DOCSLIB.ORG

2009 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2009 Annual Report NAVIGATING A CHANGING AMERICA The Urban–Brookings Tax Policy Center 2009 Annual Report The Urban Institute, 2100 M Street, NW, Washington, DC 20037 The Brookings Institution, 1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20036 www.taxpolicycenter.org Letter from the Directors It would be an understatement to say that 2009 was an eventful year for the Tax Policy Center. We immersed ourselves in the major tax and fiscal policy issues that arose in the wake of a change in administration, a historic financial collapse, a deep recession, and a massive federal deficit. In this challenging environment, TPC redoubled its effort to provide policymakers, journalists, academics, and citizens with the objective, timely, and accessible analyses needed to evaluate current and emerging tax and fiscal policy issues. As President Obama took office at the beginning of the year and faced the immediate challenge of jump-starting an economy deep in recession, our work became more urgent than ever. We analyzed and evaluated stimulus proposals, wrote background papers, and issued four wave-making report cards on the major provisions of the 2009 economic stimulus plans as the bills wended through the legislative process. We graded the short- and long-term effects of the stimulus on the economy and offered insights on the impacts of the proposals on fairness and complexity. Most important, we suggested ways to make the proposals more effective. Congressional staffers consulted with us as they incorporated our ideas into the final bill and have continued to seek data and input on legislative proposals. When the administration released its 2010 budget, we created an online guide to the tax proposals, providing detailed commentary on key provisions. Bill Gale and Alan Auerbach presented a "shadow budget" of more realistic projections over the 10-year and long-term horizon that was cited frequently by the news media. Later in the year, Bill and Alan evaluated the economic effects of stimulus options at the Federal Reserve’s annual conference in Jackson Hole. While saving the economy and the financial system occupied most of the policy space in Washington, many other issues were front and center. Our commentary, testimony, and analysis of ways to pay for health care reform helped inform the contentious and ongoing policy debate. We showed how to simplify and improve the complicated and sometimes contradictory rules low- income families face when trying to claim tax credits. And we worked hard to educate policymakers on the merits of using carbon taxes to address climate change. Although policymakers were busy with a host of nontax issues, we were pleased and honored to host separate events featuring Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Representative Paul Ryan (R-WI), each of whom presented his proposal for sweeping reform of the federal tax system and addressed audience questions as part of our Tax Reform 2.0 series. The integration of analysis and outreach efforts has always been a TPC hallmark. This year, our scholars testified before Congress on issues ranging from the nation’s fiscal challenges to the use of a carbon tax to address climate change and a dramatic new proposal to use a value-added tax to pay for universal health care coverage. We hosted 16 public forums where the nation’s leading experts discussed everything from corporate taxes to taxation of families with children to long-term care. TaxVox, named one of the country’s top economic blogs by The Wall Street Journal, has become a go-to forum on critical tax and fiscal policy, receiving almost 2.5 million page views in 2009. We are proud to have expanded our role in 2009 as a critical resource for nonpartisan, objective, timely, and careful tax policy analysis. As in the past, the news media magnified the reach of our analysis and commentary. Other nonprofits and advocacy organizations spanning the political spectrum used and cited our analysis to strengthen their cases. As the country’s challenges grow, we expect TPC to have many more opportunities to illuminate and contribute to the policy debate. None of this could have happened without the continuing dedication of TPC staff. We experienced several important personnel changes during the year. Len Burman left his position as TPC director to become the first Daniel Patrick Moynihan Professor of Public Affairs at Syracuse University. Len maintains close ties with TPC. We are indebted to Len for his creative, energetic, and visionary leadership of TPC over many years. Rosanne Altshuler replaced Len as TPC director, joining us from Rutgers University. Rosanne’s background in both academia and public policy and her great enthusiasm for TPC’s mission have made the transition seamless and productive. Our roster of experienced and committed staff grew as we welcomed back co-founder Eugene Steuerle and brought in two additional scholars. Ted Gayer is co-director of the Economic Studies program and the Joseph A. Pechman Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution, where he focuses on taxes, housing, and climate change issues. He is also coauthor, with Harvey Rosen, of a popular undergraduate public finance textbook. Joe Rosenberg, who joined TPC from UC- Berkeley, focuses on tax and fiscal policy options, using our microsimulation federal tax model. Our crew expanded even further with the visits of two distinguished professors who spent their sabbaticals with us. Daniel Halperin from Harvard Law School and Lawrence Lokken from the University of Florida’s Levin College of Law added a legal perspective to our analyses and contributed thought-provoking posts to TaxVox. At TPC, we see ourselves as the policy equivalent of nautical chartmakers. We use our microsimulation model and analytical skills to map tax policy’s dangerous shoals. We point lawmakers and opinion shapers to the most direct route to their economic goals. And our communications tools— our website, our TaxVox blog, and our public events—are lighthouses that warn of trouble ahead and help show the way to safe passage. And, even though as upstanding tax professionals we don't party like sailors, we do manage to have a lot of fun in the process. We are extremely grateful for your continued interest in our work. Rosanne Altshuler William Gale Table of Contents 2 Letter from the Directors 5 Productivity at a Glance, 2009 6 Obama Takes the Helm 7 Fiscal Shoals Ahead 8 Reform on the Horizon 12 Charting the Seas 14 Safety Net 16 Anchors TPC microsimulation model, TaxVox, TPC website, public forums,e-mail newsletters, media coverage,social networking 18 Partners 18 On the Horizon in 2010 19 Treasures 20 Staff 22 Advisors 23 Communication Products Congressional testimony, research publications, opinion editorials,TaxVox articles 30 Leveraging TPC Analysis Productivity at a Glance, 2009 56 discussion papers, research reports, policy briefs, articles, and commentaries Research and 4 testimonies before Congress Testimony 212 TaxVox blog entries 15 public policy symposia attracting 4,200 guests (in person or via webcast) Public Outreach 2.42 million page views of TaxVox blog, almost 150 percent more than in 2008 508 distributional and revenue estimates Model Development 2 complete model updates Featured in almost 700 major media articles, 14 Media network television news programs, and 29 radio programs 1 million unique visits Website 7 million web hits 5 Obama Takes the Helm President Obama ran his presidential campaign the proposals, provided links to more detailed on a platform of change. He presented a commentary on key provisions, and comprehensive tax plan to raise taxes on high- showcased our distributional analyses of the income taxpayers and provide tax cuts for low- overall budget and its major components. The and middle-income households. In the last report—part of a “2010 Budget” Tax Topics month of the campaign, candidate Obama page on our website—remains a useful guide offered specific tax-related proposals to to tax policy issues. address some of the problems created by the Along with print, broadcast, and web- rapidly worsening economy. One of TPC’s based media, Capitol Hill found our budget most downloaded publications in 2009, tool right on the money. Our staff was invited President-Elect Obama’s Tax and Stimulus to brief members’ legislative aides as well as Plans, examined the possible effects of the tax the tax staff of the Senate Finance Committee. and stimulus plans Obama offered during his We recently released a similar web resource campaign. for the 2011 budget. As soon as he assumed office, President Obama began laying the groundwork for an economic stimulus plan. TPC’s timely analysis helped set the course. We created the Tax Stimulus Report Cards, the first comprehensive analyses of the stimulus "The poor spend almost all additional money initiatives that were working their way through that they have coming in. They have lots and Congress. These web resources described how lots of needs, relative to their incomes. They the House and Senate plans would change need every dollar they can have, and a new current tax law and analyzed how their dollar in the door goes out pretty quickly." provisions would affect the budget and the Roberton Williams, “What's In the Stimulus for economy. We estimated how each proposal’s Workers,” by Nancy Cordes, CBS Evening News, benefits would be distributed among taxpayers February 12 in different economic situations, gave each provision a grade and, most important, suggested ways to improve the proposals. We developed three report cards: one for the House bill, one for the Senate bill, and one “Anyone looking for useful information on the for the final bill, the American Recovery and House and Senate economic stimulus bills to Reinvestment Act of 2009. In response, answer the all-important question: will they congressional staff contacted us to learn more actually work to jump-start the economy? about how to improve provisions that received should refer to the Tax Policy Center’s ‘Tax low grades.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019-Annual-Report.Pdf
    2019 URBAN INSTITUTE ANNUAL REPORT A Message from the President Dear Friends, Inspired by our 50th anniversary, the Urban Institute kicked off our next 50 years in 2019 with a renewed commitment to advancing upward mobility, equity, and shared prosperity. We also collaborated with changemakers across the country to develop innovative ideas for how Urban could best fulfill our mission in light of trends likely to bring disruptive change in the decades to come. We did not expect such change to arrive in 2020 in the form of a pandemic that has exposed so many fissures in our society, including the disproportionate vulnerability of people of color to health and economic risks. Nor did we anticipate the powerful uprisings that have called needed attention to police brutality, antiblackness, and racism in our country. But as I consider the work Urban is undertaking to inform an inclusive recovery from the coronavirus pandemic and dismantle the systems and structures that drive racism, I am grateful for the many partners who, by engaging with our Next50 initiative in 2019, helped Urban accelerate the development of capacities and initiatives that are having an impact. Among the ways our work made a difference last year: ▪ Influencing efforts to boost Black homeownership. Our groundbreaking work on dramatic declines in Black homeownership helped make the issue an urgent concern in advocacy and policy circles. Urban delivered powerful new findings showing how a set of housing finance innovations can build wealth in communities of color. We also helped launch a collaborative effort with real estate professionals, lenders, and nonprofit leaders to amplify and solidify a framework for reducing the racial homeownership gap.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding Insurance Coverage for Children
    XPANDING E INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR CHILDREN John Holahan XPANDING EINSURANCE COVERAGE FOR CHILDREN John Holahan Copyright © 1997. The Urban Institute. All rights reserved. Except for short quotes, no part of this publication may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photo- copying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system, with- out written permission from the Urban Institute. BOARD OF TRUSTEES URBAN INSTITUTE is a non- Richard B. Fisher profit policy research and educa- Chairman tional organization established in Joel L. Fleishman Vice Chairman Washington, D.C., in 1968. Its staff Katharine Graham investigates the social and economic Vice Chairman William Gorham problems confronting the nation and President public and private means to alleviate Jeffrey S. Berg Joan Toland Bok them. The Institute disseminates sig- Marcia L. Carsey nificant findings of its research Carol Thompson Cole Richard C. Green, Jr. through the publications program of Jack Kemp its Press. The goals of the Institute are Robert S. McNamara to sharpen thinking about societal Charles L. Mee, Jr. Robert C. Miller problems and efforts to solve them, Lucio Noto improve government decisions and Hugh B. Price Sol Price performance, and increase citizen Robert M. Solow awareness of important policy choices. Dick Thornburgh Judy Woodruff Through work that ranges from LIFE TRUSTEES broad conceptual studies to adminis- trative and technical assistance, Warren E. Buffett James E. Burke Institute researchers contribute to the Joseph A. Califano, Jr. stock of knowledge available to guide William T. Coleman, Jr. John M. Deutch decision making in the public interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Policy— Unfinished Business
    37th Annual Spring Symposium and State-Local Tax Program Tax Policy— Unfinished Business Tangle of Taxes Health Policy Tax Policy and Retirement Issues in Corporate Taxation Tax Compliance Thoughts for the New Congress The Role of Federal and State Federal Impact on State Spending May 17–18, 2007 Holiday Inn Capitol Washington DC REGISTRATION — Columbia Foyer President Thursday, May 17, 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM Robert Tannenwald Friday, May 18, 8:00 AM - 12:30 PM Program Chair All sessions will meet in the COLUMBIA BALLROOM Thomas Woodward Executive Director J. Fred Giertz Thursday, May 17 8:45–9:00 AM WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION 9:00–10:30 AM ROUNDTABLE: RICHARD MUSGRAVE REMEMBERED Organizer: Diane Lim Rogers, Committee on the Budget, U.S. House of Representatives Moderator: Henry Aaron, The Brookings Institution Discussants: Helen Ladd, Duke University; Wallace Oates, University of Maryland ; Joel Slemrod, University of Michigan 10:30–10:45 AM BREAK 10:45–12:15 PM TANGLES OF TAXES: PROBLEMS IN THE TAX CODE Organizer/Moderator: Roberton Williams Jr., Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center Alex Brill, American Enterprise Institute — The Individual Income Tax After 2010: Post-Permanencism Ellen Harrison, Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP — Estate Planning Under the Bush Tax Cuts Leonard Burman, William Gale, Gregory Leiserson, and Jeffery Rohaly, Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center — The AMT: What’s Wrong and How to Fix It Discussants: Roberta Mann, Widener University School of Law; David Weiner, Congressional Budget Office 12:30–1:45 PM LUNCHEON - DISCOVERY BALLROOM Speaker: Peter Orszag, Director, Congressional Budget Office Presentation of Davie-Davis Award for Public Service 2:00–3:30 PM HEALTH POLICY: THE ROLE FOR TAXES Organizer: Timothy Dowd, Joint Committee on Taxation Moderator: Alexandra Minicozzi, Office of Tax Analysis, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief of Amici Curiae Bipartisan Economic Scholars
    No. 19-840 In the Supreme Court of the United States _________ CALIFORNIA, ET AL., Petitioners, v. TEXAS, ET AL., Respondents. _________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit _________ BRIEF AMICI CURIAE FOR BIPARTISAN ECONOMIC SCHOLARS IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS _________ SHANNA H. RIFKIN MATTHEW S. HELLMAN JENNER & BLOCK LLP Counsel of Record 353 N. Clark Street JENNER & BLOCK LLP Chicago, IL 60654 1099 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 639-6000 May 13, 2020 [email protected] i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......................................... iii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE .................................. 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ....................................................................... 3 ARGUMENT ....................................................................... 5 I. The Fifth Circuit’s Severability Analysis Lacks Any Economic Foundation And Would Cause Egregious Harm To Those Currently Enrolled In Medicaid And Private Individual Market Insurance As Well As Health Care Providers. ....................................................................... 5 A. Economic Data Establish That The ACA Markets Can Operate Without The Mandate. ................................................................... 5 B. There Is No Economic Reason Why Congress Would Have Wanted The Myriad Other Provisions In The ACA To Be Invalidated. ....................................................... 10 II. Because The ACA Can Operate Effectively Without
    [Show full text]
  • HAMILTON Achieving Progressive Tax Reform PROJECT in an Increasingly Global Economy Strategy Paper JUNE 2007 Jason Furman, Lawrence H
    THE HAMILTON Achieving Progressive Tax Reform PROJECT in an Increasingly Global Economy STRATEGY PAPER JUNE 2007 Jason Furman, Lawrence H. Summers, and Jason Bordoff The Brookings Institution The Hamilton Project seeks to advance America’s promise of opportunity, prosperity, and growth. The Project’s economic strategy reflects a judgment that long-term prosperity is best achieved by making economic growth broad-based, by enhancing individual economic security, and by embracing a role for effective government in making needed public investments. Our strategy—strikingly different from the theories driving economic policy in recent years—calls for fiscal discipline and for increased public investment in key growth- enhancing areas. The Project will put forward innovative policy ideas from leading economic thinkers throughout the United States—ideas based on experience and evidence, not ideology and doctrine—to introduce new, sometimes controversial, policy options into the national debate with the goal of improving our country’s economic policy. The Project is named after Alexander Hamilton, the nation’s first treasury secretary, who laid the foundation for the modern American economy. Consistent with the guiding principles of the Project, Hamilton stood for sound fiscal policy, believed that broad-based opportunity for advancement would drive American economic growth, and recognized that “prudent aids and encouragements on the part of government” are necessary to enhance and guide market forces. THE Advancing Opportunity, HAMILTON Prosperity and Growth PROJECT Printed on recycled paper. THE HAMILTON PROJECT Achieving Progressive Tax Reform in an Increasingly Global Economy Jason Furman Lawrence H. Summers Jason Bordoff The Brookings Institution JUNE 2007 The views expressed in this strategy paper are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of The Hamilton Project Advisory Council or the trustees, officers, or staff members of the Brookings Institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation: Rebuild by Design Phase I June 2014
    EVALUATION OFFICE EVALUATION THE Rockefeller Foundation Rockefeller Evaluation: Rebuild by Design Phase I June 2014 Financial support provided by About the Urban Institute Founded in 1968 to understand the problems facing America’s cities and assess the programs of the War on Poverty, the Urban Institute brings decades of objective analysis and expertise to policy debates – in city halls and state houses, Congress and the White House, and emerging democracies around the world. Today, our research portfolio ranges from the social safety net to health and tax policies; the well-being of families and neigh- borhoods; and trends in work, earnings, and wealth building. Our scholars have a distin- guished track record of turning evidence into solutions. About the Rockefeller Foundation Evaluation Office For more than 100 years, the Rockefeller Foundation’s mission has been to promote the well-being of humanity throughout the world. Today, the Rockefeller Foundation pursues this mission through dual goals: advancing inclusive economies that expand opportunities for more broadly shared prosperity, and building resilience by helping people, communi- ties and institutions prepare for, withstand and emerge stronger from acute shocks and chronic stresses. Committed to supporting learning, accountability and performance im- provements, the Evaluation Office of the Rockefeller Foundation works with staff, grantees and partners to strengthen evaluation practice and to support innovative approaches to monitoring, evaluation and learning. Cover photo: Cameron Blaylock Evaluation: Rebuild by Design Phase I June 2014 THE Rockefeller Foundation Rockefeller EVALUATION OFFICE EVALUATION Financial support provided by The contents of this report are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Rockefeller Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Report of the President.” ______
    REFERENCES Chapter 1 American Civil Liberties Union. 2013. “The War on Marijuana in Black and White.” Accessed January 31, 2016. Aizer, Anna, Shari Eli, Joseph P. Ferrie, and Adriana Lleras-Muney. 2014. “The Long Term Impact of Cash Transfers to Poor Families.” NBER Working Paper 20103. Autor, David. 2010. “The Polarization of Job Opportunities in the U.S. Labor Market.” Center for American Progress, the Hamilton Project. Bakija, Jon, Adam Cole and Bradley T. Heim. 2010. “Jobs and Income Growth of Top Earners and the Causes of Changing Income Inequality: Evidence from U.S. Tax Return Data.” Department of Economics Working Paper 2010–24. Williams College. Boskin, Michael J. 1972. “Unions and Relative Real Wages.” The American Economic Review 62(3): 466-472. Bricker, Jesse, Lisa J. Dettling, Alice Henriques, Joanne W. Hsu, Kevin B. Moore, John Sabelhaus, Jeffrey Thompson, and Richard A. Windle. 2014. “Changes in U.S. Family Finances from 2010 to 2013: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances.” Federal Reserve Bulletin, Vol. 100, No. 4. Brown, David W., Amanda E. Kowalski, and Ithai Z. Lurie. 2015. “Medicaid as an Investment in Children: What is the Long-term Impact on Tax Receipts?” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 20835. Card, David, Thomas Lemieux, and W. Craig Riddell. 2004. “Unions and Wage Inequality.” Journal of Labor Research, 25(4): 519-559. 331 Carson, Ann. 2015. “Prisoners in 2014.” Bureau of Justice Statistics, Depart- ment of Justice. Chetty, Raj, Nathaniel Hendren, Patrick Kline, Emmanuel Saez, and Nich- olas Turner. 2014. “Is the United States Still a Land of Opportunity? Recent Trends in Intergenerational Mobility.” NBER Working Paper 19844.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Stimulus Options in the Aftermath of the Terrorist Attack
    TAX STIMULUS OPTIONS IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE TERRORIST ATTACK By William Gale, Peter Orszag, and Gene Sperling William Gale is the Joseph A. Pechman Senior outlook thus suggests the need for policies that Fellow in Economic Studies at the Brookings Institu- stimulate the economy in the short run. The budget tion. Peter Orszag is Senior Fellow in Economic outlook suggests that the long-run revenue impact Studies at the Brookings Institution. Gene Sperling is of stimulus policies should be limited, so as to avoid Visiting Fellow in Economic Studies at the Brookings exacerbating the nation’s long-term fiscal challen- Institution, and served as chief economic adviser to ges, which would raise interest rates and undermine President Clinton. The authors thank Henry Aaron, the effectiveness of the stimulus. Michael Armacost, Alan Auerbach, Leonard Burman, In short, say the authors, the most effective Christopher Carroll, Robert Cumby, Al Davis, Eric stimulus package would be temporary and maxi- Engen, Joel Friedman, Jane Gravelle, Robert mize its “bang for the buck.” It would direct the Greenstein, Richard Kogan, Iris Lav, Alice Rivlin, Joel largest share of its tax cuts toward spurring new Slemrod, and Jonathan Talisman for helpful discus- economic activity, and it would minimize long-term sions. The opinions expressed represent those of the revenue losses. This reasoning suggests five prin- authors and should not be attributed to the staff, of- ciples for designing the most effective tax stimulus ficers, or trustees of the Brookings Institution. package: (1) Allow only temporary, not permanent, In the aftermath of the recent terrorist attacks, the items.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes for Tax Policy Course
    Tax Politics and Policy Preliminary Syracuse University PAI 730-16 Subject to Change January 2018 Professor Len Burman Classroom Room C119 Center for Strategic and International Studies 1616 Rhode Island Ave, NW Office From January 2-12, CSIS, 4th floor Hours: 4:00-5:00, M-Th (starting January 2) Other times by appointment My e-mail address: [email protected] Read this syllabus; refer back to it if you have questions. I expect you to understand and meet the requirements specified here even if I do not discuss them in class. If you have questions or concerns about what is in the syllabus (or left out), please let me know, but look at the syllabus before asking about course requirements. This syllabus will be posted on the class Blackboard website and will be updated to reflect any changes. Schedule/Important Dates: Class Date Morning Afternoon 1 October 15 Monday 5:00-7:00 In Syracuse* Week 1 In DC 2 January 2 Wednesday 1:00-4:00 C114 3,4 January 3 Thursday 10:00-12:30 1:30-4:00 C114 5,6 January 4 Friday 10:00-12:30 1:30-4:00 C114 Week 2 7,8 January 7 Monday 10:00-12:30 1:30-4:00 C114 9,10 January 8 Tuesday 10:00-12:30 1:30-4:00 C114 11 January 9 Wednesday 1:00-4:00 C114 12,13 January 10 Thursday 10:00-12:30 1:30-4:00 C114 14 March 1? Friday 1:00-5:30 Syracuse** * The first class is an introductory class.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Policy in the Great Society, Part Two
    Joint Center for Housing Studies Harvard University Into the Wild Blue Yonder: The Urban Crisis, Rocket Science, and the Pursuit of Transformation Housing Policy in the Great Society, Part Two Alexander von Hoffman March 2011 W11-3 The research for this working paper was conducted with the support of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, The Ford Foundation, and the Fannie Mae Foundation. © by Alexander von Hoffman. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Off we go into the wild blue yonder, Climbing high into the sun Introduction Of the several large and important domestic housing and urban programs produced by Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society administration, the best-known is Model Cities. Although it lasted only from 1966 to 1974, its advocates believed Model Cities had promised a better tomorrow for America’s cities and bitterly lamented its termination—blaming Richard Nixon’s policies, diversion of funds for the Vietnam war, and the nation’s lack of commitment to social progress. Yet the legislation that created Model Cities was ambitious, contradictory, and vague. As such, it vividly expressed the idealistic impulses, currents of thought, and reactions to events that converged, however incoherently, in national urban policy of the 1960s. At the center of the fervor for domestic policy was the president of the United States, Lyndon Johnson, who hungered for dramatic new programs that would transform the country the way New Deal policies had reshaped America in his youth.
    [Show full text]
  • EFFECTS of the TAX CUTS and JOBS ACT: a PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS William G
    EFFECTS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT: A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS William G. Gale, Hilary Gelfond, Aaron Krupkin, Mark J. Mazur, and Eric Toder June 13, 2018 ABSTRACT This paper examines the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017, the largest tax overhaul since 1986. The new tax law makes substantial changes to the rates and bases of both the individual and corporate income taxes, cutting the corporate income tax rate to 21 percent, redesigning international tax rules, and providing a deduction for pass-through income. TCJA will stimulate the economy in the near term. Most models indicate that the long-term impact on GDP will be small. The impact will be smaller on GNP than on GDP because the law will generate net capital inflows from abroad that have to be repaid in the future. The new law will reduce federal revenues by significant amounts, even after allowing for the modest impact on economic growth. It will make the distribution of after-tax income more unequal, raise federal debt, and impose burdens on future generations. When it is ultimately financed with spending cuts or other tax increases, as it must be in the long run, TCJA will, under the most plausible scenarios, end up making most households worse off than if TCJA had not been enacted. The new law simplifies taxes in some ways but creates new complexity and compliance issues in others. It will raise health care premiums and reduce health insurance coverage and will have adverse effects on charitable contributions and some state and local governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
    Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Mark W. Everson Commissioner Mark J. Mazur Director, Research, Analysis, and Statistics Janice M. Hedemann Director, Office of Research IRS Research Bulletin Recent Research on Tax Administration and Compliance Selected Papers Given at the 2006 IRS Research Conference Georgetown University School of Law Washington, DC June 14-15, 2006 Compiled and Edited by James Dalton and Beth Kilss* Statistics of Income Division Internal Revenue Service *Prepared under the direction of Janet McCubbin, Chief, Special Studies Branch IRS Research Bulletin iii Foreword This edition of the IRS Research Bulletin (Publication 1500) features selected papers from the latest IRS Research Conference, held at the Georgetown Uni- versity School of Law in Washington, DC, on June 14-15, 2006. Conference presenters and attendees included researchers from all areas of IRS, represen- tatives of other government agencies (including from the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand), and academic and private sector experts on tax policy, tax administration, and tax compliance. The conference began with a keynote address by Mark Matthews, Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement. Mr. Matthews emphasized the importance of using high-quality data and analysis to drive key decisions. Mark Mazur, Director, Research, Analysis and Statistics, then led a panel discus- sion on compliance and administrative aspects of tax reform. The panelists, including former Assistant Secretaries for Tax Policy Pamela Olson and Ronald Pearlman, former Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tax Analysis Leonard Burman, and Jane Gravelle of the Congressional Research Service, emphasized the need to use data and analysis to inform policies as they are first being formulated, rather than after positions have hardened.
    [Show full text]