REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 FOREWORD
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dear reader, The Robert Carr civil society Networks Fund (RCNF) is a unique partnership between Sincere thanks are given to all RCNF grantee networks civil society and donors with a focus on international civil society networks in the HIV for sharing their results and answering to additional response. This par tner ship is embodied in its governance structure with an International questions from the staff of Aids Fonds, enabling Aids Steering Committee (ISC) consisting of both civil society representatives and donors Fonds to proudly present the results, experiences and and the Program Advisory Panel (PAP) with experts from civil society. lessons learned in the third year of RCNF funding. The processes of the High Level Meeting on Aids in June 2016 and the UNGASS on This report is in memory of the remarkable life Drugs in April 2016 show the importance of international civil society networks that and work of Robert Carr. share information, advocate at the international level and give support to national civil society organizations. Country- and local-level community-based activities are often dependent on the ability of global and regional networks and organizations to build capacity, identify and share best practices, form effective coalitions for advocacy, and to share information. The current discussions on transition in Middle Income Countries, the recognition of the rights of Key Populations and the narrowing space left for civil society organizations in many parts of the world make that there is an important role to play for international networks in the coming years.
In line with efforts to professionalize the fund, the ISC appointed Sergey Votyagov as the new Fund Director as of August 2016. Sergey comes to us with vast experience from the Eurasian Harm Reduction Network with an impressive track record of developing and leading public health advocacy strategies and partnership building in politically challenging environments.
2015 was the third year of the Robert Carr civil society Networks Fund. To date the fund launched three open calls. An additional closed call invited grantees to participate in the RCNF partnership with the Global Fund to fight Aids, TB and Malaria. In the first three years, the ISC – in consultation with the Program Advisory Panel (PAP) – formulated key priorities, developed innovative new models such as the consortia model, and developed policies designed to professionalize the fund. A successful replenishment round in 2015 resulted in donors recommitting funding for the period 2016-2018.
Through consultations with our stakeholders and partners, the ISC identified the Fund’s strategic priorities for 2016 and beyond. Our foremost priority is to keep investing in and strengthening the involvement of civil society in the RCNF. Alongside this critical work, it is of the utmost importance that the Fund continues to improve the evidence base of its added value in countries and at the international level. To live up to that ambition, the Fund is in the process of redesigning its monitoring and evaluation frameworks and is working hard on improving the visibility and brand of the Fund.
We approach our new funding round with huge amounts of energy, enthusiasm, ambition and a renewed vigour based on our plans and priorities for the near future. In 2016, we celebrate three successful years, and move forward confidently based on the lessons we have learned. For this, we owe a debt of gratitude to all the people who work so hard to help us realize Robert Carr’s vision and contribute to the Fund’s success.
Michel Kazatchkine Sigrun Møgedal Chair of the International Vice-Chair of the International Steering Committee Steering Committee
2 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 FOREWORD 3 ACRONYMS
ABDGN African Black Diaspora Global CSWC Caribbean Sex Worker ISC International Steering PCB Program Coordinating Board Network Coalition Committee PEPFAR US President’s Emergency ACA Africa Capacity Alliance CTO Community Treatment ISPs Inadequately Served Plan for AIDS Relief ACHIEVE Action for Health Initiatives Observatories Populations PLHIV People Living with HIV/AIDS AGM Annual General Meeting CVC Caribbean Vulnerable ITPC International Treatment PMU Project Management Unit ALFEA Association For Licensed Communities Coalition Preparedness Coalition PNC+ People Living With HIV Foreign Employment Agencies DFID UK government’s Department ITPC–EA International Treatment Networks Consortium AMAL Human Development Network for International Development Preparedness Coalition East PrEP Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis AMSHeR African Men for Sexual Health ECOM Eurasian Coalition of Male Africa PRs Principle Recipients & Rights Health JUNIMA Joint United Nations Initiative PUD People who Use Drugs ANPUD Asian Network of People who ECUO East Europe and Central Asia on Migration Health and HIV in PWUD People who use drugs Use Drugs Union of PLWH Asia RCNF Robert Carr civil society APCOM Asian Pacific Coalition on Male EECA Eastern Europe and Central KASH Keeping Alice Societies Hope Networks Fund Sexual Health Asia KESWA Key Affected Populations REDLACTRANS Red Latinoamericana y del APCOM Asia Pacific Coalition on Male EHRN Eurasian Harm Reduction Health and Legal Rights Caribe de personas trans Sexual Health Network KPs Key Populations RfP Requests for Proposals APN+ Asia Pacific Network of People EKHN Eastern European Key LAPS Latin America Platform of Sex RVLT Routine Viral Load Testing Living with HIV Population Health Network Workers SCN Standing Committee on APNSW Asia Pacific Network of Sex ENPUD Eurasian Network of People LGBTI Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Nutrition Workers Who Use Drugs Transgender and Intersex SRHR Sexual and Reproductive APTN Asia Pacific Transgender EWNA Eurasian Women’s Network on LGBTQI Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Health and Rights Alliance Network AIDS Transgender, Queer, SWAN Sex Workers’ Rights Advocacy ARASA Aids and Rights Alliance for FIDA Federation of Women Lawyers Questioning and Intersex Network Southern Africa FMA Fund Management Agent LWF The Lutheran World Federation SWIT Sex Workers Intervention Tool ART Antiretroviral Therapy FPM Fund Portfolio Managers MARPS Most At Risk Populations TALC Treatment Advocacy and ASWA African Sex Workers Alliance GAMCA Gulf Approved Medical MCA Members of County Assembly Literacy Campaign ATTTA Asociacion Travestis Centres Association MENA Middle East North Africa TBEC Tuberculosis Europe Coalition Transexuales Transgeneros de GIN Global Interfaith Network MIC Middle-Income Countries TG Transgender Argentina GNP+ Global Network of People MoU Memorandum of ToT Training of Trainers CARAM Coordination of Action living with HIV Understanding UNDP United Nations Development Research on AIDS and Mobility HRI Harm Reduction International MSM Men who have Sex with Men Programme CBO Community-based HYLF HIV Young Leaders Fund MSM&T Men who have Sex with Men & UNGASS UN General Assembly Special organization IAM Inclusive Affirmative Ministries Transgender Sessions CCM Country Coordinating IATT Inter Agency Task Team MSMGF The Global Forum on MSM & UNIBAM United Belize Advocacy Mechanism ICAAP Internal Capital Adequacy HIV Movement CCMs Country Coordinating Assessment Process MTR Mid-Term Review UNYPA Uganda Network of Young Mechanisms ICW International Community of NFM New Funding Model People Living with HIV&AIDS CCMs Country Coordinating Women living with HIV NGO Non-Governmental WCC World Council of Churches Mechanisms ILGA International Lesbian, Gay, Organization WHO World Health Organisation CDS Chief of the Defence Staff Bisexual, Trans and Intersex NOPE National Organization of Peer WLHIV Women Living with HIV CEGAA Centre for Economic Association Educators World YWCA The World Young Women’s Governance and AIDS in Africa ILO International Labour NORAD Norwegian Agency for Christian Association CFM Corruption, Fraud or Organization Development Cooperation YKAP Young key affected population Mismanagement INERELA+ International Network of NSWP Networks of Sex Worker YKP Young Key Populations CHESA Community Health Education Religious Leaders Living with Projects Services & Advocacy or Affected by HIV and AIDS OAS Organization of American CRN+ Caribbean Network of People INPUD International Network of States Living with HIV People who Use Drugs PANCAP Pan Caribbean Partnership CSO Civil Society Organization IRGT International Reference Group Against HIV and AIDS CSO’s Civil Society Organizations on Transgender Women and PAP Program Advisory Panel CSS Civil Society Strengthening HIV/AIDS PATA Pediatric AIDS Treatment in Africa
4 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 ACRONYMS 5 CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION: 5 CHAPTER 5: FUTURE DIRECTIONS 41 WHERE COMMUNITIES LEAD, NO ONE IS LEFT BEHIND 9 5.1 Key Strategic Directions 41 1.1 Civil society networks best capable of reaching those most in need 10 5.1.1 Achieving balance across the 4 objectives 41 1.2 Wide-ranging support in the midst of great unmet demand 10 5.1.2 Expanding the amount of available resources while maintaining 1.3 Alignment and Coordination 11 core values 41 5.1.3 Shaping the structure and direction of civil society responses through funding 42 2 GRANT PORTFOLIO 13 5.1.4 Ensuring flexibility in the funding process to respond to emerging issues 42 5.1.5 Improving communications among grantees and RCNF partners 42 2.1 Key changes in RCNF funding rounds 13 2.1.1 The Consortium Model 14 2.2 RfP 2013 – Grant period 2014-2015 15 6 ANNEXES 43 2.2.1 Inadequately Served Populations 15 2.2.2 Grantee expenditure 15 Annex 1 Grant portfolio 2014-2015 44 2.2.3 Regions 16 Annex 2 Grantees 47 2.3 2014 Closed RfP - Partnership with GFATM 16 Annex 3 Results Framework 64 2.4 2015 RfP - Grant portfolio 2016-2018 17 Annex 4 Theory of Change 70 Annex 5 RCNF income and expenditure 2015 71
3 CHAPTER 3: IN-DEPTH RESULTS 21
3.1 Background 21 3.2 Outcome Area 1: Results in Global and Regional Network Capacity 22 3.2.1 Organizational Development and South-to-South Technical Assistance 22 3.2.2 Increased Collaboration and Synergy 23 3.3 Outcome Area 2: Enhancing HIV Response Implementation 23 3.3.1 Improved Alignment between Government and Civil Society on Service Delivery for ISPs 24 3.3.2 Influencing policy with use of evidence 25 3.4 Outcome Area 3: Human Rights Advocacy 25 3.4.1 Fulfillment of basic human rights 27 3.4.2 Data Gathering, Litigation and Legal Support 27 3.4.3 Creating an enabling environment to protect the health and human rights of ISPs 28 3.5 Outcome Area 4: Resource Investment and Accountability for Response 28 3.5.1 Influencing HIV Response Financing 29 3.5.2 Budget Analysis and Tracking for influencing Policy 29 3.5.3 Transitioning 30 3.6 Added value of RCNF Funding 30 3.6.1 RCNF Program Funding 30 3.6.2 RCNF Care Funding 30 3.7 Engagement ISP community and civil society organizations 33 3.8 Grantee Lessons and Challenges 34 3.9 RCNF Lessons and Challenges 34
4 CHAPTER 4: FINDING NEW PARTNERS 37
4.1 Funding gaps 37 4.2 Funding civil society is a key strategy 37 4.3 Replenishment process 38 4.4 New investments in the RCNF 38
6 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CONTENTS 7 1. INTRODUCTION WHERE COMMUNITIES LEAD, NO ONE IS LEFT BEHIND
We are pleased to report that in 2015 the Robert Carr civil society Networks Fund (RCNF) supported fourteen civil society networks and consortia to mobilize, organize, coordinate, collaborate and inform to help the Fund reach its goal of Getting to Zero. The 2015 Annual Report shows how the scope, scale and ambition of RCNF-funded initiatives have resulted in demonstrable and positive impact on the lives of those most affected by the HIV epidemic. The following chapters offer an overview of 2015 activities, expenditure and outcomes, as well as case studies that showcase network accomplishments around the world.
RCNF was launched in July 2012 as an urgent reaction to reductions in funding for HIV, persistent human rights THE ROBERT CARR CIVIL SOCIETY abuses against Inadequately Served Populations (ISPs)1 NETWORKS FUND (RCNF) and a strong corresponding push for greater coordination amongst civil society stakeholders. The The Robert Carr civil society Networks Fund slow pace of change in political and funding (RCNF) focuses on Inadequately Served environments meant that in many parts of the world, Populations (ISP). ISP are key populations that Inadequately Served Populations (ISPs) continued to be face a higher HIV risk, mortality and/or morbidity at a higher risk of HIV infection, illness and death but and who at the same time have less access to often faced daunting barriers to treatment, prevention information and services. Inadequately served and suppor t ser vices. In this context of rapidly dwindling populations are disproportionately affected by resources, global and regional civil society networks HIV, with a million new infections a year among acting as critical representatives, advocates and men who have sex with men, people who use coordinators of such communities started ‘falling drugs, prisoners, sex workers and transgender through the cracks’ of existing financing mechanisms, people. - that is half the total worldwide many suffering acute restrictions on their work, and even closure. There was clearly an urgent need to protect and support the most under-served, vulnerable and disenfranchised communities affected by HIV.
RCNF is a custom-built solution to protect and support the most under-served, vulnerable and disenfranchised communities affected by HIV. Our mission is to enable global and regional civil society networks to scale-up access to prevention, treatment, care and support and 1 ISPs are key populations that face a higher HIV risk, death and/or illness, yet to protect the rights of ISPs. Civil society networks play have less access to information and services and include people living with HIV, gay men and other men who have sex with men, women and men who a crucial role in addressing barriers to universal access use drugs, prisoners, sex workers and transgender people. ISPs also include
© Aids Fonds / Credit: Adriaan Backer to HIV-services: they provide training and capacity women and girls, youth, migrants and people living in rural areas.
8 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 INTRODUCTION 9 OUR Without sustained increases in funding, the RCNF will • Partnership: the RCNF actively collaborates with ISSION not be able to expand its roster of grantees or assist donors and civil society networks working to end Strengthen the voice HIV/AIDS of people who face networks further than covering a proportion of core a higher risk of costs. Many of our grantee networks rely on a basic • Possibilities: the RCNF provides both HIV and have less access to level of RCNF funding for core operations. With programmatic and core funding to global and information and additional financial resources from the RCNF, they regional civil society networks. OUR services. VISION could have sustained capacity to scale up programs • Priorities: the RCNF serves communities and OUR Getting to zero. that are delivering positive change to communities, populations most in need of effective HIV A ITION ero new infections countries and regions (see Chapter 4). prevention, treatment, care and support. Strong and influential zero discrimination local regional and and zero IDS • Predictability: the RCNF makes grants that allow glo al networks. related deaths. In order to ensure renewed commitments from current networks and sub-grantees to be secure about donors and to encourage commitments from other their future, and plan accordingly. OUR potential donors, the RCNF undertook a replenishment STRATEGY process in 2015. As of 2016, the RCNF’s donors and Provision of funding to Inadequately Served Population networks for core support p a r t n e r s i n c l u d e t h e N o r we g i a n A g e n c y f o r D eve l o p m e n t interventions and internal capacity uilding. Cooperation (NORAD), the UK government’s Department for International Development (DFID); the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief “THE ROBERT CARR (PEPFAR); the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Global Fund to CIVIL SOCIETY fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. NETWORKS FUND ENSURES THAT 1.3 ALIGNMENT AND COORDINATION THE VOICE OF building, support their members with locally relevant 1.2 WIDE-RANGING SUPPORT IN THE MIDST OF services, and can have a powerful influence on national GREAT UNMET DEMAND The RCNF aims to complement global efforts to meet THOSE WHO NEED resource conversations. Networks also play a strong key UNAIDS and Global Fund strategies. We remain role in advocacy by enabling leadership from The RCNF made great strides forward since our committed to achieving balance between the Fund’s SERVICES ARE communities and populations most affected by HIV and inception four years ago. Contributions from our donors four outcome areas by: actively advocate for their human rights. When properly have allowed us to invest approximately US$18.3 million HEARD THROUGH resourced and supported, networks are able to influence through 38 grants in the first two funding rounds (grant • Improving global and regional network capacity STRONG AND important policy developments at global, regional and periods 2013, and 2014-15). For the current funding • Enhancing HIV response implementation national levels that often lead to more successful and round (2016-2018) an additional US$24,4 million has • Supporting human rights advocacy EFFECTIVE GLOBAL efficient national and local programs – delivered by been allocated to 18 grantees. Under the partnership governments as well as civil society. Our work is still in between RCNF and Global Fund, 8 grantees received • Increasing resource accountability for the HIV AND REGIONAL its infancy and there is much more to be done to ensure additional funding (see chapter 2). The RCNF has response that communities lead and no one is left behind. expanded its grant portfolio to cover ever wider NETWORKS.” geographies and reached greater numbers of Support for civil society networks represents the best Inadequately Served Populations. and most effective means of delivering positive and long-lasting changes at a community level. Direct 1.1 CIVIL SOCIETY NETWORKS BEST CAPABLE Interest and demand have exceeded expectations and support to civil society in the HIV response has produced OF REACHING THOSE MOST IN NEED available funds - a situation that indicates the level of remarkable results since the beginning of the AIDS unmet need in communities most affected by HIV. The epidemic and ending the epidemic requires a significant The RCNF is the first international fund that specifically RCNF was able to fund about 20% of all eligible grant i n c r e a s e i n f u n d i n g f o r a d v o c a c y, c o m m u n i t y m o b i l i z a t i o n aims to strengthen civil society networks across the applications and successful grantees received, on and services for communities directly affected by AIDS. world responding to HIV because they play a crucial average, only 54% of requested funding due to resource The added value of the RCNF is evidenced through the role in addressing barriers to universal access to HIV- limitations. Under the funding round for 2014-15, the values and principles that underpin its work: services. RCNF focuses on civil society networks total amount requested from applicants considered because they are led by and represent the people most eligible for funding exceeded $108 million, indicating a • Precedence: the RCNF is the first international affected by the HIV epidemic and have the best reach sizeable funding gap of around $90 million. fund that specifically aims to strengthen civil into and impact at community level. society networks across the world.
10 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 INTRODUCTION 11 CHAPTER 2 GRANT PORTFOLIO
The RNCF has issued 3 open and 1 closed Requests for Proposals (RfP) rounds and cumulatively allocated almost US$49 million since its inception in 2012. In this report, we outline the grants resulting from the different open RfPs and also the closed 2014 RfP round within in the framework of the partnership between RCNF and the Global Fund which aimed to significantly improve initiatives for capacity development and community mobilization. Working closely with donors and partners, the RCNF is continuously improving and refining its processes to identify high quality proposals and has introduced new models to incentivize better coordination and encourage greater collaboration between networks.
2.1 KEY CHANGES IN RCNF FUNDING ROUNDS In 2014, the RCNF partnered with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM). Since 2012, RNCF’s 3 open Requests for Proposals 8 grantees of the 14 grantees already receiving RCNF (RfP) and 1 closed have cumulatively allocated over support in 2014/15 were selected to expand and US$ 49 million to regional and global networks and strengthen meaningful engagement of key populations consortia of regional and global networks. Development (as defined in The Global Fund Key Populations Action of the consortium model, extension of project periods Plan 2014-2017) across Global Fund related processes and the introduction of a closed RfP, reflect both our and platforms (see par 2.3). agility and commitment to creating the appropriate funding environment for maximum impact.
Total grant ammount Total grant ammount Total grant ammount $ 5,519,016 $ 13,998,971 $ 24,485,000 Number of grants Number of grants Number of grants 24 grants 14 grants 18 grants
17 regional networks 5 regional networks 6 regional networks 7 global networks 9 consortia of networks (representing 4 networks) 12 consortia of networks (representing 5 networks)
FIRST OPEN RFP (2012) SECOND OPEN RFP (2013) THIRD OPEN RFP (2015)
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
CLOSED FUNDING ROUND Partnership RCNF and GFATM
Total grant ammount $ 4,957,580 Number of grants 8 grants
2 regional networks 6 consortia of networks (representing 2 networks) © Aids Fonds / Credit: Adriaan Backer
12 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CHAPTER 2: GRANT PORTFOLIO 13 RCNF was set up to fund the activities of global and 2.2.2 Grantee expenditure regional networks that support ISPs. The 2013 RfP “THE CONSORTIUM PROVIDES 2.2 RFP 2013 – GRANT PERIOD 2014-2015 A positive indication of good financial management (grant period 2014-2015) introduced the consortium systems and capacity is that overall spending of RCNF model to stimulate greater coordination and A UNIQUE MECHANISM FOR In 2014 and 2015, the RCNF supported 5 regional grantees over 2014/15 has been 95% of the allocated collaboration among global and regional networks SOLIDARITY – ENABLING networks and 9 consortia of networks. These networks grant amount. The total grant amount for 2014 and 2015 working on similar activities with similar populations. NETWORKS TO COME are key players within the global civil society movement was US$ 13,998,971 and the total expenditure US$ The funds’ goal was to strengthen and streamline the TOGETHER AND SPEAK OPENLY, for HIV, working in critical geographic regions to provide 13,361,880. Forty-three percent of the expenditure was aggregated civil society response to HIV. BUILDING UNITY AGAINST THE support for priority ISPs (see Annex 1, Annex 2 and diverted to core support. The provision of core funding CHALLENGES FACING THEIR chapter 3 In-Depth Results). The following sections is central to the strategy of RCNF as it enables networks As a consequence, the total number of grants has provide an overview of the 14 grantees,their t o r u n e ff e c t i v e o p e r a t i o n s a n d e v o l v e t h e i r o r g a n i z a t i onal decreased since 2012, but the total number of regional COMMUNITIES.” beneficiaries, geographical focus and expenditure. structures to support increasingly effective responses and global networks receiving grants through consortia Consortium of MSM Networks to HIV at global, regional and country level. has increased significantly as a result of the Fund For the 2013 funding round, a total grant of US$ incentivizing the development of consortia of networks. 12,248,395 went to nine consortia of networks and Figure 3. Expenditure 2014-2015 Prioritizing the consortium model for funding responded The overwhelming consensus was that the consortium US$1,750,576 went to five regional networks. Regional directly to a need for greater coordination amongst civil model added value and provided significant opportunities networks and network consortia grantees represent 53 society stakeholders. Since the first open RfP, project for strengthening and streamlining the global civil society regional and global networks. The nine consortia of periods have been increased from one year to three response to HIV. Grantees also reported that predictable networks alone represent 48 regional and global years, which provides a more predictable flow of and core funding supported the development and networks, demonstrating the incredible reach and alance funding to the grantees. evolution of internal network infrastructure helping capacity of our grantees. $ 637,091 networks to grow in effectiveness and thrive. Individual networks were made less vulnerable to changing donor Figure 1. Types of networks 2.1.1 The Consortium Model patterns. The consortia model offered networks In the 2014 Mid-Term Review and the Grantee Meeting opportunities to formalize and consolidate existing penditure 16 $ 13,361,880 in May 2015, grantees provided the following feedback partnerships, as well as vital space for coordinating and 14 on the key opportunities and challenges of this funding collaborating across the globe. Global and regional Regional networks 12 model. networks working with the same ISPs were motivated to $ 1,750,576 collaborate, reducing duplication and waste and 10 leveraging complementary strengths. Networks were 8 Consortia of networks KEY CHALLENGES also able to share learning, skills and experience. The 6 $ 12,248,395 consortium model stimulated considerable alignment of 4 Figure 4. Core versus programmatic expenditure Grantees reported that the consortium model involved advocacy agendas between national, regional and global 2 complex application, planning, communication and networks increasing the scope and solidarity of 0 coordination processes. A key challenge at country movements. level was balancing broad, global advocacy campaigns with specific, local needs which required significant With RfP 2015, RCNF took measures to address some of 2.2.1 Inadequately Served Populations changes to the relationship between the lead the challenges reported by consortia. Expectations of The RCNF aims to address critical factors for scaling-up organization (usually a global network) and the partners. the lead organization of a consortium and what it entails access to prevention, treatment, care and support and to Programmatic At an operational level, lead organizations invested have been clearly defined and consortia were required to protect the rights of Inadequately Served Populations. In e penditure Core e penditure significant management and administrative time and sign a Memorandum of Understanding which described 2014 /15, activities addressed People Who use Drugs, $ 7,567,456 $ 5,794,424 resources for application, coordination, communication, the standards and working processes for decision- People Living with HIV, Women Living with HIV, Men coordination and reporting. making and internal accountability. Consortia were having Sex with Men, sex Workers, Transgenders, Young required to develop and implement policies and People, LGBTI, prisoners and Further populations procedures on corruption, fraud and mismanagement (including Migrants and Religious leaders). KEY OPPORTUNITIES and whistle-blowing. Applicants were permitted to include costs for consortia management in the budget. The Consortium of MSM Networks, produced an interesting ‘Case Study on the added value of our work Figure 2. Inadequately Served Populations 2014-2015 as a Consortium’, which includes evidence on the “THE CONSORTIUM MODEL 8 added value of working together as a Consortium. It HAS ALLOWED ALL PARTNERS 7 highlights multiple examples of how working in a 6 Consortium has benefited member networks and MSM TO WORK BETTER WITH KEY 5 and transgender communities in general and multiple PARTNERS AND DELIVER JOINT 5 5 4 lessons learnt. PROJECTS AND ADVOCACY 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 EFFORTS.” 2
The Harm Reduction Consortium 1 1 1 0 PWUD PLHIV WLHIV MSM Sex Workers Trans Further Youth LGBTI Prisoners
14 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CHAPTER 2: GRANT PORTFOLIO 15 2.2.3 Regions The RCNF aims to work at the global and regional level SUCCESS STORY 2.4 2015 RFP - GRANT PORTFOLIO 2016-2018 GLOBAL LEVEL to create positive impacts at the national level. Since many of the grants are awarded to global consortia, The consortium of ARASA and ITPC, commissioned In 2015, the RCNF launched its third open Request for • Continued mobilization of MSM and transgender most of the grants cover multiple regions and multiple the Centre for Economic Governance and AIDS in Proposals (RfP) for the 2016-2018 grant portfolio. The people to end the HIV epidemic ISPs. The work of the consortia also addresses ISPs in Africa (CEGAA) to conduct research on the 2015 RCNF received 42 eligible applications for the 2015 RfP • Global mobilization and organization of women middle income countries (see Chapter 5) where the national budgets in Botswana, Malawi and (compared to 58 eligible in 2013). The review process to living with HIV majority of people living with or at greatest risk for HIV Tanzania in order to support the development of identify high quality networks was peer-led. External • Continued mobilization of sex workers against are to be found. key messages related to domestic health financing reviews by nearly one hundred expert peers and a HIV advocacy implemented by partners in the 3 rebuttal opportunity by the applicants are part of the countries. The three research reports were proposal evaluation process. The Program Advisory • Development of a new generation of HIV summarised in policy briefs, which were Panel (PAP), an independent advisory board charged treatment activists disseminated nationally along with a media with managing review of applications, uses external peer • PLWH monitoring HIV spending and holding their 2.3 2014 CLOSED RFP statement on the National Day of Action on reviews to deliver sound and balanced recommendations governments to account - PARTNERSHIP WITH GFATM sustainable health financing, in each country to the International Steering Committee (ISC). • Positive policy changes related to drug use and (October/ December 2015). In Botswana a petition, harm reduction In 2014, The RCNF joined forces with the Global Fund to based on the policy brief was submitted to the In defining a new portfolio for the RCNF, the PAP • Continued involvement and representation of Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) to ensure Parliamentary Sub Committee on Health ( 10 prioritised consortia and global networks over regional drug users in the HIV response action on their shared commitment to expand and December, International Human Rights Day) and networks and existing grantee networks over new strengthen meaningful engagement of key populations was attended by 10 media houses. A major applicant networks. The PAP was also guided by the • Development of global consortia working to end across Global Fund related processes and platforms. outcome of this strategic engagement by the key RCNF portfolio principle that funding should follow the HIV criminalization This partnership is one of three special initiatives of the populations groups, was the allocation of epidemic, based on our ethos of not leaving people Global Fund. The RCNF issued a special (closed) request resources for interventions targeted at key behind. RCNF’s new portfolio thus reflects the priority for proposals with an initial grant total of US$2,478,790 to populations in Botswana. Nana Gleeson from issues and regional focuses relevant to ISPs. The RCNF REGIONAL LEVEL RCNF grant recipients from the 2013 RCNF funding BONELA explained that: “Being able to feed into confidently expect that the portfolio will show a spread round. Eight proposals were awarded (2 to regional the development of the budget and performance of expected results over its 4 outcome areas, described • WLHIV engaged in policy change processes networks and 6 to consortia of networks). In total, the framework, ensured that it stayed true to the in the Introduction, that are universally defined as related to their needs and rights grant covers 31 regional and global networks. proposed activities as described in the approved critical to a strengthened civil society response to the • Continued mobilization of YKP against HIV concept note during grant making, especially for HIV epidemic. The partnership ensures that communities on the ground the Key Population and Community Systems • Development of spaces created for dialogue with are adequately supported to mobilize effectively for a Strengthening modules. As a result now in The PAP recommended 18 proposals for funding to the faith based leaders and community on stigma quality HIV response and successful roll out of the Global Botswana, over 26% of the total Global Fund ISC for three years (2016-2018) (see overview on next and discrimination towards LGBTQI Fund New Funding Model (NFM)2. The collaboration Grant allocation is for key population programming page and Annex 5). The ISC approved and ratified the • Transgender people engaged in policy change contributes, through focused and strategic investment, (Sex workers, MSM and transgender persons), recommendations of the PAP in December 2015. Part of processes related to their needs and rights to progress in longer term capacity development and interventions towards the creation of an enabling the funding has been insecure for a while since Norad, • A regional consortium of PLHIV, MSM and harm community mobilization. This program provided a point legal environment and community systems one of RCNF’s donors, faced considerable funding reduction networks monitoring HIV spending and of convergence for the 8 RCNF grantees, some of which strengthening. Considering that there was before cuts. In response, the last 6 months of third funding holding their governments to account were already implementing activities related to the Global 0% allocation for key populations and only U$200 year were awarded conditionally. Fortunately, the total Fund with their constituencies. 000 in the HIV grant for creating an enabling legal amount of funding from Norad was eventually reinstated. environment, this is a significant improvement.” The 8 grantees focused on increasing knowledge and The new grant portfolio supports a range of ISPs understanding of Global Fund processes, procedures ensuring coverage and impact in all regions of the world and opportunities for engagement in communities, as (see geographic overview on next page). Thirteen of the well as the skills of communities to meaningfully engage fourteen grantees networks supported in 2014/15 will in those processes (see progress report 2015). In 2016, continue to receive support via one or more grants. the Global Fund will continue the partnership with RCNF Three of the first year grantees (RfP 2012) made it back to further support the 8 grantees. into the list of selected grantees to build on the investments made. With the new grant portfolio the RCNF is investing in strengthening track record, impact on the ground and meaningful cooperation. Several networks applied in different organizational constellations, actively seeking out the best partners for maximum impact and spread of results. The funding decision rewards efforts towards complementarity and alignment.
With the support of the 18 selected networks, the RCNF will contribute to the following results: 2 The Global Fund has changed its funding model in order to make a bigger impact on the three diseases. The new funding model was designed to have predictable funding, to reward ambitious vision, to work on more flexible timings and with a smoother, shorter process that ensures a higher success rate of applications.
16 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CHAPTER 2: GRANT PORTFOLIO 17 GEOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW OF RCNF NETWORKS 2016-2018
R C N
CONSORTIA O NET OR S REGIONAL NET OR S
ITPC ARASA C P N C I A 10 ITPC G GNP IA I N R L C S T C N L L A HIV AIDS N 10 S G Y P 2 Y LEAD INERELA S N C I C E E P H N NS P HIV 10 IC G E HN
E R C A P T N C V C C EHRN 2 APTN CVC T H R C T C N P L A C N T P IDPC U D 2 INPUD REDLACTRANS HIV G C P C C A R AIDS ARASA 2 PATA CARA A
18 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CHAPTER 2: GRANT PORTFOLIO 19 CHAPTER 3 IN-DEPTH RESULTS
In this chapter, key results across the 4 RCNF Outcome Areas are presented, highlighting trends in activities and outputs, and outlining challenges for the future. The outputs and activities of the regional and global networks and consortia represent a remarkable body of work in both range and depth. These results, gathered from the reports and publications of RCNF grantees, provide more evidence for the strategic importance of the Fund and the populations it aims to serve and support.
3.1 BACKGROUND South technical assistance and increased collaboration and coordination within consortia and networks as well RNCF is in its fourth year of operation and is in a position as between them. The case studies consistently to start reporting on the short and medium-term demonstrate the impact of improved network capacity outcomes outlined in the RCNF Theory of Change (see on the 3 other outcome areas. Annex 4). It is important to note that RCNF grantees are at different stages of organizational maturity – some Outcome Area 2 focuses on enhancing HIV response networks, which existed before RCNF was created, are implementation by improving alignments between able to account for results related to longer term government and civil society for improved service outcomes, whereas other networks are beginning to delivery to ISPs and by influencing policy through develop the set of skills and capacities which underpin evidence and activism. The interventions highlighted the delivery of successful results. demonstrate innovative examples of networks supporting the meaningful participation of ISPs to This chapter includes in-depth results across the ensure that global, regional and national services and 4 RCNF Outcome Areas, showcasing examples of policies are improved and inclusive. Inclusivity is at the projects and interventions from across the grant heart of Outcome Area 3 which aims for the fulfillment portfolio: of basic human rights for ISPs and addresses punitive legal frameworks. RCNF grantees have made O1: Global and Regional Network Capacity extraordinary efforts in mobilizing legal support to O2: Enhancing HIV Response Implementation address discrimination, sometimes facing very hostile policy and legal environments. They have improved O3: Human Rights Advocacy awareness and influenced policies to protect the rights O4: Resource Investment and Accountability for of ISPs and they forcefully campaigned against Response criminalization and repressive policies.
Outcome Area 1 is foundational to the other three Outcome Area 4 promotes activities that improve outcomes. Building capacity in incipient networks is a organizational capacity and skills to understand and critical start on the road to success. For more participate in the structures and processes of key donor established and mature networks, building and agencies. It also supports efforts to influence and strengthening capacity, developing robust governance monitor funding decisions and mechanisms to ensure and improving operational standards and procedures is appropriate allocation of resources. the key to continuous improvement and organisational sustainability. Networks benefit from RCNF core Looking across the range of grantees’ intervention, funding to develop capacity but also learn from each there are unmistakable trends that grantees are other: the RCNF consortium model specifically developing strategies and activities based on a clear promotes and facilitates collaboration and the provision understanding of gaps and needs. of technical support from established networks to the This chapter concludes by outlining the added value weaker or more recently established networks. RCNF is and impact of RCNF core funding as well as some key
© Aids Fonds / Credit: Adriaan Backer especially pleased to report on examples of South to challenges for the future.
20 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CHAPTER 3: IN-DEPTH RESULTS 21 based organization within the African region. Relationships between consortia and networks are also 3.2 OUTCOME AREA 1: RESULTS IN GLOBAL Three interns (from Botswana, Zambia and “IT WAS USEFUL THAT MIDNIGHT growing and improving: AND REGIONAL NETWORK CAPACITY Kenya) each conducted a three-week long internship at a partner organization in another [APCOM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR] • EECA region’s first joint Memorandum of country within the region (South Africa and VISITED STAKEHOLDERS WITH Understanding and Cooperation between 9 Service Resource Human MENA). US. IT WAS GREAT TO SEE regional key populations networks stands as a provision investment rights • The Consortium of MSM networks formed the HOW HE WORKS AND TO BE great example of expanding relationships first ever regional network of MSM in the MENA ABLE TO USE HIS APPROACH between other ISP Consortia and Networks. This CAPACITY BUILDING region. M-Coalition serves as a model for AS A MODEL. HE HELPED US is a partnership between the Consortium of MSM mobilizing MSM and transgender people in TO MAKE CONNECTIONS AND Networks in Eastern Europe and Central Asia regions where policy environments are (EECA), with the East Europe and Central Asian Within this outcome area, RCNF funding seeks to particularly hostile. TO NETWORK. IT GAVE US THE Union of PLWH (ECUO), Eurasian Harm improve the capacity of global and regional networks OPPORTUNITY TO SHARE OUR Reduction Network (EHRN), Sex Workers’ Rights and their membership to enable well-equipped, WORK. FOR EXAMPLE, WE Advocacy Network (SWAN), Eurasian Women’s representative and accountable civil society organi Grantees reported an encouraging number of examples HADN’T COLLABORATED WITH Network on AIDS (EWNA), Eurasian Network of sations to influence the delivery of effective responses of South to South Technical Assistance: UNAIDS BEFORE AND ARE NOW People Who Use Drugs (ENPUD), International to HIV. Secure long-term funding, coupled with financial Treatment Preparedness Coalition of EECA support for organizational and technical capacity • PNC+ identified areas where networks can STARTING TO.” (ITPCru), TB Europe Coalition (TBEC) and the building, creates spaces for coordinated and colla collaborate and provide South-To-South Representative of a national partner of EECA Regional HIV Legal Network. The purpose borative work across the globe, reducing duplication technical assistance within the consortium APCOM (partner in Consortium of MSM of the MoU is to facilitate changes in regional and leveraging complementary strengths. structure. GNP+ facilitated and developed a Networks) legal frameworks for the continuum of services program for APN+ to provide expertise on including HIV prevention, testing and treatment, The case studies below show different ways of Hepatitis C issues and intellectual property and HIV-related TB and Hepatitis C; to advocate expanding and strengthening collaboration, sharing providing much-needed technical assistance to for increases in state funding to support a and learning to coordinate within the consortium or ECUO for their RCNF II project. 3.2.2 Increased Collaboration and Synergy sustainable continuum of HIV-related services; network and with other consortia and networks. • The regional network CVC provided technical RCNF funds worked as a catalyst, enabling synergy in and to improve access to legal assistance in the assistance to the United Belize Advocacy the field, improving effectiveness of networking, region and improve rights observance of people Movement (UNIBAM), forging new relationships strategizing and working relationships within and affected by the HIV/AIDS epidemic. 3.2.1 Organizational Development and with other CSOs working with ISPs. As a result, between ISP networks. The case studies below highlight • Redlactrans expanded and strengthened its South-to-South Technical Assistance CVC held a 2 day workshop in November 2015 some examples of growing and improving synergy collaboration with other ISP groups to align Grantee networks address growth and profes which highlighted the similarities and difference within consortia and networks: goals, strategies and activities for a strong voice sionalization of their own and partner organizations. In of MSM and Transgender populations and the to the general assembly meeting of the OAS. addition, they recognize each other’s strengths, importance of finding opportunities for working • IAM formed a partnership with CSOs that specialist areas, opportunities to create added value together, such as advocacy campaigns with specifically work with PLHIV in South-Africa, and promote south-to-south technical assistance: different strategies and messages. In addition, Zambia and Namibia based on transforming faith CVC supported the establishment of a steering communities and empowering LGBTI and PLHIV. 3.3 OUTCOME AREA 2: ENHANCING HIV • CARAM Asia and member organizations have committee of CSOs working with transgender IAM were instrumental in establishing the Global RESPONSE IMPLEMENTATION developed a transparent and accountable persons, lesbian women, sex workers, youth and Interfaith Network. IAM and GIN are planning to governance system. In Pakistan AMAL has MSM. The goal of the steering committee is to jointly organize a pre-faith conference at the 2016 established a Project Management Unit (PMU) World Aids Conference in Durban and the 50+ SERVICE Resource Human have an empowered and politically and socially PROVISION investment rights with dedicated staff members for effective strong LGBTI community in Belize. members aim to meet in a pre-conference to implementation. In order to maintain project and ILGA World Conference in November 2016. • For the Consortium of MSM networks, the central organizational accountability, CARAM and its Capacity building benefit of a Consortium is that it can house an • CFCGZero: WCC together with INERELA+, World members shared their assessments, planning easily accessible ‘bank’ of experiences, tools and YWCA, LBGTI individuals and young people and impact of projects with the beneficiary information which facilitates mutual learning, with organized public lectures given by religious organizations on regular basis, creating effective An important outcome of the RCNF is that ISPs are able members rarely needing to ‘start from scratch’. leaders living with HIV in Kenya, Ghana and improvement cycles based on experience, to influence HIV responses to improve access and quality Members learn from each other’s expertise e.g. Nigeria. These lectures aimed to build the observation and feedback. of prevention, treatment, care and support services. ABDGN on migration; IRGT on transgender confidence and capacity of staff and members of Communities always have been at the forefront of HIV • The ARASA/ITPC consortium developed stronger issues; APCOM in social media; or MSMGF in International Reference Group to highlight, invest responses and have played a crucial role in delivering internal communications through virtual and global advocacy. As the lead organization, and include adolescents, young people and services in partnership with or complementing health in-person meetings over the last two years, MSMGF disseminates documents, blogs and LGBTI transformative perspectives, their needs and social state service providers. In low-income allowing for improved joint activity planning and webinars developed by Consortium members and challenges in the action plan (2015-2021). countries, it remains particularly important to ensure that coordination. Furthermore, mutual understanding and external agencies and connects civil society Over 500 adolescents, young people including ISPs are not left behind in the HIV response. Meaningful regarding the consortium’s governance and representatives from the Consortium to other LGBTI individuals some living with HIV were able participation of ISPs at all levels can result in improved division of work have been established – which stakeholders. to interact face to face with faith leaders living will carry into future work under RCNF, as the with HIV, theologians and health service awareness and understanding among policy makers, consortium moves into 2016. The consortium’s providers. donors and other key stakeholders of ISP service needs. internship exchange program, carried out in Such awareness and understanding will allow regional August 2015, developed capacity and and global networks to influence change to ensure partnerships between activists and community- global, regional and national health related policies are improved. This requires a complex web of activities
22 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CHAPTER 3: IN-DEPTH RESULTS 23 including gathering and sharing evidence, exploiting key 3.3.2 Influencing policy with use of evidence 2015, a SWIT Case Study was published in opportunities for advocacy and policy work and “A REALLY BIG VICTORY OF English reflecting the development and impact of investment in building relationships and skills with the • Using information from regional community SWIT. The SWIT provides guidance to national relevant stakeholders. OUR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY consultations, ITPC/ARASA implemented a policy makers and programme managers in Within this Outcome Area, networks and consortia are WAS THE OPENING OF A campaign to scale up the roll out and use of implementing evidence and rights-based taking significant steps forward in successfully SECOND OPIOID SUBSTITUTION Routine Viral Load Testing (RVLT). The campaign programmes with and for sex workers. advocating for and delivering improvements in services THERAPY SITE IN RIGA, LATVIA. started with a background survey on access to for ISPs; as well as gathering and using evidence to IT WAS SO UNEXPECTED FOR viral load testing carried out by community inform policy and service development. The examples US.” research teams in 12 countries. Data on the “THE SWIT IS MY BIBLE, IT below highlight a strong preference towards partnership current use of routine viral load testing and approaches working with other CSOs, networks, Yuris Ekstains, leader of ‘Doors’, people implementation barriers was gathered from VALIDATES EVERYTHING government, service providers and ISPs. using drugs initiative group (Harm policy makers, service providers, recipients of WE ARE DOING, AND HELPS Reduction Consortium) treatment and care and representatives of NGOs. FINE-TUNE WHERE WE ARE The findings of this survey were published in an LACKING.” 3.3.1 Improved Alignment between Government issue brief titled “Routine For You, But Not for Gavin Jacobs, Sisonke, NSWP Member. and Civil Society on Service Delivery for ISPs • Argentinean Redlactrans member ATTTA Me” that was presented at the IAS 2015 in RCNF grantees report that regional and global ISP provides drop-in centres for transgender-specific Vancouver. Informed by the outcomes of the representatives are well informed and positioned to HIV testing and free treatment. It is a model for all national surveys, country teams developed articulate the service needs of ISPs and have been member countries. The secretariat supports national advocacy plans to promote increased successful in demanding improved ISP services at other network members to establish these access to RVLT and/or to address IP barriers to national and local levels: services in their regions/countries. The model promote increased availability of second and 3.4 OUTCOME AREA 3: HUMAN RIGHTS has been successfully used in 4 countries. third line ARVs. In order to support and amplify ADVOCACY national level advocacy, ITPC and ARASA • CARAM Asia member AMAL in Pakistan • The PNC+ member APN+ strengthened the launched a regional campaign called ‘Be Healthy collaborated with network groups and capacity of national PLHIV networks to advocate organizations, government level advocacy groups – Know Your Viral Load’ with a march in October Service Resource HUMAN on issues around HIV/Hepatitis C co-infections provision investment RIGHTS 2015 in Lusaka, Zambia led by TALC, a local and individuals to bring change in service and SRHR. One of the results was the fast- partner. The campaign received regional and delivery for migrants as ISP and succeeded in tracked registration of Sofosbuvir in Indonesia, global visibility through presentations and events Capacity building reaching migrants with more comprehensive, Nepal and Pakistan; migrant friendly HIV testing procedures, at ICASA 2015 in Zimbabwe. • In Zambia, as a direct result of the ARASA/ITPC treatment and care. CARAM Asia member SDS in • ITPC has established treatment observatories in consortium ‘Be Healthy – Know your viral load Sri Lanka successfully advocated for more several regions to systematically collect and Criminalization and other legal oppression of ISPs campaign’ launch held in the capital city of ethical and migrant friendly testing practices by analyze qualitative and quantitative data to be including violence, human rights abuses, which Lusaka and subsequent meetings with the government clinics to uphold the rights of used for targeted advocacy on access to contribute to stigma and discrimination against ISPs, Treatment Advocacy and Literacy Campaign migrant workers. treatment. ITPC West Africa’s community their families and partners act as formidable barriers for (TALC), the Zambian Ministry of Health issued a treatment observatories (CTO) collected data on universal access. Criminalisation is particularly • In 2015, the Consortium of MSM Networks met directive to all ART facilities instructing the state of treatment, with emphasis on stock outs pertinent for drug using, sex worker, MSM and with local authorities in Paraguay (MSM facing immediate uptake of viral load testing. In support in Côte d’Ivoire, The Gambia, and Sierra Leone. transgender ISP groups which are often targeted with social homophobia and stigma), to present the of the anticipated increase in viral load testing, Findings were used for regional, national and discriminatory laws and policies. The combination of experiences and results achieved through the the Ministry has committed to procuring viral local advocacy. As a result, 150 community strong local networks and meaningful representation of activities of the Men’s Wellness Center load testing machines for all provinces. As of treatment advocates were trained to understand ISPs within regional and global networks is essential to “Kuimba’e”, the first men’s wellness centre in March 2016, several clinics have already reported ARV management issues and strengthen their ensure that human rights violations and punitive laws South America, providing free clinical care, the scale up of routine viral load testing. testing, treatment and vaccines, with a special capacity to successfully operationalize and CTO; and policies are addressed at the national level. emphasis on services related to HIV and STI operational CTOs now alert critical ARV stock Increased collaboration between national, regional and prevention. As a result, the consortium and the levels and management (mismanagement) issues global networks makes it possible that examples of Central Department government of Paraguay “WE DID NOT KNOW HOW in each of the three countries. human rights violations feed upwards, downwards and across networks as evidence for policy and advocacy agreed on jointly expanding these community- SUCCESSFUL THIS WOULD • ICW contributed to the consultation and dialogue work on human rights protection and equal access to oriented services for gay men and other MSM. BE. I AM HAPPY TO SAY WE that led to the World Health Organisation (WHO) quality services. Activities of the RCNF grantees that • EHRN provided technical support to 14 PUD to release guidelines on when to start ART and HAVE ACHIEVED A LOT; FROM have contributed to this outcome include stakeholder organizations and groups in their local advocacy PrEP. The guidelines reflect an understanding of SEVEN VIRAL LOAD MACHINES dialogues and workshops hosted on human rights, activities for access to harm reduction services: the practical needs of people living with HIV as TO 37 AND FROM SEVEN lobbying and advocacy to parliamentarians and policy- the Kazakhstan Network of Women Living with well as key and vulnerable populations including makers on discriminatory bills and laws and legal HIV and Affected by HIV ensured local REFERRAL LABS TO EIGHT. THE younger women and adolescent girls at high risk support for ISPs affected by rights violations. Under governmental funding for gender-sensitive GOVERNMENT HAS NOW GIVEN of HIV acquisition. Further, the recommendations this outcome area, we highlight case studies which services for women using drugs in Republic of EACH COUNTY A TARGET FOR are based on strong evidence from clinical trials evidence interventions for data gathering and legal Kazakhstan. Community leaders from Latvia, indicating that with early treatment, HIV VIRAL LOAD TESTS, WHICH support; improved awareness and influencing policy Lithuania, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, transmission risk is lowered and the initiation of SHOWS THEY HAVE ALSO designed to protect the rights of ISPs; and activities Montenegro, Russia, Slovenia and Uzbekistan PrEP is effective in preventing HIV acquisition. TAKEN THE ISSUE UP.” designed to address repressive laws and policies. successfully advocated for the access to quality Patricia Asero Ochieng, DACASA, Kenya • NSWP launched The Smart Sex Worker’s Guide harm reduction services and access to opioid (ITPC-ARASA) to SWIT (Sex Workers Intervention Tool) in all substitution treatment; NSWP languages in August 2015. In December
24 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CHAPTER 3: IN-DEPTH RESULTS 25 • With RCNF funding, Redlactrans has been able “MY COUNTRY, INDONESIA, to increase its visibility and gain a stronger position in the region. Representatives of all IS KNOWN FOR KILLING network members were able to attend the PEOPLE WHO USE DRUGS assembly of the OAS (Organization of American IN COLD BLOOD. THIS States) in Washington to interact with national APPROACH HAS CREATED politicians on the issues of gender identity law. FEAR FOR PEOPLE WHO USE The network claimed a minor but significant DRUGS AND PUSHES THEM victory by getting the OAS secretariat to put AWAY FROM HEALTHCARE, gender identity names on conference badges. INCLUDING HIV AND HARM REDUCTION SERVICES. THE 3.4.2 Data Gathering, Litigation and Legal IMPLEMENTATION OF THE Support COUNTRY’S POLICY IS WORSE THAN THE DRUGS ITSELF.” • The INPUD/ANPUD Consortium undertook four regional consultations with representatives of 24 Edo Augustian PKNI Indonesia drug user organisations from 28 countries. These (INPUD-ANPUD Consortium) consultations allowed for a documentation of violations of human rights of people who use drugs globally; 3.4.1 Fulfillment of basic human rights • APTN released a report on the health and human rights of transgender people in the Asia-Pacific • The Caribbean is one of the regions with the region. The “Blueprint for the Provision of worst laws, policies and regulations for Comprehensive Care for Trans People and Trans Inadequately Served Populations. Eleven Communities in Asia and the Pacific” points to Caribbean countries criminalize consensual sex the significant barriers trans people face, between adults of the same sex. All countries in highlights important progress in some countries, the English-speaking Caribbean criminalize sex and calls for sustained efforts to improve the work. ISP concerns in the Caribbean are often legal and social status of trans people across the ignored or disregarded by National and Regional region. The report provides information about the HIV/AIDS programs. The consortium of MSM current health and human rights situation for networks, in collaboration with other Caribbean trans people in Asia and the Pacific, including based partners, advocates for removing the legal clinical advice for meeting the health needs of barriers to be able to advocate effectively and trans people. The Blueprint was developed as a improve access to health and justice for ISPs. partnership between APTN, UNDP, and the Training events, attended by representatives of USAID- and PEPFAR-funded Health Policy 30 organizations with a total attendance of 68 Project. The Pacific Sexual Diversity Network was participants, have led to regional partner involved in the process to ensure that the voices organizations increasingly becoming human and experiences of Pacific trans people are rights advocates and representing their network visible, alongside those of trans women, trans and/or country at regional and international high men and third gender people from all parts of level meetings. A number of Country Asia. The Blueprint builds the case for changing Coordinating Mechanisms (CCMs), including laws, policies, and practices so that trans people those in Jamaica, Guyana, Belize, as well as the are able to participate fully in every country and PANCAP Regional Coordinating Committee, have community across the region. APTN will increased the representation of MSM, document how people use the Blueprint and any transgenders and other ISP on their committees. progress achieved on the policy considerations • The sex worker networks consortium member listed in the report. SWAN undertook a mapping of social and legal • CARAM Asia member ACHIEVE in the Philippines services and trained sex workers to document provides legal redress in relation to HIV-related human rights abuses in Tajikistan and discrimination which has been lacking in the Kazakhstan. National reports formed the basis national HIV and AIDS response. ACHIEVE for advocacy on decriminalisation of sex work mobilized and capacitated lawyers and legal and prosecution of perpetrators of violence. The service providers in academic and alternative perceived risk to partner Apeiron (Tajikistan) legal organizations. Those who attended these being closed resulted in limited public events and capacity building programs became part of a advocacy. network of HIV-related legal redress providers called Aid4AIDS. ACHIEVE’s work was used as the reference for UNAIDS contracting a lawyer to © Aids Fonds / Credit: Adriaan Backer
26 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CHAPTER 3: IN-DEPTH RESULTS 27 look into the development of a redress challenges and needs of ISP to access services. The 3.5.2 Budget Analysis and Tracking for mechanism for HIV-related stigma and “MY ENVIRONMENT IS NOT A improved capacity and alignment of advocacy agendas influencing Policy discrimination with migrant workers. SAFE SPACE FOR ME. IN THE between national, regional and global networks will RCNF grantees recognize that for successful advocacy • ACA/FIDA/NOPE Consortium contributed to legal lead to CSO and stakeholders monitoring, analyzing for sufficient and targeted investments, data and building representation for ISPs was enhanced with the MINDSET OF THE SOCIETY and influencing investments. the capacity of communities to provide evidence on the identification/ mapping and training of pro-bono OF MY COUNTRY, BEING gaps and needs are essential. lawyers in Kenya (8), Uganda (4) and Tanzania (7) HOMOSEXUAL IS A WESTERN who are willing and able to represent ISP cases. THING, SO THE COMMUNITY 3.5.1 Influencing HIV Response Financing • At the Melbourne AIDS Conference APCOM The lawyers will be taking up cases affecting USES NEGATIVE FORCE, SUCH launched a discussion brief on ‘The state of ISPs as they arise. • The MSM Networks Consortium’s members have investment in HIV prevention for MSM in Asia and AS INSULTING COMMENTS. promoted the involvement of MSM and the Pacific’. This brief includes a selection of data • The ACA/FIDA/NOPE Consortium through FIDA EVEN IN THE HEALTH SECTOR, transgender communities in decision-making and graphics that speak volumes about the Kenya is currently assisting KESWA, regarding a THERE IS A LOT OF IGNORANCE bodies for the Global Fund. MSM representation urgent need to invest in targeted HIV ban on sex work by the Nairobi Members of on the Country Coordinating Mechanisms programmes for MSM, and showed that the road County Assembly (MCA). FIDA Kenya identified ABOUT LGBTI. COMBINED WITH (CCMs) in Georgia and Azerbaijan for the first to equitable and evidence-based investment may this as a public interest litigation case that will THE STIGMA SURROUNDING time. Similarly, the Consortium has supported the be longer for some countries than for others. support ISPs in Kenya, particularly sex workers HIV AND AIDS AMONG HEALTH CCM in Paraguay to become more accountable; Working with UNAIDS, APCOM will develop a (which is still ongoing). CARE PROVIDERS, IT IS the development of the Jamaica Civil Society ‘Regional Investment Case’ for MSM to be DIFFICULT FOR LGBTI CITIZENS Forum helped reform the CCM, including launched in 2017. 3.4.3 Creating an enabling environment to TO APPROACH HEALTH securing a civil society Chair. Meanwhile, many • The consortium of MSM networks finished and protect the health and human rights of SERVICES ABOUT SEXUALLY members have supported MSM and transgender published an extensive report on the involvement ISPs RELATED PROBLEMS, communities in Country Dialogue and Concept of MSM and Transgender people in the EECA EITHER PSYCHOLOGICAL OR Note processes. Due to close and active region, which shows that MSM and trans people • CARAM member ACHIEVE (Philippines) was able PHYSICAL.” involvement of the MSM Networks Consortium in were, in most cases, unable to contribute their to bring together a network of service providers the Russian Country Coordinating Mechanism, expertise and share their experiences within the Lady Tabengwa from Botswana. collaborating to provide legal support for people 19% of the Global Fund grant has been context of the Global Fund country dialogue and living with HIV who experienced discrimination earmarked to MSM-related services and other national HIV/AIDS planning processes in due to their HIV status. This network includes advocacy. EECA countries. Likewise in Latin America, the lawyers, PLHIV community leaders and • EHRN, as part of regional campaign “Harm Consortium found that there are few cases of advocates, PLHIV-support CSOs, local- Reduction Works: Fund It!” organized a regional success, in particular, regarding community government-run HIV/STI clinics and HIV advocacy and partnership engagement event leaders involved in decision-making for budget treatment hospitals. CDS (Sri Lanka) developed a 3.5 OUTCOME AREA 4: RESOURCE INVESTMENT which brought hundreds of regional and national allocations. partnership with the Association For Licensed AND ACCOUNTABILITY FOR RESPONSE new partners both from governmental agencies • The Harm Reduction Consortium trained PUD Foreign Employment Agencies (ALFEA) to as well as from civil society, research and leaders in community-led budget advocacy. The advocate for more migrant friendly testing academy sector together for joint action to objectives of the training include building of practices by GAMCA clinics. Service RESOURCE Human ensure sustainability of the HIV response provision INVESTMENT rights understanding community’s role in advocacy • ACA/FIDA/NOPE Consortium building ISP financing. processes, specifics of the budget advocacy in organisational capacity contributed to CHESA • The Consortium of YKP Networks: Youth LEAD, the region, the main stages of the budget successfully advocating for the inclusion of MSM Capacity building through PACT, led the Resource Group to process and opportunities for engagement at the issues in the National Strategic plan, despite the influence funding of the Global Fund for young national and municipal levels. Besides a training high level of homophobia in Tanzania. In addition, people, the campaign called “Making the Money module they used a series of video-advocacy by KASH was successful in establishing strong Work for Young People in the HIV response”. The experts. With this outcome, RCNF aims at strategically targeted partnerships with the police service and health group with support from UNAIDS HQ and the GF and sufficient investments being available to deliver • The ARASA/ITPC Consortium examined the 2015 practitioners to promote sex worker’s health and developed the Global Fund Youth Guide, to results for ISP. Direct support to civil society in the HIV national budgets in Malawi, Botswana and human rights; enhance the understanding on the GF for young response has produced remarkable results since the Tanzania by analyzing the government allocations • The Harm Reduction Consortium report (2015): people. Youth LEAD developed the facilitator beginning of the AIDS epidemic and ending the to health as well as the HIV/AIDS and TB budgets “Law Enforcement and Women Who Use Drugs: toolkit to implement the youth guide which was epidemic requires a significant increase in funding for and programs, with the hope of finding and improving police relations and cooperation for successfully piloted in Honduras, Nepal and advocacy, community mobilization and services for scrutinizing resources allocated for HIV/AIDS better public health, community safety and Zimbabwe. communities directly affected by AIDS. To achieve this, interventions for ISP. The analysis showed that human rights protection” explains key issues regional and global networks of ISP groups require • Lobbying by the INPUD (Consortium with data are lacking on population size estimations faced by women who use drugs in their sustainable support to ensure active, informed and ANPUD) led the Global Fund secretariat to create for ISP and on resources and interventions interactions with law enforcement authorities in consistent participation (and support national ISP a Harm Reduction Working Group reporting to addressing ISP specific needs. The analysis Eastern Europe and Central Asia (EECA). stakeholders to engage) with governments and donors the HIV Disease Committee. The group, co- showed that all governments were heavily or fully in country, regional and global levels to influence chaired by INPUD and UNAIDS, provides the GF dependent on donors for funding. At country funding strategies. Activities which have contributed to Secretariat with overarching strategic level, the analysis resulted in a media briefing, a this result include training of ISP organizations in the suggestions and technical advice on individual Policy Brief and now forms the basis for structures and processes of key donor agencies, in grants that contain a harm reduction component. advocacy messages and recommendations to particular the Global Fund, and joint efforts to influence the government, for improving prioritization and and monitor funding decisions and mechanisms to resource allocation for ISP in the fight against ensure appropriate allocation to addressing the HIV/AIDS and TB.
28 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CHAPTER 3: IN-DEPTH RESULTS 29 3.5.3 Transitioning standing of processes, and influencing policy and are A key challenge for sustainable strategic HIV funding is being actively shared within and beyond the networks the withdrawal of donor and government HIV funding and consortia. Increasingly, within the consortium and from middle-income countries (MIC). To overcome the network structures, grantees use social media, e-list challenges in transitioning of the services from serve, e-learning, online communication and sharing international to domestic: platforms to provide information, announcements on relevant policy decisions made, alerts for action, • ITPC–EA met with the World Bank in Nairobi to guidance for advocacy and technical updates. urge them to reverse their decision to classify Kenya as a Lower Middle Income Country, as The consortium structures provide the opportunity to new status means reduced donor support and align advocacy agendas and amplify the voice of ISP high prices for life-saving drugs. communities. Grantees are becoming more skilled at • EHRN in 2015 held a regional consultation on using information on the gaps and needs from the sustainability and transitioning together with the community on the ground to create powerful and Global Fund. As a result of an analysis and joint meaningful messages. We observe grantees discussion by all key regional community documenting lessons learnt and best practices, networks and partners the sustainability and conducting country analysis and research to enable ISP transitioning framework was developed. communities to advocate for their specific agenda. The results show us that RCNF outcomes are mutually • The consortium of MSM networks collaborated in reinforcing, and that grantees are collectively on track relevant regions – such as Asia and the Pacific, to achieving the short-term and long-term outcomes. Latin America and the Caribbean, Eastern Europe and Central Asia and the Middle East and North Africa – to pool experiences of the impact of Global Fund and PEPFAR withdrawing from “CORE FUNDING PERMITS lower-middle and middle-income countries and SUSTAINABILITY OF OUR author policy position briefs. A specific example EFFORTS. AS IT BECOMES relates to the Global Fund’s release of their INCREASINGLY DIFFICULT Strategic Plan 2017-2022 late in 2015. The Consortium polled their constituencies across all TO SUPPORT CORE COSTS regions and collaborated together on THROUGH PROJECT GRANTS recommendations to submit to the Global Fund’s WHICH ALLOW SMALLER Board of Directors meeting in response, OVERHEAD PERCENTAGES, critiquing lack of ambition and specificity for AND LESS FUNDING AVAILABLE ISPs. IN GENERAL, THE RCNF CORE FUNDING GRANT CAN BE UNDERSTOOD AS SUPPORTING 3.6 ADDED VALUE OF RCNF FUNDING FUNDAMENTAL ASPECTS OF THE CONSORTIUM.” 3.6.1 RCNF Program funding Consortium of MSM networks Reporting by the grantees shows that RCNF program funding is supporting networks and consortia to implement activities that contribute to achieving the 4 outcomes in a balanced way. The in-depth results 3.6.2 RCNF Core Funding achieved by grantees are compelling examples that Provision of core funding from the RCNF is seen as a funding to strengthening networks results in significant key advantage of the Fund. Grantees mention the improvements in the lives of ISPs living with and at risk importance of longer-term core funding to give networks for HIV. and consortia value time and opportunity to build governance structures ; organisational capacity in A significant number of interventions highlighted above terms of resourcing, systems, operational processes, are aimed at addressing the ISP communities’ lack of and key relationships. We highlight the numerous ways enlightenment on their rights and opportunities to in which networks and consortia have used core funding engage in consultations for policy development. to build more resilient organisations and to achieve Interventions also address the capacity and skills of alignment of shared goals and coordination of ISPs to advocate for their specific agenda and monitor interventions to reduce duplication and improve commitments made on health financing and programs. efficiencies and sustainability.
In this project period, output of tools, manuals and technical guides has been prolific. These have been
developed for training, raising awareness and under © Aids Fonds / Credit: Adriaan Backer
30 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CHAPTER 3: IN-DEPTH RESULTS 31 Several networks and consortia used core funding to Consortium member networks as sub- • ICW has reclaimed key global spaces including at undertake strategic reviews and planning: “RCNF IS ONE OF THE FEW contractors. The process has led to UNAIDS, Global Coalition on Woman and AIDS, DONORS WHO ACTUALLY commitments of Consortium member networks UN Post 2015 processes, IATT and Global Fund • Core funding allowed NSWP to hire an to strengthen the organizational capacity of the • GFCGZero: The World YWCA was strongly Independent Consultant who undertook a wide CONTRIBUTES TO CORE members who were not quite meeting the advocating for issues related to young women, ranging consultation to inform the NSWP FUNDING. THIS ASSISTED US required criteria. Consequently, the Consortium HIV and SRHR to be included in the SDGs Strategic Review 2010-2015, the NSWP Strategic TREMENDOUSLY IN EXECUTING will work with these networks to expand their adopted by the United Nations in 2015. This was Plan 2016-2020 and the NSWP Monitoring and ALL OUR WORK CONCERNING policies around fraud, and to submit monthly a major achievement and attributable to many Evaluation Framework. PLANNING, FACILITATION, desk audits of financial activity and monthly partners and stakeholders. The specific • REDLACTRANS used core funding for expanding TRAINING CONCEPTIONS status reporting and/or verification of technical contribution of the consortium partners related to and improving its organisational structure, AND MONITORING AND progress to MSMGF for review. bringing the progressive discourse of faith and financial management system, formulated a new EVALUATION.” rights into the policy negotiating space. strategic plan and expanded the network to 16 • ACA/FIDA/NOPE Consortium built the capacity countries. A capacity analysis of national Inclusive and affirming ministries of The Most At Risk Populations (MARPS) networks identified areas for strengthening and 3.7 ENGAGEMENT ISP COMMUNITY AND CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS Network in Uganda (MNS); represented the civil provided support to develop sub-regional society in the sectoral committee to develop the strategic plans. National HIV AIDs Strategic Plan (2015-2019); An important role for the ISP networks and consortia is • INPUD was enabled to hold its AGM, at which the spearheaded the development of National Core funding has allowed networks and consortia to to mobilize and build the capacity for engagement with decision was made to move from an individual MARPs Priority Action Plan (2015-2018) by significantly tighten up governance structures and policy making and monitoring processes, so that ISP membership model to a regionally representative mobilizing, leading in consultations and processes to strengthen financial management and groups are effectively engaged in policy making structure, thus becoming a network of networks production of document that informs policy at accountability: processes at all levels. RCNF funding enabled some of people who use drugs. INPUD’s new Board Uganda AIDs commission; current member of grantees to be recognized as serious partners in the consists of elected representatives of each global MOH MARPs Taskforce where they provide • ACA: trained four ISP Networks, (MNS (Uganda), field, enabling more visibility of the ISP they represent region, as well as INPUD’s women’s network, was guidance on Key Populations contribution; UNYPA(Uganda), CHESA (Tanzania) and KASH and their rights: able to meet and have been trained on UK chairs, coordinates Uganda’s Global Fund (Kenya), in governance and leadership and governance. Country Coordinating Mechanism (CCM) for KPs development of governance plans to improve • NSWP: co-chaired the UNAIDS Steering • Core funding made it possible for Consortium of activities organizational processes by applying sound Committee on HIV and Sex Work with UNFPA Youth Networks to build organization structures, • INPUD/ANPUD Consortiums sustained accountability, reporting and compliance register as a legal entity. The governance and UNDP, developing an action plan for the roll systems. The Boards were trained in governance, out and scaling up of the Sex Worker engagement with UNAIDS and the UNAIDS PCB handbook of Youth LEAD was revised to throughout the process of developing the leadership, decision making, and risk strengthen the roles of board, governance Implementation Tool (SWIT). ASWA is part of management skills. Global Fund Southern Africa regional consortium thematic segment at the December 2014 UNAIDS mechanism and communication with the PCB on ‘halving HIV transmission amongst • RCNF core funding enabled INERELA+ to build the capacity of key populations’ countries. Operational guidelines were also people who inject drugs by 2014’ ensured that secretariat, which is based in Johannesburg, and networks. ASWA sits on UNDP’s Key Population developed. Similarly, the network members both INPUD and ANPUD had considerable input WCC based in Geneva, to coordinate program Regional Expert Group Fokus Muda (Indonesia), YKAP Nepal, Vectoring into the background paper and provided all of the implementation and support young women living • The Harm Reduction Consortium highlights two China developed their own governance speakers from the drug using community during with HIV as champions, advocates and decision key global achievement in the area of the mechanism (structures and policy) and the thematic segment. INPUD’s ED gave the makers internally within the organization. In liberalization of the drug policy and protection of established themselves as the national networks closing address at the session addition, core funding assisted the establishment of YKP in their respective countries. human rights of People who Use Drugs: Firstly, of three regional HIV and AIDS networks among Harm Reduction International assisted the UN • From the Consortium of YKP Networks, Youth • ITPC/ARASA: RCNF core funding facilitated the LEAD once again became the co-chair of the LWF member churches in Africa, Asia and Latin strategic development of the consortium’s Special Rapporteur on Right to Health, to draft America and the Caribbean. interventions to UNGASS on drugs and UN High regional Inter Agency Task Team (IATT) on YKP, activity framework and directly supported the which includes almost all the technical partners, • Core funding made it possible for APTN, a Commissioner for Human Rights report to the activities (and resulting outcomes). They have UN bodies and regional networks working on regional network to strengthen the governance UNGASS. Secondly, first ever Human Rights assisted the consortium to leverage new funding HIV. Youth LEAD drives one of the thematic areas mechanisms of the regional network secretariat, Council session on drugs where HRI and other opportunities and forged new and strategic on Advocacy with the Global Fund within PACT improve organization and financial management Consortium members spoke partnerships. It strengthened the relationship (the global alliances of young people working on structures, provide support to national networks, • CARAM Asia and the ILO are presently acting as between ITPC and ARASA, developing work HIV and SRHR) where HYLF Board member is enhancing the capacity of transgender. By rotating co-chairs of JUNIMA’s Steering plans together, jointly representing issues in co-chair. HYLF partnered with the WHO, UNICEF, conducting consultations with APTN members on Committee. The Joint United Nations Initiative on national, regional and global fora and in all, now UNAIDS and several NGOs and CBOs to develop key issues, network members built up cohesive Migration Health and HIV in Asia (JUNIMA) consider each other as core strategic partners; the Young Key Populations (YKP) briefs. WHO for relationships sharing the same goals. APTN was promotes universal access to HIV prevention, • Through RCNF Core Funding grant, the the first time produced technical briefs on YKP to able to successfully register as a legal entity and treatment, care and support for mobile and Consortium of MSM networks observed inform targeted intervention packages on establish a Board. migrant populations in South and South East expected positive evolutions in governance, risk preventions, treatment and enabling environment Asia and Southern China. In addition, awareness Core funding has also been used to expand networks management, and internal accountability. Several and advocacy activities on migrant worker’s HIV • Consortium of MSM networks’ members are and allowed some networks to register as legal entities. regional and global partners, including AMSHeR, related issues have become an integral part of represented on several key groups: CVC is a Network and consortia sub-grantees and members are ECOM, IRGT, M-Coalition and SCN have newly ICAAP member of the Pan Caribbean Partnership being supported to adopt robust systems and processes revised and more responsive governance against HIV/AIDS, as well as the HIV and Human that underpin accountability and transparency. structures. To better manage risk, the Rights Reference Group of UNAIDS; SOMOSGAY Consortium has expanded the financial is a member of the NGO Delegation to the assessment analyses for working with
32 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CHAPTER 3: IN-DEPTH RESULTS 33 Programme Coordinating Board of UNAIDS and • Bringing human rights violations to court means capacity to manage a network or consortium. has been invited to be part of the Latin America a risk of disclosure of the PLHIV’s status, being a The nature of the work includes an inherent official delegation of the Global Fund Board; and DU, SW, MSM, etc. This discourages ISP from element of risk for all RCNF partners: not all MSMGF is a member of the Community, Rights pursuing legal cases in court, even with free legal grantees and/or lead organizations are strong and Gender (CRG) Advisory Group of the Global support. and mature (one of the aims of RCNF is exactly to Fund and is convening in 2016 an Advocacy • Stigma and discrimination continue being major build the capacity of grantees). In 2015, four Platform to advise the Executive Director of root causes contributing to inaccessibility to cases of Corruption, Fraud or Mismanagement UNAIDS on issues relating to MSM and gay men. services. (CFM) occurred, which were immediately reported to the ISC and responded to in close collaboration with the lead organization. In one CONSORTIUM/NETWORK LEVEL case, the organization is currently involved in an 3.8 GRANTEE LESSONS AND CHALLENGES intensive process to improve organizational and • Developing and embedding planning, monitoring governance structures, closely monitored by the Future successes and sustainability depends on and evaluation, and reporting processes within FMA. In three cases, a forensic audit was proactive addressing of issues and risks, and learning the networks and consortium structure is conducted (all partners/members of a consortium from the pitfalls and breakdowns. Highlighted below, complex and time consuming. It is a challenge or network), of which one case is still under are key lessons learnt by grantees from implementation and needs the capacity of all members/partners investigation. In two cases, the forensic audit level and from consortia and networks. to be able to document and report on successes revealed that funds were spent unauthorized and/ they contributed to or unaccounted for and in both cases IMPLEMENTATION LEVEL • The role of the Lead organization represents a preparations for legal measures are underway. major commitment in terms of time, skills and Preventing and tracking CFM is a priority, • Some groups have to operate in very hostile resources. The lead organization faces the because funds are no longer available to support environments, where their work can be risky and, challenges to combine its role as an important grantees’ work in scaling-up services and sometimes, highly dangerous. Consortia can advocate for ISP health and rights issues with the protecting the rights of the ISP community. The enable networks to come together and speak administrative role within the Consortium. Fund has clear Due Diligence and CFM policies openly, building unity against the challenges Consortium partners also face extra in place (www.robertcarrfund.org) to discover or facing their communities. administrative requirements while working in a become informed of CFM cases as early as • Advocacy must be preceded with alliance consortium/network constellation possible, and also to respond. The CFM policy stipulates that, if necessary, in close building activities for the wider population to • Even within an established consortium there are collaboration with the grantee in question, an appreciate the plight of these groups because challenges in coordinating the work across external forensic audit will be commissioned and, there are still deeply entrenched negative regions/countries. Plans can and should be made if appropriate, legal measures will be taken and attitudes towards these groups even within the in advance of program work to help facilitate the funds unaccounted for reclaimed. In addition, mainstream human rights movement. communication across partners and highlight the 2015 RfP, consisted of additional and stricter • Advocacy for implementation of policy must to be opportunities for joint work requirements for applicants on risk management coupled with calls for essential commodities and • Building capacity, from South-to-South and/or and on preventing and handling CFM cases. This diagnostics and pressure on some governments strong to weaker organizations poses challenges, included an obligation to make certain to start considering using the TRIPS flexibilities because of differences in language, culture, contractual agreements between the lead and as a tool to increase access to essential context, use of social media and security issues partner/member organization and developing medicines. Civil society organizations in the CFM policies in line with the over-arching RCNF global South have in the past been relatively CFM policy. weak and uncoordinated in advancing the Intellectual property agenda, although change is 3.9 RCNF LESSONS AND CHALLENGES beginning to occur.
• Public policies and plans are still prescriptive • Working in a constellation of networks and with politically-driven agendas, with no analysis consortia of networks, with one lead organization on evidence and without consulting affected changes the formal relationship and dynamics communities due to absence or weakness of between the members and partners. The lead mechanisms to engage Community Service organization takes responsibility for the Organizations. monitoring, reporting and hence accountability, • The resistance among religious leaders to both internally as externally. Under the last address issues related to sex and sexuality. This Request for Proposals (RfP, June 2015) the is because sex and sexuality are considered additional challenge for the lead organization moral issues within the faith communities. (position, time wise, skills, etc.) was recognized • The right to health of migrants has not been and grantees were permitted to include looked at holistically, including full autonomy of management and overhead costs for leading the one’s own body and expression of sexual needs. network or consortium. In this context, human rights violations occur • RCNF organizes a thorough, peer-driven from state level (detention, deportation) and by selection process of grantees. Selection criteria employers against women. include contribution to RCNF overall goal and outcomes and also the actual or potential
34 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CHAPTER 3: IN-DEPTH RESULTS 35 CHAPTER 4 FINDING NEW PARTNERS
Although there is wide recognition that community responses must play an increasing role in addressing the epidemic in the years ahead, funding for community-based HIV responses remains incommensurate with demand. 2015 was therefore dedicated to increasing commitments to the Robert Carr civil society Networks Fund (RCNF). Existing donors were challenged to recommit and to increase their contribution. Other potential donors were invited to support civil society networks through the RCNF.
RCNF’s replenishment in 2015 efforts resulted in know this both from the sheer number of eligible commitments totalling more than US$ 29 million for the applications the RCNF received and their aggregated next three years, representing an increase of 17% from funding request (over US$ 72 million for 2016-2018). the inception of the fund. Replenishment results for The unmet demand from global and regional civil 2016-2018 until the end of 2015: society networks for RCNF funding is noteworthy:
• Replenishment activities commenced with DFID’s • US$ 38,721,059 after the first round of funding in renewed and increased commitment of 5 million 2012 3 GBP (US$ 7,600,000 ) for the period 2015-2018 • US$ 51,441,250 after the second round of funding • The U.S. Government almost doubled its first in 2013 funding cycle investment to US$ 9,345,794 • US$ 47,366,028 after the third round of funding in • The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation will invest 2015 US$ 3 million
• NORAD recommitted another 38 million NOK Spurred on by increasing call for support, the RCNF 4 (US$ 4,406,500 ) made concerted efforts towards a robust replenishment • The Ministry of the Netherlands announced with process in 2015 to ensure renewed and increased €3 million (US$ 3,300,000) to support the Fund commitments from RCNF’s founding donors and for an unprecedented five year commitment, encourage new commitments from other potential which is € 1,800,000 (US$ 1,980,0005) for the donors. Increasing our funding base is critical to period 2016-2018. supporting our alignment with Getting to Zero targets • The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Malaria and and securing the continued development and Tuberculosis will continue its partnership and coordination of regional and global networks. increased its support to the 8 RNCF grantees funded through this specific partnership in 2016 4.2 FUNDING CIVIL SOCIETY IS A KEY STRATEGY
4.1 FUNDING GAPS The world is on a Fast Track strategy to end the AIDS epidemic by 2030. After 30 years of the most serious The RCNF funds networks of ISPS at the forefront in the epidemic in living memory, countries need to deploy the global response to HIV. These networks play a vital role most powerful tools available, hold each other to in promoting innovation, developing leadership, account for results and ensure that no one is left behind disseminating information, linking stakeholders, to reach this visionary goal. advancing policy and supporting good practice. They
accomplish a great deal with relatively little funding, 3 Based on the exchange rate of 11 December 2015 which makes RCNF support good value for the money. 4 Based on the exchange rate of 11 December 2015. Due to currency exchange fluctuations this amount is lower than in the first three year funding cycle.
© Aids Fonds / Credit: Adriaan Backer Global and regional networks need more support. We 5 Based on the exchange rate of 11 December 2015
36 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CHAPTER 4: FINDING NEW PARTNERS 37 Many governments, donors and leading technical Figure 5. Donor commitments agencies increasingly agree that the full engagement of “THESE ARE THE ORGANIZATIONS civil society and Inadequately Served Populations is an 40,000,000 essential component of the HIV response, without THAT GIVE HOPE TO PEOPLE which the UNAIDS Fast Track targets cannot be met. AT THE GRASS ROOTS. LET’S 35,000,000 Significant investments are needed to support civil NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE 30,000,000 society and communities systems including global and POWER OF THE INDIVIDUAL 25,000,000 $ 29,027,157 regional networks that strengthen country level IN TACKLING AIDS. THAT’S 20,000,000 $ 24,715,381 responses. The need to fill funding gaps for ISP WHAT THESE COMMUNITY 15,000,000 networks remains urgent – UNAIDS estimates that to GROUPS ARE ABOUT, STANDING 10,000,000 achieve bold Fast Track HIV treatment and prevention 5,000,000 targets, investments must increase more than three- UP TO GOVERNMENTS AND 0 fold between 2015 and 2020. DEMANDING MORE. RESOURCES 2013-2015 2016-2018 FROM THE FUND ARE ABOUT RCNF is an ideal vehicle for understanding and LIFTING UP HUMAN BEINGS.” responding to the persistent funding gaps. RCNF is the The first funding cycle of the fund and it’s successful VS Ambassadeur Deborah Birx about the first international fund that specifically aims to replenishment process has increased recognition of RCNF strengthen HIV civil society networks across the world our work with civil society networks and awareness of and providing funding for both core and programmatic our brand. The RCNF is confident that our efforts and activities supporting inadequately served populations, achievements in 2015 will strengthen the 2016 the scale up of HIV prevention, treatment and support in preparation for the next round of grant making. We replenishment process. RCNF aims to use the services, and human rights protections. leveraged influential support, targeted high level opportunities presented by the High Level Meeting on meetings and arranged follow-up meetings with Aids in New York and during the International Aids Our analysis shows that without real term increases in potential donors. Conference in Durban in 2016 to further showcase our funding, the RCNF will not be able to expand its roster work to civil society networks, donors and potential of grantees and core funding for networks will diminish A highlight of the replenishment process was the RCNF donors. to unsustainable levels. Additional financial resources meeting during the 70th session of the UN General provided by RCNF donors allow networks to have Assembly in New York in September 2015. The event sufficient capacity to potentially fund and expand the brought together donor governments, private foundations programs that could enhance the organizational and civil society to attract more investment into the Fund. “NORAD SEES RCNF AS capacity of for instance MSM, transgender and sex The meeting was co-hosted by UNAIDS Executive AN IMPORTANT PARTNER worker networks; provide effective services to rural Director, Michel Sidibé and US Global AIDS Coordinator, IN ENSURING THAT THE populations and migrants; remove barriers to accessing Ambassador Deborah Birx. The achievements of the HIV RESPONSE WORKS medication; advocate against HIV criminalization; and RCNF were showcased throughout the meeting, and STRATEGICALLY TO REACH push the agenda for women’s rights. several participants representing civil society spoke of THOSE MOST IN NEED AND how they have benefited. These included the AIDS Rights If we do not Fast-Track the response in the next five Alliance of Southern Africa’s Felicita Hikuam and Gaj LEAVING NO ONE BEHIND. WE years, by increasing and front-loading investments and Gurung from Thailand’s Youth Lead. ARE HAPPY TO STILL BE ONE OF massively scaling up coverage of HIV services so as to THE KEY FUNDERS TO THE FUND, reduce the rate of new infections and AIDS-related During the meeting the U.S. announced a doubling of its AND WOULD HOPE TO GET MORE deaths, the epidemic may rebound in several low- and initial investment to US$ 9,345,794 and the Ministry of DONORS ON BOARD, NOT LEAST middle-income countries. the Netherlands announced to support the Fund with IN A TIME WHEN THE FUNDING €3 million. POTENTIAL IS MORE LIMITED THAN IT USED TO BE.” 4.3 REPLENISHMENT PROCESS 4.4 NEW INVESTMENTS IN THE RCNF Anne Skjelmerud, Norad – Member International Steering Committee The Robert Carr civil society Networks Fund was RCNF’s successful replenishment process in 2015 launched in July 2012 and 2015 was the last year of the resulted in recommitments from founding donors with initial three year funding cycle. A replenishment process sustained or increased financial contributions and a was launched in 2015 to expand the donor pool and new donor joining the pool (Dutch Ministry of Foreign increase investment in the RCNF. Affairs). In total, existing and new donors of the RCNF committed almost US$ 30 million dollar in new RCNF set out with three clear objectives for investments. However, to meet the ambitious targets replenishment: inspire potential donors with the laid out in the Fast Track strategy, RCNF must focus on operational model and accomplishments of the Robert raising funds in 2016 with renewed vigour. Carr civil society Network Fund; develop on-going communications with potential donors through one-on-one and group meetings and development of a robust communications plan; and secure donor commitments by December 2015 to support the RCNF
38 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CHAPTER 4: FINDING NEW PARTNERS 39 CHAPTER 5 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
The Robert Carr civil society Networks Fund was set up to ensure that communities are at the forefront of the HIV response so that no one is left behind. After 2 successful years, our Mid-Term Review (MTR) identified several issues and challenges that needed to be tackled for the Fund to be successful in achieving its goals. Many of these issues were addressed during the 2015 RfP but require on-going discussion and evaluation to inform RCNF’s strategic direction. Our consultation and strategic planning processes identified additional strategic questions related to defining the scope and priorities of the RCNF in scaling up the HIV response around the world.
In 2014-15, two International Steering Committee a d vo c a c y i s a l s o a n a r e a t h a t i s s i g n i fi c a n t l y u n d e r f u n d e d meetings and one community consultation delivered in the HIV response. several key principles across these 5 issues which will inform the strategic direction of the Fund within and Moving forward, monitoring and evaluation activities beyond the next three year funding cycle. will provide additional information about how RCNF allocations are balanced across the four outcome areas, the relationship between core and programmatic funding, and the impact of the work of RCNF grantees 5.1 KEY STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS on scaling-up access to HIV services and human rights protections for ISPs. 5.1.1 Achieving balance across the 4 objectives The RCNF and its grantees will continue to seek the 5.1.2 Expanding the amount of available most effective ways to engage ISPs in advocacy, service resources while maintaining core values delivery and social networks, and to prioritize and RCNF will take a more proactive approach in addressing provide core funding to global and regional networks persistent gaps in both overall funding needs and and consortia of networks led by and serving ISPs. support to particular populations and/or regions. The Core funding from the RCNF to build network capacity overall funding gap is considerable and without is seen as a key advantage of the Fund as it also furthers additional funding, the RCNF will not be able to fulfil its the other three RCNF objectives by contributing to the goals. Over the coming year, the RCNF will seek out effective functioning of global and regional networks additional information for a more sophisticated analysis and consortia. However, shortfalls in funding compelled of grantee funding needs; examining needs and grantees to shift much of their grant money toward core program costs by issue, population and region to costs. These networks have been strengthened as a encourage and incentivize the grantees to prioritizing result, but their programmatic efforts have remained and address those gaps. Program evaluation over the underfunded, compromising the ultimate the goal of next three years will provide valuable information improving the lives of ISPs increased access to regarding if and how such geographic and demographic prevention, treatment, and support services for HIV. gaps have been addressed and whether increased This requires a balanced funding portfolio across all capacity for underserved regions and populations has four RCNF objectives. Human rights violations led to increased access to and improved outcomes of disproportionately affect ISPs and their ability to access HIV services.
© Aids Fonds / Credit: Adriaan Backer HIV and other health care services. Human rights
40 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 CHAPTER 5: FUTURE DIRECTIONS 41 5.1.3 Shaping the structure and direction of civil 5.1.5 Improving communications among society responses through funding grantees and RCNF partners The RCNF funding process seeks to influence the ways In future, we will better use the unique structure of the in which global and regional networks collaborate and RCNF to foster learning among grantees, share key ANNEXES build infrastructure that serve global, regional, national lessons about the Fund’s areas of value-added, and and local needs. The goal is to develop more contribute to the global knowledge bank of the civil collaborative structures of efficient and effective society response to HIV. RCNF is involving grantees in networks that connect global and regional mobilization processes to improve the functioning of the Fund and efforts, reduce redundancy, and consolidate we are strengthening communication processes administration. Both the community consultation and between grantees. In 2016, grantees will have the the MTR concluded that the consortia model requires opportunity to share knowledge and experiences at the close, on-going attention to ensure that it enhances the International AIDS Conference in Durban and grantee effectiveness and efficiency of grantees. The ISC will meeting planned under the RCNF-Global Fund continue to review how this priority evolves over time in partnership. To improve monitoring and evaluation consultation with grantees. Implementation of the processes, the FMA will involve grantees and RCNF monitoring and evaluation framework will include on- partners in gathering evidence of the effectiveness and going investigation into the outcomes and impacts of added value of the RCNF to the HIV response. consortia prioritization.
As the RCNF increases the number of donors participating in the fund, the ISC will need to review how the RCNF continues to balance all donor needs, including donor requirements that may limit the use of funds, affect how grants are selected, or how grantees seek technical assistance and on the scope and methods of grantee reporting.
5.1.4 Ensuring flexibility in the funding process to respond to emerging issues An urgent development is the withdrawal of donor government HIV funding from middle-income countries (MIC) with the expectation that countries that can afford to do so will increase their domestic spending for the HIV response. A responsible transition policy is required as international financial support for the HIV response in MIC is reduced. However, even with increased domestic investment, in many countries there will remain a need to continue and scale up investments to support ISPs. A coordinated and successful transition to fuller domestic funding requires a continued and well-financed and independent role for civil society. Therefore, increased support for the RCNF is an important strategy for donor countries and other donors that are seeking to transition funding support away from MICs in a responsible way.
Monitoring and evaluation activities will provide further information about the impact of RCNF grantees on successful MIC transitions, ensuring equitable access to HIV services for ISPs within high-burden countries, and can examine how the RCNF works to identify and address emerging issues that may affect funding priorities and the activities of grantees. In low-income countries, it remains particularly important to ensure that ISPs are not left behind in the HIV response as countries attempt to further scale up access to treatment and prevention services within a changing and more limited funding environment.
42 REACHING INADEQUATELY SERVED POPULATIONS 2015 HOOFDSTUKTITEL 43 ANNEX 1 GRANT PORTFOLIO 2014-2015 Inadequately served Geographic region population frica sia Pacific MEN EEC WCE L C N l PW D PLHIV WLHIV a y S e T Y L Prisone r F Ea s W Ce n Southern South and Ea s ceania No r Middle Ea s Ea s W L No r lo al r atin out h/ Y K u r sia ansgender e s e s the r t t t th th me n t r t t TI ern Eu r
w
and Ce n merica and Cari ean al or k f rica merica f sia f rica pops rica s f rica / e r P f rica MSM t s ope and Ce n South Ea s
t r al Eu r ope t