The Dilemma of the Black Intellectual
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
7KH'LOHPPDRIWKH%ODFN,QWHOOHFWXDO $XWKRU V &RUQHO:HVW 6RXUFH&XOWXUDO&ULWLTXH1R $XWXPQ SS 3XEOLVKHGE\8QLYHUVLW\RI0LQQHVRWD3UHVV 6WDEOH85/http://www.jstor.org/stable/1354283 $FFHVVHG Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=umnpress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of Minnesota Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Cultural Critique. http://www.jstor.org The Dilemma of the Black Intellectual CornelWest The peculiaritiesof the American social structure, and the position of the intellectualclass within it, make the functional role of the negro intellectuala special one. The negro intellectualmust deal intimatelywith the white power structureand culturalapparatus, and the inner realitiesof the black world at one and the same time. But in orderto functionsuccessfully in this role, he has to be acutely aware of the nature of the American social dynamic and how it monitors the ingredients of class stratificationsin American soci- ety.... Therefore the functional role of the negro intellectualdemands that he cannotbe absolutelysep- aratedfrom either the black or white world. Harold Cruse TheCrisis of the NegroIntellectual (1967) The contemporaryblack intellectual faces a grim predicament. Caughtbetween an insolentAmerican society and insouciantblack community, the Afro-Americanwho takes seriously the life of the mind inhabitsan isolatedand insulatedworld. This conditionhas little to do with the motivesand intentionsof blackintellectuals; rather it is an objectivesituation created by circumstancesnot of theirown choos- ing. In this meditativeessay, I will explore this dilemma of the black 109 110 CornelWest intellectualand suggestvarious ways of understandingand transform- ing it. On BecomingA BlackIntellectual The choice of becoming a blackintellectual is an act of self-imposed marginality;it assuresa peripheralstatus in and to the blackcommuni- ty. The quest for literacy indeed is a fundamental theme in Afro- Americanhistory and a basic impulse in the black community. But for blacks,as with most Americans,the uses for literacyare usuallyper- ceived to be for more substantivepecuniary benefits than those of the writer,artist, teacher, or professor.The reasons some black people choose to become serious intellectualsare diverse. But in most cases these reasonscan be tracedback to a common root:a conversion-like experiencewith a highlyinfluential teacher or peer thatconvinced one to dedicateone's life to the activitiesof reading,writing, and convers- ing for the purposesof individualpleasure, personal worth, and politi- cal enhancementof black (and often other oppressed)people. The way in which one becomes a black intellectualis highly prob- lematic. This is so because the traditionalroads others travelto be- come intellectualsin Americansociety have only recentlybeen opened - and remainquite difficult.The main avenuesare the academyor the literatesubcultures of art,culture, and politics.Prior to the acceptance of blackundergraduate students to elitewhite universities and colleges in the late sixties,select black educational institutions served as the ini- tial stimulusfor potentialblack intellectuals. And in all honesty, there wererelatively more and betterblack intellectuals then thannow. After a decent grounding in a black college, where self-worthand self- confidencewere affirmed,bright black studentsthen matriculatedto leadingwhite institutionsto be trainedby liberalsympathetic scholars often of renowned stature.Stellar figures such as W.E.B. DuBois, E. FranklinFrazier, and John Hope Franklinwere products of this sys- tem. For those black intellectuals-to-bewho missed college oppor- tunitiesfor financialor personalreasons, there were literate subcultures - especially in the large urban centers - of writers,painters, musicians, and politicos for unconventional educational enhancement. Major personagessuch as RichardWright, Ralph Ellison, andJames Baldwin were products of this process. Ironically,the presentday academyand contemporaryliterate sub- culturespresent more obstaclesfor young blacksthan those in decades The BlackIntellectual 111 past. This is so for three basic reasons. First, the attitudes of white scholarsin the academyare quite differentthan those in the past. It is much more difficultfor black students, especiallygraduate students, to be taken seriously as potentialscholars and intellectualsowing to the managerialethos of our universitiesand colleges (in which less time is spent with students)and to the vulgar (racist!)perceptions fueled by affirmativeaction programswhich pollute many black student-white professorrelations. Second, literatesubcultures are less open to blacks now than they werethree or four decadesago, not becausewhite avant-gardejournals or leftistgroups are more racisttoday but ratherbecause heated politi- cal and culturalissues, such as the legacy of the BlackPower Move- ment, the Israeli/Palestinianconflict, the invisibilityof Africain Amer- ican political discourse, have created rigid lines of demarcationand distancebetween blackand white intellectuals.Needless to say, black presencein leadingliberal journals like TheNew York Review ofBooks and TheNew YorkTimes Book Review is negligible - nearly non-existent. And more leftist periodicals such as Dissent,Socialist Review, The Nation, and Telos,or avant-garde scholarly ones like Diacritics,Salmagundi, Partisan Review,and Raritando not do much better. Only MonthlyReview, The MassachusettsReview, Boundary 2, and SocialText make persistent efforts to coverblack subject-matter and haveregular black contributors. The point here is not mere finger-pointingat negligentjournals (though it would not hurt matters!),but rather an attempt to highlight the raciallyseparatist publishing patterns and practicesof Americanintel- lectual life which are characteristicof the chasm between black and white intellectuals. Third, the generalpoliticization of Americanintellectual life (in the academyand outside),along with the rightwardideological drift, con- stitutesa hostile climatefor the makingof blackintellectuals. To some extent, this'has alwaysbeen so, but the ideological capitulationof a significantsegment of former left-liberals to the new style conser- vatismand old-styleimperialism has left blackstudents and blackpro- fessors with few allies in the academy and in influentialperiodicals. This hostile climate requires that black intellectualsfall back upon their own resources - institutions, journals, and periodicals - which, in turn, reinforcethe de facto raciallyseparatist practices of American intellectuallife. The tragedyof blackintellectual activity is thatthe blackinstitutional 112 CornelWest support for such activity is in shambles. The quantity and quality of black intellectual exchange is at its worst since the civil war. There is no major black academic journal; no major black intellectual magazine; no major black periodical of highbrow journalism; not even a major black newspaper of national scope. In short, the black infrastructure for intellectual discourse and dialogue is nearly non-existent. This tragedy is, in part, the price for integration - which has yielded mere marginal black groups within the professional disciplines of a frag- mented academic community. But this tragedy also has to do with the refusal of black intellectuals to establish and sustain their own institu- tional mechanisms of criticism and self-criticism, organized in such a way that people of whatever color would be able to contribute to it. This refusal over the past decade is significant in that it has lessened the appetite for, and the capacity to withstand, razor-sharpcriticism among many black intellectuals whose formative years were passed in a kind of intellectual vacuum. So besides the external hostile climate, the tradi- tion of serious black intellectual activity is also threatened from within. The creation of an intelligentsia is a monumental task. Yet black churches and colleges, along with some moral support, served as resources for the first black intellectuals with formal training. The for- mation of high-quality habits of criticism and international networks of serious intellectual exchange among a relatively isolated and in- sulated intelligentsia is a gargantuan endeavor. Yet black intellectuals have litte choice: either continued intellectual lethargy on the edges of the academy and literate subcultures unnoticed by the black com- munity, or insurgent creative activityon the margins of the mainstream