DOCSLIB.ORG

Flood Risk Discovery Report Sacandaga Watershed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flood Risk Discovery Report Sacandaga Watershed REGION II DISCOVERY REPORT SACANDAGA WATERSHED | HUC 02020002 HAMILTON, FULTON, SARATOGA, AND WARREN COUNTIES* * These counties span more than one watershed; please see the following page for a list of communities fully or partially located in the watershed. This report covers only the Sacandaga Watershed. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Region II 26 Federal Plaza, Room 1807 New York, NY 10278 March 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS STUDY INFORMATION ......................................................................................................................................................................1 Project Area Community List .......................................................................................................................................................1 TERMS AND ACRONYMS ..................................................................................................................................................................2 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ......................................................................................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................................................................7 DISCOVERY OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................................................................8 DISCOVERY OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY ..................................................................................................................11 1. Identification of Stakeholders ...............................................................................................................................................12 2. Pre-Meeting Engagement and Information Exchange .............................................................................................................13 3. Discovery Meetings ..............................................................................................................................................................14 4. Post-Discovery Engagement..................................................................................................................................................15 SACANDAGA WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS AND GEOGRAPHY ...................................................................................................16 Watershed Disaster Declarations ..............................................................................................................................................18 Fulton County Overview ............................................................................................................................................................19 Hamilton County Overview ........................................................................................................................................................21 Saratoga County Overview ........................................................................................................................................................23 Warren County Overview ...........................................................................................................................................................25 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY RISKS IDENTIFIED ..............................................................................................................................27 City of Gloversville – Fulton County ...........................................................................................................................................28 Town of Bleecker – Fulton County ..............................................................................................................................................29 Town of Broadalbin – Fulton County ..........................................................................................................................................30 Village of Broadalbin – Fulton County ........................................................................................................................................31 Town of Caroga – Fulton County ................................................................................................................................................32 Town of Johnstown – Fulton County ...........................................................................................................................................33 Town of Mayfield – Fulton County ..............................................................................................................................................34 Village of Mayfield – Fulton County ...........................................................................................................................................35 Village of Northville – Fulton County ..........................................................................................................................................36 Town of Northampton – Fulton County .......................................................................................................................................37 Town of Perth – Fulton County ...................................................................................................................................................38 Town of Stratford – Fulton County .............................................................................................................................................39 Town of Arietta – Hamilton County ............................................................................................................................................41 Town of Benson – Hamilton County ...........................................................................................................................................42 Town of Hope – Hamilton County ...............................................................................................................................................43 Town of Indian Lake – Hamilton County .....................................................................................................................................44 Town of Lake Pleasant – Hamilton County .................................................................................................................................45 Town of Morehouse – Hamilton County ......................................................................................................................................46 Village of Speculator – Hamilton County ....................................................................................................................................47 REGION II DISCOVERY REPORT — SACANDAGA WATERSHED | I TABLE OF CONTENTS CONT’D Town of Wells – Hamilton County ...............................................................................................................................................48 Town of Corinth – Saratoga County ...........................................................................................................................................49 Town of Day – Saratoga County .................................................................................................................................................50 Town of Edinburg – Saratoga County .........................................................................................................................................51 Town of Galway – Saratoga County ............................................................................................................................................52 Town of Greenfield – Saratoga County .......................................................................................................................................53 Town of Hadley – Saratoga County ............................................................................................................................................54 Town of Providence – Saratoga County ......................................................................................................................................55 Town of Johnsburg – Warren County ..........................................................................................................................................56 Town of Stony Creek – Warren County .......................................................................................................................................58 Town of Thurman – Warren County ............................................................................................................................................60 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE RISK MAP PROJECT SCOPE ......................................................................................................62 Detailed Study Requests ..........................................................................................................................................................63 Approximate Study Requests ....................................................................................................................................................65 Total Watershed Study Requests Summary ...............................................................................................................................69
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mohawk River Watershed – HUC-12
    ID Number Name of Mohawk Watershed 1 Switz Kill 2 Flat Creek 3 Headwaters West Creek 4 Kayaderosseras Creek 5 Little Schoharie Creek 6 Headwaters Mohawk River 7 Headwaters Cayadutta Creek 8 Lansing Kill 9 North Creek 10 Little West Kill 11 Irish Creek 12 Auries Creek 13 Panther Creek 14 Hinckley Reservoir 15 Nowadaga Creek 16 Wheelers Creek 17 Middle Canajoharie Creek 18 Honnedaga 19 Roberts Creek 20 Headwaters Otsquago Creek 21 Mill Creek 22 Lewis Creek 23 Upper East Canada Creek 24 Shakers Creek 25 King Creek 26 Crane Creek 27 South Chuctanunda Creek 28 Middle Sprite Creek 29 Crum Creek 30 Upper Canajoharie Creek 31 Manor Kill 32 Vly Brook 33 West Kill 34 Headwaters Batavia Kill 35 Headwaters Flat Creek 36 Sterling Creek 37 Lower Ninemile Creek 38 Moyer Creek 39 Sixmile Creek 40 Cincinnati Creek 41 Reall Creek 42 Fourmile Brook 43 Poentic Kill 44 Wilsey Creek 45 Lower East Canada Creek 46 Middle Ninemile Creek 47 Gooseberry Creek 48 Mother Creek 49 Mud Creek 50 North Chuctanunda Creek 51 Wharton Hollow Creek 52 Wells Creek 53 Sandsea Kill 54 Middle East Canada Creek 55 Beaver Brook 56 Ferguson Creek 57 West Creek 58 Fort Plain 59 Ox Kill 60 Huntersfield Creek 61 Platter Kill 62 Headwaters Oriskany Creek 63 West Kill 64 Headwaters South Branch West Canada Creek 65 Fly Creek 66 Headwaters Alplaus Kill 67 Punch Kill 68 Schenevus Creek 69 Deans Creek 70 Evas Kill 71 Cripplebush Creek 72 Zimmerman Creek 73 Big Brook 74 North Creek 75 Upper Ninemile Creek 76 Yatesville Creek 77 Concklin Brook 78 Peck Lake-Caroga Creek 79 Metcalf Brook 80 Indian
    [Show full text]
  • New York Freshwater Fishing Regulations Guide: 2015-16
    NEW YORK Freshwater FISHING2015–16 OFFICIAL REGULATIONS GUIDE VOLUME 7, ISSUE NO. 1, APRIL 2015 Fishing for Muskie www.dec.ny.gov Most regulations are in effect April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR New York: A State of Angling Opportunity When it comes to freshwater fishing, no state in the nation can compare to New York. Our Great Lakes consistently deliver outstanding fishing for salmon and steelhead and it doesn’t stop there. In fact, New York is home to four of the Bassmaster’s top 50 bass lakes, drawing anglers from around the globe to come and experience great smallmouth and largemouth bass fishing. The crystal clear lakes and streams of the Adirondack and Catskill parks make New York home to the very best fly fishing east of the Rockies. Add abundant walleye, panfish, trout and trophy muskellunge and northern pike to the mix, and New York is clearly a state of angling opportunity. Fishing is a wonderful way to reconnect with the outdoors. Here in New York, we are working hard to make the sport more accessible and affordable to all. Over the past five years, we have invested more than $6 million, renovating existing boat launches and developing new ones across the state. This is in addition to the 50 new projects begun in 2014 that will make it easier for all outdoors enthusiasts to access the woods and waters of New York. Our 12 DEC fish hatcheries produce 900,000 pounds of fish each year to increase fish populations and expand and improve angling opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands of Saratoga County New York
    Acknowledgments THIS BOOKLET I S THE PRODUCT Of THE work of many individuals. Although it is based on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), tlus booklet would not have been produced without the support and cooperation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Patrick Pergola served as project coordinator for the wetlands inventory and Dan Montella was project coordinator for the preparation of this booklet. Ralph Tiner coordi­ nated the effort for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Data compiled from the NWI serve as the foun­ dation for much of this report. Information on the wetland status for this area is the result of hard work by photointerpreters, mainly Irene Huber (University of Massachusetts) with assistance from D avid Foulis and Todd Nuerminger. Glenn Smith (FWS) provided quality control of the interpreted aerial photographs and draft maps and collected field data on wetland communities. Tim Post (N.Y. State D epartment of Environmental Conservation), John Swords (FWS), James Schaberl and Chris Martin (National Park Ser­ vice) assisted in the field and the review of draft maps. Among other FWS staff contributing to this effort were Kurt Snider, Greg Pipkin, Kevin Bon, Becky Stanley, and Matt Starr. The booklet was reviewed by several people including Kathleen Drake (EPA), G eorge H odgson (Saratoga County Environmental Management Council), John Hamilton (Soil and W ater Conserva­ tion District), Dan Spada (Adirondack Park Agency), Pat Riexinger (N.Y. State Department of Environ­ mental Conservation), Susan Essig (FWS), and Jen­ nifer Brady-Connor (Association of State Wetland Nlanagers).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT New York State Assembly Carl E. Heastie Speaker Committee on Environmental Conservation Steve Englebright Chairman THE ASSEMBLY CHAIRMAN STATE OF NEW YORK Committee on Environmental Conservation COMMITTEES ALBANY Education Energy Higher Education Rules COMMISSIONS STEVEN ENGLEBRIGHT 4th Assembly District Science and Technology Suffolk County Water Resource Needs of Long Island MEMBER Bi-State L.I. Sound Marine Resource Committee N.Y.S. Heritage Area Advisory Council December 15, 2017 Honorable Carl E. Heastie Speaker of the Assembly Legislative Office Building, Room 932 Albany, NY 12248 Dear Speaker Heastie: I am pleased to submit to you the 2017 Annual Report of the Assembly Standing Committee on Environmental Conservation. This report describes the legislative actions and major issues considered by the Committee and sets forth our goals for future legislative sessions. The Committee addressed several important issues this year including record funding for drinking water and wastewater infrastructure, increased drinking water testing and remediation requirements and legislation to address climate change. In addition, the Committee held hearings to examine water quality and the State’s clean energy standard. Under your leadership and with your continued support of the Committee's efforts, the Assembly will continue the work of preserving and protecting New York's environmental resources during the 2018 legislative session. Sincerely, Steve Englebright, Chairman Assembly Standing Committee on Environmental Conservation DISTRICT OFFICE: 149 Main Street, East Setauket, New York 11733 • 631-751-3094 ALBANY OFFICE: Room 621, Legislative Office Building, Albany, New York 12248 • 518-455-4804 Email: [email protected] 2017 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Steve Englebright, Chairman Committee Members Deborah J.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishing: a Driver for Ecotourism
    New York FRESHWATER April 2019 FISHINGDigest Fishing: A Sport For Everyone NY Fishing 101 page 10 A Female's Guide to Fishing page 30 A summary of 2019–2020 regulations and useful information for New York anglers www.dec.ny.gov Message from the Governor Freshwater Fishing: A Driver for Ecotourism New York State is committed to increasing and supporting a wide array of ecotourism initiatives, including freshwater fishing. Our approach is simple—we are strengthening our commitment to protect New York State’s vast natural resources while seeking compelling ways for people to enjoy the great outdoors in a socially and environmentally responsible manner. The result is sustainable economic activity based on a sincere appreciation of our state’s natural resources and the values they provide. We invite New Yorkers and visitors alike to enjoy our high-quality water resources. New York is blessed with fisheries resources across the state. Every day, we manage and protect these fisheries with an eye to the future. To date, New York has made substantial investments in our fishing access sites to ensure that boaters and anglers have safe and well-maintained parking areas, access points, and boat launch sites. In addition, we are currently investing an additional $3.2 million in waterway access in 2019, including: • New or renovated boat launch sites on Cayuga, Oneida, and Otisco lakes • Upgrades to existing launch sites on Cranberry Lake, Delaware River, Lake Placid, Lake Champlain, Lake Ontario, Chautauqua Lake and Fourth Lake. New York continues to improve and modernize our fish hatcheries. As Governor, I have committed $17 million to hatchery improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Fishing Regulations Guide: 2017-18
    NEW YORK Freshwater FISHING 2017–18 O cial Volume 9, Issue No. 1 April 2017 Regulations Guide Fishing Lake Champlain www.dec.ny.gov Most regulations are in eect April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018 Message from the Governor New York: A State of Angling Opportunity If you are an angler, you know how lucky you are to live in New York. The Empire State is unmatched in the quality and diversity of our fish species, and ranks fifth in the nation for total acreage of freshwater fishing locations. There are so many opportunities to get out and enjoy this important sport, and I have made it a priority to ensure that all New Yorkers have access to the State’s abundant fishing resources. That is why the NY is Open for Fishing and Hunting initiative has provided more than $4 million over the last three years to rehabilitate existing boat launches and construct new launches across the state. In addition, New York continues to make great progress toward our goal of establishing 50 new or improved land and water access sites. In 2016, we opened new universally accessible fishing piers and hand carry launches on the Esopus Creek in Ulster County and Looking Glass Pond in Schoharie County. We refurbished the Dunkirk Harbor Fishing Pier in Chautauqua County, which now provides access for users of all abilities to the outstanding fishing found in this area of Lake Erie. 2017 will see the opening of a brand new boat launch on Meacham Lake in Franklin County and updated facility on the northern end of Cayuga Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Department of State
    November 25, 2020 DEPARTMENT OF STATE Vol. XLII Division of Administrative Rules Issue 47 NEW YORK STATE REGISTER INSIDE THIS ISSUE: D Inland Trout Stream Fishing Regulations D Minimum Standards for Form, Content, and Sale of Health Insurance, Including Standards of Full and Fair Disclosure D Surge and Flex Health Coordination System Availability of State and Federal Funds Executive Orders Financial Reports State agencies must specify in each notice which proposes a rule the last date on which they will accept public comment. Agencies must always accept public comment: for a minimum of 60 days following publication in the Register of a Notice of Proposed Rule Making, or a Notice of Emergency Adoption and Proposed Rule Making; and for 45 days after publication of a Notice of Revised Rule Making, or a Notice of Emergency Adoption and Revised Rule Making in the Register. When a public hearing is required by statute, the hearing cannot be held until 60 days after publication of the notice, and comments must be accepted for at least 5 days after the last required hearing. When the public comment period ends on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, agencies must accept comment through the close of business on the next succeeding workday. For notices published in this issue: – the 60-day period expires on January 24, 2021 – the 45-day period expires on January 9, 2021 – the 30-day period expires on December 5, 2020 ANDREW M. CUOMO GOVERNOR ROSSANA ROSADO SECRETARY OF STATE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE For press and media inquiries call: (518) 474-0050 For State Register production, scheduling and subscription information call: (518) 474-6957 E-mail: [email protected] For legal assistance with State Register filing requirements call: (518) 474-6740 E-mail: [email protected] The New York State Register is now available on-line at: www.dos.ny.gov/info/register.htm The New York State Register (ISSN 0197 2472) is published weekly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lasting Impacts of Large-Volume Runoff Events: Evaluating River
    The Lasting Impacts of Large-Volume Runoff Events: Evaluating River Discharge and Suspended Sediment Transfer Patterns Following Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee, Schoharie Watershed, New York State, USA By Jesse Van Patter A Thesis Presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geography Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Jesse Van Patter, May, 2017 ABSTRACT The Lasting Impacts of Large-Volume Runoff Events: Evaluating River Discharge and Suspended Sediment Transfer Patterns Following Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee, Schoharie Watershed, New York State, USA Jesse Van Patter Advisor: University of Guelph, 2017 Dr. Jaclyn Cockburn Committee Member: Dr. Wanhong Yang Large-volume runoff events have lasting impacts on sediment transfer by providing long-term supplies of transferable sediment. Hurricane Irene and Tropical Storm Lee generated extreme runoff throughout the Northeastern United States. This research evaluated multi-year discharge and suspended sediment transfer patterns for Schoharie Creek, New York State, USA to investigate the lasting impacts associated with extreme (>500-year recurrence interval) runoff generated by Irene and Lee. The relationship for river discharge and suspended sediment transfer was evaluated for 69 runoff events in 2013-2015; results indicated that sediment supply depletion did not occur. The multi-decadal suspended sediment flux was estimated during 1973- 2012 to investigate long-term sediment transfer processes. The suspended sediment flux was primarily transported during high discharge periods in each water year. Annual runoff and the frequency for large-volume runoff events have increased in the Northeastern United States from the mid-20th century to the present, thus suspended sediment transfer has likely increased.
    [Show full text]
  • VILLAGE of NORTHVILLE DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Village Board Review Rev 1
    2017 VILLAGE OF NORTHVILLE DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Village Board Review Rev 1 ADOPTED: RESOLUTION: ~ 0 ~ VISION STATEMENT In 2035, as you cross the bridge into Northville you will find the Village to be an age diverse yet community minded population living in a quaint and historical atmosphere having a relaxed lifestyle complimented by a strong commercial tax base. The Village's commercial core area will provide residents and visitors with a wide variety of essential goods and services such as grocery, convenience and hardware stores, pharmacy and a bank. The commercial core will 4also be home to a mix of residential uses located above existing commercial buildings providing for an increase in population density to support the commercial establishments. Excellent emergency services to include ambulance, fire and police will continue to serve and be supported by the local population. A healthcare facility will continue to operate within the Village and continue to provide general healthcare services using the latest technologies. Among these essential service establishments, you will find just as many unique family owned and operated businesses such as restaurants, a recreational outfitter, outdoor sporting goods establishment and specialty foods. The Village will feature a low property tax rate and a government that is proactive, ready to assist and support, financially and by other means initiatives important to its citizens. Housing choices will be available for both senior citizens, millennials and young families alike. The Village shall continue to support and be served by a strong school system educating students for both college and the 21st Century workforce through increased educational technologies and disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Ddt, Chlordane, and Total Pcb's in Bed Sediments in the Hudson River Basin
    NYES&E, Vol. 3, No. 1, Spring 1997 DISTRIBUTION OF DDT, CHLORDANE, AND TOTAL PCB'S IN BED SEDIMENTS IN THE HUDSON RIVER BASIN Patrick J. Phillips1, Karen Riva-Murray1, Hannah M. Hollister2, and Elizabeth A. Flanary1. 1U.S. Geological Survey, 425 Jordan Road, Troy NY 12180. 2Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Troy NY 12180. Abstract Data from streambed-sediment samples collected from 45 sites in the Hudson River Basin and analyzed for organochlorine compounds indicate that residues of DDT, chlordane, and PCB's can be detected even though use of these compounds has been banned for 10 or more years. Previous studies indicate that DDT and chlordane were widely used in a variety of land use settings in the basin, whereas PCB's were introduced into Hudson and Mohawk Rivers mostly as point discharges at a few locations. Detection limits for DDT and chlordane residues in this study were generally 1 µg/kg, and that for total PCB's was 50 µg/kg. Some form of DDT was detected in more than 60 percent of the samples, and some form of chlordane was found in about 30 percent; PCB's were found in about 33 percent of the samples. Median concentrations for p,p’- DDE (the DDT residue with the highest concentration) were highest in samples from sites representing urban areas (median concentration 5.3 µg/kg) and lower in samples from sites in large watersheds (1.25 µg/kg) and at sites in nonurban watersheds. (Urban watershed were defined as those with a population density of more than 60/km2; nonurban watersheds as those with a population density of less than 60/km2, and large watersheds as those encompassing more than 1,300 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Species of the Adirondack Region
    Invasive Species of the Adirondack Region Meghan Johnstone Aquatic Invasive Species Project Coordinator Adirondack Park Invasive Plant Program [email protected] (518)576-2082 x119 www.adkinvasives.com Presentation Outline • What are invasive species? • What is the Adirondack Park Invasive Plant Program? • What are the priority aquatic invasive species in the Adirondacks? • Black River Watershed • Which spread prevention tips should you use or recommend? Lythrum salicaria What’s the difference? Native Species • Species indigenous to a region at the time of European settlement Non-native Species (Exotic, Introduced, Alien) • Accidental or purposeful introduction of a species outside of its historic range Invasive Species (Noxious) • Non-native species that rapidly reproduces and displaces native species causing harm Nuisance Species (Weed) • Species that interferes with human activities Our Focus Species that… • Are not native to the ecosystem under consideration. • Can reproduce and support self-sustaining populations. • Can “jump” spatial gaps. • Cause ecological, economic, or societal harms. Benefits of Native Plants • Provide food • Stabilize sediments • Provide shelter and • Reduce turbidity spawning habitat • Produce oxygen • Transport nutrients • Protect shoreline • Support diversity The Horror Stories: What Can Happen If Invasives Are Allowed To Spread Eurasian watermilfoil, Eagle Lake Water chestnut, Lake Champlain Common reed grass, Long Lake Japanese knotweed, Saranac Lake Swallow-wort spp., St. Lawrence Why are some non-natives
    [Show full text]
  • May-July 2008 No
    MAY-JULY 2008 No. 0803 chepontuc — “Hard place to cross”, Iroquois reference to Glens Falls hepontuc ootnotes C T H E N E W S L E tt E R O F T H E G L E N S F ALLS- S ARAFT O G A C H A P T E R O F T H E A DIRO N DA C K M O U nt AI N C L U B Hikers alerted to muddy trails By Jim Schneider promote safety, hikers are advised to use Debar Mountain Wild Forest — trails only at lower elevations during the Azure Mountain New York State Department of spring mud season. Lower trails usually Giant Mountain Wilderness — Giant’s Environmental Conservation (DEC) urges are dry soon after snowmelt and are on less Washbowl and Roaring Brook Falls hikers of the Adirondack High Peaks to be erosive soils than the higher peaks. DEC is High Peaks Wilderness — Ampersand cautious during trips into the area and to asking hikers to avoid the following trails Mountain; Cascade; Big Slide; Brothers, postpone hiking on trails above 3,000 feet until muddy conditions have subsided: and Porter from Cascade; avoid all other until otherwise advised. High Peaks Wilderness Area — all trails approaches During warm and wet spring weather, above 3,000 feet—wet, muddy snow con- Hurricane Primitive Area — The many trails in higher and steeper por- ditions prevail, specifically at: Algonquin; Crows and Hurricane Mountain from tions of the Adirondacks can be become Colden; Feldspar; Gothics; Indian Pass; Route 9N hazardous to hikers. In the current muddy Lake Arnold Cross-Over; Marcy; Marcy McKenzie Mt.
    [Show full text]