Plutopia Forever

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plutopia Forever physicsworld.com Reviews Alexei Kojevnikov white-collar professionals in the rest of the country. The litany of environmental crimes at both plutopia sites extends over decades. During the early years, Plutopia forever in a hurry to produce plutonium, the plants often processed irradiated fuel without letting it cool down long enough for the most radioac- tive, short-lived isotopes to decay. And when the Maiak Combine’s waste-storage facility overfilled in 1949, Soviet managers did not dare Reuters/Denis SinyakovReuters/Denis interrupt production. Instead, they decided to release radioactive liq- uids into the river Techa, contami- nating its basin forever. That same year, their American counterparts ordered the so-called “Green Run” – a release of highly radioactive waste into the Columbia River that was, they claimed, a scientific experiment. The waste facilities at both sites leaked and released isotopes into the air. Originally meant to be tem- porary, they were constructed upon a wishful assumption that science would eventually figure out how to Inhospitable zone Kate Brown does research in places ject, housing workers from the US dispose of radioactive garbage. In The area around the where most of her colleagues pre- plutonium-production facility in a 1957 a storage container at Maiak Techa river in Russia fer not to travel. Her wonderful racially segregated settlement. After overheated and exploded, produc- remains radioactively first book, A Biography of No Place the end of the Second World War, it ing Chernobyl-scale contamina- contaminated (2005), explored the pre-Second- evolved into a futuristic city that pro- tion in the Urals. Soviet authorities decades after the World-War history of the west- vided its residents – predominantly ordered the resettlement of villages nearby Maiak ernmost borderland of the Soviet blue-collar workers – with privileged from the most dangerous area along Combine’s Union, which was then home to a middle-class salaries and standards the Techa, but the resettlement took radioactive-waste mix of ethnic minorities, including of living, including better housing, several years and was not even com- facility overflowed. Polish, German, Ukrainian and schools, policing and special health- pleted, leaving some inhabitants Jewish. For her new book Plutopia, care services. within the heavily polluted zone. Plutopia: Nuclear Brown visited two of the world’s most In the early years, Richland’s In the US, special interests of land Families, Atomic radioactively contaminated regions: Soviet counterpart, Ozersk, segre- speculators ensured that areas near Cities, and the the areas near the Hanford Nuclear gated its permanent civilian work- the Hanford site were irrigated and Great Soviet and Reservation in Washington State force from conscripted soldiers and sold to aspiring farmers who were American and the Maiak Combine in the Ural prisoners, but motivated them with not informed of the risks. Plutonium Disasters Mountains, once the centres of plu- the sense of duty and self-sacrifice Plant supervisors – whether Kate Brown tonium production for the Ameri- that came directly out of the war- appointed by Soviet atomic agen- 2013 Oxford can and Soviet nuclear industries. time effort of saving the country cies or by corporate subcontractors University Press Her primary interest lies in exposing from foreign invasion. Not only the such as General Electric or West- £16.88/$27.95hb the dark underside of their military- rank-and-file, but also top scientists inghouse – established similarly 416pp 528pp economic activities: the history of and generals, exposed themselves to styled regimes of corporate loyalty, environmental pollution and the high levels of radiation during work secrecy, public assurances of safety development of segregated “atomic emergencies. By 1960, when the and intimidation of whistle-blowers. cities” that provided privilege and Soviet Union had achieved a modi- In Plutopia, Brown gives voice to better protection for the plants’ per- cum of security through nuclear critics of the cover-up practices as manent staff, but not for the “com- deterrence, the city made a transi- she describes her travels to the pol- moners” who lived and farmed just tion to a more peacetime mode and luted areas, interviews those who outside the fence. followed Richland in adopting a con- challenged the atomic establishment Brown, a historian at the Univer- sumerist strategy. The concept of the or were victimized by it, and reports sity of Maryland, Baltimore County, “middle class” is not in a literal sense stories of accidents, illnesses and invented the word “plutopia” to applicable to Soviet society, which genetic deformities possibly related characterize these cities, whose did not permit the development of a to radioactive exposure. citizens were compensated for their truly rich, upper class. However, its Brown is aware that her inform- risky work and diminished liberties elites were allowed a lifestyle that ants are not always reliable sources. with an abundantly consumerist life- reminds Western observers of their Indeed, many are prone to the sorts of style designed to ensure their loyalty own middle classes; just as in Rich- rumours and conspiracy theories that and conformity. The city of Rich- land, blue-collar workers in Ozersk are abundantly generated around all land, near the Hanford site, began received salaries and perks that closed sites that place strict control as an outpost of the Manhattan Pro- would have been appropriate for over information. But at the same Physics World March 2014 55 Reviews physicsworld.com time, they are also bearers and collec- they still engaged in what Brown calls autobiographical books. Vladislav tors of unique information that has “a crime of opportunity” by studying Larin’s Kombinat Maiak (2005), the often been ignored or overlooked. diseases and genetic disorders among most detailed existing account of the Overall, Brown does a careful and villagers who had been left to live zone’s ecological problems, is used in convincing job as a sceptical inves- along the banks of the radioactive a limited way. Insiders – residents of tigator. She reports personal stories Techa for two generations. For the plutopia – could have provided more and tries to independently verify and more dangerous work of cleaning up information, both in writing and in separate reliable from unconfirmed and containing accidents, both sites possible interviews. parts, while admitting that many used so-called “jumpers” – workers The winding down of the Cold War questions remain unresolved. conscripted or hired on a limited- left plutopia’s managers worried: One such unresolved problem term basis who were subsequently what would happen to their cities and concerns health risks associated with transferred elsewhere and no longer employees once plutonium was no long-term exposure to radiation in monitored for health effects. longer a top priority for the govern- relatively low average doses. In the Brown visited contaminated vil- ment? As it turned out, pollution is a early years, when radiation monitor- lages on the Techa and talked to their profitable business and cleaning it up ing was restricted primarily to high- residents, but could not get inside the guarantees an even more perpetual intensity gamma rays, workers at security zone encircling Maiak and source of spending than the initial certain stages of plutonium produc- Ozersk. This leaves the Soviet side production of radioactive materi- tion were often overexposed to other of her story somewhat lacking in als. Thus, even in the post-Cold-War dangers. Having observed dete- primary accounts, especially for the world, grants continue to pour into riorating health and some terminal chapters describing the early years of the military-industrial complex of cases among employees, Soviet doc- construction. To fill the gap, she uses the atomic cities, and to the haves tors coined the term “chronic radia- narratives from the secondary liter- rather than the have-nots. In her tion sickness” and imposed limits on ature about atomic spies. However, conclusion, Brown hints cryptically the overall time workers could spend such literature is neither very relia- that “We are all citizens of plutopia.” in dangerous areas. Over the years, ble (when writing about spies, many Her core metaphor may indeed be they treated about 1000 patients suf- authors feel entitled to embellish sto- extendable to our increasingly seg- fering from this disease, but their ries beyond reason), nor especially regated societies, to those living in American colleagues have been relevant to the topic (unlike Los Ala- gated communities or in states heav- reluctant to accept the diagnosis. mos, Hanford is not known to have ily guarded against immigration, In the meantime, some medical leaked classified information to the and for whom the existence of such crimes were also committed. During Soviet side). At the same time, some freedom-restricting boundaries is the late 1960s, US researchers used very appropriate sources are miss- justified by the sense of entitlement, prisoners in Walla Walla, near the ing. I was surprised to find no men- privilege and hierarchy created by Hanford site, as experimental sub- tion of Zhores Medvedev, who blew the boundaries themselves. jects and exposed their testicles to the cover of secrecy over the 1957 high doses of radiation. Soviet doc- radioactive disaster in the Urals, or Alexei Kojevnikov is a historian at the tors did not deliberately set up condi- of Mikhail Grabovsky’s Plutonievaia University of British Columbia, Canada, tions for human experimentation, but Zona (2002) and other quasi- e-mail [email protected] Web life: AstroEDU Who is behind it? Anything else I should know? AstroEDU is managed by Edward Gomez of the Las Each activity comes with extensive Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope and Pedro documentation for teachers. Some also give Russo of Leiden University in the Netherlands, information on how the activity could fit into with support from the International Astronomy particular science curricula; for example, “Model Union’s Office for Development.
Recommended publications
  • MEETING of St. Petersburg
    Joint Institute for Nuclear Research MEETING of St. Petersburg Fourth International conference, dedicated to N.W. Timofeeff-Ressovsky and his scientific school MODERN PROBLEMS OF GENETICS, RADIOBIOLOGY, RADIOECOLOGY, AND EVOLUTION Fourth Readings after V.I. Korogodin & V.I. Shevchenko IUR Advanced Research Workshop RADIOECOLOGY MEETS RADIOBIOLOGY: A REAPPRAISAL OF BASIC MECHANISMS OF RADIATION St. Petersburg, 2-6 June 2015 ABSTRACTS PAPERS BY YOUNG SCIENTISTS Dubna, 2015 1 The collection contains Theses of the reports presented at the Meeting of St. Petersburg and Short papers by young scientists submitted to the competition after N.W. Timofeeff-Ressovsky. The Theses and young scientists Papers are published in the authors’ wording. The responsibility for misprints in the report and paper texts is held by the authors of the reports. The book is composed by V.L. Korogodina. Title page design: V.L. Korogodina. 2 ORGANIZERS: Department of Biological Sciences, RAS; Genetics Department of Moscow State University; Genetics and Biotechnology Department of SPb State University; Genetics Society of America; International Union of Radioecology; Institute of Cytology and Genetics SD RAS, Novosibirsk; Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, UD RAS, Yekaterinburg; Institute of Medicine-Biology Problems, Moscow; Institute of Industrial Ecology, UD RAS, Yekaterinburg; International Association of Academies of Sciences; Joint Council “Biology and Medicine”; Joint Institute for Nuclear Research; Medical Radiological Scientific Centre, Russian Ministry of Healthcare, Obninsk; National Academy of Sciences of Belarus; National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine; Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Radiology and Agroecology, Obninsk; St. Petersburg Scientific Centre, RAS; Scientific Council “Ecology and Natural Resources”; Scientific Council on Genetics and Breeding, RAS; Scientific Council on Radiobiological Problems, RAS; The Max Delbruck Molecular Medicine Centre (Berlin-Buch, Germany); The N.I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Sink: the Human Body As the Ultimate Radioactive Storage Site
    How to cite: Brown, Kate. “The Last Sink: The Human Body as the Ultimate Radioactive Storage Site.” In: “Out of Sight, Out of Mind: The Politics and Culture of Waste,” edited by Christof Mauch, RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society 2016, no. 1, 41–47. RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society is an open-access publication. It is available online at www.environmentandsociety.org/perspectives. Articles may be downloaded, copied, and redistributed free of charge and the text may be reprinted, provided that the author and source are attributed. Please include this cover sheet when redistributing the article. To learn more about the Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society, please visit www.rachelcarsoncenter.org. Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society Leopoldstrasse 11a, 80802 Munich, GERMANY ISSN (print) 2190-5088 ISSN (online) 2190-8087 © Copyright of the text is held by the Rachel Carson Center. Image copyright is retained by the individual artists; their permission may be required in case of reproduction. Out of Sight, Out of Mind 41 Kate Brown The Last Sink: The Human Body as the Ultimate Radioactive Storage Site Living in Chelyabinsk, Russia, while researching a closed nuclear city, I got distracted by the supposedly hidden secrets of the security zone. It took an old woman and her scarred body to get me to see the real secrets. She taught me that a bigger story was right before me, on the bodies of the people I met. These were secrets so close I could reach out and touch them. I was in Chelyabinsk to find out more about Ozersk, a pretty little city in a northern birch and pine forest surrounded by lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholars' Forum Report
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Scholars’ Forum Report November 9-10, 2015 Manhattan Project National Historical Park New Mexico, Tennessee, Washington Scholars’ Forum Report Department of Energy Sites within the National Park Service Manhattan Project National Historical Park U.S. Department of the Interior Hanford Washington (page 3) Los Alamos Oak Ridge New Mexico Tennessee (page 2) (page 4) Legend Locations OFFICE: Lands Resources Program REGION: Intermountain Region Pacific West Region Southeast Region PARK: MAPR DATE: September 2015 MAP NUMBER: 540/129,780 (Page 1 of 4) 0 250 500 750 1,000 Miles Manhattan Project National Historical Park Contents Background . 2. High Level Theme Topics . .2 . Day 1 . 3 Big Picture Ideas on How to Interpret the Manhattan Project . 3. Potential Interpretive Theme Topics . 4 Day 2 . .10 . Common Themes . 10. High Level Theme Topics and Subtopics . 10 Attachments . .14 . Attendees . 44 Cover Photo A meeting regarding the 184-inch cyclotron project, held at the University of California, Berkeley, on March 29, 1940. Left to right: Ernest O. Lawrence, Arthur H. Compton,Vannevar Bush, James B. Conant, Karl T. Compton, and Alfred L. Loomis. The photograph is reprinted in Richard G. Hewlett and Oscar E. Anderson, Jr., The New World, 1939-1946: Volume I, A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission(Washington: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 1972), opposite page 33. 1 Scholars’ Forum Report Background In December 2014, Congress authorized a new park called the Manhattan Project National Historical Park, which will be jointly administered by the National Park Service and the Department of Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Decision Hanford 100 Area Superfund Site 100
    RECORD OF DECISION HANFORD 100 AREA SUPERFUND SITE 100-DR-1, 100-DR-2, 100-HR-1, 100-HR-2, and 100-HR-3 OPERABLE UNITS July 2018 ii Table of Contents PART I: DECLARATION OF THE RECORD OF DECISION ........................................................... 1 1.0 Site Name and Location .................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Statement of Basis and Purpose ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 Assessment of the Site ...................................................................................................... 1 4.0 Description of Selected Remedy ....................................................................................... 1 4.1 Overall Site Cleanup Strategy .................................................................................... 1 4.2 Principal Threat Wastes at the Site ............................................................................. 2 4.3 Major Components of the Selected Remedy .............................................................. 2 5.0 Statutory Determinations................................................................................................... 6 6.0 ROD Data Certification Checklist ..................................................................................... 7 7.0 Authorizing Signatures ...................................................................................................... 8 PART II: DECISION SUMMARY ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • James V. Neel and Yuri E. Dubrova: Cold War Debates and the Genetic Effects of Low-Dose Radiation
    Journal of the History of Biology (2015) 48:67–98 Ó Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 DOI 10.1007/s10739-014-9385-0 James V. Neel and Yuri E. Dubrova: Cold War Debates and the Genetic Effects of Low-Dose Radiation DONNA M. GOLDSTEIN Department of Anthropology Hale Building, Campus Box 233 University of Colorado-Boulder Boulder, CO 80309-0233 USA E-mail: [email protected] MAGDALENA E. STAWKOWSKI Department of Anthropology Hale Building, Campus Box 233 University of Colorado-Boulder Boulder, CO 80309-0233 USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. This article traces disagreements about the genetic effects of low-dose radiation exposure as waged by James Neel (1915–2000), a central figure in radiation studies of Japanese populations after World War II, and Yuri Dubrova (1955–), who analyzed the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident. In a 1996 article in Nature, Dubrova reported a statistically significant increase in the minisatellite (junk) DNA mutation rate in the children of parents who received a high dose of radiation from the Chernobyl accident, contradicting studies that found no significant inherited genetic effects among offspring of Japanese A-bomb survivors. Neel’s subsequent defense of his large-scale longitudinal studies of the genetic effects of ionizing radiation consolidated current scientific understandings of low-dose ionizing radiation. The article seeks to explain how the Hiroshima/Nagasaki data remain hegemonic in radiation studies, contextualizing the debate with attention to the perceived inferiority of Soviet genetic science during the Cold War. Keywords: Radiation studies, Low-dose radiation, Genetic effects, Cold War, James V.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae for Steven Seegel
    Steven Seegel CV revised August 2021 Professor of Slavic and Eurasian Studies The University of Texas at Austin UT Center for Russian, East European and Eurasian Studies Department of Slavic and Eurasian Studies 2505 University Ave., F-3600 Austin, TX 78712 preferred email: [email protected] Twitter: @steven_seegel Facebook (public): https://www.facebook.com/steven.seegel/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/steven-seegel-60b3a6116/ Academia.edu: https://unco.academia.edu/StevenSeegel ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Steven_Seegel Homepage: stevenseegel.com TEACHING EXPERIENCE AND WORK HISTORY August 2021-present: Professor (tenured, full rank) of Slavic and Eurasian Studies, The University of Texas at Austin 2019-present: New Books Network podcaster and host (~10,000 archived author-feature interviews, now 104 channels, 1.6M downloads/month; I have completed 70+ podcasts) 2017-2021: Professor (tenured, full rank) of History, University of Northern Colorado 2020-2021: Visiting Guest Lecturer, San Diego State University, History Dept. 2012-2017: Associate Professor of History, University of Northern Colorado 2008-2012: Assistant Professor of History, University of Northern Colorado 2008: Director of the Harvard Ukrainian Summer Institute (HUSI), Harvard University 2007-2008: Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of History and Political Science, Worcester State College (now Worcester State University) 2006-2007: Post-doc Eugene and Daymel Shklar Research Fellow, Harvard University 2005-2006: Post-doc Lecturer, History
    [Show full text]
  • Empire of Calamity: Making Plutonium in Stalin's Russia
    EMPIRE OF CALAMITY: MAKING PLUTONIUM IN STALIN’S RUSSIA An NCEEER Working Paper by Kate Brown University of Maryland, Baltimore County National Council for Eurasian and East European Research University of Washington Box 353650 Seattle, WA 98195 [email protected] http://www.nceeer.org/ TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Principal Investigator: Kate Brown NCEEER Contract Number: 825-07 Date: October 11, 2011 Copyright Information Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funded through a contract or grant from the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research (NCEEER). However, the NCEEER and the United States Government have the right to duplicate and disseminate, in written and electronic form, reports submitted to NCEEER to fulfill Contract or Grant Agreements either (a) for NCEEER’s own internal use, or (b) for use by the United States Government, and as follows: (1) for further dissemination to domestic, international, and foreign governments, entities and/or individuals to serve official United States Government purposes or (2) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the United States Government granting the public access to documents held by the United States Government. Neither NCEEER nor the United States Government nor any recipient of this Report may use it for commercial sale. * The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available by the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended).
    [Show full text]
  • Bodily Secrets: Radiation and Reading the Body Kate Brown
    Bodily Secrets: Radiation and Reading the Body Kate Brown Chapter from Being There: Misadventures in Writing History (forthcoming Univ of Chicago Press) The Province of Chelyabinsk and the neighboring Province of Sverdlovsk, deep in the Russian continent, used to be off-limits to foreigners. In the United States that would be like placing a ban on the states of Montana, Wyoming and a good part of Idaho. The travel restriction was lifted in the early 1990s, but the city of Chelyabinsk is still no tourist destination. I met no other foreigners while I lived in Chelyabinsk, a Russian steel-town of a million people and million more yards of rusting pipe and heavy machinery. In the courtyard of my apartment building, a neighbor inquired where I was from. She was asking, she said, because the last person who had lived in my rental unit was from her hometown of Turgan and, it turned out, he knew her relatives. Perhaps we too might have a common connection? When I asked her if she had family in Chicago, a wave of dread crossed her face before she forced a laugh. That look gave me a first glimpse of the vast and sweeping Russian nuclear security regime, of which Chelyabinsk is a small part. Security regimes are strange affairs. They sort knowledge and appear to prioritize and hide the most significant information. But that is a mirage. No security system does that. The most sequestered, top-secret information can be banal and inconsequential, while what is important to know can be right there, hidden by its very ordinariness.
    [Show full text]
  • Call for Papers -International Conference PARIS -JAN 2022
    Call for Papers Tests in the Desert? Towards a Comparative and Transnational History of Nuclear Test Sites International Conference, Paris, 19-21 January 2022 (CRESAT, MSHP, INALCO) Argument: Deserts, Steppes and Oceans: The Social Construction of Emptiness The research group “ Écrire l’histoire du Centre d’Expérimentation du Pacifique (CEP)” [Writing the History of the CEP (French nuclear test site in French Polynesia)] has, since 2019, held a series of seminars under the heading “For a transnational and comparative history of nuclear sites and tests” (MSH-Pacifique-CRESAT- INALCO). In these seminars the group, comprised of some fifteen researchers from various disciplines - history, art history, geography, sociology, literary studies and anthropology - has examined the sharing and transfer of experiences in relation to the tests among decision-makers, activists and indeed all those involved directly or indirectly in a regime of nuclearity which may be defined as the consciousness of being a participant in the life of a nuclear site and its facilities. As a result of the seminars and the contacts established between presenters and public, both from France and abroad, we became keen not only to communicate the fruits of our research on the CEP but also to relate this to comparable situations elsewhere. This has led us to organise an international conference on nuclear testing sites worldwide, with regard to the physical space of sites, the politics involved and the environment. The conference aims to examine the reasons behind the choice of sites, the construction and operation of the facilities, the various actors and their interrelationships, and the legacies of locations perceived as being on the fringes, in deserts, steppes, and oceans, but which occupy a central place in the memories of the respective human societies, yet about which there is still little documentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinner at the Fission Chips
    COMMENT BOOKS & ARTS one of Brown’s ‘plutopias’: a stage-managed American idyll where everyone was white, middle class and loved the bomb. Yet Rich- land’s chintzy Americana — the Fission Chips restaurant or the high school with the mushroom-cloud mascot — concealed a calculated programme to keep residents OF ENERGY US DEPARTMENT ignorant of the risks. These were considerable. Hanford’s operators used the surrounding country- side as a vast dumping ground. They rea- soned that dissipating the radioisotopes in river water, or the atmosphere, was the best way to dilute any danger. Radioactive waste poured daily into the environment, while hundreds of millions of ‘hot particles’ of radioactive metal fell like deadly snow across Richland. Meanwhile, the town grew into a corporate dictatorship, where plant managers controlled citizens’ lives in a way that would have made a Soviet general proud. Time and again, official review com- mittees denied the evidence. In the early Plutonium samples trundled around Hanford, the world’s first plutonium plant, in 1954. years, site medics tested workers after long weekends, when most of the radioisotope MILITARY HISTORY contamination had already been urinated from the body. In 1958, the Atomic Energy Commission reported to Congress that from 1944 to 1958 there had been only one Dinner at the radiation-related injury at Hanford, out of 18,000 workers. In fact, by 1959, infant deaths in Richland were four times the state average. Fission Chips A pivotal point was the physicist Ernest Sternglass’s 1963 paper in Science showing a link between maternal exposure to X-rays Mark Peplow assesses a chronicle of the blighted US and and child mortality from cancer, with Soviet communities that fuelled the nuclear arms race.
    [Show full text]
  • Roundtable on Brown
    H-Environment Roundtable Reviews Volume 4, No. 9 (2014) Publication date: October 30, 2014 https://networks.h-net.org/h- Roundtable Review Editor: environment Christopher F. Jones Kate Brown, Plutopia: Nuclear Families, Atomic Cities, and the Great Soviet and American Plutonium Disasters (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013) ISBN 978- 0199855766 Contents Introduction by Christopher F. Jones, Arizona State University 2 Comments by Paul Josephson, Colby College 4 Comments by Kristen Iversen, University of Cincinnati 7 Comments by Jacob Darwin Hamblin, Oregon State University 10 Author’s Response by Kate Brown, University of Maryland, Baltimore County 14 About the Contributors 21 Copyright © 2014 H-Net: Humanities and Social Sciences Online H-Net permits the redistribution and reprinting of this work for nonprofit, educational purposes, with full and accurate attribution to the author, web location, date of publication, H-Environment, and H-Net: Humanities & Social Sciences Online. H-Environment Roundtable Reviews, Vol. 4, No.9 (2014) 2 Introduction by Christopher F. Jones, Arizona State University he Cold War can be described as a period of opposites: capitalist versus communist; open versus closed; West versus East. While the United States Tand Soviet Union were, of course, two sides of the same coin in a global pursuit of power, their differences typically attract much more attention than their similarities. This is true of most historical accounts, and it is true of many historical actors as well. Leading figures in the United States and Soviet Union often proclaimed the distinctions between the superpowers as they sought legitimation for their actions from their citizens and the international community.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Manual for Survival by Kate Brown - Atmospheric Contamination with Ruthenium-106 Detected in Europe in to Cite This Article: Jim Smith 2020 J
    Journal of Radiological Protection OPINION ARTICLE • OPEN ACCESS Recent citations Review of Manual for Survival by Kate Brown - Atmospheric contamination with ruthenium-106 detected in Europe in To cite this article: Jim Smith 2020 J. Radiol. Prot. 40 337 Autumn 2017 Richard Wakeford View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 148.197.86.4 on 02/04/2020 at 09:33 | Society for Radiological Protection Journal of Radiological Protection J. Radiol. Prot. 40 (2020) 337–348 (12pp) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ab17f2 Opinion Article Review of Manual for Survival by Kate Brown Jim Smith School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Burnaby Building, Burnaby Road, Portsmouth, PO1 3QL, United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] My review, based on nearly thirty years of research on Chernobyl and dozens of visits to the contaminated areas of Belarus, Ukraine and Russia, argues that Manual for Survival ignores the thousands of scientific studies on Chernobyl which are available in the international scientific literature. In doing so, it presents a biased and misleading account of the health and environmental effects of the accident. I believe that this book only perpetuates the many myths about the accident effects and has very little basis in sound science. Keywords: review, Chernobyl, health, radiation, radioactivity Manual for Survival is an interesting, but deeply flawed history of the health and environ- mental impacts of Chernobyl, the worst technological disaster in human history. It would be all too easy to dismiss it for its multiple omissions, inconsistencies and errors.
    [Show full text]