DOCSLIB.ORG

The Isolation and Characterization of a P. Angulosus Homeobox

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Isolation and Characterization of a P. Angulosus Homeobox THE ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A P. ANGULOSUS HOMEOBOX. Peter Lance Pfeffer Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR of PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Biochemistry,University Faculty ofof Science, Cape Town University of Cape Town. Cape Town, January 1991 . • The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town i CERTIFICATE OF SUPERVISOR In terms of paragraph eight of "General regulations for the degree of Ph.D.", I, as supervisor of the candidate P.L.Pfeffer, certify that I approve of the incorporation into this thesis of material that has already been published or submitted for publication. Professor C. von Holt Professor in the Department of Biochemistry and Director of the UCT-FRD Research Center for Molecular Biology. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank Professor Claus von Holt, my supervisor, for his excellent guidance, support and encouragement during the course of this thesis. Rob Warren for his helpful suggestions and many fruitful discussions. My colleagues in lab 402 for their moral support and joviality, making the lab a second home. Special thanks to Sylva Schwager and Madhu Chauhan. Dr. W.McGinnis for the kind donation of the Antennapedia homeobox-containing plasmid p903G. The Foundation for Research Development and the University of Cape Town Research Committee for their generous financial support. My wife Cynthia, my mother and my brother for their continual enthusiasm and interest in my work. iii INDEX THE ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A SEA URCHIN HOMEOBOX CONTENTS Certificate of supervisor .................................. i Acknowledgements ......................................... :~~ Index . ................................................... 11..1 Summary . .................................................. vi Abbreviations ............................................ vii CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW THE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF HOMEOBOXES 1.1 Historical perspective ................................. 1 1. 2 Classes of Homeoboxes .................................. 2 1.3 Structure of the homeodomain ........................... 5 1. 4 Binding studies ........................................ 6 1.5 Structural features of Homeodomain-proteins ........... 11 1.6 The function of homeodomain proteins .................. 13 1.6.1 Experimental approaches ........................ 13 1.6.2 Transcription factors .......................... 14 1. 6. 3 Conclusions .................................... 21 1.7 Homeobox genes and Development ........................ 24 1. 7 .1 Drosophila ..................................... 25 1.7.1.1 Early embryogenesis ..................... 25 1.7.1.2 The bicoid protein gradient ............. 25 1.7.1.3 The segmented subdivision of the embryo.27 1.7.1.4 The homeotic genes ...................... 30 1.7.1.5 Interpretations ......................... 32 1.7.1.6 Later embryogenesis ..................... 33 1. 7. 2 Vertebrates .................................... 34 1 . 7 . 3 Echinoderms .................................... 3 9 1. 7. 4 Nematodes ...................................... 40 CHAPTER 2: THE ISOLATION OF A SEA URCHIN HOMEOBOX 2.1 Library construction ................................. 42 2.2 Ligation ............................................. 44 2. 3 Library evaluation ................................... 45 2. 4 Screening . ........................................... 4 6 2. 5 Characterization . .................................... 4 7 2. 6 Subcloning ........................................... 5 O iv CHAPTER 3: SEQUENCE CHARACTERIZATION 3 • 1 Method ............................................... 51 3.1.1. Sequencing strategy ........................... 52 3.2 Results and Discussion ................................ 53 CHAPTER 4: RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM 4.1. Restriction fragments ............................... 57 4. 2. Copy number ......................................... 58 4.3. Degree of polymorphism .............................. 59 4.3.1 Statistical method for predicting the frequency of restriction fragments ............ 60 4.3.2 Comparing predicted and observed polymorphism.62 CHAPTER 5: EXPRESSION 5. 1 RNA dot blots ........................................ 64 5. 2 RNAase ti tra tions .................................... 6 5 5 . 3 RNAase mapping . ...................................... 6 7 5 . 4 Northern blots .................................... : .. 7 0 5. 5 Discussion ........................................... 71 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION ............................... .... 7 2 CHAPTER 7: METHODS AND MATERIALS 7.1 Sea urchins 7 .1. 1. Embryos ....................................... 7 5 7 .1. 2 Adult tissues .................................. 75 7.2 Nucleic acid isolation 7. 2 .1 Genomic DNA .................................... 76 7.2.2 Plasmid DNA .................................... 76 7 . 2 . 3 Lambda DNA . 7 6 7 . 2 . 4 Total RNA . ..................................... 7 6 7.2.5 Poly A+ RNA .................................... 77 7. 2. 6 RNA content of embryo .......................... 7 7 7.3 Sea urchin genomic library 7. 3. 1 Vector and Host ................................ 7 8 7.3.2 Ligation ....................................... 78 7. 3. 3 Packaging ...................................... 78 7. 3. 4 Titration ...................................... 79 7.3.5 Amplification .................................. 79 7. 3. 6 Screening . ..................................... 80 7.4 Microbial techniques 7. 4 .1 Competent cells ................................ 80 7. 4. 2 Transformation ................................. 81 Index V 7.5 Nucleic acid manipulation 7.5.1 DNA Enzymatic manipulation ..................... 81 7.5.1.1 Restriction enzymes ..................... 81 7.5.1.2 Klenow fragment ......................... 82 7.5.1.3 Nick translations ....................... 82 7. 5. 1. 4 Ligations ............................... 83 7.5.1.5 Dephosphorylations ...................... 83 7.5.2 RNA Manipulations .............................. 83 7. 5. 2 .1 RNAases ................................. 83 7. 5. 2. 2 Transcriptions .......................... 84 7.5.2.3 Glyoxal denaturation .................... 85 7.5.3 General nucleic acid manipulations ............. 85 7.5.3.1 Ethanol precipitation ................... 85 7. 5. 3. 2 Spin columns ............................ 86 7.5.3.3 Concentration determinations ............ 86 7.5.3.4 Gel electrophoretic purification . ........................... 86 7.5.3.5 TCA precipitation ....................... 86 7.5.3.6 Sucrose gradient size fractionation ..... 87 7.6 Electrophoresis 7.6.1 Agarose ........................................ 87 7.6.2 Non-denaturing acrylamide ...................... 88 7.6.3 Denaturing acrylamide RNA gels ................. 88 7. 6. 4 Sequencing gels ................................ 88 7.7 Nucleic acid transfer and hybridization 7. 7 .1 Southern blots ................................. 89 7 • 7 • 2 Northern blots ................................. 8 9 7 . 7 . 3 RNA Dot blots .................................. 9 O 7. 7. 4 Hybridization .................................. 90 7.8 RN.Aase titration and mapping .......................... 91 7.9 Photographic techniques 7. 9. 1 Photography . ................................... 9 2 7 . 9. 2 Autoradiography ................................ 9 2 7.9.3 Microdensitometer scanning ..................... 92 CHAPTER 8 : REFERENCES ................................... 9 3 Index vi SUMMARY THE ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A P.ANGULOSUS HOMEOBOX The aim of this thesis was to isolate and characterize a homeobox-containing gene of the South African sea urchin Parechinus angulosus. This was achieved by constructing a genomic library of several individuals and screening this library using a probe containing the Antennapedia homeobox. Eight clones were isolated and shown to represent different alleles of the same gene. One clone was sequenced, revealing a homeobox which was termed PaHboxl. This homeobox was compared to published homeobox sequences and shown to be a member of the Antp (Hoxl.l) subclass (table 1.1). A splice donor site was identified 23 bp upstream of the homeobox and the observation confirmed by RNAase mapping. PaHboxl is situated in a genomic area showing a significantly higher degree of restriction fragment polymorphism than expected. This was shown by a statistical analysis which should be of general value in the interpretation of such polymorphisms. The expression of PaHboxl was examined by RNAase protection assays and Northern blotting. Two distinct phases of expression were observed - during embryogenesis PaHboxl is expressed transiently at low levels in 11,5 hr mesenchyme blastula stage embryos (44 ± 8 transcripts per embryo) with levels 3-5 fold lower 2,5 hr before and after this stage. Expression is observed again at up to 160 fold higher levels in the adult with maximal expression in testis (11 transcripts per 10 pg total RNA), and increasingly lower levels in intestines, ovary and Aristotle's lantern. Two transcripts of size 5,2 and 5,7 kbp were observed. Expression in Aristotle's lantern and embryonic stages could not be detected by Northern analysis. vii ABBREVIATIONS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification and Characterization of TPRKB Dependency in TP53 Deficient Cancers
    Identification and Characterization of TPRKB Dependency in TP53 Deficient Cancers. by Kelly Kennaley A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Molecular and Cellular Pathology) in the University of Michigan 2019 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Zaneta Nikolovska-Coleska, Co-Chair Adjunct Associate Professor Scott A. Tomlins, Co-Chair Associate Professor Eric R. Fearon Associate Professor Alexey I. Nesvizhskii Kelly R. Kennaley [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2439-9020 © Kelly R. Kennaley 2019 Acknowledgements I have immeasurable gratitude for the unwavering support and guidance I received throughout my dissertation. First and foremost, I would like to thank my thesis advisor and mentor Dr. Scott Tomlins for entrusting me with a challenging, interesting, and impactful project. He taught me how to drive a project forward through set-backs, ask the important questions, and always consider the impact of my work. I’m truly appreciative for his commitment to ensuring that I would get the most from my graduate education. I am also grateful to the many members of the Tomlins lab that made it the supportive, collaborative, and educational environment that it was. I would like to give special thanks to those I’ve worked closely with on this project, particularly Dr. Moloy Goswami for his mentorship, Lei Lucy Wang, Dr. Sumin Han, and undergraduate students Bhavneet Singh, Travis Weiss, and Myles Barlow. I am also grateful for the support of my thesis committee, Dr. Eric Fearon, Dr. Alexey Nesvizhskii, and my co-mentor Dr. Zaneta Nikolovska-Coleska, who have offered guidance and critical evaluation since project inception.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information
    Supporting Information Figure S1. The functionality of the tagged Arp6 and Swr1 was confirmed by monitoring cell growth and sensitivity to hydeoxyurea (HU). Five-fold serial dilutions of each strain were plated on YPD with or without 50 mM HU and incubated at 30°C or 37°C for 3 days. Figure S2. Localization of Arp6 and Swr1 on chromosome 3. The binding of Arp6-FLAG (top), Swr1-FLAG (middle), and Arp6-FLAG in swr1 cells (bottom) are compared. The position of Tel 3L, Tel 3R, CEN3, and the RP gene are shown under the panels. Figure S3. Localization of Arp6 and Swr1 on chromosome 4. The binding of Arp6-FLAG (top), Swr1-FLAG (middle), and Arp6-FLAG in swr1 cells (bottom) in the whole chromosome region are compared. The position of Tel 4L, Tel 4R, CEN4, SWR1, and RP genes are shown under the panels. Figure S4. Localization of Arp6 and Swr1 on the region including the SWR1 gene of chromosome 4. The binding of Arp6- FLAG (top), Swr1-FLAG (middle), and Arp6-FLAG in swr1 cells (bottom) are compared. The position and orientation of the SWR1 gene is shown. Figure S5. Localization of Arp6 and Swr1 on chromosome 5. The binding of Arp6-FLAG (top), Swr1-FLAG (middle), and Arp6-FLAG in swr1 cells (bottom) are compared. The position of Tel 5L, Tel 5R, CEN5, and the RP genes are shown under the panels. Figure S6. Preferential localization of Arp6 and Swr1 in the 5′ end of genes. Vertical bars represent the binding ratio of proteins in each locus.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Protein Interaction Networks of the Intrinsically Disordered Transcription Factor C(%3$
    Spatial protein interaction networks of the intrinsically disordered transcription factor C(%3$ Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) im Fach Biologie/Molekularbiologie eingereicht an der Lebenswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Von Evelyn Ramberger, M.Sc. Präsidentin der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr.-Ing.Dr. Sabine Kunst Dekan der Lebenswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr. Bernhard Grimm Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Achim Leutz 2. Prof. Dr. Matthias Selbach 3. Prof. Dr. Gunnar Dittmar Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 12.8.2020 For T. Table of Contents Selbstständigkeitserklärung ....................................................................................1 List of Figures ............................................................................................................2 List of Tables ..............................................................................................................3 Abbreviations .............................................................................................................4 Zusammenfassung ....................................................................................................6 Summary ....................................................................................................................7 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................8 1.1. Disordered proteins
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Cat-1 Gene Transcription During Physiological
    REGULATION OF CAT-1 GENE TRANSCRIPTION DURING PHYSIOLOGICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS by CHARLIE HUANG Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Maria Hatzoglou Department of Nutrition CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY MAY 2010 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of _____________________________________________________ candidate for the ______________________degree *. (signed)_______________________________________________ (chair of the committee) ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ (date) _______________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. This workis dedicated to my parents (DICK and MEI-HUI), brother (STEVE), and sister (ANGELA) for their love and support during my graduate study. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication iii Table of Contents iv List of Tables vii List of Figures viii Acknowledgements ix List of Abbreviations xi Abstract xv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Amino acids and amino acid transporters 1 System y+ transporters 2 Physiological significance of Cat-1 6 Gene transcription in eukaryotic cells 7 Cat-1 gene structure 10 Regulation of Cat-1 expression 11 The Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) and Cat-1 expression 14
    [Show full text]
  • SUMO and Transcriptional Regulation: the Lessons of Large-Scale Proteomic, Modifomic and Genomic Studies
    molecules Review SUMO and Transcriptional Regulation: The Lessons of Large-Scale Proteomic, Modifomic and Genomic Studies Mathias Boulanger 1,2 , Mehuli Chakraborty 1,2, Denis Tempé 1,2, Marc Piechaczyk 1,2,* and Guillaume Bossis 1,2,* 1 Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier (IGMM), University of Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France; [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (D.T.) 2 Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Paris, France * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.P.); [email protected] (G.B.) Abstract: One major role of the eukaryotic peptidic post-translational modifier SUMO in the cell is transcriptional control. This occurs via modification of virtually all classes of transcriptional actors, which include transcription factors, transcriptional coregulators, diverse chromatin components, as well as Pol I-, Pol II- and Pol III transcriptional machineries and their regulators. For many years, the role of SUMOylation has essentially been studied on individual proteins, or small groups of proteins, principally dealing with Pol II-mediated transcription. This provided only a fragmentary view of how SUMOylation controls transcription. The recent advent of large-scale proteomic, modifomic and genomic studies has however considerably refined our perception of the part played by SUMO in gene expression control. We review here these developments and the new concepts they are at the origin of, together with the limitations of our knowledge. How they illuminate the SUMO-dependent Citation: Boulanger, M.; transcriptional mechanisms that have been characterized thus far and how they impact our view of Chakraborty, M.; Tempé, D.; SUMO-dependent chromatin organization are also considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Dimorphism in Diverse Metazoans Is Regulated by a Novel Class of Intertwined Zinc Fingers
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 4, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Sexual dimorphism in diverse metazoans is regulated by a novel class of intertwined zinc fingers Lingyang Zhu,1,4 Jill Wilken,2 Nelson B. Phillips,3 Umadevi Narendra,3 Ging Chan,1 Stephen M. Stratton,2 Stephen B. Kent,2 and Michael A. Weiss1,3–5 1Center for Molecular Oncology, Departments of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology and Chemistry, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637-5419 USA; 2Gryphon Sciences, South San Francisco, California 94080 USA; 3Department of Biochemistry, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4935 USA Sex determination is regulated by diverse pathways. Although upstream signals vary, a cysteine-rich DNA-binding domain (the DM motif) is conserved within downstream transcription factors of Drosophila melanogaster (Doublesex) and Caenorhabditis elegans (MAB-3). Vertebrate DM genes have likewise been identified and, remarkably, are associated with human sex reversal (46, XY gonadal dysgenesis). Here we demonstrate that the structure of the Doublesex domain contains a novel zinc module and disordered tail. The module consists of intertwined CCHC and HCCC Zn2+-binding sites; the tail functions as a nascent recognition ␣-helix. Mutations in either Zn2+-binding site or tail can lead to an intersex phenotype. The motif binds in the DNA minor groove without sharp DNA bending. These molecular features, unusual among zinc fingers and zinc modules, underlie the organization of a Drosophila enhancer that integrates sex- and tissue-specific signals. The structure provides a foundation for analysis of DM mutations affecting sexual dimorphism and courtship behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO the Role of Nonsense
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The Role of Nonsense-mediated RNA Decay in Arsenic Toxicity A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Neurosciences by Alexandra E. Goetz Committee in Charge: Professor Miles Wilkinson, Chair Professor Nicola Allen Professor Jonathan Lin Professor Jens Lykke-Andersen Professor Pamela Mellon 2018 Signature Page The Dissertation of Alexandra E. Goetz is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2018 iii DEDICATION Dedication This work would not have been possible without the support of my family members- my mother, my father, and my brother Matt. Their support to follow my passions, even when the going got tough, helped me finish graduate school, lab change and all. I also want to dedicate this to my husband, Nadav, who was the best shoulder to cry on, cheerleader, and partner to celebrate with through graduate school. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Signature Page .......................................................................................................................... iii Dedication .................................................................................................................................. iv Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................ v List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Gcn4p in Nutrient-Controlled Gene Expression in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
    Role of Gcn4p in nutrient-controlled gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultäten der Georg-August-Universität vorgelegt von Olav Grundmann aus Göttingen Göttingen 2001 D7 Referent: Prof. Dr. G. H. Braus Korreferent: Prof. Dr. F. Mayer Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 27.Juni.2001 Table of Contents I Table of Contents Summary................................................................................................................ 1 Zusammenfassung.............................................................................................. 3 Chapter I: Introduction.......................................................................................................... 5 Regulation of morphology of the bakers’ yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in dependence on the nutritional conditions.............................................................. 5 Life cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.............................................................. 5 Pseudohyphal growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae......................................... 6 Environmental stimuli and sensing systems..................................................... 7 Signaling pathways............................................................................................. 8 FLO11 is indispensable for filamentous growth.............................................. 11 Why studying pseudohyphal development in Saccharomyces cerevisiae?.... 12 Regulation of amino acid biosynthesis
    [Show full text]
  • The LRF Transcription Factor Regulates Mature B Cell Development and the Germinal Center Response in Mice
    The LRF transcription factor regulates mature B cell development and the germinal center response in mice Nagisa Sakurai, … , Ravi Bhatia, Takahiro Maeda J Clin Invest. 2011;121(7):2583-2598. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI45682. Research Article Immunology B cells play a central role in immune system function. Deregulation of normal B cell maturation can lead to the development of autoimmune syndromes as well as B cell malignancies. Elucidation of the molecular features of normal B cell development is important for the development of new target therapies for autoimmune diseases and B cell malignancies. Employing B cell–specific conditional knockout mice, we have demonstrated here that the transcription factor leukemia/lymphoma-related factor (LRF) forms an obligate dimer in B cells and regulates mature B cell lineage fate and humoral immune responses via distinctive mechanisms. Moreover, LRF inactivation in transformed B cells attenuated their growth rate. These studies identify what we believe to be a new key factor for mature B cell development and provide a rationale for targeting LRF dimers for the treatment of autoimmune diseases and B cell malignancies. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/45682/pdf Research article The LRF transcription factor regulates mature B cell development and the germinal center response in mice Nagisa Sakurai,1 Manami Maeda,1 Sung-Uk Lee,1 Yuichi Ishikawa,1 Min Li,2 John C. Williams,3 Lisheng Wang,1 Leila Su,3 Mai Suzuki,1 Toshiki I. Saito,4 Shigeru Chiba,5 Stefano Casola,6 Hideo Yagita,7 Julie Teruya-Feldstein,8 Shinobu Tsuzuki,9 Ravi Bhatia,1 and Takahiro Maeda1 1Division of Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Leukemia Research, 2Department of Information Sciences, and 3Department of Molecular Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Dimerization of Paired Class Homeo Domains on DNA
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cooperative dimerization of Paired class homeo domains on DNA David Wilson, Guojun Sheng, Thomas Lecuit, Nathalie Dostatni, and Claude Desplan Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021-6399 USA Homeo domain-containing proteins mediate many transcriptional processes in eukaryotes. Because nearly all animal homeo proteins are believed to bind to short, highly related DNA sequences, the basis for their high specificity of action is not understood. We show that cooperative dimerization on palindromic DNA sequences can provide increased specificity to one of the three major classes of homeo domains, the Paired/Pax class. The 60-amino-acid homeo domains from this class contain sufficient information to bind cooperatively as homo- and heterodimers to palindromic DNA sequences; that is, the binding of one homeo domain molecule can increase the affinity of a second molecule by up to 300-fold. Different members of the Paired (Prd) class of homeo domains prefer different spacings between half-sites, as determined by the ninth amino acid residue of the recognition helix. In addition, this residue determines the identity of the base pairs at the center of the palindromic sites, as well as the magnitude of the cooperative interaction. The cooperative dimerization of homeo domains in the Prd class distinguishes them from other classes, whereas binding-site configuration and sequence specificity allow for distinctions within this class. [Key Words: Cooperativity; dimerization; DNA binding; homeo domain; recognition helix; transcription] Received July 9, 1993; revised version accepted August 26, 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutations in the Glucocorticoid Receptor Zinc Finger Region That Distinguish Interdigitated DNA Binding and Transcriptional Enhancement Activities
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 5, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Mutations in the glucocorticoid receptor zinc finger region that distinguish interdigitated DNA binding and transcriptional enhancement activities Mark Schena^ Leonard P. Freedman, and Keith R. Yamamoto Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University at Cahfomia-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0448 USA Mammalian glucocorticoid receptors bind specifically to glucocorticoid response element (GRE) DNA sequences and enhance transcription from GRE-linked promoters in mammalian cells and in yeast. We randomly mutagenized a segment of the receptor encompassing sequences responsible for DNA-binding and transcriptional regulation and screened in yeast for receptor defects. The mutations all mapped to a 66-amino- acid subregion that includes two zinc fingers; in general parallel phenotypes were observed in yeast and animal cells. Mutants defective for DNA binding also failed either to enhance or to repress transcription. However, several mutations in the second finger selectively impaired enhancement; we suggest that such 'positive control' mutants may alter protein-protein contacts required for transcriptional activation. [Key Words: GRE; zinc finger domain; DNA binding; transcription] Received July 5, 1989; revised version accepted August 14, 1989. In the presence of bound hormone, the glucocorticoid trahedrally by four cysteine sulfur atoms, and that metal receptor protein regulates transcription initiation from coordination is essential for proper folding and DNA specific animal cell promoters used by RNA polymerase binding. In addition, a 28-amino-acid subfragment has II. The receptor enhances transcription by associating been identified, which lies downstream of the fingers, selectively with DNA sequences termed glucocorticoid that exhibits nuclear localization activity but fails to response elements (GREs) (Chandler et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Transcription Factor Function As a Mechanism for Changing Metazoan Developmental Gene Regulatory Networks Alys M Cheatle Jarvela and Veronica F Hinman*
    Cheatle Jarvela and Hinman EvoDevo 2015, 6:3 http://www.evodevojournal.com/content/6/1/3 REVIEW Open Access Evolution of transcription factor function as a mechanism for changing metazoan developmental gene regulatory networks Alys M Cheatle Jarvela and Veronica F Hinman* Abstract The form that an animal takes during development is directed by gene regulatory networks (GRNs). Developmental GRNs interpret maternally deposited molecules and externally supplied signals to direct cell-fate decisions, which ultimately leads to the arrangements of organs and tissues in the organism. Genetically encoded modifications to these networks have generated the wide range of metazoan diversity that exists today. Most studies of GRN evolution focus on changes to cis-regulatory DNA, and it was historically theorized that changes to the transcription factors that bind to these cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) contribute to this process only rarely. A growing body of evidence suggests that changes to the coding regions of transcription factors play a much larger role in the evolution of developmental gene regulatory networks than originally imagined. Just as cis-regulatory changes make use of modular binding site composition and tissue-specific modules to avoid pleiotropy, transcription factor coding regions also predominantly evolve in ways that limit the context of functional effects. Here, we review the recent works that have led to this unexpected change in the field of Evolution and Development (Evo-Devo) and consider the implications these studies have had on our understanding of the evolution of developmental processes. Keywords: Transcription factor, Gene regulatory network, Development, Novelty Introduction have historically been considered the dominant source of Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) explain the gene GRN evolution, and this idea continues to be supported by expression states that direct a cell to establish a particular new data in the genomics era (reviewed in [2-4]).
    [Show full text]