Middle Cambrian Stratigraphy of the House, Wah Wah, and Adjacent Ranges in Western Utah

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Middle Cambrian Stratigraphy of the House, Wah Wah, and Adjacent Ranges in Western Utah Middle Cambrian Stratigraphy of the House, Wah Wah, and Adjacent Ranges in Western Utah LEHI F. HINTZE Department of Geology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602 RICHARD A. ROBISON Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045 ABSTRACT formations in the range. Since 1955, map- of the House Range is shown in Figure 2. ping has been conducted under Hintze's di- For the most part, Walcott's original for- Geologic mapping and paléontologie rection in several ranges in western Utah mational units are readily mappable entities evaluation of Middle Cambrian strata in (Stokes, 1962; Hintze, 1963). Maps of five that can be recognized in the House Range western Utah have extended the usage of 15' quadrangles (Fig. 1) have been pub- and adjacent ranges. several formations first defined in the lished (Hintze, 1974b, 1974c, 1974d, House Range by Walcott and have shown 1974e, 1974f). Field mapping of two addi- Prospect Mountain Quartzite that new units are needed outside of the tional quadrangles, Sand Pass and Fish House Range for upper Middle Cambrian Springs, was also completed in 1974. The Hague (1883, p. 254) named the Pros- strata of different facies. The following mapping has shown that all Middle Cam- pect Mountain Quartzite in the Eureka dis- usage is proposed for the House Range: brian formations in the House Range, ex- trict of central Nevada, and Walcott Lower Cambrian — Prospect Mountain cept the Marjum and Weeks Formations, (1908a, p. 12) first applied the name in the Quartzite and the lower member of the can be satisfactorily mapped in adjacent House Range, 200 km east of the type area. Pioche Formation; Middle Cambrian — ranges. In this paper we discuss Middle The name has subsequently been widely Tatow Member of the Pioche Formation, Cambrian formations mapped in the House used in western Utah and Nevada for the Millard Member and upper members of the Range, define new mappable rock units in predominantly quartzitic rocks at the base Howell Limestone, Chisholm Formation, the upper part of the Middle Cambrian of the Cambrian unit. Misch and Hazzard Dome Limestone, Whirlwind Formation, rocks of adjacent ranges, and correlate (1962, p. 304) recommended restriction of Swasey Limestone, Wheeler Shale, Marjum Middle Cambrian nomenclature in western the name to exclude various Precambrian Formation, and the lower part of the Weeks Utah and eastern Nevada. units that had been included within the Limestone. formation by others. Stewart (1970) rec- New formations defined in the Wah Wah CENTRAL HOUSE RANGE ommended that rocks formerly called Pros- Mountains include the Eye of Needle STRATIGRAPHIC TERMINOLOGY pect Mountain Quartzite in the southern Limestone (Wheeler Shale equivalent), Pier- Great Basin of California and Nevada be son Cove Formation (lower Marjum For- Stratigraphie terminology for Lower and subdivided into other units. Woodward mation equivalent), and the Wah Wah Middle Cambrian rocks in the central part (1968) and Crittenden and others (1971) Summit Formation (Weeks Limestone near followed Misch and Hazzard (1962) in equivalent). The Trippe Limestone is ex- limiting Prospect Mountain to pink, tan, tended from the Deep Creek Range into and brown quartzites of probable Early west-central Utah, and a new member, Fish Cambrian age. It is overlain by the Pioche Springs Member, is defined as a thin but Shale and underlain in Utah by the Mutual widely mappable unit. Formation and in eastern Nevada by the The House Range contains the most con- Stella Lake Quartzite and other Precam- tinuously fossiliferous trilobite sequence, brian formations. but most ranges in western Utah contain 2 Continuation of Walcott's designation of r-. -|8 the following faunas: Albertella, Glos- KEY Prospect Mountain for basal Cambrian sopleura, Ehmaniella, Ptychagnostus gib- quartzite in the House Range conforms to 3«: v7 1. Pioche, Nevada bus, Bathyuriscus fimbriatus, and Eldo- currently accepted usage. The base of the 6 2. Deep Creek Range radia. Key words: stratigraphie nomen- 3. Fish Springs Range and formation is not exposed in the House clature, trilobite faunas, carbonate rocks. t northern House Range Range; the partial thickness measured in •J5 4. Central House Range the range by various authors is shown in INTRODUCTION 5. Wah Wah Mountains - Figure 2. A section of 670 m, measured on southern House Range the west face of the House Range about 22 Walcott (1908a, 1908b) first described 6. Cricket Range km north of Marjum Canyon, is believed to the exceptionally fossiliferous Middle and 7. Drum Mountains be the maximum exposed thickness of the 8. Dugway Range Upper Cambrian strata of the House Range formation in the range. The 670+-m thick- 9. East Tintic Mountains of western Utah. Deiss (1938), Wheeler ness is within the limits of the nearest com- plete sections in adjacent ranges, as indi- (1948), and Robison (1960) recommended Figure 1. Map showing location of Cambrian changes in House Range stratigraphie strata discussed in text. Black areas are Cam- cated in Table 1. nomenclature, and Powell (1959) and brian outcrops. Dashed lines outline quadrangles A detailed description of only the upper- Hanks (1962) published the first geologic where stratigraphic units discussed in text have most 40 m of the formation in the House maps showing the distribution of Cambrian been mapped. Range has been published (Deiss, 1938, p. Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 86, p. 881-891, 5 figs., July 1975, Doc. no. 50701. 881 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/86/7/881/3433456/i0016-7606-86-7-881.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 882 HINTZE AND ROBISON 1139-1140). The 630 m of beds exposed show small-scale cross-bedding. The Pros- are intercalated. Most of Merriam's (1964) below this succession are less varied and pect Mountain Quartzite generally is in comments on lithology and bedding fea- consist of medium- to coarse-grained beds 30 to 60 cm thick; some beds are as tures of the Prospect Mountain Quartzite at pinkish-gray to light brown-gray quartzite much as 2 m thick. A few phyllitic silty Pioche apply equally well in the House and quartzitic sandstone that weather to sandstone beds less than 1 m thick, which Range. Fossils have not been found in the shades of reddish brown and commonly weather greenish gray and are micaceous, formation in the House Range. Pioche Formation (Revised) Robison Walcott Deiss Wheeler Hanks This paper 1938 1948 i960 1962 1908b Walcott (1908a, p. 11-12) named the Weeks Weeks "Weeks" Weeks Weeks Weeks Pioche Formation, designated a type local- limestone limestone limestone formation Limestone Limestone ity near Pioche, Nevada, and identified the 424 m 1,390' 591 m 1,940' 423 m 1,388' 366 m 1,200' formation as part of the Cambrian se- Marjum Marjum "Marjum" Marjum Marjum Marjum quence in the House Range. Merriam limestone limestone limestone formation Limestone Formation (1964) and A. R. Palmer (in Merriam, 415" 1,362- 1964) have most recently evaluated the 336m 1,102' 466 m 1,530' 466 m 1,530' 431m 1,413' lithologic and paleontologic characteristics Wheeler Wheeler Wheeler Wheeler Wheeler Wheeler of this formation in the Pioche district. shales shale shale shale Formation 128- Shale 4]9. 174 m 570' 107 m 350' 175 m 574' 149 m 490' The Pioche Formation in the Pioche dis- trict and the combined Pioche and Tatow Swasey Swasey Swasey <u upper Formations in the House Range show im- Swasey Swasey member limestone Limestone Limestone s-s (restricted) limestone limestone 86 m 281' 76 m 250' portant lithologic and paleontologic i i to .E Condor Whirlwind Whirlwind Whirlwind similarities. In the type area, the Pioche is member Formation Formation predominantly shale with interbedded 104 m 340' 120 m 395' formation 33 m 109' 43 m 140' sandstone and limestone, and the frequency Dome Dome Dome Dome Dome Dome of limestone units increases toward the top limestone limestone limestone limestone Limestone Limestone 108 m 355' 94m 310' 101m 330' 98 m 320' of the formation. In the House Range the Chisholm Chisholm Pioche is predominantly quartzite with in- Burnt Canyon Chisholm Howell Formation Formation terbedded siltstone and shale; the Tatow is limestone limestone formation 79 m 260' 67 m 220' predominantly quartzite with interbedded Howell shale, siltstone, and limestone, and the fre- (interval Burrows upper upper limestone o upper a> V incompletely limestone — c member c member ?f member quency of limestone units increases toward "5 & « s 112m 369' 116 m 380' described) j TÓ > ft the top of the formation. Thus, the 0 J) 0 « Millard 1 E Millard JI Millard 1 E Millard sedimentary sequence is basically the same Member Member limestone member in the two areas, but detrital rocks in the 133 m 435' 255 m 835' 97 m 317' 94 m 310' House Range section have a larger average Spence shale c Tatow Busby Tatow Tatow o Tatow grain size because they are nearer to the 6 m 20' limestone quartzite formation Limestone o Member source area. Paleontologically, the type Langston (?) E limestone o Pioche contains late Early Cambrian olenel- 50 m 165' 53 m 175' 55 m 180' 62 m '205' Li- lid faunas in the lower part of the forma- lower tion, and the uppermost beds contain an Pioche Pioche Pioche Pioche Pioche ai shale shale shale formation Shale -C member early Middle Cambrian Albertella Zone u 38 m 125' 81 m 265' 75 m 246' o 128 m 420' £ fauna with Albertella cf. A. proveedora Prospect Prospect Prospect Prospect Prospect Prospect Lochman and Mexicella sp. (A. R. Palmer, Mountain Mountain Mountain Mountain Mountain Mountain in Merriam, 1964, p. 25-27). The Pioche of sandstones quartzite quartzite quartzite Quartzite Quartzite the House Range contains a late Early 419m+ 1,375'+ 305 m+ 1,000'+ 12 m+ 40'+ 670m + 2,200'+ Cambrian Bonnia-Olenellus fauna (Robi- son and Hintze, 1972) and the upper beds Figure 2.
Recommended publications
  • New Approaches to Understanding the Mechanics of Burgess Shale-Type Deposits: from the Micron Scale to the Global Picture Robert Gaines Pomona College
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Pomona Faculty Publications and Research Pomona Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2005 New Approaches to Understanding the Mechanics of Burgess Shale-type Deposits: From the Micron Scale to the Global Picture Robert Gaines Pomona College Mary L. Droser University of California - Riverside Recommended Citation Gaines, R.R., and Droser, M.L., 2005, New Approaches to Understanding the Mechanics of Burgess Shale-type Deposits: From the Micron Scale to the Global Picture, The eS dimentary Record, v. 3, n. 2, p. 4-8. http://www.sepm.org/pages.aspx?pageid=37 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Pomona Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pomona Faculty Publications and Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Sedimentary Record platforms, at sharp shelf-slope breaks (Conway New Approaches to Morris, 1998; Rees, 1986). Classic models for the Burgess Shale have considered the deposi- tional environment to be fully anoxic, due to Understanding the the exquisite preservation of fossils, and the dark color of the mudrocks (e.g., Conway Morris, 1986). This implies that the faunas Mechanics of Burgess were transported, yet some assemblages of fos- sils, such as the well-known Ogygopsis trilobite beds in the Burgess Shale and horizons that Shale-type Deposits: contain delicate sponges, clearly occur in situ. Important questions, key to a first-order understanding the biotas in an ecological sense, have remained: Can discrete, paleoeco- From the Micron Scale to logically meaningful assemblages be resolved from within the homogeneous sediments? the Global Picture Were bottom water oxygen conditions suffi- Robert R.
    [Show full text]
  • An Appraisal of the Great Basin Middle Cambrian Trilobites Described Before 1900
    An Appraisal of the Great Basin Middle Cambrian Trilobites Described Before 1900 By ALLISON R. PALMER A SHORTER CONTRIBUTION TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 264-D Of the 2ty species described prior to I(?OO, 2/ are redescribed and 2C} refigured, and a new name is proposedfor I species UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1954 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $1 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract..__________________________________ 55 Introduction ________________________________ 55 Original and present taxonomic names of species. 57 Stratigraphic distribution of species ____________ 57 Collection localities._________________________ 58 Systematic descriptions.______________________ 59 Literature cited____________________________ 82 Index __-_-__-__---_--______________________ 85 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates 13-17 follow page 86] PLATE 13. Agnostidae and Dolichometopidae 14. Dorypygidae 15. Oryctocephalidae, Dorypygidae, Zacanthoididae, and Ptychoparioidea 16. Ptychoparioidea 17. Ptychoparioidea FIGUBE 3. Index map showing collecting localities____________________________ . Page 56 in A SHORTER CONTRIBUTION TO GENERAL GEOLOGY AN APPRAISAL OF THE GREAT BASIN MIDDLE CAMBRIAN TRILOBITES DESCRIBED BEFORE 1900 By ALLISON R. PALMER ABSTRACT the species and changes in their generic assignments All 29 species of Middle Cambrian trilobites
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 75. NUMBER 3 CAMBRIAN GEOLOGY AND PALEONTOLOGY V No. 3—CAMBRIAN AND OZARKIAN TRILOBITES (With Plates 15 to 24) BY CHARLES D. WALCOTT es'^ VorbH (Publication 2823) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION JUNE 1, 1925 Z^e. JSorb Q0affttttorc (preee BALTIMORE, MD., U. S. A, . CAMBRIAN GEOLOGY AND PALEONTOLOGY V No. 3.—CAMBRIAN AND OZARKIAN TRILOBITES By CHARLES D. WALCOTT (With Plates 15 to 24) CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 64 Description of genera and species 65 Genus Amecephalus Walcott 65 Amecephalus piochensis (Walcott), Middle Cambrian (Chis- holm) 66 Genus Anoria Walcott 67 Anorta tovtoensis (Walcott), Upper Cambrian 68 Genus Armonia Walcott 69 Armonia pelops Walcott, Upper Cambrian (Conasauga) 69 Genus Beliefontia Ulrich 69 Beliefontia collieana (Raymond) Ulrich, Canadian 72 Belief07itia nonius (Walcott), Ozarkian (Mons) y2 Genus Bowmania, new genus 73 Bonmiania americana (Walcott), Upper Cambrian y^ Subfamily Dikelocephalinae Beecher 74 Genus Briscoia Walcott _. 74 Briscoia sinclairensis Walcott, Ozarkian (Mons) 75 Genus Burnetia Walcott yj Burnetia urania (Walcott), Upper Cambrian yj Genus Bynumia Walcott 78 Bynumia eumus Walcott, Upper Cambrian (Lyell) 78 Genus Cedaria Walcott 78 Cedaria proUUca Walcott, Upper Cambrian (Conasauga) 79 Cedaria tennesseensis, species, .' new Upper Cambrian . 79 Genus Chancia Walcott 80 Chancia ebdome Walcott, Middle Cambrian 80 Chancia evax, new species, Middle Cambrian 81 Genus Corbinia Walcott 81 Corbinia horatio Walcott, Ozarkian (Mons) 81 Corbinia valida, new species, Ozarkian (Mons) 82 Genus Crusoia Walcott 82 Crusoia cebes Walcott, Middle Cambrian 82 Genus Desmetia, new genus 83 Desmetia annectans (Walcott) , Ozarkian (Goodwin) 83 Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol. 75, No. 3 61 62 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • Burgess Shale−Type Biotas Were Not Entirely Burrowed Away
    Downloaded from geology.gsapubs.org on September 25, 2015 Burgess shale−type biotas were not entirely burrowed away Robert R. Gaines1, Mary L. Droser2, Patrick J. Orr3, Daniel Garson2, Emma Hammarlund4,5, Changshi Qi6, and Donald E. Canfi eld4 1Geology Department, Pomona College, 185 E. Sixth Street, Claremont, California 91711, USA 2Department of Earth Sciences, University of California−Riverside, Riverside, California 92521, USA 3UCD School of Geological Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland 4Nordic Center for Earth Evolution, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark 5Department of Palaeozoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden 6Yunnan Key Laboratory for Palaeobiology, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China ABSTRACT tion, a deepened redox boundary in sediment pore waters (e.g., Thayer, Burgess Shale−type biotas occur globally in the Cambrian record 1983; Ziebis et al., 1996), and increased sulfate availability in the global and offer unparalleled insight into the Cambrian explosion, the initial ocean (Canfi eld and Farquhar, 2009), all of which would affect the preser- Phanerozoic radiation of the Metazoa. Deposits bearing exception- vation potential of labile tissues. ally preserved soft-bodied fossils are unusually common in Cambrian An increase in depth of bioturbation and intensity of sediment mix- strata; more than 40 are now known. The well-documented decline of ing accompanying the expansion of the infaunal habitat through the early soft-bodied preservation following the Middle Cambrian represents Paleozoic is well documented in carbonate platform settings (Ausich and the closure of a taphonomic window that was only intermittently Bottjer, 1982; Droser and Bottjer, 1988, 1989). In muddy settings, sedi- open in marine environments thereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 64, NUMBER 5 CAMBRIAN GEOLOGY AND PALEONTOLOGY III No. 5. CAMBRIAN TRILOBITES . (With Plates 45 to 67) BY CHARLES D. WALGOTT (Publication 2420) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION SEPTEMBER 29, 1916 C^e JSorb (^adimote (preee BALTIMORE, MD., U. S. A. CAMBRIAN GEOLOGY AND PALEONTOLOGY III No. 5.—CAMBRIAN TRILOBITES By CHARLES D. WALCOTT (With Plates 45 to 67) CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 307 Descriptions of genera and species 308 Family Corynexochidae Angelin 308 Corynexochus Angelin 309 Coryncxochus bornholmicnsis Gronwall (pi. 55, figs. 2, 2a-b) 313 Corynexochus brennus, new species (pi. 57, figs. 3, 30-6) 314 Corynexochus bubaris, new species (pi. 56, figs. 2, 2a-b, 3, 3a-f) 314 Corynexochus capito, new species (pi. 57, figs. 2, 2a-e) 315 Corynexochus clavatus (Walcott) (pi. 55, figs. 4, j,a-b) 316 Corynexochus dclagei Miquel (pi. 55, figs. 2, ^a) 317 Corynexochus minor (Walcott) (pi. 55, figs. 6, 6a-d) . 319 Corynexochus senectus (Billings) (pi. 55, figs. 7, 7a-c; pi. 56, figs. I, la-g) 319 Corynexochus spinulosus Angelin (pi. 55, figs, i, la-b) 323 Corynexochus stephenensis (Walcott) (pi. 55, figs. 5, Sa-c) 324 Bonnia, new subgenus 325 Corynexochus {Bonnia) busa, new species (pi. 57, fig. la; pi. 60, figs. 3, 2,a-c) 326 Corynexochus {Bonnia) fieldensis (Walcott) (pi. 57, figs. 4, 4a-b) 327 Corynexochus {Bonnia) parvulus (Billings) (pi. 57, figs. I, ib-c; pi. 64, fig. 6) 328 Family Dolichometopinse 330 Bathyuriscus Meek 330 Comparison of Bathyuriscus with other genera 2:^2 Bathyuriscus adaus, new species (pi.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving Details of the Nonbiomineralized Anatomy of Trilobites Using Computed
    Resolving Details of the Nonbiomineralized Anatomy of Trilobites Using Computed Tomographic Imaging Techniques Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jennifer Anita Peteya, B.S. Graduate Program in Earth Sciences The Ohio State University 2013 Thesis Committee: Loren E. Babcock, Advisor William I. Ausich Stig M. Bergström Copyright by Jennifer Anita Peteya 2013 Abstract Remains of two trilobite species, Elrathia kingii from the Wheeler Formation (Cambrian Series 3), Utah, and Cornuproetus cornutus from the Hamar Laghdad Formation (Middle Devonian), Alnif, Morocco, were studied using computed tomographic (CT) and microtomographic (micro-CT) imaging techniques for evidence of nonbiomineralized alimentary structures. Specimens of E. kingii showing simple digestive tracts are complete dorsal exoskeletons preserved with cone-in-cone concretions on the ventral side. Inferred stomach and intestinal structures are preserved in framboidal pyrite, likely resulting from replication by a microbial biofilm. C. cornutus is preserved in non- concretionary limestone with calcite spar lining the stomach ventral to the glabella. Neither species shows sediment or macerated sclerites of any kind in the gut, which tends to rule out the possibilities that they were sediment deposit-feeders or sclerite-ingesting durophagous carnivores. Instead, the presence of early diagenetic minerals in the guts of E. kingii and C. cornutus favors an interpretation of a carnivorous feeding strategy involving separation of skeletal parts of prey prior to ingestion. ii Dedication This manuscript is dedicated to my parents for encouraging me to go into the field of paleontology and to Lee Gray for inspiring me to continue.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Central Part of the Favant Range, Utah
    THE GEOLOGY OF THE CENTRAL PART OF THE FAVANT RANGE, UTAH DISSERTATION sented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State Univers ity By HERMAN KENNETH LAUTENSCHLAGER, B • A. The Ohio State University 1952 Approved by: Adviser / 4 44 TABES OP CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .......................... 1 LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY ..................... 2 FIELD WORK AND MAPPING ......................... 4 PREVIOUS WORK .................................... 5 PHYSICAL FEATURES ............................... 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................. 9 STRATIGRAPHY ......................................... 11 SEDIMENTARY R O C K S ........ 11 General Features <>............. 11 Cambrian System ..... 14 Tintic Quartzite 14 D e f i n i t i o n .............. 14 Distribution and 1ithology ....... 14 Stratigraphic relationships ..... 18 Age and correlation ............... 18 Ophir Formation ..... 20 D e f i n i t i o n ......................... 20 Distribution and 1ithology ..... 20 Stratigraphic relationships •••••• 20 Age and c o r r e l a t i o n ........ 21 Teutonic Limestone 21 Definition • . 21 Distribution and 1 ithology ...... 21 Stratigraphic relationships ...... 22 Age and correlation ........ 22 Dagmar Limestone ............ 23 Definition .................... 23 Distribution and 1ithology.*...... 23 Strat igraphie relat ionships ...... 24 Age and correlation ..... 24 i £ 0 9 4 2 8 Page Herkimer Limestone ...... 24 Definition ....................... 24 Distribution
    [Show full text]
  • Kimmigj CV 20210106.Pdf
    Julien Karl Franck Kimmig Curriculum vitae Earth and Mineral Sciences Museum & Art Gallery Pennsylvania State University 116 Deike Building University Park, PA, 16802 Phone: 785-766-2386 Email: [email protected] Education Ph.D. in Geology 2014 University of Saskatchewan (Canada) Thesis title: Taxonomy, taphonomy and paleocology of a new Burgess Shale-type Lagerstätte from the Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, Canada. M.Sc. in Biology 2009 Topic: Advanced Methods in Taxonomy and Biodiversity Imperial College London & Natural History Museum London (United Kingdom) B.Sc. in Geosciences 2008 Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Germany) Professional experience Collections Manager since August 2020 Earth and Mineral Sciences Museum & Art Gallery Pennsylvania State University Research Affiliate since August 2019 Division of Invertebrate Paleontology University of Kansas Collections Manager June 2016 – July 2019 Division of Invertebrate Paleontology University of Kansas Research Associate July 2015 – June 2019 University of Saskatchewan Postdoctoral Researcher October 2014 – June 2015 Supervisor: Brian Pratt University of Saskatchewan Teaching Assistant September 2011 – September 2014 University of Saskatchewan Adjunct Researcher September 2009 – May 2011 Supervisor: Alison Longbottom Kimmig | CV 1 The Natural History Museum London Museum and Research Assistant December 2007 – September 2008 Supervisor: Mike Reich Geowissenschaftliches Museum Göttingen Selected fieldwork (Total ~ 160 days) Cambrian, Utah and Idaho, 2019 10 days Spence
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Paleontology and Taphonomy of the Upper Weeks Formation (Cambrian, Upper Marjuman, Cedaria Zone) of Western Utah
    2 PALEONTOLOGY AND TAPHONOMY OF THE UPPER WEEKS FORMATION (CAMBRIAN, UPPER MARJUMAN, CEDARIA ZONE) OF WESTERN UTAH 2.1 Abstract Twelve species of trilobites belonging to as many genera, one lingulide brachiopod species, Lingulella sp., one aglaspid species, Beckwithia typa, and an undetermined lightly scleritized or soft-bodied arthropod-like animal were recovered in a quantitative collection from the upper Weeks Formation (Marjuman) in the House Range of western Utah. Previously described trilobite genera include, in order of abundance in the collection, Cedaria, Modocia, Menomonia, Genevievella, Ammagnostus, Dresbachia, Norwoodia, Tricrepicephalus, and Weeksina. Two new ptychopariid genera and species, Nephalicephalus beebei and Selenocoryphe platyura, were also recovered in the collection, as were two new ptychopariid species, Modocia weeksensis and Norwoodia bellaspina. Additionally the new ptychopariid genus and species Gerospina schachti is described from supplemental material. At least 12 other genera, mostly trilobites, are known to occur in the Weeks Formation but were not recovered in the quantitative sample. The Weeks Formation fauna is very well preserved. Fossil orientation data and overall taphonomic state indicate little out-of-habitat transport of skeletal elements; 79 percent of the specimens recovered in an in situ collection consisted of articulated molts and complete exoskeletons. Sedimentary structures in the sample interval suggest episodic siliciclastic deposition in a carbonate mud-dominated environment located
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Notch Peak Wilderness Study Area, Millard County, Utah
    Mineral Resources of the Notch Peak Wilderness Study Area, Millard County, Utah U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1749-C Chapter C Mineral Resources of the Notch Peak Wilderness Study Area, Millard County, Utah By DOUGLAS B. STOESER, DAVID L CAMPBELL, VICTOR LABSON, DAVID R. ZIMBELMAN, MELVIN H. PODWYSOCKI, DAVID W. BRICKEY, JOSEPH S. DUVAL, and KENNETH L COOK U.S. Geological Survey WILLIAM LUNDBY U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1749 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS WEST-CENTRAL UTAH DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1990 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mineral resources of the Notch Peak Wilderness Study Area, Millard County, Utah / by Douglas B. Stoeser... [et al.]. p. cm. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1749-C) (Mineral resources of wilderness study areas west-central Utah) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1749-C 1. Mines and mineral resources Utah Notch Peak Wilderness. 2. Notch Peak Wilderness (Utah) I. Stoeser, D.B. II. Series. III. Series: Mineral resources of wilderness study areas west-central Utah. QE75.B9 no. 1749-C [TN24.U8 ] 557 3 s_ dc20 [553'.09792'45] 89-600357 CIP STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lab 4: Trilobites
    Geos 223 Introductory Paleontology Spring 2006 Lab 4: Trilobites Name: Section: AIMS: This lab will introduce you to trilobites, the most abundant macrofossils in Lower Paleozoic marine sediments and the dominant marine arthropod clade until their extinction at the end of the Permian. You will see examples of most major trilobite groups and be introduced to the common morphotypes which convergently evolved in independent lineages multiple times. You will be introduced to the problems of resolving the ontogenetic development of long extinct organisms. By the end of this lab you should be familiar with basic trilobite morphology and have some understanding of trilobite paleobiology and evolution. PART A: BASIC ANATOMY OF TRILOBITES. Trilobites are an extinct group of arthropods, and so are related to familiar modern-day arthropods such as crabs, shrimps, lobsters, insects, millipedes, centipedes, horseshoe crabs, scorpions, spiders, and so on. Like all arthropods, trilobites had a hard cuticular exoskeleton for protection and support. Somewhat unusually for arthropods, the trilobite exoskeleton was mineralized with calcite for additional strength. Such mineralization gave the trilobite exoskeleton a very high chance of being preserved as a fossil (much more so than trilobite soft body parts, which soon decayed or were scavenged) once the animal died or the exoskeleton was shed off (molted) during growth. The Trilobita takes its name from the three lobes running down the length of the body: a central, somewhat vaulted axial lobe, separating two pleural lobes on either side. Although these three lobes can be very obvious when looking at the trilobite in transverse cross-section, they can be hard to distinguish in some trilobites (particularly where the body was smooth, or “effaced”).
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS PART OF VOLUME LI II CAMBRIAN GEOLOGY AND PALEONTOLOGY No. 5.—CAMBRIAN SECTIONS OF THE CORDILLERAN AREA With Ten Plates BY CHARLES D. WALCOTT No. 1812 CITY OF WASHINGTON published by the SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION December 10, 1908 CAMBRIAN GEOLOGY AND PALEONTOLOGY No. 5.—CAMBRIAN SECTIONS OF THE CORDILLERAN AREA By CHARLES D. WALCOTT (With Ten Plates) Contents Pag« Introduction 167 Correlation of sections 168 House Range section, Utah I73 Waucoba Springs section, California 185 Barrel Spring section, Nevada 188 Blacksmith Fork section, Utah 190 Dearborn River section, Montana 200 Mount Bosworth section, British Columbia 204 Bibliography 218 Index 221 Illustrations Plate 13. Map of central portion of House Range, Utah 172-173 Plate 14. West face of House Range south of Marjum Pass 173 Plate 15. Northeast face of House Range south of Marjum Pass; ridge east and southeast of Wheeler Amphitheater, House Range 178-179 Plate 16. North side of Dome Canyon, House Range 182 Plate 17. West face of House Range, belovi: Tatow Knob 184 Plate 18. Cleavage of quartzitic sandstones, Deep Spring Valley, Cali- fornia 186 Plate 19. Sherbrooke Ridge on Mount Bosworth, British Columbia 207 Plate 20. Ridge north of Castle Mountain, Alberta; profile of southeast front of Castle Mountain 209 Plate 21. Mount Stephen, British Columbia 210 Plate 22. Profile of mountains surrounding Lake Louise, Alberta 216 INTRODUCTION My first study of a great section of Paleozoic rocks of the western side of North America was that of the Grand Canyon of the Colo- rado River, Arizona. In this section the Cambrian strata extend down to the horizon of the central portion of the Middle Cambrian (Acadian) where the Cambrian rests unconformably on the pre- Cambrian formations.^ * See American Jour.
    [Show full text]