DOCSLIB.ORG

Cruise Missile Defense Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MISSILES AND SPACE PROGRAMS fense (IAMD) acquisition approach will en- 114M); and a metal augmented charge sure that the materiel solutions for the (MAC) warhead (AGM-114N) for urban The PEO Missiles and Space provides Army’s AMD Future Force will provide the structures, bunk ers, radar and communica- centralized management for all Army air capabilities required by the warfighter. tions installations, and bridges. and missile defense and tactical missile In 2012, a multipurpose missile (AGM- programs as well as selected Army space Joint Attack Munition Systems 114R) began delivery, which allows the pilot programs. The PEO is responsible for the (JAMS) to select warhead effects corresponding to full life-cycle management of assigned pro- The Joint Attack Munition Systems the target. UAS or rotary-wing platforms grams. (JAMS) Project Office manages all Army can deliver the AGM-114R. The PEO Missiles and Space reports to aviation rockets and missiles. The current The Longbow Hellfire (AGM-114L) is also the Army Acquisition Executive and is programs include the 2.75-inch Hydra 70 a precision-strike missile, but uses millime- aligned with the Aviation and Missile Life family of rockets, the Hellfire family of ter wave (MMW) radar guidance instead of Cycle Management Command at Redstone missiles and the Joint Air-to-Ground Mis- Hellfire II’s SAL. It is the principal antitank Arsenal, Ala. This materiel enterprise rela- sile (JAGM). system for the AH-64D Apache Longbow tionship enhances the PEO’s ability to pro- The 2.75-inch (70 mm) Hydra 70 Rocket and uses the same antiarmor warhead as vide the world’s finest support to our Family encompasses variants of the free- Hellfire II. The MMW seeker provides be- Army, joint service, interagency, and coali- flight rocket that has become the standard yond-line-of-sight fire-and-forget capability tion warfighters and customers while con- ground-attack rocket. The design includes as well as the ability to operate in adverse tinuing the Army’s modernization. multiple warheads that can be used on the weather and battlefield obscurants. The portfolio of programs assigned to rocket motor. During Operation Desert Storm, the Hell- the PEO Missiles and Space spans the full Rockets equipped with various fuzes fire earned a reputation for being one of the spectrum of the acquisition process from and warhead options include: M261 tacti- military’s most formidable tank killers. Its system development to acquisition, testing, cal, M267 practice, M151 (10-pound) anti- multimission capabilities were success- production, product improvement, field- personnel or canopy/soft bunker, M229 fully demonstrated in combat against a ing, sustainment and eventual retirement antipersonnel (17-pound), M274 smoke sig- wide variety of targets, including radar from the force. A number of programs are nature, M257 illumination, M264 smoke, installations, communications posts, bunk- joint programs being developed with the M255A1 flechette, and M278 infrared illu- ers, buildings, antiaircraft emplacements, other services. Two programs within the minating. oil rigs and bridges. Hellfire missiles were PEO are international cooperative develop- The AGM-114 Hellfire Missile Family used extensively in Operation Iraqi Free- ment programs, with other countries shar- includes the Hellfire II and Longbow Hell- dom (OIF) and are in continued use in ing in the development as full partners. fire missiles. Hellfire II is a precision-strike, Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). The In addition to specific acquisition pro- semi-active laser (SAL)-guided missile and Longbow Hellfire missile was used success- grams, the PEO is applying a system-of- is the principal air-to-ground weapon for fully in combat for the first time during OIF. systems acquisition approach to meet the Army AH-64 Apache, the U.S. Marine The Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM) warfighters’ needs and obtain the desired Corps AH-1W Super Cobra and the U.S. program will provide a rotary-wing, fixed- capabilities of the Army Air and Missile De- Air Force Predator unmanned aircraft sys- wing and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)- fense (AMD) Future Force. This approach tem (UAS). launched missile system that provides line- requires the systems to be restructured into The SAL Hellfire II guides using laser of-sight capabilities, including precision components of sensors, launchers, missiles, energy reflected off the target. It has three point targeting (both active and passive) and Battle Management Command, Con- warhead variants: a dual warhead, shaped- and fire-and-forget seeker technologies; in- trol, Communications, Computers and In- charge high-explosive antitank (HEAT) for creased range; and increased lethality against telligence (BMC4I), utilizing a standard set armored threats (AGM-114K); a blast-frag- soft and hardened moving and stationary of interfaces and networks to communicate. mentation warhead (BFWH) for urban, pa- targets. When fielded, the JAGM will re- The Army’s Integrated Air and Missile De- trol boat and other “soft” targets (AGM- place aviation-launched TOW, the Hellfire family of missiles and the Navy’s Maverick family of missiles. The JAGM will increase the warfighter’s operational flexibility by effectively engaging a variety of station - ary and mobile targets on the battlefield, in- cluding advanced heavy/light armored ve- hicles, bunkers, buildings, patrol craft, com- mand-and-control vehicles, trans porter/ erector launchers, artillery sys tems and radar/air defense systems. Its multimode seeker will provide robust capability in ad- verse weather, day or night, and in an ob- scured/countermeasure environment, against both stationary and moving targets. Cruise Missile Defense Systems (CMDS) The CMDS Project Office is equipping the transformation of the current force ma- neuver air and missile defense capability into an integrated air and missile defense capability. Programs include Stinger-based Avenger A Hellfire Missile is loaded onto an AH-64D Apache helicopter. and Manportable Air Defense System 326 ARMY I October 2012 (MAN PADS), the Sentinel radar and the Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System (JLENS). Stinger-based Avenger and MANPADS provide the only air defense weapon cur- rently in the forward area through Stinger, a fire-and-forget infrared/ultraviolet (IR/UV) missile system. Stinger-based Avenger is highly mobile and provides shoot-on-the- move capabilities in day, night, and adverse weather operations, and is designed to counter hostile, low-flying unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), cruise missiles, rotary- wing aircraft and high-performance fixed- wing aircraft. Stinger provides low-altitude defense for ground forces against aerial observation or attack by smaller threat aircraft. Stinger missiles have extensive counter-counter- measure capabilities, can engage targets from any aspect including head-on, and uti- lize a high-explosive, hit-to-kill warhead. Stinger-based Avenger mounted on a Humvee The AN/MPQ-64 Sentinel is an ad- vanced, three dimensional, battlefield X- The Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Lower Tier Project Office band air defense phased-array radar with Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System The Lower Tier Project Office consists of an acquisition range of 40 kilometers. Sen- (JLENS) uses advanced sensor and net- the Patriot, PAC-3 and Joint Tactical tinel transmits its radar imagery to the for- working technologies to provide 360-de- Ground Station (JTAGS). ward area air defense command and con- gree, wide-area surveillance and precision The Patriot Missile System provides de- trol (FAAD C2) via radio frequency link. tracking of land attack cruise missiles. fense of critical assets and maneuver forces Sentinel is being upgraded to the im- JLENS detects stressing, terrain-masked belonging to corps and to echelons above proved Sentinel configuration that doubles cruise missiles and other air-breathing corps against aircraft, cruise missiles and its range and will integrate with future threats, permitting extended engagement tactical ballistic missiles (TBMs). The PAC-2 AMD BMC4I via SLAMRAAM. ranges for current air defense systems. system upgrade, modified PAC-2 guidance October 2012 I ARMY 327 enhancement missiles (GEM) and the PAC-3 to increase performance against an evolving communications (C2BMC); and THAAD- missile provide the Patriot missile system threat, meets user needs and enhances joint specific support equipment. All compo- with an advanced antitactical missile capa- interoperability. nents were successfully integrated, tested bility. The combat element of the Patriot The Joint Tactical Ground Station (JTAGS) and demonstrated during the first pro- missile system is the fire unit, which con- is a transportable information processing gram phase that concluded in 2000. sists of a phased-array radar set (RS), an en- system that supports combatant comman- The THAAD development program gagement control station (ECS), an electric ders and forward-deployed forces with flight testing resumed in 2005 with the first power plant, an antenna mast group, a com- early warning data on ballistic missile 15 flight tests. In May 2006, Lockheed Mar- munications relay group and up to eight re- launches. tin and the U.S. Missile Defense Agency motely located launching stations (LSs). The Missile Defense Agency-managed successfully conducted the first develop- The RS provides all tactical functions of Terminal High Altitude Area Defense mental flight test to engage the entire airspace surveillance,
Recommended publications
  • EURASIA Russian Heavy Artillery

    EURASIA Russian Heavy Artillery

    EURASIA Russian Heavy Artillery: Leaving Depots and Returning to Service OE Watch Commentary: The Soviet Union developed large caliber artillery, such as the 2S4 ‘Tyulpan’ 240mm mortar and the 2S7 ‘Pion’ 203mm howitzer, to suppress lines of communication, destroy enemy headquarters, tactical nuclear weapons, logistic areas, and other important targets and to destroy urban areas and field fortifications. After the end of the Cold War, the Russian Federation placed most of these large caliber artillery systems into long-term storage depots for several reasons. The first is that they were intended to deliver nuclear, as well as conventional, munitions (the end of the Cold War meant that a long-range tactical nuclear weapon delivery was no longer needed). Another reason is that better tube (2S19M Msta-SM) and missile (MLRS/SRBM/GLCM) systems, such as new 300mm MLRS platforms, the Iskander missile system, and the 2S19M Msta-SM 152mm howitzer, allow Russia to fulfill many of the same tasks as large caliber artillery to varying degrees. The 2S4 ‘Tyulpan’ self-propelled mortar is equipped with a 240mm 2B8 mortar mounted on a modified Object 123 tracked chassis (similar to the 2S3 Akatsiya self-propelled howitzer) with a V-59 V-12, 520 horsepower diesel engine, capable of 60 km/h road speed. The Tyulpan has a crew of four, but five additional crewman are carried in the support vehicle that typically accompanies it. The system is capable of firing conventional, chemical, and nuclear munitions at a rate of one round per minute, although Russia reportedly now only has conventional munitions in service.

  • The Army's New Multiple Rocket Launcher-A Shining Example of A

    The Army's New Multiple Rocket Launcher-A Shining Example of a Weapon That Works The military forces of the United States and its NATO partners have no hope nor intention of matching the Warsaw Pact gun-for-gun or tank­ for-tank. Instead we and our allies plan to rely from the onset of hostil­ ities in Europe on tactics and weapons which would blunt the initial attack and deliver a knockout blow to the Soviet second echelon forces before they could exploit any initial success. To give our Army the wherewithal to fight a numerically superior foe­ and win, we have organized and trained balanced ground fighting forces capable of successful combat against any army in the world. Of equal import, we are providing our soldiers with the weap­ ons and equipment to exhibit a credi­ ble deterrence to war-armaments like the M1 Abrams tank and its compan­ ion, the Bradley infantry fighting ve­ hicle, the AH-64 Apache attack heli­ copter and the UH -60 utility helicopter. In addition the Army is quietly field­ ing another new system that could provide the firepower edge our sol­ diers need. That weapon is the Multi­ ple Launch Rocket System (MLRS), and it is described by the general in charge of Army research and develop­ ment as "the best piece of equipment that we have fielded for close support of the battlefield since World War II." The MLRS is a highly reliable, ex­ tremely accurate field artillery rocket system with which three soldiers can deliver the volume of firepower that would normally require nearly a bat­ talion of heavy artillery.
  • Protecting Commercial Aviation Against the Shoulder-Fired Missile

    Protecting Commercial Aviation Against the Shoulder-Fired Missile

    INFRASTRUCTURE, SAFETY, AND ENVIRONMENT THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public CHILD POLICY service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION Jump down to document ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and effective PUBLIC SAFETY solutions that address the challenges facing the public SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Infrastructure, Safety, and Environment View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. This product is part of the RAND Corporation occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, a conference summary, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers
  • Rebel Forces in Northern Mali

    Rebel Forces in Northern Mali

    REBEL FORCES IN NORTHERN MALI Documented weapons, ammunition and related materiel April 2012-March 2013 Co-published online by Conflict Armament Research and the Small Arms Survey © Conflict Armament Research/Small Arms Survey, London/Geneva, 2013 First published in April 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing of Conflict Armament Research and the Small Arms Survey, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organisation. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the secretary, Conflict Armament Research ([email protected]) or the secretary, Small Arms Survey ([email protected]). Copy-edited by Alex Potter ([email protected]) Reviewed by Alex Diehl and Nic Jenzen-Jones Cover image: © Joseph Penny, 2013 Above image: Design and layout by Julian Knott (www.julianknott.com) © Richard Valdmanis, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS About 4 3.7 M40 106 mm recoilless gun 11 Abbreviations and acronyms 5 4. Light Weapons Ammunition 12 Introduction 6 4.1 12.7 x 108 mm ammunition 12 4.2 14.5 x 115 mm ammunition 12 1. Small Arms 7 4.3 PG-7 rockets 13 1.1 Kalashnikov-pattern 7.62 x 39 mm assault 4.4 OG-82 and PG-82 rockets 13 rifles 7 4.5 82 mm mortar bombs 14 1.2 FN FAL-pattern 7.62 x 51 mm rifle 7 4.6 120 mm mortar bombs 14 1.3 G3-pattern 7.62 x 51 mm rifle 7 4.7 Unidentified nose fuzes 14 1.4 MAT-49 9 x 19 mm sub-machine gun 7 4.8 F1-pattern fragmentation grenades 15 1.5 RPD-pattern 7.62 x 39 mm light 4.9 NR-160 106 mm HEAT projectiles 15 machine gun 7 1.6 PK-pattern 7.62 x 54R mm general-purpose 5.
  • Northrop F-5 E/F, CF-5D

    Northrop F-5 E/F, CF-5D

    Northrop F-5 E/F, CF-5D Description The F-5E is a single seat, twin-engine, tactical fighter and attack aircraft. providing simulated air-to-air combat training, close-air support training, tactics development and evaluation support, manufactured by Northrop Grumman Corporation. The F-5F is a dual-seat version, twin-engine, tactical fighter commonly used for training and adversary combat tactics. The aircraft can ably serve in an aggressor training role with simulation capability of current threat aircraft in fighter combat mode. The CF-FD is the dual-seat Canadian version of the F-5 modified to fit specific Canadian requirements. Fleet TacAir owns and operates a fleet of 26 supersonic F-5 fighter aircraft, largely consisting of an improved, lower flight-time version of the current Adversary platform of the U.S. Navy (USN) and Marine Corps (USMC). TacAir has operated F-5 aircraft since 2013. The F-5 is a proven Adversary aircraft also formerly used by the USAF in this role and currently operational with 19 international air forces. While the baseline F-5 flown by USN/USMC is widely considered a 3rd Generation aircraft, TacAir’s existing and planned upgrades economically evolve this aircraft into an advanced tactical aircraft with sensor/system capabilities on par with current DoD 4th Generation fighter aircraft. TacAir F-5s are upgraded with HUD/HOTAS, open architecture mission computers and tailored Operational Flight Programs that enable integration of advanced radar systems, IRSTS, EA, RWR, datalinks, and HOBS simulated weapons employment. TheF-5’s proven growth potential and twin engine reliability, paired with our uncompromising corporate safety culture, is the best insurance against hazards and mishaps, and lets us meet almost any potential performance requirements.
  • Fighting Vehicle Technology

    Fighting Vehicle Technology

    Fighting Vehicle Technology 41496_DSTA 60-77#150Q.indd 1 5/6/10 12:44 AM ABSTRACT Armoured vehicle technology has evolved ever since the first tanks appeared in World War One. The traditional Armoured Fighting Vehicle (AFV) design focuses on lethality, survivability and mobility. However, with the growing reliance on communications and command (C2) systems, there is an increased need for the AFV design to be integrated with the vehicle electronics, or vetronics. Vetronics has become a key component of the AFV’s effectiveness on the battlefield. An overview of the technology advances in these areas will be explored. In addition, the impact on the human aspect as a result of these C2 considerations will be covered. Tan Chuan-Yean Mok Shao Hong Vince Yew 41496_DSTA 60-77#150Q.indd 2 5/6/10 12:44 AM Fighting Vehicle Technology 62 and more advanced sub-systems will raise the INTRODUCTION question of how the modern crew is able to process and use the information effectively. On the modern battlefield, armies are moving towards Network-Centric Warfare TECHNOLOGIES IN AN (NCW). Forces no longer fight as individual entities but as part of a larger system. Each AFV entity becomes a node in a network where information can be shared, and firepower can Firepower be called upon request. AFVs are usually equipped with weapon Key to this network fighting capability is the stations for self-protection and the communications and command (C2) system. engagement of targets. Depending on By enabling each force to be plugged into the threat, some are equipped with pintle the C2 system, information can be shared mount systems for light weapons (e.g.
  • IB-220 Appraisal-Of-PLA-Artillery

    IB-220 Appraisal-Of-PLA-Artillery

    D W LAN ARFA CENTRE FOR LAND WARFARE STUDOR RE IES F S E T R U T D N IE E S C CLAWS VI CT N O SIO 31 CLAWS RY VI D W THROUGH LAN ARFA OR RE F S E T R U T D N IE E S C CLAWS VI CT N OR ISIO Y THROUGH V ISSUE BRIEF No. 220 April 2020 Brig Vivek Verma is Former Deputy Director, Appraisal of Centre for Land Warfare Studies and Senior D W Research Fellow, USI of India, New Delhi. LAN ARFA PLA ArtilleryOR RE F S ModernisationE T R U T D Trigger forN China’s Artillery Modernisation IE China hasE been closely monitoring American Key Points S and RussianC doctrinal and weapon modernisation programmes. It is looking to counter them through either asymmetric means or by building matching capabilities. 1. 2014 Russo-Ukrainian conflict demonstrated Hu Jintao initiated the “New Historic effectiveness of artillery in a hostile electronic Missions” in 2004 based on the lessons of environment. foreign intervention during 1995-96 Taiwan- 2. It reaffirmed Chinese artillery development plan Strait crisis and 2003 Gulf War. The mission as it realised that it can outgun the US military, its directed People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to peer competitor, in this area. develop a range of systems to deter and deny foreign force projections. The 2019 white paper 3. Taiwan and Tibet contingencies form the basis of on “China’s National Defence in New Era” PLA artillery modernisation drive. talks about preparation for military struggle 4.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 241/Monday, December 16, 2019

    Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 241/Monday, December 16, 2019

    Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2019 / Notices 68431 (MWS), one (1) Control Indicator Unit integration; hardware integration; flight Replacement (LSPR), Control Indicator Replacement (CIUR), one (1) Smart Card test and certifications; selective Unit Replacement (CIUR), and a Assembly (SCA), and one (1) High availability anti-spoofing modules classified User Data Memory (UDM) Capacity Card (HCC/User Data Memory (SAASM); publications and technical card containing the laser jam codes. The (UDM) card. documentation; training and training UDM card is loaded into the LSPR prior Major Defense Equipment (MDE): equipment; field service representatives; to flight; when not in use, the UDM card Twelve (12) Guardian Laser Turret U.S. Government and contractor is removed from the LSRP and put in Assemblies (GLTA) (6 installed, 6 engineering, technical, and logistics secure storage. The Missile Warning spares) support; and other related elements of Sensors (MWS) for AN/AAQ-24(V)N are Seven (7) LAIRCM System Processor logistics and program support. The mounted on the aircraft exterior to Replacements (LSPR) (2 installed 5 estimated cost is $86 million. provide omni-directional protection. spares) This proposed sale will support the The MWS detects the rocket plume of Twenty-three (23) Missile Warning foreign policy and national security of missiles and sends appropriate data Sensors (MWS) (10 installed, 13 the United States by helping to improve signals to the LSPR for processing. The spares) the security of a friendly country that LSPR analyzes the data from each continues to be an important force for Non-MDE: Also included are LAIRCM sensor and automatically deploys the political and economic progress in the CIURs; SCAs; HCCs; UDM cards; initial appropriate countermeasure via the Middle East.
  • ITEM 2 Complete Subsystems Complete

    ITEM 2 Complete Subsystems Complete

    ITEM 2 Complete Subsystems Complete CATEGORY I ~ ITEM 2 CATEGORY Subsystems Complete subsystems usable in the systems in Item 1, as follows, as well Produced by as the specially designed “production facilities” and “production equip- companies in ment” therefor: (a) Individual rocket stages; • Brazil • China Nature and Purpose: A rocket stage generally consists of structure, engine/ • Egypt motor, propellant, and some elements of a control system. Rocket engines or • France motors produce propulsive thrust to make the rocket fly by using either solid • Germany propellants, which burn to exhaustion once ignited, or liquid propellants • India burned in a combustion chamber fed by pressure tanks or pumps. • Iran • Iraq Method of Operation: A launch signal either fires an igniter in the solid • Israel propellant inside the lowermost (first stage) rocket motor, or tank pressure • Italy or a pump forces liquid propellants into the combustion chamber of a • Japan rocket engine where they react. Expanding, high-temperature gases escape • Libya at high speeds through a nozzle at the rear of the rocket stage. The mo- • North Korea mentum of the exhausting gases provides the thrust for the missile. Multi- • Pakistan stage rocket systems discard the lower stages as they burn up their propel- • Russia lant and progressively lose weight, thereby achieving greater range than • South Korea comparably sized, single-stage rocket systems. • Syria • Ukraine Typical Missile-Related Uses: Rocket stages are necessary components of any • United Kingdom rocket system. Rocket stages also are used in missile and missile-component • United States testing applications. Photo Credit: Chemical Propulsion Information Agency Other Uses: N/A Appearance (as manufactured): Solid propellant rocket motor stages are cylinders usually ranging from 4 to 10 m in length and 0.5 to 4 m in diame- ter, and capped at each end with hemispherical domes as shown in Figure 2-1.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 71/Tuesday, April 14, 2015/Notices

    Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 71/Tuesday, April 14, 2015/Notices

    Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices 19967 ending at 5:30 p.m. each day, or as national visitors should contact Dr. Jim 16 to the Northeast Multispecies Fishery necessary to complete business. The Hastie at (206) 860–3412 at least 2 Management Plan, in conjunction with Panel will adjourn on Friday, July 31. weeks prior to the meeting date to Final Rule 0648–BE75. The information The locations of the meetings are as initiate the security clearance process. collection currently approved under follows: OMB Control No. 0648–0605 includes a Special Accommodations The STAR Panel for canary rockfish number of reporting requirements and darkblotched rockfish will be held This meeting is physically accessible necessary to end overfishing, rebuild the Hotel Deca, 4507 Brooklyn Avenue to people with disabilities. Requests for overfished groundfish stocks, and NE., Seattle, WA 98105; telephone: sign language interpretation or other mitigate the adverse economic impacts (206) 634–2000. auxiliary aids should be directed to Mr. of increased effort controls. This The STAR Panel for the bocaccio and Kris Kleinschmidt at (503) 820–2425 at revision proposes to modify only the China rockfish stock assessments will be least 5 days prior to the meeting date. broad stock area reporting requirements held at the NMFS, Southwest Fisheries Dated: April 8, 2015. currently approved under the Science Center, Santa Cruz Laboratory, Information Collection for Amendment 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA William D. Chappell, Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable 16. We are seeking comments on a 95060; telephone: (831) 420–3900. provision that, if approved, would The STAR Panels for the black Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
  • Robert H. Goddard – NASA Facts

    Robert H. Goddard – NASA Facts

    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 301-286-8955 FS-2001-03-017-GSFC Robert H. Goddard: American Rocket Pioneer The father of modern rocket propulsion is the American, Dr. Robert Hutchings Goddard. Along with Konstantin Eduordovich Tsiolkovsky of Russia and Hermann Oberth of Germany, Goddard envisioned the exploration of space. A physicist of great insight, Goddard also had an unique genius for invention. By 1926, Goddard had constructed and tested successfully the first rocket using liquid fuel. Indeed, the flight of Goddard's rocket on March 16,1926, at Auburn, Massachusetts, was a feat as epochal in history as that of the Wright brothers at Kitty Hawk. Yet, it was one of Goddard's "firsts" in the now boom- ing significance of rocket propulsion in the fields of military missilery and the scientific exploration of space. Primitive in their day as the achievement of the Wrights, Goddard's rockets made little impression upon government officials. Only through the modest subsidies of the Smithsonian Institution and the Daniel Guggenheim Foundation, as well as the leaves of absence granted him by Worcester Polytechnic Institute of Clark University, was Goddard able to sustain his lifetime of devoted research and testing. He worked for the U.S. Navy in both World Wars. Eighteen years after his suc- cessful demonstration at Auburn, Goddard's pioneering achievements came to life in the German V-2 ballistic missile. Goddard first obtained public notice in 1907 in a cloud of smoke from a powder rocket fired in the basement of the physics build- ing in Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 104 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION

    Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 104 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 104 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 142 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, JANUARY 22, 1996 No. 7 House of Representatives The House met at 2 p.m. and was come forward and lead the House in the JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESSÐ called to order by the Speaker pro tem- Pledge of Allegiance. STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS pore [Mr. EVERETT]. Mr. SMITH of Texas led the Pledge of The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- f Allegiance as follows: fore the House a Senate concurrent res- DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the olution (S. Con. Res. 39), which was United States of America, and to the Repub- read by the Clerk, as follows: PRO TEMPORE lic for which it stands, one nation under God, S. CON. RES. 39 The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. fore the House the following commu- Resolved by the Senate (the House of Rep- f resentatives concurring), That the two Houses nication from the Speaker: MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT of Congress assemble in the Hall of the WASHINGTON, DC, House of Representatives on Tuesday, Janu- January 22, 1996. A message in writing from the Presi- ary 23, 1996, at 9 p.m., for the purpose of re- I hereby designate the Honorable Terry Ev- dent of the United States was commu- ceiving such communication as the Presi- erett to act as Speaker pro tempore on this nicated to the House by Mr.