DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Legal Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Legal Document Case 17-157, Document 31, 04/21/2017, 2017127, Page1 of 239 17-157 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Docket No. 17-157 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs-Appellees, —v.— DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, including its components THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL AND OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Defendants-Appellants. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOINT APPENDIX VOLUME IV OF IV (Pages A-722 to A-954) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES JOON H. KIM UNION FOUNDATION Acting United States Attorney for Attorneys for the Southern District of New York Plaintiffs-Appellees Attorney for Defendants-Appellants 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor 86 Chambers Street, 3rd Floor New York, New York 10004 New York, New York 10007 (212) 549-2603 (212) 637-2709 Case 17-157, Document 31, 04/21/2017, 2017127, Page2 of 239 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Civil Docket Sheet for Case No. 15 Civ. 1954 (CM) (S.D.N.Y.) ........................ A-1 Complaint for Injunctive Relief dated March 16, 2015. .............................................................................. A-12 Notice of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment dated August 28, 2015 .............................................................................. A-21 “Waiver Table” Attached as Appendix to Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law ..... A-23 Declaration of Matthew Spurlock dated August 28, 2015 .............................................................................. A-64 Exhibit 1 ................................................................................................... A-70 Exhibit 2 ................................................................................................... A-85 Exhibit 3 ................................................................................................... A-92 Exhibit 4 ................................................................................................. A-136 Exhibit 5 ................................................................................................. A-152 Exhibit 6 ................................................................................................. A-161 Exhibit 7 ................................................................................................. A-171 Exhibit 8 ................................................................................................. A-188 Exhibit 9 ................................................................................................. A-221 Exhibit 10 ............................................................................................... A-287 Exhibit 11 ............................................................................................... A-292 Exhibit 12 ............................................................................................... A-298 Exhibit 13 ............................................................................................... A-322 Exhibit 14 ............................................................................................... A-326 Exhibit 15 ............................................................................................... A-336 Exhibit 16 ............................................................................................... A-354 Exhibit 17 ............................................................................................... A-367 Exhibit 18 ............................................................................................... A-377 Exhibit 19 ............................................................................................... A-395 i Case 17-157, Document 31, 04/21/2017, 2017127, Page3 of 239 Exhibit 20 ............................................................................................... A-398 Exhibit 21 ............................................................................................... A-429 Exhibit 22 ............................................................................................... A-437 Exhibit 23 ............................................................................................... A-497 Exhibit 24 ............................................................................................... A-590 Exhibit 25 ............................................................................................... A-597 Exhibit 26 ............................................................................................... A-619 Exhibit 27 ............................................................................................... A-623 Exhibit 28 ............................................................................................... A-655 Exhibit 29 ............................................................................................... A-690 Exhibit 30 ............................................................................................... A-694 Exhibit 31 ............................................................................................... A-703 Exhibit 32 ............................................................................................... A-710 Exhibit 33 ............................................................................................... A-722 Exhibit 34 ............................................................................................... A-727 Exhibit 35 ............................................................................................... A-733 Exhibit 36 ............................................................................................... A-742 Exhibit 37 ............................................................................................... A-746 Exhibit 38 ............................................................................................... A-749 Exhibit 39 ............................................................................................... A-754 Exhibit 40 ............................................................................................... A-757 Exhibit 41 ............................................................................................... A-767 Exhibit 42 ............................................................................................... A-771 Exhibit 43 ............................................................................................... A-780 Exhibit 44 ............................................................................................... A-783 Exhibit 45 ............................................................................................... A-786 Exhibit 46 ............................................................................................... A-826 Exhibit 47 ............................................................................................... A-830 Exhibit 48 ............................................................................................... A-852 Exhibit 49 ............................................................................................... A-857 Exhibit 50 ............................................................................................... A-862 Defendants’ Notice of Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment dated October 2, 2015 ............................................................................. A-865 ii Case 17-157, Document 31, 04/21/2017, 2017127, Page4 of 239 Second Declaration of Matthew Spurlock dated December 1, 2015 ......................................................................... A-867 Exhibit 51 ............................................................................................... A-869 Exhibit 52 ............................................................................................... A-877 Exhibit 53 ............................................................................................... A-885 Exhibit 54 ............................................................................................... A-888 Declaration of Sarah S. Normand dated December 22, 2015 ....................................................................... A-895 Exhibit A ................................................................................................ A-897 Exhibit B ................................................................................................ A-902 Exhibit C ................................................................................................ A-906 Letter to Court from Jameel Jaffer dated April 13, 2016 .............................................................................. A-908 Letter to Court from Sarah S. Normand dated April 18, 2016 ........................................................................... A-938.1 Summary of Sealed Activity for Public Record dated July 25, 2016 ................................................................................. A-939 Plaintiffs’ Notice of Errata and Corrected Exhibit 54 dated August 17, 2016 ............................................................................ A-941 Notice of Appeal dated January 17, 2017 ........................................................................... A-954 iii Case 17-157, Document 31, 04/21/2017, 2017127, Page5 of 239 A-722 Case 1:15-cv-01954-CM Document 34-33 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 5 Exhibit 33 May 2013 Fact Sheet Case 17-157, Document 31, 04/21/2017, 2017127, Page6 of 239 A-723 Case 1:15-cv-01954-CM
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supply Chain Management of Rations in Indian Army
    47 SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT OF RATIONS IN INDIAN ARMY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE 2011-2012 FORTY-SEVENTH REPORT FIFTEENTH LOK SABHA LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI FORTY-SEVENTH REPORT PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE (2011-2012) (FIFTEENTH LOK SABHA) SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT OF RATIONS IN INDIAN ARMY MINISTRY OF DEFENCE Presented to Lok Sabha on 28 December, 2011 Laid in Rajya Sabha on 28 December, 2011 LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI December, 2011/Pausa, 1933 (Saka) PAC NO. 1956 Price: ` 70.00 ©2011 BY LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT Published under Rule 382 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha (Fourteenth Edition) and Printed by the General Manager, Government of India Press, Minto Road, New Delhi-110 002. CONTENTS PAGE COMPOSITION OF THE PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE (2011-12) ...................... (iii) COMPOSITION OF THE PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE (2010-11) ...................... (V) INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ (vii) REPORT PART I I. Introductory .......................................................................................... 1 II. Audit Review ....................................................................................... 2 III. Dry Rations (a) Provisioning of Dry Rations ...................................................... 3 (b) Opening Stock Balances Adopted at different levels for Demand Projections Differed Substantially ................................ 9 (c) Procurement of Dry Rations ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    Case 1:13-cv-00825-ABJ Document 73 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) GILBERTE JILL KELLEY, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-cv-825 (ABJ) ) THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF ) INVESTIGATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) DEFENDANT FBI’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI” or “the Bureau”), by and through undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 30(d)(3) and 26(c), respectfully moves the Court for a protective order: (a) Limiting the September 2, 2015, deposition of FBI Supervisory Special Agent Adam Malone (to the extent the deposition remains open and continued) on the Rule 30(d)(3) ground that certain portions of the deposition were “conducted in bad faith or in a manner that unreasonably annoys, embarrasses, or oppresses” the witness or the FBI pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(3); and (b) Restricting, pursuant to Rule 26(c), any further FBI-related discovery to the discovery of (1) facts sufficient to show disclosure(s) to the media by one or more FBI employees in a manner violating the Privacy Act, and (2) facts relating to the governments’ defenses to the plaintiffs’ remaining claims. Co-defendant the Department of Defense (“DoD”) concurs with the motion. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(m), counsel for defendants have met and conferred with counsel for plaintiffs. Plaintiffs oppose this motion. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Statement of Points and Authorities and the FBI’s proposed Under Seal Supplement, the Court should grant the instant motion.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIA ADVISORY: Thursday, August 11, 2011**
    **MEDIA ADVISORY: Thursday, August 11, 2011** WWE SummerSlam Cranks Up the Heat at Participating Cineplex Entertainment Theatres Live, in High-Definition on Sunday, August 14, 2011 WHAT: Three championship titles are up for grabs, one will unify the prestigious WWE Championship this Sunday. Cineplex Entertainment, via our Front Row Centre Events, is pleased to announce WWE SummerSlam will be broadcast live at participating Cineplex theatres across Canada on Sunday, August 14, 2011 at 8:00 p.m. EDT, 7:00 p.m. CDT, 6:00 p.m. MDT and 5:00 p.m. PDT live from the Staples Center in Los Angeles, CA. Matches WWE Champion John Cena vs. WWE Champion CM Punk in an Undisputed WWE Championship Match World Heavyweight Champion Christian vs. Randy Orton in a No Holds Barred Match WWE Divas Champion Kelly Kelly vs. Beth Phoenix WHEN: Sunday, August 14, 2011 at 8:00 p.m. EDT, 7:00 p.m. CDT, 6:00 p.m. MDT and 5:00 p.m. PDT WHERE: Advance tickets are now available at participating theatre box offices, through the Cineplex Mobile Apps and online at www.cineplex.com/events or our mobile site m.cineplex.com. A special rate is available for larger groups of 20 or more. Please contact Cineplex corporate sales at 1-800-313-4461 or via email at [email protected]. The following 2011 WWE events will be shown live at select Cineplex Entertainment theatres: WWE Night of Champions September 18, 2011 WWE Hell in the Cell October 2, 2011 WWE Vengeance (formerly Bragging Rights) October 23, 2011 WWE Survivor Series November 20, 2011 WWE TLC: Tables, Ladders & Chairs December 18, 2011 -30- For more information, photos or interviews, please contact: Pat Marshall, Vice President, Communications and Investor Relations, Cineplex Entertainment, 416-323- 6648, [email protected] Kyle Moffatt, Director, Communications, Cineplex Entertainment, 416-323-6728, [email protected] .
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Chapter 4 Building International Will and Capacity to Counter Terrorism The Department of State engages diplomatically with for- eign governments and in international and regional fora to accomplish the US Government’s first priority — protect- ing Americans at home and abroad. The Department of State’s diplomatic efforts help build the political will and operational skills of foreign governments to combat terror. Many countries are committed allies in the global war on terrorism. Some, however, need train- ing and resources to develop stronger institutions and capabilities. The Department of State’s counterterrorism efforts are an essential component in the success of US military, law enforcement, intelligence, and financial ac- tivities in the global fight against terrorism. Multilateral and regional organizations are also a key plat- form for developing broad international support for the adoption and implementation of policies, strategies, and “best practices” in combating terrorism and financing of terrorist activities. The Department of State works actively with foreign governments to urge adoption of all 12 inter- national counterterrorism conventions, as well as adherence to and implementation of UNSCR 1373, which imposes binding obligations on all states to suppress and prevent terrorist financing, improve their border controls, enhance information sharing and law enforcement coop- eration, suppress terrorist recruitment, and deny terrorists safe haven. Antiterrorism Assistance Program Ambassador J. Cofer Black, former US State Department Coordinator Congress authorized the Antiterrorism Assistance (ATA) Pro- for Counterterrorism, during a news conference at the IV Regular gram in 1983 as part of a major initiative against international Session of the Organization of American States Inter-American terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • News Magazine Coverage of the Petraeus/Broadwell Affair: The
    Research In Depth News Magazine Coverage of the Petraeus/Broadwell Affair: The Disjunction between Power and Agency By Tetyana Lokot, Antonio Prado, become more likely to think that off-hours morality Boya Xu, and Linda Steiner and marital infidelity are relevant to the career as- sessment of those political figures, potentially forc- All four authors are in the Philip Merrill College of Jour- ing the resignation or firing of a scandalous figure. nalism at the University of Maryland. No wonder, then, that the extramarital affair be- tween General David Petraeus (Ret), then Director Tetyana Lokot is a doctoral candidate whose research inter- of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and his ests include augmented dissent and the use of digital me- biographer Paula Broadwell aracted significant dia and social networks in protests in post-Soviet coun- media aention in November and December 2012, tries. dominating front pages and leading broadcast news shows. Admiing his sexual relationship with Antonio Prado is a doctoral candidate whose research in- Broadwell, Petraeus resigned as the CIA Director terests include collective contemplation enabled by con- aer major FBI investigations. temporary communications technology, news portrayals of The FBI and Justice Department recom- people with disabilities, and convergence culture. mended bringing felony charges against Petraeus, saying that while CIA director, he provided classi- Boya Xu is a doctoral candidate whose research interests fied information to Broadwell, whom the New York include media effects, audience studies, public sphere in Times described as his lover and mistress. Ultimate- the digital era, and political communication. ly, Petraeus was convicted of non-felony mishan- dling of classified materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 07/07/2021 10:39:16 AM
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 07/07/2021 10:39:16 AM 07/06/21 Tuesday This material is distributed by Ghebi LLC on behalf of Federal State Unitary Enterprise Rossiya Segodnya International Information Agency, and additional information is on file with the Department of Justice, Washington, District of Columbia. Iran Hails ‘Good Progress’ in Second Talks With Rival Saudi Arabia, But ‘Complexities’ Remain by Morgan Artvukhina Iran and Saudi Arabia, which have postured as leaders of the world’s Shiite and Sunni Muslim communities, respectively, recently held a second round of negotiations in the Iraqi capital of Baghdad aimed at repairing their damaged relations, which have been broken since 2016. They come as Washington looks to change its Middle East policy. "Good progress has been achieved in these talks ... In some cases, disputes may have complexities that take time to resolve," Iranian government spokesperson AN Rabei told reporters at a Tuesday press conference in Tehran. The talks have so far mostly focused on Yemen, in which Saudi Arabia and its allies, including the Yemeni government-in-exile, have been waging war against the Zaidi Shiite movement Ansarallah, also known as the Houthis, since 2015. Tehran has given its political support to the Houthis, but the extent to which it might have materially supported the movement has never been adequately demonstrated. Nearly half a million people have died in the war, mostly due to a Saudi blockade and the destruction of infrastructure. “We still believe that dialogue, especially among the societies of the Muslim Ummah, is the only decent solution in resolving their differences,” Rabei said, using the Arabic word for the worldwide Muslim community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Humanitarian Impact of Drones
    THE HUMANITARIAN IMPACT OF DRONES The Humanitarian Impact of Drones 1 THE HUMANITARIAN IMPACT OF DRONES THE HUMANITARIAN IMPACT OF DRONES © 2017 Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom; International Contents Disarmament Institute, Pace University; Article 36. October 2017 The Humanitarian Impact of Drones 1st edition 160 pp 3 Preface Permission is granted for non-commercial reproduction, Cristof Heyns copying, distribution, and transmission of this publication or parts thereof so long as full credit is given to the 6 Introduction organisation and author; the text is not altered, Ray Acheson, Matthew Bolton, transformed, or built upon; and for any reuse or distribution, these terms are made clear to others. and Elizabeth Minor Edited by Ray Acheson, Matthew Bolton, Elizabeth Minor, and Allison Pytlak. Impacts Thank you to all authors for their contributions. 1. Humanitarian Harm This publication is supported in part by a grant from the 15 Foundation Open Society Institute in cooperation with the Jessica Purkiss and Jack Serle Human Rights Initiative of the Open Society Foundations. Cover photography: 24 Country case study: Yemen ©2017 Kristie L. Kulp Taha Yaseen 29 2. Environmental Harm Doug Weir and Elizabeth Minor 35 Country case study: Nigeria Joy Onyesoh 36 3. Psychological Harm Radidja Nemar 48 4. Harm to Global Peace and Security Chris Cole 58 Country case study: Djibouti Ray Acheson 64 Country case study: The Philippines Mitzi Austero and Alfredo Ferrariz Lubang 2 1 THE HUMANITARIAN IMPACT OF DRONES Preface Christof Heyns 68 5. Harm to Governmental It is not difficult to understand the appeal of Transparency Christof Heyns is Professor of Law at the armed drones to those engaged in war and other University of Pretoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Indien – China – USA: Das Neue Mächtedreieck Asiens
    Indien – China – USA: Das neue Mächtedreieck Asiens Heinrich Kreft1 1 Die Entstehung eines neuen Mächtedreiecks in Asien seit Ende des Kalten Krieges Das Ende des Kalten Krieges führte nicht nur in Europa zu erheblichen politischen Veränderungen und Machtverschiebungen, sondern auch in Asien. Hinzu kam, dass zeitgleich mehrere Länder und Regionen Asiens einen beispiellosen wirtschaftlichen Boom erlebten. 1.1 Der Untergang der Sowjetunion Der wichtigste Einzelfaktor für die Veränderung der politischen Landschaft in Asien war der Zusammenbruch der Sowjetunion und das sich daran anschließende Schwin- den des russischen Einflusses in Südasien. Die UdSSR war lange Zeit der wichtigste Verbündete Indiens gewesen, festgeschrieben im indisch-sowjetischen Vertrag von 1971, in dem Moskau Indiens Schutz garantierte. Allerdings wurde dieses Abkom- men bereits Ende der 1980er-Jahre durch die Bemühungen Gorbatschows unter- höhlt, die sowjetischen Beziehungen zu China zu verbessern. Die Russische Förde- ration als Rechtsnachfolger der Sowjetunion war Anfang der 1990er-Jahre kaum noch in der Lage, den sowjetischen Einfluss in Südasien aufrecht zu erhalten. Der ökonomische Niedergang Moskaus ging auch nach dem Zusammenbruch der UdSSR weiter, die russische Marine war nie in der Lage, die Rolle ihrer sowjeti- schen Vorgängerin im Indischen Ozean zu übernehmen. Die indisch-russischen Beziehungen laborieren auch heute noch an den Folgen der Auflösung der Sowjetunion, mit der Indien seinen bis dahin wichtigsten politi- schen und auch ökonomischen Partner verloren
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy, Strategic Interests & U.S. Foreign Policy in the Arab World: A
    1 The University of Washington Bothell Democracy, Strategic Interests & U.S. Foreign Policy in the Arab World: A Multiple Case Study of Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan & Saudi Arabia Kelly Berg A Capstone project presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Policy Studies through the School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences June 2015 2 Abstract What determines U.S. foreign policy in the Arab world? In order to address this question, an inductive multiple case study of Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia was conducted. These four Arab countries were selected due to their varying political positions and relationships with the U.S. I argue that the U.S.’s prioritization of strategic interests trumps or, in some cases, stifles support for the democratic process within the context of U.S. foreign policy in the Arab world, and that “democracy” is only advocated for when it serves U.S. desire for stability and hegemony throughout the region. Examining Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia demonstrates that political stability in the region, resistance to terrorism and unrest, Israel’s interests, and economic gains through oil and weapon production and sales are the U.S.’s key priorities. The results of this study will contribute to the existing literature by providing a comprehensive assessment of complex interdependence and political incongruences in U.S. foreign policy in the Arab world. 3 Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor and mentor, Professor Karam Dana, whose encouragement, advice, wisdom, and support proved to be invaluable to my academic journey.
    [Show full text]
  • 1601Qus China.Pdf
    Comparative Connections A Triannual E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations US-China Relations: Navigating Friction, Forging Cooperation Bonnie Glaser, CSIS/Pacific Forum CSIS Alexandra Viers, CSIS The South China Sea remained the most contentious issue in the US-China relationship in the early months of 2016. North Korea’s fourth nuclear test and missile launches posed both a challenge and an opportunity. After two months of intense consultations, the US and China struck a deal that led to unprecedentedly tough sanctions on Pyongyang. Xi Jinping attended the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington DC at the end of March and held a bilateral meeting with President Obama. Their joint statements called for cooperation on nuclear security and climate change. Relations between the militaries hit a snag as Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter postponed a planned visit to China and Beijing rejected a request for a US aircraft carrier battle group to visit Hong Kong. Talks continued on a bilateral investment treaty, but China failed to submit a new “negative list,” leaving prospects uncertain for concluding a BIT by the end of Obama’s term. South China Sea continues to cause friction Tensions between the US and China over the South China Sea simmered throughout the first four months of 2016 as a ruling neared in the case brought by the Philippines against China over Beijing’s maritime claims. The first episode took place at the end of January when a US guided- missile destroyer, the USS Curtis Wilbur, conducted a freedom of navigation (FON) operation within 12nm of Triton Island in the Paracel Island chain.
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project JOHN RATIGAN Interviewed by: Ray Ewing Initial interview date: August 17, 2007 Copyright 2008 A ST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born in New York, raised in Minnesota Dartmouth College Yale law school Marriage Entered the Foreign Service in 1973 Peace Corps, Tanzania, Teacher 19-.- Training, Colum0ia Teachers College Tanzania economy Environment Class-work Chinese 1elations with 2S Em0assy Denver, Colorado, 3aw practice -1973 Teheran, Iran, Consular Officer 1973-1975 Immigrant visa cases Security Oil economy Assassination attempts Family Student visas Am0assador 1ichard Helms State Department, Operations Center 1975-197- State Department, 6reek Desk Officer 197--1978 Forged ca0le incident 6reek-Americans 6reek Em0assy 1elations 1 State Department, FSI9 Political-Economic study 1978 Singapore, 6eneral Officer 1979-1982 Am0assador 1ichard :neip Staff Congressional visits Environment Consular operations 1efugees Strict law enforcement ASEA conferences State Department, FSI9 Ara0ic language training 1982 Cairo, Egypt, Consul 6eneral 1982-198. Environment Em0assy compound Visa pro0lems 2S Am0assadors American tourists Washington, D.C., Pearson Fellow for Senator Pearson 198.-1985 Senate Immigration Su0committee California growers> influence Proposed legislation killed Fraudulent visa cases Visa Waiver Pilot Program I S/State relations Pearson program Congress/State relationship State Department, Bureau of 1efugee Affairs 1985-1987 Monitoring expenditures
    [Show full text]