Saatchi Gallery Art Riot

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Saatchi Gallery Art Riot Saatchi Gallery 16 November – 31 December 2017 Art Riot Post-Soviet Actionism Presented by Sponsored by 1 Art RiotPost-Soviet Actionism Curated by Marat Guelman Edited by Andrey Kovalev Content 26 Introduction 132 Context 28 Marat Guelman 134 Arseny Sergeyev Introduction You’re Not in Moscow Here 32 Boris Groys, Andrey Kovalev 156 Alisa Lozhkina Russian Actionism: The New Narodniki Permanent Revolution. Contemporary Art and Politics in Ukraine 1987–2017 40 Protagonists 178 Anna Matveeva 42 Oleg Kulik St. Petersburg Votes Atypically 48 Charles Esche Animal Magic Oleg Kulik or how one person 186 Historical Perspective dealt with the collapse of everything 188 Natalia Murray 54 Ekaterina Degot Revolutionary Spectacle: Street Performances Like a Fish in Water: Oleg Kulik in the 1990s in Petrograd in 1917–1920 64 Pussy Riot 196 Andrey Kovalev 70 Helen Pyotrovsky Against All. Toward a History Pussy Riot: From Intervention to Action of Protest Art in Russia 82 Nadezhda Tolokonnikova of Pussy Riot’s 216 Alek D. Epstein prison letters to Slavoj Žižek Art Activism in the Putin Era. The Heirs of Moscow Conceptualism 96 Maria Alyokhina and Sots Art in the 21st Century Riot Days (excerpts) 228 Catalogue Plates 106 Pyotr Pavlensky 112 Sarah Wilson 244 Endnotes Pyotr Pavlensky: Images of conviction, 250 Selected Bibliography bureaucratic convulsion 254 Biographies 124 Ludmila Bredikhina Performance Instead of Politics CV, or the Pavlensky File AK Let’s start with a question about what in Russian art BG That’s not quite so obvious. I think the problem fig. 1 Oleg Kulik I Love Europe, It Does Not lies in the fact that when artists are confronted with the can be defined as Art Riot. The Peredvizhniki (Wanderers) or Love Me Back, 1996 inertia of existing institutions, in the West they start fig. 2 Oleg Kulik I Love Europe, It Does Not perhaps Russian critical realism of the nineteenth century? criticizing them and fighting against them. In Russia, of Love Me Back, 1996 fig. 3 Alexander Brener course, almost no one did that. BG Perhaps. I don’t know whether we need to go back so Boxing Champion, 1995 AK Well, in general, yes. But in a sense there was far, we’ll get to Peter the Great that way. Or even further, nothing to criticize. The first galleries that supported the Christianization of Rus.’ That was a kind of Art Riot, contemporary art in the early nineties were extreme- too — the appearance of the icon. I think that we should ly powerless. It was a long time until the White Cube opened. And there was no Museum of Modern Art, in begin, of course, with the avant- garde. And I think that which the walls had to distroyed. we should start with the discussion of the relationship BG No, actually there were lots of museums. And they had a lot of contemporary, i.e., Soviet art. But in Russia between art and artistic institutions. In Russia in the early there was no criticism of these institutions, and nobody twentieth century even the radical avant- garde move- had to fight to join those institutions. In part this was ments were relatively quickly integrated into the art sys- because in the Soviet period artists weren’t particularly interested in being part of these organisations. Instead, tem. Before the revolution, the avant- garde artworks were beginning from the seventies — Conceptualism — alter- included into all kinds of private collections, and there was native institutions appeared that would perform all the an intensive exhibition activity of the avant- garde. And functions of the official ones: publication, distribution of 1 materials, exhibitions, performances, and so on. If we look now at the Western ex- then after the revolution the avant- gardists re- perience, we will see that there are more instances of the emergence of alternative ceived substantial institutional power. If you com- institutions there. Basically, criticism of institutions in recent years has vanished, no one is interested in it anymore. But I think that Russian actionism tried to avoid insti- pare, let’s say, Russian Futurism with the Italian tutional inclusion altogether. I think actionists adopted the impulse, which without one, you can see where the Art Riot came from judgment, I call anti- intellectualism. Yes? 3 AK Not quite. The radicals who came onto the art scene in and why it went out into the streets. Marinetti the early nineties — Oleg Kulik, Anatoly Osmolovsky, and Alexan- 1 and the Italian Futurists on the whole were not der Brener were rapidly educating themselves and seeking new integrated into art institutions for a long time. languages of intellectualism. BG I did not notice that. I think instead they were trying That’s why they went out onto the street. And to run away from what Solzhenitsyn called ‘educatedism.’ To run I think that the same thing happened in Russia, away from certain tastes, from the judgement by the members of the intelligentsia, responsibility to achieve aesthetic quality. even in a more acute way, during perestroika I think that the actionist artists felt that all post-Soviet culture Russian Actionism: The New Narodniki and after it. was weak and was made up of losers and nerds. That it had only two or three years left to live. And that it would I think that at the time ability of Russian art institutions to assimilate all go under, the whole culture with its hierarchies. People went contemporary art was rather limited, which led to art trying to where they thought new places of power had appeared. News- break out beyond its borders and appeal directly to the mass media. papers, radio and television. They decided to go to the masses. Artists of the perestroika period were looking for allies in the press, 2 They identified with that new force. on television. In the post-perestroika period, Russian actionism AK I can tell you about my own experience. In 1991 I went became a landmark, going beyond the borders of institutions and overnight from a quiet academic art historian, specialist in the thereby acquiring a certain social effect and significance. Russian avant-garde, to a speedy newspaper critic. The time was AK But there was also the circle of Moscow Conceptualism, going so fast that it was impossible to sit and unhurriedly discuss which was a bureaucratic institution in itself, if we use Benjamin the next chapter in a monograph at the Institute of Art History Buchloh’s2 idea. To a certain extent the Aesthetic of Administra- with people who ceased to understand the language I was speak- tion was developed more deeply in Moscow than, say, in the Art ing. My field was art criticism of the 1910–1920s and I knew how and Language group. The Moscow Conceptualist bureaucracy much pleasure and passion Mikhail Larionov and David Burlyuk Boris Groys Boris Groys Kovalev Andrey rejected the ’new’ radicals. took in manipulating the mass media. To fill in the picture, I’ll 32 33 add that Italian Futurism in fact did not appear in a gallery or of the Russian Pavilion in Venice. They asked me: ‘Starting from what attendance art magazine but from its manifesto published in the newspaper figures would I consider the exhibition a success?’ I said that this criterion did not Le Figaro. By the way, an interesting detail. Our chief fighter with exist for me. They said, ‘Oh, yes, we forgot, you don’t like people, you despise rotten and prostituted intelligentsia, Alexander Brener, is the them.’ The problem here is that the greater part of the intelligentsia switched to son of a doctor and schoolteacher from Alma- Ata, thecapital servicing mass taste faster than Brener and Osmolovsky of Kazakhstan. Provincial members of the intelligentsia made up did. Brener and Osmolovsky thought that they would 3 the backbone of Russian culture. come to the masses and awaken them, but in reality BG Marinetti himself had that anti- intelligentsia and anti- the Russian mass media combined Soviet tradition with intellectual syndrome. He was an extremely refined man, hard to marketing, which are fundamentally the same things. It be more so. But it was not about his origins, but his beliefs. A kind is a system for mastering the taste of a great number of of new ‘narodnichestvo’ has appeared, if you like. The narodni- people. At the technological level, manipulation stayed ki wanted to kiss the fruitful Russian soil, in the good sense of the same, the ideology changed, but the manipulation the word, they dreamt that it would bear powerful trees, oaks. system remained the same. There is nothing done can The actionists did the same. But when they moved closer to the do about it. You can scream as much as you want on the massses, they rather quickly discovered, as did the narodniki of square, but that is the voice crying out in the wilderness, 1860s and 1870s, that the masses were not interested in them. which is actually quite pleasant. I think the re-creation Then they started crawling into very dark corners, organizing their of the figure Voice Crying Out in the Wilderness is the most institutions with varied success. Anatoly Osmolovsky carried out powerful side of Russian actionism of that period. 4 the institutionalization most consistently. In one form or another AK But that is exactly Alexander Brener calling Boris Yeltsin to come for a box- it was done by all the artists of that circle. ing duel on Lobnoe Mesto in the Red Square. AK All except Alexander Brener, but his persistent and ruth- BG It’s also Kulik’s man- dog, because one day he realized: ‘The only thing I have less struggle against art institutions in the end turned him into an is my body.
Recommended publications
  • James Rowson Phd Thesis Politics and Putinism a Critical Examination
    Politics and Putinism: A Critical Examination of New Russian Drama James Rowson A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Royal Holloway, University of London Department of Drama, Theatre & Dance September 2017 1 Declaration of Authorship I James Rowson hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________ Date: ________________________ 2 Abstract This thesis will contextualise and critically explore how New Drama (Novaya Drama) has been shaped by and adapted to the political, social, and cultural landscape under Putinism (from 2000). It draws on close analysis of a variety of plays written by a burgeoning collection of playwrights from across Russia, examining how this provocative and political artistic movement has emerged as one of the most vehement critics of the Putin regime. This study argues that the manifold New Drama repertoire addresses key facets of Putinism by performing suppressed and marginalised voices in public arenas. It contends that New Drama has challenged the established, normative discourses of Putinism presented in the Russian media and by Putin himself, and demonstrates how these productions have situated themselves in the context of the nascent opposition movement in Russia. By doing so, this thesis will offer a fresh perspective on how New Drama’s precarious engagement with Putinism provokes political debate in contemporary Russia, and challenges audience members to consider their own role in Putin’s autocracy. The first chapter surveys the theatrical and political landscape in Russia at the turn of the millennium, focusing on the political and historical contexts of New Drama in Russian theatre and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • HRWF Human Rights in the World Newsletter Bulgaria Table Of
    Table of Contents • EU votes for diplomats to boycott China Winter Olympics over rights abuses • CCP: 100th Anniversary of the party who killed 50 million • The CCP at 100: What next for human rights in EU-China relations? • Missing Tibetan monk was sentenced, sent to prison, family says • China occupies sacred land in Bhutan, threatens India • 900,000 Uyghur children: the saddest victims of genocide • EU suspends efforts to ratify controversial investment deal with China • Sanctions expose EU-China split • Recalling 10 March 1959 and origins of the CCP colonization in Tibet • Tibet: Repression increases before Tibetan Uprising Day • Uyghur Group Defends Detainee Database After Xinjiang Officials Allege ‘Fake Archive’ • Will the EU-China investment agreement survive Parliament’s scrutiny? • Experts demand suspension of EU-China Investment Deal • Sweden is about to deport activist to China—Torture and prison be damned • EU-CHINA: Advocacy for the Uyghur issue • Who are the Uyghurs? Canadian scholars give profound insights • Huawei enables China’s grave human rights violations • It's 'Captive Nations Week' — here's why we should care • EU-China relations under the German presidency: is this “Europe’s moment”? • If EU wants rule of law in China, it must help 'dissident' lawyers • Happening in Europe, too • U.N. experts call call for decisive measures to protect fundamental freedoms in China • EU-China Summit: Europe can, and should hold China to account • China is the world’s greatest threat to religious freedom and other basic human rights
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Power in Putin's Russia
    RUSSIA Art and Power in Putin’s Russia BY SASHA PEVAK The separation between art and power in Russia’s recent history has never been clear-cut. Soon after the fall of the USSR, contemporary art, namely actionism in the 90s, openly criticized society and entered the political sphere. This trend continued after Vladimir Putin’s election in 2000. Russian identity politics in the 2000s were based on four pillars: state nationalism with the Putin’s “power vertical”, the vision of Russia as a nation-state, Orthodox religion, and the myth of the Unique Russian Path, reinforced by the notion of “sovereign democracy” and the idea of the omnipresence of a fifth column inside the country 1. The will to consolidate society around these values provoked, according to political scientist Lena Jonson, tensions between the State and culture, especially as far as religious issues were concerned. These issues were the cause of the trials against the exhibitions “Attention! Religion” (2003) and “Forbidden Art – 2006” (2007), shown in Moscow at the Andrei Sakharov Museum and Public Centre. The latter staged temporary events and activities based on the defence of Human Rights. For part of the national opinion, the Centre symbolized democracy in Russia, whereas for others it represented an antipatriotic element, all the more so because it was financed by foreign foundations. In 2014, the Department of Justice catalogued it as a “foreign agent,” on the pretext that it carried out political actions with American subsidies 2. In 2003, the exhibition “Caution, Religion!”, organized by Aroutioun Zouloumian, was vandalized by religious activists several days after the opening 3.
    [Show full text]
  • “World Press Freedom Day” Mr. Chairperson, on The
    The OSCE Secretariat bears no responsibility for the content of this document PC.DEL/452/19 and circulates it without altering its content. The distribution by OSCE 3 May 2019 Conference Services of this document is without prejudice to OSCE decisions, as set out in documents agreed by OSCE participating States. ENGLISH only Statement on “World Press Freedom Day” As delivered by Ambassador Ihor Prokopchuk, Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the International Organizations in Vienna, to the 1226th meeting of the Permanent Council, 2 May 2019 Mr. Chairperson, On the occasion of “World Press Freedom Day” which we will mark tomorrow on 3 May 2019 the Delegation of Ukraine wishes to underline the critical importance of free media for the development of a democratic, pluralistic and prosperous society. Ukraine joins other OSCE participating States in reaffirming the pledge to promote and protect freedom of expression and media freedom in the OSCE area in line with our agreed principles and commitments. We strongly and unequivocally condemn all attacks against journalists and maintain a firm view that journalists’ safety must be guaranteed at all times. Having taken important legislative measures to strengthen the safety of journalists and increase responsibility for obstruction of their work, the Ukrainian authorities give utmost attention to the thorough and impartial investigation of all cases of violence and intimidation of members of the media. Unfortunately, a number of cases remain unresolved. On a number of occasions we updated the OSCE Permanent Council about specific and important steps undertaken in the area of strengthening the environment for free media.
    [Show full text]
  • Pussy Riot: Art Or Hooliganism? Changing Society Through Means of Participation
    Pussy Riot: Art or Hooliganism? Changing Society through Means of Participation Camilla Patricia Reuter Ritgerð til BA-prófs í listfræði Háskóli Íslands Hugvísindasvið Pussy Riot: Art or Hooliganism? Changing Society through Means of Participation Camilla Patricia Reuter Lokaverkefni til BA-gráðu í listfræði Leiðsögukennari: Hlynur Helgason Íslensku- og menningadeild Menntavísindasvið Háskóla Íslands Maí 2015 Ritgerð þessi er lokaverkefni til BA- gráðu í listfræði og er óheimilt að afrita ritgerðina á nokkurn hátt nema með leyfi rétthafa. © Camilla Patricia Reuter 2015 Prentun: Bóksala Menntavísindasviðs Reykjavík, Ísland 2015 Preface In my studies of art history the connection between the past and present has always intrigued me. As a former history major, the interest in historical developments comes hardly as a surprise. This is why I felt that the subject of my essay should concentrate on a recent phenomenon in art with a rich history supporting it. My personal interest in Russian art history eventually narrowed my topics down to Pussy Riot and Voina, which both provide a provocative subject matter. Having spent a semester in St. Petersburg studying the nation’s art history one discovers a palpable connection between politics and art. From Ilya Repin’s masterpieces to the Russian avant-garde and the Moscow Conceptualists, Russian art history is provided with a multitude of oppositional art. The artistic desire to rebel lies in the heart of creativity and antagonism is necessary for the process of development. I wish to thank you my advisor and professor Hlynur Helgason for accepting to guide me in my writing process. Without the theoretical input from my advisor this bachelor’s thesis could not have been written.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending the Right to Freedom of Artistic Expression
    Defending the Right to Freedom of Artistic Expression K. Bennoune, Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights Art-at-risk conference, Zürich, Switzerland 28 February 2020 Good evening. It is a real pleasure to be here with you at this important gathering with artists and defenders of artistic freedom from Switzerland and from all over the world. I’d like to thank the organizers for this very special convening, and also for inviting me. I realize that I stand between you and your Friday evening at the end of many rich discussions so I thank you sincerely for your attention. This evening, I am going to talk about defending the right to artistic freedom within the broader context of defending cultural rights as a whole, drawing from my report on Cultural Rights Defenders to be presented to the UN Human Rights Council on Tuesday March 3.1 I will share some of the ideas in this report. Let me express my sincere gratitude to those in this room from different regions who made contributions to the report which greatly enriched it. The main point I wish to make this evening is that if the international community values artistic freedom, it must find ways to better support and enable the work of those who defend that human right. It must also respect and ensure their human rights. I start with a personal anecdote. Last Sunday I was very stressed about getting ready for this trip. So I decided that I needed a culture cure. I spent the afternoon in the San Francisco area with cultural rights defenders.
    [Show full text]
  • Attacks Against Journalists and Media Freedom in Europe
    Provisional version Doc. … 8 December 2016 Attacks against journalists and media freedom in Europe Report1 Committee on Culture, Science, Education and Media Rapporteur: Mr Volodymyr ARIEV, Ukraine, Group of the European People’s Party Summary The Council of Europe “Platform to promote the protection of journalism and safety of journalists” became operational in April 2015 and lists a high number of cases which have given rise to alerts on serious threats to media freedom in Europe. The Platform alerts and their governmental responses should be used for in- depth analyses of serious cases of attacks on journalists and media freedom, especially where the severity and frequency of such attacks indicate systemic problems in member States. For instance, 16 journalists died violently in member States since January 2015 and some serious concerns expressed already in Resolution 2035 (2015) have to be reiterated again. Despite the difficulties and serious challenges Turkey faces today, writers, journalists and cartoonists should not be tried in detention and emergency decrees should be reviewed as far as they order the arrest of writers and media staff as well as the public seizure of media companies and their assets. Russian authorities should respect freedom of expression and information through the media also in areas which are de facto controlled by them outside the territory of Russia in violation of Resolution A/RES/68/262 of the United Nations General Assembly. 1 Reference to committee: Doc. 13780, Reference 4136 of 22 June 2015. F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex | [email protected] | Tel: + 33 3 88 41 2000 | Fax: +33 3 88 41 2733 Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18
    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia 2012-2013: Attack on Freedom / 3 Introduction
    RUSSIA 2012-2013 : Attack on Freedom Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 5: No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, February 2014 / N°625a Cover photo: Demonstration in front of the State Duma (Russian Parliament) in Moscow on 18 July 2013, after the conviction of Alexei Navalny. © AFP PHOTO / Ivan Novikov 2 / Titre du rapport – FIDH Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 1. Authoritarian Methods to Suppress Rights and Freedoms -------------------------------- 6 2. Repressive Laws ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8 2.1. Restrictions on Freedom
    [Show full text]
  • Art Catch · Russian Curators Abroad 09-03-2021 18:56
    Art Catch · Russian Curators Abroad 09-03-2021 18:56 ARTICLES russian curators abroad The review of the most renowned Russian contemporary art curators on international scene. Text: Sergey Guskov Translation: Basil Ballhatchet Posted on: January 26, 2021 EKATERINA DEGOT, PHOTO © MATHIAS VOELZKE / ART REVIEW A successful 2020 To a certain extent 2020 was the year when Russian curators started to be noted. According to the magazine ArtReview, Ekaterina Degot is th https://artcatch.art/articles/russian-curators-abroad/ Pagina 1 van 24 Art Catch · Russian Curators Abroad 09-03-2021 18:56 ranked 54th in the annual rating of the 100 most inLuential people in art. Technically she was recognised for the most recent Steirischer Herbst festival which was adapted for a TV channel (September-October 2020), but in actual fact this was recognition for her overall achievements. This is the Trst time that a Russian curator has appeared on this list. Previously Russia was only represented through the patroness and founder of Garage Daria Zhukova: the Trst time in 2008 together with her husband back then oligarch Roman Abramovich, and subsequently in 2011- 2016 on her own. In addition, Katerina Chuchalina was one of the curators of the travelling European biennale Manifesta, which was held on this occasion in Marseille (August-November 2020). It was a miracle that the event held for the 13th time actually went ahead: it opened two and half months earlier than had been planned, albeit subject to health and hygiene restrictions. Judging by press feedback, however, the Manifesta was a success. The list of Russian curators in demand in the west is quite short.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrey Tolokonnikov
    Andrey Tolokonnikov Kirill, the Patriarch and Putin should be on the Pussy Riot list Andrey Tolokonnikov is the father of Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, one of the members of the punk outfit Pussy Riot, sentenced to two years of labour camp following their protest in the Church of Christ the Saviour in Moscow. After the Pussy Riot trial, Andrey Tolokonnikov wrote a book about his daughter. Interview conducted in August 2013 Elena Servettaz: Sergei Magnitsky was found guilty posthumously. Such liti- gation is forbidden by law in the Russian Federation unless it is at the request of relatives (for the purposes of rehabilitation). Sergei’s relatives did not make any such request. On the contrary, Natalia Nikolaevana, Sergei’s mother, wrote to lawyers explicitly asking them not to participate in a posthumous trial of her son. How do you react to such a trial in modern Russia? Andrey Tolokonnikov: As one five-year-old girl (Andrey is speaking about Héra, the daughter of Nadezhda - editor’s note) said to me: “Medieval”. In certain courts during the inquisition, the dead person was placed in a chair for the “trial”. How strange then that they did not exhume Magnitsky and torture his remains! There is no political stability in Russia nowadays. In Russia, since time im- memorial, the war of Good vs. Evil has been waged. Magnitsky’s death speaks far more loudly than Magnitsky ever could do himself. Exposure to financial fraud has become the norm in Russia. Elena Servettaz: Recently, there have been other “show trials” in Russia. After Pussy Riot, Alexei Navalny has now also been found guilty.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS INFORMATION 2019 Inhalt
    PRESS INFORMATION 2019 Inhalt 3 Introducton 4 General informationen 5 For Media 6 Team 7 Sponsors + Partners 8 Quotes 9 Special Presentations ZONE1 Explorations Focus: NSK State in Time Video: Falling Awake DUO 13 Prizes 14 Dialogues Talks | Next? Media + Partner Talks Culture 5.0 Conference 18 Family Programm and Guided Tours 19 Partners in the city 22 Exhibitor list 2019 Introduction Dear Ladies and Gentelmen of the press, On a long weekend in September, from 26 to 29 September 2019, Vienna is the shining center of the contemporary art scene. With its consistent focus on art and galleries from Central and Eastern Europe, viennacontemporary has firmly established itself as a highlight of the national and interna- tional art scene. The most prestigious art fair of the region offers a platform to 110 galleries from 26 countries, which present exciting discoveries as well as established contemporary art positions. Since the beginning of this year, the German-Polish art expert Johanna Chromik is the artistic director of the fair. She carries on the successful format while bringing a fresh feel to the fair and setting new, future-oriented trends. International and Austrian galleries interact more than ever, strengthening the network that makes the art-marketplace of Vienna so interesting. Buying art, experiencing culture, understanding more, discovering new things - these are the key- words for your visit to viennacontemporary. An expert team of art educators guides you through the gallery landscape covering various topics. A series of carefully curated exhibitions within the fair allows its guests to focus on different topics. For those of you, who are still not satisfied by the vast offer at the fair, we recommend the frame- work program of the cooperating partners.
    [Show full text]