October 2019 Report No 4740/01-1 ALLINGTON EFW PROPOSED

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

October 2019 Report No 4740/01-1 ALLINGTON EFW PROPOSED October 2019 Report No 4740/01-1 ALLINGTON EFW PROPOSED EXTENSION PHASE 1 DESK STUDY REPORT Carried out for: FCC ENVIRONMENT (UK) LTD Lead Consultant: AXIS P.E.D LTD ALLINGTON EFW PROPOSED EXTENSION PHASE 1 DESK STUDY REPORT Date: 10/10/2019 Report No 4740/01-1 Prepared for: Lead Consult: Prepared by: FCC Environment AXIS P.E.D Ltd TerraConsult Ltd. (UK) Ltd Camellia House Bold Business Centre Granville House 76 Water Lane Bold Lane, Sutton St Georges Road Wilmslow St. Helens, Merseyside Donnington Wood Cheshire WA9 4TX Telford, SK9 5BB Shropshire Telephone: 01925 TF2 7RA 291111 www.terraconsult.co.uk Phase 1 Geo-Environmental Assessment Allington EfW Proposed Extension, Allington. DOCUMENT INFORMATION AND CONTROL SHEET Document Status and Approval Schedule Report No. Title 4740/01 ALLINGTON EFWPROPOSED EXTENSION PHASE 1 DESKSTUDY REPORT Issue History Issue Status Date Contributors Signature Date 1 For Use 10/10/2019 Prepared By: N Anson 04/10/2019 N Anson BE(Civil) Reviewed & Approved By: L. Stock 10/10/2019 L. Stock MiEnvSc CSci DISCLAIMER This report should be read with the Service Constraints Report Limitations & Planning Requirements set out in Appendix A. October 2019 Report No. 4740/01 Issue 1 Phase 1 Geo-Environmental Assessment Allington EfW Proposed Extension, Allington. ALLINGTON EFWPROPOSED EXTENSION PHASE 1 DESK STUDY REPORT CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background Information ........................................................................................... 1 1.2. Development Proposals ........................................................................................... 1 1.3. Planning Status & Requirements ............................................................................ 3 1.4. Scope of the Investigation ........................................................................................ 3 2. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION............................................................................. 4 2.1 Site Location............................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Site Description .......................................................................................................... 5 2.3 History ......................................................................................................................... 6 3. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................................................................ 7 3.1 Data Summary ........................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Geology ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Mining and Quarrying ............................................................................................... 7 3.4 Hydrology, Flooding and Drainage ......................................................................... 8 3.5 Hydrogeology ............................................................................................................. 8 3.6 Industrial, Ecological, and Historical Use .............................................................. 9 5. CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL AND PRELIMINARY QUALITATIVE HAZARD ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................................ 18 5.1 Hazards Identified with the Proposed Extension ................................................ 18 5.2 Potential Sources of Contamination ..................................................................... 18 5.3 Potential Receptors of Contamination ................................................................. 19 5.4 Identification Pathways ........................................................................................... 19 5.5 Contaminant Linkages ............................................................................................ 21 5.6 Conceptual Site model ........................................................................................... 22 5.7 Preliminary Contamination Hazard Assessment ................................................ 24 5.8 Geotechnical Hazards Associated with the Development ................................ 26 6. CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................... 28 6.1 Environmental Risk Assessment .......................................................................... 28 6.2 Geotechnical Risk Assessment............................................................................. 28 6.3 Recommendations for Further Work .................................................................... 29 6.4 Regulatory Liaison................................................................................................... 30 6.5 Health and Safety .................................................................................................... 30 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................ 31 APPENDICES Appendix A Service Constraints, Report Limitations & Planning Requirements Appendix B Environmental Risk Assessment Methodology and Terminology Appendix C Photographs Appendix D GroundSure EnviroInsite Report Appendix E Ground Gas Risk Assessment & Possible Mitigation October 2019 Report No. 4740/01 Issue 1 Phase 1 Geo-Environmental Assessment Allington EfW Proposed Extension, Allington ALLINGTON EFW PROPOSED EXTENSION PHASE 1 DESKSTUDY REPORT 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Information 1.1.1 TerraConsult Limited was commissioned by Axis PED Ltd to carry out a preliminary site investigation on behalf of FCC Environment (UK) Ltd (FCC) for an area of land adjacent to the Existing Station in Kent, which shares the Project Site with the Proposed Extension. The purpose of the report is to provide information on conditions at the site for a proposed new EfW plant, hereafter referred to as the Proposed Extension. 1.1.2 This report has been devised to generally comply with the relevant principles and requirements of a range of guidance including: Part IIA of the Environment Protection Act, 1990; Contaminated Land (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2012 and Contaminated Land Statutory Guidance (DEFRA, April 2012); NPPF 2019 ‘National Planning Policy Framework’ BS5930:2015: “Code of practice for site investigations”; BS10175: 2011 +A2:2017 “Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Sites - Code of Practice”; DEFRA/Environment Agency (2004) Report CLR11 “Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination”; Environment Agency (2011) Report GPLC1 “Guiding Principles for Land Contamination”; and, Environment Agency (2013) Report GP3 “Groundwater protection: Principles and Practice” Version 1.1. 1.1.3 TerraConsult’s service constraints and report limitations are presented in Appendix A and a description of environmental risk assessment methodology and terminology is presented in Appendix B. 1.2. Development Proposals 1.2.1 The Proposed Extension is understood to comprise: the removal of existing vegetation; the removal from site or the treatment of any contaminated material encountered during demolition; the levelling and profiling of site area (including significant re-profiling of the existing soil bunds); The construction of a new EfW plant; Proposed Extension, including; the main plant (with associated bunkers and tipping areas etc.), electrical substation, attenuation lagoon, district heating centre, construction laydown area, car parking and access roadways. Further details are listed below. October 2019 Report No. 4740/01 Issue 1 Page 1 of 31 Phase 1 Geo-Environmental Assessment Allington EfW Proposed Extension, Allington 1.2.2 A plan of the Proposed Extension is presented in Figure 1 below: N Figure 1: Plan of Proposed Extension as provided by the Client (not to scale) 1.2.3 Key features of the Proposed Extension include: Main plant area situated centrally on Figure 1 above (comprising of a turbine hall, a furnace hall, a waste bunker and ash bunker, waste processing, boilers plus an 80m vent stack; Attenuation Lagoon situated towards the northwest corner of the site; Access roadways running north to south adjacent the main plant area and towards the east from the southeast corner of the main plant area; Car parking space to the north of the main plant area on the northern boundary of the site; District Heating Centre directly to the northwest of the main plant area; Maintenance Contractors Compound situated directly to the north of the main plant area; and, Construction laydown area situated directly to the west of the main plant area and along the western site boundary. 1.2.4 The findings and conclusions of the risk assessments have been set out and recommendations given for the proposed industrial end use. If there is a subsequent October 2019 Report No. 4740/01 Issue 1 Page 2 of 31 Phase 1 Geo-Environmental Assessment Allington EfW Proposed Extension, Allington change in the proposed land the risk assessments and conclusions should be reviewed to determine whether they are still applicable for the revised end use. 1.3. Planning Status & Requirements 1.3.1 This Proposed Extension is to be undertaken via development consent order (DCO) which is exempt of planning control but still employs strict
Recommended publications
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Area 3 Planning Committee, 19/11/2020 18:30
    Public Document Pack TONBRIDGE & MALLING BOROUGH COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SERVICES Gibson Building Chief Executive Gibson Drive Julie Beilby BSc (Hons) MBA Kings Hill, West Malling Kent ME19 4LZ West Malling (01732) 844522 NB - This agenda contains proposals, Contact: Democratic Services recommendations and options. These do [email protected] not represent Council policy or decisions 11 November 2020 until they have received proper consideration through the full decision making process. To: MEMBERS OF THE AREA 3 PLANNING COMMITTEE (Copies to all Members of the Council) Dear Sir/Madam Your attendance is requested at a meeting of the Area 3 Planning Committee to be held online via Microsoft Teams on Thursday, 19th November, 2020 commencing at 6.30 pm. Information on how to observe the meeting will be published on the Council’s website. Deposited plans can be viewed online by using Public Access. Please note the earlier start time. Yours faithfully JULIE BEILBY Chief Executive A G E N D A PART 1 - PUBLIC 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Declarations of Interest Members in any doubt about such declarations are advised to contact Legal or Democratic Services in advance of the meeting 3. Minutes 5 - 8 To confirm as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting of Area 3 Planning Committee held on 1 October 2020 Decisions to be taken by the Committee 4. Development Control 9 - 12 Introduction and Glossary 5. TM/18/02966/0A - Development Site South of Brampton Field 13 - 76 between Bradbourne Lane and Kiln Barn Road, Ditton Outline Application: Development of the site to provide up to 300 dwellings (Use Class C3) and provision of new access off Kiln Barn Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Strategy Topic Paper for Pre-Submission Local Plan
    Tunbridge Wells Borough Council Development Strategy Topic Paper for Pre-Submission Local Plan February 2021 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Settlement pattern ............................................................................................ 2 3.0 Environmental designations ............................................................................. 4 High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty .................................................... 4 Metropolitan Green Belt .......................................................................................... 5 Nature Conservation designations .......................................................................... 6 Heritage designations ............................................................................................. 7 Areas of flood risk ................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Development needs ......................................................................................... 9 Housing .................................................................................................................. 9 Business ................................................................................................................. 9 Retail .....................................................................................................................10 5.0 Development of the strategy through previous
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Assessment of Kent 2004
    CHILHAM: STOUR VALLEY Location map: CHILHAMCHARACTER AREA DESCRIPTION North of Bilting, the Stour Valley becomes increasingly enclosed. The rolling sides of the valley support large arable fields in the east, while sweeps of parkland belonging to Godmersham Park and Chilham Castle cover most of the western slopes. On either side of the valley, dense woodland dominate the skyline and a number of substantial shaws and plantations on the lower slopes reflect the importance of game cover in this area. On the valley bottom, the river is picked out in places by waterside alders and occasional willows. The railway line is obscured for much of its length by trees. STOUR VALLEY Chilham lies within the larger character area of the Stour Valley within the Kent Downs AONB. The Great Stour is the most easterly of the three rivers cutting through the Downs. Like the Darent and the Medway, it too provided an early access route into the heart of Kent and formed an ancient focus for settlement. Today the Stour Valley is highly valued for the quality of its landscape, especially by the considerable numbers of walkers who follow the Stour Valley Walk or the North Downs Way National Trail. Despite its proximity to both Canterbury and Ashford, the Stour Valley retains a strong rural identity. Enclosed by steep scarps on both sides, with dense woodlands on the upper slopes, the valley is dominated by intensively farmed arable fields interspersed by broad sweeps of mature parkland. Unusually, there are no electricity pylons cluttering the views across the valley. North of Bilting, the river flows through a narrow, pastoral floodplain, dotted with trees such as willow and alder and drained by small ditches.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Cycle Study - Outline Report June 2010
    Maidstone Borough Council Water Cycle Study - Outline Report June 2010 Halcrow Group Limited Maidstone Borough Council Water Cycle Study – Outline Report June 2010 Halcrow Group Limited Halcrow Group Limited Griffin House 135 High Street Crawley West Sussex RH10 1DQ Tel +44 (0)1293 434500 Fax +44 (0)1293 434599 www.halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their client, , for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. © Halcrow Group Limited 2010 Halcrow Group Limited Griffin House 135 High Street Crawley West Sussex RH10 1DQ Tel +44 (0)1293 434500 Fax +44 (0)1293 434599 www.halcrow.com Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Revision Description Date Signed 1 - Draft for Consultation 29 Sept. 2009 PM 1 1 Revised Draft for 19 Oct. 2009 PM Consultation 1 2 Revised Draft for 23 Oct. 2009 PM Consultation 1 3 Minor modifications to 25 Nov 2009 SAW Revised Draft for Consultation 2 - Final 11 Feb 2010 SAW 2 1 Minor amendments in 22 March SAW response to client 2010 comments 2 2 Minor amendments in 2 June 2010 PM response to client comments Contents 1 Executive Summary 1-1 2 Introduction 2-1 2.1 Study Area 2-1 2.2 What is a Water Cycle Study? 2-2 2.3 Scoping Stage of Water Cycle Study 2-4 3 Planning Background 3-1 3.1 Regional Planning Strategy 3-1 3.2 Local Development Framework 3-2 3.3 Environmental Context 3-9 3.4 Water Framework Directive 3-14 3.5 Habitat Directive 3-15
    [Show full text]
  • Download: 6. Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council
    Appendix E Updated Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) E001 E002 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council E003 Mott MacDonald Mott MacDonald House 8-10 Sydenham Road Croydon CR0 2EE United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 8774 2000 F +44 (0)20 8681 5706 mottmac.com Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council Gibson Drive Tonbridge and Malling Kings Hill 323860 001 C West Malling ME19 4LZ Borough Mott MacDonald Council Habitats Regulations Assessment January 2019September 2020 Mott MacDonald Group Limited. Registered in England and Wales no. 1110949. Registered office: Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council Croydon CR0 2EE, United Kingdom E004 Mott MacDonald | Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Habitats Regulations Assessment Issue and Revision Record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description DraftA 11/01/19 SW KA SM First Issue Second 22/01/19 SW KA CM Second Issue issueB Third IssueC 2930/01/19 SW CM CM Third Issue D 11/03/2020 SW SM CM Updated following NE comments E 30/07/2020 SW SM CM Updated following NE comments F 10/09/2020 CM JB CM Final Document reference: 323860 | 001 | F Information class: Standard This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above- captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Motorways Programme M20 Junction 3 to 5 Smart Motorway
    Smart Motorways Programme M20 J3-5 Smart Motorways Programme M20 Junction 3 to 5 Smart Motorway: Environmental Study Report February 2017 Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Highways England’s information and use in relation to the Smart Motorways Programme. in partnership with 1 Smart Motorways Programme M20 J3-5 Table of contents Pages Table of contents 2 Executive summary 5 1. Introduction 8 1.1. Overview of the Proposed Scheme 8 1.2. Purpose of the this Environmental Study Report 8 1.3. Background to the Smart Motorways Programme 9 1.4. The Road Investment Strategy and Highways England Licence 10 1.5. Regulatory Framework 14 1.6. Guidance followed for this report 14 2. The Proposed Scheme 15 2.1. Need for the Proposed Scheme 15 2.2. Description of the Proposed Scheme 15 2.3. Carriageways 16 2.4. Central reserve works 16 2.5. Verge / ALR works 16 2.6. Emergency refuge areas 18 2.7. Signs and gantries 19 2.8. Lighting 20 2.9. Works to Structures 21 2.10. Communication cabling and ducting 21 2.11. Environmental barriers 22 2.12. Site clearance 22 2.13. Construction, operation and long term management 22 2.14. Planned Development and overlapping schemes 23 2.15. Land use setting and land take 23 2.16. Proposed Scheme delivery and implementation 24 2.17. Proposed operation and long term management 24 3. Alternatives considered 25 3.1. Programme level alternatives 25 3.2. Scheme-specific alternatives 25 4. Environmental Impact Assessment Methodology 28 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kent County 345 Painter’S X Harbledown 11 Wildlife 43 Sandwich Gazen Salts Nature Reserve Joydens Wood
    To St. Pancras International To Barking To Upminster To Southend INDEX TO PLACES SERVED A and London B and London C and Shoeburyness D E F G H J K L M Rainham A Great Easthall .............................. G2 Playden......................................... G7 Acol ................................................L2 Great Mongeham....................... M4 Pluckley........................................ G5 Addington..................................... D3 Greatness..................................... B3 Plucks Gutter................................L3 London Riv Adisham........................................ K4 Greatstone-on-sea ......................J7 Plumstead .................................... A1 City Airport King er Tham Becket Sports Centre Airfield Estate .............................. D4 Grebe Crescent ............................J6 Poplar Drive ..................................J2 West es Silvertown George V Central Park Alderbrook ................................... B7 Greenfields....................................J5 Port Lympne..................................J6 Central Park Athletics Track Aldington ...................................... H6 Greenhill ........................................J2 Potten Street.................................L2 Dartford Borough Museum Aldington Frith ............................. H6 Greenhithe ................................... C1 Potters Corner............................. G5 96 Alexandra Hospital ......................E3 Green Street Green (Dartford) . C2 Pratts Bottom..............................
    [Show full text]
  • T&MBC Projects. Medway Valley Countryside Partnership April 2014
    ANNEX1 T&MBC Projects. Medway Valley Countryside Partnership April 2014 - January 2015 The Partnership’s Objectives: 1. Creating, sustaining and enhancing our landscape and biodiversity 2. Developing, managing and supporting community-based environmental initiatives 3. Developing, and promoting life-long outdoor learning 4. Encouraging and enhancing greater access in the outdoors and the corresponding health benefits 5. Ensuring the Partnership has the resources for effective development and operation Project work is delivered by the Partnership team; Mark Pritchard (MP), Mary Tate (MT), Derek Whitehead (DW), Simon Ginnaw (SG), Louise Smith (LS) and Andrea Griffiths (AG) supported by the Manager Kim Richards (CD) Seasonal staff are recruited as stewards for Oare Gunpowder works managed by MVCP as part of the Kent Countryside Management Partnership’s contract with Swale Borough Council. A separate “Orchards for All Project” run by Pippa Palmar (PP) also operates across all boroughs. The majority of projects are funded through a number of partners thereby leveraging the value for each partner. A Steering Group of representatives from Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council (Mike Harris), Maidstone Borough Council and Kent County Council steer the Partnership through quarterly meetings and following a MoA. Creating, sustaining and enhancing our landscape & biodiversity Giant Hogweed Control Programme (AG) In 2014 the project has again covered 200+km of riparian habitat through liaising with landowners and organisations to deliver a coordinated control of Giant Hogweed. More than 9000 individual plants were spayed across the whole catchment. The Scheme covers the Medway catchment and the River Cray in the London Borough of Bexley. In specific areas Himalayan Balsam (for flood defence purposes) and Japanese Knotweed are also controlled.
    [Show full text]
  • Medway Local Development Framework
    Attachment 1 MEDWAY LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PUBLICATION DRAFT CORE STRATEGY [CABINET VERSION] AUGUST 2011 Publication Draft Core Strategy August 2011 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 2. Context and Issues ....................................................................................... 9 3. Vision and Strategic Objectives................................................................. 23 4. Cross Cutting Themes ................................................................................ 33 5. Housing........................................................................................................ 70 6. Economic Development.............................................................................. 81 7. Energy, Waste and Minerals....................................................................... 95 8. Transport and Movement ......................................................................... 109 9. The River Medway..................................................................................... 116 10. Area Policies.............................................................................................. 121 11. Implementation, Monitoring and Review ................................................ 164 Appendix A: Schedule of Superseded (Replaced) Policies .............................. 193 Appendix B: Schedule of Current Supplementary Planning Documents........ 195 Appendix C: Housing Trajectory and Sources
    [Show full text]