DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Electric Fencing of Maasai Mau Forest- Narok County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Electric Fencing of Maasai Mau Forest- Narok County PROPOSED ELECTRIC FENCING OF MAASAI MAU FOREST- NAROK COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT Prepared and submitted by: DECEMBER, 2019 December, 2019 CERTIFICATION Proponent: Kenya Water Towers Agency Assignment: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED ELECTRIC FENCING OF MAASAI MAU FOREST - NAROK COUNTY Name and Address of Firm of Experts: P. O. Box 9882 - 00100 Nairobi, Kenya Tel. 254 020 2248762 Registration No. of Firm of Experts: 0181 Signed: ____________________________ Date: _____________________ Isaiah B. Kegora Lead EIA/EA Expert (NEMA Reg. No 1893) For: Norken (I) Ltd Name and Address of Proponent: Kenya Water Towers Agency NHIF Building, 15th Floor, P.O. BOX 42903 - 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Signed: ____________________________ Date: _____________________ For KWTA------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ESIA Study for the Proposed Electric Fencing of Maasai Mau Forest 2 December, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATION ................................................................................................................................. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures ....................................................................................................................................... 8 List of Tables ......................................................................................................................................... 9 List of Plates ........................................................................................................................................ 10 ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................................................... 12 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 14 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 23 1.1 Project background ............................................................................................................ 23 1.2 Project Justification ............................................................................................................ 23 1.3 Scope and Objectives of the ESIA Study ......................................................................... 23 1.4 The ESIA Process ................................................................................................................ 24 1.5 ESIA Study Methodology ................................................................................................. 25 1.6 Study Team ......................................................................................................................... 26 1.7 Structure of This Report .................................................................................................... 27 2 : PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................... 28 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 28 2.2 Project Location .................................................................................................................. 28 2.3 Project Components ........................................................................................................... 29 Design .......................................................................................................................... 29 Construction Materials .............................................................................................. 31 Construction Phase .................................................................................................... 33 Operation and Maintenance Phase .......................................................................... 34 Decommissioning Phase ........................................................................................... 35 2.4 Project Alternatives ............................................................................................................ 35 3 : LEGAL, POLICY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ........................................... 46 3.1 POLICY PROVISIONS ...................................................................................................... 46 Vision 2030 .................................................................................................................. 46 Session Paper No.10 of 2014 on the National Environment Policy, 2014 ........... 46 3.2 RELEVANT NATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK ....................................................... 47 Constitution of Kenya, 2010 ...................................................................................... 47 ESIA Study for the Proposed Electric Fencing of Maasai Mau Forest 3 December, 2019 Environmental Management and Coordination Act, 1999 (and the amendments of 2015) 48 Environmental Impact Assessment and Audit regulations, 2003 and the 2016 amendments ............................................................................................................................... 49 EMCA (Conservation of Biological Diversity and Resources, Access to Genetic Resource and Benefits Sharing) Regulation, 2006 ................................................................. 50 EMCA (Waste Management) Regulations 2006 ..................................................... 51 Noise and Excessive Vibration Regulations ........................................................... 51 The Wildlife Coordination and Management Act, 2013 ....................................... 52 Occupational Health and Safety Act, 2007 ............................................................. 53 Employment Act, 2007 .............................................................................................. 53 Work Injury Benefits Act (WIBA) ............................................................................ 54 The Energy Act, 2019 ................................................................................................. 55 The Energy (Solar Photovoltaic Systems) Regulations, 2012 ............................... 55 The Public Health Act (Cap. 242) ............................................................................. 55 The Forest Management and Conservation Act, 2016 .......................................... 56 Environment and Land Court Act, 2011 ................................................................. 57 The Physical Planning Act, 1999 .............................................................................. 58 The Land Titles Act Cap 282 ..................................................................................... 58 The Penal Code, Cap 63............................................................................................. 59 The Water Act,2016 .................................................................................................... 59 4 BASELINE INFORMATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CONDITIONS . 60 4.1 Setting the Project Limits and Area of Influence ........................................................... 60 Area of Environmental Influence............................................................................. 60 Area of Social Influence ............................................................................................. 63 4.2 Physical Environment ....................................................................................................... 64 Topography ................................................................................................................. 64 Climate ......................................................................................................................... 64 Geology and soils ....................................................................................................... 64 Hydrology ................................................................................................................... 65 Air Quality .................................................................................................................. 65 Water Quality ............................................................................................................. 65 4.3 Ecological Baseline ............................................................................................................. 65 Ecological Survey Approach .................................................................................... 65 ESIA Study for the Proposed Electric Fencing of Maasai Mau Forest 4 December, 2019 Sampling Framework ................................................................................................ 66 Field Study .................................................................................................................. 67 Water quality parameters: ........................................................................................ 71 Soil Variable Analysis ................................................................................................ 72 Local accounts of species ........................................................................................... 73 Biodiversity field survey ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Importance of Livelihood Strategy and Ethnicity
    Ecosystem Services 40 (2019) 101000 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ecosystem Services journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecoser The importance of livelihood strategy and ethnicity in forest ecosystem T services’ perceptions by local communities in north-western Cameroon ⁎ Aida Cuni-Sancheza,b, , Alain Senghor K. Ngutec, Bonaventure Sonkéd, Moses Nsanyi Saingee, Neil D. Burgessf,g, Julia A. Kleinb, Rob Marchanta a York Institute for Tropical Ecosystems, Department of Environment and Geography, Wentworth Way, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NG, UK b Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Campus Delivery 1476, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA c Applied Biology and Ecology Research Unit, Dschang School of Sciences and Technology, University of Dschang, Cameroon d Plant Systematic and Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Higher Teachers’ Training College, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon e Tropical Plant Exploration Group (TroPEG) Cameroon, P.O. Box 18, Mundemba, Cameroon f Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark g UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Center (UNEP-WCMC), 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, UK ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Human culture has an important influence on how forests are utilised, yet its influence on ecosystem service(ES) Socio-cultural assessment use and valuation remains underexplored. We address this gap by investigating how livelihood strategy and Montane forests ethnicity affect local peoples’ perceptions of forest ES in Cameroon. Data were collected through 20focus-group Place attachment discussions in villages of farmers (Oku and Banso) and pastoralists (Fulani) in two mountains. Forest use Pastoralists identified fewer ES than farmers, and used some ES differently (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Morphology of the Male Genitalia in Lepidoptera
    COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE MALE GENITALIA IN LEPIDOPTERA. By DEV RAJ MEHTA, M. Sc.~ Ph. D. (Canta.b.), 'Univefsity Scholar of the Government of the Punjab, India (Department of Zoology, University of Oambridge). CONTENTS. PAGE. Introduction 197 Historical Review 199 Technique. 201 N ontenclature 201 Function • 205 Comparative Morphology 206 Conclusions in Phylogeny 257 Summary 261 Literature 1 262 INTRODUCTION. In the domains of both Morphology and Taxonomy the study' of Insect genitalia has evoked considerable interest during the past half century. Zander (1900, 1901, 1903) suggested a common structural plan for the genitalia in various orders of insects. This work stimulated further research and his conclusions were amplified by Crampton (1920) who homologized the different parts in the genitalia of Hymenoptera, Mecoptera, Neuroptera, Diptera, Trichoptera Lepidoptera, Hemiptera and Strepsiptera with those of more generalized insects like the Ephe­ meroptera and Thysanura. During this time the use of genitalic charac­ ters for taxonomic purposes was also realized particularly in cases where the other imaginal characters had failed to serve. In this con­ nection may be mentioned the work of Buchanan White (1876), Gosse (1883), Bethune Baker (1914), Pierce (1909, 1914, 1922) and others. Also, a comparative account of the genitalia, as a basis for the phylo­ genetic study of different insect orders, was employed by Walker (1919), Sharp and Muir (1912), Singh-Pruthi (1925) and Cole (1927), in Orthop­ tera, Coleoptera, Hemiptera and the Diptera respectively. It is sur­ prising, work of this nature having been found so useful in these groups, that an important order like the Lepidoptera should have escaped careful analysis at the hands of the morphologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Versus Exotic Crotalaria Species (Fabaceae) As Host Plants of the Ornate Bella Moth, Utetheisa Ornatrix (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae) Andrei Sourakov*
    Journal of Natural History, 2015 Vol. 49, Nos. 39–40, 2397–2415, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2015.1006700 You are what you eat: native versus exotic Crotalaria species (Fabaceae) as host plants of the Ornate Bella Moth, Utetheisa ornatrix (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae) Andrei Sourakov* McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA (Received 9 April 2014; accepted 2 January 2015; first published online 3 March 2015) Crotalaria plants and Utetheisa ornatrix are closely linked to each other: the larvae destroy the seeds, while the moth depends on hostplants for alkaloids. To better understand the ongoing co-evolution, the present study examines how native hos- tplants compare to exotic ones. Leaf-feeding on Crotalaria pumila, C. rotundifolia,and C. incana,nativetothemoth’s range, led to faster larval development than on the exotic C. lanceolata, C. spectabilis,andC. pallida. Seed-feeding on all species of Crotalaria led to accelerated larval development and a resultant larger adult moth, and correlates with a higher nitrogen content in the plant tissues. These results add a novel dimension to the previous studies of reproductive biology of this model organ- ism. In controlled settings, mature larvae showed preference for leaves of C. spectabilis over those of other species, perhaps due to the higher alkaloid content. Differences in morphology and phenology of Crotalaria determine the ecology of U. ornatrix popu- lations in Florida. The introduction of novel hostplants, on which U. ornatrix can have a significant negative effect and which are of concern to humans as invasive toxic weeds, has greatly expanded the niche occupied by this moth.
    [Show full text]
  • (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae, Arctiinae) Палеарктики И
    Åâðàçèàòñêèé ýíòîìîë. æóðíàë 3(1): 1124 © EUROASIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2004 Îñíîâíûå ïóòè ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ è ñòàíîâëåíèÿ òàêñîíîìè÷åñêîãî ðàçíîîáðàçèÿ ìåäâåäèö (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae, Arctiinae) Ïàëåàðêòèêè è ñîïðåäåëüíûõ òåððèòîðèé Major distribution routes for the formation of tiger moth diversity in the Palaearctic and adjacent territories (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae, Arctiinae) Â.Â. Äóáàòîëîâ V.V. Dubatolov Ñèáèðñêèé çîîëîãè÷åñêèé ìóçåé Èíñòèòóòà ñèñòåìàòèêè è ýêîëîãèè æèâîòíûõ ÑÎ ÐÀÍ, óë. Ôðóíçå 11, Íîâîñèáèðñê 630091 Ðîññèÿ. E-mail: [email protected]. Siberian Zoological Museum, Institute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Frunze str. 11, Novosibirsk 630091 Russia. Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: ôàóíîãåíåç, Ïàëåàðêòèêà, Åâðàçèÿ, ìåäâåäèöû, Arctiidae, Arctiinae. Key words: faunogenesis, Palearctic, Eurasia, tiger moths, Arctiidae, Arctiinae. Ðåçþìå. Íà îñíîâå äàííûõ ïî èçìåíåíèþ ëàíä- ïîòîì ëåñàìè ñ ó÷àñòèåì øèðîêîëèñòâåííûõ ïî- øàôòîâ â íåîãåíå, ïëåéñòîöåíå è ãîëîöåíå, à òàêæå ðîä, îòñòóïèâøèìè äàëåêî íà þã âî âòîðîé ïîëîâè- èçó÷åíèÿ ñîâðåìåííîãî ðàñïðîñòðàíåíèÿ, ðåêîíñò- íå ïëèîöåíà, ê ýòîìó âðåìåíè ìîæíî ïðèâÿçàòü ðóèðîâàíû âåðîÿòíûå ïóòè ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ ìåäâå- èñ÷åçíîâåíèå êîíòàêòà ìåæäó íåìîðàëüíûìè ôàó- äèö Ïàëåàðêòèêè è ñîïðåäåëüíûõ òåððèòîðèé. Åñëè íàìè Ñåâåðíîé Àìåðèêè è Âîñòî÷íîé Àçèè, ïðè- äëÿ ïðåäïîëîæåíèÿ ãåíåçèñà ñîâðåìåííûõ âèäîâ âåäøåå ê îòñóòñòâèþ îáùèõ âèäîâ íà ýòèõ òåððèòî- ñëåäóåò èñïîëüçîâàòü òîëüêî äàííûå ïî ãîëîöåíó è ðèÿõ â íàñòîÿùåå âðåìÿ. Ïðîíèêíîâåíèå ÷åðåç âåðõíåìó ïëåéñòîöåíó, òî äëÿ âûÿâëåíèÿ ãåíåçèñà Áåðèíãèþ â îáîèõ íàïðàâëåíèÿõ àðêòè÷åñêèõ, áî- ðîäîâ è òðèá ñëåäóåò èñïîëüçîâàòü äàííûå ïî áî- ðåàëüíûõ è ÷àñòè÷íî òåìïåðàòíûõ ñîâðåìåííûõ ëåå äðåâíèì ýïîõàì íåîãåíó è êîíöó ïàëåîãåíà. âèäîâ íàèáîëåå âåðîÿòíî ïðîèñõîäèëî âî âðåìÿ îëå- Íà îñíîâå ñîâðåìåííûõ çíàíèé ïîêà íåâîçìîæíî äåíåíèé ïëåéñòîöåíà. Îáðàçîâàíèå òóíäðîâîé ôà- òî÷íî ïðåäïîëîæèòü ìåñòî âîçíèêíîâåíèÿ äàííîãî óíû íà÷àëîñü â ñâÿçè ñ ïåðâûì â êàéíîçîå âîçíèê- ïîäñåìåéñòâà, ðàñïðîñòðàí¸ííîãî âñåñâåòíî.
    [Show full text]
  • NUMBERED TREE SPECIES LIST in SOUTH AFRICA CYATHEACEAE 1 Cyathea Dregei 2 Cyathea Capensis Var. Capensis ZAMIACEAE 3 Encephalart
    NUMBERED TREE SPECIES LIST IN SOUTH AFRICA 23 Hyphaene coriacea CYATHEACEAE 24 Hyphaene petersiana 1 Cyathea dregei 25 Borassus aethiopum 2 Cyathea capensis var. capensis 26 Raphia australis 27 Jubaeopsis caffra ZAMIACEAE 3 Encephalartos altensteinii ASPHODELACEAE 3.1 Encephalartos eugene-maraisii 28 Aloe barberae 3.2 Encephalartos arenarius 28.1 Aloe arborescens 3.3 Encephalartos brevifoliolatus 28.2 Aloe africana 3.4 Encephalartos ferox 28.3 Aloe alooides 4 Encephalartos friderici-guilielmi 28.4 Aloe angelica 5 Encephalartos ghellinckii 28.5 Aloe candelabrum 5.1 Encephalartos inopinus 28.6 Aloe castanea 5.2 Encephalartos lanatus 28.7 Aloe comosa 6 Encephalartos laevifolius 28.8 Aloe excelsa var. excelsa 7 Encephalartos latifrons 29 Aloe dichotoma 8 Encephalartos senticosus 29.1 Aloe dolomitica 8.1 Encephalartos lehmannii 29.2 Aloe ferox 9 Encephalartos longifolius 29.3 Aloe khamiesensis 10 Encephalartos natalensis 29.4 Aloe littoralis 11 Encephalartos paucidentatus 29.5 Aloe marlothii subsp. marlothii 12 Encephalartos princeps 29.6 Aloe plicatilis 12.5 Encephalartos relictus 29.7 Aloe marlothii subsp. orientalis 13 Encephalartos transvenosus 30 Aloe pillansii 14 Encephalartos woodii 30.1 Aloe pluridens 14.1 Encephalartos heenanii 30.2 Aloe ramosissima 14.2 Encephalartos dyerianus 30.3 Aloe rupestris 14.3 Encephalartos middelburgensis 30.4 Aloe spicata 14.4 Encephalartos dolomiticus 30.5 Aloe speciosa 14.5 Encephalartos aemulans 30.6 Aloe spectabilis 14.6 Encephalartos hirsutus 30.7 Aloe thraskii 14.7 Encephalartos msinganus 14.8 Encephalartos
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One 1.0 Introduction and Background to The
    CHAPTER ONE 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY Loganiaceae is a family of flowering plants classified in the Order Gentianales (Bendre, 1975). The family was first suggested by Robert Brown in 1814 and validly published by von Martius in 1827 (Nicholas and Baijnath, 1994). Members habits are in form of trees, shrubs, woody climbers and herbs. Some are epiphytes while some members are furnished with spines or tendrils (Bendre, 1975). They are distributed mainly in the tropics, subtropics and a few in temperate regions (Backlund et al., 2000). Earlier treatments of the family have included up to 30 genera, 600 species (Leeuwenberg and Leenhouts, 1980; Mabberley, 1997) but were later reduced to 400 species in 15 genera, with some species extending into temperate Australia and North America (Struwe et al., 1994; Dunlop, 1996; Backlund and Bremer, 1998). Morphological studies have demonstrated that this broadly defined Loganiaceae was a polyphyletic assemblage and numerous genera have been removed from it to other families (sometimes to other Orders), e.g. Gentianaceae, Gelsemiaceae, Plocospermataceae, Tetrachondraceae, Buddlejaceae, and Gesneriaceae (Backlund and Bremer, 1998; Backlund et al., 2000). The family has undergone numerous revisions that have expanded and contracted its circumscription, ranging from one genus at its smallest (Takhtajan, 1997; Smith et al., 1997) to 30 at its largest (Leeuwenberg and Leenhouts, 1980). One of the current infrafamilial classifications contains four tribes: Antonieae Endl., Loganieae Endl., Spigelieae Dum. (monotypic), and Strychneae Dum. (Struwe et al., 1994). The tribes Loganieae and Antonieae are supported by molecular data, but Strychneae is not (Backlund et al., 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • SABONET Report No 18
    ii Quick Guide This book is divided into two sections: the first part provides descriptions of some common trees and shrubs of Botswana, and the second is the complete checklist. The scientific names of the families, genera, and species are arranged alphabetically. Vernacular names are also arranged alphabetically, starting with Setswana and followed by English. Setswana names are separated by a semi-colon from English names. A glossary at the end of the book defines botanical terms used in the text. Species that are listed in the Red Data List for Botswana are indicated by an ® preceding the name. The letters N, SW, and SE indicate the distribution of the species within Botswana according to the Flora zambesiaca geographical regions. Flora zambesiaca regions used in the checklist. Administrative District FZ geographical region Central District SE & N Chobe District N Ghanzi District SW Kgalagadi District SW Kgatleng District SE Kweneng District SW & SE Ngamiland District N North East District N South East District SE Southern District SW & SE N CHOBE DISTRICT NGAMILAND DISTRICT ZIMBABWE NAMIBIA NORTH EAST DISTRICT CENTRAL DISTRICT GHANZI DISTRICT KWENENG DISTRICT KGATLENG KGALAGADI DISTRICT DISTRICT SOUTHERN SOUTH EAST DISTRICT DISTRICT SOUTH AFRICA 0 Kilometres 400 i ii Trees of Botswana: names and distribution Moffat P. Setshogo & Fanie Venter iii Recommended citation format SETSHOGO, M.P. & VENTER, F. 2003. Trees of Botswana: names and distribution. Southern African Botanical Diversity Network Report No. 18. Pretoria. Produced by University of Botswana Herbarium Private Bag UB00704 Gaborone Tel: (267) 355 2602 Fax: (267) 318 5097 E-mail: [email protected] Published by Southern African Botanical Diversity Network (SABONET), c/o National Botanical Institute, Private Bag X101, 0001 Pretoria and University of Botswana Herbarium, Private Bag UB00704, Gaborone.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of the Lolldaiga Hills Conservation Landscape¹
    Insects of the Lolldaiga Hills Conservation Landscape¹ Family and scientific name² Common name² N³ L E J Threat Comments ODONATA DAMSELFLIES & DRAGONFLIES Aeshinidae Hawkers Anax imperator Blue emperor √ Gomphidae Clubtails Ictinogomphus ferox Common tigertail √ Libellulidea Perchers / Skimmers Brachythemis impartita Northern banded groundling √ Crocothemis erythraea Broad scarlet √ Orthetrum caffrum Two-striped skimmer √ Pantala flavescens Wandering glider √ MANTODEA MANTIDS Hymenopodidae Flower Mantids Phyllocrania paradoxa. Leaf mantid √ Pseudocreobotra wahlbergi Eyed-flower mantid √ Mantidae Common Mantids Sphodromantis gastrica Common green mantid / Giant mantid √ Tarachodes sp. Bark mantid √ Thespidae Hoplocoryphella sp. √ Empusidae Cone-headed Mantids Hemiempusa capensis Giant cone-headed mantid √ ORTHOPTERA GRASSHOPPERS & CRICKETS Gryllatalpidae Mole Crickets Gryllotalpa africana Mole cricket √ 1 Pyrgomorphidae Foam & Lubber Grasshoppers Phymateus viridipes Green milkweed locust √ Acrididae Short-horned Grasshoppers Acanthacris ruficornis Garden locust √ PHASMATODEA STICK INSECTS Phasmatidae Leptinia graminea Grass stick insect √ HEMIPTERA BUGS Pyrrhocoridae Cotton Stainers Dysdercus nigrofasciatus Cotton stainer √ AUCHENORRHYNCHA Cicadidae Cicadas Platypleura haglundi Orange-wing √ NEUROPTERA LACEWINGS & ANTLIONS Myrmeleontidae Antlions Cymothales spectabilis Tree-hole antlion √ Palpares sp. Dotted antlion √ COLEOPTERA BEETLES Carabidae Ground Beetles Cypholoba tenuicollis √ Tefflus kilimanus √ Staphylinidae Rove Beetles Paederus
    [Show full text]
  • Albany Thicket Biome
    % S % 19 (2006) Albany Thicket Biome 10 David B. Hoare, Ladislav Mucina, Michael C. Rutherford, Jan H.J. Vlok, Doug I.W. Euston-Brown, Anthony R. Palmer, Leslie W. Powrie, Richard G. Lechmere-Oertel, Şerban M. Procheş, Anthony P. Dold and Robert A. Ward Table of Contents 1 Introduction: Delimitation and Global Perspective 542 2 Major Vegetation Patterns 544 3 Ecology: Climate, Geology, Soils and Natural Processes 544 3.1 Climate 544 3.2 Geology and Soils 545 3.3 Natural Processes 546 4 Origins and Biogeography 547 4.1 Origins of the Albany Thicket Biome 547 4.2 Biogeography 548 5 Land Use History 548 6 Current Status, Threats and Actions 549 7 Further Research 550 8 Descriptions of Vegetation Units 550 9 Credits 565 10 References 565 List of Vegetation Units AT 1 Southern Cape Valley Thicket 550 AT 2 Gamka Thicket 551 AT 3 Groot Thicket 552 AT 4 Gamtoos Thicket 553 AT 5 Sundays Noorsveld 555 AT 6 Sundays Thicket 556 AT 7 Coega Bontveld 557 AT 8 Kowie Thicket 558 AT 9 Albany Coastal Belt 559 AT 10 Great Fish Noorsveld 560 AT 11 Great Fish Thicket 561 AT 12 Buffels Thicket 562 AT 13 Eastern Cape Escarpment Thicket 563 AT 14 Camdebo Escarpment Thicket 563 Figure 10.1 AT 8 Kowie Thicket: Kowie River meandering in the Waters Meeting Nature Reserve near Bathurst (Eastern Cape), surrounded by dense thickets dominated by succulent Euphorbia trees (on steep slopes and subkrantz positions) and by dry-forest habitats housing patches of FOz 6 Southern Coastal Forest lower down close to the river.
    [Show full text]
  • No Family Scientific Name Author and Year of Publication
    No Family Scientific Name Author and year of Publication 1 Bedelliidae Bedellia somnulentella | (Zeller, 1847) 2 Blastobasidae Blastobasis eridryas Meyrick, 1932 3 Blastobasis industria Meyrick, 1913 4 Bombycidae Racinoa signicosta (Strand, 1911) 5 Bombyx mori (Linnaeus, 1758) 6 Brahmaeidae Dactyloceras widenmanni (Karisch, 1895) 7 Dactyloceras richinii Berio, 1940 8 Carposinidae Carposina candace Meyrick, 1932 9 Choreutidae Brenthia leucatoma Meyrick, 1918 10 Choreutis argyrastra Meyrick, 1932 11 Cosmopterigidae Ascalenia secretifera Meyrick, 1932 12 Cosmopterix derrai Koster, 2016 13 Cosmopterix epismaragda Meyrick, 1932 14 Cosmopteri trilopha Meyrick, 1922 15 Cossidae Aethalopteryx obscurascens (Gaede, 1930) 16 Aethalopteryx simillima (Hampson, 1916) 17 Afroarabiella stroheli Yakovlev & Witt, 2016 18 Azygophleps boisduvalii (Herrich-Schäffer, 1854) 19 Azygophleps brehmi Yakovlev & Witt, 2016 20 Azygophleps inclusa (Walker, 1856) 21 Camellocossus abyssinica (Hampson, 1910) 22 Camellocossus henleyi (Warren & Rothschild, 1905) 23 Camellocossus lalibela Yakovlev & Witt, 2017 24 Camellocossus strohlei Yakovlev & Witt, 2017 25 Eulophonotus myrmeleon Felder, 1874 26 Macrocossus sidamo (Rougeot, 1977) 27 Oreocossus kilimanjarensis (Holland, 1892) 28 Oreocossus occidentalis Strand, 1913 29 Oreocossus ungemachi Rougeot, 1977 1 30 Strigocossus kushit Yakovlev, 2011 31 Strigocossus mediopallens (Fletcher, 1968) 32 Crambidae Achyra coelatalis (Walker,1859) 33 Adelpherupa aethiopicalis Maes, 2002 34 Adelpherupa elongalis Maes, 2002 35 Aethaloessa
    [Show full text]
  • THE LOGANIACEAE of AFRICA XIV a Revision of Nuxia Lam
    582.935.4:581.4/.S +581.9(6) MEDEDELINGEN LANDBOUWHOGESCHOOL WAGENINGEN • NEDERLAND • 75-8 (1975) THE LOGANIACEAE OF AFRICA XIV A revision ofNuxi a Lam. A. J. M. LEEUWENBERG Laboratory of Plant Taxonomy andPlant Geography, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands (Received 24-111-1975) Published 19-VIII197 5 INTRODUCTION The present publication is a revision on a monographic basis of the genus Nuxia. The genus is restricted to Africa where the present author had theop ­ portunity to study the most variable species, N. congesta, in the field in two dif­ ferent countries, viz. Cameroun and Ivory Coast. Fortunately most herbarium specimens proved to be well preserved and richly flowering or fruiting. HISTORY OF THE GENUS LA.MA.RCK (1791) founded the genus Nuxia on the basis of a single species, N.verticillata. PERSOON (1805) placed it in LINNAEUS'S Tetrandria monogynia, afterwards RAFINESQUE (1820) near Rondeletia in the Ixorineae of the Rubia- ceae, then REICHENBACH (1828) gave it a place in the Verbenaceae. Meanwhile R. BROWN (1814) named the second species N. congesta which was discovered in Ethiopia and was described only in 1838b y FRESENIUS. BENTHAM (1836) moved Nuxia to thetrib e Buddlejeae of the Scrophulariaceae and added some more species. Only one of them, however, N.floribunda, is maintained here in this genus. All the others belong to Buddleja according to, e.g., Miss I.C . VERDOORN (1958) andth epresen t author. BENTHAM was followed by MEISNER (1840), ENDLICHER (1841), REICHENBACH (1841), and KUNTH (1846), placing Nuxia there. Independently from BENTHAM, HOCHSTETTER (1843) described the new genus Lachnopylis in theLoganiaceae, based on two species, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe-Mozambique)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal PhytoKeys 145: 93–129 (2020) Plant checklist for the Bvumba Mountains 93 doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.145.49257 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://phytokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Mountains of the Mist: A first plant checklist for the Bvumba Mountains, Manica Highlands (Zimbabwe-Mozambique) Jonathan Timberlake1, Petra Ballings2,3, João de Deus Vidal Jr4, Bart Wursten2, Mark Hyde2, Anthony Mapaura4,5, Susan Childes6, Meg Coates Palgrave2, Vincent Ralph Clark4 1 Biodiversity Foundation for Africa, 30 Warren Lane, East Dean, E. Sussex, BN20 0EW, UK 2 Flora of Zimbabwe & Flora of Mozambique projects, 29 Harry Pichanick Drive, Alexandra Park, Harare, Zimbabwe 3 Meise Botanic Garden, Bouchout Domain, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860, Meise, Belgium 4 Afromontane Research Unit & Department of Geography, University of the Free State, Phuthaditjhaba, South Africa 5 National Her- barium of Zimbabwe, Box A889, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe 6 Box BW53 Borrowdale, Harare, Zimbabwe Corresponding author: Vincent Ralph Clark ([email protected]) Academic editor: R. Riina | Received 10 December 2019 | Accepted 18 February 2020 | Published 10 April 2020 Citation: Timberlake J, Ballings P, Vidal Jr JD, Wursten B, Hyde M, Mapaura A, Childes S, Palgrave MC, Clark VR (2020) Mountains of the Mist: A first plant checklist for the Bvumba Mountains, Manica Highlands (Zimbabwe- Mozambique). PhytoKeys 145: 93–129. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.145.49257 Abstract The first comprehensive plant checklist for the Bvumba massif, situated in the Manica Highlands along the Zimbabwe-Mozambique border, is presented. Although covering only 276 km2, the flora is rich with 1250 taxa (1127 native taxa and 123 naturalised introductions).
    [Show full text]