Mervyn De Silva and the Lankan Condition
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sri Lanka and Eelam: 90 Published Letters [1981-2000]
1 Sri Lanka and Eelam: 90 Published Letters [1981-2000] Sachi Sri Kantha - 66 Letters [and his critics – 24 Letters] 2 Contents [Numbered letters with asterisks were authored by Sachi Sri Kantha; Authors of other letters are indicated, following the titles.] 1. Observations on the Madurai Tamil Conference* – Lanka Guardian 4 2. Polls in the US Press* – Lanka Guardian 5 3. New name in Science* – Lanka Guardian 6 4. Reply to Shan [N.Sanmugadasan]* – Lanka Guardian 7 5. Thugs, You Say?* – Asiaweek 7 6. That Word Again – Jayantha Herath – Asiaweek 8 7. The Jaffna View* - Asiaweek 9 8. The Sri Lanka Troubles – Jayantha Herath – Asiaweek 9 9. The Sri Lanka Troubles* – Asiaweek 10 10. The War in Sri Lanka* - Asiaweek 10 11. The Veddah Revisited* - Asiaweek 11 12. By Invitation Only* – Far Eastern Economic Review 11 13. Reparation* - Asiaweek 11 14. Reparation – William Corr – Asiaweek 12 15. The Big Payback* - Asiaweek 12 16. Out for the Count* - Asiaweek 13 17. Sri Lanka and Iraq* - Asiaweek 14 18. Forgotten Innocents – Edward Gunawardene – Asiaweek 14 19. Ethnic Identity of Tamils* – Lanka Guardian 14 20. Two Groups of Tamils – Izeth Hussain – Lanka Guardian 16 21. Determination of Ethnicity by biomedical evidence* – Lanka Guardian17 22. Ethnic Groups – Izeth Hussain – Lanka Guardian 18 23. Defining Ethnicity: A Reply* – Lanka Guardian 21 24. Plain Words – Izeth Hussain – Lanka Guardian 22 25. Separatism – M.P. de Silva – Lanka Guardian 22 26. Distinct in some senses – Izeth Hussain – Lanka Guardian 22 27. Sri Lanka’s Tamils – Anonymous – Asiaweek 23 28. Sri Lanka’s Tamils* - Asiaweek 24 29. Sri Lanka’s Tamils – Anonymous – Asiaweek 24 30. -
Sri Lanka Strategic Assessment 2016
SRI LANKA STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT 2016 Authored by Verité Research, in collaboration with The Asia Foundation Sri Lanka Strategic Assessment 2016 March 2016 THE ASIA FOUNDatION (TAF) is a nonprofit international development organisation committed to improving lives across a dynamic and developing Asia. Informed by six decades of experience and deep local expertise, our programmes address critical issues affecting Asia in the 21st century—governance and law, economic development, women’s empowerment, environment, and regional cooperation. In addition, our Books for Asia and professional exchange programmes are among the ways we encourage Asia’s continued development as a peaceful, just, and thriving region of the world. Headquartered in San Francisco, The Asia Foundation works through a network of offices in 18 Asian countries and in Washington, DC. Working with public and private partners, the Foundation receives funding from a diverse group of bilateral and multilateral development agencies, foundations, corporations, and individuals. In 2015, we provided more than $95 million in direct programme support and distributed textbooks and other educational materials valued at over $10 million. VERITÉ RESEARCH aims to be a leader in the provision of information and analysis for negotiations and policy making in Asia, while also promoting dialogue and education for social development in the region. The firm contributes actively to research and dialogue in the areas of economics, sociology, politics, law, and media, and provides services in data collection, information verification, strategy development, and decision analysis. Acknowledgements This Assessment was authored by a research team comprising Dr Nishan de Mel, Gehan Gunatilleke, Janeen Fernando, Dr Malathy Knight, Subhashini Abeysinghe, Rehana Mohammed, Shamara Wettimuny and Hasna Munas from Verité Research. -
TERRORISM in SOUTH ASIA Research Paper N° 3
Centre Français de Recherche sur le Renseignement TERRORISM IN SOUTH ASIA Research Paper n° 3 - November 2005 17 Square Edouard VII, 75009 Paris - France Tél. : 33 1 53 43 92 44 Fax : 33 1 53 43 92 92 www.cf2r.org Association régie par la loi du 1er juillet 1901 SIRET n° 453 441 602 000 19 Centre Français de Recherche sur le Renseignement TERRORISM IN SOUTH ASIA Général Alain Lamballe Research Paper n° 3 - November 2005 ___________________________________________________________________________ 17 Square Edouard VII, 75009 Paris - France Tél. : 33 1 53 43 92 44 Fax : 33 1 53 43 92 92 www.cf2r.org Association régie par la loi du 1er juillet 1901 SIRET n° 453 441 602 000 19 1 PRÉSENTATION DU CF2R Fondé en 2000, le CENTRE FRANÇAIS DE RECHERCHE SUR LE RENSEIGNEMENT (CF2R) est un think-tank non gouvernemental, indépendant, régi par loi de 1901, spécialisée sur l’étude de l'ensemble des domaines historiques, techniques et politiques du renseignement. Autour de ces thèmes, le CF2R développe : - des activités de réflexion et de recherche, réservées à ses seuls membres actifs (dîners- débats, groupes de travail) ; - des actions de sensibilisation à l'intention de la presse, des parlementaires, des universités et des décideurs économiques ; - des publications, pour l'information du grand public, - des études et des formations, à la demande de clients divers. Dans cette perspective, le CF2R est structuré en plusieurs commissions : • Histoire du renseignement, • Fonctionnement du renseignement, • Renseignement technique et technologies du renseignement, • Opérations spéciales, • Actions psychologiques et influence, • Privatisation des activités de sécurité et mercenariat, • Intelligence économique et diplomatie d'entreprise, • Drogue, criminalité et mafias, • Terrorisme et islamisme. -
Chapter Iii Foreign Policy Making in Sri Lanka
1 CHAPTER III FOREIGN POLICY MAKING IN SRI LANKA: INSTITUTIONS AND PROCESSES I The foreign policy of a state is formulated and managed generally by the persons who are responsible for it. Other individuals and social groups who are knowledgeable on international relations or whose socio-economic interests are related to the external relations of the state try to influence the foreign policy making process. The citizens are not directly involved in the making of foreign policy. They are not concerned with foreign policy except when situations in the international arena affect their civil liberties or their religious, linguistic and cultural sentiments. However, such occasions of mass involvement in foreign policy affairs is seldom. Only in extreme situations do the mass get involved in foreign policy making process.1 Even on these occasions it is the socio-political elites who mobilize the masses. Usually the foreign policy makers take note of popular sentiments and interests in the making and execution of foreign policy and thereby foreclose mass involvement. The term foreign policy elite is used to describe the official as well as non-official individuals and groups involved in the making and implementation of foreign policy. While the official elites formulate the foreign policy, the non-official elites influence the foreign policy making process. Thus, foreign policy of a state emerges from the interactions among its foreign policy elites. Therefore, it is essential for acquiring a better understanding of the foreign policy making of state to know not only the formal organization of foreign policy making and implementation but also to identify the individuals and groups who play important roles in the making of foreign policy and analyze the loci of their interests and activities. -
Download) Methodology)
Our mission To improve the lives of the people of the emerging Asia-Pacific by facilitating their use of ICTs and related infrastructures; by catalyzing the reform of laws, policies and regulations to enable those uses through the conduct of policy-relevant research, training and advocacy with emphasis on building in-situ expertise CEO’s message Contents CEO’s message 03 LIRNEasia and networks 11 About LIRNEasia 23 Review of activities 43 Research 45 Capacity-building 56 Advocacy and dissemination 57 Financial statements 77 © LIRNEasia Published in 2010 by LIRNEasiaL I R N E a s i a | Annual Report 2009-10 2 12 Balcombe Place Colombo 8, Sri Lanka CEO’s message CEO’s message L I R N E a s i a | Annual Report 2009-10 3 CEO’s message about L I R N E a s i a | Annual Report 2009-10 4 CEO’s message We should be happy and content. We are be. Not a simple conclusion, but still an are, for the most part, mobile, are caused happy but not content. achievement. This is cause for happiness. by multiple actors. No single actor can take full credit. But reading, for example, Happiness It is not just a story we tell ourselves. We the recent World Telecommunication/ have taken it out to all sorts of audiences, ICT Development Report 2010 of the We just finished the 2008-10 research some friendly and others not so friendly. International Telecommunication Union, we cycle where we had set ourselves a When putting new ideas into circulation, it is cannot but take satisfaction.