DOCSLIB.ORG

Canadian Radiation Protection Association Association

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Canadian Radiation Protection Association Association Canadian Radiation Protection Association Vol 35 No 2 Association canadienne de radioprotection Welcome to the 2014 CRPA Conference To Boldly Go Where CRPA Pledged to Go / Pour aller là où l’ACRP s’engage à aller Career Development: Is It for You? CRP LET / TEL de l’ACRP Canadian Publications Mail Agreement 41574554 First Came the Monkeys, Then the Chimps . Now We’re Using Apricots! by Dave Niven, Radiation Protection Development Facilitator, CancerCare Manitoba, and a CRPA director CRPA has made good some good prog- ress recently in using technology more effectively: Survey Monkey for surveys, BallotBin for our elections and, most recently, MailChimp for our email news- however, we decided to take one of the letter. At our board meeting in November, most significant steps in bringing the CRPA into the 21st century by signing Résumé up for Wild Apricot. Now, I’ll admit to being a sucker for unique branding, took a lot of time to maintain the data- L’ACRP a commencé à utiliser Wild but Wild Apricot definitely goes much, base, process payments, issue reminders Apricot, un logiciel de gestion d’adhé- much deeper than that. Simply put, Wild and receipts and track conference informa- rents. Entre autres fonctionnalités, Apricot is a membership management tion—and more time spent on those tasks Wild Apricot permet aux adhérents software package. Less than a year ago meant higher office costs for CRPA. d’accéder à leur profil et de le gérer à I had no idea that such a thing even Wild Apricot makes every aspect of leur guise. Dorénavant, le rappel des existed, but believe me when I say there that easier. All our information is now renouvellements d’adhésions, le paie- are actually many options out there. The stored in an actual database instead of ment des adhésions et les inscriptions Board tested out a few of these packages a spreadsheet. As a member, you can au congrès se feront de manière auto- and ultimately settled on Wild Apricot. login to your profile and update your matisée. La base de données fournit So what exactly is membership information anytime. Changing jobs? également des métadonnées telles le management software? It helps us do Just login and update your new address. nombre de nouveaux adhérents ou exactly that—manage our member database Forgot to submit your renewal receipt to encore le nombre d’inscriptions à un and all the information that’s associated your boss from two years ago? Just click cours désigné. Bien que le logiciel with it. If you renewed online for 2014 on your payment history to get the details fonctionne bien, nous continuons or registered online for the conference, you need. Life is better for our secretariat de travailler à l’intégration de Wild you’re probably already familiar with it. too. Membership renewal reminders are Apricot à notre site Web afin que nos However, in order to fully describe its automatically sent out to all our members, membres puissent accéder aux deux impact on CRPA, I should first explain payments are sent directly to our credit systèmes en n’ouvrant qu’une seule how we used it to manage our informa- card processor, and receipts are generated session. Dès que l’installation sera tion. Member names, membership levels, automatically and sent out right away. entièrement complétée, nous serons contact information, conference regis- Conference registrations and payments are en mesure d’utiliser ce logiciel pour trations, receipts, etc. were all managed handled the same way. This will results in les blogues et les forums de discus- in—you guessed it—excel. Anytime we pro- significant savings in both Secretariat time sion. En utilisant Wild Apricot, nous cessed a payment, our secretariat would and CRPA funds—Wild Apricot only costs utilisons nos ressources plus efficace- have to call up our payment processor and CRPA $540/year. ment en créant une version améliorée punch in the credit card numbers over a From a behind-the-scenes perspective, de notre communauté en ligne, tout touchtone phone. Although our member- the board can now simply query the en simplifiant les interactions avec ship isn’t so large that it could possibly database to instantly see information like nos membres. overwhelm an Excel spreadsheet, it still continued on page 38 . CRPA Bulletin / Bulletin de l’ACRP Vol 35 No 2 / 5 Canadian Radiation Protection Association /Association canadienne de radioprotection CRPA Committees / Comités de l’ACRP CRPA is an affi liate of the International Radiation Protection Association / L’ACRP est membre Archives de l’Association internationale de radioprotection. Sunil Choubal (chair / président), Leona Page (BoD / CA1) President / Président Secretary / Secrétaire Communication Chunsheng Li Leona Page ph: 613-954-0299 Dave Niven (chair / président and BoD/CA), Ralph Bose, Lamri Cheriet, Kellie Franz, Roger email: [email protected] Treasurer / Trésorier Mike Grey Hugron, Stephane Jean-François (Bulletin President Elect / Président désigné editor-in-chief / rédacteur en chef du Bulletin), Jeff Dovyak Directors / Directeurs et directrices Hoa Ly, Chester Neduzak, Tanya Neretljak (Web Ralph Bose, Dave Niven, Pauline Jones, Champion / présidente), Scott Nichelson, Leona Past President / Président sortant Manon Rouleau Page, Jeff Sandeman Gary H. Kramer Conference / Conférence Gary Wilson (chair / président), Ralph Bose, Pam Ellis, Raymond Ilson, Pauline Jones, Liz Krivonosov, Jeff Dovyak (BoD/CA), Ali Prospectus L’objectif de l’Association canadienne de Shoushtarian radioprotection (ACRP) est de faire progresser le développement et la communication des CRPA Position Statements / The objective of the Canadian Radiation Pro- connaissances scientifi ques et des moyens Déclarations publiques de l’ACRP Gary Kramer (chair / président) tection Association (CRPA) is to advance the pratiques pour protéger les personnes et leur development and communication of scientifi c milieu contre les effets nocifs des rayonne- Finance / fi nances knowledge and practical means for protecting ments, en harmonie avec l’utilisation optimale Ray Ilson (chair / président), Mike Grey (BoD people and their environment from the harmful des rayonnements au profi t de la société. À Liaison /Liaison avec le CA), Ali Shoustarian effects of radiation consistent with the optimal cette fi n, l’ACRP désire : International Liaison / Liaison internationale use of radiation for the benefi t of society. To 1. améliorer l’échange d’informations scienti- Chris Clement (chair / président), Kevin Bundy, this end, CRPA will fi ques et techniques liées à la science et à Chunsheng Li (BoD/CA), Liz Krivonosov, Michèle Légaré-Vézina, Richard Wassenaar 1. further the exchange of scientifi c and tech- la pratique de la radioprotection; nical information relating to the science and 2. encourager la recherche et la publica- Membership / Recrutement practice of radiation protection, tion d’articles scientifi ques, toutes deux Emmy Duran (chair / présidente), Ralph Bose vouées à la science et à la pratique de la (BoD/CA), Jahan Quaji, Steve Webster 2. encourage research and scientifi c publica- radioprotection; tions dedicated to the science and practice Nominations of radiation protection, 3. promouvoir les possibilités pédagogiques Debbie Frattinger (chair / présidente), Pauline de ces disciplines qui soutiennent la sci- Jones (BoD/CA), Joe Cortese, Gary Hughes 3. promote educational opportunities in those ence et la pratique de la radioprotection; disciplines that support the science and Professional Development / développement practice of radiation protection, 4. aider à l’élaboration de normes pro- professionnel fessionnelles dans la discipline de la Trevor Beniston (chair / président), Edward 4. assist in the development of professional radioprotection; Bump, Mike Grey (BoD Liaison /Liaison avec le standards in the discipline of radiation 5. soutenir les activités d’autres sociétés, as- CA), Joe Cortese, Sandu Sonoc protection, and sociations et organisations, tant nationales Registered Radiation Safety Professionals 5. support the activities of other societies, as- qu’internationales, ayant des activités (RRSP) / Professionnels de la radioprotection sociations, and organizations, both national pertinentes avec ce qui précède. accrédités (PRA) and international, having any activities Les membres de l’association proviennent de Tanya Neretljak (chair / presidente, Ontario), relevant to the foregoing. tous les horizons de la radioprotection, y com- Jean-Pierre Gauvin, (PQ/QC), Jeff Dovyak (BoD/ CA, West / Ouest ), Brandon Hardy (Maritimes) The association publishes the Bulletin four pris les hôpitaux, les universités, l’industrie nucléaire génératrice d’électricité et tous les • RRSP Registration Subcommittee / PRA times a year and distributes it to all members. niveaux du gouvernement. sous-comité de l’inscription Subscription rates for non-members, such as Jeff Dovyak(chair /président), Steve Webster libraries, may be obtained from the secretariat. L’association publie le Bulletin quatre fois par (Exam Coordinator / coordinateur des an et le fait parvenir à tous les membres. Le examens), Lamri Cheriet, Susan Yeung, Members of the association are drawn from all prix d’un abonnement pour les non-membres, Christopher Malcolmson areas of radiation protection, including hospi- par exemple une bibliothèque, peut être • RRSP Maintenance Subcommittee / PRA tals, universities, the nuclear power industry, obtenu auprès du secrétariat. sous-comité du maintien and all levels of government. Les membres sont classés selon cinq caté- Brandon
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MEETING of St. Petersburg
    Joint Institute for Nuclear Research MEETING of St. Petersburg Fourth International conference, dedicated to N.W. Timofeeff-Ressovsky and his scientific school MODERN PROBLEMS OF GENETICS, RADIOBIOLOGY, RADIOECOLOGY, AND EVOLUTION Fourth Readings after V.I. Korogodin & V.I. Shevchenko IUR Advanced Research Workshop RADIOECOLOGY MEETS RADIOBIOLOGY: A REAPPRAISAL OF BASIC MECHANISMS OF RADIATION St. Petersburg, 2-6 June 2015 ABSTRACTS PAPERS BY YOUNG SCIENTISTS Dubna, 2015 1 The collection contains Theses of the reports presented at the Meeting of St. Petersburg and Short papers by young scientists submitted to the competition after N.W. Timofeeff-Ressovsky. The Theses and young scientists Papers are published in the authors’ wording. The responsibility for misprints in the report and paper texts is held by the authors of the reports. The book is composed by V.L. Korogodina. Title page design: V.L. Korogodina. 2 ORGANIZERS: Department of Biological Sciences, RAS; Genetics Department of Moscow State University; Genetics and Biotechnology Department of SPb State University; Genetics Society of America; International Union of Radioecology; Institute of Cytology and Genetics SD RAS, Novosibirsk; Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, UD RAS, Yekaterinburg; Institute of Medicine-Biology Problems, Moscow; Institute of Industrial Ecology, UD RAS, Yekaterinburg; International Association of Academies of Sciences; Joint Council “Biology and Medicine”; Joint Institute for Nuclear Research; Medical Radiological Scientific Centre, Russian Ministry of Healthcare, Obninsk; National Academy of Sciences of Belarus; National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Radiology and Agroecology, Obninsk; St. Petersburg Scientific Centre, RAS; Scientific Council “Ecology and Natural Resources”; Scientific Council on Genetics and Breeding, RAS; Scientific Council on Radiobiological Problems, RAS; The Max Delbruck Molecular Medicine Centre (Berlin-Buch, Germany); The N.I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Sink: the Human Body As the Ultimate Radioactive Storage Site
    How to cite: Brown, Kate. “The Last Sink: The Human Body as the Ultimate Radioactive Storage Site.” In: “Out of Sight, Out of Mind: The Politics and Culture of Waste,” edited by Christof Mauch, RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society 2016, no. 1, 41–47. RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society is an open-access publication. It is available online at www.environmentandsociety.org/perspectives. Articles may be downloaded, copied, and redistributed free of charge and the text may be reprinted, provided that the author and source are attributed. Please include this cover sheet when redistributing the article. To learn more about the Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society, please visit www.rachelcarsoncenter.org. Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society Leopoldstrasse 11a, 80802 Munich, GERMANY ISSN (print) 2190-5088 ISSN (online) 2190-8087 © Copyright of the text is held by the Rachel Carson Center. Image copyright is retained by the individual artists; their permission may be required in case of reproduction. Out of Sight, Out of Mind 41 Kate Brown The Last Sink: The Human Body as the Ultimate Radioactive Storage Site Living in Chelyabinsk, Russia, while researching a closed nuclear city, I got distracted by the supposedly hidden secrets of the security zone. It took an old woman and her scarred body to get me to see the real secrets. She taught me that a bigger story was right before me, on the bodies of the people I met. These were secrets so close I could reach out and touch them. I was in Chelyabinsk to find out more about Ozersk, a pretty little city in a northern birch and pine forest surrounded by lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholars' Forum Report
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Scholars’ Forum Report November 9-10, 2015 Manhattan Project National Historical Park New Mexico, Tennessee, Washington Scholars’ Forum Report Department of Energy Sites within the National Park Service Manhattan Project National Historical Park U.S. Department of the Interior Hanford Washington (page 3) Los Alamos Oak Ridge New Mexico Tennessee (page 2) (page 4) Legend Locations OFFICE: Lands Resources Program REGION: Intermountain Region Pacific West Region Southeast Region PARK: MAPR DATE: September 2015 MAP NUMBER: 540/129,780 (Page 1 of 4) 0 250 500 750 1,000 Miles Manhattan Project National Historical Park Contents Background . 2. High Level Theme Topics . .2 . Day 1 . 3 Big Picture Ideas on How to Interpret the Manhattan Project . 3. Potential Interpretive Theme Topics . 4 Day 2 . .10 . Common Themes . 10. High Level Theme Topics and Subtopics . 10 Attachments . .14 . Attendees . 44 Cover Photo A meeting regarding the 184-inch cyclotron project, held at the University of California, Berkeley, on March 29, 1940. Left to right: Ernest O. Lawrence, Arthur H. Compton,Vannevar Bush, James B. Conant, Karl T. Compton, and Alfred L. Loomis. The photograph is reprinted in Richard G. Hewlett and Oscar E. Anderson, Jr., The New World, 1939-1946: Volume I, A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission(Washington: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 1972), opposite page 33. 1 Scholars’ Forum Report Background In December 2014, Congress authorized a new park called the Manhattan Project National Historical Park, which will be jointly administered by the National Park Service and the Department of Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Decision Hanford 100 Area Superfund Site 100
    RECORD OF DECISION HANFORD 100 AREA SUPERFUND SITE 100-DR-1, 100-DR-2, 100-HR-1, 100-HR-2, and 100-HR-3 OPERABLE UNITS July 2018 ii Table of Contents PART I: DECLARATION OF THE RECORD OF DECISION ........................................................... 1 1.0 Site Name and Location .................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Statement of Basis and Purpose ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 Assessment of the Site ...................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Description of Selected Remedy ....................................................................................... 1 4.1 Overall Site Cleanup Strategy .................................................................................... 1 4.2 Principal Threat Wastes at the Site ............................................................................. 2 4.3 Major Components of the Selected Remedy .............................................................. 2 5.0 Statutory Determinations................................................................................................... 6 6.0 ROD Data Certification Checklist ..................................................................................... 7 7.0 Authorizing Signatures ...................................................................................................... 8 PART II: DECISION SUMMARY ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • James V. Neel and Yuri E. Dubrova: Cold War Debates and the Genetic Effects of Low-Dose Radiation
    Journal of the History of Biology (2015) 48:67–98 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 DOI 10.1007/s10739-014-9385-0 James V. Neel and Yuri E. Dubrova: Cold War Debates and the Genetic Effects of Low-Dose Radiation DONNA M. GOLDSTEIN Department of Anthropology Hale Building, Campus Box 233 University of Colorado-Boulder Boulder, CO 80309-0233 USA E-mail: [email protected] MAGDALENA E. STAWKOWSKI Department of Anthropology Hale Building, Campus Box 233 University of Colorado-Boulder Boulder, CO 80309-0233 USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. This article traces disagreements about the genetic effects of low-dose radiation exposure as waged by James Neel (1915–2000), a central figure in radiation studies of Japanese populations after World War II, and Yuri Dubrova (1955–), who analyzed the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident. In a 1996 article in Nature, Dubrova reported a statistically significant increase in the minisatellite (junk) DNA mutation rate in the children of parents who received a high dose of radiation from the Chernobyl accident, contradicting studies that found no significant inherited genetic effects among offspring of Japanese A-bomb survivors. Neel’s subsequent defense of his large-scale longitudinal studies of the genetic effects of ionizing radiation consolidated current scientific understandings of low-dose ionizing radiation. The article seeks to explain how the Hiroshima/Nagasaki data remain hegemonic in radiation studies, contextualizing the debate with attention to the perceived inferiority of Soviet genetic science during the Cold War. Keywords: Radiation studies, Low-dose radiation, Genetic effects, Cold War, James V.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae for Steven Seegel
    Steven Seegel CV revised August 2021 Professor of Slavic and Eurasian Studies The University of Texas at Austin UT Center for Russian, East European and Eurasian Studies Department of Slavic and Eurasian Studies 2505 University Ave., F-3600 Austin, TX 78712 preferred email: [email protected] Twitter: @steven_seegel Facebook (public): https://www.facebook.com/steven.seegel/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/steven-seegel-60b3a6116/ Academia.edu: https://unco.academia.edu/StevenSeegel ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Steven_Seegel Homepage: stevenseegel.com TEACHING EXPERIENCE AND WORK HISTORY August 2021-present: Professor (tenured, full rank) of Slavic and Eurasian Studies, The University of Texas at Austin 2019-present: New Books Network podcaster and host (~10,000 archived author-feature interviews, now 104 channels, 1.6M downloads/month; I have completed 70+ podcasts) 2017-2021: Professor (tenured, full rank) of History, University of Northern Colorado 2020-2021: Visiting Guest Lecturer, San Diego State University, History Dept. 2012-2017: Associate Professor of History, University of Northern Colorado 2008-2012: Assistant Professor of History, University of Northern Colorado 2008: Director of the Harvard Ukrainian Summer Institute (HUSI), Harvard University 2007-2008: Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of History and Political Science, Worcester State College (now Worcester State University) 2006-2007: Post-doc Eugene and Daymel Shklar Research Fellow, Harvard University 2005-2006: Post-doc Lecturer, History
    [Show full text]
  • Empire of Calamity: Making Plutonium in Stalin's Russia
    EMPIRE OF CALAMITY: MAKING PLUTONIUM IN STALIN’S RUSSIA An NCEEER Working Paper by Kate Brown University of Maryland, Baltimore County National Council for Eurasian and East European Research University of Washington Box 353650 Seattle, WA 98195 [email protected] http://www.nceeer.org/ TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Principal Investigator: Kate Brown NCEEER Contract Number: 825-07 Date: October 11, 2011 Copyright Information Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funded through a contract or grant from the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER). However, the NCEEER and the United States Government have the right to duplicate and disseminate, in written and electronic form, reports submitted to NCEEER to fulfill Contract or Grant Agreements either (a) for NCEEER’s own internal use, or (b) for use by the United States Government, and as follows: (1) for further dissemination to domestic, international, and foreign governments, entities and/or individuals to serve official United States Government purposes or (2) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the United States Government granting the public access to documents held by the United States Government. Neither NCEEER nor the United States Government nor any recipient of this Report may use it for commercial sale. * The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available by the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended).
    [Show full text]
  • Bodily Secrets: Radiation and Reading the Body Kate Brown
    Bodily Secrets: Radiation and Reading the Body Kate Brown Chapter from Being There: Misadventures in Writing History (forthcoming Univ of Chicago Press) The Province of Chelyabinsk and the neighboring Province of Sverdlovsk, deep in the Russian continent, used to be off-limits to foreigners. In the United States that would be like placing a ban on the states of Montana, Wyoming and a good part of Idaho. The travel restriction was lifted in the early 1990s, but the city of Chelyabinsk is still no tourist destination. I met no other foreigners while I lived in Chelyabinsk, a Russian steel-town of a million people and million more yards of rusting pipe and heavy machinery. In the courtyard of my apartment building, a neighbor inquired where I was from. She was asking, she said, because the last person who had lived in my rental unit was from her hometown of Turgan and, it turned out, he knew her relatives. Perhaps we too might have a common connection? When I asked her if she had family in Chicago, a wave of dread crossed her face before she forced a laugh. That look gave me a first glimpse of the vast and sweeping Russian nuclear security regime, of which Chelyabinsk is a small part. Security regimes are strange affairs. They sort knowledge and appear to prioritize and hide the most significant information. But that is a mirage. No security system does that. The most sequestered, top-secret information can be banal and inconsequential, while what is important to know can be right there, hidden by its very ordinariness.
    [Show full text]
  • Call for Papers -International Conference PARIS -JAN 2022
    Call for Papers Tests in the Desert? Towards a Comparative and Transnational History of Nuclear Test Sites International Conference, Paris, 19-21 January 2022 (CRESAT, MSHP, INALCO) Argument: Deserts, Steppes and Oceans: The Social Construction of Emptiness The research group “ Écrire l’histoire du Centre d’Expérimentation du Pacifique (CEP)” [Writing the History of the CEP (French nuclear test site in French Polynesia)] has, since 2019, held a series of seminars under the heading “For a transnational and comparative history of nuclear sites and tests” (MSH-Pacifique-CRESAT- INALCO). In these seminars the group, comprised of some fifteen researchers from various disciplines - history, art history, geography, sociology, literary studies and anthropology - has examined the sharing and transfer of experiences in relation to the tests among decision-makers, activists and indeed all those involved directly or indirectly in a regime of nuclearity which may be defined as the consciousness of being a participant in the life of a nuclear site and its facilities. As a result of the seminars and the contacts established between presenters and public, both from France and abroad, we became keen not only to communicate the fruits of our research on the CEP but also to relate this to comparable situations elsewhere. This has led us to organise an international conference on nuclear testing sites worldwide, with regard to the physical space of sites, the politics involved and the environment. The conference aims to examine the reasons behind the choice of sites, the construction and operation of the facilities, the various actors and their interrelationships, and the legacies of locations perceived as being on the fringes, in deserts, steppes, and oceans, but which occupy a central place in the memories of the respective human societies, yet about which there is still little documentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinner at the Fission Chips
    COMMENT BOOKS & ARTS one of Brown’s ‘plutopias’: a stage-managed American idyll where everyone was white, middle class and loved the bomb. Yet Rich- land’s chintzy Americana — the Fission Chips restaurant or the high school with the mushroom-cloud mascot — concealed a calculated programme to keep residents OF ENERGY US DEPARTMENT ignorant of the risks. These were considerable. Hanford’s operators used the surrounding country- side as a vast dumping ground. They rea- soned that dissipating the radioisotopes in river water, or the atmosphere, was the best way to dilute any danger. Radioactive waste poured daily into the environment, while hundreds of millions of ‘hot particles’ of radioactive metal fell like deadly snow across Richland. Meanwhile, the town grew into a corporate dictatorship, where plant managers controlled citizens’ lives in a way that would have made a Soviet general proud. Time and again, official review com- mittees denied the evidence. In the early Plutonium samples trundled around Hanford, the world’s first plutonium plant, in 1954. years, site medics tested workers after long weekends, when most of the radioisotope MILITARY HISTORY contamination had already been urinated from the body. In 1958, the Atomic Energy Commission reported to Congress that from 1944 to 1958 there had been only one Dinner at the radiation-related injury at Hanford, out of 18,000 workers. In fact, by 1959, infant deaths in Richland were four times the state average. Fission Chips A pivotal point was the physicist Ernest Sternglass’s 1963 paper in Science showing a link between maternal exposure to X-rays Mark Peplow assesses a chronicle of the blighted US and and child mortality from cancer, with Soviet communities that fuelled the nuclear arms race.
    [Show full text]
  • Roundtable on Brown
    H-Environment Roundtable Reviews Volume 4, No. 9 (2014) Publication date: October 30, 2014 https://networks.h-net.org/h- Roundtable Review Editor: environment Christopher F. Jones Kate Brown, Plutopia: Nuclear Families, Atomic Cities, and the Great Soviet and American Plutonium Disasters (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013) ISBN 978- 0199855766 Contents Introduction by Christopher F. Jones, Arizona State University 2 Comments by Paul Josephson, Colby College 4 Comments by Kristen Iversen, University of Cincinnati 7 Comments by Jacob Darwin Hamblin, Oregon State University 10 Author’s Response by Kate Brown, University of Maryland, Baltimore County 14 About the Contributors 21 Copyright © 2014 H-Net: Humanities and Social Sciences Online H-Net permits the redistribution and reprinting of this work for nonprofit, educational purposes, with full and accurate attribution to the author, web location, date of publication, H-Environment, and H-Net: Humanities & Social Sciences Online. H-Environment Roundtable Reviews, Vol. 4, No.9 (2014) 2 Introduction by Christopher F. Jones, Arizona State University he Cold War can be described as a period of opposites: capitalist versus communist; open versus closed; West versus East. While the United States Tand Soviet Union were, of course, two sides of the same coin in a global pursuit of power, their differences typically attract much more attention than their similarities. This is true of most historical accounts, and it is true of many historical actors as well. Leading figures in the United States and Soviet Union often proclaimed the distinctions between the superpowers as they sought legitimation for their actions from their citizens and the international community.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Manual for Survival by Kate Brown - Atmospheric Contamination with Ruthenium-106 Detected in Europe in to Cite This Article: Jim Smith 2020 J
    Journal of Radiological Protection OPINION ARTICLE • OPEN ACCESS Recent citations Review of Manual for Survival by Kate Brown - Atmospheric contamination with ruthenium-106 detected in Europe in To cite this article: Jim Smith 2020 J. Radiol. Prot. 40 337 Autumn 2017 Richard Wakeford View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 148.197.86.4 on 02/04/2020 at 09:33 | Society for Radiological Protection Journal of Radiological Protection J. Radiol. Prot. 40 (2020) 337–348 (12pp) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ab17f2 Opinion Article Review of Manual for Survival by Kate Brown Jim Smith School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Burnaby Building, Burnaby Road, Portsmouth, PO1 3QL, United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] My review, based on nearly thirty years of research on Chernobyl and dozens of visits to the contaminated areas of Belarus, Ukraine and Russia, argues that Manual for Survival ignores the thousands of scientific studies on Chernobyl which are available in the international scientific literature. In doing so, it presents a biased and misleading account of the health and environmental effects of the accident. I believe that this book only perpetuates the many myths about the accident effects and has very little basis in sound science. Keywords: review, Chernobyl, health, radiation, radioactivity Manual for Survival is an interesting, but deeply flawed history of the health and environ- mental impacts of Chernobyl, the worst technological disaster in human history. It would be all too easy to dismiss it for its multiple omissions, inconsistencies and errors.
    [Show full text]