Upper Cambrian-Lower Ordovician Notch Peak Formation in Western Utah
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1393
^^ M Upper Cambrian-Lower Ordovician Notch Peak Formation in Western Utah
By LEHI F. HINTZE, Brigham Young University, MICHAEL E. TAYLOR, U.S. Geological Survey, and JAMES F. MILLER, Southwest Missouri State University
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1393
Lithostratigraphy, biostratigraphy, and regional correlations of the Notch Peak Formation and descriptions of three new members
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1988 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Dallas L. Peck, Director
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Hintze, Lehi F. Upper Cambrian-Lower Ordovician Notch Peak Formation in western Utah. (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1393) "Lithostratigraphy, biostratigraphy, and regional correlations of the Notch Peak Formation and descriptions of three new members." Bibliography: p. Includes index. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1393 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cambrian. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic Ordovician. 3. Geology Utah. I. Taylor, Michael E. II. Miller, James Frederick, 1943- . III. Title. IV. Series: Geological Survey professional paper ; 1393. QE656.H56 1987 551.7'23 86-600020
For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS
Page Page Abstract ...... 1 Measured sections of the Notch Peak Formation ...... 20 Introduction ...... 1 Type section of the Notch Peak Formation, House Range, Acknowledgments ...... 1 Utah ...... 20 Notch Peak Formation boundaries ...... 2 Reference sections of the Notch Peak Formation ..... 21 Age of the Notch Peak Formation ...... 2 Principal reference section of the Notch Peak Forma Members of the Notch Peak Formation ...... 4 tion and the type sections for its Hellnmaria, Red Hellnmaria Member (new) ...... 4 Tops, and Lava Dam Members ...... 21 Red Tops Member (new) ...... 6 Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam section, southern House Lava Dam Member (new) ...... 6 Range, Utah ...... 23 Notch Peak Formation correlatives in Utah and Nevada 7 Lawson Cove section, Wah Wah Mountains, Utah . 26 Biostratigraphy ...... Fish Springs Range section, Utah ...... 28 Conodonts ...... References cited ...... 29 Trilobites ...... 16
ILLUSTRATIONS
PLATE 1. Ranges of conodonts, trilobites, and some other fossils in the Notch Peak Formation and lower part of the House Limestone in the Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam section, southern House Range, Utah ...... In Pocket
Page FIGURE 1. Map showing location of stratigraphic sections discussed in text and shown on figures 2 and 3 ...... 2 2. Chart showing correlation of the Notch Peak Formation with units in adjacent areas ...... 3 3. Columnar sections of the Notch Peak Formation described herein under "Measured Sections" ...... 5 4. Chart showing correlation of conodont and trilobite zones and subzones with the Notch Peak Formation ...... 7 5. Chart showing ranges of conodonts in the principal reference section of the Notch Peak Formation, central House Range, Utah ...... 9 6. Correlation chart of lithostratigraphic and some conodont biostratigraphic units between the Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam section and principal reference section of the Notch Peak Formation ...... 16 7-11. Maps showing: 7. Location of principal reference section of the Notch Peak Formation in the central House Range, Utah . 21 8. Location of the Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam section, southern House Range, Utah ...... 23 9. Geology of area in the vicinity of the principal reference section of the Lava Dam Member of the Notch Peak Formation ...... 24 10. Location of the Lawson Cove section, Wah Wah Mountains, Utah ...... 26 11. Location of the Fish Springs Range section, Utah ...... 28
TABLES
Page TABLE 1. Conodont distribution in the principal reference section of the Notch Peak Formation and lower House Limestone, central House Range, Utah ...... 10 2. Conodont distribution in the Notch Peak Formation in the Steamboat Pass segment of the Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam section, southern House Range, Utah ...... 12 3. Conodont distribution in the Notch Peak Formation and lower House Limestone in the Lava Dam segment of the Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam section, southern House Range, Utah ...... 14 4. Occurrences of trilobites and some other fossils in the Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam section of the Notch Peak and House Formations ...... 18
UPPER CAMBRIAN-LOWER ORDOVICIAN NOTCH PEAK FORMATION IN WESTERN UTAH
By LEHI F. HiNTZE, 1 MICHAEL E. TAYLOR,2 and JAMES F. MILLER3
ABSTRACT seems clear, but certain aspects of the definition are am biguous enough to have created problems for later Three mappable members in the Notch Peak Formation in western stratigraphers and geologic mappers. First, Walcott Utah are recognized, named, and defined. In ascending order, these did not indicate a stratigraphic top to the formation. are the Hellnmaria, Red Tops, and Lava Dam Members. All members are limestone or dolomite; the Red Tops consists of thin-bedded Second, Walcott did not identify the location of his bioclastic lime grainstone, whereas the other members are more measured section precisely enough to enable it to be massive, finer textured, and include many high-relief hemispherical retraced. Third, the Ordovician age assignment that stromatolites. The formation ranges from a maximum thickness of Walcott made for fossils collected on the summit of 557 meters (m) in the Wah Wah Mountains at the south edge of the area studied to 368 m in the Fish Springs Range at the north edge. Notch Peak is incorrect. Geologic mapping by Hintze Trilobites representing the Taenicephalus and Idahoia Zones of the (1974a-e) has traced the formation in the House and Franconian Stage have been obtained from the Hellnmaria Member. Confusion Ranges and the Wah Wah Mountains in The Red Tops Member contains trilobites of the Trempealeauan western Utah (fig. 1) and has delineated three mappa Saukiella junta Subzone of the Saukia Zone; the Lava Dam Member ble members there. This paper defines these members, contains faunas of the Trempealeauan Saukiella serotina andEurekia apopsis Subzones of the Saukia Zone, the Lower Ordovician Missis- describes them in type sections and other reference sec quoia depressa and Missisquoia typicalis Subzones of the Missisquoia tions, and documents the biostratigraphic control on Zone and the Symphysurina brevispicata Subzone of the Sym- their ages. physurina Zone. Two conodont zones and seven subzones have been recognized in the Red Tops and Lava Dam Members of the Notch Peak Formation. The Proconodontus muelleri and Eoconodontus notchpeakensis Sub- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS zones of the Proconodontus Zone correspond approximately to the Saukiella junia trilobite Subzone in the Red Tops Member. The Cam- brooistodus minutus Subzone of the Proconodontus Zone correlates This study is an outgrowth of a geologic mapping pro approximately to the Saukiella serotina Subzone in the lower part of gram in western Utah conducted by L. F. Hintze under the Lava Dam Member. The Hirsutodontus hirsutus Subzone of the the cooperative auspicies of Brigham Young Universi Cordylodus proavus Zone corresponds to the Eurekia apopsis Sub- ty, the Utah Geological and Mineral Survey, and the zone and the overlying Missisquoia depressa Subzone. The Fryx- ellodontus inornatus and Clavohamulus elongatus Subzones of the U.S. Geological Survey. Trilobite studies by M. E. Cordylodus proavus Zone correspond approximately to the range of Taylor were supported by Geological Society of America the Missisquoia typicalis Subzone. The Hirsutodontus simplex and grants 1082-66 and 1221-69 and by the U.S. Geological Clavohamulus hintzei Subzones of the Cordylodus proavus Zone cor Survey after 1969. National Science Foundation grants respond to the lower part of the Symphysurina Zone in the uppermost to D. L. Clark supported J. F. Miller's conodont studies part of the Lava Dam Member and the lowermost part of the overly ing House Limestone. from 1965-70. Additional grants to J. F. Miller were from the Geological Society of America, Society of Sigma Xi, Research Corporation, University of Utah INTRODUCTION Faculty Research Committee, and Southwest Missouri State University Faculty Research Committee. We ex The Notch Peak Formation is the uppermost of sev press appreciation to Donald McMillan, former Direc eral Cambrian formations named by Walcott (1908a,b) tor of the Utah Geological and Mineral Survey, for his in the House Range. The intent of Walcott's definition interest in and support of the program, and to M. D. Crittenden, Jr., R. K. Hose, H. T. Morris, and G. W.
'Department of Geology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 Walker of the U.S. Geological Survey for their en 2U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS 919, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado couragement and help with various aspects of this 80225 study. J. R. Derby is thanked for allowing us to incor 3Geosciences Department, Southwest Missouri State University, Springfield, Missouri 65804-0089 porate into the study some fossils that he collected. l UPPER CAMBRIAN-LOWER ORDOVICIAN NOTCH PEAK FORMATION IN WESTERN UTAH
114° 112° 110° was not delineated by Walcott (1908a,b) because his
IDAHO 1 measured section ended with the uppermost beds ex posed on the summit of Notch Peak. Hintze (1951, p. 12) defined the top of the Notch Peak Formation in the I ~ 1 WYOMING y ( Great Salt House Range by formally recognizing the Ordovician 1 S M p~ Lafce House Limestone as the stratigraphic unit immediate ly overlying the "more massive Notch Peak Lime stone." Hintze designated a locality on the south flank ^Aj) Q SALT LAKE CITY of Notch Peak (see Hintze, 1973, for locality map) as ^ Sheeprock the type locality for the House Limestone. The geologic | Deep Creek Mountains contacts shown on the map of the Notch Peak quad 40° W 9 Range j 0 Best Tintic Mountains COLOR/' rangle (Hintze, 1974a) are in accordance with Hintze's Dugway Range definition of the Notch Peak-House formational contact. Fish Springs Range It should be noted that Whitebread (1969) did not follow O Hintze's (1951) usage of the Notch Peak-House bound O Snake 'Sneakover Pass, House Renge ary but extended the House Limestone down to include Range 9 \ Southern House Range Cambrian beds possibly equivalent to the upper 1 ^j*Lawson Cove members of the Notch Peak Formation as shown on Weh Wah Mountains 1 figure 2. 38° _ UTAH 1 Dashed outline shows fve 15-mmute ' quadrangles where members of the AGE OF THE NOTCH PEAK FORMATION 1 Notch Peak Formation have been 1 1 mapped by Hintze 11974, a-e) 1 Walcott (1908b, p. 173) stated that the summit of ~ ~ ~ ~ ARIZONA 1 Notch Peak "is formed of 285 feet of Ordovician !i I i ! Limestone...containing near the top a distinct fauna: 0 50 100 KILOMETERS I I Obolus (Westonia) notchensis Walcott I 0 50 MILES Eoorthis coloradoensis (Meek) Raphistoma sp. etc." FIGURE 1. Location of stratigraphic sections discussed in text and We have recollected from the uppermost beds on the shown in figures 2 and 3. summit and identified the following taxa: Bayfieldia n. sp. NOTCH PEAK FORMATION BOUNDARIES Bowmania sp. Euptychaspis sp. indet. The base of the Notch Peak Formation was placed by KeithiellaCl) sp. Walcott (1908a,b) at its contact with the Orr Forma Prosaukia sp. or Saukiella sp. tion on Orr Ridge. Hintze and Palmer (1976, p. G8) high-spired gastropod, gen. and sp. indet. redescribed the Orr Formation at Walcott's type local echinodermal debris ity in the central House Range and noted that the up linguloid brachiopod, gen. and sp. undet. permost member of the Orr, the Sneakover Limestone orthoid brachiopod, gen. and sp. undet. Member, was included within the Notch Peak Forma This fauna can be assigned to either the Saukiella tion on geologic maps by Powell (1959), Hanks (1962), junta or Saukiella serotina Subzone of the Saukia Zone, and Whitebread (1969). Geologic maps by Hintze Trempealeauan Stage. Thus, the beds on the top of the (1974a-e) place the Orr-Notch Peak contact at the peak are now regarded as Cambrian rather than Ordovi horizon originally designated by Walcott. This contact cian as indicated by Walcott. The geologic map (Hint can be readily recognized because the Sneakover ze, 1974a) shows that the summit of Notch Peak is made Limestone Member is somewhat silty and medium to up of strata here designated as the Red Tops Member thick bedded and forms ledges, whereas the massive of the Notch Peak Formation. The strata above the Red basal carbonates of the Notch Peak Formation form Tops Member, herein called the Lava Dam Member, cliffs. Also the Sneakover Limestone Member contains were never discussed by Walcott. They are included phosphatic brachiopods and trilobite fragments, within the Notch Peak Formation because of Hintze's whereas the lower Notch Peak carbonates are nearly (1951) defining the top of the Notch Peak Formation barren of shelly fossils. as the beds beneath the House Limestone. Hintze (1951) The stratigraphic top of the Notch Peak Formation thought that the Cambrian-Ordovician boundary was U P PER CAMBRIAN LOWER FRANCONIAN STAGE TREMPEALEAUAN STAGE ORDOVICIAN
N l rn «> 5 g3 C/3 Q § a. 1!7 N"S |- C w 2: c 2. apopsisEurekia N ED Taenicepha/us Subzone juniaSaukiella ffs- Subzone Zone Missisquoi'a Zone Symp/iysurina o s. Zone s| § S » 0 ^ » z n: ^ ^ ^ o 3 S. 5' E =? Q 5. 9: CD
S. S 3" 5 O CD CD CD M CD M H - V) m S V) m 2 W
< £ C 3" JohnsWash c/> c/J o 22. 3 Limestone Limestone '1)0 ? CD -Illli ^"5 2 <£ CD 0 S CD 0 to $ - < » 5 "> =' OT o> o- * S ' 0> CT "* S- | CD OT 3 S § >. CD CD »co 2 > ' ' Q) £ 3 Q. m m rn \ ) Orr Format! on Notch Peak Form. ition
} C/J _ I Limestone 2 CD I House / 2 CD Sneakover \ CD T> n> Member TopsRed Member Dam m \ 3 "> 3 MemberSJ IPJo M $ ) 3 OT 3 3 1 / ff OT CT m * 5 M cf 1 s. M 3- \( <*-i D)2 " s"s V) m T V) S S \ Orr Formati on Notch Peak Form ition
_ I Limestone S cp_ House JohnsWash Sneakover CD Q. i Member Limestone Member CD n m 3 2. = OT |o* 3 u ?«o 2 m ! I -1 OT 1 ~" a>
r- O3- o Dolomitized Limestone JohnsWash -C-OT. Dolomite o Dolomite Chokecherry upperpart, 3- "a o 7T CD CD D) 0) O E*|: 3" T3 » to 2 1-0-3- 2-=4 CD 0)
z+ < m i
Orr Formation Limestone Formation T) z WashJohns CD o House Member m sf ? » i 3-o 3 = OT o-3 JTo fco 2 CD~" ?< ^m m H""
Dolomite Dugway Formation Garden CD "^ S. City OT | CD CO CD § " CD (O (0 m H
-n o Dolomite Limestones Fillmore 3 ° "5' undivided House- 3 TJ 0) CD X -. X O
m H Ajax Dolomite 1 -n gLimestone Opohonga f 0 3 CD C | If Member Emerald T3 ^. X 3 T3 o CT CD M V) m H S UPPER CAMBRIAN-LOWER ORDOVICIAN NOTCH PEAK FORMATION IN WESTERN UTAH approximately at his Notch Peak-House formational HELLNMARIA MEMBER (NEW) contact. Subsequent work by Miller (1969) and Taylor (1971) suggested that the upper 30 m of the Lava Dam The basal member of the Notch Peak Formation Member of the Notch Peak Formation as used by Hintze derives its name from HelTn Maria Canyon located in (1951; 1974a-e) includes trilobites of the Missisquoia sees. 25, 35, 36, T. 19 S., sees. 3 and 4, T. 20 S., R. 14 Zone and a conodont assemblage that is generally re W., about 5 km (kilometers) south of Notch Peak in the garded in North America as lowermost Ordovician House Range and shown on the 1960 edition of the (Taylor and Halley, 1974; Landing and others, 1978; Notch Peak 15-minute topographic quadrangle. The Miller, 1978, 1980; Miller and others, 1982). The Helln- geographic name part of the geologic name has been maria Member has yielded a few trilobites that are condensed to one word (Hintze, 1973, 1974a-d). The assigned to the Franconian Taenicephalus and Idahoia type section is located in the House Range about 10 km Zones. However, the upper part of the member has not southeast of Notch Peak as described in detail under yielded diagnostic fossils so that the position of the "Measured Sections." The Hellnmaria Member is char boundary between the Franconian and Trempealeauan acteristically a chert-bearing limestone or dolomite that Stages is unknown. forms massive cliffs and ledges. In its type section in The Red 1bps and Lava Dam Members have yielded the House Range the member is entirely limestone; in an abundance of conodonts and trilobites permitting the Fish Springs Range the same interval is almost en rather precise zonation of the upper part of the Notch tirely dolomite (compare columns, fig. 3), and in other Peak Formation. Thus, as indicated on figure 2 and areas it is partly limestone and partly dolomite. discussed in greater detail under the section on "Bio- Whether differences are a result of original depositional stratigraphy," the Notch Peak Formation includes fossils facies differences or post-depositional dolomitization is ranging from upper Franconian, Trempealeauan, to the not known. Lower Ordovician Missisquoia Zone and lowermost The Hellnmaria Member has been subdivided on The Symphysurina Zone. Barn quadrangle geologic map (Hintze, 1974b) into three map units on the basis of locally traceable varia tions in lithology, color, and topographic expression; the MEMBERS OF THE lower map unit of The Barn subdivisions can be ex NOTCH PEAK FORMATION tended southward into the Wah Wah Summit quad rangle (Hintze, 1974e) as well. None of these map units The Notch Peak Formation is entirely limestone and can be recognized to the north in the Notch Peak dolomite and characteristically forms high resistant quadrangle (Hintze, 1974a) or in the Fish Springs Range cliffs that constitute the backbone of several mountain (Hintze, 1980a,b). ranges in western Utah. Within the House Range and Biostratigraphically significant fossils are rare in the northern Wah Wah Mountains, the Notch Peak Forma Hellnmaria Member. Miller (1969, p. 415) reported that tion can be divided into three mappable members samples taken from the Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam sec (Hintze, 1974a-e) based on the occurrence of a bioclastic tion of the Hellnmaria Member (Miller's members 2, 3, lime grains tone sequence, the Red 1bps Member, near and 4 are equivalent to the Hellnmaria Member) yielded the middle of the formation. This member can be easily only rare, undiagnostic conodonts. Trilobites are also traced in the field and on aerial photographs because rare in the Hellnmaria Member. A fauna assigned to the it is thinly bedded and forms benches, slopes, and low upper Franconian Taenicephalus Zone was collected ledges in contrast to the more resistant cliff-forming (USGS locality D2831-CO) 20 m above the base of the members above and below. In addition, the Red 1bps Hellnmaria Member in the Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam Member weathers light brown in contrast to the typical section. Faunas of approximately the same age occur ly drab grays of the other two members of the forma in the underlying Sneakover Limestone Member of the tion. Where the Red 1bps Member is absent, as in the Orr Formation (Hintze and Palmer, 1976, p. G10). An Fish Springs Range (fig. 3), the Notch Peak Formation assemblage (USGS locality 8343-CO) assigned to the has not been subdivided. upper Franconian Idahoia Zone was collected from an The principal reference section of the Notch Peak For unknown horizon in the Hellnmaria Member near U.S. mation is here established in the House Range in Ts. 19 Highway 50, about 7.8 km east of Skull Rock Pass, cen and 20 S., R. 13 W, Notch Peak, Utah quadrangle, as tral House Range. discussed under "Measured Sections." In addition, three The polyplacophoran mollusk Matthevia (Yochelson, reference sections are described in order to show the var 1966; Runnegar and others, 1979) is common in the mid iations in lithology and fossil content embraced under dle map unit of the Hellnmaria Member in the southern the present definition of the Notch Peak Formation. House Range. There, Matthevia is usually coarsely MEMBERS OF THE NOTCH PEAK FORMATION
Southern House Range, House Range, Wah Wah Mountains, Steamboat Pass to Sneakover Pass Fish Springs Range, Lawson Cove Red Tops to Little Valley Hill 6559 House Eroded EXPLANATION
Limestone
Dolomite
Intraformational conglomerate
Calcarenite
Oolites or pisolites
Stromatolites
Chert
FOSSIL HORIZON SYMBOLS Conodont collection (Miller, 1969} Symphysurina trilobite assemblage Missisquoia trilobite assemblage Eurekia apopsis trilobite assemblage Saukietla serotina trilobite assemblage Saukietla junta trilobite assemblage Mattheuia (mollusc) occurrence Matherella (gastropod) occurrence Idahoia trilobite assemblage Taenicephalus trilobite assemblage Elvinia trilobite assemblage
METERS FEET 100-) 90- -300 80- 70- 60- -200 50- 40- 30 -100 20
SALT LAKE CITY UTAH
House Range j A! Southern House Range l-iWah Wen Mountains
Dashad ouilina shows fiva 15-minuta quadrangles whara mamberi of Notch Peak Formation hava been mapped by Hintza (1974 a-a)
FIGURE 3. Columnar sections of the Notch Peak Formation described herein under "Measured Sections." 6 UPPER CAMBRIAN-LOWER ORDOVICIAN NOTCH PEAK FORMATION IN WESTERN UTAH silicified and occurs commonly in association with the groundwater activity during Tertiary or Quaternary gastropod Matherella. The occurrences ofMatthevia are time (Taylor and Glanzman, 1979). strongly facies-controlled and are usually associated The Red Tops Member is found throughout the House with shoal-water carbonate environments that contain Range. Within the Wah Wah Mountains it thins rapid abundant high-relief stromatolites (Yochelson and ly to the southwest, diminishing to half its ordinary Taylor, 1974; Runnegar and others, 1979). Where in thickness in the House Range. The Red Tops Member dependent biostratigraphic data are available, Mat- does not occur in the Fish Springs Range. Whether it thevia is of early Trempealeauan age. Some occurrences is represented there by dolomite or whether it has been lack associated trilobites and could be as old as late eroded by pre-House Limestone beveling on the flank Franconian (Runnegar and others, 1979). of the Tooele Arch (Hintze, 1973a) is not certain. Stromatolites were recognized as an important part Conodonts from the Red Tops Member were de of the Notch Peak Formation by Hose (1961), who il scribed by Miller (1969), who identified the Red Tops lustrated some examples. Similar stromatolites have as member five in his measured sections. The Pro- been described by Taylor and Cook (1976) from the conodontus muelleri, Eoconodontus notchpeakensis, Whipple Cave Formation of Kellogg (1963) in eastern and lower part of the Cambrooistodus minutus Sub- Nevada and by Campbell (1976) from the Trempeale zones of the Proconodontus Zone, of middle Trempeale auan Dotsero Formation in western Colorado. Figure auan age, have been identified in the Red Tops Member 3 shows that stromatolites are common in the upper half (fig. 4 this paper; Miller, 1978). The faunas are discussed of the Hellnmaria Member in the House Range and Wah more thoroughly in the section on "Biostratigraphy" Wah Mountains; they are virtually absent in the Fish and by Miller and others (1982). Springs Range. Stromatolites are useful as indicators Trilobite faunas from the Red Tops Member are of peritidal environments, although they have not been assigned to the Saukiella junta Subzone of the Saukia found to be definitive time markers in the Great Basin; Zone (fig. 4). However, the upper part of the member no occurrence of them in western Utah has been shown has yielded few trilobites and may be as young as the to be laterally extensive enough to serve as a mapping Saukiella serotina Subzone, an interpretation supported horizon except locally. Stromatolites lend a character by conodont correlations to areas where faunas of the istic appearance to the Hellnmaria Member, for they S. serotina Subzone are better represented. weather to form massive, smoothly rounded cliffs.
LAVA DAM MEMBER (NEW) RED TOPS MEMBER (NEW) The Lava Dam Member is named for outcrops on both The Red Tops Member derives its name from that north and south sides of the "Lava Dam," a geologic part of the southern House Range shown as Red Tops feature shown by Hintze (1974b) on The Barn 15-minute in sec. 31, T. 22 S., R. 13 W. on the 1960 edition of The quadrangle in sec. 6, T. 23 S., R. 13 W. Location and Barn 15-minute topographic quadrangle. The type sec description of the type section near Notch Peak are tion is located in the House Range about 8 km southeast given in the section on "Measured Sections." The of Notch Peak. Description of the type section is given Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam reference section for the in the section on "Measured Sections." The Steamboat Notch Peak Formation in the southern House Range Pass-Lava Dam reference section in the southern House is important to the biostratigraphy because it has Range has been more closely sampled for trilobites and yielded abundant conodont and trilobite collections conodonts than has the type section and is thus impor (pl. 1). tant from a biostratigraphic standpoint (Miller and The Lava Dam Member is entirely limestone and in others, 1982). The Red Tops Member consists mostly cludes much stromatolitic limestone and cherty lime of thin-bedded bioclastic lime grainstone that forms stone in the House Range and Wah Wah Mountains. beds less resistant than the more massive members The member usually forms resistant cliffs and ledges above and below. Its light brown weathered color also that contrast topographically with the low ledges and contrasts with the predominantly gray color of the ad rounded slopes of the overlying Pogonip Group. jacent members. Halite and gypsum occur in some out Conodonts described by Miller (1969) came mostly crops of the Red Tops Member in the Steamboat from the Lava Dam Member, which he informally called Pass-Lava Dam section, southern House Range (Miller, member six. Most of the relatively thick Cambrooisto 1978, p. 24). Preliminary petrographic study suggests dus minutus Subzone of the Proconodontus Zone is that the evaporite minerals in the Red Tops are of within the lower part of the member. The remainder of secondary origin and probably were emplaced by the Lava Dam Member is assigned to various subzones NOTCH PEAK FORMATION CORRELATIVE IN UTAH AND NEVADA of the Cordylodus proavus Zone (fig. 4), which is Trilobite Conodont M o Zone 0 § o> Zone equivalent to Fauna A of Ethington and Clark (1971). w Lrtho- Trilobite Conodont e (0 (0 M stratigraphy Subzone Subzone The uppermost part of the C. proavus Zone is in strata assigned to the House Limestone (fig. 4). * Symphysurina bulbosa THlobite faunas allow relatively detailed zonation of Conodont Fauna B the Lava Dam Member. The lower 17 m of the Lava Dam Member have not yielded trilobites, but conodont cor Symphysurina House relations suggest that these beds are equivalent to the Limestone Ctauohamu/us hintzei Symphysun na Saukiella serotina Subzone of the Saukia Zone. Trilobite breuispicata faunas from the Lava Dam Member above 17m are ORDOVICIAN Canadian Hirsutodontus assigned to the S. serotina and Eurekia apopsis Sub- simplex zones of the Saukia Zone; the Missisquoia depressa and Cordylodusproauus Missisquoia typicalis Subzones of the Missisquoia Clauohamulus elongatus Zone; and the lowermost part of the Symphysurina Missisquoia brevispicata Subzone of the Symphysurina Zone (fig. 4). Missisquoia DamMemberLava typicalis Fryxellodontus Following the present North American practice inornatus (Winston and Nicholls, 1967; Taylor and Halley, 1974; Missisquoia Stitt, 1977; Miller and others, 1982), the Cambrian- depressa Hirsutodontus Ordovician boundary is placed at the base of the Missis Eurekia apopsis hirsutus quoia Zone. This horizon is 43.3 m above the base of the Lava Dam Member in the Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam Saukiella Cambrooistodus minutus measured section. This biostratigraphic horizon is serotina recognized by the lowest occurrence of the trilobite
Trempealeauan-i Missisquoia depressa Stitt, which is within the Hir- .a Eoconodontus FormationNotchPeak MemberTopsRed Proconodontus notchpeakensis sutodontus hirsutus conodont Subzone in the southern a CO Saukiella House Range (fig. 4, pi. 1). junta Proconodontus Hintze (1982) proposed the term Ibexian to replace muelleri Canadian for the Lower Ordovician series in North * America. The Cambrian-Ordovician Boundary Working Saukiella MattheuiaZonule Proconodontus Group, International Union of Geological Sciences, is pyrene posterocostatus currently in the process of recommending an interna * * Proconodontus tional stratotype for the Cambrian-Ordovician bound Ef/ipso- tenuiserratus cephaloides ary. We choose to defer formal acceptance of the Ibexian CAMBRIAN Croixan Series until a decision has been made on the system MemberHellnmaria Idahoia boundary. Drumaspis
* NOTCH PEAK FORMATION Idahoia lirae No CORRELATIVES IN UTAH AND NEVADA Franconian Upper Correlative upper Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovi Taenicephalus zonation cian carbonate rocks are known by several names in Utah (fig. 2). Although few fossils have been reported Parabolinoides from these strata, their correlation with the Notch Peak LimestoneSneakover established can be generally established by the widespread occur OrrFormation Member rence ofElvinia Zone trilobites in beds below and Sym physurina Zone trilobites in overlying strata (fig. 2). Eluinia In the Dugway Range (figs. 1 and 2), Staatz and Carr (1964) described 270 m of mostly dolomites as the Dugway Ridge Dolomite. A thin limestone horizon 33 m
FIGURE 4. Correlation of conodont and trilobite zones and subzones with the Notch Peak Formation. Trilobite zonal nomenclature from Winston and Nicholls (1967), Longacre (1970), Stitt (1971, 1977), and Miller and others (1982). Asterisk indicates unit not recognized in Notch Peak Formation or adjacent formations but present elsewhere in biostratigraphic position shown. 8 UPPER CAMBRIAN-LOWER ORDOVICIAN NOTCH PEAK FORMATION IN WESTERN UTAH below the top of the Dugway Ridge Dolomite yielded be regarded as indicative of the Notch Peak Formation. scraps of the trilobite Eurekia(l}. This thin limestone Thus, Whitebread's House Limestone appears to in may correlate with at least part of the Red Tops clude beds that we would include with the upper Member. Species of Eurekia are common in the members of the Notch Peak Formation. Whitebread Saukiella junta and Saukiella serotina Subzones of the (1969) did not differentiate an equivalent of the Saukia Zone. Sneakover Limestone Member of the Orr Formation but Cohenour (1959, p. 57) reported that the Ajax Dolo extended the Notch Peak downsection to the top of the mite in the Sheeprock Mountains is 310 m thick and Corset Spring Shale. However, the basal 210 ft of Notch devoid of fossils. Morris and Levering (1961, p. 48) Peak strata described by Whitebread (1969, p. 5) include reported that the combined Emerald Member and up pinkish-gray and pale-red silty partings that are typical per member of the Ajax Dolomite in the East Tintic of the Sneakover Limestone Member of the Orr. The Mountains are 116m thick; the Ajax bears Eurekia sp. stratigraphic sequence in the southern Snake Range ap near its top. More recently, Taylor and Repetski (1985) pears to be similar to that in the House Range but the reported Lower Ordovician conodonts from the upper easily mappable lithologic-topographic breaks occur at member of the Ajax in the type section. slightly different positions in the two areas. The Notch The St. Charles Formation in northern Utah consists Peak Formation has not been used elsewhere in Nevada. of three members, the lowest of which is the Worm In the southern Egan Range of eastern Nevada, Kellogg Creek Quartzite Member. According to Palmer (1971, (1963) mapped coeval Upper Cambrian carbonates as p. 48) the Worm Creek Quartzite Member is the cor the Whipple Cave Formation. In southeastern Nevada, relative of the Corset Spring Shale Member of the Orr near Pioche, the name Mendha Formation was applied Formation (fig. 2). The unnamed middle limestone by Merriam (1964) to a thick sequence of carbonate member of the St. Charles Formation bears an abun rocks that bear faunas ranging from the Upper Cam dant "Ptychaspis fauna" (Lochman and Hu, 1959) that brian Crepicephalus and Elvinia Zones to the Lower Or is here assigned to the Idahoia Zone of the Franconian dovician Symphysurina and Kainella Zones. The Stage. The upper member of the St. Charles Formation Mendha Formation occurs in an area of much faulting consists of thick to massively bedded dolomite and con and its complete sequence has not been described in tains upper Cordylodus proavus Zone conodonts at least detail, but it includes strata equivalent to the Notch 14m below the top (Landing, 1981; Taylor and Landing, Peak Formation. 1982). The Garden City Formation disconformably overlies the St. Charles in the Bear River Range and contains upper Symphysurina Zone trilobites at its base BIOSTRATIGRAPHY (Ross, 1951; Taylor and Landing, 1982). Thus, the mid dle and upper carbonate members of the St. Charles For CONODONTS mation are approximately equivalent to the Notch Peak Formation. Conodont samples have been studied from part of the In the Deep Creek Range, Nolan (1935) and Bick Notch Peak principal reference section (table 1, fig. 5, (1966) have mapped the Chokecherry Dolomite. Because pi. 1), from the Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam reference of faulting, secondary dolomitization, and beveling of section (tables 2, 3; pi. 1), and from several additional the Chokecherry on the flank of the Ordovician Tooele sections (not reported here) in the House Range. The Arch, the upper and lower boundaries of the formation systematic relations of these conodonts were described are not clearly defined. The only fossil reported from by Miller (1969, 1980), and the biostratigraphy was the part of the Chokecherry that seems most litholog- discussed by Miller (1976, 1978) and Miller and others ically similar to the Notch Peak Formation is Scae- (1982). The conodont fauna! data (tables 1-3) include vogyraC?), a gastropod of limited value for correlation. 24,030 conodonts from 167 samples of limestone and Whitebread (1969) extended the Notch Peak Forma dolomite. The total rock mass processed was 373 kg. tion into the southern Snake Range, Nevada, but he Of the two major sections, the Steamboat Pass-Lava selected different mapping boundaries than were used Dam reference section by far has the more detailed in western Utah. His Notch Peak-House contact was fauna! control. taken at the change from massive cherty limestone, Conodonts are extremely rare in the Hellnmaria below the contact, to thinner bedded but locally massive Member of the Notch Peak Formation. In the lower limestone above. In the stratigraphic section descrip map unit of the Hellnmaria Member in the Steamboat tion that accompanies his map he reported Pass-Lava Dam section, only three conodonts have stromatolites from the lower portion of his House been found, although the member was sampled exten Limestone. In Utah sections, the stromatolites would sively. At 17.4 m above the base of the member, two (/>
M CAMBRIAN ORDOVICIAN a
House Notch Peak Formation Limestone
Hellnmaria Member Member Red Tops Member Lava Dam Member
Zone Conodont Proconodontus Zone Cordylodus proavus Zone
established zonation No notchpeakensisSubzone 51 Proconodontusmuelleri hirsutusHirsutodontus simp/exHirsutodontus hintzeiC/auo/iamu/us SubzoneConodont Subzone Eoconodontus Subzone M 3 X Subzone e/ongatus C/auo/iamu/us Subzone Cambrooistodus minutus Subzone N& 3§ o^& 000. 3 C O a> M = I
" tS3 tS3 tS3 tS3 N) CO CO CO CO U i* -t» iss £ . O 00 0 to -P- tSJ -t» 03 00 0 tSJ -t» 09 00 0 N) 4* 05 OO O N) .p" O3 CO C3 N9 c 0 O C O O O OO O O O O O O O O 00000 O O O O O O C3 O 1 1 1 III 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 BIOSTRATIGRAPHY e N9 -t» O N9 Ji 09 00 O O O O 0 0 0 N9 5. o O s Prooneotodus gallatini (Muller) Prooneotodus rotundatus (Druce and Jones) Proconodontus? primitiuus (Muller) Proconodontus muelleri Miller Eoconodontus notchpeakensis (Miller), rounded element Eoconodontus notchpeakensis (Miller), compressed element Cambrooistodus cambricus (Miller), compressed element 31 Cambrooistodus minutus (Miller), compressed element D) Cordylodus proavus Muller, rounded element Cordylodus proavus Muller, rounded element M Hirsutodontus hirsutus Miller O^ Teridontus nakamurai (Nogami) O o Fryxellodontus inornatus Miller o a Fryxellodontus lineatus Miller o Hirsutodontus rarus Miller (/)o Semiacontiodus nogamii Miller, asymmetrical element Semiacontiodus nogamii Miller, symmetrical element 2. CD Clavohamulus e/ongatus Miller M Utahconus utahensis (Miller) Monocostodus sevierensis (Miller)
Hirsutodontus simplex (Druce and Jones) 1 Cordylodus intermedius Furnish, compressed element Drepanodus? sp. Albiconus postcostatus Miller Utahconus tennis Miller, bicostate element
FIGURE 5. Ranges of conodonts in the principal reference section of the Notch Peak Formation, central House Range, Utah. 10 UPPER CAMBRIAN-LOWER ORDOVICIAN NOTCH PEAK FORMATION IN WESTERN UTAH
TABLE 1. Conodont distribution in the principal reference section of the Notch Peak [Sample numbers identify stratigraphic unit (RT, Red Tops Member; LD, Lava Dam Member; H, House Limestone), followed by the measured distance in feet above the base of the numbers of specimens per sample are given.
Notch Peak Formation
Rad Tops Member (42.7 m) Lave Dam Member (110.9 m)
f~» O CO CM » 00 « f"» r- O ^-OCT) OCT) O)O)O)O)O> OO>O«~ CM CM CO CO CO CNCO^-tOCO CO CM CM o cioddd «-O*-CN
or- co co co
oo in ^ o o ocNcom «-«-cooo «-co^ cot-coco^ cor-cooi- «- «- «- o*~ oico^mco r COCT>T 1 1 1 1 1 | 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 O D O O O O O OOOO
Conodonts: 7 ,,. _ 5 6 - -> 10 T 17 1 1 ^ 2 Prooneotodus rotundatus (Druce and Jones)
29 3 27 46 5 11 11 74 10 8 2 32 j _ . , i i ^ 4 Eocanodontus notchpeakensis (Miller), 2 * 2 ~ 2 1 2 2 3! 2 Eoconodontus notchpeakensis (Miller),
Cambrooistodus cambricus (Miller), ...... 1 ... 1 Cambrooistodus minutus (Miller), ...... 1 2 1 1 Cordylodus proavus Muller, rounded
Cordylodus proavus Muller, compressed
Semiacontiodus nogamii Miller,
Semiacontiodus nogamii Miller,
i Hirsutodontus simplex (Druce and Jones)- - Cordj/Jodus intermedius Furnish,
Utahconus tenuis MiBer, bicostate element- ],.. ... ^ ...... ,i£ »,...... -__ . ... .« .... ._ ^ __, sf,, :i « i : M .._ 42 3 73 82 19 99 22 166 15 16 2 67 4 33 23 2547
Prooneotodus gallatini (Muller) were found, and at 28 isolated sample (USGS loc. 8343-CO) from the Helln m above the base, a single Westergaardodina maria Member approximately 5 km south of the type bicuspidata Muller was found. These species are not section. A list of taxa found at that locality is given in diagnostic of age, but are consistent with the presence the section on "Trilobites." of Taenicephalus Zone trilobites in this part of the Additional conodont faunas, possibly from the Helln Hellnmaria Member. The type section of the Hellnmaria maria Member, are known from the Chalk Knolls area, Member has not been sampled for conodonts. However, between the House and Confusion Ranges. The strati- a systematic search in the member 6.5 km to the west graphic relations there are unclear because of facies (NP section of Miller, 1969) produced no conodonts. A changes between limestones of the Notch Peak principal few long-ranging species of conodonts were found in an reference section and dolomites of the sections to the BIOSTRATIGRAPHY 11
Formation and lower part of the House Limestone, central House Range, Utah member. Renumbering begins at base of Lava Dam Member and continues into the House Limestone. Numbers of identified specimens of each species in each sample, and total A range chart is given in figure 5.]
House Notch Peak Formation Limestone
Leve Dam Member (110.9 m)
CM CM co r» en ^ enentoencM in m «- co o oo co ^ o ^ o r^ «- «- tn coooco*-co CM «- CM o ^ CM *- CM CO «- CO in «- T- CM «- «- CM «- CO CM TfCMCOCMO OCMCMCMCM
CM en oo co en CM in «- in r-» r-» in ^ to co in T co oo O en o « co CM CM en o ^ >".- * 06 do CM en * in O CM to Tt in cocoooeno «- to Tt r~ en Tt CN co CM en Tt * O O O «- «- «- «- CM co r~ r~ oo oo
r~ ^ CM r~ O CM CM * * * oo en *- co in r~ en CO CO 00 CM fx ^ «7 CM CM CM CM CM CO CO CO CO CO co co co en o o o o o o o o o 66 66666
23 _ _ --- _s ______... ~- ...... '.-- ii, 5_ - -*.
4 65 5 6 6 10 23 J 2 9 21 464 2 30 7 14 3 2 15 4 24 31 11 9 45 1 31 8 1
... 32 2 2 2 12 1 2 14 158 2 85 12 4 2 73 20 23 4 6 24 2 1
7 ......
...... 6 36 8 56 6 43 473 105 21 17 6 27 7 43 52 8 8 42 41 121 22 18
...... 2 10 8 2 10 46 30 491 55 13 28 3 5 7 34 2 9 42 10 _= ...... ,, 3 ... 3 ...... 3 2 192 30 1 735115 12 37 12 101 110 103 130 22 3 1
__ - __ _. , _ ~i.i _ -=- i.i i» -.... ,_ ft 0 , -I .
69 4 ......
1 ......
...... 30 o Z
;.. ' '!= . * ' ' "' "" 24 7
~.i -~~ ' * - - 1
4 2 ...... -j 4 130 15 58 21 12 108 2 4 25 90 1364 4 220 15 60 37 19 118 25 112 186 66 316 394 369 913 106 40 5
south and north (fig. 3). Proconodontus tenuiserratus Trempealeauan age. Therefore, strata of this age are Miller and P. posterocostatus Miller occur together present in the Notch Peak Formation in the study area, beneath faunas assigned to the P. muelleri Subzone of although the member to which these strata should be the Proconodontus Zone. These occurrences are in the assigned is unclear. These data suggest that the same homotaxial position as strata assigned to the Pro Hellnmaria Member (or its equivalents) may represent conodontus posterocostatus Subzone of the Pro continuous deposition without major hiatus. conodontus Zone in the Wilberns Formation of Texas Conodonts are present throughout the Red Tops and and in the Fort Sill Limestone of Oklahoma (Miller and Lava Dam Members of the Notch Peak Formation others, 1982). Trilobites found with this association of (tables 1-3). The conodont biostratigraphy of these conodont species in Texas and Oklahoma are of earliest strata was discussed by Miller (1978), Miller in Taylor 12 UPPER CAMBRIAN-LOWER ORDOVICIAN NOTCH PEAK FORMATION IN WESTERN UTAH
TABLE 2. Conodont distribution in the Notch Peak Formation in the Steamboat Pass [Sample numbers identify lithostratigraphic unit (RT, Red Tops Member; LD, Lava Dam Member), followed by the measured distance in feet above the base of the member Numbers
Notch Peak Formation
Member - - __ - ______Red Tops Member (40 m)
00 CD CD 00 00 r^ CD CD CD CD CM O CD CD 00 CD r- 06600 66666 0600666 66
r~inr- ooroooooro ooo inqcp^ "? ^ 6 CN 06 in 06 o> ^ CN inoo
Oino ifl o in «- ifl CM CM in o in moo O in T- «- CM CM co co ^ ^ in CD up r^ r^ op o> h-KKKK KKKKK KKKKK HK tr.tr.cr.cr.tr. cr.tr.tr.tr.tr. crcrcr.cr.cr. tree Conodonts: ... 1 -. 7 6 3 ~ 2 *-- 2 ~ 6 1 H-^ £- .- -- - , - *-i. >; - ,. - - -.-. -i - - 4 1 1 1 1 Prooneotodus galiatini (Miiller) - -- »-. . ».». . »
Cordylodus proauus Miiller, compressed element ------
,: ,,,,
_ * _ _wi _i_ i. ^ _ -^ ~«i --
and Miller (1981), and Miller and others (1982). The Red assigned to the Cambrooistodus minutus Subzone, the Tops and lower part of the Lava Dam Members are uppermost subzone of the Proconodontus Zone. assigned to the Proconodontus Zone. The upper part of The Cordylodus proavus Zone is divided into five sub- the Lava Dam Member and the lower part of the overly zones, four of which are represented in the Lava Dam ing House Limestone are assigned to the Cordylodus Member; the uppermost subzone is found in the lower proavus Zone (fig. 4). Conodonts of the Proconodontus part of the House Limestone. The Hirsutodontus hir- Zone are modest in abundance and diversity compared sutus Subzone is the lowest and thinnest subzone and with those of the C. proavus Zone. Tables 1 and 2 show is present near the middle of the Lava Dam Member. that occasional barren samples, though usually of small As discussed below, the Cambrian-Ordovician boundary size, were found in the lower zone, whereas all samples falls within this subzone (pi. 1). The overlying Fryx- in the upper zone were productive, and some samples ellodontus inornatus and Clavohamulus elongatus Sub- yielded abundant faunas. zones are recognized in both sections studied and occur The Proconodontus Zone is divided into four subzones in the upper part of the Lava Dam Member. The up (Miller and others, 1982), although the lowermost sub- permost beds of the Lava Dam Member are assigned zone is not recognized in any of the sections discussed to the lower part of the Hirsutodontus simplex Subzone; in this report. The base of the Proconodontus muelleri most of this subzone is represented in the lower part Subzone nearly corresponds with the base of the Red of the House Limestone. The highest strata of the Tops Member, which represents a major environmental Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam section are assigned to the and lithologic change from the Hellnmaria Member House Limestone, although Miller (1969) earlier as below (fig. 3, pi. 1). The lower part of the Red Tops signed these beds to member six of the Notch Peak For Member in the type section and in the Steamboat Pass- mation in his LDS (Lava Dam South) measured section, Lava Dam section is assigned to the P. muelleri Sub- located a few hundred meters south of the Lava Dam zone. The middle to upper part of the Red Tops Member segment of the Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam section is assigned to the Eoconodontus notchpeakensis Sub- reported here. The uppermost beds of the Steamboat zone. The uppermost beds of the Red Tops Member and Pass-Lava Dam section contain the diagnostic fauna of about the lower half of the Lava Dam Member are the Clavohamulus hintzei Subzone. Utahconus tenuis BIOSTRATIGRAPHY 13 segment of the Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam section, southern House Range, Utah of identified specimens of each species by sample and total number of specimens per sample are shown. A composite range chart of data from tables 2, 3, and 4 is given in plate 1 ]
Notch Peak Formation
Red Tops Member (40 m) Lava Dem Member (82.6 m)
00 oo r» in oo oo oo in m r^ 00 oo co r^r^r^Ooo ojor^or^ cn cn r^ in m co O CO O O «- CO O O O CM CM OOOO OOO«-O OOO«-O O O CO ^t CM CO CO CM ocom o CD ^- >- co in co CM o oococo^cn ^ O co en oo ^ oo co cncno CM CM *t m co r» enrv.com ^^^.(000 en-cM-*in r^ en co co oo en CM CM co co co co co co co OCM^tin r~oo«-^^ .-CMCNCMCM CM CM ^ ^ t ^> in in
o in r~ co in o co CM ^- O CM O CO inr^o o o «- «- CM CM ^ oo ^-oooococn mO'tom o in ^- in co co 6666 66666 66666 D D D D D Q 6 6 DC OC OC CCCCCCCCCC DC
1 C OO OC 1*3O 5 : - . . m 4 >-A 4 t 2 -- I*K "- 1 C *3"? *l C *t 1 C O S - :=:------.,* "7 O O Jl fl ^\ *> *3 3 fi 1Q 1fl* A *^R 23B 7 ...... , ,_, .« , __ 4 . ^^ -| 4 -.. *^i 1 7 °. . - "i1 62 3 ii. i-ii R 1 * 1 A ., 1 1 - - 1 1 A ' - : ,: i:,, ,.. 1 ;: ;: on o 1 ...... 2
1 ...... 2 ...... TO 1 2 CO -1 OQ 3 1 9 -.-. *i-i -~- .-a-- 9~ i'R
3 -1 _^ ... ,,- ...... ,-: ^. ^, -~- ^ .~.'. i- ^ w_ -__ -,- ^ =* T- -- ~, ST;-?! 7r; , -~ ^-- ^h si 1 *? 19THR1Q9R QRA RR
Miller was found in the highest sample collected from in the Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam section than in the the lower beds of the House Limestone at the principal principal reference section. This relationship suggests reference section of the Notch Peak Formation (pi. 1). that the base of the Red Tops Member may be younger Because this species is known only from the middle and in the principal reference section than in the Steamboat upper part of the Clavohamulus hintzei Subzone in Pass-Lava Dam section. Using similar reasoning regard Utah, Texas, and Oklahoma (Miller and others, 1982), ing the relative proximity of the Red Tops-Lava Dam the base of the C. hintzei Subzone probably is somewhat contact to the base of the Cambrooistodus minutus Sub- below the horizon from which this highest sample was zone, it can be inferred that this stratigraphic contact collected. may also be younger in the principal reference section The top of the Cordylodus proavus Zone has not been than in the Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam Section. recognized in either of the two sections reported here. The Proconodontus mueueri and Eoconodontus notch Samples collected 1.6 km north of the Steamboat Pass- peakensis Subzones are thicker in the Steamboat Pass- Lava Dam section [LDN (Lava Dam North) section of Lava Dam section compared with the principal Miller, 1969] indicate that only the top few feet of the reference section. This relationship is reversed for most C. proavus Zone are missing from the Steamboat Pass- of the younger biostratigraphic units in these sections Lava Dam section. The overlying strata at the LDN sec (compare columns on fig. 6), and the Cambrooistodus tion contain conodont Fauna B of Ethington and Clark minutus through Clavohamulus elongatus Subzones are (1971) (Miller, 1978; Miller and others, 1982). all thicker in the principal reference section. The greater Upon comparing conodont biostratigraphic units be thickness of the Fryxellodontus inornatus and tween the principal reference section and the Steamboat Clavohamulus elongatus Subzones in the principal Pass-Lava Dam section (fig. 6), several important con reference section may be related to relatively rapid ac clusions are evident. In the Red Tops Member, the cumulation of the algal stromatolite sediment in the up relative position of both the Proconodontus muelleri- per part of the Lava Dam Member (compare columns Eoconodontus notchpeakensis Subzone boundary and 2 and 3 on fig. 3). The base of the Hirsutodontus simplex the Eoconodontus notchpeakensis-Cambrooistodus Subzone is only slightly below the Notch Peak minutus Subzone boundary are stratigraphically higher Formation-House Limestone contact in both sections. 14 UPPER CAMBRIAN-LOWER ORDOVICIAN NOTCH PEAK FORMATION IN WESTERN UTAH
TABLE 3. Conodont distribution in the Notch Peak Formation and lower House Limestone in [Sample numbers identify lithostratigraphic unit (RT. Red Tops Member; LD, Lava Dam Member; H, House Limestone), followed by the measured distance in feet above the base and total number of specimens per sample are shown. A composite
Notch Peak Formation
Mamb r Red Tops Member (20.1 m) Lava Dam Member (77.4 m)
T-»frmincocoiO'"; oooip ; CO f^rOinco O r^iococo cs cs CDC5,-,- co co'tirir^ 06 CD* T « « T T T CN O r-CO^(Ov « CNCNJ CO
Sampla mass (kilograms) procassed- . intocsl CN IDOOCOI^ 00 cn«^oo ^cn CMOOO^CO ^-csitDOco csimin (0 "? o CM in m ID r~ oco^cn* i^ in T to omO(O in^co o h-Hh-HH HHh-h-H h-HHHh- Hh-HH-QQQQQC) QQQ Q tr tr tr cc cc tr tr tr tr cc Conodonts: Proconbdontus m.we/teff Miller -- -' 42 258 15 >4 4 58 3 2 4j ,25 5.1 4 ,27' ^58 -* - 23 14 it 8 2S \9. slvl ; 15 - ^* 86"* 5 '28 17 "85 Eocimodontus notchpeakensts (Miller), \ roufided*e1ement-- --_^- ?-~_,i- 4O 35 20 4 j? :|4 39 3 :; *^- 5 5S :; 40 ,38 05'IIS^ 411^1833 5 --35:1115! 4; 132521 1* Eoconodontus notehpecfcensis (Miller), ; 17 13 3! 13; 3s =7 4 - ^ 10 iS ;6 26 12 2 IB 6 a 17 1 .4. 12 ?9 6 1 8; 16; W Proo weotoclus r.otundatas: 23 1^ 4' 35 1 1 :~ _ _ 2* ^^, ^ n^ jn m * ^-sw^r-tttodaaaHBBBIS Proconodontus? primitiuus (Muller) ...... 4 ... 1 .- ! 3 ...... 1 ...... 3 O Cambrooi'stodtis cambricus (Miller), T ...... 11 2 1 2 Cdmferopfstodtis m/nutus (Miller); 3 . ... * . ^ *l *i :- -^^^^^^1 Procofiodofrtus, serrati/s Mitlerf-rij*---- \ 1 - U«- -i^ i"4 =-- ' i.** W*- i-J^i -i.^ Ui-i. Cordylodus. pfoavus Muller, ; \. rpurtdedtejement' ,^u.~~^~~~^- ' ' *;! -^ >-, - .... .,. ,, __ w COrdyfodussprpafus MOItef; '. ' compressedf «jerneni-~"-«*^-- ---', Mrsutodohfus hirsutus Miller-- - ~~ ' ' 3* " i X :=* a»- ^- ^ a a ^^ ^ « 9 $emtacontiodus nogamii Miller, . ; asymmetrical element-"-^- --'--- ...... ^ ^_ .-- ,4. ^ ^ .* ^ ^ H.. __ __ ^ ______^ __ ^ ,. w __ ., ,, ^- SerniacoritSdduA noganiii Milter;! ; 1 symmetrical element- *--- -« I Afpflpeostoifuii sevterensis (Miller)--; ?- ^s ^ ^ ,. ,... ^ ^ ^ «. . s __ - - .- - -w-^- - -w*, **. -.-.....% -..,. tj^.^ Hirsutodontus simplex Semiacontiodus lavadamensis (Miller), Cordy/odus intermedius Furnish, . -compressed element- : -- , ..-- -:: ;._^ .,, -,,. ,T, S . ,__ . . - ______i CtaoohatnuiUs bintzei Millet--"^ -- - *' rTr¥l?E^r£"-»":Y^ Utaficonvs tertuis, Miller, 1 ...... CdrdyftSdussdrocei Miller; ': i rotindfed i element--- -! » -? ----- : ,^,______. ^ ...______,,., _^_- ^^^ ^ ____ ; _^ ^v ^^^ ^i. wt> -: ^V^- fw._^ __^-. '-V,.-. 5^_- ^,______^, ^^._ ____ Total specimens per sample 1 50 1 1 3 46 68 1 7 11510 2 9 113 77 51 150242 6 119 32 50 87 16 24 75 23 35 13 27 71 50 34 BIOSTRATIGRAPHY 15 the Lava Dam segment of the Steamboat Pass-Lava Dam section, southern House Range, Utah of the unit. Renumbering begins at the base of the Lava Dam Member and continues into the House Limestone. Numbers of identified specimens of each species by sample range chart of data from tables 2, 3, and 4 is given in plate 1] Notch Peak Formation House Limestone Lava Dem Member (77.4 m) CD in in CD coinococo co co ^J- r^ co in co O5 CM «- CO «- CD 00 ^f CM r~ CM *- CM r^ O in O in ^ C> CD co Ocococo ^f^fin inco r- o ! » in r^ oo O - CM ^f CD r~ O) ^ 0 «- CO CD r^ O) 0 O O CO O) O) O) O) CO in - in o - oo in ^J- oo co 00 CO >- ^f ^ r~ CD CD CM CO in in CM in CD 00 O) O) O * ^ O) CM ^ «- CO ^d" ,_ CO CM CO CM CO CO CM CO CO CM CO .- .- O «- O 0 0 0 0 0 O CO <- >- - CM ^f «- co O in O O co T- CM co in r^ co OCM CD in O * O * O in CO ^f CM co «- CM csi co CO CO * in in 0 CD CD - in O in o in O CO CO «y CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM m CD r^ en O O - CM CM CO CO CM CM CM CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO co 6 Q QQQO QOQ QQ Q Q Q Q 6 Q Q Q 6 Q ° ? i i i i i i i i i i i i S3 739? 7JJ 71 4 43 196 26: 4f 23: ;63 24 - -5 !2 s; 1 1L_ 3L 1