Appropriate Assessment of the Chilterns Area of Outstanding

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appropriate Assessment of the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Chilterns AONB Management Plan 2008-2013 Screening for Appropriate Assessment - Baseline Report Screening of the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Management Plan 2008-2013 for Appropriate Assessment – Baseline Report 1. Executive Summary 1.1 The purpose of this report is to determine whether there is a need to carry out a full Appropriate Assessment of the Chilterns AONB Management Plan 2008-13. 1.2 This report considers potential impacts arising from the AONB Management Plan alone and in combination with other plans, and with respect to the European sites’ conservation objectives. The sites in question are all, in this case, Special Areas of Conservation (SACs). 1.3 Production of the AONB Management Plan is a statutory duty of the Conservation Board under the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000. The plan outlines the Board’s policies for the management of the AONB and fulfilment of its statutory purposes which are: a. To conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the AONB; and b. to increase the understanding and enjoyment of the special qualities of the AONB. 1.4 The SACs potentially affected by the AONB Management Plan are as follows: • Aston Rowant • Chilterns Beechwoods (a composite of 9 sites) • Hartslock Wood • Burnham Beeches (outside the AONB) • Little Wittenham (outside the AONB) 1.5 All policies and proposals in the AONB Management Plan have been screened and it is considered that there are no significant environmental effects on the SACs within or in close proximity to the AONB. Consequently, a full appropriate assessment of the plan is not required. 1 Chilterns AONB Management Plan 2008-2013 Screening for Appropriate Assessment - Baseline Report 2. Introduction 2.1 The Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) Regulations 1994 (as amended by The Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) (Amendment) Regulations 2007) require (Regulation 48) that a competent authority shall make an appropriate assessment of the implications for European sites in view of the sites’ conservation objectives. The purpose of this Baseline Report is to ensure that the Management Plan 2008-13 and its policies have no significant environmental impact on sites of European Interest. 2.2 The Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 places a duty on Conservation Boards to produce a plan which outlines their policies for the management of the AONB and how they will carry out their functions in relation to it. Management plans must be reviewed at least every five years. 2.3 The previous management plan for the Chilterns AONB, The Framework for Action 2002 – 2007 has now been reviewed, forming the basis for the draft Management Plan 2008 – 2013. 2.4 The Plan sets out broad aims for the management of the AONB. Policies and actions within the Plan outline how these aims will be achieved by the Board and other parties with an interest in the AONB. In formulating the policies and actions within the Plan the Board seeks to fulfil its two statutory purposes which are: a. to conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the AONB; and b. to increase the understanding and enjoyment of the special qualities of the AONB. 2.5 This screening report is intended to determine whether there is a need to carry out a full appropriate assessment of the Chilterns AONB Management Plan (2008 -2013) and its polices in relation to sites of European Interest. 2.6 The Conservation Board, as the ‘competent authority' has to satisfy itself that, in adopting the plan, there will be no significant effect on European sites. 2.7 The Board has liaised with Natural England at an early stage regarding which sites to consider, conservation objectives and key environmental conditions for the sites concerned. 2.8 The Board recognises that the AONB management plan will be implemented in the context of changing spatial patterns and housing growth, as directed by the Regional Spatial Strategies and Local Development Frameworks. These are themselves subject to Appropriate Assessment. The AONB Management Plan does not propose any growth or development, and its policies promote conservation of the natural environment and sustainable use of it. 2 Chilterns AONB Management Plan 2008-2013 Screening for Appropriate Assessment - Baseline Report 3. Sites under consideration 3.1 Summary 3.1.1 There are 3 SACs within the AONB – Aston Rowant, Hartslock Wood and Chilterns Beechwoods. Chilterns Beechwoods comprises of 9 separate sites, of which 8 are within the AONB. 3.1.3 In addition, Burnham Beeches SAC and Little Wittenham SAC have been considered as they are within 10 - 12 km of the AONB boundary and could theoretically be affected indirectly by the Management Plan. Figure 1: Sites considered as part of the screening 3 Chilterns AONB Management Plan 2008-2013 Screening for Appropriate Assessment - Baseline Report Table 1: Special Areas of Conservation that were assessed for significant adverse effects of the Chilterns AONB Management Plan Name Location Area (ha) Qualifying Comments on Nature Key Environmental Possible Impacts Arising From Plan Risk of Other Plans To Be Risk of Significant Features1 Conservation Conditions to Support Significant Considered in Effect In Importance Site Integrity Effect? Combination Combination? Aston Rowant Buckinghamshire; 127.75 • Juniper on • One of the best • Regular management • No negative impacts. The plan actively • No Regional Spatial • No Oxfordshire heaths or remaining examples to keep vegetation promotes management of sites to meet Strategies and Local calcareous in UK of lowland open and allow conservation objectives. Development grasslands juniper scrub seedlings to establish. Frameworks. • Beech forests on (between 1,000 and neutral to rich 2,000 individuals of • Prevention of rabbit • No negative impacts. The plan actively • No Regional Spatial • No soils varying age classes). grazing of seedlings. promotes management of sites to meet Strategies and Local conservation objectives Development Frameworks. • Minimal air pollution. • Although the plan encourages • No Regional Spatial • No. Although RSS countryside recreation, the policies Strategies and Local and LDFs propose specifically encourage environmentally Development housing growth, they sustainable access including minimising Frameworks. will be subject to car use and visiting countryside close to Appropriate home. Assessment themselves, and the Management Plan policies specifically encourage environmentally sustainable access. 1 Terminology is the lay or English name as used by JNCC 4 Chilterns AONB Management Plan 2008-2013 Screening for Appropriate Assessment - Baseline Report Burnham Beeches Buckinghamshire 382.76 • Beech forests on • Wood-pasture, with • Minimal atmospheric • No negative impacts. There are no • No Regional Spatial • No acid soils veteran trees. pollution - may policies within the AONB Management Strategies and Local • One of the richest increase the Plan to increase visits to Burnham Development sites for saproxylic susceptibility of beech Beeches. Frameworks. invertebrates in the trees to disease and UK, including 14 Red alter epiphytic Data Book species. communities. • Nationally important epiphytic • Restricted public • No negative impacts. There are no • No Regional Spatial • No communities. access (extensive policies within the AONB Management Strategies and Local public access may Plan that would impact on Burnham Development compromise ability to Beeches Frameworks. retain falling timber associated with old trees). • No negative impacts. There are no policies within the AONB Management • Maintenance of an Plan that would impact on Burnham • No Regional Spatial • No adequate and stable Beeches Strategies and Local hydrological system Development Frameworks 5 Chilterns AONB Management Plan 2008-2013 Screening for Appropriate Assessment - Baseline Report Chilterns Buckinghamshire; 1276.48 • Beech forests on • A distinctive feature in • Minimal atmospheric • No negative impacts - policies • No Regional Spatial • No. Although RSS Beechwoods Hertfordshire; neutral to rich the woodland flora is pollution - may specifically encourage environmentally Strategies and Local and LDFs propose Oxfordshire; Windsor soils the occurrence of increase the sustainable access including minimising Development housing growth, they and Maidenhead • Dry grasslands populations of the rare susceptibility of beech car use and visiting countryside close to Frameworks will be subject to (Nine sites) and scrublands coralroot. trees to disease home. Appropriate on chalk or • Recent dry years are Assessment limestone believed to be putting themselves, and the • Stag Beetle trees under stress. Management plan policies specifically encourage environmentally sustainable access. • Managed public • No negative impacts - policies • No Regional Spatial access to forest and encourage increased public awareness Strategies and Local • No nearby dry calcareous and responsible attitudes to visiting the Development grasslands countryside. Frameworks • Appropriate • No negative impacts. The plan actively • No Regional Spatial • No management of promotes management of sites to meet Strategies and Local grasslands conservation objectives Development Frameworks . • Absence of direct • No negative impacts. The plan actively • No Regional Spatial • No fertilization. promotes management of sites to meet Strategies and Local conservation objectives Development Frameworks 6 Chilterns AONB Management Plan 2008-2013 Screening for Appropriate Assessment - Baseline Report Hartslock Wood Oxfordshire 34.24 • Dry grasslands
Recommended publications
  • Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods
    . O O o . 0 O . 0 . O Shoping growth in Docorum Appendices for Topic Paper for the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC A summary/overview of available evidence BOROUGH Dacorum Local Plan (2020-2038) Emerging Strategy for Growth COUNCIL November 2020 Appendices Natural England reports 5 Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation 6 Appendix 1: Citation for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) 7 Appendix 2: Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Features Matrix 9 Appendix 3: European Site Conservation Objectives for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation Site Code: UK0012724 11 Appendix 4: Site Improvement Plan for Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, 2015 13 Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 27 Appendix 5: Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI citation 28 Appendix 6: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 31 Appendix 7: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 33 Appendix 8: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Ashridge Commons and Woods, SSSI, Hertfordshire/Buckinghamshire 38 Appendix 9: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Ashridge Commons and Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003 40 Tring Woodlands SSSI 44 Appendix 10: Tring Woodlands SSSI citation 45 Appendix 11: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 48 Appendix 12: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 51 Appendix 13: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Tring Woodlands SSSI 53 Appendix 14: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Tring Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Wycombe District Local Plan Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment
    Wycombe District Local Plan Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment Report – including Appropriate Assessment January 2019 Wycombe District Local Plan– Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (January 2019) This page is left intentionally blank. 2 Wycombe District Local Plan– Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (January 2019) Contents Chapter 1 – Introduction .................................................................................. 7 HRA and other assessments .......................................................................... 7 Legislative context .......................................................................................... 7 Sites integrity .................................................................................................. 9 Chapter 2 – Methodology ............................................................................... 12 Stages of HRA .............................................................................................. 12 Scope of the Report ..................................................................................... 13 Assessment Steps ........................................................................................ 15 Chapter 3 – Special Areas of Conservation ................................................... 17 SACs assessed in this Report - Overview .................................................... 17 Site Improvement Plans ............................................................................... 19 Aston Rowant SAC ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 92
    WYCOMBE and SOUTH BUCKS WILDLIFE NEWS Registered Charity MAY 2020 No: 1075175 Booker Common Woods contain a network of well managed footpaths which are wide enough to prevent social distancing problems during the coronavirus restrictions. Issue 92 Contents include: Wycombe Wildlife News is published 3 times a year to promote the Group and wildlife issues, and inform members and the public Why I love The Chilterns 15 of its activities. Down Memory Lane 16 Edited and produced by Roger Wilding. Proof reading by Frances Wilding. Recording for the BSBI in South Buckinghamshire 17 Content written by Roger Wilding except where shown otherwise. Bird watching at Spade Oak Lake 18 Drawings by Frances Wilding Moth trapping with a difference 18 Photographs by Karen Roberts (moths), the late Maurice Young (Down Memory Lane) and Roger Coronavirus walks 19 Wilding (others). Printed by Greens, Lincoln Rd, High Wycombe. The flight of the Fulmar 22 Views expressed in this newsletter are those of the Sightings submitted by members 23 authors and not necessarily those of the Group. What was this? 24 For the purposes of management of the Group, membership information is held on computer. Editorial s well as reporting the talks and walks in January to April, the May issue of our Anewsletter is normally circulated after our AGM in order to avoid any delay in Wycombe Wildlife informing members of any important issues arising from that meeting. 2020 has of Group is a registered course not been a normal year for anyone, and all our activities following the March charity with the members’ meeting had to be either cancelled or postponed until further notice.
    [Show full text]
  • RBWM Borough Local Plan
    RBWM Borough Local Plan: Air Quality Assessment of Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Information to Inform an Appropriate Assessment (Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) Stage 2) ___________________________________________________ Report for: Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead ED11104103 ED 11104103 | Issue Number 4 | Date 25/02/2019 Ricardo Energy & Environment RBWM Borough Local Plan: Air Quality Assessment of Chilterns Beechwoods SAC | i Customer: Contact: Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Mark Broomfield, Gemini Building, Fermi Avenue, Harwell, Didcot, OX11 0QR, UK. t: +44 (0)1235 75 3493 e: [email protected] Confidentiality, copyright & reproduction: This report is submitted by Ricardo Energy & Ricardo-AEA Ltd is certificated to ISO9001 and Environment under contract to the Royal Borough ISO14001 of Windsor and Maidenhead. It may not be used for any other purposes without the specific Author: permission in writing of the Commercial Manager, Ben Jones and Ken Lipscomb Ricardo Energy & Environment. Approved By: Mark Broomfield and Richard Andrews Date: 25 February 2019 Ricardo Energy & Environment reference: Ref: ED11104103- Issue Number 4 Ref: Ricardo/ED11104103/Issue Number 4 Ricardo Energy & Environment RBWM Borough Local Plan: Air Quality Assessment of Chilterns Beechwoods SAC | ii Table of contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The overall Plan................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Criteria for the Selection of Local Wildlife Sites in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire
    Criteria for the Selection of Local Wildlife Sites in Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Version Date Authors Notes 4.0 January 2009 MHa, MCH, PB, MD, AMcV Edits and updates from wider consultation group 5.0 May 2009 MHa, MCH, PB, MD, AMcV, GDB, RM Additional edits and corrections 6.0 November 2009 Mha, GH, AF, GDB, RM Additional edits and corrections This document was prepared by Buckinghamshire and Milton Keynes Environmental Records Centre (BMERC) and Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC) and commissioned by the Oxfordshire and Berkshire Local Authorities and by Buckinghamshire County Council Contents 1.0 Introduction..............................................................................................4 2.0 Selection Criteria for Local Wildlife Sites .....................................................6 3.0 Where does a Local Wildlife Site start and finish? Drawing the line............. 17 4.0 UKBAP Habitat descriptions ………………………………………………………………….19 4.1 Lowland Calcareous Grassland………………………………………………………… 20 4.2 Lowland Dry Acid Grassland................................................................ 23 4.3 Lowland Meadows.............................................................................. 26 4.4 Lowland heathland............................................................................. 29 4.5 Eutrophic Standing Water ................................................................... 32 4.6. Mesotrophic Lakes ............................................................................ 35 4.7
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Conservation Upper Thames Branch Moth Sightings Archive - July to December 2012
    Butterfly Conservation Upper Thames Branch Moth Sightings Archive - July to December 2012 MOTH SPECIES COUNT FOR 2012 = 946 ~ Friday 25th January 2013 ~ Andy King sent the following: "Peter Hall has identified a number of moths for me and just one of them is of particular note for your site: A Coleophora currucipennella flew into my trap on 23 July 2012 at Philipshill Wood, Bucks. This was a small, brownish unprepossessing thing. Its significance is that it was only the second Bucks record for this proposed Red Data Book 3 species. " ~ Tuesday 8th January 2013 ~ 05/01/13 - Dave Wilton sent the following report: "On 5th January Peter Hall completed the final dissections of difficult moths from me for 2012 and the following can now be added to the year list: Maple Pug (Westcott 8th August), Acompsia cinerella (Steps Hill 14th August), Agonopterix nervosa (Calvert 9th September), Anacampsis blattariella (Finemere Wood 19th August), Caryocolum fraternella (Calvert 12th August), Coleophora albitarsella (Westcott 10th August), Coleophora versurella (Ivinghoe Beacon 9th August), Cosmiotes stabilella (Calvert 17th August), Depressaria badiella (Calvert 12th August), Depressaria chaerophylli (Ivinghoe Beacon 3rd September), Depressaria douglasella (Ivinghoe Beacon 3rd August), Monochroa lutulentella (Finemere Wood 1st September), Oegoconia quadripuncta (Ivinghoe Beacon 9th August), Phyllonorycter oxyacanthae (Westcott 18th August), Scoparia basistrigalis (Calvert 12th August), Stigmella obliquella (Finemere Wood 19th August), Stigmella salicis (private wood near Buckingham 20th August) & Stigmella samiatella (Finemere Wood 17th July). Thankyou Peter!" ~ Friday 7th December 2012 ~ Dave Wilton sent this update: "On 20th November here at Westcott, Bucks my garden actinic trap managed Caloptilia rufipennella (1), Acleris schalleriana (1), an as yet unconfirmed Depressaria sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3 the Stakeholder Workshop
    Appendix 3 The Stakeholder Workshop Land Use Consultants Wycombe, South Bucks and Chiltern District Landscape Character Assessment Stakeholder Workshop Report Prepared for Buckinghamshire County Council by Land Use Consultants February 2011 www.landuse.co.uk LUC SERVICES Environmental Planning Landscape Design Landscape Management Masterplanning Landscape Planning Ecology Environmental Assessment Rural Futures Digital Design Urban Regeneration Urban Design 43 Chalton Street 37 Otago Street London NW1 1JD Glasgow G1 (15.1)2 8JJ Tel: 020 7383 5784 Tel: 0141 334 9595 Fax: 020 7383 4798 Fax: 0141 334 7789 [email protected] [email protected] 14 Great George Street 28 Stafford Street Bristol BS1 5RH Edinburgh EH3 (16.1) 7BD Tel: 0117 929 1997 Tel: 0131 202 1616 Fax: 0117 929 1998 [email protected] [email protected] DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Version Issued by: Approved by: Final Kate Milner Kate Ahern Landscape Architect Principal-in-Charge 16/14/11 16/14/11 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 EXERCISE 1: WHAT IS SPECIAL ABOUT THE WYCOMBE, SOUTH BUCKS AND CHILTERN LANDSCAPE AND WHY? 3 3 EXERCISE 2: TESTING THE CHARACTER MAPS AND DESCRIPTIONS 21 4 EVALUATION AND NEXT STEPS 43 i i 1 Introduction 1.1 Buckinghamshire County Council and Wycombe, South Bucks and Chiltern District Councils are currently working with Land Use Consultants to complete a Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) for Buckinghamshire. This study will tie in with existing Aylesbury Vale Landscape Character Assessment to provide a complete assessment for the County. The results of the study will help to guide future landscape management and planning decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • BUCKS INVERTEBRATE GROUP BULLETIN Number 24
    BIG News Number 24 Editor: Peter Hall, Rams Corner, Little Cowarne, BROMYARD, Hereford HR7 4RG e-mail [email protected] BUCKS INVERTEBRATE GROUP BULLETIN Number 24 Contents Editorial Peter Hall Page 1 - 2 Ballinger Common 20 years of Moth Trapping Peter Hall Pages 2 - 3 News from Prestwood Nature 2013 Tony and Val Marshall Pages 3 - 5 Leaf-mines and Galls on Bracken Neil Fletcher Pages 5 - 6 2013 Moth Review Martin Albertini Pages 6 -10 Highlights of the 2013 Season: Westcott David Wilton Pages 10-17 The New Lepidoptera Checklist Martin Albertini Pages 17 Burnished Brass moth: One species or two? Martin Albertini Page 17-18 Field Meeting Reports for 2013 Pages 18-37 Bucks Invertebrate Recording Group Newsletter Number 1 (1989) Pages 37-40 some originals amongst us. Here’s to the next Editorial 25 years. To begin the celebrations, at the back of this edition are extracts from the very Peter Hall first “bulletin” and I plan to put in more in the following edition next year. My thanks go to You may well notice that this is number 24. my wife Claire, for re-typing the faded scanned This actually means that this coming Summer pages of the original and it means Nigel th marks our 25 year of existence - as the Partridge can now have a complete set of bulletins appear after the season. I plan to searchable editions for the website. insert an original picture of the group taken at the first ever meeting in the next issue. So As many of you know, I have moved home many faces have changed, but there are still over the Winter and emigrated westwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Landscape Characterisation
    Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes Historic Landscape Characterisation County Archaeological Service 2006 © 12XX design by Communications Design Team, a not for profit service, Buckinghamshire County Council 01296 382717 [email protected] a not for profit service, Buckinghamshire County Council 01296 382717 [email protected] Team, © 12XX design by Communications Design 37HH artwork version2.indd 2 25/9/06 11:16:05 Foreword Contents Buckinghamshire enjoys a rich and diverse Executive Summary Part 3: Using Historic landscape which has been shaped by Landscape Characterisation mankind over hundreds of years giving every Part 1: Overview of the Study Overview place its own distinctive character. Background Strategic Planning Today’s landscape reflects the endeavours Methodology Landscape Character Assessment of prehistoric farmers, medieval lords and Historic Landscape Types Green Infrastructure Planning peasants, the gentry’s garden designers and Development Control Victorian surveyors. This historic landscape Part 2: Historic Landscape Profiles Conservation Area Appraisal project has for the first time mapped Historic Buckinghamshire Landscape Management these changes across the whole historic Aylesbury Vale District Community and Education county providing information to enrich our Chiltern District Research appreciation of Buckinghamshire’s special Milton Keynes rural character. The report summarises South Bucks District Part 4: Accessing Historic Landscape the study’s conclusions and shows how Wycombe District Characterisation Data and its information can be used to care for this Landscape History Technical Appendices wonderful asset for the benefit of current and Change and Sensitivity future generations. We urge all organisations and individuals with a responsibility for Buckinghamshire’s landscape to take heed of this study when planning for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Bucks-List-All-Species.Pdf
    Buckinghamshire Bird List Updated in Jul 2020 with 2017 records. 2018 records are available in the Buckinghamshire Bird Club Annual Report. Updated Chart data Feb 2019 Red : Sightings Records Pink : Rare Breeding Records Purple : “Probables” Green : Probable Escapees Navy Blue : Records yet to be Considered by the Bucks Records Committee 1. Red-throated Diver Gavia stellata Rare vagrant. 19 records. View historical photos (for more recent photos see Gallery of members photos) Prior 1910 near Aylesbury Station – shot and presented to County Museum. 1952 Little Marlow GPs – Adult from 27th Oct to 7th Nov. 1970 Hurley – 1 on the River Thames from 11th-31st Mar. 1971 Stanton Low GP – A diver Sp from 25th Feb to 8th Mar was considered to be of this species. 1976 Calvert – 1 from 13th-16th Feb and 22nd Feb. 1978 Hurley – A diver Sp on the River Thames on 19th Feb was considered to be of this species. 1978 Wotton Lakes – 1 from 5th-12th Mar. 1979 Willen – 1 on 14th Mar. 1980 Willen – 1 from 7th-10th Oct 1986 Willen – 1 on 7th Feb. 1987 Weston Turville Res. – A slightly oiled adult from 8th-10th Dec was taken into care but later died. 1988 Calvert – A diver Sp on 17th Nov was considered to be of this species. 1989 Willen – 14 on 2nd Apr, with 6 present just after dawn on on 3rd and 2 remaining until 09:00. This influx may have been caused by snow on the E coast. 1990 Little Marlow GP – Juvenile 16th Dec until 12th Jan 1991. 1994 Stowe School – 1 on 20th Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • River Thame Wq Catchment Review March 1996
    ZGI National Rivers Authority Thames Region Catchment Planning - West River Thame wQ Catchment Review March 1996 Document for internal circulation only CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE WATER ENVIRONMENT 2.1 Overview 3 2.2 Geology 3 2.3 Hydrogeology 5 2.4 Water Resources 5 2.5 Water Quality 11 2.6 Effluent Disposal 15 2.7 Pollution Control 16 2.8 Groundwater Quality 17 2.9 Biological Water Quality 18 2.10 Flood Defence 20 2.11 Fisheries 24 2.12 Conservation 25 2.13 Landscape 29 2.14 Recreation 31 2! 15 Navigation -- 32 2.16 Land Use Planning 32 3. CATCHMENT ISSUES 39 4. CATCHMENT ACTIONS 42 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 45 APPENDICES 1. Table of River Quality GQA and RE 46 2. Consented discharges with sample points 47 3. Summary of macro-invertebrate monitoring results 49 4. Flood Defence - Land Use Bands and SOS reaches 53 5. Flood Defence - Standard of Service Reaches 54 Glossary 56 LIST OF FIGURES Page 1. Rainfall for Thame catchment 7 2. Percolation for Thame catchment 8 3. Hydrograph of River Thame at Wheatley 9 4. Licensed and Actual Abstraction for 1993 11 5. GQA Classification 12 6. River Ecosystem Classification 14 7. Pollution Incident Data 1995 16 8. Prosecutions for Pollution Offences 17 9. EC Fish Directives 24 10. SSSIs within the Thame catchment 27 LIST OF MAPS 1. Overview 2 2. Geology 4 3. Water Resources 10 4. Water Quality 13 5. Biological Water Quality and Bacteriology 19 6. Flood Plain 22 7. Fisheries and Conservation 26 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Improvement Plan Chilterns Beechwoods
    Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 Sites (IPENS) Planning for the Future Site Improvement Plan Chilterns Beechwoods Site Improvement Plans (SIPs) have been developed for each Natura 2000 site in England as part of the Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 sites (IPENS). Natura 2000 sites is the combined term for sites designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protected Areas (SPA). This work has been financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community. The plan provides a high level overview of the issues (both current and predicted) affecting the condition of the Natura 2000 features on the site(s) and outlines the priority measures required to improve the condition of the features. It does not cover issues where remedial actions are already in place or ongoing management activities which are required for maintenance. The SIP consists of three parts: a Summary table, which sets out the priority Issues and Measures; a detailed Actions table, which sets out who needs to do what, when and how much it is estimated to cost; and a set of tables containing contextual information and links. Once this current programme ends, it is anticipated that Natural England and others, working with landowners and managers, will all play a role in delivering the priority measures to improve the condition of the features on these sites. The SIPs are based on Natural England's current evidence and knowledge. The SIPs are not legal documents, they are live documents that will be updated to reflect changes in our evidence/knowledge and as actions get underway.
    [Show full text]