DOCSLIB.ORG

List of Wetlands of International Importance 31/12/95

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
List of Wetlands of International Importance 31/12/95 The List of Wetlands of International Importance 22 August 2012 The Ramsar List was established in response to Article 2.1 of the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971), which reads: Each Contracting Party shall designate suitable wetlands within its territory for inclusion in a List of Wetlands of International Importance, hereinafter referred to as “the List” which is maintained by the bureau [secretariat of the Convention] established under Article 8. Wetlands included in the List acquire a new status at the national level and are recognized by the international community as being of significant value not only for the country, or the countries, in which they are located, but for humanity as a whole. The Convention establishes that “wetlands should be selected for the List on account of their international significance in terms of ecology, botany, zoology, limnology or hydrology.” Over the years, the Conference of the Contracting Parties has adopted more specific criteria interpreting the Convention text, as well as an Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands and a Classification system of wetland type. All issues pertaining to the Ramsar List were encapsulated in Resolution VII.11 adopted by the Conference of the Parties in May 1999 and entitled Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance.1 Everything in the Strategic Framework is founded upon this “Vision for the Ramsar List”: To develop and maintain an international network of wetlands which are important for the conservation of global biological diversity and for sustaining human life through the ecological and hydrological functions they perform. Full data submitted by the Parties for each of their Ramsar Sites are entered in the Ramsar Sites Database, which is maintained by Wetlands International under contract with the Convention. The basic Ramsar List is also available, with one-paragraph descriptions of each site, as the Annotated Ramsar List in hard copy form and on the Convention‟s Web site (www.ramsar.org/anno-list)). Abbreviations: MR: Sites included in the Montreux Record, “a record of Ramsar Sites where changes in ecological character have occurred, are occurring or are likely to occur” maintained by the Secretariat in consultation with the Contracting Party concerned (Recommendation 4.8). www.ramsar.org/montreux-record TRS: Transboundary Ramsar Site, where “an ecologically coherent wetland extends across national borders and the Ramsar site authorities on both or all sides of the border have formally agreed to collaborate in its management, and have notified the Secretariat of this intent” (Ramsar Manual). www.ramsar.org/trs. 1 The Strategic Framework is available in print form as No. 17 in the Ramsar Handbooks series on the Ramsar Web site at www.ramsar.org/pdf/lib/hbk4-17.pdf Ramsar List Page 2 La Liste des zones humides d’importance internationale La Liste de Ramsar a été établie conformément à l‟article 2.1 de la Convention sur les zones humides (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) qui stipule: Chaque Partie contractante devra désigner les zones humides appropriées de son territoire à inclure dans la Liste des zones humides d’importance internationale, appelée ci-après, «la Liste», et qui est tenue par le Bureau institué en vertu de l’article 8. Les zones humides qui sont inscrites sur la Liste acquièrent un nouveau statut au niveau national et, aux yeux de la communauté internationale, prennent une importance non seulement pour le pays ou les pays où elles se trouvent mais aussi pour toute l‟humanité. La Convention précise: «Le choix des zones humides à inscrire sur la Liste devrait être fondé sur leur importance internationale au point de vue écologique, botanique, zoologique, limnologique ou hydrologique ». Au fil des années, la Conférence des Parties contractantes a adopté des critères plus spécifiques pour interpréter le texte de la Convention, de même qu‟une Fiche descriptive des zones humides Ramsar et un Système de classification des types de zones humides. La Résolution VII.7, adoptée par la Conférence des Parties en mai 1999, et intitulée Cadre stratégique et lignes directrices pour orienter l’évolution de la Liste des zones humides d’importance internationale2 contient tout ce qui concerne la Liste de Ramsar. Le Cadre stratégique repose intégralement sur cette «Vision pour la Liste de Ramsar»: Élaborer et maintenir un réseau international de zones humides importantes, en raison des fonctions écologiques et hydrologiques qu’elles remplissent, pour la conservation de la diversité biologique mondiale et la pérennité de la vie humaine. Toutes les données fournies par les Parties sur chaque site Ramsar sont consignées dans la Banque de données Ramsar tenue par Wetlands International sous contrat de la Convention. Abréviations: MR: Sites inclus dans le Registre de Montreux, «un registre des Sites Ramsar dont les caractéristiques écologiques ont connu, connaissent ou sont susceptibles de connaître des modifications», tenu par le Secrétariat en consultation avec la Partie contractante concernée (Recommandation 4.8). www.ramsar.org/registre-montreux TRS: Sites Ramsar transfrontières: “des zones humides écologiquement cohérentes s‟étendent de part et d‟autre de frontières et les autorités responsables de ces Sites, des deux côtés de la frontière, décident, dans le cadre d‟accords officiels, de collaborer à la gestion et notifient le Secrétariat de leur intention” (Manuel de Ramsar). www.ramsar.org/trs 2 Le Cadre stratégique est disponible sous forme imprimée dans le No 17 des Manuels Ramsar et peut être téléchargé sur le site Web de Ramsar: www.ramsar.org/pdf/lib/hbk4-17fr.pdf. Ramsar List Page 3 La Lista de Humedales de Importancia Internacional La Lista de Ramsar se estableció con arreglo al párrafo 1 del artículo 2 de la Convención sobre los Humedales (Ramsar, Irán, 1971), que dice lo siguiente: Cada Parte Contratante designará humedales idóneos de su territorio para ser incluidos en la Lista de Humedales de Importancia Internacional, en adelante llamada “la Lista”, que mantiene la Oficina [secretaría de la Convención] establecida en virtud del Artículo 8. Los humedales incluidos en la Lista pasan a formar parte de una nueva categoría en el plano nacional y la comunidad internacional reconoce que tienen un valor significativo no sólo para el o los países donde se encuentran, sino también para la toda la humanidad. La Convención estipula que “la selección de los humedales que se incluyan en la Lista deberá basarse en su importancia internacional en términos ecológicos, botánicos, zoológicos, limnológicos o hidrológicos.” Con los años la Conferencia de las Partes Contratantes ha adoptado criterios más precisos para interpretar el texto de la Convención, así como una Ficha Informativa de los Humedales de Ramsar y un Sistema de Clasificación de tipos de humedales. Todos las cuestiones relacionadas con la Lista de Ramsar se encapsularon en la Resolución VII.11 adoptada por la Conferencia de las Partes en mayo de 1999, titulada Marco estratégico y lineamientos para el desarrollo de la Lista de Humedales de Importancia Internacional.3 El contenido íntegro del Marco Estratégico descansa en la siguiente “Visión para la Lista de Ramsar”: Crear y mantener una red internacional de humedales que revistan importancia para la diversidad biológica mundial y para el sustento de la vida humana debido a las funciones ecológicas e hidrológicas que desempeñan. Todos los datos facilitados por las Partes respecto de cada uno de sus Sitios Ramsar se introducen en la Base de Datos sobre los Sitios Ramsar, administrada por Wetlands International en virtud de un contrato con la Convención. Abreviaciones: MR: sitios incluidos en el Registro de Montreux, “un Registro de los Sitios Ramsar en los que se hubieran producido, se estuvieran produciendo o pudieran producirse modificaciones en las condiciones ecológicas” que lleva la Secretaría en consulta con cada una de las Partes Contratantes interesadas (Recomendación 4.8). www.ramsar.org/registro-montreux TRS: Sitios Ramsar transfronterizos: “un humedal ecológicamente cohesivo se extiende a través de fronteras nacionales y las autoridades del sitio Ramsar de ambos o todos los lados de la frontera han acordado oficialmente colaborar en su manejo, y han notificado a la Secretaría tal decisión” (Manual de Ramsar). www.ramsar.org/trs 3 El Marco Estratégico está disponible en versión impresa como No. 17 de la serie Manuales Ramsar y en la página Web de Ramsar en: www.ramsar.org/pdf/lib/hbk4-17sp.pdf. Ramsar List Page 4 Status of the Convention Number of Contracting Parties / Nombre de Parties contractantes / Número de Partes Contratantes: 162 Number of Sites designated / Nombre de Sites désignés / Número de Sitios designados: 2,048 Total area / Superficie totale / Superficie total: 193,602,396 hectares Ramsar List Page 5 site date of designation region, province, state area coordinates site date de désignation région, province, état superficie coordonnées sitios fecha de designación región, provincia, estado área coordenadas _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ALBANIA / ALBANIE (3 Ramsar Sites, 83,062 hectares) * Butrint 28/03/03 Vlora 13,500 ha 39°50‟N 020°00‟E * Karavasta Lagoon 29/11/95 Lushnja 20,000 ha 41º00‟N 019º30‟E * Lake Shkodra and River Buna 02/02/06 Malesia e Madhe, Shkodra 49,562 ha 42°03‟N 019°29‟E ALGERIA / ALGÉRIE / ARGELIA (50 Ramsar Sites, 2,991,013 hectares) * Aulnaie de Aïn Khiar
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2019–0040; FXRS12610900000-190-FF09R20000]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/10/2019 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2019-18054, and on govinfo.gov Billing Code 4333-15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Parts 26, 32, 36, and 71 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2019–0040; FXRS12610900000-190-FF09R20000] RIN 1018-BD79 2019–2020 Station-Specific Hunting and Sport Fishing Regulations AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), open seven National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs) that are currently closed to hunting and sport fishing. In addition, we expand hunting and sport fishing at 70 other NWRs, and add pertinent station-specific regulations for other NWRs that pertain to migratory game bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, and sport fishing for the 2019–2020 season. We also formally open 15 units of the National Fish Hatchery System to hunting and sport fishing. We also add pertinent station- specific regulations that pertain to migratory game bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, and sport fishing at these 15 National Fish Hatcheries (NFHs) for the 2019–2020 season. This rule includes global administrative updates to every NWR entry in our refuge- specific regulations and the reorganization of general public use regulations. We remove approximately 2,100 regulations that will have no impact on the administration of hunting and sport fishing within the National Wildlife Refuge System. We also simplify over 2,900 refuge- specific regulations to comply with a Presidential mandate to adhere to plain language standards 1 and to reduce the regulatory burden on the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Cultural Inventories of Wetlands in Arab States Including Ramsar Sites and World Heritage Properties
    Rapid cultural inventories of wetlands in Arab states including Ramsar Sites and World Heritage Properties Building greater understanding of cultural values and practices as a contribution to conservation success Tarek Abulhawa – Lead Author Tricia Cummings – Research and Data Analysis Supported by: May 2017 Acknowledgements The report team expresses their utmost appreciation to Ms. Mariam Ali from the Ramsar Secretariat and Ms. Haifaa Abdulhalim from the Tabe’a Programme (IUCN’s programme in partnership with ARC-WH) for their guidance and support on the preparation of this regional assessment. Special gratitude is extended to all the national focal points from the target countries and sites as well as international experts and colleagues from the Ramsar and IUCN networks for their valuable contributions and reviews of assignment reports drafts. Finally, the team wants to take the opportunity to thank all the peoples of the wetlands in the Arab states for their long established commitment to the protection of their wetlands through their cultural values, traditional knowledge and sustainable practices for the benefit of future generations. Cover: Traditional felucca fishing boat, Tunisia. DGF Tunisa Contents Executive summary . 4 Introduction . 9 Methodology . 13 Assessment Results . 21 Algeria . 23 La Vallée d’Iherir . 24 Oasis de Tamantit et Sid Ahmed Timmi. 27 Réserve Intégrale du Lac Tonga . 32 Egypt . 35 Lake Bardawil . 36 Lake Burullus . 41 Wadi El Rayan Protected Area . 44 Iraq . 49 Central Marshes . 52 Hammar Marshes . 55 Hawizeh Marshes . 58 Mauritania . 63 Lac Gabou et le réseau hydrographique du Plateau du Tagant . 64 Parc National du Banc d’Arguin . 67 Parc National du Diawling .
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Submarine
    Foreign submarine A serious political conflict between Sweden and the Soviet Union, in which a Lund physicist played an active role. Foreign submarine 426 427 Foreign submarine in Swedish archipelago On the evening of 28 October 1981 the front pages of the newspapers were filled with a surprising piece of news. A Soviet submarine on a secret mission had run aground on a rock in Blekinge archipelago. It was well inside a restricted military area and not far from Karlskrona naval base. Heightened state of alert Swedish military units from the navy and coastal rangers, among others, were assembled in the area over the following days. A large area was cordoned off. Helicopters and fighter aircraft patrolled the airspace and Swedish submarines were stationed underwater along the limit of territorial waters. The naval ship Thule was stationed as a barrier in the strait out towards open water. Foreign submarine 428 429 In all probability armed In an extra edition of the television news pro- gramme Aktuellt, a week after the grounding, Prime Minister Torbjörn Fälldin revealed that the submarine: ”… in all probability …” was armed with nuclear weapons. Political activity in Sweden and internationally was great. This was world news! Dagens Nyheter, 6 November 1981. The day after the Prime Minister’s revelation that there were nuclear weapons on board the submarine U137. On a secret mission In order to investigate whether the submarine was armed with nuclear weapons, measurements of the ionising radiation needed to be carried out. Reader Ragnar Hellborg from the Department of Physics in Lund was one of those who performed the measure- ments on behalf of the Swedish Defence Research Agency: It was around dinnertime on All Hallows’ Eve when the phone rang.
    [Show full text]
  • Conospermum Hookeri Hookeri (Tasmanian Smokebush)
    Listing Statement for Conospermum hookeri (tasmanian smokebush) Conospermum hookeri tasmanian smokebush FAMILY: Proteaceae T A S M A N I A N T H R E A T E N E D S P E C I E S L I S T I N G S T A T E M E N T GROUP: Dicotyledon Photos: Naomi Lawrence Scientific name: Conospermum hookeri (Meisn.) E.M.Benn., Fl. Australia 16: 485 (1995) (Meisn.) Common name: tasmanian smokebush Name history: previously known in Tasmania as Conospermum taxifolium. Group: vascular plant, dicotyledon, family Proteaceae Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995: vulnerable Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Vulnerable Distribution: Biogeographic origin: endemic to Tasmania Tasmanian NRM regions: North, South Tasmanian IBRA Bioregions (V6): South East, Northern Midlands, Ben Lomond, Flinders Figure 1. Distribution of Conospermum hookeri Plate 1. Conospermum hookeri in flower. showing IBRA (V6) bioregions 1 Threatened Species Section – Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Listing Statement for Conospermum hookeri (tasmanian smokebush) Conospermum hookeri may be limited by low seed SUMMARY: Conospermum hookeri (tasmanian production rates. Other species of Conospermum smokebush) is a small shrub in the Proteaceae are known to have low reproductive outputs. family. It is endemic to Tasmania, occurring Approximately 50% of flowers of Conospermum along the East Coast from Bruny Island to species form fruit though only a small Cape Barren Island in 10 locations, two proportion of these produce viable seed presumed locally extinct and another of (Morrison et al. 1994). uncertain status. The number of subpopulations is estimated to be 40, with five Conospermum hookeri makes a highly significant presumed locally extinct or of uncertain status.
    [Show full text]
  • BR List 2012B.Xls.Xlsx
    World Network of Biosphere Reserves 610 Biosphere reserves in 117 countries Approval Approbation CODE COUNTRY/PAYS/PAIS Aprobacion Countries BR ALG ALGERIA/ALGERIE/ARGELIA 1 1 Tassili N'Ajjer 1986 1 2 El Kala 1990 1 3 Djurdura 1997 1 4 Chréa 2002 1 5 Taza 2004 1 6 Gouraya 2004 1 ARG ARGENTINA/ARGENTINE/ARGENTINE 1 1 San Guillermo 1980 1 2 Laguna Blanca 1982 1 3 Costero Del Sur 1984 1 4 Ñacuñan 1986 1 5 Pozuelos 1990 1 6 Yaboty 1995 1 7 Mar Chiquito 1996 1 8 Delta des Paraná 2000 1 9 Riacho Teuquito 2000 1 10 Laguna Oca del Rio Paraguay 2001 1 11 Las Yungas 2002 1 12 Andino Norpatagonica 2007 1 13 Pereyra Iraola 2007 1 AUL AUSTRALIA/AUSTRALIE/AUSTRALIA 1 1 Croajingalong 1977 1 2 Kosciuszko 1977 1 Southwest 1977 Macquarie Island 1977 3 Prince Regent River 1977 1 4 Unnamed 1977 1 5 Uluru (Ayers Rock-Mount Olga) 1977 1 6 Yathong 1977 1 7 Fitzgerald River 1978 1 8 Hattah-Kulkyne NP & Murray-Kulkyne 1981 1 9 Wilson's Promontory 1981 1 10 Riverland (ex Bookmark) 1977 1 11 Mornington Peninsula and Western Port 2002 1 12 Barkindji 2005 1 13 Noosa 2007 1 14 Great Sandy 2009 1 AUS AUSTRIA/AUTRICHE/AUSTRIA 1 1 Gossenköllesse 1977 1 2 Gurgler Kamm 1977 1 3 Lobau 1977 1 4 Neusiedler See 1977 1 5 Grosses Walsertal 2000 1 6 Wienerwald 2005 1 7 Salzburger Lungau & Kärntner Nockberge 2012 1 BYE BELARUS 1 1 Berezinskiy 1978 1 2 Belovezhskaya Pushcha 1993 1 Pribuzhskoye Polesie (West Polesie Transboundary Biosphere 3 Reserve Belarus/Poland/Ukraine TBR) 2012 1 BEN BENIN 1 1 Pendjari 1986 1 2 "W" Region (TBR Benin/Burkina Faso/Niger) 2002 1 BOL BOLIVIA/BOLIVIE/BOLIVIA
    [Show full text]
  • Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program: December 2003 to April 2007
    Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program: December 2003 to April 2007 Report to the Department of Finance and Deregulation, from the Director of National Parks September 2008 2 Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program Project Contributions Project coordination: D.J. James; Field survey: D.J. James, K. Retallick; Data management, GIS: D.J. James, K. Retallick; Analyses and reporting: D.J. James Citation This document can be cited as: Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program: December 2003 to April 2007. Report to the Department of Finance and Deregulation from the Director of National Parks © Director of National Parks 2008 Christmas Island Biodiversity Monitoring Program 3 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................7 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................9 1.1 Checklist of flora and fauna of Christmas Island.....................................................................9 1.2 Christmas Island biodiversity inventory database.................................................................10 2. CHRISTMAS ISLAND PIPISTRELLE ........................................................................................11 2.1 Summary of the results .........................................................................................................11 2.2 Research and monitoring methods .......................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation of an Industrial Brownfield Into an Ecological Buffer for Michigan’S Only Ramsar Wetland of International Importance
    OPEN ACCESS www. wsforum.org Article Transformation of an Industrial Brownfield into an Ecological Buffer for Michigan’s only Ramsar Wetland of International Importance John Hartig 1,* and Allison Krueger 2 E-Mails: [email protected]; [email protected] *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-734-692-7608; Fax: +1-734-692-7603 Received: / Accepted: / Published: Abstract: The Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge spans 77 km along the Detroit River and western Lake Erie, and is the only international wildlife refuge in North America. A key unit of the refuge is the 166-ha Humbug Marsh that represents the last kilometer of natural shoreline on the U.S. mainland of the river and Michigan’s only “Wetland of International Importance” designated under the 1971 International Ramsar Convention. Adjacent to Humbug Marsh is an 18-ha former industrial manufacturing site (now called the Refuge Gateway) that is being remediated and restored as an ecological buffer for Humbug Marsh and the future home of the refuge’s visitor center. Restoration and redevelopment activities have included: cleanup and capping of contaminated lands; daylighting a creek and constructing a retention pond and emergent wetland to treat storm water prior to discharge to the Detroit River; restoring coastal wetland, riparian buffer, and upland habitats; and constructing two roads, hiking/biking trails, and a kayak/canoe landing to offer wildlife-compatible public uses that allow visitors to experience this internationally- recognized natural resource. This project has been described as transformational for the region by restoring an industrial brownfield into high quality wildlife habitat that expands the ecological buffer of a Ramsar site.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands Fact Sheet 23
    Environmental Defender’s Office of Western Australia (Inc.) Wetlands Fact Sheet 23 Updated December 2010 An introduction to Wetlands Western Australia contains a large number of significant wetlands that provide important habitats for native plants and animals. Many of these wetlands have been damaged or destroyed by land developments, the alteration of natural water system regimes and pollution. In agricultural areas, significant land clearing has led to many naturally saline lakes and marshes becoming hyper-saline and unable to sustain native species. It is estimated that over 80% of the wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain have been destroyed, with only 15% retaining high conservation values. This fact sheet examines the legal protection that applies to wetlands in Western Australia and identifies the bodies responsible for their management. For information on the laws relating to other water resources, see Fact Sheet 21: River, watercourses and groundwater. What are wetlands? The Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914 (WA) (“RIWI Act”) defines a wetland as a natural collection of water (permanent or temporary) on the surface of any land and includes any lake, lagoon, swamp or marsh; and a natural collection of water that has been artificially altered. A wetland is not a watercourse (i.e. any river, creek, stream, brook or reservoir in which water flows into, through or out of; or any place where water flows that is prescribed by local by-laws to be a watercourse). Under the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat 1971 (“Ramsar Convention”), a wide variety of natural and human-made habitat types can be classified as wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fishes of the Azores: an Annotated Checklist and Bibliography
    MARINE FISHES OF THE AZORES: AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST AND BIBLIOGRAPHY. RICARDO SERRÃO SANTOS, FILIPE MORA PORTEIRO & JOÃO PEDRO BARREIROS SANTOS, RICARDO SERRÃO, FILIPE MORA PORTEIRO & JOÃO PEDRO BARREIROS 1997. Marine fishes of the Azores: An annotated checklist and bibliography. Arquipélago. Life and Marine Sciences Supplement 1: xxiii + 242pp. Ponta Delgada. ISSN 0873-4704. ISBN 972-9340-92-7. A list of the marine fishes of the Azores is presented. The list is based on a review of the literature combined with an examination of selected specimens available from collections of Azorean fishes deposited in museums, including the collection of fish at the Department of Oceanography and Fisheries of the University of the Azores (Horta). Personal information collected over several years is also incorporated. The geographic area considered is the Economic Exclusive Zone of the Azores. The list is organised in Classes, Orders and Families according to Nelson (1994). The scientific names are, for the most part, those used in Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean (FNAM) (Whitehead et al. 1989), and they are organised in alphabetical order within the families. Clofnam numbers (see Hureau & Monod 1979) are included for reference. Information is given if the species is not cited for the Azores in FNAM. Whenever available, vernacular names are presented, both in Portuguese (Azorean names) and in English. Synonyms, misspellings and misidentifications found in the literature in reference to the occurrence of species in the Azores are also quoted. The 460 species listed, belong to 142 families; 12 species are cited for the first time for the Azores.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item XI Ramsar COP11 DOC. 8 Report of the Secretary General
    11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) “Wetlands: home and destination” Bucharest, Romania, 6-13 July 2012 Agenda item XI Ramsar COP11 DOC. 8 Report of the Secretary General pursuant to Article 8.2 concerning the List of Wetlands of International Importance Explanatory note: This paper provides information received at the Secretariat up to 2 June 2012 which is required to be presented to COP11 under the terms of Article 8.2 of the Convention. The information provided below should be updated by Contracting Parties, if necessary, just before or during COP11 through written texts submitted to the Secretariat, and as appropriate these will then be incorporated into a revised COP11 DR 4 on “The status of sites in the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance” to be considered during COP11. Parties are requested not to repeat orally during the plenary session their written updates that have been provided to the Secretariat, “in order to save time spent on corrections and comments during plenary sessions” (Decision SC42-7). See also COP11 DOC. 3 Add.1 for further information about interventions during COP11 plenaries. 1. Article 8.2 of the text of the Convention on Wetlands states that the continuing duties of the Secretariat shall be, inter alia, “b) to maintain the List of Wetlands of International Importance and to be informed by the Contracting Parties of any additions, extensions, deletions or restrictions concerning wetlands included in the List provided in accordance
    [Show full text]
  • Concerning Traditional Ecological Knowledge
    COLLECTIVE LEGAL AUTONOMY CONCERNING TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE: THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND THEIR LINKAGES TO BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN COLOMBIA AND AUSTRALIA NATALIA RODRÍGUEZ-URIBE LLB Universidad de los Andes (Bogotá–Colombia) MIntEnvLaw, LLM Macquarie University (Sydney–Australia) MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL Macquarie University, Sydney–Australia This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Law Submitted: August 2013 Approved: March 2014 1 COLLECTIVE LEGAL AUTONOMY CONCERNING TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE NATALIA RODRÍGUEZ URIBE 2 COLLECTIVE LEGAL AUTONOMY CONCERNING TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE NATALIA RODRÍGUEZ URIBE TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................................................................. i Abstract ................................................................................................................................ v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. vi List of Acronyms, Abbreviations and Short Titles .............................................................ix Table of Cases .....................................................................................................................xi Human Rights Treaties Ratified by Australia ................................................................. xiii Tables and Figures ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]