’ Home Renovation Tax Credit, BC Housing Home Adaptations for Independence Program; local health resources)

OUTCOMES

#490720

Date: February 27, 2020 Submitted by: Tourism Committee Subject: 2020 Work Plan – Tourism Committee

Purpose To seek Council approval for the 2020 Tourism Committee Work Plan.

Recommended Resolution

THAT the 2020 Tourism Committee Work Plan be approved as recommended in the report dated February 27, 2020 from the Tourism Committee regarding 2020 Work Plan – Tourism Committee.

Background Per the Council Committee System Policy, committee terms begin in January and end in December. Committees are required to submit an annual Work Plan in the spring for Council approval.

Discussion At its January and February 2020 meetings, the Tourism Committee discussed potential Work Plan items and passed the following resolution:

TOUR20/006 THAT the 2020 Tourism Committee Work Plan be approved.

The draft 2020 Tourism Committee Work Plan is included as Attachment 1.

Other Option THAT the proposed 2020 Tourism Committee Work Plan contained in the report dated February 27, 2020 from the Tourism Committee regarding 2020 Work Plan – Tourism Committee be amended as directed by Council.

Financial Implications Some 2020 Work Plan items may require funding. The Tourism Committee will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time for projects requiring funding and will recommend a budget and funding source at that time.

1 39

Communications and Civic Engagement Initiatives No communications or civic engagement initiatives are required with the approval of the work plan. Should any communications and civic engagement initiatives be required as part of a work plan item, the Tourism Committee will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives The proposed Work Plan aligns with the following Council strategic objectives:

Attachment 1. Draft 2020 Tourism Committee Work Plan.

Report Author Jennifer Mills Committee Coordinator

2 40

Report Approval Details

Document Title: 2020 Work Plan - Tourism Committee.docx

Attachments: - Attachment 1 - 2020 Work Plan Calendar - Tourism Committee.pdf

Final Approval Date: Mar 17, 2020

This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Dorothy Shermer, Corporate Officer - Mar 13, 2020 - 1:37 PM

Tim Savoie, City Manager - Mar 17, 2020 - 11:23 AM

3 41

2020 Tourism Committee Work Plan Calendar MONTH JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE

FOCUS AREA ‐ Committee orientation ‐ Planning for wayfinding ‐ Plan economic impact study ‐ Wayfinding pilot program ‐ Branding exercise on ‐ Review of two passport working group (survey, distribution, data ‐ Joint meeting with Environmental City of the Arts slogan challenge programs ‐ On This Spot assessment collection and analysis, Protection Committee (TSP 4.2) ‐ 2019 Annual Report ‐ Planning for joint meetings report back of findings) ‐ 2020 Work Plan development ‐ Meeting with Brewers’ Row reps ‐ Wayfinding working group report back ‐ Between the Bridges event

MONTH JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER

FOCUS AREA ‐ Joint meeting with Arts and ‐ Joint meeting with Heritage ‐ 2020 Annual Report Culture Committee Commission ‐ Review of Tourism microsite data ‐ Tourism websites research

EDMS#429061 42

Date: February 24, 2020 Submitted by: Transportation Committee Subject: 2020 Work Plan – Transportation Committee

Purpose To seek Council approval for the 2020 Transportation Committee Work Plan.

Recommended Resolution

Background Per the Council Committee System Policy, committee terms begin in January and end in December. Committees are required to submit an annual Work Plan in the spring for Council approval.

Discussion At its January and February 2020 meetings, the Transportation Committee discussed potential Work Plan items and passed the following resolution:

TC20/005 THAT the 2020 Transportation Committee Work Plan be approved with the following amendment:

 add 2020 Master Transportation Plan Update Presentation.

The draft 2020 Transportation Committee Work Plan is included as Attachment 1.

Other Option THAT the proposed 2020 Transportation Committee Work Plan contained in the report dated February 24, 2020 from the Transportation Committee regarding the 2020 Work Plan – Transportation Committee be amended as directed by Council.

1 43

Financial Implications Some 2020 Work Plan items may require funding. The Transportation Committee will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time for projects requiring funding and will recommend a budget and funding source at that time.

Communications and Civic Engagement Initiatives No communications or civic engagement initiatives are required with the approval of the work plan. Should any communications and civic engagement initiatives be required as part of a work plan item, the Transportation Committee will submit a report to Council at the appropriate time.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives The proposed Work Plan aligns with the following Council strategic objectives:

 provide people with a variety of options to move through and around Port Moody safely and efficiently; and  provide local services and access to amenities for residents of all ages and abilities.

Attachment 1. Draft 2020 Transportation Committee Work Plan.

Report Author Jennifer Mills Committee Coordinator

2 44

Report Approval Details

Document Title: 2020 Work Plan - Transportation Committee.docx

Attachments: - Attachment 1 - 2020 Transportation Committee Work Plan.pdf

Final Approval Date: Mar 17, 2020

This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Dorothy Shermer, Corporate Officer - Mar 9, 2020 - 10:25 AM

Angie Parnell, General Manager of Corporate Services - Mar 9, 2020 - 12:51 PM

Rosemary Lodge, Manager of Communications and Engagement - Mar 9, 2020 - 1:59 PM

Paul Rockwood, General Manager of Finance and Technology - Mar 9, 2020 - 2:28 PM

Tim Savoie, City Manager - Mar 17, 2020 - 7:54 AM

3 45

Transportation Committee – 2020 Work Plan Calendar (rev. 3, 6 Feb 2020)

JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE

‐ Committee Orientation ‐ 2020 Annual Work Plan ‐ Accessibility Issues in ‐ Committee Meets Traffic ‐ Spring Street Streetscape ‐ Parking in Port Moody: finalization Walking & Transit: Sr. Focus Review & Coord. Priorities: per Committee review current bylaws, ‐ 2019 Annual Report Ctte role: analyze & Working Group: Group’s request in 2019 emerging needs, ‐ Letter: Transportation Inf. recommend, consider agenda, issues, recommendations, ‐ 2020 Annual Work Plan: Proposals to Encourage traffic islands/intersection opportunities to assist ‐ ICBC Presentation: potential ctte walkabout collect input for draft plan Cycling and Walking in normalization Current initiatives, to identify issues Port Moody ‐ St. John’s Corridor Intersection Safety ‐ Delegation: Walkers’ ‐ Multi Use Path’s Redesign Consultation: Cameras ‐ Coronation Park Caucus ‐ Neighbourhood Traffic discussion: Presentation provide input Transportation Study Calming Policy Update by HUB representative Summary: for Introduction information ‐ MTP Implementation Plan Update

JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER

‐ ICBC/SD43/City ‐ Traffic Signal Technology ‐ Transportation and ‐ Supporting Electric ‐ TBD Partnership: receive Update: Presentation on Climate Action: (CAC Vehicles: infrastructure, update on school traffic City system and future joins) MTP plans, reco’s initiative program from considerations ICBC, PMPD and City staff ‐ ICBC Presentation: ‐ Blanket Speed Limits: ‐ Traffic Signal Current initiatives, Road discuss implications and ‐ TBC TransLink Improvement Program: Improvement Projects potential strategies Presentation: invited to Presentation on present on current topic currently planned signal ‐ Neighbourhood Traffic improvements Calming Policy Update: Draft policy review 46

Date: March 5, 2020 Submitted by: Executive Assistant to Mayor and Council Subject: Union of BC Municipalities Membership Renewal 2020

The City of Port Moody is currently a member of the Union of BC Municipalities (UBCM), which represents and serves all local governments in BC by advocating for common interests.

An invoice for 2020 Memberships is included with this memo. The 2020 annual UBCM dues for the City of Port Moody are calculated based on population and are $14,305.07 for 2020. These membership dues are budgeted for each year. For reference, the City of Port Moody paid $14,343.37 for the annual membership in 2019.

It is recommended that Council renew the City of Port Moody's membership in the UBCM with the following resolution:

Attachment 1. Letter dated March 3, 2020 from President of UBCM regarding 2020 UBCM Membership Dues

1 47

Report Approval Details

Document Title: Union of BC Municipalities Membership Renewal 2020 .docx

Attachments: - Letter dated March 3, 2020 from President of UBCM regarding 2020 UBCM Membership Dues.pdf

Final Approval Date: Mar 17, 2020

This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Dorothy Shermer, Corporate Officer - Mar 5, 2020 - 12:23 PM

Natasha Vander Wal for Rosemary Lodge, Manager of Communications and Engagement – Mar 6, 2020 - 10:48 AM

Paul Rockwood, General Manager of Finance and Technology - Mar 6, 2020 - 2:05 PM

Tim Savoie, City Manager - Mar 17, 2020 - 7:28 AM

2 48 49 50 51

Date: April 3, 2020 Submitted by: Planning and Development Department – Building, Bylaw, and Licensing Division Subject: LCRB Application for La Bamba Lounge and Patio Endorsement

Purpose To seek Council direction with respect to an application received by the Liquor and Cannabis Regulation Branch (LCRB) for a new lounge and patio endorsement.

Recommended Resolution(s)

Background When an establishment applies for a new licence, the provincial Liquor and Cannabis Regulations Branch (LCRB) requires the applicant to undertake a public consultation process. More specifically, the applicant is required to hold an open house to allow the opportunity for attendees to ask questions and provide feedback. The request to seek endorsement for a lounge initiates the public consultation requirement from the LCRB.

Discussion La Bamba is located at 2805 Murray Street. La Bamba has applied to LCLB for a spirit manufacturing and lounge endorsement that includes a patio (Attachment 1). La Bamba will be another Port Moody business contributing to the established Brewer’s Row on Murray Street by providing more options to visitors with the addition of spirits. La Bamba is currently going through the building permit process with the City for the improvements to the building.

The City's policy for the review of Liquor Primary Applications (Attachment 2) sets out two options for Council:

1. That the City undertake a public consultation process which includes notification to neighbouring properties, newspaper notifications, and public meetings. Council would then deliberate and determine if the City was in support of the licence based on resident response.

1 52

2. That the City "opt out" of the process.

Should the City choose to opt out of the consultation process, the LCRB ensures that the applicant still follows through with the requirements of the public consultation process as set out in section 10 of the Liquor Control and Licensing Regulations to assess whether the granting of the licence would be contrary to public interest.

Given that the LCRB has a process to ensure that a suitable and appropriate process will be followed for public consultation, and given that the location of La Bamba is in a primarily non-residential area, staff feel that it is not necessary for the City to undertake the consultation process, and are, therefore, recommending that the City opt out of the process.

Other Option(s) THAT staff be directed to proceed with the public consultation process as set out in Corporate Policy – 09-4300-2016-01 – Review of Liquor Licence Applications.

Financial Implications There are no anticipated financial implications with respect to the recommendations in this report. Should Council direct staff to proceed with the public consultation process, the applicant would be charged the fee set out in the City’s Fees Bylaw to cover the associated costs.

Communications and Civic Engagement Initiatives Based on the recommendations stated in this report, no communications or civic engagement initiatives are required.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives The recommendation outlined in this report is consistent with Council’s 2019-2022 Strategic Priority of Economic Prosperity and supports the objective of supporting the growth of businesses and business neighbourhood development.

Attachment(s) 1. Application to the LCRB. 2. Corporate Policy – 09-4300-2016-01 – City Review of Liquor Licence Applications.

Report Author Robyn MacLeod, RBO, CRBO Manager of Building, Bylaw and Licensing

2 53

Report Approval Details

Document Title: LCRB Application for La Bamba .docx

Attachments: - Attachment 2 -Corporate Policy 09-4300-2016-01.pdf - Attachment 1- LCRB La Bamba.pdf

Final Approval Date: Apr 6, 2020

This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Dorothy Shermer, Corporate Officer - Apr 3, 2020 - 5:19 PM

Rosemary Lodge, Manager of Communications and Engagement - Apr 5, 2020 - 12:39 PM

Paul Rockwood, General Manager of Finance and Technology - Apr 5, 2020 - 1:12 PM

André Boel, General Manager of Planning and Development - Apr 6, 2020 - 8:48 AM

Tim Savoie, City Manager - Apr 6, 2020 - 9:47 AM

3 54

FIPPA s. FIPPA s. 22

FIPPA s. 22 FIPPA s. 22

FIPPA s. 22

Section: Legislative and Regulatory Affairs 09 Sub-Section: Building, Bylaw, and Licensing 4300 Title: City Review of Liquor Licence Applications 2016-01

Related Policies

Number Title

Approvals

Approval Date: November 15, 2016 Resolution #: CW16/148 (RC16/398) Amended: September 19, 2017 Resolution #: RC(CW)17/031 (CW17/117) Amended: Resolution #: Amended: Resolution #:

EDMS#387081 1 62 Corporate Policy Manual City Review of Liquor Licence Applications

Policy 1. The Manager of Building, Bylaw, and Licensing shall have primary responsibility for coordinating the review of liquor licence applications and shall seek the input of the Port Moody Police Department and other City Departments as deemed appropriate.

2. Under section 40 of the Liquor Control and Licensing Act, Council delegates the authority to City staff to respond to applications referred to the City for review from the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch (LCLB) for: a. temporary changes in hours of operation; b. increases in person capacity for an existing liquor licence, other than for a liquor- primary; and c. food-primary establishments applying to add patron participation entertainment or extend hours for serving liquor beyond 12:00am.

3. City staff will advise Council of all applications referred to the City for review from the LCLB for: a. a new liquor-primary or new liquor-primary club; b. liquor-primary establishments applying to extend hours of operation, increase in person capacity, or to add a patio; c. new breweries and wineries; and d. breweries and wineries applying for a lounge endorsement.

4. Each application in section 3 shall be subject to a public consultation process except that Council may, if it so wishes, opt out of the review of an application by notifying the LCLB in writing.

5. Council may also determine that the public consultation portion of the review process for applications set out in section 3 not be undertaken upon an applicant’s written request, where Council considers that nearby residents will not be affected. In such cases, Council shall deliberate the matter as set out below and provide a resolution to the LCLB in writing either supporting or not supporting the application along with the criteria that were used as a guide in reaching a resolution.

6. Unless otherwise determined by Council, per sections 4 and 5 above, public consultation by the applicant will be required as part of the City’s consideration of an application starting with a public open house held by the applicant at a time and location considered appropriate by the City. The purpose of the public open house will be for attendees to ask questions of the applicant and for the applicant to receive feedback. At least one member of City staff shall attend a public open house as an observer.

7. The City shall deliver written notice of the application and public open house by mail or hand to all property owners and tenants within a 60-metre radius of the subject property. Notice of the public open house shall also be advertised twice in the local newspaper.

EDMS#387081 2 63 Corporate Policy Manual City Review of Liquor Licence Applications

8. Following the public open house, the application will be discussed by Council at a Regular or Special meeting of Council, the location and time of which shall be advertised at least once in the local newspaper. For that Council meeting, a staff report will be prepared summarizing and responding to the public input received addressing the regulatory criteria established by the LCLB. The staff report will also provide comments and recommendations.

9. Council shall discuss the application at the advertised meeting, at which time both the applicant and any member of the public who wishes to speak to Council on the matter may do so. Written submissions prior to or at the meeting shall also be accepted by Council.

10. Upon considering the application and input received, Council shall at the meeting provide a resolution to the LCLB in writing either supporting or not supporting the application along with the criteria that were used as a guide in reaching the resolution. Alternatively, Council may return the application to staff for further work or to seek additional information.

11. The criteria established by the LCLB that Council shall use as a guide in its consideration of applications by establishments to amend their licences include: a. the impact of noise on the community in the immediate vicinity of the establishment unless subparagraph (b) or (c) apply; b. in the case of an application that involves a temporary use area endorsement, the impact of noise on the community in the immediate vicinity of the proposed locations of event sites under corresponding temporary use area authorizations; c. in the case of an application that involves a lounge or special event area endorsement, the impact of noise on the community in the immediate vicinity of the location of the service area under the endorsement; d. general impact on the community; and e. if the application is to amend a food primary licence in relation to patron participation, extending their hours past 12:00am or adding or amending a temporary use endorsement.

12. If in processing an application, it appears that the 90-day referral deadline established by the LCLB will be exceeded, staff are authorized to request an extension from the LCLB.

Monitoring/Authority Delegated to the Manager of Building, Bylaw, and Licensing.

EDMS#387081 3 64

Date: March 17, 2020 Submitted by: Youth Focus Committee Subject: Youth Sports Award

Purpose To provide Council with information regarding a resolution passed by the Youth Focus Committee requesting the development of a Youth Sports Award.

Recommended Resolution

THAT the report dated March 17, 2020 from the Youth Focus Committee regarding Youth Sports Award be received for information.

Background At the March 11, 2020 Youth Focus Committee meeting, the Committee received a presentation from Andréa Lyons (Attachment 1) regarding the creation of a Youth Sports Award and passed following resolution:

YFC20/005 THAT the City of Port Moody consider a Youth Sports Award and that the presentation from item 4.1 be forwarded for Council consideration.

Discussion The Youth Focus Committee discussed options for how the award could be implemented and what the nomination criteria would encompass. Staff advised that a sports award is currently included in the civic awards program, but that limiting the nominee age to under 18 years would ensure that the award is presented to an individual youth or a youth team.

Other Options 1. THAT the report dated March 17, 2020 from the Youth Focus Committee regarding Youth Sports Award be referred to staff for information. 2. THAT the report dated March 17, 2020 from the Youth Focus Committee regarding Youth Sports Award be referred to staff for action.

Financial Implications Further information on financial implications would be provided by staff should this report be referred to staff for action.

1 65

Communications and Civic Engagement Initiatives Further information on communication and civic engagement requirements would be provided by staff should this report be referred to staff for action.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives Providing Council with information on the Youth Sports Award aligns with the 2019-2022 Council Strategic Plan Objectives of encourage lifelong healthy and active living.

Attachments 1. Presentation from Andréa Lyons regarding Youth Sports Award.

Report Author Jennifer Mills Committee Coordinator

2 66

Report Approval Details

Document Title: Youth Sports Award.docx

Attachments: - Attachment 1 - Youth Sports Award.pdf

Final Approval Date: Apr 3, 2020

This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Dorothy Shermer, Corporate Officer - Mar 23, 2020 - 9:45 AM

Angie Parnell, General Manager of Corporate Services - Mar 30, 2020 - 4:41 PM

Rosemary Lodge, Manager of Communications and Engagement - Mar 30, 2020 - 6:25 PM

Paul Rockwood, General Manager of Finance and Technology - Mar 31, 2020 - 9:11 AM

Tim Savoie, City Manager - Apr 3, 2020 - 9:58 AM

3 67

Port Moody Youth Sports Award

Andréa Lyons March 11, 2020 Presentation to the Port Moody Youth Focus Committee

About the Award

General • Celebrate the outstanding achievement of Port Moody Youth throughout the City. • Recognize athletes who have achieved excellence in performance sport and are regarded for their leadership qualities both on and off of the field of play. • Athletes under the age of 18. • Must live in the Port Moody area

1 68

Nomination Requirements

• Has been a permanent resident of Port Moody for the last 12 months. • Under the age of 18 • Actively participating in a recognized provincial sport that shows evidence of high athletic ability and performance results • Actively participated in a Port Moody base sport that leads to achievement(s) • Is enrolled in school and is actively pursuing or planning to pursue a post secondary education.

Nomination Process

• Nomination Form completed in full • Establish deadline for applications • Accomplishments must be within the calendar year • Late applications will not be accepted • Submitted to (TBD)

2 69

Selection Criteria

• Sport Achievements — Pursuing and achieving sport performances leading towards podium placements at provincial, national and The Award’s selection international competitions • Leadership Qualities — Demonstrating the committee will assess nominees qualities of leadership, coachability, strong work ethic, and the characteristics of fair play both on using the following four criteria: and off the field of play • Education — Demonstrating a commitment to academic studies and continued education • Future Goals — Demonstrating how their experience in sport is shaping their future

Nominees Receive

• Receive Medal/Certificate • Letter of recognition by Mayor and Council

3 70

Date: March 11, 2020 Submitted by: Planning and Development Department – Development Planning Division Subject: OCP Amendment and Rezoning – 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street (Multi-Family Residential, Bold Properties)

Purpose To present for Council consideration OCP Amendment Bylaw No. 3242, Rezoning Bylaw No. 3243 and Road Closure Bylaw No. 3244 to facilitate the redevelopment of the properties at 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street.

Recommended Resolutions

AND THAT City of Port Moody Road Closure Bylaw – 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street, 2020, No. 3244 be read a first time.

Executive Summary Bold Properties (New Barnet) LP has submitted an OCP Amendment and Rezoning Application in order to allow for a six-storey, 163-unit development on the properties located between 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street. Key aspects of the proposal include:

 two six-storey buildings over a single parkade with access from St. George Street;  an overall Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 2.4;  a mix of units from one-bedroom to three-bedroom + den suites ranging in size from 53.7m2 (578ft2) to 122.5m2 (1,318.3ft2);  92 (57%) adaptable units;

1 71

 land dedication to enable the construction of an additional northbound travel lane and multi-use pathway on Clarke Road and St. Johns Street;  improvements to the existing trail from the end of St. George Street to Moody Secondary School; and  an affordable housing approach based on BC Housing’s Affordable Home Ownership Program.

The developer is dedicating land along Clarke Road to facilitate the road improvements and the construction of the multi-use path. Site consolidation, following dedication, will involve the closure of the opened portion of St. Andrews Street, east of Clarke Road.

In order to permit the development, the following are required:

 adoption of an OCP amendment bylaw to alter the land use designation from ‘Mixed Use – Moody Centre’ to ‘Multi-Family Residential’ as the project does not incorporate commercial use;  adoption of a bylaw rezoning the site from ‘Single Detached Residential (RS1)’ to ‘Six Storey Apartment Residential Zone’ (RM8);  adoption of a road closure bylaw to enable the closure of St. Andrews Street;  adoption of a housing agreement bylaw to establish the terms and conditions relating to the management of the proposed affordable home ownership program; and  issuance of a development permit if the OCP amendment, rezoning, and road closure bylaws proceed.

Background Bold Properties (New Barnet) LP has submitted an OCP amendment and rezoning application for seven properties located at 2001-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street as shown on the Location Plan (Attachment 1). The application proposes two six-storey multi-family residential buildings consisting of 163 apartment units in a mix of unit types from studios to three-bedroom suites, over underground parking. The two buildings are arranged around the perimeter of the site enclosing an outdoor courtyard with a variety of outdoor amenities. A project fact sheet is included as Attachment 2.

Key issues that have been considered by staff during the review include: the provision of an affordable housing component; the St. Andrews Street road closure; building design improvements to create a transition to the single-family homes to the south; road improvements on Clarke Road; the provision of a multi-use pathway along Clarke Road; the Clarke Road- St. George Street intersection design; and the reconstruction of the pathway/stairs leading from the St. George Street cul-de-sac down the bank to Port Moody Senior Secondary School.

On December 3, 2019, Council considered a staff report recommending first and second readings of an OCP Amendment Bylaw and a Rezoning Bylaw to implement the project; the following motion was DEFEATED:

2 72

RC19/530 That City of Port Moody Official Community Plan, 2014, No. 2955, Amendment Bylaw No. 23, 2019, No. 3222 (2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street) be read a first time as recommended in the report dated November 13, 2019 from the Planning and Development Department – Development Planning Division regarding OCP Amendment and Rezoning Application – 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street.

This decision effectively ended the processing of the application and, under section 14.1 of the City’s Development Approval Procedures Bylaw, the project may not be brought back for reconsideration for six months.

Following the rejection of the OCP Amendment Bylaw, the applicant continued to work with BC Housing to refine an affordable home ownership program for the project to address Council’s concerns.

This item was considered by Council on February 11, 2020 and, at that time, the following motion was passed:

RC20/115 THAT the six-month requirement of the application for OCP Amendment and Rezoning for 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns street be waived;

AND THAT staff continue to work with the applicant to bring back the OCP Amendment and Rezoning application with the applicant’s proposed changes for Council’s consideration.

Discussion Site and Conditions The development site consists of seven single-family lots located between St. Johns Street and St. George Street, on the east side of Clarke Road, as shown on the Location Plan included as Attachment 1. The single-family lots are developed with the exception of the vacant lot at 2005 St. Johns Street.

The site slopes down by approximately 10.35m (34ft) from St. George Street to the northeast to St. Johns Street. The site is located at the top of a heavily-treed, steep bank that separates the site from the vacant property to the east. This bank varies in height from 12.2m (40ft) at the south end of the site to 3m (10ft) at the north end.

Surrounding development consists of:

 North: across St. Johns Street, developed three-storey multi-family buildings (RM4), which are designated Multi-Family Residential in the OCP up to a maximum of three storeys;  East: the former Barnet Hotel site (C5), now vacant, which is designated in the OCP for mixed-use development up to six storeys in height and is the subject of a current development application;

3 73

 South: Single Detached Residential (RS1) lots, which are proposed to remain Single Family Low Density under the OCP; and  West: across Clarke Road are five undeveloped properties, including one private RS1 lot and four City parcels zoned Civic Service (P1).

Official Community Plan The subject property is designated Mixed Use – Moody Centre which allows for mixed commercial/residential development up to a maximum height of six storeys. The site is also situated within the Evergreen Line Westport Sub-Area. Sub-Area Policy 15.5.1.4 anticipated that the subject lots and the adjacent vacant Barnet Hotel site would be developed based on a comprehensive site plan addressing site access, existing grades, and compatibility with surrounding uses. The Sub-Area Policy also indicated that that commercial uses would be limited to the St. Johns Street and Albert Street frontages. The site is located within Development Permit Area 1, which regulates the form and character of development in neighbourhoods, and the east portion of the site is designated as an Environmentally Sensitive Area (Development Permit Area 4) for the protection of the existing tree resource on the bank to the east.

Zoning The subject properties are currently zoned Single Detached Residential (RS1). The OCP and Zoning designation maps are included as Attachment 3.

Development Proposal Description The development proposal consists of two six-storey apartment buildings enclosing an outdoor amenity courtyard over a parking structure with access off St. George Street. Project details include:

 163 apartment units including: o 79 (48.5%) studio, one-bedroom, and one-bedroom and den units ranging from 42.9m2 (462.5ft2) to 67.8m2 (729.7ft2); o 74 (45.4%) two-bedroom and two-bedroom and den units ranging from 70.8m2 (762.3ft2) to 93.4m2 (1005.8ft2); o 10 (6.1%) three-bedroom and three-bedroom and den units ranging from 95.7m2 (1,029.8ft2) to 106m2 (1,140.8ft2); and o 92 (56.4%) adaptable units;  a total floor area of 13,851.2m2 (149,092.96ft2), which results in a Floor Area Ratio of 2.4;  217 resident parking spaces and 27 visitor spaces;  270 long- and short-term bicycle parking spaces, which satisfies the Zoning Bylaw requirement of 258 spaces;  123.6m2 (1,330.4ft2) of common indoor amenity space; and  approximately 477m2 (5,134.4ft2) of common outdoor amenity space within the central courtyard (excluding the landscaped areas), plus 252m2 (2,720ft2) of communal outdoor roof deck spaces. The total indoor and outdoor amenity areas amount to 852m2 (9,177ft2) or 5.22m2 (56.3ft2) per unit, exceeding the Zoning Bylaw requirement of 3m2 (32.3ft2) per unit.

4 74

Table 1 compares the project elements to the RM8 zoning regulations and other zoning regulations relating to parking, bicycle parking, adaptable units, and amenity area. As illustrated, the project meets and exceeds the RM8 Zone regulations with the exception of the rear (south) setback (as shown bolded in Table 1), which is 0.84m (2.76ft) short of the RM8 requirement. Staff propose that the site be rezoned to RM8 and the non-compliance be considered as a variance within the development permit if the project proceeds.

Table 1 – Zoning Comparison Zoning Regulation RM8 Zone/Other Regs. Proposal Density (FAR) 2.4 2.4 Height 21.5m (70.5ft) and 6 storeys, N. Bldg. – 17.46m (57.3ft) whichever is less and 6 storeys S. Bldg. – 18.8m (61.68ft) and 6 storeys Lot Coverage 60% 56.5% Setbacks - Front 3.0m (9.8ft) Front (North) – 5.48m (18ft) - Rear 4.5m (14.76ft) Rear (South) – 3.66m (12ft) - Side 3.0m (9.8ft) Side (East/West) – 5.45m (18ft)/3.81m (12.5ft) Parking - Resident 204 217 - Visitor 27 27 - Total 231 244 Bicycle Parking - Long- and short-term 258 270 Adaptable Units Min. 50% 57% Amenity Space 3m2 (32.3ft)/Unit 5.22m2 (56.2ft2)/unit

Project plans are included as Attachment 4.

Road Dedication and Intersection Design In accordance with the Master Transportation Plan, the developer will dedicate 571.2m2 (6,148.3ft2) of the site and reconstruct a portion of Clarke Road and St. Johns Street to include a second northbound travel lane and a multi-use pedestrian/cycling pathway along the east side of Clarke Road. The purpose of these measures is to improve traffic flow and safety, improve pedestrian safety, and to incorporate improvements to the cycling network.

The St. George Street/Clarke Road intersection will not be signalized due operational reasons due to the grade of the road. The intersection will be redesigned to include a new southbound left turn lane from Clarke Road to St. George Street but, to ensure that a potentially dangerous situation is not created, the intersection will not allow for southbound left turns from St. George Street onto Clarke Road. Traffic wishing to proceed south will travel up Seaforth Way to Seaview Drive and access Clarke Road at a new signalized intersection.

Site Consolidation In order to consolidate the site, following the road dedication, the applicant will purchase the open portion of the St. Andrews Street road allowance amounting to 766.8m2 (8,253.7ft2) which

5 75 requires a road closure bylaw. Attachment 5 illustrates the area to be dedicated and that portion of the St. Andrews Street road allowance to be closed.

Affordable Housing The original affordable home ownership program for the project initially involved three partners: Bold Properties, BC Housing, and the City of Port Moody. Affordability would be achieved by a reduced developer profit margin, the deferral of fees owing to the City, and through low-cost interim construction financing from BC Housing. The developer has since revised the affordable housing proposal to involve Bold and BC Housing only.

The thrust of the revised program is still as originally presented, to offer potential first time home owners who are currently renting, with an option to enter the housing market. However, the City is not being asked to consider any fee waivers as initially requested and as such, it is not involved as a partner. While the details of the revised program are still being developed, Bold has confirmed that there will be a locals-first marketing program, and BC Housing indicated that they would be open to responding to individual situations on an as-needed basis if units need to be vacated before the five-year residency requirement has been satisfied. Staff will continue to work with Bold and BC Housing to understand all of the program details, but some known issues which require clarity include:

 the extent of the price discount in terms of the actual percentage reduction and the number of units to which this would apply. This will ultimately be dependent upon project costs which may not be known until the building permit is issued;  details on how the BC Housing mortgage proceeds will be re-invested back into the City;  how the program will prioritize residents currently renting in Port Moody;  confirmation of the total household income range applicable to each type of unit; and  confirmation that BC Housing will manage the process of selecting eligible households.

In order to reduce project costs and improve the affordability of the project, the applicant has suggested that a reduction in the amount of parking required would reduce the extent of the underground parkade and, therefore, construction costs. At present, the project has 13 spaces more than required under the Zoning Bylaw. By eliminating these 13 spaces, maximizing the use of small car spaces and reducing the parking requirements for two-bedroom units to 1.25 spaces/unit, a variance of 21 spaces would be required. These changes affect only the underground parkade design and are not reflected in the attached parking plans. A parking demand assessment has been requested to support the proposed variance. If supported, the reduction would be authorized as a variance in the development permit.

If the OCP amendment and rezoning bylaws proceed, a housing agreement bylaw implementing the revised affordable home ownership program will be provided for Council’s consideration.

6 76

Form and Character The project is situated within Development Permit Area 1: Neighbourhood Residential and the project generally addresses the applicable design guidelines. This will be addressed in detail at the development permit stage if the required bylaws proceed. Of note, the south building has been redesigned with a significant stepped break in the upper levels in order to reduce the massing of the building and ease the transition to the single family homes across St. George Street. This break is shown on Sheet A3.0 in Attachment 4 and varies between 9.4m (31ft) at the fourth level and 23.3m (76.5ft) at the sixth level. The upper two levels have also been setback from the face of the south elevation to increase the separation from the single-family homes to the south. At a minimum, the separation between the face of the fifth and sixth levels of the building to the closest single-family home is 31.7m (104ft).

Community Planning Advisory Committee The application was reviewed by CPAC on July 2, 2019 and the following resolution was passed:

CPAC19/005 THAT CPAC provide the following comments on the proposed project as presented in the report dated June 18, 2019 from the Planning and Development Department – Development Planning Division regarding 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street:

• provide additional details on the value of the affordable housing component of the project; • explore potential partnerships for affordable housing other than with the City; • consider live/work studio spaces within the project; • consider the inclusion of curb space for ride-sharing services; • investigate whether separated multi-use paths are appropriate; • consider including rainwater capturing opportunities; • encourage the inclusion of passive energy designs; • provide motion-sensitive lighting in the corridors and parkades; • encourage the retention of existing trees (such as the mature conifers); • provide more details on the bird-friendly attributes; • consider alternative colour-schemes that fit neighbourhood context; • consider requiring replanting of native species as appropriate; and • provide revised study of anticipated traffic impact.

In terms of these issues:

 as noted previously, staff and the applicant are presently refining the details of the approach based on BC Housing’s ‘Affordable Home Ownership Program’ as discussed later in this report;  CPAC encouraged the developer to incorporate live-work units in the project, but that use is not permitted in the RM8 Zone. The RM8 Zone does allow for home occupations subject to the regulations in sections 5.2.3(a) and (b) of the Zoning Bylaw and the developer has offered to ensure that a future strata council cannot prohibit that use which may have to be implemented through a restrictive covenant as a condition of a development permit;

7 77

 the design of the improvements to St. George Street have not been approved, but there is a pull-in which would allow for a ride-sharing vehicle.

The remainder of the issues identified by CPAC are detailed design matters, which will be assessed during the on-going review of the development permit plans.

Sustainability Report Card The current Sustainability Report Card is included as Attachment 6 and the project has reached a score of 68%.

Sustainability Cultural Economic Environmental Social Overall Pillar Total

Application

2002-2014 St. George Street and 57% 100% 75% 51% 68% 2003-2009 St. ( 4 out of 7) ( 7out of 7) (43 out of 57) (18 out of 35) Johns Street

Implementation Implementation of this project requires:

 an amendment to the OCP to change the land use designation from ‘Mixed Use – Moody Centre’ to ‘Multi-Family Residential’ to reflect the fact that the project does not contain any commercial use. This site was designated as a mixed-use site with the expectation that it would be developed in conjunction with the adjacent Barnet Hotel site. As the sites are being considered separately, staff are concerned that commercial use on the subject site may not be viable due to site grades and limited vehicle access. The provision of commercial uses on the adjacent Barnet Hotel site as proposed, is more appropriate and is not impacted by the absence of commercial use on the subject site. In support of the proposed amendment to eliminate the requirement for commercial use, the applicant has provided a Letter of Opinion (Attachment 7) from a commercial brokerage firm, which indicates that the location of the site and the access challenges suggest that the site is not one that would support commercial use. To implement the land use change, OCP Amendment Bylaw, No. 3242 is included as Attachment 8;  rezoning from ‘Single Detached Residential (RS1)’ to ‘Six-Storey Apartment Residential Zone (RM8)’. Rezoning Bylaw, No. 3243 is included as Attachment 9;  closure of the opened portion of St. Andrews Street to enable the consolidation of the site. Road Closure Bylaw, No. 3244 is included as Attachment 10; and  a Housing Agreement Bylaw to implement the final affordable housing program.

If the above Bylaws proceed, a development permit will be presented to Council for consideration at the time the Bylaws are ready to be considered for Adoption.

8 78

Concluding Comments The proposed development, while requiring an OCP amendment to eliminate the requirement for commercial use, is otherwise in conformance with the six-storey built form policies established in the OCP. The development has generally addressed the applicable development permit area design guidelines to the satisfaction of staff. The Affordable Home Ownership Program will enable more buyers to enter the ownership market and potentially free up rental units in the City. Overall, this project will provide some variety of housing sizes for different segments of the market and given the proximity to transit, schools, and commercial uses on St. Johns Street, it represents a positive addition to the community. If the OCP Amendment and Rezoning Bylaws proceed, a Housing Agreement and development permit will be provided for Council’s consideration.

Other Options 1. THAT City of Port Moody Official Community Plan, 2014, No. 2955, Amendment Bylaw No. 24, 2020, No. 3242 and City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw, 2018, No. 2937, Amendment Bylaw No. 33, 2020, No. 3243 (2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street), and City of Port Moody Road Closure Bylaw, 2020, No. 3244 be given first and second readings and referred to a Public Hearing. 2. THAT the report dated March 11, 2020 from the Planning and Development Department – Development Planning Division regarding OCP Amendment and Rezoning – 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street be received for information; AND THAT the applicant be requested to update the proposal by addressing the following concerns / suggestions:

Financial Implications Community Amenity and Public Art Contributions The applicant is required to pay the Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) amount, which will be established at the development permit stage once the final residential floor area is confirmed and prior to the adoption of the OCP Amendment Bylaw, No. 3242 and Zoning Amendment Bylaw, No. 3243. Based on a gross residential floor area of 14,035m2 (151,072.8ft2), the contribution would be in the order of $900,000. Of that total, approximately $300,000 would be directed to the Affordable Housing Reserve Fund and the remaining $600,000 would go towards general community amenities.

The applicant has committed to provide a contribution to the Public Art Reserve Fund, which will be based on 0.5% of the cost of construction in accordance with the Public Art Policy. Based on a construction cost estimate of approximately $37,800,000, the contribution would be $189,000.

Communications and Civic Engagement Initiatives In accordance with the City’s Public and Stakeholder Consultation for Major Development Projects or Area Plans policy, the applicant held a Community Information Meeting on May 23, 2019 to engage the public about the proposal and solicit feedback. The meeting was attended by 24 residents and a total eight feedback responses were received. Comments received related to:

9 79

 the parking and safety impacts associated with the additional traffic on Seaforth Way;  the proposed design of the intersection of St. George Street and Clarke Road and the absence of a signalized intersection;  emergency access/egress due to the limited access off St. George Street;  a suggestion that a road connection be provided through the former Barnet Hotel site to Albert Street;  the impact of the building on views from the surrounding neighbourhood; and  the need for designated on-street service vehicle parking.

Should this rezoning application proceed to a Public Hearing, notices will be sent to adjacent properties within a 140m radius of the site and will be advertised in the local newspaper in accordance with the Development Approval Procedures Bylaw and the Local Government Act. The Public Hearing will not be scheduled until the local and regional situation stabilizes regarding COVID-19, or the Provincial Government enacts new interim legislation to address Public Hearing attendance.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives The proposal is consistent with the strategic priority of Community Evolution in the 2019-2022 Council Strategic Plan as it relates to the objective of ensuring that future community growth is carefully considered and strategically managed, consistent with the targets approved in the City’s Official Community Plan.

Attachment(s) 1. Location Plan. 2. Application Fact Sheet. 3. OCP Land Use and Zoning Designation Maps. 4. Reduced Project Plans. 5. Plan Showing Dedication and Road Closure Areas. 6. Sustainability Report Card. 7. Report from Commercial Real Estate Consultant. 8. Draft City of Port Moody Official Community Plan, 2014, No. 2955, Amendment Bylaw No. 24, 2020, No. 3242. 9. Draft City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw, 2018, No. 2937, Amendment Bylaw No. 33, 2020, No. 3243. 10. Draft City of Port Moody Road Closure Bylaw – 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street, 2020, No. 3244.

Report Author Doug Allan, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner

10 80

Report Approval Details

Document Title: OCP Amendment and Rezoning Application - 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street.docx

Attachments: - attachment 1 - Location Plan.pdf - Attachment 2 - Application Fact Sheet.pdf - Attachment 3 - OCP Land use and Zoning Designations Map.pdf - Attachment 4 - Reduced Project Plans.pdf - Attachment 5 - dedication and acquisition map.pdf - attachment 6 - sustainability report card.pdf - Attachment 7 - Report from Commercial Real Estate Consultant.pdf - Attachment 8 - Draft Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 3242.pdf - Attachment 9 - Draft Zoning Bylaw No. 3243.pdf - Attachment 10 - Draft Road Closure Bylaw No. 3244.pdf

Final Approval Date: Apr 3, 2020

This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Tracey Takahashi for Dorothy Shermer, Corporate Officer - Apr 2, 2020 - 4:37 PM

Rosemary Lodge, Manager of Communications and Engagement - Apr 2, 2020 - 4:55 PM

Paul Rockwood, General Manager of Finance and Technology - Apr 2, 2020 - 4:58 PM

André Boel, General Manager of Planning and Development - Apr 3, 2020 - 9:37 AM

Tim Savoie, City Manager - Apr 3, 2020 - 10:36 AM

11 81

LOCATION PLAN 82

ATTACHMENT 2 APPLICATION FACT SHEET

Applicant: Bold Properties (New Barnet) LP

Application No. and Type 6700-20-186 Rezoning from Single Detached Residential (RS1) to Six- Storey Apartment Residential Zone (RM8).

Project Description: A six-storey mixed-use project comprised of 163 apartment units in two buildings over underground parking.

Existing OCP Designation: Mixed Use – Moody Centre (max. six storeys).

Development Permit Development Permit Area 1: Neighbourhood Residential. Areas: Development Permit Area 4: Environmentally Sensitive Areas.

Community Information Meeting: May 23, 2019

Community Planning Advisory Committee Meeting: July 2, 2019

Proposed Development Statistics: Number of residential units 163 Density 13,851m2 (149,092.96ft2) net floor area Floor Area Ratio: 2.4 Lot Coverage 56.5% Resident Parking 217 Spaces Visitor Parking 27 Spaces Bicycle Parking 270 Long- and short-term spaces Setbacks – South South – 3.66m (12ft) – West West – 3.81m (12.5ft) – North North – 5.48m (18ft) – East East – 5.48m (18ft) Number of Studios, One-Bedroom and One- 79 42.9m2 (462.5ft2) to Bedroom + Den Units and size range 67.8m2 (729.7ft2) Number of Two-Bedroom and Two-Bedroom + 74 70.8m2 (762.3ft2) to Den Units and size range 93.4m2 (1005.8ft2) Number of Three-Bedroom and Three-Bedroom 10 95.7m2 (1,029.8ft2) to + Den Units and size range 106m2 (1140.8ft2)

ATTACHMENT 3 OCP LAND USE DESIGNATIONS

SITE

ZONING DESIGNATIONS

SITE

RCHtTECTURG Mlcbotl Cot, Arihllotl A I I C 2 2 0 ( 0 I ith Str t Ntv Woitml ttor, 1C V3UC1 PARAMOUNT lol: 1104) iOI-1 111 Clarke Road @ St. Johns Street City of Port Moody

TATISTICS CIVIC ADDRESS: FLOOR A E CALCUL TION 2002, 2006,2010, 2014 ST. GEORGE STREET NORTH BUILDING FLOOR REA (sq ft) AMENITY MINUS MENITY SPACE) 2009,2005,2003 ST. JOHNS STREET 1ST GROUND LEVEL [123] 5923.3 2ND 2 D LEVEL (133) 9931.1 612.7 3RD 3RD LEVEL (1 3) 100914 LEGAL ADDRESS: TH TH LEVEL (153) 10011.6 LOTS: 3,4,5,6,16,17 +LOT 18 5TH 5TH LEVEL (163) 9916 BOLD EXCEPT: PART RED ON P N WITH BYLAW FILED 62959, 6TH 6TH LEVEL (173) 6910.6 BLOCK 4, DISTRICT LOT 202, GROUP 1, 52785 5217 .3 PROPERTIES NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT, PLAN 55 SOUTH BUILDING FLOOR REA (sqft) AMENITY MINUS A ENITY SP CE) 1ST GROUND LEVEL (1 6) 18221.2 717.7 EXISTIN G REZONING: RSI 2ND 2ND LEVEL (156) 19301.6 PROPOSED ZONING: RM 8 3RD 3RD LEVEL (166) 18976.4 TH 4TH LEVEL (176) 17194.9 TOTAL FLOOR AREA 5T STH LEVEL (186) 13878.9 (EXISTING HOMES ON S.F.LOTS): 14,136 6TH 6TH LEVEL (196) 12045.2 98900.5 SITE AREA CALCULATION: FLOOR AREA TOTAL 151072.8 DRAWING LIST: LOT AREA (sq ft) TOTAL OF UNITS i 16*17*18 24900.79 ADAPTABLE # OF UNITS 92 A - 0.1 COVER PAGE - STATISTICS / DRAWING LIST 1893.76 ST. ANDREWS ST EET 8712.54 ALLOWABLE DEDUOID AREA (SQ.FT.) 2 SQ.M./UNIT A - 0.2 REAS CALCULATION / FSR / UNITS / COVERAGE FLOOR REA AFT R DEDUCTIONS 149179.04 .1- A • 0.3 AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT + AREA COVERAGE 3*4*5*6 34849.73 SITE A EA 62130.91 a 5 A-1.1 LOCATIO PL N TOTAL 68463.06 FS 2.40 OW ARE 6332.15 A-1.2 SITE PHOTOS PARKING REQUIRED A-1.3 SITE PLAN - SETBACKS -1- DIMENSIONS SITE AREA 62130.91 1 BED (1/UNIT) >2BED( 1.5/UNIT) TOTAL ° l A - 2.0 FLOOR PUN: LEVEL 113 - PARKING LEVEL 3 N DIDO 3B 30 88 A - 2.1 FLOOR P N: LEVEL 126/123 - N+S BLDG - PARKING LEVEL 2 S BLDG 41 95 136 A-2.2 FLOOR PUN: LEVEL 136/133-N+S BLDG-PARKING LEVEL 1 N+S BLDG 79 125 04 OVER 100 UNITS A-2.3 FLOOR PUN: LEVEL 146 S BLDG + 143N BLDG FIRST 100 UNITS S _• 1 « - 100 UNITS (0.2/ U IT) >100 UNITS (0.1 / UNIT) Frolic) lllli: A - 2.4 FLOOR PUN: LEVEL 156 S BLDG +153 N BLDG VISITORS 21 7 27 A - 2.5 FLOOR PUN: LEVEL 166 S BLDG* 163 N BLDG REQUIRED 31 A-2.6 FLOOR PUN: LEVEL 176 S BLDG 173 N BLDG PARKING PROVIDED (ALL ELECTRIC CARS) A-2.7 FLOOR PUN: LEVEL 186 SBLDG 72.1* 25.4* 2.5* A-2.8 FLOOR PUN: LEVEL 196 S BLDG STANDA D SMALL HE TOTA B 2 A - 2.9 FLOOR PUN: LEVEL 206 - N+S BLDG-ROOF VISITO S 10 1 CONSULTANT LIST ADDRESS CITY PROVINCE POSTAL PHONE CONT CT EMAIL PA KING 1 6 8 1 15 A-3.0 SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATIONS PARKING 2 73 10 3 4 of* COVER P GE ! A-3.1 NORTH* SOUTH BUILDINGS ELEVATIONS • DEVELOPER BOLD PROPERTIES INC. 600-68B WEST HASTINGS VANCOUVER BC V6B1P1 604 944 8942/140 CHARLIE KEAY [email protected] PAR ING 3 79 20 1 108 A-3.2 NORTH BUILDING ELEVATIONS • ARCHITECT GATEWAY ARCHITECTURE INC 22D-601 6TH STREET NEW WESTMINSTER BC V3L3C1 604 60B1B6B/203 MICHAEL COX [email protected] 176 62 6 [email protected] oc: - A-4.0 BUILDING SECnON: 1-1 604 608 1868/205 DAN DIACONU BICYCLES REQUIRED A-4.1 BUILDING SEQION: 2-2 • L NDSCAPE ARCHITECT PERRY AND ASSOCIATES 112 EAST BROADWAY VANCOUVER BC V5T1V9 604 73B4118 MICHAEL PATTERSON mp@perryandassocia!es.ca /UNIT VERT(X) HOR (*) LOCKERS (X) SHORTTERM TOTAL a_-C = E A-4.2 BUILDING SECnON: 3-3 604 7384118/111 K R SINGBEIL ks@perryanda550ciate5. a 15 50 30 20 94 A-4.3 BUILDING SECTION: 4- • STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BMZ STRUCTUR L ENGINEERS 700-609 WEST HASTINGS STREET VANCOUVER BC V6B4W4 604 6859533 JASON STUART [email protected] ORTH BLDG 87 4 26 10 6 • CIVIL ENGINEER BINNIE& ASSOCIATES #300 49 0 CANADA WAY BURNABY BC V5G 4H7 604 4201721 DAVID MARCHAND d [email protected] SOUTH BLDG 156 78 47 32 i 163 A-5.0 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS FROMN-E N+S TOTAL 43 1 2 73 50 1 5 A-5.1 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS FROM N-W • CODE CONSULTANT C MPHORA ENGINEERING 2479 KINGSWAY VANCOUVER BC VSR 5G8 604 8009822X1 SUSANA D. CHUI [email protected] VANCOUVER BC V6P 6P2 604 439 0922 BYRON RICHARDSON [email protected] BICYCLES PROVIDED -5.2 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS FROMS-E • GE0L0GIUL CONSULTANT GEO PACIFIC CONSULTANTS 1779 WEST 75TH AVENUE 129 V+ 76H+ 501 55 Drowlng Humber: 604 420 1721 DAVID MARCHAND [email protected] (ON LEVEL P3 AND PI) - A-5.3 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS FROMS-W • TRAFFIC BINNIE& ASSOCIATES #300 4940 UN DAWAY BURNABY BC V5G4H7 (ON COURTYARD LEVEL) = 12 = 12 V7A4V4 604 275 37B4 EXT: 102 NORMHOL nor @aclqroup.ca -5.4 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS FROM COURTYARD • ARBORIST ARBORTECH CONSULTING #145 12051 HORSESHOE WAY RICHMOND BC TOTAL 267 BC V5G4G3 604 430 0671 LIBOR MICHALAK [email protected] A-0.1 A-5.5 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS ALONG ST. GEORGE STREET • ENVIRONMENT L KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL #320 4400 DOMINION STREET BURNABY BC V3B4S4 604-464-5199 BILL PAPOVE [email protected] LOCKERS PROVIDED A-6.0 SHADOW ANALYSIS • SURVEY PAPOVE #1120 WEST OOD STREET COQUITL 1200 LYNN VALLEY ROAD NORTH VANCOUVER BC V7J2A2 604 988 2508 EXT: 153 NICK DOBBS [email protected] [ON LEVEL P3 AND P2) - 162 (1/UNIT) A-7.0 MATERIAL BOARD • ACOUSTIC BKL OBS ST :*p

tilld S | SDIlSIlViS 1! II (102 :,,l 04 eiiaiiR iiitiaat) imiifi Sijm|j i(;iaaB0] lESOd d) EiSOil f i Epooy) |ioj |o i||) Dii i nj iB.ioqiiy |iiadc|iiig (g|ggii| otiiai l snijof'ij @ pooj gyDl) < *'!"1 iinai| |- ij £010/1 1 5 i; jq il •* iNno vavd 85

NORTH BUILDING SOUTH BUILDING i ™ 31166'1 86

ARCHITECTURE Mlchoil Cox, Atilillttl A I 1 C ? 2 0 - i 0 1 ilh s m Haw Wotlmlnslar, JC V3L3C1 III: (i D 4) 0 B • I 8 6 8

BOLD PROPERTIES

N BUILDING COVERAGE 12523.4 sf

fAPE CO te3! jf -j23lA4f l1 wm-l |o U lJ

- ¦ •

ST. GEOROC STREET A-0.3 AREA COVERAGE Scale: 1/32 = T-O J 87

GAT E

LOCATION PLAN

The site is located in the West side of Port Moody, on the South-Eastern corner of the intersection of St. Johns Street and Clarice Road.

7 lots an o propose to be ecomissioned street BOLD (St. An rews Street) have been assembled together PROPERTIES for this site.

LOTS:

16, 17, 18

3, 4, 5, 6 88

2 2 0 i 0 1 6th Sltitt SITE PHOTOS

CURRENT USE Art l't « : Single family lots.

CORNER OF CLARKE RO D AND ST. JOHNS STREET- LOOKING T[

BOLD PROPERTIES

CORNER OF CL RKE ROAD AND ST. JOHNS STREET - LOOKING TOWARDS EAST

ST. ANDREWS STREET CLOSE TO C RKE ROAD - LOOKING TOWARDS EAST CLARKE ROAD AND ST. ANDREWS STREET - LOOKING TOWARDS NORTH

INTERSECTION OF ST. GEORGE STREET AND SEAFORTH WAY - LOOKING TOWARDS EAST ST. GEORGE STREET - LOOKING TOW RDS E ST ST. GEORGE STREET - LOOKING TOWARDS WEST n ua ; w if) I MOHS ST ; VS :i: l : LU It) h< 1 IUI S tsN0iSN3Wia +smvaus tl 11 iIOZ :,,l U ~ - i ijj.iiH 11111UPD3 ii iipi lEioncjp /i.'jbujuo) ItSOSI 1 N\HJ 3ilS Ota - c 1:' ItiiiiH ii!iDai>ji| iiiiiuai) ~ 1 p o o Oj |0 >| I JIS suiofis © ool m ««im jidf-Jip llit l 1 l|j. ntiiii jqoi /oini |P-»0I( llsi BOLDPROPE t iNnow avd

V < ca m B t/> -O 7 j a. -ju h- C - 89 90 91 r in «»0«5$l ri S UJ 1 iti C 4 '< * li flij • Iil.i-ai) Ipiinoi) f illil S f 9018 N113A31 i i no! :,,o Elilil |iiua ) i i!>pj tcmo|| Ji:ii«idb») US0J1 ~ Id OMVd NVld gig c i Qa! i *P»«W l « |« *1!) i|is|aq j ||Di:|li| |oiudo| i(] * lo|otii| l s «Bi|«ns © p»«j » U iii(| iiigi diy* lip 8J10/I 1 Oa: ip-ia-il mo. ; o|ii|jq /il|tl

L ST. JOHNS STREET S 2-2 IA-U)! 93

PLAN LEVEL 1 S BLDG + LEVEL 3 N BLDG

Scale: 1/1 "° I'-O"

ivlng M mbir: fr-oe-Ol r hlga/ lo nl lm PARAMOUNT 1 L i/mi -Afll 'filt I i A-2.3 (larli ItaJ @ Sl.Jalnt Sirtel 1. i lirtilil Dnilif ni'l A pLralioi Subnl lta (il|| o( Pori Hoodj ? 3. Iniokr: DID 0. I9DS3I Conn 'tf flerrliJ AJiiiuj (onnlllM K lirg lt-<: 1011 II : P N LEVEL1S BLDG f J. mm CocBiril/ llrnli| Aliiliry (tai lli|.ln|iiii flij l ' nlil : m LEVEL 3 N BLDG ! r

ST. JOHNS STREET s u r s 2.2 r™ (A .0). (A- .1l! 94

PLAN LEVEL 2 S BLDG + LEVEL 4 N BLDG

Scale: 1/16"= T-0

ST. GEORGE STREET

ir-ne-dl itilslio/ s bnliilon PARAMOUNT | 1. 179941 fit -A;;! iLi* I lii tlorlf Rcq4 © Si.Johns Sl ol 2. It lig • Diitlspniol AjfliioGo Stboi ltn - (Mr ol Poll Hoodr =r I k; DID PLAN LEVEL 2 S BLDG 3 4. I90S3I Corrjjt tj fliDBlig Adtlici) (onnillti Mitilt 2011 II 21 i S. 191121 (oeaitrtf lltt' t Ad cij Ctnrhl • liip it Fll l'l 11 n II: 131 LEVEL A BLDG =¦ «S SH0 I 95 96 97 I OBS ST V S Id :ii|«>li i| CO c liilll|-ii|p Dl) Jisi ff Ipiiaai) lillil 5 f 1(11(102 .. EgiiiiN li aai) inijipj 8tiott|j IES06I 9 2 aaias9i3A3i nto aic : ,,,,i C J QQ- li iigi gii uiO].| i|iiiuoi) • lpooH iioj jo i||) - IIl|ll|a BJ |OludC|ll!|] . B J[0 5IJ J (••iis © pD|)! » »i) mi i im |{By iij 19(0 1 1 i ! Oa ip-sai( mo. uo|ii|uqni /i;o|i|i)i ¦= iNnowvavd

Scale: 1/16 = T-O" PLAN LEVEL 6 S BLDG 98

L in UJ oaias ° Of imii y ItiiitlJ /i-iea i) Itilil Lli • .iauoj l«l«ao|j ii iNnow d

Scale: 1/16 ¦= I'-O" ROOF PLAN S BLDG 99

L 100

Mlchoil Co», Arthltitl Al I C 3 2 D - ( 0 1 (Ih Slnil ew Wiilmlntlir, DC V313CI III: |i 0 A) 6 0 8 • I B 4 8

CLARKE ROAD

BOLD PROPERTIES 101

Ulthool Cot. rckllill « I I t 2 2 0 (01 (Ih Sltool Hew Wtslmlntl.r, 1C V31 3C1 Id: [10 4) 101-1 til

BOLD PROPERTIES 102

Tor-ir rormftT

1" i,' v' ;; ft yg.

NORTH BUILDING : ELEVATION NORTH L 103

5V-OU/I6 N U OHS SV :ri"S 1 ICO 6 UIU3 ¦ • iiiij- IIII'JDS) Iltuiff lriil|J /(iji ai) 0211(1 S 1 12 11(102 :M» tiiliiH iimoag) ii5i|ipi (c|icc|j liigiaao) US04I 0 2 O i ipooH l «0 1" <113 * ((0 4) (01-10(8 iijiiliaqiij co!ii)q44TIIla4g|<,,0 0>|i>g»| l> iS soqans © f»»l tjil| «ii|0i|i4(- iij 0340/1 1 tliitiaqil /«i|qiil ip-jail iNnowviivd 1 104

KKXKaa 8 9 I I • I 0 9 (9 0 91 OHS ST :,i >S EE N0ID3S 0 a iiiiJiij - ii|,!-'U») (muff 1(|>IC|J ;uoaii) tlllil 5 12 II (102 •wo lu (ijlliH lliHQDt) Jj9t|i | 8i|»j9|j Jiigmao) S tl 9 oia qq. 6j;i h Ijinool) EiSOil £ ipooH j )0 111) - ' li in >9:i>>yKyii>>°iii|> i IIUI soijons s p»»J J I) Oa I9K/I 1 1 CQCL ip-ia-il 1 iNnowvavd 105

L °l) -St 81(0/1 1 Oa ooiis!yqas/D)|i|*ai CQQ. 1 iNnowvavd 106

I J N MOHS SI Id fe sniii Id 11 IOd ;M« _ LU liUllil Htuuo) int i y (I'j uao) USOil 1 soNiams+N giQ QQ. iiilliH i|(iaau<) EiSOfl ~ Ipoow OJ |0 d||) -IQ uoj juqnj t9i|0)i|idy |iiD c|iii(] Ig|oon] OEtlll i» i5 luijafij g poo] i Jn|) Oa: • IHII l$l):|(d|-liy llildl mo- o0{ti|uifot /iijiim ip-sa-il t INnOWVNV 107

I IMOBSST ."S LU Id :ii|»«|P*:«| H M N udJ MJIA q: ii 8i iI|J l .«aa«) 8(11(1 s i 82 II (I0Z :,-*4 lailii iiiiisoi) 8«!ouD|j ijinaao) ICSOd •( s9Nia nas*N 010 '••¦ 1 -p L QQ. ipoow |ioj |o l||) - [( 0 ) 6 0 8 - 1 1 (8 Di|ii|Qqoj to iiD ilily |oiaii|iiig Bi|oai

AE IAL VIEW FROM N-W

L N aOHS ST -,inS Id W' J ! J-S WON SM31A C J q: lilll||raal) iisiiif7 /iwaass) (211(1 $ 12 11(102 :,''0 LU lili N iliuaaj iiiaija|j l4:)aaao) ItSOd | soNia nas + N am 1 QQ. £ S0(I £ ifoo |J0j jo X||) Di|iiiB ns «j;|ci:|iXf i udiimj . I1110111 CIIII 2 iiijis s»ions a poii « »i) | <1 Oa 0(021 1 CQQ. ua|ii| j ni / Di|i| i f iNnowvavd 109

L AERIAL VIEW FROM S-W 110

uCD PARAMOUNT | 1/(901 fro • j jl ttl l ll* 5° i "jr 5 s Clorke Rood @ Sl.Johni Slriel 111130 Imolog Di hpaiil Ajpl rolioo Sobahiloo Or s • „ Cllj of Pori Hooif J I9CS/3 (lantoitp liforaotiia JO ::: 1 ° o Dimi hy: DIP I90S3I Connmi tf Plmlif Adiimj Conaillri M rltj m : r ~ J-n N + SBUILDINGS ! 191173 rlinl>| dili:i| (tnriil . Fiiprni = co I>>a: 1011 11 31 73 In 131 VIEWS FRO S-W | H ||I l S b: AS SHOWS in si s r. KMOHS ST :*i, M ICI ¦ r IWli i-tlltucn h ifl I|ii0aa»] '5 SM3IA Ga dallOj IB II BIOB IBIIBI f -i UJ Bi!lii ii uaj Bi]tcE|j /i:aniuao) UBOBI = S9Nia nas + N «» [W &: D . ii l ooM lio |o i|!) * 1 otim l ItIJIS SB OflS g pDOj » »|) Oa: m ll gl!ill|l<|-lij nso/i 1 ! 1 CQCL V0jt(|a s

COURTYARD VIEW 4 111 112

7 no. yr-nt-dl i liiio/ sibniss'oa PROPEBOLD = '- s T> PARAMOUNT 1. 118901 fit A[;l [oiiio I i | | (lorkt toa © SI.John Slnel Iti oLog Dmlif aiol ApfllcalLig SubDliiloo jll 1 n - Cltr of Foil Moo y .• (onn ily ftfoiaolloi Miitiog - S I | DID s 0. 190531 ( tnin'Jf ffooolag tdi isry tonDlllii M fiig - r s= " N + S BUILDINGS = 191129 Cirna-ily rlit:lig Adiilory (onrillii'liiyiiii Ln In: 101) II 21 VIEWS ALONG S. 7 *{: = ¦' _ r ;iit ) : o 1 ll 11: S , HC m - S it: ASS OWI ST. GEORGE STREET CO nn 113

L 114

PARAMOUNT Clarke Roa @ St. Johns Street

CEMENT BOARD BM 180-BEVERLY HILLS

MET L CCENT CEMENT BOARD GLASS BMOC 68-DIST NT GRAY VITRUM - SOLARBAN 60 OR SYM, VINYL-CHARCOAL 8M 1666-INTHE MIDNIGHT HOUR

ETAL R IUNGS CEMENT BOARD BM 2132-20-EBONY KING BM1 13-SILENT NIGHT

ENTRANCE DOOR 8 WINDOW FRAMES CEMENT BOARD LUMINUM-CHARCOAL BM 1636-PROVIDENCE BLUE 115

L illIff! » 116

ST.JOHNS STREET

ST. GEORGE STR ET 117 P-t-A 118

ST. GEORGE P+A 119 V+d 120 Hr!|i„ n m ?s

C Ji 121

I i

¦5 2 S hzri 1 Jfe a. b b § © 122

L5.1 1 i 1 ii! J3 *w s 1 s s ? si 1 I01 !*! 1 Q fc 0) A L5.2 1 a. i il!l i i ! 1 §O a c I o 3 i !i|l! CD i t f P+A iiiii!l 1 l 1 J 2

! | ;

123 |

!ii!l "'I| i i«il I 124

P-i-A

North Building Private Patio Amenity Patio

Private Patio

0°o / Childrens Play

Building E it Lounge

Family Picnic fi Area - ,

Amenity Courtyard P 342 m2 ¦Fire Pit and'. Social Space 1 luuc torCdm wrJtr mi.TBro BBQ and PljnniTjAddiory Community Conreltaa Unang Bicycle Parking) Table _

BOLD PROPERTIES

PARAMOUNT

Paramount i'South Building Amenity Courtyard ; A enit Patio 51 m* Private Patio Private Patio «

Private Patio 13S 1SCS2 LSK1.0 125

DEDICATION AND ACQUISITION MAP

126 Multi-Family Sustainability Report Card Purpose

The Sustainability Report Card recognizes that developers, builders, designers, and others proposing changes to the built environment have an important role in creating a sustainable community. Sustainability involves stewardship of land and environmental resources, as well as green building and a focuson design elements that bring people together and help communities flourisheconomically, socially, and culturally. Port Moody encourages innovative thinking in community design to achieve a more sustainable community.

To this end, the Report Card is a requirement for rezoning, development permit, and heritage alteration permit applications. The Report Card identifies performance measures based on community sustainability values: these measures are used to evaluate development proposals. The Report Card is intended to be a summary of overall project sustainability. It is a tool to be integrated with all other development approval requirements. Process

There are six steps to followin completing the Sustainability Report Card process:

1. Make a development inquiry to Development Services regarding your proposed rezoning, development permit, or heritage alteration permit. Staffwill provide you with a hard copy of the Sustainability Report Card and provide a weblink to portmoody.ca/SRC where you can finda fillable PDF version of the Report Card.

2. Attend a pre-application meeting with City staffto discuss your proposal. The Planner will determine if the Sustainability Report Card is a document that must be submitted with your application.

3. If required, complete a Report Card by fillingin the appropriate informationthat applies to your particular application and submit the completed Report Card (saved version of online fillable PDF or hard copy) to the appropriate City staff( sustainabilityreportcard@ portmoody.ca or deliver to City Hall Planning Department at 100 Newport Drive), along with a completed land use application.

4. The Planner will review the Report Card for completeness and accuracy and forwardto staffin various departments for feedback. The Planner will determine your preliminary score and discuss the results of the staffreview with you. You will then have an opportunity to improve your score with respect to the sustainability of your proposal and resubmit an updated Report Card.

5. The Planner will make comments, determine your final score, and prepare the Project Report Card Summary. The Summary will be included in the land use reports that are distributed to the Advisory Design Panel, Community Planning Advisory Committee, and Council.

6. If your application is approved by Council, your final Report Card is maintained in the development fileand a copy is provided to the City's Building Division. Instructions

• Your Report Card must contain sufficientdetail to ensure each measure can be evaluated. To do this, make reference to the appropriate plans, drawings, and reports that demonstrate how the performance measure is met.

• The relevance of the questions will depend on the nature and scope of your project, so not all questions will be applicable to all projects.

• Some measures are marked 'EARLY STAGE'.This indicates that these measures must be considered in the design phase as it is unlikely they can be added to a proposal later on.

Italicized words are in the Glossary at the back of this document.

PORT------MOODY CITY OF THE ARTS 127

• Similarly, some measures are marked 'BASELINE'. Although the Report Card is not a pass or failtest of development applications, it does set a minimum score to indicate the City's minimum expectations. Items labelled 'BASELINE' count toward a minimum score as they are considered to be low cost and readily achievable.

• Italicized terms are definedin the Glossary at the end of the Report Card document.

• Refer to the Resources section forlinks to Internet resources relevant to measures in the Report Card. Scoring

• Performancemeasures are assigned weighted scores from 1 to 10 to indicate their significance based on: (1) level of difficultyto integrate into project design; (2) order-of-magnitude cost added to the project; (3) degree of effectiveness for increasing the overall project sustainability; (4) identified community priority in the Official Community Plan; and (5) level of urgency for Port Moody in terms of achieving community sustainability goals.

• City staffscore the completed Report Card based on the principle of best achievable on each site foreach performancemeasure. Where possible, points forachieving various means are indicated. In other cases, the number of means to achieve a performance measure may exceed the total points possible foran item. In this case, the Planner will make a fairassessment of the project's performance forthis measure with respect to the conditions of the site as a percentage and translate this to the possible score.

• Only whole number scores will be assigned. This will be achieved by rounding to the nearest whole number. For example, if overall performancefor a measure is deemed to be about 80 per cent and the possible score is out of 4, then a score of 3 points out of 4 will be assigned.

• The Report Card is an iterative process with the applicant. The applicant has an opportunity to comment and make changes to their proposal beforethe scores are considered finaland shared with public advisory bodies and Council.

• Additional space is provided forthe applicant to address innovations and constraints not captured elsewhere in the Report Card. These items are not scored, but are given specificmention on the Project Report Card Summary.

• Staffwill review your completed Report Card and provide feedback beforeyour project is scored to give you the opportunity to achieve the highest score possible. Monitoring

In general, the informationrequired from the applicant for the Sustainability Report Card is similar to the kind of information required fora typical development application. However, to ensure accountability, you can expect the City to request additional information, such as: photos of installed systems or products, design drawings, professional reports, copies of receipts, or other records that can be used to verifythe implementation of the selected sustainability measures. We encourage you to provide as much informationas possible to assist City staffin their review of your development proposal. Public Information

The public may request a review of any completed Report Card related to a development application. Copies of the Report Card are maintained by the Planning Division. The Development Services Department makes Report Cards available followingcompletion of the project. Property and Applicant Information

Applicant Telephone Email BP (New Barnet) LP 604.944.8942 [email protected]

Registered Owner Project Address BOLD PROPERTIES (NEW BARNET) � 2002, 2006, 2010, 2014 St. George St & 2003, 2005, 2009 St. Johns St

Proposed Use Multi-family residential

14 192 2 Total Floorspace 1�-·-----�1 m City of Port Moody 2 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will the128 project contribute to Port Moody'sstatus as 'City of the Arts'? Arts Performance Measure Description and Scoring

Cl Project includes public art in publicly accessible or publicly owned space (3 points,+ 1 bonus point if a Public Art Consultant is used). OR Project provides an in lieu financialcontribution to the City's Public Art Reserve Fund (3 points).

See links in Resources under "Examples of Good Public Art''. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

If yes, describe: StaffComments Project provides an in lieu financial contribution to the City's Public Art Reserve Fund.

Public Art Consultant:

Plan reference:

Bonus Score D11 Score �/3

CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will the p_rojectcontribute to Port Moodl'_'sstatus as 'Citl'_oi the Arts'? Arts Performance Measure Description and Scoring

c2 Project supports Port Moody's desire to be a "City of the Arts" by integrating artistic design into the site or building formor functionality (2 points). Examples: • Creative stormwater management features. • Creative interaction of the project with the public. • Artistic panels in entry foyer. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Describe: StaffComments an artisitc use of colour on the building forms to highlight the response does not address intent of the measure composition of architectural elements

Plan reference:

Score@=J12

City of Port Moody 3 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential 129 CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will the project contribute to Port Moody'sstatus as 'City of the Arts'? Heritage Performance Measure Description and Scoring

c3 Project includes reusing an existing heritage structure with heritage value through heritage restorationor heritage rehabilitation (4 points). Where the preservation of a heritage structure in its original location cannot be accommodated, this may include re-location.

See Standardsand Guidelines for the Conservation of HistoricPlaces in Canada: historicolaces.ca Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Describe: StaffComments N/A

Plan reference:

Score IN/A 114

CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will the project contribute to Port Moody'sstatus as 'City of the Arts'? Heritage Performance Measure Description and Scoring

c4 Project includes a statement of significance prepared by a heritage conservation specialist where potential heritage value is observed (2 points). Where warranted, project includes a heritage conservation plan prepared by a heritage conservation professional (+2 bonus points, where applicable).

See Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada: historicplaces.ca Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Report title: StaffComments N/A the existing homes have no identifiable heritage elements

Heritage Consultant:

Bonus Score 012 Score IN/A !12

City of Port Moody 4 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will the130 project contribute to Port Moody'sstatus as 'City of the Arts'? Heritage Performance Measure Description and Scoring

Project salvages materials or artefactsfrom a historic place, or reuses materials or artefacts from architectural/landscape salvage CS character-definingelements. in a manner which supports the authenticity of the site's Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Details: StaffComments N/A The site is not situated in a heritage character or heritage conservation area

Plan reference:

Score IN/A 113

CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will the .P_rojectcontribute to Port Mood1.'sstatus as 'Cit)'_oi the Arts'? Arts Performance Measure Description and Scoring

c6 Project designates space forthe arts or creative enterprise to be retained forthe lifetime of the project. Ex. artist studio, gallery space, dance studio, indoor/outdoor theatre, live-work units, plaza, etc. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports StaffComments 2 2 0 0 meters / eet feet the project is a residential-only multi-family building Description of space: N/A

Score IN/A !14

City of Port Moody 5 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will the131 project contribute to Port Moody'sstatus as 'City of the Arts'? Complete Community Elements Performance Measure Description and Scoring streetscape C7 Project improves the beyond minimum City requirements by integrating lasting creative elements and demonstrating effortto optimize the project's beautification impact. Examples: • Restores the frontage of an existing building in Historic Moody Centre. • Proposes artistic paving treatments in the public realm. • Adds creativity to functional elements of the streetscape. • Benches, bike rack, planter, lighting, etc. upgrades. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Details: StaffComments As a result of this project the Clarke Road and St. Johns Street opportunities to add an artistic element to the frontages will be redesigned to provide for a safer vehicular, public sidewalks can be investigated with pedestrian and cyclist environment. This will be accommodated Engineering through the DP process through the widening of the vehicular intersection and the provision of a treed boulevard and a multipurpose trail adjacent to the road and the project. Layered plantings along the street frontages will provide a colourful layered landscape providing interest through the seasons.

Plan reference:

Score@=]12

CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will thep_roject contribute to Port Mood 'sstatus as 'Cit oi the Arts'? Heritage Performance Measure Description and Scoring

CS Project will apply to be added to the City's Heritage Register. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports StaffComments

Qves QNo @NIA

Details: N/A

Score IN/A 113

City of Port Moody 6 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will the132 project contribute to Port Moody'sstatus as 'City of the Arts'? Innovation Performance Measure Description and Scoring

C9 Cultural sustainability aspects not captured above. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports StaffComments

CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will the ro ·ect contribute to Port Mood 'sstatus as 'Cit o the Arts'? Constraints Performance Measure Description and Scoring

ClO Unique site aspects that limit cultural sustainability achievement. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports StaffComments Text

Cultural Sustainability Score Summary Score

Total Cultural Pillar Points (Total Points Available - Not Including Bonus Points)

123 Total Total Cultural Points Not Applicable 16 (Total Points for Items Not Relevant to this Application) 1 n/a Maximum Achievable Score (Total Cultural Pillar Points Minus Total Cultural Points Not Applicable) 17 Maximum Cultural Pillar Minimum Score (Sum of Applicable Baseline Items) 13Cultural Baseline Total Points Achieved (Total Points Achieved forApplicable Items forthis Application) 14Total Cultural Points Cultural Pillar Score (Total Points Achieved/Maximum Achievable Score) D1D EJ% Total Cultural Max Percent Points

City of Port Moody 7 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will the133 project contribute to a strongerlocal economy? Land Use/Employment Performance Measure Description and Scoring

ECl Supports walking to shops and services by improving the circulation and connectivity of the site to the retail shops and services of the relevant neighbourhood centre. See Map 1: Overall Land Use in the City'sOfficial Community Plan: Map 7: OverallLand Use Plan Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Existing: StaffComments

Use(s): in addition to constructing the improvements to 6 single family homes, 1 vacant lot. Clarke Road including improved cycling infrastructure, the applicant will reconstruct the existing trail connection from St. George Street to Port Moody Secondary

Number of jobs on-site relating to this use in operation: 0

Proposed:

Use(s): 163 condominium homes.

Number of jobs estimate:

Assumptions:

Score �/3

ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will the project contribute to a stronger local economy? Land Use Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EC2 Provides more intensive use of land to the allowable housing density that supports local businesses. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Describe the diversificationand how it is appropriate to this StaffComments particular location: The project proposes 163 homes, current use accommodates 6 homes. Local businesses of Moody Centre are within walking distance and are accessible via public transit.

Score EJ11

City of Port Moody 8 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will the134 project contribute to a strongerlocal economy? Land Use/Employment Performance Measure Description and Scoring EC3 Results in net increase in the City's property tax base. See Map 1: Overall Land Use in the City'sOfficial Community Plan: Mao I: Overall Land Use Plan Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Existing: StaffComments Building type: Single-detached residential

FSR: 0.13

Proposed: Building type: 163 condominium homes

FSR: 2.40

Score �/3

ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will the project contribute to a stronger local economy? Land Use Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EC4 Project redevelops and rehabilitates a brownfield site. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports Describe: StaffComments The proposed new housing will support existing and proposed The applicant's response is more suited to EC3 future businesses by adding demand for local goods and measure above. services. Rezoning to a higher density significantly increases the tax base. The development site is not a brownfield site.

Score IN/A 113

City of Port Moody 9 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will the135 project contribute to a strongerlocal economy? Innovation Performance Measure Description and Scoring

ECS Economic sustainability aspects not captured above. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports StaffComments

ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How will the project contribute to a strongerlocal economy? Constraints Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EC6 Unique site aspects that limit economic sustainability achievement. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports StaffComments

Economic Sustainability Score Summary Score

Total Economic Pillar Points (Total Points Available - Not Including Bonus Points)

Total Total Economic Points Not Applicable (Total Points for Items Not Relevant to this Application) n/a Maximum Achievable Score (Total Economic Pillar Points Minus Total Economic Points Not Applicable) Maximum Economic Pillar Minimum Score (Sum of Applicable Baseline Items) Economic Baseline Total Points Achieved (Total Points Achieved forApplicable Items forthis Application) Total Economic Points Economic Pillar Score (Total Points Achieved/Maximum Achievable Score) D1D �% Total Max Percent Economic Points

City of Port Moody 10 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential 136

ESA 8 - West Chineside Forest ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well137 does theproject minimize the demands on the environment? Site Context I Ecology Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN2 Project provides bird-friendly development through landscaping that provides habitat to native species and building design that reduces bird collisions. See Va ncouver Bird Strategy Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

List all elements that reduce the impact that urbanization has on birds for StaffComments th is project: Landscape plans include areas for habitat and food sources for birds and insects (through berries and pollen / nectar sources). Riparian area of creeks will retain setbacks and the ESA No.a will be revegetated to provide habitat and berries for birds in the area. Site will incorporate the Vancouver Bird Strategy "For the Birds Bird Friendly Tips!." It will incorporate where possible the Strategy's "Bird Friendly Design Guidelines - Considerations for Development Permit".

Score Li13

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does the project minimize the demands on the environment? Site Context I Ecology Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN3 Design of outdoor lighting minimizes the harmful effectsof light pollution with technology that ensures lighting is: • Only on when needed • Only lights the area that needs it • No brighter than necessary • Minimizes blue light emissions • Fully shielded (pointing downward) See International Dark Sky Association forDar k Sky Friendly Lighting. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Describe the lighting plan forthe site and its dark sky friendly features: StaffComments Landscape lighting would be kept minimal, but sufficient to provide for safety and wayfinding. All fixtures would be full cut-off style to focus lighting and minimize spill-over or glare from fixtures.

Score Li13

City of Port Moody 12 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well138 does theproject minimize the demands on the environment? Site I Air Quality - Alternative Transportation Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN4 Project provides alternative transportation facilitiesfor user groups of each land use type, which contributes to reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from this development. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Check all that apply: StaffComments The project complies with the bicycle parking and ..f Short-Term Bicycle parking ! I EV parking requirements in the Zoning Bylaw. ! ..fI Long-Term Bicycle parking D End-of-Trip Bicycle Facilities:

D Bike share and assigned parking D Co-op vehicle and assigned parking space provision 1 ! ..fI Electric Vehicle plug-ins and designated spaces Plan references: Drawing Set / Landscape Plans

Score Li13

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITYSECTION How well does the project minimize the demands on the environment? Site I Air Quality - Alternative Transportation Performance Measure Description and Scoring

ENS Project incorporates measures to support pedestrians and cyclists. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Check all that apply: StaffComments ! ..fI Connects to existing pedestrian/cycling routes and priority destinations ! ..f! improves local pedestrian routes, local bike networks/trails ! ..fI Safe, secure, accessible, and sustainable footpaths ! ..fI Pedestrian clearway sufficient to accommodate pedestrian flow ! ..fI Covered outdoor waiting areas, overhangs, or awnings ! ..fI Pedestrian scale lighting D Pedestrian/bike-only zones

O other:

Site circulation plan:

Other plan references: Drawing Set / Landscape Plans

Score �/3

1 See BC Hydro's Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Deployment Guidelines.

City of Port Moody 13 Sustainability Report Card - Multi- Family Residential ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well139 does theproject minimize the demands on the environment? Building I Waste Storage Space Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN6 Project allocates sufficient and accessible recycling and garbage storage space in multi-family and commercial buildings and complexes compatible with City of Port Moody recycling, green waste, and garbage services. Ta rget 1: Metro Va ncouver's Technical Specifications for Recycling and Garbage Amenities in Multi-family and Commercial Developments. Target 2: Design provides safe and universally accessible access in a secure common area. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports Total residential recycling, garbage, and green waste space proposed: StaffComments

2 Recycling: Lim To be confirmed at building permit stage 2 Garbage: D m 2 Green Waste: D m Total commercial recycling, garbage, and green waste space proposed: No commercial component in project

2 Recycling: D m 2 Garbage: D m 2 Green Waste: D m

Details regarding design for safety, security, and accessibility: Space for recycling, waste and organics storage has been allocat ed based on the recommendations of Waste Control Services Inc. See letter and drawing attached to submission. the 79m2 room a ccomodates all 3 types D Score Li12

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does the project minimize the demands on the environment? Site I Sustainable Landscaping - Urban Forestry Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN7 Project protects and enhances the urban fo rest, prioritizing native tree species. See Cityof Port Moody Tree Protection Bylaw Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports Check all that apply: StaffComments D) ! ,t! Existing mature trees protected (# D Replacement tree ratio ( D : 1) • Native tree species planted on site (# EJ)

• Native tree species planted offsite (# EJ)

D Protected/natural park areas added on site (% of total site area: D %)

Arborist report: Please see Arborist Report from Arbortech Consulting and ESA Pie D Score �/3

City of Port Moody 14 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well140 does theproject minimize the demands on the environment? Site I Sustainable Landscaping - Habitat Performance Measure Description and Scoring

ENS Project preserves, enhances, and/or compensates for site ecology on site (4 points). Off-site compensation may be considered in some cases, in accordance with all other City regulations and supported by staff(3 points). Compensation in the formof a financialcontribution to the City toward approved public restoration, rehabilitation, or enhancement projects may be considered (2 points). See City ofPort Moody Naturescape Policy 13-6410-03. See also Invasive Plant Council of BC Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports Check all that apply: StaffComments

! ./! salvage replanting 2 D Reduction to existing impervious area D m

! ./! Removal of invasive plant species

Names: SA 8 and neighbouring perimeter areas will be enhanced through native tree and shrub plantings. All invasives at the Site and surrounding immediate environs will be eliminated of invasive species and revegetated with natives.

! ./! Native/"naturescape" landscaping

Owatercourse daylighting

! ./! Riparian area restoration

! ./! Other measures taken to enhance habitat or to compensate for habitat loss: Many of the plant species selected foruse on site are native plants to the region.

Score Li14

City of Port Moody 15 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well141 does theproject minimize the demands on the environment? Site I Sustainable Landscaping - Stormwater Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN9 Project provides forstormwater retention and evaporation, and groundwater protection in the site stormwater management plan. Targets: 1. Stormwater retained on-site to the same level of annual volume allowable under pre-development conditions. 2. Maximum allowable annual run-offvolume is no more than 50% of the total average annual rainfall depth. 3. Remove 80% of total suspended solids based on the post-development imperviousness. (3 points if all three targets are achieved)

See link in References to Metro Vancouver'sStorm water Source Control Guidelines Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Staff Comments Target(s)reached: 1------.....,---___.,------1 Actual target achieved will be determined at the Means of achieving (check all that apply): building permit stage but based on available information, one point is given ! ./ !Absorbent landscape ! ./ I Roof downspout disconnection ! ./ ! infiltrationswales and/or trenches

! ./ ! sub-surfacechambers/detention tanks

! ./ ! Rain gardens with native plantings

D Rainwater harvesting

! ./ !Tree well structures

D Green roof/wall

! ./ !water quality structures

D Pervious paving

O oaylighted streams

O constructed wetlands

! ./ ! other: Native species use fordevelopment

References to plans and documents: Refer to environmental planting plans, landscape, and civil plans

Score EJ/3

City of Port Moody 16 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well142 does theproject minimize the demands on the environment? Site I Sustainable Landscaping - Water Conservation Performance Measure Description and Scoring

ENl O Project reduces potable water use for irrigation. 2 points = 5 actions (from "check all that apply" list) 1 point = 3 actions (from "check all that apply" list) Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports Check all that apply: StaffComments ,t ! I Drought-tolerant landscaping (xeriscaping) with native species ,t ! I Low-maintenance lawn alternatives ! ,t! Non-water dependent materials/features for ground cover treatment

D irrigation system with central control and rain sensors

O captured rainwater irrigation system, e.g. using cisterns/rain barrels

O other:

Plan reference: Refer to environmental planting plans, landscape plans

Score EJ12

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does the project minimize the demands on the environment? Site Context I Ecology Performance Measure Description and Scoring

ENl 1 Project is sited and designed in order to facilitateand improve wildlife movement and access, particularly within known and suspected habitat corridors. Ex. Deer, bears, frogs, salmon, etc. (depending on site location). Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Species supported: StaffComments Various native common species and tailed-frog along with salmon

Means of supporting: Native plantings along ESA No. 8 and the riparian corridors. Fencing restricting access to ESA No. 8 and creeks.

Environmental assessment or site plan reference: Keystone Environmental Ltd. Environmental Overview Report

Score Li12

City of Port Moody 17 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well143 does theproject minimize the demands on the environment? Building I Green Building Rating Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN12 Project will achieve a recognized industry standard for sustainable design. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports StaffComments ./!B uilt Green Level: Gold equivalent1I ! I Applicant seeking formal BuiltGreen certification • Bronze (2 points) • Silver (5 points) Covenant required as condition of development • Gold (8 points) permit to ensure performance. • Platinum (10 points) DLEED Level: �1 ---�I • Certified (2 points) • Silver (5 points) • Gold (8 points) • Platinum (10 points) Ocanadian Passive House Institute (10 points) Ouving Future Institute

• Living Building Certification (10 points)

• Petal Certification (1 0 points)

• Net Zero Energy Certification (10 points)

Oother:

Score Li110

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does the project minimize the demands on the environment? Building I Alternative/Renewable Energy Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN13 Project provides local, low-carbon energy systems, such as geo-exchange, heat recovery ventilation, solar or district energy. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Details: StaffComments Project will provide heat recovery ventilation. amount of energy generated will be confirmed at building permit stage

Specify % of energy generated: TBD

City of Port Moody 18 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well144 does theproject minimize the demands on the environment? Building I Energy Reduction and Indoor Climate Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN14 Building architecture employs passive design strategies appropriate to the local climate to reduce energy use and enhance occupant comfort. Examples: • Site design and building massing minimizes east and west exposures to avoid unwanted solar gains. • Limit windows to 50% of any fac;:ade,taking into account other livability and aesthetic criteria. • Use heat-recovery ventilation during heating season only, and design for natural ventilation and cooling by natural ventilation throughout the rest of the year. • See City of Vancouver Passive Design Toolkit for Large Buildings for other examples. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports StaffComments

Key passive design building elements: Buildings are linear in the east/west direction which reduces the e ast and west facades. windows are generally limited to 50% of fac ade area. HRV's will be incorporated.

Score EJ;3

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does the project minimize the demands on the environment? Smart Te chnology Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN15 Project uses smart technology to optimize sustainable use of resources. Ex. Automated lighting, shading, HVAC,energy/water consumption, security, etc. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Details: StaffComments LED Lighting, Energy Star appliances, programmable thermostats, Heat Recovery Ventilation.

Score Ll12

City of Port Moody 19 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well145 does theproject minimize the demands on the environment? Site I Sustainable Landscaping Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN16 Project provides or designates space forgrowing foodin private or common areas including on-site composting to support the gardening activities. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Details: StaffComments Each home has a private balcony that could accommodate a planter box for growing food.

Landscape Plan Reference:

Score EJ12

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does the project minimize the demands on the environment? Building Energy Performance Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN17 Building design incorporates Port Moody Building Energy Performance Design Guidelines. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

BC Energy Step Code: StaffComments Details will be provided at the building permit stage @Tier 1 (1 point)

QTier 2 (2 points)

QTier 3 (3 points)

QTier 4 (4 points)

Attach a copyof Port Moody Building Energy Performance Design Guidelines Checklist.

Score EJ/4

City of Port Moody 20 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well146 does theproject minimize the demands on the environment? Stormwater and Ecology /Water Conservation Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN18 Project incorporates landscaped roofs or living walls that also provide food/habitat for native species. OR

Project includes on-site grey water reuse. 2 BONUS POINTS EACH Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Details: StaffComments Low maintenance planting is included in the landscape design. neither target measure is included

Bonus Score @=]12

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does the project minimize the demands on the environment? Environmental Monitoring Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN19 Project contracts with an Environmental Monitor(s) to oversee implementation of environmental sustainability measures, i.e. sustainable landscaping measures. OR

Project employs an energy efficiencyconsultant. 2 BONUS POINTS EACH Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Details of Work Overseen/Contribution: StaffComments RP.Bio. from Keystone Environmental Ltd. will be Environmental Monitor for the duration of the Site construction period in accordance with a prepared Environmental Management Plan guidelines.

Bonus Score Li12

City of Port Moody 21 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well147 does theproject minimize the demands on the environment? Innovation Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN20 Environmental sustainability aspects not captured above. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports StaffComments

ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does the project minimize the demands on the environment? Constraints Performance Measure Description and Scoring

EN21 Unique site aspects that limit environmental sustainability achievement. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports StaffComments

Environmental Sustainability Score Summary Score

Total Environmental Pillar Points (Total Points Available - Not Including Bonus Points)

Total Total Environmental Points Not Applicable (Total Points for Items Not Relevant to this Application) n/a Maximum Achievable Score (Total Environmental Pillar Points Minus Total Environmental Points Not Applicable) Maximum Environmental Pillar Minimum Score

(Sum of Applicable Baseline Items) Enviro Baseline

Total Points Achieved 143 I (Total Points Achieved forApplicable Items forthis Application) Total Environmental Points Environmental Pillar Score EJ% {Total Points Achieved/Maximum Achievable Score) 4� l 11 5: I ota I ax I Percent Environmental Points

City of Port Moody 22 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does148 theproject address community health and wellness? Accessibility Performance Measure Description and Scoring

Sl For single-storey units in multi-family residential development: (a) a minimum of 40% are adaptable units (2 points) and, of those units, (b) accessible unit(s) providing full wheelchair accessibility are provided (2 points). Project incorporates adaptable and accessible design features in the site/building circulation and bathrooms in all other uses (2 points). Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports Residential StaffComments

6 % of Adaptable Units: I 5 % I Details: Building access and circulation, including access to all Dwelling Units, accessible and visitor parking, common amenity areas, and common washroom and laundry facilities, are designed and built in accordance with the Adaptable Housing standards in the British Columbia Building Code

92 adaptable units provided.

Number of Accessible Units: D

Details:

Residential Site/Common Areas and Commercial/Industrial/ Institutional Uses:

Details:

Score Lit6

City of Port Moody 23 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does149 theproject address community health and wellness? Complete Community Design Performance Measure Description and Scoring

S2 Project design is adapted to minimize shadow or privacy impacts to adjacent buildings. AND/OR viewscape Project design integrates the results of a study with respect to water and mountain views. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Details: StaffComments Shadow study has been provided to demonstrate the design's limited impact on neighbouring buildings, and no impact on buildings beyond the immediate vicinity of the development.

Plan/document references:

Score EJ11

SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does the project address community health and wellness? Housing Diversity Performance Measure Description and Scoring

S3 Development includes a mix of housing types. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Number of Units StaffComments The ground level units have exterior access to Live-work units D grade. Ground-oriented units EJ Apartment units EJ

Score Li13

City of Port Moody 24 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does150 the project address community health and wellness? Housing Diversity Performance Measure Description and Scoring

S4 Project includes a range of unit sizes fora variety of household types, and the design is flexible to allow forchanges, i.e. den can easily become another bedroom. Targets: 2-bedroom minimum 25% of units 3-bedroom minimum 10% of units Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Number of Units %of Units StaffCo mments Bachelor/1-bedroom EJ � 2-bedroom EJ �(l pt) 3+ -bedroom EJ D(2 pts) Flexible design features: 52 units (32%) are 1 bed + den and 45 (27%) are 2 bed + den. Dens provide excellent opportunities for home offices and storage, allowing for greater flexibility of living spaces.

Score EJ/3

SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION--- How well does the project address community health and wellness? Housing Affordability Performance Measure Description and Scoring

SS Project provides new purpose-built market rental housing (2 points) or affordable market rental housing (3 points) or non-market rental housing (4 points). OR

Development contributes to the City's Affordable Housing Reserve Fund in lieu of provision of affordablehousing (2 points). Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Types: In lieu contribution to Affordable Housing Reserve Fund StaffCo mments

Description:

The project will contribute to the Affordable Housin!

% of total housing units: 0 %

Plan reference:

Score LJ/4

City of Port Moody 25 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does151 theproject address community health and wellness? Amenities Performance Measure Description and Scoring

S6 Project provides voluntary public amenities. Examples: · Child care facility • Space for growing food • Child play areas • Gathering place/space • Park/greenspace • Public contribution in lieu (CACs), i.e., school, library, arts, etc. (5 Points = any approved option) Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Details: StaffComments CAC contribution in lieu No public facilities are included in the project.

Plan reference:

Score@=]/s

City of Port Moody 26 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does152 theproject address community health and wellness? Amenities Performance Measure Description and Scoring

S7 Project provides voluntary private amenities. Examples: • Accessible green roof • Communal garden • Dog runs • Play areas • Social gathering place (1 point per approved amenity item - maximum of 3 points) Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Details: StaffComments - Children's play area - Communal BBQ and seating area - Communal lounge seating

Plan reference: landscape plans

Score �/3

SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does the project address community health and wellness? Inclusive Community Performance Measure Description and Scoring

S8 The proposal supports aging-in-place with adult care, assisted living space, and/or independent senior living space. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Details: StaffComments The project supports aging-in-place with the provision of over 50% No specific seniors care or independent seniors adaptable units units are provided but the adaptable units will support aging-in-place.

Score Li14

City of Port Moody 27 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential 153 SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION---- How well does theproject address community health and wellness? Community Building Performance Measure Description and Scoring

S9 Project provides urban vitalizationby involving land owners and occupants, community groups, and end user groups who may be affectedby the proposal in the planning process to identifyand showcase Port Moody's unique assets, i.e. goes above and beyond standard notificationand consultation. Examples: • Host a community-building workshop with the neighbourhood at the time of a project's inception to determine values and identifyunique assets to leverage through design. Staffwill advise on notificationrequirements and appropriate stakeholder consultation Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Please identifystakeholders and explain their involvement: StaffComments Consultation with community stakeholders will be undertaken The applicant's response addresses the City's during the course of the application review process. Input will be process requirement fora Community Information sought from local resident groups. Meeting but community input has not been obtained outside of this requirement.

Identifyactions taken in response to stakeholder input:

Plan references:

Score @=]14

City of Port Moody 28 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does154 theproject address community health and wellness? Safety Performance Measure Description and Scoring

Sl0 The design of the site incorporates Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design principles (CPTED). Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Please explain: StaffComments Public and private areas will be provided with appropriate lighting. The project provides ample 'overlook' to all central courtyard areas.

Plan references:

Score EJ11

SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does the project address community health and wellness? Education and Awareness Performance Measure Description and Scoring

S 11 Project provides education and awareness of the sustainable features of the project forowners/occupants. Examples: • Document is given to new owners at time of sale, covenant on title, inclusion/protection of features in strata bylaws • Signage/display/art recognizing design, etc. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports

Describe: StaffComments Homeowners manual will be provided to each purchaser and will include details on the design and sustainability feature.

Score EJ11

City of Port Moody 29 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does155 theproject address community health and wellness? Innovation Performance Measure Description and Scoring

Sl 2 Social sustainability aspects not captured above. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports StaffComments

SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY SECTION How well does the project address community health and wellness? Constraints Performance Measure Description and Scoring

S 13 Unique site aspects that limit social sustainability achievement. Applicant Explanation and Reference to Plans, Drawings, and Reports StaffComments

Social Sustainability Score Summary Score

Total Social Pillar Points (Total Points Available - Not Including Bonus Points)

Total Total Social Points Not Applicable (Total Points for Items Not Relevant to this Application) n/a Maximum Achievable Score (Total Social Pillar Points Minus Total Social Points Not Applicable) Maximum Social Pillar Minimum Score (Sum of Applicable Baseline Items) Social Baseline Total Points Achieved (Total Points Achieved forApplicable Items forthis Application) Total Social Points Social Pillar Score �;EJ EJ% {Total Points Achieved/Maximum Achievable Score) Total Social Max Percent Points

City of Port Moody 30 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential 156 Project Report Card Summary FOR CITY USE ONLY-TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE PLANNER

Projea Address/Name, I PROJECT SCORE SUMMARY Cultural Economic Environmental Social

Total Pillar Points Available 23 10 61 35 Cultural na Economic na Enviro na Social na Sum Of Items Not Applicable 16 3 0 0 Maximum Cultural Achievable Maximum Economic Achievable Maximum Enviro Achievable Maximum Social Achievable Maximum Achievable Score 7 7 57 35 (Total Pillar Points - Sum of Items N/ A) Minimum Cultural Score Minimum Economic Score Minimum Enviro Score Minimum Social Score Minimum Score 3 7 30 5 (Sum of Applicable Baseline Items) Missed Cultural Points Missed Economic Points Missed EnviroPoints Missed Social Points Missed Points 3 0 14 17 (Sum of Applicable Items Not Achieved) TOTAL PILLAR SCORE ACHIEVED EJ;EJ �;EJ (Total Points Achieved out of TotalD1 Cultural # PossibleD Cultural # TotalD1 Economic # PossibleD Economic # Total Enviro # Possible Enviro # Total Social # Possible Social # Applicable Items) EJ% �% EJ% EJ% Total Cultural Percent Total Economic Percent Total Enviro Percent Total Social Percent

OVERALL SUSTAINABILITY SCORE �% (Sum of Four Pillars) O� t

SUSTAINABILITY HIGHLIGHTS Cultural Economic Environ mental Social

+Cultural + Economic + Environmental + Social + 23) Priority Items (Score Achieved Project will add to Protects high value provision of and Confirmed Innovations the City's tax base ESA (tree resource) adaptable units and provide additional support project addresses Affordable Home for local businesses on-site and off-site Ownership Program pedestrian measures provision of on-site social spaces building energy performance

-Cultural -Economic - Environmental - Social 23) Priority Items (Score Missed Potential points lost and ConfirmedConstraints as the site has no heritage values

City of Port Moody 31 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential 157

Report Card Glossary

Accessible housing - Housing designed and constructed to be universally accessible to people of diverse ages and abilities.

Adaptable unit - A dwelling unit that provides flexible design features that meet BC Building Code minimum requirements; it can be adapted to meet the changing needs of any occupant for reasons of disability, lack of stamina, and progressing through differentlife stages to support independent living.

Accessible housing/unit - Housing with fixeddesign features to enable independent living for persons with disabilities, such as those in wheelchairs.

Affordable market housing - Housing that is affordableto moderate income households achieved through tenure, location, reduced parking, modesty in unit size, level of finishing, and design and durability over time as the buildings age.

BC Energy Step Code - BC Energy Step Code is a voluntary roadmap that establishes progressive performance targets (i.e., steps) that support market transformationfrom the current energy-efficiency requirements in the BC Building Code to net zero energy ready buildings.

Beautification- The process of making visual improvements appropriate to a specificplace, including but not limited to building facades, landscaping, decorative or historic-style street elements, selection of paving/fencing materials and their treatment, etc. Improvements contribute to Port Moody's reputation as City of the Arts in a sustainable manner.

Brownfield- A term used in urban planning to describe land previously used for industrial purposes or some commercial uses where the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of the property may be complicated by the potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant.

Car/Bike share network - Arrangements between two or more persons to share the use of a vehicle or bicycle fora specified cost and period of time.

Character-defining elements - The materials, forms, location, spatial configurations, uses, and cultural associations or meanings that contribute to the heritage value of a historic place, which must be retained to preserve its heritage value.

Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) - The design and effectiveuse of the built environment to reduce the incidence of crime and improve the quality of life.

District energy systems - A system that uses renewable energy to pipe energy to buildings within a specifiedarea forspace heating, hot water, and air conditioning.

Ecological inventory - An inventory that identifiesthe ecological values in a natural habitat, and is usually the firststep in an environmental impact assessment.

Electric vehicle (EV) - An automobile that uses one or more electric motors or traction motors for propulsion. An electric vehicle may be powered through a collector system by electricity from off-vehicle sources, or may be self-contained with a battery or generator to convert fuel to electricity.

Environmentally Sensitive Areas - Land designated as areas that need special protection because of its environmental attributes, such as rare ecosystems, habitats for species at risk and areas that are easily disturbed by human activities. Refer to Map 13 of OCP.

City of Port Moody 32 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential 158

Report Card Glossary - continued

Greenfield- Undeveloped land in a city or rural area either used foragriculture or landscape design, or left to evolve naturally. These areas of land are usually agricultural or amenity properties being considered forurban development.

Greyfield - Economically obsolescent, out-dated, declining, and/or underutilized land, oftenwith the presence of abundant surface parking.

Greywater - Wastewater from lavatories, showers, sinks, and washing machines that do not contain foodwastes and that can be reused forpurposes such as irrigation or flushing toilets.

Habitat corridor - Habitat areas, generally consisting of native vegetation, linking with larger areas of similar wildlife habitat. Corridors are critical for the maintenance of ecological processes, providing food, and allowing for the movement of animals and the continuation of viable populations.

Heat island effect- Heat islands formas vegetation is replaced by hard surfaces to accommodate growing populations. These surfaces absorb, rather than reflect, the sun's heat, causing surface temperatures and overall ambient temperatures to rise.

Heritage rehabilitation - The action or process of making possible a continuing or compatible contemporary use of a historic place through repair, alterations, and/or additions while protecting its heritage value.

Heritage restoration - Returning a historic place back to how it looked at any time in its past.

Invasive plant species - An invasive plant is a non-native species whose interaction causes economic harm, harm to human health, and/or environmental harm.

Light pollution - Brightening of the night sky caused by street lights and other man-made sources, which has a disruptive effecton natural cycles and inhibits the observation of stars and planets.

Market rental housing - Private, market rental rate housing units.

Naturescape planting - Landscaping with species that are naturally adapted to local climate, soils, predators, pollinators, and disease and, once established, require minimal maintenance.

Non-market rental housing - Subsidized rental housing forthose unable to pay market-level rents including, but not limited to, public housing owned and operated by government agencies, non-profithousing owned and operated by public and private non-profitgroups, and co-operative housing owned and managed by co-operative associations of the residents.

On-site power generation - The ability to generate power without transporting it from its source to where it can be utilized.

On-site renewable energy generation - The generation of naturally replenished sources of energy, such as solar, wind power, falling water, and geothermal energy.

Passive design - An approach to building design that uses the building architecture to minimize energy consumption and improve thermal comfort.

Public space - A social space that is generally open and accessible to people.

City of Port Moody 33 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential 159

Report Card Glossary - continued

R-2000-Certified New Home - Best-in-class, energy-efficienthomes with even higher levels of energy efficiencythan ENERGY STAR-qualifiednew homes, as well as clean air and environmental features.

Smart technology - Technologies that allow sensors, databases, and/or wireless access to collaboratively sense, adapt to, and provide forusers within the environment.

Statement of significance- The first essential step in any conservation project, which involves identifyingand describing the character-definingelements ; it is important in definingthe overall heritage value of the historic place. Refer to the Standards and Guidelines forthe Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (see Resources glossary).

Streetscape - The visual elements of a street, including the road, adjoining buildings, sidewalks, street furniture, trees, and open spaces that combine to formthe street's character.

Storm water management plan - The management of water occurring as a result of development or precipitation that flows over the surfaceinto a sewer system.

Transit oriented development (TOD) - A mixed-use residential and commercial area designed to maximize access to public transportation; it oftenincorporates features to encourage transit ridership. A TOD neighbourhood typically has a centre with a transit station or stop (train station, metro station, tram stop, or bus stop), surrounded by relatively high-density development with progressively lower-density development spreading outward from the centre. TODs generally are located within a radius of 400 to 800 metres from a transit stop, as this is considered to be an appropriate distance for walkability.

Universal access - This term refers to broad-spectrum ideas meant to produce buildings, products, and environments that are inherently accessible to both people without disabilities and people with disabilities.

Urban infill-A n urban planning term that refers to new development that is sited on vacant or undeveloped land within an existing community, and that is enclosed by other types of development.

Urban forest - The total collection of trees and associated plants growing in a city or town. It includes trees in parks and yards, along roadways and paths, and in other areas, both on public and private lands.

Urban vitalization - The urban planning process of rehabilitating a place or "taking a place to a higher level" using a community-building process (early stage community involvement) to define the key characteristics that make a place unique or special; and applying the concepts of urban conservation to leverage a community's assets, most oftenin accordance with approved City plans.

Viewscape - The natural and built environment that is visible from a viewing point.

Walkability - The extent to which the built environment is friendly to the presence of people living, shopping, visiting, enjoying, or spending time in an area; improvements in walkability lead to health, economic, and environmental benefits.

Xeriscaping - This terms refers to landscaping and gardening in ways that reduce or eliminate the need forsupplemental water from irrigation. Xeriscaping refers to a method of landscape design that minimizes water use.

City of Port Moody 34 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential 160

Resources

Access Near Aquatic Areas: A Guide to Sensitive Planning, Design and Management atfiles.org

BC Climate Exchange bcclimateexchange.ca

BC Energy Step Code Technical Requirements bclaws.ca

Best Management Practices for Amphibians and Reptiles in Urban and Rural Environments in British Columbia env.gov.bc.ca

Bird-Friendly Development Guidelines - City of Toronto toronto.ca/lightsout/guidelines

Canada Green Building Council cagbc.org

City of Port Moody: Official Community Plan (2014) port moody.ca

Stream and Drainage System Protection Bylaw No. 2470 port moody.ca

City of Port Moody Waste Management Bylaw No. 2822 port moody.ca

City of Vancouver Passive Design Toolkit for Large Buildings vancouver.ca

Community Green Ways Linking Communities to Country and People to Nature evergreen.ca

Design Centre for CPTED (Crime Prevention ThroughEnvir onmental Design) designcentreforcpted.org

Develop with Care: Environmental Guidelines for Urban and Rural Land Development in British Columbia env.gov.bc.ca/wld/documents/bmp/devwithcare/

EnerGuide Rating System nrcan.gc.ca/energy/efficiency/housing/new-homes/5035

Environmentally Sensitive Areas, Best Practices env.gov.bc.ca

City of Port Moody 35 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential 161

Resources - continued

Examples of Good Public Art City of Port Moody Public Art

Fatal Light Awareness Program (FLAP) flap.org

Invasive Species Council of Metro Vancouver iscmv.ca

International Dark Sky Association darksky.org

Metro Vancouver's DLC Waste Management Toolkit metrova ncouver.org

Metro Vancouver Technical Specificationsfor Recycling and Garbage Amenities in Multi-family and Commercial Developments metrova ncouver.org/services

Metro Vancouver's Stormwater Source Control Guideline metrova ncouver.org/services

Naturescape BC naturescapebc.ca

Project for Public Spaces .QillQ[9 Riparian Areas Regulation Assessment Methods gov.be.ca

Standards and Best Management Practices for lnstream Works env.gov.bc.ca

Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada historicplaces.ca

Stream Stewardship: A Guide for Planners and Developers steward sh ipcentrebc.ca

Translink: Transit Oriented Communities translink.ca/transit-oriented-communities

Vancouver Bird Strategy - City of Vancouver (2015) vancouver.ca

City of Port Moody 36 Sustainability Report Card - Multi-Family Residential 162

Colliers INTERNATIONAL

June 18th, 2019 Colliers international 200 Granville Street, 19th Floor Jane Koh, MCIP RPP Vancouver, BC V6C 2R6 Vice President, Development Bold Properties

Dear Jane,

Re: 2002-2014 Saint George Street and 2003-2009 Saint Johns Street - Letter of Opinion

Colliers International Consulting has assessed the commercial potential of Bold Properties' site located at 2002- 2014 Saint George Street and 2003-2009 Saint Johns Street (Subject Site), as identified below. The goal of this letter is to examine the Subject Site's viability for ground floor commercial use based on traditional commercial development principles strongly correlated with performance metrics and a healthy mixed-use environment. 163

Colliers INTERNATIONAL

Planning Considerations

The Subject Site is located within the Westport TRGREBj Evergreen Sub-Area, as outlined in the Port Moody Official Community Plan. This western entrance to Port Moody is envisioned as a gateway to the City, balancing

the existing residential character and function with new STREET opportunities for locally serving commercial uses, as well as more diverse housing options. SPRING

Future development goals of this area include work-live STREET space, public arts presentation space, seniors accommodation, assisted living accommodation, high tech mixed employment space, enhanced green space, HOPE new parks, and commercial/retail services.

The site itself is currently designated as Mixed-Use Moody Centre, intended for the development of a variety of retail, service, office, and stand-alone commercial activities, along with multi-family residential. As outlined below, Colliers has examined the difficulties the site possesses in terms of its commercial development potential.

Accessibility

Accessibility by vehicle, public transportation, foot, and.bicycle is one of the most important factors when examining a site's potential for commercial use. The Subject Site's location at the corner of Clarke Road and Saint Johns street creates significant limitations in terms of accessibility. Due to the physical characteristics of the corner, the site is difficult to access by vehicle with limited (if any) options for streetfront parking, access, or egress. It is also relatively far away from the Port Moody Skytrain station, and pedestrian access is hindered by the lack of available crossings across Clarke Road.

Gradation

The majority of commercial tenants strongly prefer level sites to maintain consistent frontages, strong lines of sight, and simple access. Additionally, a large proportion of the population that would access the site by foot is located downhill, and as such, the slope may deter some of these consumers from venturing up to the Subject Site. This slope is likely to be a major deterrent for any prospective tenants and could result in a longer than expected leasing period, an undesired tenant mix, and poorly performing commercial tenants.

Population

Commercial performance is dependent on a nearby population with the potential for future growth, providing a constant source of expenditures that could be captured on-site. For example, a full-sized grocery store requires a minimum trade area population of approximately 20,000. Currently, the Subject Site has a population of approximately 3,000 within a 10-minute walk, and 7,000 within a 1 km radius with limited growth between census periods.

Critical Mass it is also essential to locate commercial uses within areas containing an existing critical mass of complementary tenants and residential population rather than in isolated regions. Within Port Moody, the centre of gravity in terms of commercial supply is located to the east, closer to Port Moody Station, Inlet Centre Station, Suter Brook Village,

2 164

Colliers INTERNATIONAL

and Newport Village. These areas are known as Port Moody's commercial destinations and attract more footfall than the area near the Subject Site.

Work-Live

Although the Subject Site is located within a region of Port Moody that desires the inclusion of work-live units, the proposed RMS zoning does not permit such use. The following uses are permitted within this zone:

) Principal Use - Apartment ) Secondary Use - Home Occupation, Type A Community care

Throughout Port Moody, the zones that do permit work-live units are the following:

) C2 - Neighbourhood Commercial ) C3 - General Commercial ) C6 - Adaptive Commercial ) CRM1 - Four-Storey Mixed Use ) CRM2 - Six-Storey Mixed Use

Summary

The Subject Site has significant challenges in terms of its viability for commercial development, and it is Colliers opinion that it would be better suited for residential uses. Due to these challenges, a comprehensive market analysis is not required at this point, as the locational characteristics alone make commercial use problematic.

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions regarding the analysis above.

Yours truly,

COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL CONSULTING

Gordon Easton Russell Whitehead Managing Director Retail Consultant (604)662-2642 (604) 661-0857 Gordon.EastonOcolliers.com Russell.Whiteheadfacolliers.com 165

Bylaw No. 3242

A Bylaw to amend City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2014, No. 2955 (2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street).

The Council of the City of Port Moody enacts as follows:

1. Citation

1.1 This Bylaw may be cited as City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2014, No. 2955, Amendment Bylaw No. 24, 2020, No. 3242 (2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street).

2. Amendments

2.1 The Official Community Plan Overall Land Use Plan – Map 1 (Schedule A to this Bylaw) of Schedule “A” of City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw 2014, No. 2955 is amended by changing the land use designation of the properties at 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street from “Mixed Use – Moody Centre” to “Multi-Family Residential” as shown on the Detail Map attached as Schedule B to this Bylaw.

3. Attachments and Schedules

3.1 The following schedules are attached to and form part of this Bylaw:

 Schedule A – Map 1 – Overall Land Use Plan  Schedule B – Detail Map

4. Severability

4.1 If a portion of this Bylaw is found invalid by a court, it will be severed and the remainder of the Bylaw will remain in effect.

Read a first time this day of , 2020. Read a second time this day of , 2020. Public Hearing this day of , 2020. Read a third time this day of , 2020. Adopted this day of , 2020.

EDMS#495301 1 166

R. Vagramov D. Shermer Mayor Corporate Officer

I hereby certify that the above is a true copy of Bylaw No. 3242 of the City of Port Moody.

D. Shermer Corporate Officer

Official Community Plan Bylaw 2014, No. 2955, Amendment Bylaw No. 24, 2020, No. 3242 (2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street) EDMS#495301 2 167 Schedule A – Map 1 – Overall Land Use Plan

Official Community Plan Bylaw 2014, No. 2955, Amendment Bylaw No. 24, 2020, No. 3242 (2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street) EDMS#495301 3 168 Schedule B – Detail Map

This is a certified true copy of the map referred to in section 2 of City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2014, No. 2955, Amendment Bylaw No. 24, 2020, No. 3242 (2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street).

______Corporate Officer

Official Community Plan Bylaw 2014, No. 2955, Amendment Bylaw No. 24, 2020, No. 3242 (2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street) EDMS#495301 4 169

Bylaw No. 3243

A Bylaw to amend City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw, 2018, No. 2937 to facilitate the development of a six-storey multi-family residential project.

The Council of the City of Port Moody enacts as follows: 1. Citation

1.1 This Bylaw may be cited as City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw, 2018, No. 2937, Amendment Bylaw No. 33, 2020, No. 3243 (2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street) (RM8). 2. Amendments

2.1 City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw, 2018, No. 2937 is amended by rezoning the following lands from Single Detached Residential (RS1) to Six-Storey Apartment Residential Zone (RM8):

LOT 3, BLOCK 4, DISTRICT LOT 202, GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 55;

PID: 002-088-967;

LOT 4, BLOCK 4, DISTRICT LOT 202, GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 55;

PID: 001-739-255;

LOT 5, BLOCK 4, DISTRICT LOT 202, GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 55;

PID: 011-459-395;

LOT 6, BLOCK 4, DISTRICT LOT 202, GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 55;

PID: 011-459-417;

LOT 16, BLOCK 4, DISTRICT LOT 202, GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 55;

PID: 011-459-433;

EDMS#495303 1 170 LOT 17, BLOCK 4, DISTRICT LOT 202, GROUP 1 NEW WESMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 55;

PID: 011-459-450; AND

LOT 18, EXCEPT: PART RED ON PLAN WITH BYLAW FILED 62959, BLOCK 4, DISTRICT LOT 202, GROUP 1 NEW WESTMINSTER DISTRICT PLAN 55;

PID: 011-459-492

as shown on the attached map. 3. Attachments and Schedules

3.1 The following schedule is attached to and forms part of this Bylaw:

 Schedule A – Location Map. 4. Severability

4.1 If a portion of this Bylaw is found invalid by a court, it will be severed and the remainder of the Bylaw will remain in effect.

Read a first time this day of , 2020. Read a second time this day of , 2020. Public Hearing this day of , 2020. Read a third time this day of , 2020. Adopted this day of , 2020.

R. Vagramov D. Shermer Mayor Corporate Officer

I hereby certify that the above is a true copy of Bylaw No. 3243 of the City of Port Moody.

D. Shermer Corporate Officer

Zoning Bylaw, 2018, No. 2937, Amendment Bylaw No. 33, 2020, No. 3243 (2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street) (RM8) EDMS#495303 2 171 Schedule A – Location Map

This is a certified true copy of the map referred to in section 2 of City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw, 2018, No. 2937, Amendment Bylaw No. 33, 2020, No. 3243 (2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street) (RM8).

______Corporate Officer

Zoning Bylaw, 2018, No. 2937, Amendment Bylaw No. 33, 2020, No. 3243 (2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street) (RM8) EDMS#495303 3 172

Bylaw No. 3244

A Bylaw to close a portion of St. Andrews Street.

WHEREAS pursuant to s. 40 of the Community Charter, Council may adopt a bylaw to close a portion of a highway to traffic and remove its dedication as highway;

AND WHEREAS notice of adoption of this Bylaw has been published in a newspaper for two consecutive weeks prior to adoption and Council has provided an opportunity for persons who consider they are affected to make presentations to Council;

NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Port Moody enacts as follows:

1. Citation

1.1 This Bylaw may be cited as City of Port Moody Road Closure Bylaw – 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street, 2020, No. 3244.

2. Legal Description

2.1 That the 766.8m2 area shown in heavy black outline and identified as Parcel A on Reference Plan EPP 98216 dedicated as road on Plan 55, Block 4, District Lot 202, Group 1, New Westminster District, a copy of which is attached hereto as Schedule A and forms a part of this Bylaw, is hereby stopped up and closed to traffic of all kinds and the dedication as road is removed.

3. Authorization

3.1 The Mayor and Corporate Officer are hereby authorized to execute all documentation necessary to give effect to the provisions of this Bylaw, including the plan attached hereto.

4. Attachments and Schedules

4.1 The following schedule is attached to and forms part of this Bylaw:

 Schedule A – Reference Plan EPP 98216.

5. Severability

5.1 If a portion of this Bylaw is found invalid by a court, it will be severed and the remainder of the Bylaw will remain in effect.

EDMS#495305 1 173

Read a first time this day of , 2020. Read a second time this day of , 2020. Read a third time this day of , 2020. Adopted this day of , 2020.

R. Vagramov D. Shermer Mayor Corporate Officer

I hereby certify that the above is a true copy of Bylaw No. 3244 of the City of Port Moody.

D. Shermer Corporate Officer

Road Closure Bylaw - 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street, 2020, No. 3244 EDMS#495305 2 174 Schedule A – Reference Plan EPP 98216

Road Closure Bylaw - 2002-2014 St. George Street and 2003-2009 St. Johns Street, 2020, No. 3244 EDMS#495305 3 175

From: Marianne Gagnon [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: February-26-20 2:42 PM To: Robert Vagramov Subject: Proclamation Request - Melanoma Awareness Month

Dear Mayor Vagramov,

Please find attached a letter requesting that the month of May be proclaimed 'Melanoma Awareness Month' in your municipality to support the prevention and early detection of skin cancer, the most common form of cancer in Canada.

For your convenience, we are also attaching a draft proclamation.

Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Marianne Gagnon Communications and Programs Coordinator

SAVE YOUR SKIN FOUNDATION E: [email protected] M: 250-256-6561 W: saveyourskin.ca

176

City of Port Moody 100 Newport Dr Port Moody, BC V3H 5C3

Dear Mayor Vagramov and Council,

As May marks both Melanoma Awareness Month and the beginning of summer, it is imperative that communities across Canada be reminded of the importance of sun safety at this time of the year. In order to keep your citizens aware, informed, and vigilant about the potential risks of over-exposure to UV radiation, we ask that you, as a mayoral body, publicly proclaim May as Melanoma Awareness Month in your municipality.

Over-exposure to UV radiation is one of the major causes of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers. Though skin cancers should be largely preventable, their diagnosis rates are increasing. Skin cancer is the most common of all cancers. 1 in 6 Canadians born in the 1990s will get skin cancer in their lifetimes. There are more new cases of skin cancer each year than the number of breast, prostate, lung and colon cancers COMBINED. While most forms of non- melanoma skin cancer can be surgically removed, melanoma is an aggressive form of cancer. The five-year relative survival rate of melanoma that has metastasized is 18%.

Despite these figures, many people seek sun without taking the advisable precautionary measures, or believe that only severe burns contribute to one’s risk of skin cancer. In fact, any darkening of skin colour, including a tan, is indicative of UV damage.

Mayor of New Westminster, Jonathan Coté, has committed to proclaim May 2020 as Melanoma Awareness Month, and challenges other BC municipalities to follow his example and promote sun safety, skin cancer awareness, and early detection information among their populations. “Skin cancers are largely preventable, and yet there are more cases now than ever. This is why as Mayor of New Westminster, I’m happy to support this important initiative and challenge all BC municipalities to do the same.”

If you choose to do so, Save Your Skin Foundation will provide you with an online resource package providing information on these matters and a certificate recognizing your municipality’s efforts.

Save Your Skin Foundation is a Canadian non-profit registered charity founded by North Vancouver resident and melanoma survivor Kathleen Barnard. It is dedicated to the fight against non-melanoma skin cancers, melanoma and ocular melanoma through nationwide education, advocacy, and awareness initiatives like this one.

Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to working with you.

Sincerely,

Kathleen Barnard, Founder and President Save Your Skin Foundation

319 - 3600 WINDCREST DRIVE, NORTH VANCOUVER, B.C. V7G 2S5 | WWW.SAVEYOURSKIN.CA | [email protected] 177

“MELANOMA AWARENESS MONTH”

WHEREAS It is imperative that communities across Canada be reminded of the importance of sun safety;

AND WHEREAS Over-exposure to UV radiation is one of the major causes of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers;

AND WHEREAS Skin cancer is the most common of all cancers. 1 in 6 Canadians born in the 1990s will get skin cancer in their lifetimes;

AND WHEREAS Many people seek sun without taking the advisable precautionary measures and are unaware that any darkening of skin colour, including a tan, is indicative of UV damage;

AND WHEREAS Skin self-examinations should be performed on a monthly basis because skin cancers are highly treatable when detected early;

AND WHEREAS Save Your Skin Foundation is dedicated to the fight against non- melanoma skin cancers, melanoma and ocular melanoma through nationwide education, advocacy, and awareness initiatives:

NOW, THEREFORE the month of May 2020 will hereby be proclaimed as

MELANOMA AWARENESS MONTH 178

CITY OF PORT MOODY

WHEREAS it is imperative that communities across Canada be reminded of the importance of sun safety;

AND WHEREAS over-exposure to UV radiation is one of the major causes of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers;

AND WHEREAS skin cancer is the most common of all cancers. 1 in 6 Canadians born in the 1990s will get skin cancer in their lifetimes;

AND WHEREAS many people seek sun without taking the advisable precautionary measures and are unaware that any darkening of skin colour, including a tan, is indicative of UV damage;

AND WHEREAS skin self-examinations should be performed on a monthly basis because skin cancers are highly treatable when detected early;

AND WHEREAS Save your Skin Foundation is dedicated to the fight against non-melanoma skin cancers, melanoma, and ocular melanoma through nationwide education, advocacy, and awareness initiatives;

NOW, THEREFORE the Council of the City of Port Moody does hereby declare the month of May, 2020 as

“MELANOMA AWARENESS MONTH”

Dated this 14th day of April, 2020 DRAFT 179

From: Carly Geistlinger [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: March‐09‐20 12:09 PM To: Council Subject: 2020 Neighbourhood House Week Proclamation Request

Good afternoon,

The Association of Neighbourhood Houses of BC (ANHBC) and Sasamat Outdoor Centre (SOC) would like to request a Neighbourhood House Week proclamation from the City of Port Moody for the week of May 3‐9, 2020.

Neighbourhood House Week, taking place May 3‐9, is an initiative to celebrate the important role and impact of neighbourhood houses in the community.

ANHBC is made up of 8 neighbourhood houses throughout the Lower Mainland as well as Sasamat Outdoor Centre (SOC) in Belcarra/Port Moody. SOC is ANHBC's hub for organized camping programs and, since its inception in 1986, has been instrumental in enriching lives through learning and playing in the outdoors. SOC offers a wide variety of camp programs and leadership programs and also provides much needed facility rentals. SOC is also a community leader in school outdoor education, including hosting a diverse range of community activities in its unique site on Sasamat Lake. SOC's programs offer something for everyone and are inclusive, age appropriate, and designed for progressive learning. The programs reflect SOC's firm belief that quality camping and outdoor experiences can be a key factor in an individual's personal development.

Neighbourhood House Week Proclamations will not only be displayed in the neighbourhood houses/outdoor camp, their websites and social media sites, but will also be printed on large foam core boards to be displayed at the Good Neighbours Awards taking place on May 7 in Vancouver. The Good Neighbours Awards is an annual event hosted by ANHBC for all the neighbourhood houses in the lower mainland. ANHBC owes its long‐standing history to its many volunteers (over 1,750 volunteers donated approx. 100,000 hours each year). The Good Neighbours Awards offer an opportunity for staff, clients, and volunteers to come together to celebrate and honour those volunteers who have made significant and long‐lasting contributions to our neighbourhood houses/outdoor camp and communities.

Attached please find our proclamation request package. Please let me know if you need any further details from us.

Thank you.

Carly Geistlinger, MSW (pronouns: she/her/hers) Operations Manager ANHBC – Central Services 203 - 3102 Main Street, Vancouver, BC V5T 3G7 T: 604-875-9111 X 106 | F: 604-875-1256 E: [email protected] | W: www.anhbc.org

180 Engage. Connect. Belong.

A Neighbourhood House has something for everyone, at every stage.

14 NHs oﬀer 400+ programs and activities

158 103 152 Children Programs Youth Programs Family Programs

107 137 105 Adult Programs Senior Programs Community Programs

83% Increased their knowledge of neighbourhood issues. 3 in 4 Said they improved their ability to work with people from diﬀerent backgrounds.

A Neighbourhood House can help you:

Forge Friendships Feel at Home in Your Neighbourhood

Develop Skills Change Your Community

60% Made at least one close friend through their Neighbourhood House. 3 in 4 Of those born outside Canada said their ability to speak in front of others improved.

Learn more about the Neighbourhood House in your community.

visit yournh.ca

Research by Neighbourhood Houses in Metro Vancouver (NHiMV) 181

Neighbourhood Houses in Metro Vancouver www.nhvproject.ca

THE HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF NEIGHBOURHOOD HOUSES BY ELEANOR J. STEBNER

Funded by SSHRC (Grant No: 435-2012-1276), the NHiMV project explores the contributions of neighbourhood houses to local communities. Neighbourhood houses have a long history of operation in Vancouver, dating back to 1938. They began as part of the Settlement House Movement made famous in North America by Jane Addams and her work at Hull House. While time and distance have created differences to that early model, the houses remain neighbourhood- based, locally governed, multi-service, community development oriented organizations. Visit www.nhvproject.ca for more information.

The fourteen neighbourhood houses (NHs) in the municipalities of Vancouver, North Vancouver, Burnaby, and Surrey, though different in size and each uniquely embodying its particular community, offer programs and services for people of all ages, races, and interests. They are grounded in the conviction of individual and community empowerment through social interactions, volunteer service, mutual support, and learning from one another. As Helen Hart, an early 20th century leader of the NH movement in both Canada and the United States, said, such houses are not charity: “it is not a case of one set of people giving something that another set receives, it is a pooling by all of us of the best we know how to share. It is a living and sharing of life.”

Overview NHs in Metro-Vancouver date to the 1938 The first NH in the United States opened in opening of Alexandra NH in the 1886 in New York City, and the first in Canada neighbourhood of Kitsilano. It was formed out opened in 1899 in Toronto. NHs provided an of the resources of a women’s and children’s early and significant professional outlet for hospital founded in 1891 and an orphanage women to work and live independently. that opened in 1892, which was incorporated Indeed, women provided invaluable as the Alexandra Non-Sectarian Children’s leadership although they are often overlooked Home in 1894. NHs are thereby linked to the earliest of social organizations founded in part because of scarce historical records on following the passage of the provincial 1891 many of them. The profession of social work Benevolent Societies Act, which allowed for and the academic discipline of applied the formation of societies, clubs, and other sociology largely emerged from this organizations to unite in activities seeking the movement. common good. Most of Canada’s early NHs were started Metro-Vancouver’s NHs are part of an before World War I in places like Toronto, international movement that began in East Montreal, and Winnipeg, when they were London (England) with the opening of experiencing industrialization and urban Toynbee Hall in 1884. They were then called growth. Most of Vancouver’s NHs, however, settlement houses because early leaders lived were opened post World War II when it was in the houses, i.e., they settled in them. experiencing a huge population influx, racial Hundreds of houses were quickly founded in tensions, and urban development. These various locations in Europe, North America, houses were often initiated by citizen action Australia, Asia, and elsewhere. They are still groups/associations that organized to address being founded today in communities of the needs of their communities in face of economic and social deprivation. The newest larger political and economic forces. NHs in Metro-Vancouver were founded in 2004 (Surrey) and 2005 (Downtown East While NHs in other places were often founded Side). by particular religious institutions or 182 universities and colleges, this was not so in not accept African American guests. The Metro-Vancouver. Rather, these houses were conference was held instead at the intentionally nonsectarian. And neither the Devonshire Hotel and, by all accounts, it was University of British Columbia (UBC) nor later, a success. Simon Fraser University, officially sponsored or endorsed any of the NHs although UBC What is now called the Association of NHs BC social work students did their placements in was formed in 1966 and hired its first them and NH staff acted as their field executive director. Its purpose was to enable supervisors. NHs to present a unified budget regarding the various services and needs that exist Despite the British colonial ties of Vancouver, throughout the metro area, publicize the its leaders were more influenced by the ideas importance of NHs in the lives of thousands and experiences of American NH leaders than of people and their contributions to civic by British ones. They especially admired Jane wellbeing, and improve salaries and training Addams and Graham Taylor, two influential for NH staff. Half of Metro-Vancouver’s NHs Chicago-based leaders, while Helen Hall and currently belong to the association. Paul Kellogg of New York City advised them on how to initially form Alexandra NH. During May and June of 1976 Vancouver Furthermore, most of the early NH leaders in welcomed hundreds of visitors to participate Vancouver came from Eastern Canada. in the 1st UN Habitat Conference on Human Settlements, the Habitat Forum, and the While not as politically active as NHs in other International Federation of Settlements (IFS) locales, NHs here supported the 1949 UN conference, the latter organized by Metro- Declaration on the Rights of the Child, the Vancouver NHs. The IFS conference 1968 Brief to the Royal Commission on the participants applauded the goal of the UN Status of Women, and the efforts in the 1960s conference and the forum to include “local to eliminate poverty; they agreed with Pierre people in planning for a better life, a better Burton’s adage that poverty exists because nation, a better world,” which is exactly what society would rather invest in things than in NHs have always aimed to do. people. In the 1980s NHs bussed their people to the annual Marches for Peace to oppose the A huge loss occurred when Marpole Place NH escalating nuclear arms race. closed in 2014 because of insufficient funding. Although the City of Vancouver is looking for Miscellany a non-profit operator to deliver needed social programs in the community and will donate Some fascinating people have been involved the building rent free for ten years, the future in Metro-Vancouver’s NHs over the years agency needs to secure the funding for its including BC’s first woman judge, Helen proposed programs and staff; it may or may Gregory MacGill; singer Juliette, a CBC not be a NH. Financial challenges have celebrity in the 1950s and 1960s; legendary existed throughout the almost 80-year tap dancer Jeni LeGon, who taught history of NHs in Metro-Vancouver and will generations of students in Vancouver; likely continue. journalist Denny Boyd, a popular Vancouver Sun reporter; and politician Grace MacInnis NH Week is celebrated annually in early May who held terms in both the provincial by the four municipalities of Metro-Vancouver legislature and the federal parliament. that are lucky to have NHs. It is a way to honour their contributions to building and In 1950 Harry M. Morrow, executive director sustaining relationships of support and of Alexandra NH, organized a conference solidarity between people and in their which was to include NH people from the communities. NH Week occurs at the same American Northwest, and reserved rooms and time in many places throughout the world and conference space at the Georgia Hotel. He seems to always involve food, a vital part of cancelled as soon as he learned that it would the “living and sharing of life” itself. 183 CITY OF PORT MOODY

WHEREAS the Association of Neighbourhood Houses of B.C. builds healthy and engaged communities by connecting people and strengthening their capacity to create change;

AND WHEREAS Sasamat Outdoor Centre in Port Moody contributes to the mission of Neighbourhood Houses by enriching lives and building strong communities through learning and playing in the outdoors;

AND WHEREAS the City of Port Moody is committed to supporting an engaged, inclusive and socially just community where all citizens and visitors participate;

NOW, THEREFORE the Council of the City of Port Moody does hereby declare the week of May 3 rd to May 9th, 2020 as

“NEIGHBOURHOOD HOUSE WEEK”

Dated this 14th day of April, 2020

DRAFT 184

From: Sandra Niven [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: March-24-20 5:02 PM Subject: Proclamation request: May is Cystic Fibrosis Awareness Month

Hello,

I would like to submit a request for a proclamation, that May is 'Cystic Fibrosis Awareness Month'. I realise that, with the ongoing coronavirus restrictions, I cannot appear in person but am happy to make a call, if needed.

About CF: https://www.cysticfibrosis.ca/about-cf Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common fatal genetic disease affecting Canadian children and young adults. At present, there is no cure. CF causes various effects on the body, but mainly affects the digestive system and lungs. The degree of CF severity differs from person to person, however, the persistence and ongoing infection in the lungs, with destruction of lungs and loss of lung function, will eventually lead to death in the majority of people with CF.

Below (and attached) is the draft proclamation wording for your consideration:

WHEREAS the exceptional progress that has been made in Canada in cystic fibrosis research and care for many Canadians who battle this progressive disease every day merits recognition, and

WHEREAS cystic fibrosis affects 4,371 Canadians and is the most common fatal genetic disease affecting Canadian children and young adults, and

WHEREAS Cystic Fibrosis Canada is one of the world’s top charitable organizations committed to finding a cure for cystic fibrosis, and

WHEREAS since 1960, Cystic Fibrosis Canada has invested more than $261 million in leading research, innovation and care, resulting in one of the world’s highest survival rates for people living with cystic fibrosis, and

WHEREAS, thanks to significant progress in cystic fibrosis care, the majority of Canadian children with cystic fibrosis will reach adulthood, and

WHEREAS Cystic Fibrosis Canada is committed to ensuring that those living with cystic fibrosis have access to the innovative treatments and medications they need to live healthier and longer lives, and

WHEREAS British Columbians are urged to lend their whole-hearted support, most particularly in the month of May, towards the goal of finding a cure for cystic fibrosis;

NOW KNOW YE THAT, We do by these presents proclaim and declare that May 2020 shall be known as “Cystic Fibrosis Awareness Month”

Thank you for considering this request. Please let me know if you have any questions. I look forward to hearing from you.

Kind regards,

Sandra

Sandra Niven Associate, Fund Development 185

Cystic Fibrosis Canada, British Columbia and Yukon Region Effective April: 254 - 4664 Lougheed Hwy, Burnaby, BC V5C 3Y2 Tel: 604-436-1158 ext. 105 | Mobile: 778-861-1972 Monday – Friday 8:00am – 4:00pm (PDT) [email protected] www.cysticfibrosis.ca Sign up for our newsletter! http://bit.ly/CFBCYKnewsletter

Charitable Registration No. 10684-5100 RR0001

186

CITY OF PORT MOODY

WHEREAS the exceptional progress that has been made in Canada in cystic fibrosis research and care for many Canadians who battle this progressive disease every day merits recognition;

AND WHEREAS cystic fibrosis affects 4,371 Canadians and is the most common fatal genetic disease affecting Canadian children and young adults.

AND WHEREAS Cystic Fibrosis Canada is one of the world’s top charitable organizations committed to finding a cure for cystic fibrosis;

AND WHEREAS since 1960, Cystic Fibrosis Canada has invested more than $261 million in leading research, innovation and care, resulting in one of the world’s highest survival rates for people living with cystic fibrosis;

AND WHEREAS thanks to significant progress in cystic fibrosis care, the majority of Canadian children with cystic fibrosis will reach adulthood;

AND WHEREAS Cystic Fibrosis Canada is committed to ensuring that those living with cystic fibrosis have access to the innovative treatments and medications they need to live healthier and longer lives;

AND WHEREAS British Columbians are urged to lend their whole-hearted support, most particularly in the month of May, towards the goal of finding a cure for cystic fibrosis;

NOW, THEREFORE the Council of the City of Port Moody does hereby declare the month of May, 2020 as

“CYSTIC FIBROSIS AWARENESS MONTH”

Dated this 14th day of April, 2020 DRAFT 187

For Metro Vancouver meetings on Friday, February 28, 2020 Please note these are not the official minutes. Board in Brief is an informal summary. Material relating to any of the following items is available on request from Metro Vancouver. For more information, please contact [email protected] or [email protected]

Metro Vancouver Regional District

E 1.1 UBCM Emergency Preparedness Grant Applications for Electoral Area A (UBC/UEL) APPROVED

The Union of BC Municipalities (UBCM) has grants available through the Community Emergency Preparedness Fund to support members in increasing emergency preparedness and emergency response capacity. Metro Vancouver has long planned that emergency response in the Point Grey portion of Electoral Area A would best be coordinated through an Area Emergency Operations Centre established at the University of British Columbia due to its proximity to, and availability of, local agency representatives. Additionally, through partnership with UBC, increasing the pool of Emergency Support Services volunteers available to take care of the needs of displaced people following an emergency in the Point Grey is an area to enhance emergency preparedness.

The Board endorsed the applications for two grants totaling $41,836 from UBCM to enhance emergency preparedness capacity in the Point Grey (UBC/UEL) communities of Electoral Area A.

E 2.1 Regional Parks Natural Resource Management Framework APPROVED

The Regional Parks Natural Resource Management Framework provides strategic direction for managing the natural resources within regional parks. First developed 10 years ago, considerable progress has been made towards its goals. In 2019, the Regional Parks Natural Resource Management Framework was updated to ensure alignment with the Regional Parks Plan (2016) and other strategic documents. It outlines the principles, goals and strategies of the natural resource management program to ensure system-wide consistency in resource management efforts. The framework provides staff, elected officials and the public with a tool for transparent and consistent decision making.

The Board endorsed the Regional Parks Natural Resource Management Framework as presented.

E 3.1 Fraser Basin Council - Annual Report to Metro Vancouver RECEIVED

As required under a three-year Contribution Agreement with Metro Vancouver, the Fraser Basin Council submitted the annual report to Metro Vancouver to summarize their work in 2019 and to highlight the priorities for 2020. The annual report provides details on the work performed in the areas of taking action on climate change and air quality, supporting healthy watersheds and water resources, and building sustainable and resilient communities and regions.

The Board received the report for information.

188

E 3.2 Federal Gas Tax Fund Expenditures Policy Amendments APPROVED

This report brings forward updates to the Federal Gas Tax Fund Expenditures Policy and associated Application Guide, which sets out the process for Board approval of the Federal Gas Tax Fund (Greater Vancouver Regional Fund or GVRF) for regional transportation projects proposed by TransLink.

Based on consultations with TransLink and Union of BC Municipalities staff, a number of amendments were prepared. While many of the amendments fall into the category of ‘housekeeping,’ substantive amendments involve: affirming the current practice of TransLink staff referring applications to Metro Vancouver staff to initiate the application review process; the annual reporting out by TransLink on active projects funded through the GVRF; and, the baseline assumptions for transit vehicle technology for purposes of accurately portraying emissions changes. The updated Policy and Application Guide will help improve transparency, consistency, and efficiency of the process and applications.

The Board approved the revised Federal Gas Tax Fund Expenditures Policy and the associated Application Guide as presented.

E 3.3 National Zero Waste Council Annual Update RECEIVED

The Board received an update about the National Zero Waste Council. An initiative of Metro Vancouver, the National Zero Waste Council promotes cross-sector collaboration in advancing waste prevention and accelerating the transition to a circular economy. The Council supports Metro Vancouver in the achievement of its zero waste objectives. A key contribution has been reinforcing the importance of waste prevention and how it relates to the circular economy and climate change. Specific initiatives over the past year include work to examine and promote actions that will prevent and reduce food loss and waste, efforts to accelerate the transition to a circular economy, work to identify priority, problematic single use plastic items and supporting regulatory measures, and pilot projects to prevent/reduce waste associated with construction and demolition. The Council has become much more engaged in the cross- Canada initiatives to reduce the damaging impacts on marine ecosystems and the financial burden local governments incur in dealing with plastic wastes and single use items.

E 4.1 2020 Regional Clothing Waste Reduction Campaign RECEIVED

The Board received a report about the 2020 Regional Clothing Waste Reduction Campaign.

Clothing is one of the fastest growing waste streams, accounting for approximately 20,000 tonnes of waste annually in Metro Vancouver. On February 18, 2020 Metro Vancouver will launch the second year of the “Think Thrice About Your Clothes” campaign, which will be in-market for nine weeks.

The objective of Think Thrice is to raise awareness of the clothing waste issue and empower residents to take action by focusing on three main areas of clothing waste reduction: 1) Reduce; 2) Care & Repair; and 3) Donate. Post-2019 campaign survey results will be leveraged to target specific audience demographics providing clear calls to action, and directing those audiences to the corresponding areas of the www.clothesarentgarbage.ca website. A targeted media buy will include both digital and out-of-home placements. Standard campaign evaluation indicators will be used to measure campaign effectiveness.

189

E 5.1 2020 Regional District Sustainability Innovation Fund Applications APPROVED

The Climate Action Committee is responsible for overseeing the Sustainability Innovation Funds, and for making all funding recommendations to the respective Boards. This report presents eight projects recommended for funding, totaling $1,108,000 over three years, which will be funded through the Regional District Sustainability Innovation Fund. The projects include three addressing affordable housing and climate change, two enhancing ecological health in Regional Parks, and three related to air quality improvement.

The Board approved the allocation from the Regional District Sustainability Innovation Fund for the following projects:

 Building Resilience: Exploring the Potential of Renewable Energy Building Infrastructure: $200,000 over two years starting in 2020  Net-Zero Feasibility Study for Welcher Affordable Housing Development: $160,000 over two years starting in 2020;  Step Code Implementation Impacts for Building Envelope Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings: $90,000 over two years starting in 2020  Targeted Invasive Plant Grazing in Metro Vancouver: $150,000 over three years starting in 2020  Using eDNA Sampling Technology in Regional Parks: $68,000 over two years starting in 2020  Preventing Smoke Emissions from Agricultural Waste Management: $140,000 over two years starting in 2020  Clean Air for Students and Schools (CLASS): $200,000 over two years starting in 2020  Mobile Monitoring of Fugitive and Other Industrial Air Emissions with "Flying Labs": $100,000 in 2020.

E 5.2 Invasive Species Education and Outreach Materials APPROVED

Metro Vancouver, the Invasive Species Council of BC, the Invasive Species Council of Metro Vancouver, and members of the Regional Planning Advisory Committee – Invasive Species Subcommittee have collaboratively created two new outreach products to raise awareness about invasive species of concern across the region: an online course and a public brochure.

The Board directed staff to share these materials with member jurisdictions for information.

E 5.3 Board Appointments and Rescindments of Enforcement Officers APPROVED

Recent changes in staff have resulted in a need to update staff appointments as MVRD Board-designated officers under the Greater Vancouver Regional District Air Quality Management Bylaw, the Environmental Management Act and the Offence Act.

The Board appointed Nicole Gatto as an officer and rescinded the appointments of former Metro Vancouver employees Larry Avanthay, Kristen Beattie and Johanna Legge as officers. The same was done for serving summons under the Offence act.

190

G 1.1 Electoral Area A Building Administration Amendment Bylaw No. 1301, 2020 APPROVED

GVRD Electoral Area A Building Administration Bylaw, No. 1043, 2006 regulates the construction of buildings in rural parts of Electoral Area A. It has not been amended since its adoption in 2006, and in March 2018, the MVRD Board directed staff to review the bylaw. Subsequent to staff’s review, a draft bylaw update was presented for consideration by the Electoral Area Committee and MVRD Board. Proposed amendments include: updating the permit fee schedule (Schedule D) and increasing the building permit validity time, which responds to resident input regarding the need for more time to complete construction in rural and remote portions of the Electoral Area, along with a number of clean-up and administrative revisions.

The Board gave first, second and third readings to Electoral Area A Building Administration Amendment Bylaw and passed and finally adopted said bylaw.

G 2.1 Metro Vancouver Regional District Dedication of Land as Regional Park Bylaw No. APPROVED 1300, 2020

The Local Government Act authorizes a regional district to dedicate land as regional park by way of a bylaw. Bylaw 1300, 2020 will dedicate land acquired in 2019 by MVRD for use as regional park.

The Board gave first, second and third readings to Metro Vancouver Regional District Dedication of Land as Regional Park Bylaw No. 1300, 2020; and passed and finally adopted said bylaw.

G 3.1 MVRD Procedure Amending Bylaw No. 1297, 2020 APPROVED

In 2019, the MVRD Board established the regional economic prosperity service. To support that new service, the Board Chair established a standing committee called the Regional Economic Prosperity Management Board. This 27 member standing committee comprises a cross section of representatives from various sectors, including five directors. This situation is not compliant with the Procedure Bylaw which stipulates that a majority of committee members must be directors. Given the unique nature of this new standing committee, an amendment to the Procedure Bylaw is being sought to provide an exemption to this majority-director provision

The Board gave first, second and third readings to Metro Vancouver Regional District Procedure Amending Bylaw Number 1297, 2020, then passed and finally adopted said bylaw.

191

G 2.1 Metro Vancouver Signing Officers Amending Bylaws – MVRD, GVS&DD and GVWD APPROVED

Board-approved bylaws were adopted to establish authority for the execution of financial matters relating to Metro Vancouver’s Districts. The Districts are currently functioning under the existing bylaw. The previous Signing Officer Bylaws are in need of updating for position titles and modern banking practice language. A reduction in the number of positions with signing authority was also desired to reduce the administrative maintenance for individuals that would not likely be called on to sign documents.

The Board gave first, second and third readings to Metro Vancouver Regional District Financial Services Administration and Signing Authority Amending Bylaw No. 1302, 2020, then passed and finally adopted said bylaw.

G 4.1 Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1295 – Alignment with IPCC APPROVED Report on Global Warming

At its November 1, 2019 meeting, the MVRD Board initiated a Type 3 minor amendment to Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future, and gave first, second and third readings to an amending bylaw with the intent of reflecting a commitment to a carbon neutral region by 2050 and an interim target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 45% from 2010 levels by 2030.

Metro Vancouver staff notified affected local governments and affected agencies of the proposed amendment. Eight responses were received during the notification period, all indicating support or no objections to the amendment bylaw.

The Board received for information the comments from the affected local governments and agencies as presented and passed and finally adopted Metro Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1295, 2019.

I 1 Committee Information Items & Delegation Summaries RECEIVED

The Board received information items from standing committees.

Electoral Area Committee – February 5, 2020

Information Items:

5.2 Electoral Area A Zoning Bylaw Review – Public Consultation Update

A zoning bylaw review was identified as an action in the Electoral Area A Official Community Plan, adopted in 2018. The MVRD Board approved the scope for the zoning bylaw review in July 2019, and staff and the Electoral Area A Director held two rounds of community meetings in the fall for residents where the zoning bylaw applies. Public input will be used to draft proposed amendments to the zoning bylaw, which will be posted to the Metro Vancouver website in spring for additional public feedback before an amending bylaw is prepared for Committee and Board consideration.

192

Regional Planning Committee – February 7, 2020

Information Items:

5.2 2016 Walkability Index – Metro 2040 Performance Monitoring

The 2016 Walkability Index surface is a parcel-level, built environment dataset that uses 2016 data to show the walkability score of neighbourhoods at the postal code scale. Walkability is a Key Summary Measure for Metro 2040 Goal 4. Maps of the 2016 Walkability Index show that the region’s Urban Centres and Frequent Transit Development Areas are among the most walkable areas in the region, demonstrating good alignment between the Metro 2040 vision and urban development in practice on the ground.

There are multiple factors that contribute to making an area more walkable including sidewalk completeness, intersection density, residential density, commercial density and land use mix. Improving walkability has many benefits including better health outcomes for residents, improved access to local destinations, improved sense of community and safety, and reduced dependence on private vehicles which in turn supports the region’s GHG reduction targets.

5.3 Metro 2040 Climate and Natural Hazards Policy Review Scope of Work

Goal 3 of Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future (Metro 2040), the regional growth strategy, contains strategies to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and to manage risks associated with climate change and other natural hazards. As part of a comprehensive update to Metro 2040, staff are conducting several thematic policy reviews. The purpose of the Climate and Natural Hazards Policy Review is to strengthen climate mitigation, climate adaptation and natural hazard policies throughout the regional growth strategy. The engagement opportunities and deliverables will be shared to support both Metro 2050 (the update to Metro 2040), and Climate 2050. It is anticipated that the Climate and Natural Hazards Policy Review will take approximately 8 months to complete and the Regional Planning Committee will be updated at that time.

5.4 Metro 2040 Environment Policy Review – Update on Policy Option Development

On October 21, 2019 staff circulated a survey to Regional Planning Advisory Committee members and associates via email and requested feedback on six high level environmental land use policy ideas. Staff received 11 responses expressing general support for consideration of all six policy ideas in the Environment Policy Review. Staff will provide the Committee with an update on the Metro 2040 Environment Policy Review mid-2020 and Metro 2050 policy recommendations for its consideration in the third quarter of this year.

5.5 Updating Metro 2040’s Housing Demand Estimates

Table A.2 of Metro 2040 sets out Housing Demand Estimates to assist Metro Vancouver’s municipalities when preparing Regional Context Statements and Housing Action Plans, and is used to support Metro Vancouver’s regional planning and utility planning functions. Regional Planning staff are undertaking an update to the Housing Demand Estimates and its projection methodology to provide current data to support the update to Metro 2040 and TransLink’s new Regional Transportation Strategy. This project will be finalized and will be presented for the Committee’s consideration by February of 2021.

193

5.6 Results of the Regional Stakeholder Workshop and Transport 2050 Phase 1 Engagement Survey and Key Findings for Metro 2050

Metro Vancouver and TransLink have been working together on engagement activities to support the development of Metro 2050 and Transport 2050. The results of these engagement activities and key findings for the development of Metro 2050 are summarized in this report.

Finance and Intergovernment Committee – February 12, 2020

Information Items:

5.7 Metro Vancouver’s 2019 Zero Waste Conference

On October 30 and 31, 2019, over 500 people participated in the 2019 Zero Waste Conference, hosted by Metro Vancouver and the National Zero Waste Council. The program was filled with unique perspectives, valuable insights and inspirational messages that attracted a diverse audience of individuals from government, business, academia and NGOs interested in waste prevention and a transition to a circular economy. With these kind of individuals present, the Conference was a unique and rewarding learning and networking environment – one that was enhanced in 2019 by a new conference app and informal opportunities for participants to network during breaks in the program. The conference also provided an opportunity to influence planning for Canada’s hosting of the World Circular Economy Forum in 2020, with a closing panel of Canadian leaders in circular economy engaging with each other and the audience on how to mobilize for success in creating a Circular Canada.

5.8 2019 International Events

This report brings forward an update on 2019 International Events attended as part of the Leadership and Engagement program. In accordance with the Board adopted Leadership and Engagement Policy, Metro Vancouver will participate, at both a national and at an international level, in events that promote Metro Vancouver in a leadership role or that provide opportunity for engagement and continuous improvement in the advancement of organizational goals.

Greater Vancouver Water District

E 1.1 2020 Water Sustainability Innovation Fund Applications APPROVED

The Climate Action Committee is responsible for overseeing the Sustainability Innovation Funds and for making all funding recommendations to the respective Boards. This report presents three projects recommended for funding, totaling $950,000 over three years, which will be funded through the Water Sustainability Innovation Fund. The three projects include advancement of methods to monitor water disinfection by-products, an earthquake early warning pilot project, and enhancements to the water flow monitoring network.

194

The Board approved the allocation from the Water Sustainability Innovation Fund for the following projects:

 UV Transmittance Analyzers for Continuous Monitoring of Disinfection By-Products: $500,000 over three years starting in 2020  Earthquake Early Warning and Strategic Response System Pilot: $270,000 over two years starting in 2020  Enhancing the Data Processing of the Water Flow Metering Network: $180,000 over two years starting in 2020

G 1.1 Metro Vancouver Signing Officers Amending Bylaws – MVRD, GVS&DD and GVWD APPROVED

The Board gave first, second and third readings to Greater Vancouver Water District Financial Services Administration and Signing Authority Amending Bylaw No. 252, 2020, then passed and finally adopted said bylaw.

I 1 Committee Information Items & Delegation Summaries RECEIVED

The Board received an information item from the February 13, 2020 Water Committee meeting:

5.2 Water Use by Sector in Metro Vancouver: 1985 – 2017 The “GVWD and Local Government Water Use by Sector Report 1985 - 2017” outlines the trends in water use by sector in the Metro Vancouver region.

Per capita water consumption has steadily declined since 1985, keeping annual average water consumption relatively steady despite a growing regional population. In more recent years, there are indications that per capita reductions are stabilizing, resulting in a gradual overall increase in annual water consumption emphasizing the need for continued effort on water conservation initiatives. In 2017, it is estimated that the residential sector accounted for approximately 58 percent of the total water use in the region. Industrial, commercial, institutional, and agricultural sectors accounted for approximately 5, 13, 5, and 2 percent of total water use, respectively. Within non-residential sectors, retail stores, businesses/offices and warehouses were among the top end users of water in the region.

Water use by sector trends in the region provide valuable information for utility planning and the development of water conservation and efficiency programs. Historical water use patterns in the region can inform planning and implementation of GVWD and local government water management practices.

195

Greater Vancouver Sewage and Drainage District

E 1.1 Award of Contract Resulting from Request for Proposal No. 19-194: Construction APPROVED Services - Burnaby Lake North Interceptor No. 2 – Phase 2 – Open Cut Section

The construction of Burnaby Lake North Interceptor No. 2 - Phase 2 - Open Cut Section is required to enhance sewer capacity in the City of Burnaby. The project consists of installation of approximately 880 linear metres of reinforced concrete sanitary sewer pipe via open cut methods in Burnaby, BC. A Request for Proposal was issued to five prequalified contractors on October 10, 2019 and three submissions were received. After the evaluation process, JJM Construction Ltd. had the highest ranked proposal.

The Board approved the award of a contract for an amount of up to $16,599,950 (exclusive of taxes) to JJM Construction Ltd. resulting from Request for Proposal No. 19-194.

E 2.1 Construction Contract Award Resulting from Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 19-313: APPROVED Construction of a Completed Recycling and Solid Waste Drop-off Facility

Metro Vancouver is initiating the construction of the Surrey Recycling and Waste Drop-Off Facility at 6711 154th Street, Surrey. This facility will address a service gap and enhance the Metro Vancouver network of solid waste facilities in this growing area of the region.

Six experienced firms were shortlisted from Request for Qualifications No. 19-063 and invited to respond to RFP No. 19-313 for facility construction. The RFP closed on December 19, 2019 and five firms submitted proposals. Based on the evaluation of the proposals, Clark Builders was identified as the highest ranked and offered the lowest fee proposal.

The Board approved the award of a contract in the amount of up to $25,575,000 (exclusive of taxes) to Clark Builders resulting from Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 19-313.

Furthermore, the Board directed staff to report back in advance of the opening of the new Coquitlam Transfer Station and the Surrey Recycling and Waste Drop-Off with details of Metro Vancouver’s transfer station recycling depot funding model and any proposed updates to the model to ensure equitable funding of regional and municipal depots.

E 2.2 Consulting Contract Amendment: Phase D: Construction Administration and Post APPROVED Construction Services for Surrey Recycling and Waste Drop-Off Facility

Metro Vancouver is initiating the construction of the Surrey Recycling and Waste Drop-Off Facility at 6711 154th Street, Surrey. This facility will expand the Metro Vancouver network of solid waste facilities, filling a service level gap in this growing area of the region.

Request for Qualifications No. 17-090 for Engineering Services was awarded to Morrison Hershfield in December 2017. The services proposed in the RFQ included four phases: Phase A: Conceptual Design and Design Basis Memorandum, Phase B: Preliminary Design, Phase C: Detailed Design and Tender Package, and Phase D: Construction Administration and Post Construction Services.

196

The proposed contract amendment for an amount of up to $2,576,631 (exclusive of taxes) will authorize Morrison Hershfield to proceed with Phase D, including construction administration, commissioning and oversight services for the project. This represents a total consulting expenditure of $4,967,544.

The Board approved the award of Phase D: Construction Administration and Post Construction Services for an amount of up to $2,576,631 (exclusive of taxes) to the Phase A, B and C consultant, Morrison Hershfield Limited, for the Surrey Recycling and Waste Drop-Off Facility project.

E 3.1 2020 Liquid Waste Sustainability Innovation Fund Application APPROVED

The Climate Action Committee is responsible for overseeing the Sustainability Innovation Funds, and for making all funding recommendations to the respective Boards. This report presented one project recommended for funding, totaling $330,000 over three years, which will be funded through the Liquid Waste Sustainability Innovation Fund. The project proposes the use of handheld microbial DNA monitoring to more effectively detect wastewater treatment plant issues.

The Board approved the allocation from the Liquid Waste Sustainability Innovation Fund of $330,000 over three years starting in 2020 for the Handheld Wastewater Microbial DNA Monitor project.

G 1.1 Metro Vancouver Signing Officers Amending Bylaws – MVRD, GVS&DD and GVWD APPROVED

The Board gave first, second and third readings to Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Financial Services Administration and Signing Authority Amending Bylaw No. 334, 2020, then passed and finally adopted said bylaw.

G 2.1 Disposal of Out of Region & International Waste at the Waste-to-Energy Facility APPROVED

Metro Vancouver’s Tipping Fee Bylaw sets rates and requirements at regional solid waste facilities. Under the bylaw, the Board may authorize disposal of municipal solid waste from outside of Metro Vancouver at the Waste-to-Energy Facility. Metro Vancouver periodically receives requests to dispose of waste from outside of the region, including international waste.

The Board approved amending the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Tipping Fee and Solid Waste Disposal Regulation Bylaw No. 306, 2017 to delegate authority to the General Manager of Solid Waste Services to approve requests to receive up to 1,500 tonnes per year per generator of out of region waste and international waste, and to apply the Special Handle Waste tipping fee of $250 per tonne to Out of Region Waste. The Board gave first, second and third readings to the amending bylaw then passed and finally adopted said bylaw.

197

Metro Vancouver Housing Corporation

E 1.1 Metro Vancouver Housing Corporation Tenant Selection Policy Revision APPROVED

Metro Vancouver Housing is undertaking a review of all its policies to ensure clarity and consistency. The Tenant Selection Policy has been updated to consolidate a number of individual policies, update income and asset limits to further align with BC Housing, and provide greater clarity for staff and tenants. It establishes consistent criteria to ensure Metro Vancouver Housing tenants are matched with housing that is equitable and appropriate, prioritizing very low to moderate income households to align with the vision in the Metro Vancouver Housing 10-Year Plan. The Board approved the revised Tenant Selection Policy as presented in the report.

E 1.2 Metro Vancouver Housing Redevelopment Plan APPROVED

The Metro Vancouver Housing 10-Year Plan sets key targets for Metro Vancouver Housing over the next decade, including targets for redevelopment and maintenance of its existing housing sites. The Metro Vancouver Housing Redevelopment Plan represents a critical next step in implementing the 10-Year Plan by outlining a process to assess and prioritize existing housing sites for redevelopment or renewal over time. The Redevelopment Plan provides an objective approach for how the organization will consider complex trade-offs and guide investment decisions. The Board approved the Metro Vancouver Housing Redevelopment Plan as presented.

I 1 Committee Information Items & Delegation Summaries RECEIVED

The Board received a delegation summary from the February 5, 2020 Housing Committee meeting, from Lisa Nissanov, Team Manager, Reaching Home, Vancity Community Foundation.

198

For Metro Vancouver meetings on Friday, March 27, 2020 Please note these are not the official minutes. Board in Brief is an informal summary. Material relating to any of the following items is available on request from Metro Vancouver. For more information, please contact [email protected] or [email protected]

Metro Vancouver Regional District

E 1.1 Metro 2040 Urban Centre and FTDA Policy Review – Final Recommendations REFERRED

The Metro 2040 Urban Centre and FTDA Policy Review is an initiative to explore implementation challenges and areas for improvement to the regional growth framework of the regional growth strategy. The review is now complete and staff have drafted five recommendations intended to provide direction on addressing the identified challenges and improve the Urban Centre and FTDA policies that will be included in Metro 2050, the update to the regional growth strategy.

The MVRD Board referred this item back to staff.

E 2.1 Contribution Agreement – Catching the Spirit 2019 Youth Society APPROVED

The MVRD Board approved the Contribution Agreement with the Catching the Spirit 2019 Youth Society for a three-year term commencing January 1, 2020 and ending December 31, 2022, with annual contributions of $75,000 per year.

E 2.2 Regional Parks Naming, Renaming, and Dedications Policy Revision APPROVED

In 2019, Metro Vancouver staff reviewed the existing Regional Parks Naming and Dedications Policy and proposed amendments to enable consideration of Indigenous place names, renaming and dual naming in regional parks. The MVRD Board approved the Regional Parks Naming, Renaming, and Dedications Policy as presented.

E 3.1 BC Utilities Commission Municipal Energy Utilities Inquiry APPROVED

The MVRD Board will write to the British Columbia Utilities Commission concerning the Municipal Energy Utilities Inquiry, conveying its position that municipalities should continue to retain core decision making about district energy services, because local governments are well positioned to implement and regulate district energy, and municipal energy utilities occupy a unique and important role for addressing climate change.

199

E 4.1 Addressing the Greenhouse Gas Intensity of Buildings in the BC Building Code APPROVED

Buildings account for one quarter of regional GHG emissions, primarily through burning natural gas for space and water heating. The BC Energy Step Code, adopted by many jurisdictions in the region and across B.C., establishes energy efficiency targets, but does not directly address GHG emissions reductions in new construction. This will lead to many new buildings that will require significant retrofits to become carbon neutral in the future, costing building owners time and money.

The MVRD Board will write a letter to the provincial Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing and other appropriate provincial government ministries requesting that the Province include: • opt-in greenhouse gas intensity performance requirements for new construction in the British Columbia Building Code; • an option to require zero emissions space heating and hot water; and • complementary requirements in the proposed provincial “Retrofit Code” for existing buildings.

G 1.1 Regional Parkland Acquisition and Development Reserve Fund Bylaw No. 1304, 2020 APPROVED

The MVRD Board approved the establishment of a new statutory reserve for Regional Parks to receive, hold and provide funds for Regional Park Land Acquisition and Park Development; gave first, second, and third readings to the Regional Parkland Acquisition and Development Reserve Fund Bylaw then passed and finally adopted said bylaw.

G 2.1 MVRD Residential Indoor Wood Burning Emission Regulation Bylaw No. 1303, 2020 APPROVED

Wood smoke is a major source of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions, including black carbon associated with climate change. Staff presented a bylaw intended to reduce the health and environmental impacts of emissions from residential indoor wood burning while responding to needs identified during a comprehensive consultation process.

The MVRD Board gave first, second and third readings to the Residential Indoor Wood Burning Emission Regulation Bylaw; then passed and finally adopted said bylaw.

I 1 Committee Information Items and Delegation Summaries

The Board received information items and delegation summaries from standing committees.

Regional Planning Committee – March 6, 2020

Information Items:

5.3 Regional Industrial Lands Strategy - Draft and Status Update

The Regional Industrial Lands Strategy is nearing completion after two years of research and engagement work. Informed through the current and final round of stakeholder engagement, it is anticipated that the

200

Strategy will be finalized in spring 2020, for consideration by the Industrial Lands Strategy Task Force and the MVRD Board. The Strategy, as well as other related work, will also inform the update to the regional growth strategy that is currently underway (Metro 2050). Metro Vancouver staff are in the process of engaging with stakeholders to receive further input on the draft Strategy’s proposed recommendations.

5.4 Metro 2040 Industrial and Mixed Employment Policy Review Scope of Work

To inform the update to Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future (Metro 2040), the regional growth strategy, Metro Vancouver is undertaking an Industrial and Mixed Employment Policy Review. The Policy Review, along with results from the forthcoming Regional Industrial Lands Strategy will provide key inputs into the update, and will include engagement with member municipalities and industry stakeholders to test and refine recommended policy changes to the regional growth strategy. The Committee can expect to see a report on the completed policy review by mid-2020.

5.5 Metro 2050 Q1 2020 Status Update

In April 2019, Metro Vancouver began the process of updating Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future (Metro 2040), the regional growth strategy. The amended regional growth strategy will be titled Metro 2050. The development of content for Metro 2050 is taking place through a series of policy reviews on different policy topics; progress on these is summarized below. Engagement activities are guided by the Metro Vancouver Board-approved Metro 2050 Engagement Plan and those activities that have already occurred are summarized below.

Finance and Intergovernment Committee – March 11, 2020

Delegation Summaries:

3.1 Craig Richmond, President and CEO, Vancouver Airport Authority, Anne Murray, Vice President Airline Business Development and Public Affairs, Vancouver Airport Authority, and Wayne Wright, Metro Vancouver’s Appointee to the YVR Board of Directors.

Greater Vancouver Water District

E 1.1 Award of Phase C - Construction Engineering Services for the Annacis Water WITHDRAWN Supply Tunnel

This item was withdrawn.

I 1 Committee Information Items and Delegation Summaries

The Board received information items and delegation summaries from standing committees.

Water Committee – March 5, 2020

Information Items:

201

5.1 2019 Seymour Salmonid Society’s Annual Report for Greater Vancouver Water District

The Seymour Salmonid Society is a non-profit organization that operates the Seymour River Hatchery on Greater Vancouver Water District (GVRD) lands at the base of the Seymour Falls Dam. GVRD and the Society have been partners since 1989 constructing fisheries enhancement projects, raising public awareness on water and fisheries issues and creating stewardship opportunities in the Seymour Valley. Over the years, the partnership has influenced tens of thousands of people through special events, K-12 programs, and passive visitors. The GVWD has a current three-year (2018-2020) Contribution Agreement with the Society for $125,000 annually. The funding provides for core hatchery and education program operating expenses.

Greater Vancouver Sewage and Drainage District

E 1.1. Direct Connections to Regional Liquid Waste Facilities Policy APPROVED

Historically, member jurisdictions have requested direct connections to the regional sewer system to service private properties if municipal sewers were not available nearby, and Metro Vancouver assessed those requests on a case-by-case basis.

A policy was brought forward to formalize the process for direct connection requests to regional facilities, including who may apply, the criteria to do so, and ownership and maintenance responsibilities.

The GVS&DD Board approved the Direct Connections to Regional Liquid Waste Facilities Policy as presented.

G 1.1 Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District Sewerage and Drainage Areas APPROVED Boundaries Amending Bylaw No. 335, 2020 – Fraser Sewerage Area – PID 013-872- 303, Township of Langley

The GVS&DD Board gave first, second and third reading to the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District’s Sewerage and Drainage Areas Boundaries Amending Bylaw No. 335, 2020; and passed, and finally adopted the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District’s Sewerage and Drainage Areas Boundaries Amending Bylaw No. 335, 2020.

I 1 Committee Information Items and Delegation Summaries

The Board received information items and delegation summaries from standing committees.

Liquid Waste Committee – March 12, 2020

Information Items:

5.2 Results for 2019 Wipe It, Green Bin It Campaign

As a region, an estimated $2.7 million is spent every year to deal with the impacts of fats, oils and grease (FOG) in the sewer system. The 2019 Wipe It, Green Bin It campaign asked residents to put FOG in their green bins, instead of down their sinks.

202

Zero Waste Committee – March 13, 2020

Information Items:

5.1 Customer Service and Communication Enhancements at Metro Vancouver Solid Waste Facilities

Over the past year Metro Vancouver has expanded the number of communication tools available to customers to enhance their experience at solid waste facilities and encourage diversion. Accurate and accessible information about regional facility reuse, recycling and disposal services and programs can improve customer awareness and use of these services.

5.2 Create Memories Not Garbage – 2019 Campaign Results

The holidays are a heavy consumption season where residents fall into customs/traditions that can cause unnecessary waste. The 2019 “Create Memories, Not Garbage” campaign asked residents to try doing one thing differently to reduce their waste. Through a region-wide media promotion, residents were offered ideas to make low-waste celebrating easier.

Metro Vancouver Housing Corporation

E 1.1 Evaluation Criteria for Metro Vancouver Housing Development on Member Lands APPROVED

Metro Vancouver Housing (MVH) is actively working to build more affordable rental housing. One way is through partnerships with member jurisdictions. In February 2020, Metro Vancouver issued an Expression of Interest (EOI) for member jurisdictions to submit municipally-owned land to lease or transfer to MVH at a nominal cost.

The EOI outlines considerations for submissions including: development potential, municipal actions/incentives to support development, tenant livability, financial feasibility for MVH, and regional equity. Staff used these considerations to draft evaluation criteria and weighting to prioritize EOI submissions that best meet MVH’s objectives. The Housing Committee considered the evaluation criteria and provided direction for certain revisions.

The MVHC Board endorsed the evaluation criteria contained in the report.

203

February 27, 2020

The Honourable Selina Robinson Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing PO Box 9056 Stn Prov Govt Victoria, BC V8W 9E2

Dear Minister Robinson:

We appreciate the Province’s efforts to address the property tax issues being faced by small businesses and arts, culture and non-profit organizations in our communities.

Property tax reform is greatly needed as hundreds of small businesses and our community partners are impacted by property taxation on development potential for properties that are not developed to their highest and best use.

The interim property tax relief legislation announced on February 24, 2020 by the Province does not address property taxation on development potential. As well, it poses multiple implementation challenges including:

 The timing of the legislation does not allow sufficient time to engage stakeholders in a meaningful way, or to put processes in place to implement the legislation;  The data required to address the criteria of the legislation is not readily available; and  There could be unintended consequences such as businesses receiving tax relief for the wrong reasons, and struggling businesses and organizations end up paying higher taxes.

(A more detailed analysis of the challenges is provided in the attached Appendix.)

Further, we are concerned the proposed legislation will raise unrealistic expectations amongst small business, arts, culture and non-profit communities about the extent to relief to be provided which will likely result in additional public outcry and confusion.

We respectfully request the province to continue to work as part of the Intergovernmental Working Group (IWG) on implementing split assessment through a new commercial sub class – split assessment.

…2/ 204

This split assessment approach was recommended by the entire IWG as the most viable approach as:

 It addresses the root cause of the problem by allowing municipalities to tax existing use versus development potential differently;  It offers a common platform for municipalities while allowing a high degree of flexibility, scalability and customization, similar to the intent behind a permissive exemption. Municipalities can decide whether or not to use the tool and determine the eligibility requirement, tax rate and duration of the tax relief by-laws; and  It is more transparent and straight-forward to administer than the proposed permissive exemption approach.

For the past year and a half, chief financial officers from various municipalities worked with senior staff from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, as well as the Ministry of Finance and BC Assessment, as part of the IWG to review the development potential issue. In May 2019, the IWG submitted a recommendation for split assessment. The IWG agreed this was the most targeted approach to address the core issue – taxes on development potential – impacting small business, arts, culture and non-profit organizations.

The need for split assessment arises due to properties being assessed at highest and best use. As Metro Vancouver cities grow and evolve, official community plans (OCP) and neighborhood plans are developed to set out 20-25 year plans to densify communities to support anticipated population and job growth, and to expand commercial and light industrial space. As OCPs and neighborhood plans are implemented over time, certain properties will continue their existing use for a number of years until redevelopment occurs, while their assessed value reflects a higher and better future use as per OCPs/neighborhood plans.

At present, there is no property class for this future development potential as a type of use. Existing use value and the future development potential value is aggregated into the same property class. As a result, local governments cannot set different tax rates for existing use versus future development potential. This limitation has significantly impacted the viability of local independent businesses as well as the arts, culture and non-profit sectors, particular for tenants on triple net leases. The split assessment recommendation would create a sub class for this future development potential.

Moreover, the split-assessment recommendation proposed by the IWG would be enabling legislation that would only have to be adopted by municipalities that

…3/ 205

choose to use it, similar to the proposed interim solution. As well, it will not result in tax shift across municipalities – for municipalities that choose to use split assessment, any tax reallocation will be confined within the municipality.

In summary, while the interim solution put forward by the Province may satisfy the desire to put a mechanism in place for the 2020 tax year, given the challenges expressed above, the undersigned Mayors do not support the interim permissive property tax exemption legislation.

We respectfully request that the Province continue to work with the IWG on implementing split assessment through a new commercial sub class, in order to address the property tax impacts of development potential.

If you have any questions or concerns about the contents of this letter, please feel free to reach out to any of the signatories in this letter.

Sincerely,

Mayor Kennedy Stewart Mayor Richard Stewart City of Vancouver City of Coquitlam

Mayor Mike Little Mayor Maja Tait District of North Vancouver District of Sooke

Mayor Linda Buchanan Mayor Mary-Ann Booth City of North Vancouver City of West Vancouver

…4/ 206

Mayor Malcolm Brodie Mayor Mike Hurley City of Richmond City of Burnaby

Mayor George V. Harvie Mayor Rob Vagramov City of Delta City of Port Moody

Mayor Doug McCallum City of Surrey

207

Appendix: Challenges With Interim Property Tax Relief Legislation

Key challenges municipalities are facing with the Province’s interim property tax relief legislation include:

Public Consultation

- Similar to the Province needing more time for consultation across British Columbia before implementing split assessment, municipalities need time for public consultation and engagement with stakeholders prior to implementing any solution including a permissive tax exemption. Among other things, the public and stakeholders need to understand how and who can qualify for an exemption and the impacts of a permissive exemption.

- The proposed legislation will result in a transfer of the tax burden of both municipal and school taxes among taxpayers. Municipalities will be required to collect the same amount of school tax, which means the tax rate will have to be adjusted, resulting in a redistribution of the tax burden for school taxes. Municipalities will either have to collect less tax, or redistribute the tax burden among taxpayers.

- A structured policy is required to determine who receives benefits, the amount of the benefits, and who pays for the benefits. Time for proper consultation is critical to enable staff and elected officials to understand the issues and answer questions as to why some businesses receive benefits and others don’t. This is particularly important as the proposed legislation is not based on development potential, something that the public is keenly aware of and understands. An appropriate public consultation process will ensure that the opinions of all those impacted are considered when creating changes.

Lack of Required Data to Meet Criteria as per Proposed Legislation

- There is no common definition of “small business” for property assessment/taxation purposes.

- Private legal contractual agreement information and other owner/operator versus tenant data is not available from BC Assessment or other sources except private sources. - A process to validate lease agreements to ensure only those with triple net leases are receiving the exemption is required and there is insufficient time to implement such a policy.

208

Unintended Consequences and Risks

- The proposed permissive exemption that segments the business class on such a short time frame without sufficient public consultation and proper due diligence creates risks for city councils such as potential legal challenges, error and omission in inclusion/exclusion of properties, and undetermined impacts on tax revenues

- Risk of the small businesses, arts culture and non-profit organizations subsidizing big box/chain stores is a major concern. Based on proposed legislation, if a tenant on a triple net lease occupies the same property as a big box store, the entire property would receive the tax exemption due to private legal contractual agreements. However, a small mom-and-pop owner occupied and operated business will not be eligible to receive the exemption. This will result in small owner-operated businesses potentially subsidizing big box stores.

- The original intent was to provide relief to small businesses, arts, culture and non-profit organizations from large increases in property taxes created by development potential. The interim solution risks placing additional tax pressures on some of these properties and ultimately, there is insufficient time to address these risks.

209

TO: Mayor Rob Vagramov, City of Port Moody FROM: Dr. Paul Kench, Dean, Faculty of Science, Simon Fraser University (SFU) DATE: March 3, 2020 SUBJECT: Letter of Intent to Develop an Urban Coastal and Marine Science Centre in Port Moody

Dear Mayor Vagramov,

Thank you for our recent discussions regarding Simon Fraser University’s Faculty of Science and our intent to establish an Urban Coastal and Marine (UCAM) Science Centre located on the waterfront of Port Moody. The vision for the UCAM Science Centre is a capstone project that provides a new and innovative multidisciplinary education program and is the catalyst for both cutting-edge research and engagement of surrounding communities in science focused on the marine environment.

Port Moody has been chosen as our preferred location for the UCAM Science Centre for several reasons. First, the coast and associated marine environment provides a ready-made natural laboratory for our education, research and outreach programmes. Second, the proximity to the Burnaby Campus will allow seamless interaction between our established science support and the new coastal-based facility. Third, the intersection of the urban and natural environment, together with its history of anthropogenic impact, provides the complete suite of science and management issues that will form the substance of our new education program.

The Faculty of Science has engaged in early conceptual planning and strategy development, outlining a vision for the UCAM Science Centre to be a state-of-the art, 100,000 sq. ft. purpose built facility for not only education but world class interdisciplinary research and best-in-class community engagement and outreach. Close proximity and ease of access to Port Moody’s waterfront is crucial for the UCAM Science Centre’s success.

Identifying available land with direct water access to locate the UCAM Science Centre has been challenging, resulting in a secondary vision of the Centre being split – 50,000 sq. ft. of direct waterfront space that will champion bench-to-community research and 50,000 sq. ft. of inland space for provision of our education programme and to house a marine-tech innovation hub with local industry. While this split model is not our preferred option, we believe it may provide some creative opportunities to bridge academic, industry and commercial interests that will benefit the community. Indeed, this split location model has provided many more viable options in terms of available land and ensuring close proximity and ease of access to and from both sites (less than a 10 minute walk) is a main priority and crucial to making this model a success. We would like to stress that we are open to having discussions on all fronts to realize our vision as well as maximize benefit for the City of Port Moody.

Over the past six months SFU Science has met with a variety of stakeholders to illicit support for the UCAM Science Centre. We are pleased to report overwhelming interest in our vision, particularly from key members of the community, industry and land owners in Port Moody’s Transit Oriented District. We intend to continue with stakeholder engagement, consultation and capital development planning 210

throughout 2020 – 2022. Parallel to this we will be finalizing the development of the Urban Coastal and Marine Science undergraduate degree pathway (2021/2022). With partnerships, space and funding secured, design and build of the UCAM Science Centre will take place throughout 2023/2024 with the first cohort to start in 2025.

As a measure of commitment to our new initiative, SFU Science is actively exploring temporary opportunities at Reed Point Marina to provide an immediate home for some of our coastal and marine researchers and their courses.

We are extremely grateful for Port Moody City Council’s interest in our proposal to establish the UCAM Science Centre on the shores of port Moody. We would be happy to engage in close and ongoing dialogue as we move this project forward to fruition. Consequently, the Faculty of Science would be pleased to be included in the city’s Moody Innovation Centre Task Force, should you believe this is appropriate.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Paul Kench Dean, Faculty of Science Professor of Earth Science