North Fourmile Watershed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

North Fourmile Watershed WATERSHED ANALYSIS REPORT FOR THE NORTH FOURMILE WATERSHED KLAMATH RANGER DISTRICT WINEMA NATIONAL FOREST KLAMATH COUNTY, OREGON 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION......................................................1 II CHARACTERIZATION OF THE WATERSHED.................................1 A. Social and Economic Resources................................1 1. Location and Land Management.............................1 2. Heritage Resources.......................................4 3. Timber...................................................7 4. Roads....................................................9 5. Agriculture..............................................9 6. Recreation..............................................10 B.River Basin Context.........................................10 C.Physical Features...........................................11 1. Erosional Processes and Soils...........................11 2. Hydrology...............................................12 3. Stream Channels.........................................14 4. Water Quality...........................................14 D. 1. Vegetation..............................................17 2. Plants..................................................19 3. Aquatic Species.........................................21 4. Terrestrial Species.....................................23 IIIISSUES AND KEY QUESTIONS.........................................25 IVDISCUSSION OF ISSUES.............................................28 A.Vegetation Changes..........................................28 B.Sensitive Plants............................................36 C.Upland Wildlife Habitat.....................................40 D.Erosion/Soils...............................................46 E.Flow Changes................................................50 F.Channel Condition...........................................54 G.Fish Habitat................................................57 H.Native Fish Species.........................................60 I.Riparian Reserve Management.................................62 J.Historic Railroad Sites.....................................72 V.MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS LISTED................................75 VI.REFERENCES.......................................................80 APPENDIX A. PEOPLE CONSULTED....................................... A1 APPENDIX B. SENSITIVE PLANT OCCURRENCE..............................B1 APPENDIX C. ADDITIONAL WILDLIFE INFORMATION.........................C1 APPENDIX D. WIN INVENTORY PROJECTS..................................D1 WATERSHED ANALYSIS REPORT FOR THE NORTH FOURMILE WATERSHED I. INTRODUCTION This report documents an analysis of the North Fourmile Watershed. The watershed includes the drainages of Fourmile Creek, Lost Creek, and Horse Creek, which are divided into three subwatersheds: Fourmile Creek; Fourmile Creek above Seldom Creek; and Lost Creek. The Lake of the Woods Basin/Seldom Creek and Varney Creek drainages, which flow intermittently into Fourmile Creek from the south, are not included here and will be addressed in a separate report. The purpose of the analysis is to develop a scientifically-based understanding of the processes and interactions occurring within the watershed and the effects of management practices. The analysis focuses on issues concerning values and uses specific to the area. These issues form the basis for discussions of the interactions between land-use activities, the physical environment, and its biological components. A detailed outline can be found in "Ecosystem Analysis at the Watershed Scale", Version 2.2. The analysis was conducted by a four- member core team consisting of a fish biologist, soil specialist/hydrologist, wildlife biologist, and botanist/ecologist. Many others were consulted during the process (See Appendix A). The analysis was limited by the use of existing information. Specific objectives of the analysis are to: 1.Provide information and recommendations for management and project planning. 2.Define riparian reserves necessary for maintaining hydrologic, geologic, and ecologic processes. 3.Guide restoration and monitoring work in the watershed area. II. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE WATERSHED A. Social and Economic Resources 1. Location and Land Management The 36,159-acre watershed extends from the crest of the southern Oregon Cascades and top of Pelican Butte to the marshlands near Pelican Bay of Upper Klamath Lake (Figure 1). The Fourmile Creek subwatershed drains the southern slope of Pelican Butte and includes the lower portion of Fourmile Creek, from its mouth to the confluence with Seldom Creek. The Lost Creek subwatershed extends between the crest of the Cascades on the west and the top of Pelican Butte on the east. It includes Lost Creek and Cold Springs Creek. The Fourmile Creek above Seldom Creek subwatershed lies west of the other two, and includes Fourmile Lake, the upper section of Fourmile Creek, and Horse Creek. The eastern slope of Mt. McLoughlin is included in the Fourmile Creek above Seldom Creek subwatershed. See Figure 2. 3 System (NFS) lands, the majority being on the Klamath Ranger District of the Winema National Forest. The eastern flank of Mt. McLoughlin (845 acres) lies within the boundaries of the Rogue River National 4 1 5 2 6 Forest. Tracts of privately owned land are located in the lower portions of the watershed, including the Fourmile Flat and Rocky Point areas. Private land totals 1,051 acres and includes residences, small acreages, agricultural lands, and forested lands owned by the Weyerhaeuser Company. Approximately 12,417 acres (34%) of the watershed lie within the boundaries of Sky Lakes Wilderness. Late successional reserve (LSR) R0227 is located along the southern slope of Pelican Butte and continues west and south through the watershed to the Lake of the Woods Basin. Approximately 11,018 acres of LSR are present in the watershed. Figure 3 shows the management areas within LSR. Matrix lands comprise all areas outside of LSR and wilderness. Matrix management areas include scenic, timber, riparian, developed recreation, bald eagle habitat, and semi-primitive recreation located on Pelican Butte (Figure 4). Little timber harvest or road construction has occurred in the semi-primitive recreation management area. 2. Heritage Resources Past inventory surveys have documented 45 discrete archeological sites relating to the area's history of settlement and use by both Indian and Euroamerican peoples. Additionally, some 30 miles of railroad grade is extant within the watershed, representing industrial scale exploitation of the area's timber resources. Identified themes of human occupation of the area include American Indian occupations, transportation development, and industrial scale timber exploitation, which is discussed under Issue J. a. Indian Peoples The Klamath occupied a large territory comprised of the upper Klamath Basin, as well as areas to the north and east. Divided into about five distinct groups, the Klamath are estimated to have numbered in the several thousand by the time Euroamerican exploration and settlement of the region began. While the largest populations of Klamath lay along the east and south shores of Upper Klamath Lake, a small population, the gu'mbotkni, was concentrated in the resource-rich marsh/lake shore areas near present day Rocky Point (the Klamath name gu'mbot is a geographic reference to Pelican Bay). The gu'mbotkni, like other Klamath peoples, subsisted largely on lake and marsh resources, primarily fish and water lily (wokas) seeds found in Pelican Bay, Crystal and Recreation Creeks, and elsewhere on Upper Klamath Lake. Fish thrived in these waters, particularly salmonids and suckers. Although these resources may not have been concentrated within the North Fourmile Watershed, the hydrologic systems of the watershed are likely to have affected fish stocks in Pelican Bay. Plants such as camas (Camassia quamash), epos (Perideridia sp.), and Yarrow (Achillea millefolium), found in moist/wet meadow habitats around Fourmile Creek were used to supplement the staple resources. Lists of plant resources utilized by the Klamath can be found in Spier, 1930, and Coville, 1897. A large portion of the watershed is made up of the south and west slopes of Pelican Butte. This mountain is of undetermined significance to the Klamath. As a landscape feature, Pelican Butte is visible from many surrounding areas. There are several vision quest sites, which suggest that the area was used traditionally in the past for religious purposes. One vision quest site is 7 3 8 4 9 located near the summit. Sites near the base may be places where preparatory `cleansing' took place before ascending to the top. Other sites found within the watershed typically are lithic scatters, which are locations of dispersed stone tools and debris from their manufacture. While the specific function of these sites is unclear, they probably represent locations of temporary camps, or sites where various food resources were harvested and processed. At this time, the condition of prehistoric sites (lithic scatters, vision quest sites, etc.) appears to be relatively stable and not at risk. b. Euroamerican Peoples and Transportation Routes While much of southwest and southcentral Oregon was being explored by Euroamericans in the early part of the 19th century, little documentation exists of ventures into the area between Upper Klamath Lake and the Cascade Summit (including the North Fourmile Watershed) until the 1860's. The earliest well documented push
Recommended publications
  • Hunting Deer in California
    HUNTING DEER IN CALIFORNIA We hope this guide will help deer hunters by encouraging a greater understanding of the various subspecies of mule deer found in California and explaining effective hunting techniques for various situations and conditions encountered throughout the state during general and special deer seasons. Second Edition August 2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME L. Ryan Broddrick, Director WILDLIFE PROGRAMS BRANCH David S. Zezulak, Ph.D., Chief Written by John Higley Technical Advisors: Don Koch; Eric Loft, Ph.D.; Terry M. Mansfield; Kenneth Mayer; Sonke Mastrup; Russell C. Mohr; David O. Smith; Thomas B. Stone Graphic Design and Layout: Lorna Bernard and Dana Lis Cover Photo: Steve Guill Funded by the Deer Herd Management Plan Implementation Program TABLE OF CON T EN T S INTRODUCT I ON ................................................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1: THE DEER OF CAL I FORN I A .........................................................................................................7 Columbian black-tailed deer ....................................................................................................................8 California mule deer ................................................................................................................................8 Rocky Mountain mule deer .....................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge Trails
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service This blue goose, designed Rocky Flats by J.N. “Ding” Darling, is the symbol of the National Wildlife Refuge System. National Wildlife Refuge Trails Welcome Exploring the Refuge Accessibility Information Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge We invite you to enjoy the sights and Equal opportunity to participate in and offers expansive views of the Front Range sounds of the Refuge. To help protect benefit from programs and activities of the Rocky Mountains and rolling prairie wildlife and habitats, please keep the of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is grasslands, woodlands, and wetlands. This following rules in mind: available to all individuals regardless of 5,237-acre Refuge has been managed by ■ Visitor access is limited to designated physical or mental ability. Dial 711 for a the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service since trails and roads as shown on the map. All free connection to and from people with 2007 to restore and preserve the native other areas are closed to visitor access. hearing and speech disabilities. For more prairie ecosystems, provide habitat for information or to address accessibility ■ Observe all posted signs and regulations. migratory and resident wildlife, conserve needs, please contact Rocky Mountain and protect habitat for Preble’s meadow ■ Park only in the designated areas Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge staff at jumping mouse, and provide research and shown on the map. 303 / 289 0930 or the U.S. Department of education opportunities. ■ Assistance dogs are welcome and must the Interior, Office of Equal Opportunity, be under leash control at all times.
    [Show full text]
  • The Implications of Space and Mobility in James Cameronâ•Žs Titanic
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2013 The Implications of Space and Mobility in James Cameron's Titanic Cindy Stewart Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION THE IMPLICATIONS OF SPACE AND MOBILITY IN JAMES CAMERON’S TITANIC By CINDY STEWART A Thesis submitted to the School of Communication in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2013 Cindy Maria Stewart defended this thesis on October 14, 2013 The members of the supervisory committee were: Davis Houck Professor Directing Thesis Jennifer Proffitt Committee Member Michael Neal Committee Member Stephen McDowell Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the thesis has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii To my mom, Maria: thank you so much for all your sacrifice so that I could earn a good education, and for guiding me to make the best choices possible in my life. Also, thank you for discussing the themes of Titanic with me. To my dad, Jim, and brother, Jose: thank you for ultimately acknowledging the relevance of the issues addressed in a “chick flick” like Titanic. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my thesis director, Professor Davis Houck, for his dedication to helping me think critically about my favorite movie, Titanic. I greatly appreciate the time he has taken to discuss my thesis topic with me, and continuously prompt me with questions and ideas that furthered the improvement of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • App. 1 UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS for the SECOND
    App. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JAN- UARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOV- ERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY OR- DER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DA- TABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 14th day of November, two thousand eighteen. PRESENT: ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Chief Judge, AMALYA L. KEARSE, DENNY CHIN, Circuit Judges. App. 2 EDWARD KRAMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANTONIO VITTI, No. 17-2467-cv STEPHEN STAUROVSKY, Defendants-Appellees, PETER FEARON, Defendant. For Plaintiff-Appellant: WILLIAM S. PALMIERI, Law Offices of William S. Palmieri, LLC, New Haven, CT. For Defendants-Appellees: JAMES N. TALLBERG (Patrick D. Allen, on the brief ), Karsten & Tallberg, LLC, Rocky Hill, CT. Appeal from a judgment of the United States Dis- trict Court for the District of Connecticut (Underhill, J.). UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DE- CREED that the judgment of the district court is AF- FIRMED. Plaintiff-appellant Edward Kramer appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Underhill, J.) entered in favor of defendants-appellees Antonio Vitti and Stephen App.
    [Show full text]
  • Films Winning 4 Or More Awards Without Winning Best Picture
    FILMS WINNING 4 OR MORE AWARDS WITHOUT WINNING BEST PICTURE Best Picture winner indicated by brackets Highlighted film titles were not nominated in the Best Picture category [Updated thru 88th Awards (2/16)] 8 AWARDS Cabaret, Allied Artists, 1972. [The Godfather] 7 AWARDS Gravity, Warner Bros., 2013. [12 Years a Slave] 6 AWARDS A Place in the Sun, Paramount, 1951. [An American in Paris] Star Wars, 20th Century-Fox, 1977 (plus 1 Special Achievement Award). [Annie Hall] Mad Max: Fury Road, Warner Bros., 2015 [Spotlight] 5 AWARDS Wilson, 20th Century-Fox, 1944. [Going My Way] The Bad and the Beautiful, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, 1952. [The Greatest Show on Earth] The King and I, 20th Century-Fox, 1956. [Around the World in 80 Days] Mary Poppins, Buena Vista Distribution Company, 1964. [My Fair Lady] Doctor Zhivago, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, 1965. [The Sound of Music] Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Warner Bros., 1966. [A Man for All Seasons] Saving Private Ryan, DreamWorks, 1998. [Shakespeare in Love] The Aviator, Miramax, Initial Entertainment Group and Warner Bros., 2004. [Million Dollar Baby] Hugo, Paramount, 2011. [The Artist] 4 AWARDS The Informer, RKO Radio, 1935. [Mutiny on the Bounty] Anthony Adverse, Warner Bros., 1936. [The Great Ziegfeld] The Song of Bernadette, 20th Century-Fox, 1943. [Casablanca] The Heiress, Paramount, 1949. [All the King’s Men] A Streetcar Named Desire, Warner Bros., 1951. [An American in Paris] High Noon, United Artists, 1952. [The Greatest Show on Earth] Sayonara, Warner Bros., 1957. [The Bridge on the River Kwai] Spartacus, Universal-International, 1960. [The Apartment] Cleopatra, 20th Century-Fox, 1963.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Butte Creek Watershed Assessment
    Little Butte Creek Watershed Assessment Little Butte Creek Watershed Council August 2003 Abstract The Little Butte Creek Watershed Assessment has been prepared for the Little Butte Creek Watershed Council with funding from the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB). The Assessment was prepared using the guidelines set forth in the Governor’s Watershed Enhancement Board’s 1999 Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual. The purpose of this document is to assess the current conditions and trends of human caused and ecologic processes within the Little Butte Creek Watershed and compare them with historic conditions. Many important ecological processes within the watershed have been degraded over the last 150 years of human activity. This Assessment details those locations and processes that are in need of restoration as well as those that are operating as a healthy system. The Assessment was conducted primarily at the 5th field watershed level, that of the entire Little Butte Creek Watershed. List and describe field watershed levels below. Where possible, the analyses was refined to the smaller 6th field watershed level, thirteen of which exist within the Little Butte Creek Watershed. The assessment also notes gaps in data and lists recommendations for future research and data collection. It is intended that this document, and the Little Butte Creek Watershed Action Plan be used as guides for future research and watershed protection and enhancement over the next decade. The document was developed using existing data. No new data was collected for this project. Where data was lacking, it was detailed for future work and study. Acknowledgements This assessment was compiled and written by Steve Mason.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky (1976) Movie Script by Sylvester Stallone
    Rocky (1976) movie script by Sylvester Stallone. Final draft, 1/7/76. More info about this movie on IMDb.com INT. BLUE DOOR FIGHT CLUB - NIGHT SUPERIMPOSE OVER ACTION... "NOVEMBER 12, 1975 - PHILADELPHIA" ... The club itself resembles a large unemptied trash-can. The boxing ring is extra small to insure constant battle. The lights overhead have barely enough wattage to see who is fighting. In the ring are two heavyweights, one white the other black. The white fighter is ROCKY BALBOA. He is thirty years old. His face is scarred and thick around the nose... His black hair shines and hangs in his eyes. Rocky fights in a plodding, machine-like style. The BLACK FIGHTER dances and bangs combinations into Rocky's face with great accuracy. But the punches do not even cause Rocky to blink... He grins at his opponent and keeps grinding ahead. The people at ringside sit on folding chairs and clamor for blood... They lean out of their seats and heckle the fighters. In the thick smoke they resemble spectres. Everyone is hustling bets... The action is even heavier in the balcony. A housewife yells for somebody to cover a two dollar bet. The BELL RINGS and the fighters return to their corner... Somebody heaves a beer can into the ring. The Black Fighter spits something red in a bucket and sneers across the ring at Rocky. BLACK FIGHTER (to cornerman) ... I'm gonna bust his head wide open! In Rocky's corner he is being assisted by a shriveled, balding CORNERMAN, who is an employee of the club..
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Flow of the Upper Klamath River
    Natural Flow of the Upper Klamath River U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation November 2005 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Cover photo by J. Rasmussen— McCornac Point Marsh Natural Flow of the Upper Klamath River—Phase I Natural inflow to, natural losses from, and natural outfall of Upper Klamath Lake to the Link River and the Klamath River at Keno prepared by Technical Service Center Water Resources Services Thomas Perry, Hydrologist Amy Lieb, Hydrologist Alan Harrison, Environmental Engineer Mark Spears, P.E., Hydraulic Engineer Ty Mull, Agricultural Engineer Concrete Dams and Waterways Elisabeth Cohen, P.E., Hydraulic Engineer Klamath Basin Area Office John Rasmussen, Hydrologist Jon Hicks, Water Conservation Specialist TSC Project Management Del Holz, Manager Joe Lyons, Assistant Manager prepared for U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Klamath Basin Area Office Klamath Falls, Oregon November 2005 Base map and study area. Preface This study was undertaken to estimate the effects of agricultural development on natural flows in the Upper Klamath River Basin. A large body of data was reviewed and analyzed to obtain the results included in this assessment of the natural hydrology of the Basin. Within this report, the term natural represents typical flows without agricultural development in the basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Streamflow Records in Rogue River Basin, Oregon
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 187 \ EVALUATION OF STREAMFLOW RECORDS IN ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREGON B!y Donald Rkhaideon UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 187 EVALUATION OF STREAMFLOW RECORDS IN ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OREGON By Donald Richardson Washington, D. C., 1952 Free on application to the Geological Surrey, Washington 25, D. C. ' CONTENTS Page Page Abstract................................. 1 Syllabus of gaging-stations records--Con. Introduction............................. 1 Gaging-station records-Continued Purpose and Scope...................... 1 Rogue River Continued Acknowledgments........................ 1 Little Butte Creek at Lake Creek... 25 Physical features- of the basin........... 2 Little Butte Creek above Eagle Utilization of water in the basin........ 2 Point............................ 25 Water resources data for Rogue River basin 5 Little Butte Creek near Eagle Streamflow records ..................... 5 Point............................ 25 Storage reservoirs..................... 6 Little Butte Creek below Eagle Adequacy of data....................... 6 Point............................ 26 Syllabus of gaging-station records....... 13 Emigrant Creek (head of Bear Creek) Explanation of data .................... 13 near Ashland..................... 27 Gaging-station records................. 13 Emigrant Creek below Walker Creek, Rogue River above Bybee Creek........ 13 near Ashland..................... 28 Rogue River above
    [Show full text]
  • North and South Forks Little Butte Creek Key Watershed Water Quality
    Water Quality Restoration Plan Southern Oregon Coastal Basin North and South Forks Little Butte Creek Key Watershed Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Medford District Ashland Resource Area Butte Falls Resource Area Lakeview District Klamath Falls Resource Area May 2006 North and South Forks Little Butte Creek Key Watershed at a Glance Hydrologic Unit Code Number (Little 1710030708 Butte Creek) WQRP Area/Ownership Total: 125,778 acres BLM: 26,959 acres (21%) U. S. Forest Service: 59,875 acres (48%) Bureau of Reclamation: 5 acres (<.01%) Private: 38,939 acres (31%) 303(d) Stream Miles Assessed Total: 65.4 miles BLM Ownership: 15.7 miles 303(d) Listed Parameters Temperature, Sedimentation, E. Coli, pH Key Resources and Uses Salmonids, domestic, aesthetic Known Human Activities Agriculture, forestry, roads, recreation, rural residential development Natural Factors Geology: volcanic Soils: various series and complexes Statement of Purpose This water quality restoration plan is prepared to meet the requirements of Section 303(d) of the 1972 Federal Clean Water Act. Table of Contents Page Element 1 Condition Assessment and Problem Description 1 A. Introduction 1 B. Watershed Characterization 4 C.Temperature 16 D. Sedimentation 23 E.E.Coli 31 F.pH 34 Element 2 Goals and Objectives 36 Element 3 Proposed Management Measures 39 Element 4 Time Line for Implementation 40 Element 5 Responsible Parties 41 Element 6 Reasonable Assurance of Implementation 41 Element 7 Monitoring and Evaluation 42 Element 8 Public Involvement 44 Element 9 Costs and Funding 44 Element 10 Citation to Legal Authorities 45 References 46 List of Preparers 48 List of Tables Page 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2015 Highline
    The Highline A tri-annual newsletter of the Back County Horsemen of Oregon Winter 2015 An Update on the Effort to Keep Oregon and Washington Trails Open Submitted by: Dan Applebaker At the BCHA Annual Meeting in Wilderness Act, September 3, 1964, Sec. Sacramento during the last weekend 2(b) and Sec. 4(b). How can the mandate in April of this year, the Backcountry to provide for the use and enjoyment of the Horsemen of Oregon (BCHO) were given American people, and to leave wilderness an opportunity to present an effort they, unimpaired for future use as wilderness, be along with the Backcountry Horsemen possible if historic access trails are closed of Washington, have been working on due to lack of maintenance? How can the for some time to keep wilderness trails public purposes for which wilderness are open and available for use in their states. devoted be continued when access is not Although considerably more complicated, available on thousands of miles of trails put simply it is asking the Forest Service into thousands of acres wilderness? to use their own procedures to reevaluate the methods and primitive equipment We ask if continuing to require the use they have historically used to maintain of traditional primitive equipment thereby wilderness trails they can no longer expanding the trail maintenance defi cit maintain by such means. and denying access to thousands of acres of wilderness is more important What’s Inside In other words, our two state BCH than complying with the intent of the Act. organizations are asking the Forest The Wilderness Act does allow the use Cover Story (Continued) 3 Service not to let these trails fall into such of motorized tools for trail maintenance if President’s Letter 4 disrepair because of their insistence on that use satisfi es the test of, “as necessary using traditional primitive tools which have to meet minimum requirements for the Thank Goodness Hoppy Wasn’t Here 7 become too slow, ineffi cient and expensive administration of the area for the purposes to maintain them in a usable condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Hclassification
    Form No 10-306 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS _______________TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS_____________ DNAME HISTORIC Jacksonville-to-Ft. Klamath Military Wagon Road AND/OR COMMON Rancheria Road (or Trail), Fourmile Lake Road, Butte Falls-to-Pelican Bay Road, Mt. Pitt Road, Col. Drew's Road. LOCATION See Attached Continuation Sheet STREET & NUMBER a linear feature —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Butte Falls X VICINITY OF 2/4 STATE CODE COUNTY CODE w. Oregon 41 Jackson/Klamath 029/035 HCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT 2?:PUBLIC —OCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _ BUILDING(S) —PRIVATE X-UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE 2LSITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS X-YES: RESTRICTED .^GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL -^TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY —OTHER: Q AGENCY REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: (If applicable) U.S. Forest Service, Region Six (Recreation Section) Bureau of Land Management STREET & NUMBER 319 SW Pine St. P. 0. Box 2965 CITY. TOWN STATE Portland VICINITY OF Oregon LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDs.ETc. Lands and Minerals Section, Rogue River National Forest STREET & NUMBER P. 0. Box 550 CITY, TOWN STATE Medford Oregon REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE 1 through 3, see attached continuation sheet DATE 1. Nov. 1977 2. March 1973 3. Oct. 1977 JSFEDERAL —STATE _COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR Continuation Sheet SURVEY RECORDS See Attached CITY, TOWN STATE 1.
    [Show full text]