Aphodiinae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), Fauna of New

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aphodiinae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), Fauna of New INVERTEBRATE SYSTEMATICS ADVISORY GROUP REPRESENTATIVES OF LANDCARE RESEARCH Dr D.R. Penman Landcare Research Lincoln Agriculture & Science Centre P.O. Box 69, Lincoln, New Zealand Dr T.K. Crosby and Dr M.-C. Larivière Landcare Research Mount Albert Research Centre Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF UNIVERSITIES Dr R.M. Emberson Ecology and Entomology Group Soil, Plant, and Ecological Sciences Division P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF MUSEUMS Mr R.L. Palma Natural Environment Department Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF OVERSEAS INSTITUTIONS Dr J.F. Lawrence CSIRO Division of Entomology G.P.O. Box 1700, Canberra City A.C.T. 2601, Australia * * * SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby Landcare Research Mount Albert Research Centre Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 42 Aphodiinae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Z. T. Stebnicka Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow 31–016, Poland [email protected] Manaaki W h e n u a P R E S S Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2001 Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2001 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher. Cataloguing in publication STEBNICKA, Z. T. (Zdzis»awaTeresa), 1932– Aphodiinae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) / Z. T. Stebnicka – Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, 2001. (Fauna of New Zealand, ISSN 0111–5383 ; no. 42). ISBN 0-478-09341-1 I. Title II. Series UDC 595.764.1(931) Prepared for publication by the series editor using computer-based text processing, layout, scanning, and printing at Landcare Research, Mt Albert Research Centre, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand M~ori text by H. Jacob, Huatau Consultants, Levin. Published by Manaaki Whenua Press, Landcare Research, P.O. Box 40, Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z. Website: http://www.mwpress.co.nz/ Printed by PrintLink Ltd, Wellington Front cover: Acrossidius tasmaniae (Hope) (Illustrator: D. W. Helmore). Publication of the Fauna of New Zealand series is the result of a research investment by the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology under contract number C09X002. Fauna of New Zealand 42 5 POPULAR SUMMARY HE WHAKARAPOPOTOTANGA Class Insecta Order Coleoptera Family Scarabaeidae Subfamily Aphodiinae Illustration / Whakaahua: Phycocus graniceps Broun (Il- lustrator / Kaiwhakaahua: A. C. Harris). Dung beetles Ng~ p§tara tãtae Representatives of the Aphodiinae are found throughout Kitea ai ng~ mea o te wh~nau iti Aphodiinae i ng~ koko the world but it is generally assumed that the warm part katoa o te ao, heoi ko te whakapae, ko ng~ w~hi mahana of the Old World is their centre of distribution. The New o te ‘Ao Tawhito’ tÇ r~tou tino k~inga. O ng~ iwi me ng~ World and Australia, on the other hand, possess only very puninga ka kitea i reira, he ruarua noa iho ka kitea anÇ i few members of those tribes and genera that occur in the te ‘Ao Hou’ me Ahitereiria. Heoi, ko te nuinga o ng~ Old World — instead, endemic genera and species of other puninga me ng~ iwi ka kitea i ‘nei takiw~, k~ore e kitea i tribes of Aphodiinae are numerous. w~hi k‘. Approximately 3100 species of aphodiines are known, Kei te ~hua 3100 ng~ momo aphodiine e mÇhiotia and many more may be expected, especially from the ana, otir~, ar~ noa atu pea ng~ momo k~ore anÇ i ~ta Neotropical and Oriental regions. The beetles are vari- tautuhia. E tino h~ngai ana t‘nei whakapae ki ng~ takiw~ ously shaped and sculptured, and range from 0.8 mm to o te Pã o Amerika me Amerika ki te Tonga, tae atu ki 16.0 mm in length. They are most commonly called “dung }hia. He rerek‘ te hanga o t‘n~, o t‘n~, ~, ko te rahi, kei beetles”, though in fact only a part of this subfamily is waenga i te 0.8 mm me te 16.0 mm. Ko te ‘p§tara tãtae’ usually collected in dung. Aphodiinae are coprophagous tÇ r~tou ingoa k~rangaranga, engari ko t‘tahi w~hanga or saprophagous, feeding and breeding in the soil on vari- noa iho o t‘nei wh~nau iti ka kitea e noho ana i te tãtae. ous kinds of excrement and/or in vegetable debris. Sev- He kai tãtae, he kai popo ng~ aphodiinae, ~, ka kitea e eral species found in Europe, Asia, America, and Austra- kai ana, e whakaputa uri ana i roto i ‘nei mea i te oneone. lia, and two species (Acrossidius tasmaniae (Hope) and Kua rangahaua ng~ momo maha tonu e noho ana i âropi, Ataenius picinus Harold) in New Zealand have been stud- i }hia, i Amerika, me Ahitereiria, me ‘tahi momo e rua o ied as minor pests of cultivated plants. Some species, e.g., Aotearoa (ko te Acrossidius tasmaniae (Hope) me te Phycocus graniceps Broun and Tesarius sulcipennis (Lea), Ataenius picinus Harold), he kaikai m~ra nÇ r~tou. Ar~ are strongly associated with coastal sand dunes. Many anÇ ‘tahi momo p‘r~ i a Phycocus graniceps Broun me te species in other countries are associated with ants and Tesarius sulcipennis (Lea) e kitea nuitia ana ki ng~ t~huna termites and some others live in the burrows of small o te tahamoana. He maha ng~ momo i t~w~hi e noho ana mammals. A few species are known to be kleptoparasitic, i waenga i a ng~i pÇpokorua me ng~i pÇpokotea, ko ‘tahi breeding in the brood balls of nest-building dung beetles anÇ e noho ana ki ng~ rua o ‘tahi kararehe wh~ngote (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Adults of Aphodiinae are moroiti. Ko ‘tahi momo ruarua nei, ka wh~nako i ng~ attracted to light and are often found in various kinds of kÇhanga o ng~ p§tara tãtae hanga kÇhanga (ar~ ng~ excrement, in decaying vegetation, under logs and moss, Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae), hei w~hi whakaputa uri mÇ in rotten wood, and under loose bark of dead trees. The r~tou. Whaiwhai ai ng~ aphodiinae pakeke i te m~rama. immatures are known for a relatively small number of Ka kitea nuitia hoki i ng~ momo tãtae maha, i ng~ popo, species. (continued overleaf) (haere tonu) 6 Stebnicka (2001): Aphodiinae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Twenty species of Aphodiinae are now known from i raro i ng~ poro r~kau me ng~ pãkohu, i ng~ r~kau pirau, New Zealand. Eleven of these have been introduced, prob- i raro r~nei i te hiako o ng~ r~kau kua mate noa. E mÇhiotia ably through human commerce — six are from Australia, ana te hanga kÇhungahunga o ‘tahi momo ~hua ruarua two from America, one from Africa, and the last two are nei. cosmopolitan species of European derivation. E rua tekau ng~ momo Aphodiinae o Aotearoa e The remaining nine species of the genera Phycocus mÇhiotia ana in~ianei. Tekau m~ tahi o ‘nei, kua rere mai Broun (introduced to Tasmania) and Saprosites i t~w~hi, n~ ng~ mahi tauhokohoko pea i heri mai. E ono Redtenbacher are indigenous to New Zealand. One spe- i tau mai i Ahitereiria, e rua mai i Amerika, kotahi mai i cies is found only on the South Island, and seven are found }wherika, e rua atu anÇ nÇ âropi taketake ake, engari only on the North Island including one species collected kua puta atu ki ng~ hau e wh~. also on the Kermadec Islands, and one on the Chathams T‘r~ anÇ ng~ momo e iwa o te puninga Phycocus Islands. One species is indigenous to the Three Kings Broun (kua tae atu anÇ ki Tahim~nia) me Saprosites Islands, one to the Chatham Islands, and one to the Redtenbacher, he momo tãturu nÇ Aotearoa. Kotahi te Kermadec Islands (introduced to the North Island). The momo ka kitea i Te Waipounamu anake, e rima ka kitea i non-endemic species, of adventive origin are frequently Te Ika a M~ui anake, kotahi ka kitea i Te Ika a M~ui me abundant and conspicuous in towns, orchards, pastures, ng~ moutere Kermadec, kotahi anÇ i Te Ika a M~ui me and other modified environments. The faunal relation- R‘kohu. Kotahi te momo nÇ Manawa-t~whi tãturu, kotahi ships of the native New Zealand Aphodiinae are clearly nÇ R‘kohu tãturu, kotahi nÇ ng~ Kermadec tãturu (kua closest to those of Australia. tau mai anÇ ki Te Ika a M~ui). Ko ng~ momo ehara nÇ konei taketake ake, engari kei konei e noho ana, ka kitea nuitia i ng~ taone, i ng~ m~ra huar~kau, i ng~ p~t§t§, me ‘r~ atu taiao n~ te ringa tangata i raweke. Ko ng~ hono i waenga i ng~ Aphodiinae o Aotearoa taketake ake, e ~hua rite ana ki ‘r~ o Ahitereiria. I wh~nau mai te kaituhi, a Zdzis»awa Teresa Stebnicka (ko Eichler tana ingoa wh~nau), i PÇrana. Ko ng~ mahi toi me ng~ pãtaiao m~ori ~na kaupapa matua i te whare w~nanga, ~ ka whakawhiwhia ia ki tana T~kutatanga Pãtaiao i te W~nanga Pãtaiao o PÇrana, i Cracow. Kei te Pãtahi WhakarÇpã, Kunenga Kararehe, i raro i te maru o te W~nanga Pãtaiao o PÇrana, a ia e mahi ana. Ko t~na kaupapa rangahau, ko te whakarÇpã, te whakatairite hanga rauropi, te koiora-matawhenua, me te kunenga o ‘tahi rÇpã p§tara, otir~, me te aro wh~iti ki ng~ tini Aphodiinae, huri i te ao.
Recommended publications
  • Dung Beetle Assemblages Attracted to Cow and Horse Dung: the Importance of Mouthpart Traits, Body Size, and Nesting Behavior in the Community Assembly Process
    life Article Dung Beetle Assemblages Attracted to Cow and Horse Dung: The Importance of Mouthpart Traits, Body Size, and Nesting Behavior in the Community Assembly Process Mattia Tonelli 1,2,* , Victoria C. Giménez Gómez 3, José R. Verdú 2, Fernando Casanoves 4 and Mario Zunino 5 1 Department of Pure and Applied Science (DiSPeA), University of Urbino “Carlo Bo”, 61029 Urbino, Italy 2 I.U.I CIBIO (Centro Iberoamericano de la Biodiversidad), Universidad de Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, 03690 Alicante, Spain; [email protected] 3 Instituto de Biología Subtropical, Universidad Nacional de Misiones–CONICET, 3370 Puerto Iguazú, Argentina; [email protected] 4 CATIE, Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, 30501 Turrialba, Costa Rica; [email protected] 5 Asti Academic Centre for Advanced Studies, School of Biodiversity, 14100 Asti, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Dung beetles use excrement for feeding and reproductive purposes. Although they use a range of dung types, there have been several reports of dung beetles showing a preference for certain feces. However, exactly what determines dung preference in dung beetles remains controversial. In the present study, we investigated differences in dung beetle communities attracted to horse or cow dung from a functional diversity standpoint. Specifically, by examining 18 functional traits, Citation: Tonelli, M.; Giménez we sought to understand if the dung beetle assembly process is mediated by particular traits in Gómez, V.C.; Verdú, J.R.; Casanoves, different dung types. Species specific dung preferences were recorded for eight species, two of which F.; Zunino, M. Dung Beetle Assemblages Attracted to Cow and prefer horse dung and six of which prefer cow dung.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    Daugavpils University Institute of Systematic Biology 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “RESEARCH AND CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN BALTIC REGION” Daugavpils, 22 – 24 April, 2009 BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Daugavpils University Academic Press “Saule” Daugavpils 2009 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “RESEARCH AND CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN BALTIC REGION” , Book of Abstracts, Daugavpils, 22 – 24 April, 2009 INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE: Dr., Prof. Arvīds Barševskis, Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia – chairman of the Conference; Dr., Assoc. prof. Inese Kokina, Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia – vice-chairman of the Conference Dr., Assoc prof.. Linas Balčiauskas, Institute of Ecology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania; Dr., Assoc prof. Guntis Brumelis, Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia; Dr. Ivars Druvietis, Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia; Dr. Pēteris Evarts – Bunders, Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia; Dr. Dace Grauda , University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia; PhD Stanislaw Huruk, Świętokrzyska Academy & Świętokrzyski National Park, Kielce, Poland; Dr. Muza Kirjušina, Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia; Dr. hab., Prof. Māris Kļaviņš, Faculty of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia, full member of Latvian Academy of Science, Rīga, Latvia; PhD Tatjana Krama - Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia; Dr. Indriķis Krams - Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia; Dr. habil., Prof. Māris Laiviņš, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia; Dr. hab., Prof. Sławomir Mazur, Warsaw Agricultural University (SGGW), Warsaw, Poland; Dr., Prof. Algimantas Paulauskas, Vytautas Magnus Kaunas University, Kaunas, Lithuania; Dr. Lyubomir Penev, Pensoft, Bulgaria; Dr. hab., Prof. Isaak Rashal, University of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia; Dr. hab., Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Remains from Various Sites in Southwark: Draft for Consultation
    Insect remains from various sites in Southwark: Draft for consultation H. K. Kenward Environmental Archaeology Unit, University of York, York YO1 5DD. [NB: This report was reformatted from a Runoff file on 18th March 2008. The only changes have been to preserve internal consistency and to correct typographical errors. HK. The original was an archive report deposited in the former Environmental Archaeology Unit, York, and the Ancient Monuments Laboratory, and allocated post hoc as Reports from the Environmental Archaeology Unit, York 90/10.] Introduction This report is an account of insect remains from a large number of samples from several sites in Southwark. The material was provided in processed form. The majority of the assemblages were dry in plastic tubes, and the remainder in IMS in glass vials. In some cases, material in both forms was available for a sample. Almost all the groups of insects were, by comparison with the material normally used for interpretation, very small, often only one to a few fragments. In a few cases some twenty or so individuals of beetles and bugs were represented by the remains; the largest group was perhaps twice this size, still less than half the number of individuals generally taken as a reasonable working minimum for interpretation of a mixed assemblage (Kenward 1978). The dry material appeared to be biassed in favour of large taxa, and presented considerable difficulty in handling because of the effect of static attraction between fossils and the plastic vials. Many fossils were damaged while attempting to remove them, and others sprang away as a result of static repulsion as soon as they were taken from the tubes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Phylogenetic Hypotheses Regarding Aphodiinae (Coleoptera; Scarabaeidae)
    STATE OF KNOWLEDGE OF DUNG BEETLE PHYLOGENY - a review of phylogenetic hypotheses regarding Aphodiinae (Coleoptera; Scarabaeidae) Mattias Forshage 2002 Examensarbete i biologi 20 p, Ht 2002 Department of Systematic Zoology, Evolutionary Biology Center, Uppsala University Supervisor Fredrik Ronquist Abstract: As a preparation for proper phylogenetic analysis of groups within the coprophagous clade of Scarabaeidae, an overview is presented of all the proposed suprageneric taxa in Aphodiinae. The current knowledge of the affiliations of each group is discussed based on available information on their morphology, biology, biogeography and paleontology, as well as their classification history. With this as a background an attempt is made to estimate the validity of each taxon from a cladistic perspective, suggest possibilities and point out the most important questions for further research in clarifying the phylogeny of the group. The introductory part A) is not a scientific paper but an introduction into the subject intended for the seminar along with a polemic against a fraction of the presently most active workers in the field: Dellacasa, Bordat and Dellacasa. The main part B) is the discussion of all proposed suprageneric taxa in the subfamily from a cladistic viewpoint. The current classification is found to be quite messy and unfortunately a large part of the many recent attempts to revise higher-level classification within the group do not seem to be improvements from a phylogenetic viewpoint. Most recently proposed tribes (as well as
    [Show full text]
  • Larvae of Ataenius (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae
    Eur. J. Entomol. 96: 57—68, 1999 ISSN 1210-5759 Larvae ofAtaenius (Coleóptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae): Generic characteristics and species descriptions José R. VERDÚ and E duardo GALANTE Departamento de Ciencias Ambientales y Recursos Naturales, Universidad de Alicante, E-03080 Alicante, Spain Key words.Scarabaeidae, Aphodiinae, Ataenius, larvae, description, key, dung beetles, turfgrass beetles, taxonomy Abstract. We compared the larval morphology of the genera Ataenius and Aphodius. The third larval instars of five Ataenius species: Ataenius opatrinus Harold, A. picinus Harold, A. platensis (Blanchard), A. simulator Harold and A. strigicauda Bates, are described or redescribed and illustrated. The most important morphological characteristics of the larvae of Ataenius are found in the respiratory plate of thoracic spiracle, the setation of venter of the last abdominal segment, the setation of the epicranial region and the morphology of the epipharynx. A key to larvae of the known species of Ataenius is included. INTRODUCTION del Sacramento (Uruguay). For the purpose of laboratory studies, a total of 10 to 20 adult specimens of each species were The genus Ataenius Harold comprises 320 species, of kept in cylindrical plastic breeding cages (20 cm high, 10 cm which 228 species are found in America, 49 in Australia, wide) with moist soil and dry cow dung from which they had 11 in Africa, 6 in East Asia, 2 in Madagascar, and single been collected. The lid was an opening (6 cm diameter) covered species in India, Sri Lanka, Turkestan, Japan, Hawaii and with gauze screen. These breeding cages were maintained in an Sumatra, respectively (Dellacasa, 1987). Despite the rich­ environmental chamber at 25 : 20°C (L : D), 80 ± 5% RH, with ness of this genus and its worldwide distribution, the lar­ a photoperiod of 15 : 9 (L : D).
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance Of
    HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY Influence of Plant Parameters on Occurrence and Abundance of Arthropods in Residential Turfgrass 1 S. V. JOSEPH AND S. K. BRAMAN Department of Entomology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, GrifÞn, GA 30223-1797 J. Econ. Entomol. 102(3): 1116Ð1122 (2009) ABSTRACT The effect of taxa [common Bermuda grass, Cynodon dactylon (L.); centipedegrass, Eremochloa ophiuroides Munro Hack; St. Augustinegrass, Stenotaphrum secundatum [Walt.] Kuntze; and zoysiagrass, Zoysia spp.], density, height, and weed density on abundance of natural enemies, and their potential prey were evaluated in residential turf. Total predatory Heteroptera were most abundant in St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass and included Anthocoridae, Lasiochilidae, Geocoridae, and Miridae. Anthocoridae and Lasiochilidae were most common in St. Augustinegrass, and their abundance correlated positively with species of Blissidae and Delphacidae. Chinch bugs were present in all turf taxa, but were 23Ð47 times more abundant in St. Augustinegrass. Anthocorids/lasiochilids were more numerous on taller grasses, as were Blissidae, Delphacidae, Cicadellidae, and Cercopidae. Geocoridae and Miridae were most common in zoysiagrass and were collected in higher numbers with increasing weed density. However, no predatory Heteroptera were affected by grass density. Other beneÞcial insects such as staphylinids and parasitic Hymenoptera were captured most often in St. Augustinegrass and zoysiagrass. These differences in abundance could be in response to primary or alternate prey, or reßect the inßuence of turf microenvironmental characteristics. In this study, SimpsonÕs diversity index for predatory Heteroptera showed the greatest diversity and evenness in centipedegrass, whereas the herbivores and detritivores were most diverse in St. Augustinegrass lawns. These results demonstrate the complex role of plant taxa in structuring arthropod communities in turf.
    [Show full text]
  • Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae) of the Mpala Research Centre and Environs, Laikipia District, Kenya
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 2008 Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae) of the Mpala Research Centre and environs, Laikipia District, Kenya Robert D. Gordon Northern Plains Entomology Patrice Bordat Lagasse, F-82300 Saint-Cirq, France Giovanni Dellacasa Genova, Italy Marco Dellacasa Università di Pisa, via Roma Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Gordon, Robert D.; Bordat, Patrice; Dellacasa, Giovanni; and Dellacasa, Marco, "Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae) of the Mpala Research Centre and environs, Laikipia District, Kenya" (2008). Insecta Mundi. 119. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/119 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0028 Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae) of the Mpala Research Centre and environs, Laikipia District, Kenya Robert D. Gordon Northern Plains Entomology P. O. Box, 65 Willow City, ND 58384 USA Patrice Bordat Lagasse, F-82300 Saint-Cirq, France Giovanni Dellacasa C.P. 921, I-1612 Genova, Italy Marco Dellacasa Centro Interdipartimentale, Museo di Storia Naturalle e del Territorio Università di Pisa, via Roma 79, I-56011 Calci (Pisa) Italy Date of Issue: March 3, 2008 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL Robert D. Gordon, Patrice Bordat, Giovanni Dellacasa, Marco Dellacasa Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Aphodiinae) of the Mpala Research Centre and environs, Laikipia District, Kenya Insecta Mundi 0028: 1-15 Published in 2008 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Quick Guide for the Identification Of
    Quick Guide for the Identification of Maryland Scarabaeoidea Mallory Hagadorn Dr. Dana L. Price Department of Biological Sciences Salisbury University This document is a pictorial reference of Maryland Scarabaeoidea genera (and sometimes species) that was created to expedite the identification of Maryland Scarabs. Our current understanding of Maryland Scarabs comes from “An Annotated Checklist of the Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) of Maryland” (Staines 1984). Staines reported 266 species and subspecies using literature and review of several Maryland Museums. Dr. Price and her research students are currently conducting a bioinventory of Maryland Scarabs that will be used to create a “Taxonomic Guide to the Scarabaeoidea of Maryland”. This will include dichotomous keys to family and species based on historical reports and collections from all 23 counties in Maryland. This document should be cited as: Hagadorn, M.A. and D.L. Price. 2012. Quick Guide for the Identification of Maryland Scarabaeoidea. Salisbury University. Pp. 54. Questions regarding this document should be sent to: Dr. Dana L. Price - [email protected] **All pictures within are linked to their copyright holder. Table of Contents Families of Scarabaeoidea of Maryland……………………………………... 6 Geotrupidae……………………………………………………………………. 7 Subfamily Bolboceratinae……………………………………………… 7 Genus Bolbocerosoma………………………………………… 7 Genus Eucanthus………………………………………………. 7 Subfamily Geotrupinae………………………………………………… 8 Genus Geotrupes………………………………………………. 8 Genus Odonteus...……………………………………………… 9 Glaphyridae..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Vol. Completo
    Oo TÍTULO: Escarabajos, diversidad y conservación biológica. Ensayos en homenaje a Gonzalo Halffter EDITORES CIENTÍFICOS: Mario Zunino & Antonio Melic ISBN: 978-84-935872-1-5 DEPÓSITO LEGAL: Z-4011-2007 m3m : Monografías Tercer Milenio Vol. 7, S.E.A., Zaragoza Primera Edición: 30 noviembre de 2007 EDITA: S.E.A. - Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa Avda. Radio Juventud, 37; 50012 Zaragoza (España) www.sea-entomologia.org EDICIÓN TÉCNICA: Antonio Melic IMPRIME: Gorfi, S. A. Menéndez Pelayo, 4; Zaragoza (España) FORMA SUGERIDA DE CITACIÓN DE LA OBRA: Zunino, M. & A. Melic (eds.) 2007. Escarabajos, diversidad y conservación biológica. Ensayos en homenaje a Gonzalo Halffter. m3m – Monografías Tercer Milenio, vol. 7. S.E.A., Zaragoza. SOLICITUDES: S.E.A. www.sea-entomologia.org Volumen dedicado con respeto y admiración a Gonzalo Halffter en su 75 aniversario ooo 7 Escarabajos, diversidad y conservación biológica Ensayos en homenaje a Gonzalo Halffter Mario Zunino & Antonio Melic (eds.) Í n d i c e CAPÍTULO 1: 9−13 Mis primeros años de aprendizaje con Gonzalo Halffter Pedro Reyes-Castillo CAPÍTULO 2: 15−18 Fundación y génesis del Instituto de Ecología, A. C. de México Sonia Gallina Tessaro CAPÍTULO 3: 19−22 Scarabeosofía: la dialéctica de un científico entre insectos y conceptos Mario Zunino CAPÍTULO 4: 23−34 Halffter y la S.E.A. Antonio Melic CAPÍTULO 5: 35−49 Publicaciones de Gonzalo Halffter 1952-2007 Mario Zunino & Antonio Melic CAPÍTULO 6: 51−61 Halffterinetis, nuevo género mexicano de Cetoniidae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) Miguel Angel Morón CAPÍTULO 7: 63−68 Fauna de Passalidae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) en el bosque mesófilo de montaña del sureste de Chiapas, México Eduardo R.
    [Show full text]
  • JBES-Vol9no2-P122-12
    J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2016 Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences (JBES) ISSN: 2220-6663 (Print) 2222-3045 (Online) Vol. 9, No. 2, p. 122-128, 2016 http://www.innspub.net RESEARCH PAPER OPEN ACCESS New faunal records of dung beetles from district Sialkot, Punjab, Pakistan Ayesha Nasir2, Mubashar Hussain*1, Samman Fatima2, Nadia Noureen1, Mobeen Ghazanfar2 1Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan 2Research Scholar, Faculty of Science, University of Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan Article published on August 31, 2016 Key words: Dung beetles, Faunal records, Pakistan Abstract The study was carried out to explore the dung beetle fauna from district Sialkot, Punjab, Pakistan with emphasizes on the abundance and richness of species, distribution and description from cropland and pastures. Dung beetles specimens were sampled randomly from various parts District Sialkot. The specimens were collected by hand picking within the dung pat and by digging under and near the dung pats in natural pastures and croplands during 2014 - 2015. Specimens were subjected to identification by using standard morphological keys. Total 595 specimens were recorded from the study site belonging to 2 families, 5 tribes, 9 genera, and 25 species out of which four species Tiniocellus (Tiniocellus) modestus (Roth, 1851), Aphodius (Calaphodius) Moestus (Fabricius), Aphodius (Calamosternus) granarius (Linnaeus, 1767) and Onthophagus troglodyta (Wiedemann, 1823) were amongst new records from pakistan. The study emphasized on further exploration of fauna of Scarabaeidae family in the district Sialkot with special reference to ecological parameters. *Corresponding Author: Mubashar Hussain [email protected] 122 | Nasir et al. J. Bio. & Env.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Aphodiinae), with Notes on Assumedly Termitophilic Aphodiines
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 34: 55–76A new (2010) genus and species and a revised phylogeny of Stereomerini, with notes... 55 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.34.264 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A new genus and species and a revised phylogeny of Stereomerini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Aphodiinae), with notes on assumedly termitophilic aphodiines Hege Vårdal1,†, Mattias Forshage1,2,‡ 1 Department of Entomology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden 2 Department of Systematic Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, SE- 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:C87892C8-EE6B-4520-8402-85FD0E297455 ‡ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F26F07CF-D637-4897-8EE4-D7BC805A196B Corresponding author: Hege Vårdal ([email protected]) Academic editor: Brett Ratcliff e | Received 1 September 2009 | Accepted 5 November2009 | Published 28 January 2010 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4E78321B-96D8-4C57-A3C5-79E38C713F4E Citation: Vårdal H, Forshage M (2010) A new genus and species and a revised phylogeny of Stereomerini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Aphodiinae), with notes on assumedly termitophilic aphodiines. In: Ratcliff e B, Krell F-T (Eds) Current advances in Scarabaeoidea research. ZooKeys 34: 55–76. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.34.264 Abstract A new genus and species of Stereomerini, Cheleion malayanum gen. n. and sp. n., are described based on a single specimen from the Malacca peninsula in Malaysia. It is the fi rst stereomerine found on the mainland of the Asian continent. A key to genera of Stereomerini and a phylogenetic estimate of the ster- eomerines using 24 species representing 7 tribes of Aphodiinae based on 53 morphological characters.
    [Show full text]