DOCSLIB.ORG

084114 March 07 Fc & Bc.Pm7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
084114 March 07 Fc & Bc.Pm7 Mr. Halleck’s New Deal: Congressman Charles Halleck and the Limits to Reform ROBERT L. FULLER harles Halleck joked after his election in 1935 that, as the sole CRepublican representative from Indiana, he held his caucus in a phone booth. However, over time Congressman Halleck rose through party ranks in the House from “waterboy” to majority leader when Republicans regained control of Congress in 1946.1 Because the GOP also won a majority of seats in the Senate, and many Southern Democrats proved cooperative in advancing Republican policies, Republicans stood a very good chance of implementing their program for America. Congressman Halleck, who had railed against the New Deal since he first took a seat in the House, stood in position to do something about it in 1947. Yet, once in office, the Republicans and Southern Democrats, supposedly so dead set against the New Deal, made very few proposals and offered hardly any legislation to alter New Deal reforms in any significant way. Aside from changing labor laws, they made no effort to overturn the legislative achievements of the 1930s that lasted longer than the Depression. Majority Leader Halleck, __________________________ Robert L. Fuller holds a Ph.D. in history from the University of Virginia. He is currently work- ing on a monograph about the banking crisis of the Great Depression. 1Charles A. Halleck to “Jim,” March 20, 1936, box 17, Charles A. Halleck Papers, Lilly Library, Indiana University, Bloomington (henceforth CAH). INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY, 103 (March 2007) ᭧ 2007, Trustees of Indiana University. MR. HALLECK’S NEW DEAL 67 Charles Halleck Courtesy Lilly Library, Indiana University Bloomington his Republican colleagues, and their allies among the Democrats only tinkered with a few of the reforms that remained in place after the Supreme Court ruled them constitutionally sound, because by and large Halleck and other Republicans supported most New Deal reforms. When they lambasted “the New Deal,” which they did loudly and often, they really targeted the frequently chaotic administration set into place by President Franklin D. Roosevelt to oversee the reforms and relief. Roosevelt’s “first New Deal,” a series of laws intended to save America’s banks and restore confidence in its financial institutions, sped through both houses in the early days of 1933. The laws proved general- ly popular and of varying effectiveness. Emergency acts intended to pro- vide short-term employment for the jobless ultimately provided millions of jobs for the unemployed and boosted morale within the nation, but failed to “prime the pump” and restore prosperity as intended. Those laws that regulated the banking system and supervised the stock exchanges (passed in 1934) were welcomed by the public and met with mixed reactions among business interests. Republican reaction to the 68 INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY proposed bills paralleled public response: they voted overwhelmingly for relief and banking reforms, but had varying responses to the laws to supervise the securities markets.2 Laws that intervened in the market system—including the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA), which sought to curb business competition in favor of cooperation to keep up prices and wages; the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA), which hoped to curb farm output and raise prices; and the law authorizing the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), which proposed to bestow a wide range of benefits upon the people of the Tennessee River Valley—met neither uniform hostility nor solid support. Regional reactions to such legislation proved stronger than partisan response.3 Historians typically ignore the mixed Republican support given New Deal-era legislation—as well as its subsequent bipartisan support— in favor of an account of a Republican-led assault upon the New Deal after 1945. Historian Jonathan Bell’s 2004 work, The Liberal State on Trial, describes the post-war eclipse of a New Deal-friendly social-demo- cratic agenda by the rise of an anti-communist dogma directed as much against the New Deal as against the Soviet Union and American commu- nists.4 This supposed post-war backlash against New Deal reformism is frequently painted as a war by business interests against labor unions, which had made such strides during the war with the helping hand of Uncle Sam. The expanding power of unions was, according to this ver- sion, opposed and reversed by conservatives like Halleck, who used popular disgust with communism as a tool to beat back “red” unions.5 Eric Goldman’s 1960 characterization of the work of the Eightieth Congress as “the wrathful counter-revolution” still typifies the views of historians today.6 While these views accurately echo Democratic and __________________________ 2Collier’s, “Your Congressman’s Vote on the New Deal,” 1934, box 51, John J. O’Connor Papers, Lilly Library. The undated special issue provides the roll-call votes on 22 major pieces of New Deal legislation. 3Kenneth Finegold and Theda Skocpol, State and Party in America’s New Deal (Madison, Wis., 1995), 209-10, points out that the regional appeal for the AAA was stronger than party allegiance. 4Jonathan Bell, The Liberal State on Trial: The Cold War and American Politics in the Truman Years (New York, 2004). 5See, for example, Steven Fraser, Labor Will Rule: Sidney Hillman and the Rise of American Labor (New York, 1991) 539-75; Robert H. Zieger, The CIO, 1935-1955 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1995), 244-45. 6Eric Goldman, The Crucial Decade—and After: America, 1945-1960 (New York, 1960), 56. MR. HALLECK’S NEW DEAL 69 Progressive campaign rhetoric of its day, the more personal version of 1940s politics derived from Halleck’s papers reveals a dramatically dif- ferent picture. Halleck and his allies’ pre-war railings against “the New Deal” had in fact targeted more specifically the host of unorthodox and often polit- ically inept administrators imported by Roosevelt to Washington, D.C., to implement the new federal programs put into place by the president and Congress. By the time Republicans retook control of Congress in 1947, most of Roosevelt’s appointees had long ago moved on to other tasks, frequently as much to FDR’s and Truman’s great relief as to that of their political opponents. With Harold Ickes, Tommy Corcoran, Rexford Tugwell, and other convenient targets of the Republicans out of public employ, the Republicans’ battle against New Deal excesses had for its focus only “the reds” who supposedly still populated the ranks of the federal bureaucracy.7 To be sure, Congressman Halleck objected not only to irritating officials and costly bureaucracy, but also to New Deal programs that vio- lated his conception of economic orthodoxy. Yet despite his reservations, he went along with and ultimately accepted most of them. He opposed programs intended to inflate prices and deflate the value of the currency, and he criticized (though did little about) programs that interfered with the free-market system. He challenged federal efforts, such as TVA’s elec- tricity program, that dictated prices or put the government into direct competition with private business. He also consistently protested the size and cost of the bureaucracy necessary to implement federal pro- grams. Halleck and other Republicans had fixed ideas about fiscal poli- cies and appropriate functions for the federal government, but those ideas had been tempered by the blows of the Depression, and by 1947 they accommodated a large and expensive federal government. These legislators did not love expensive government, but they accepted it. The Republicans of 1947 oversaw federal programs that touched the daily lives of citizens because, by and large, they had agreed to such programs as they were first implemented. The political career of Charles Halleck serves to demonstrate Republican accommodation to federal involve- __________________________ 7See Katie Louchheim, ed., The Making of the New Deal: The Insiders Speak (Cambridge, Mass., 1982). Louchheim, herself a young New Dealer, collected the reminiscences of other young New Dealers—mostly lawyers—many of whom years afterward laugh at their youthful igno- rance and ineptness. 70 INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY ment in many spheres that had provoked staunch opposition from con- gressmen of both parties before the Great Depression. When he assumed the powerful position of majority leader in 1947, Halleck already firmly supported government programs set into place by President Roosevelt’s New Deal. In his brief 1935 campaign, Halleck, an ambitious prosecutor from Rensselaer, Indiana, endorsed emergency relief, old-age pensions, a sta- ble currency, and a balanced budget—all positions consistent with mid- western Republicanism of the day and compatible with the proclaimed ends of Roosevelt’s New Deal administration.8 Unfortunately, America could not have relief and pensions as well as a stable currency and a bal- anced budget. Congressional Republicans and the president made the same compromise: a balanced budget had to be sacrificed temporarily to achieve more urgent ends. Despite running large budget deficits, the administration and congressional Democrats still extolled the conven- tion of the balanced budget, and for years promised one in the near future. Halleck’s orthodox economic thinking, which he had absorbed as an economics student at Indiana University, guided him to oppose most taxes and all spending bills intended to put money into circulation rather than to procure some specified public good. The “fast talking” freshman congressman’s relatively narrow view of the “public good” excluded, for example, $350,000 in federal expenditures for the California Pacific International Exposition of 1935 or funding for the Blue Ridge Parkway.9 This position was entirely consistent with the “Economy Act” of 1933, which had cut federal workers’ pay and veter- ans’ benefits in the name of “cutting wasteful spending.” Though a vet- eran of the First World War himself, Halleck, joined by six Indiana Democrats, voted against the Patman Veterans’ Bonus Bill, intended to put money into the pockets of World War veterans and to inflate the money supply by two billion dollars.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BUY~ Am.WA~Itt O
    - - - - -- BUY~ am.WA~Itt o - C:ON~UM~~sr ~E.S~A~Cr-t ~ -- - C:ONSUM-Ft ~MO~ME.NT~ 1926 -1~ao~~-~~;~ --~ -:: --'7 ~ - ~- ~ - ,.- ·: _- - :;;;: -: ~ = ==- -- --= ~-~ --= = ~--= ::=:: ~ -- = ~ :- ~==-= - ..: :..:=- ~--= ~~ -=-~ =:---: :: .;;.~~- -= -~ ~::-:;;;: -- ~ ~:~: ~- ~ :==._---: = ---::... - ~- - ::::::. _., - - America's PIONEER ~=­ O_rgQ.n~izt~tion ~ ---- - TESTING ~- ·-::-::-~ - - -~~ ~~ -~ ' - -: - - - - for COt+S-UME.RS :i ~~~ - .= -~- =- ~-====- - -:. ~-~~""7 _E ~~ =--~ _;_-- _---:-~-_ -- --- ;;-.- - - ,.,. ::-.;:: ~.=.;;.:;,·==- - ::~- ~- ~ ~ ~==~§: -- -- ~-= - :;;--- ~::-: - :;;. ...:-:::::: ~~~~--:: ~ =;_ __ --- - -- - - Gallery 'SOCand Special Collections and University Archiv~s- }3aUerx ~- ~ __ - ~ _ _ _ -~- ~ ~--~= -: Archibald Stev_~I1S ~le~a~nder Libr~ry -__ _ January 26 to=April 15f 1995 - BUYE.~ BE.WA~E:.! C:O~SUME.~Sr ~E.SE.A~C:ti AND Tf1Er. C:ONSUM~t~ MO~MitNT~ 1926 -1980 Gallery '50 and Special Collections and University Archives Archibald Stevens Alexander Library Curator: Gregory L. Williams CONTENTS EXHffiiTION TEXT . 1 CONSUMERS' RESEARCH COLLECfiON SUMMARY ................. 10 CONSUMERS' RESEARCH HISTORY .............................. 11 BUYER BEWARE: CONSUMERS' RESEARCH AND THE CONSUMER MOVEMENT, 1926-1980 INTRODUCTION Consumer testing and rating magazines are taken for granted at the end of the 20th century. Many of these product testing or rating publications have similar names, test the same products, and look alike. Before 1927 there were no guides or booklets for consumers to turn to for non-commercial
    [Show full text]
  • Engineers, Economists and Recurring Energy Theories of Value
    FROM TECHNOCRACY TO NET ENERGY ANALYSIS: ENGINEERS, ECONOMISTS AND RECURRING ENERGY THEORIES OF VALUE by Ernst R. Berndt WP#1353-82 September 1982 [R] ____________________________1__11 FROM TECHNOCRACY TO NET ENERGY ANALYSIS: ENGINEERS, ECONOMISTS AND RECURRING ENERGY THEORIES OF VALUE by Ernst R. Berndt Massachusetts Institute of Technology Revised September 1982 Studies in Energy and the American Economy Discussion Paper No. 11 MIT-EL 81-065WP Research supported by the Department of Energy, under Contract EX-76-A-01-2295, Task Order 67, is gratefully acknowledged, as is support for earlier research on this topic provided by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the M.I.T. Center for Energy Policy Research. Discussions with participants of the Energy Policy Seminar at the M.I.T. Center for Energy Policy Research are also gratefully acknowledged, as are the helpful comments of Morris Adelman, Donald Blake, Harrison Brown, Robert Evans, Bruce Hannon, Paul Heyne, M. King Hubbert, Ralph Huenemann, J.R. Norsworthy, Paul Samuelson, Anthony Scott, Kirk Smith, Peter Temin and David Wood. Bibliographical assistance from librarians at the City of Calgary, New York University, M.I.T., City of Seattle, University of British Columbia, and the City of Vancouver is greatly appreciated. Forthcoming in Anthony D. Scott et al., eds., Studies in Natural Resource Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983. I. Introduction "Pragmatically, a way to begin would be to set up a capability in government to budget according to flows of energy rather than money. Energy is the all-pervasive underlying currency of our society."1 - U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Politics: Consumers and the Public Good During the “Jazz Age”
    Lawrence B. Glickman Rethinking Politics: Consumers and the Public Good during the “Jazz Age” he 1920s are often understood as Whatever critical spirit remained from a time of economic abundance the previous decade transmogrified Tand political quiescence. itself from progressive activism to the Frequently the decade’s supposed cynicism characteristic of the “lost political lethargy and conservatism is generation.” Thus Paul Carter entitles seen as a consequence of its supposed the introductory chapter of his survey affluence. With progressive energies text on the decade, “Of Bohemians and exhausted—weakened by World Consumers.” This title characterizes War I and the domestic repression the two sides of declining political that accompanied and followed engagement: the cynical artiste and the it—and with the economy booming, solipsistic shopper (1). Americans, in this stereotypical Indeed, the 1920s did represent a vision, turned inward. Enjoying the takeoff period for consumer society. private pleasures afforded by the During the decade, pundits, scholars, new affluence of the “jazz age,” and many ordinary Americans claimed they displayed either indifference to be observing an epochal and or cynicism to the well-being of the multifaceted transformation whose key public sphere. feature was a shift from production to Commentators often speak of the consumption. While a robust consumer rise of “consumer society” in the 1920s economy had been developing since as a way to encapsulate these political at least the market revolution of the and economic transformations. They early nineteenth-century, several frequently use the term to explain elements converged in the 1920s the economic vibrancy and political to create a fully mature consumer passivity that they take to characterize society.
    [Show full text]
  • A Proposal for Planned Expansion of Small Towns As Regional Population Magnets
    YESTERDAY'S SOLUTIONS TO TODAY'S PROBLEMS: A PROPOSAL FOR PLANNED EXPANSION OF SMALL TOWNS AS REGIONAL POPULATION MAGNETS by JULIA HESSEL MADDOX B. A., University of Kentucky, 1966 A MASTER'S THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY PLANNING Department of Regional and Community Planning KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 1978 Approved by: JaL fessor 'Oocumerd .T 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHRONOLOGICAL INFORMATION iv Chapter I. THE REGIONAL PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA 1 Charles Whitaker Edith Elmer Wood Clarence Stein Henry Wright Frederick Ackerman Lewis Mumford Benton MacKaye Stuart Chase Catherine Bauer Wurster John Irwin Bright Alexander Bina Inside the RPAA Sunnyside Gardens and Radburn Elements of the RPAA's Program The RPAA and The New Deal Conclusion II. THE NEW DEAL 43 Rexford Tugwell The Planning Agency as the Fourth Power New Deal Relocation Programs Subsistence Homesteads Program The Subsistence Homesteads Bill The End of the Division of Subsistence Homesteads The Resettlement Administration Suburban Resettlement Division Inside the Resettlement Administration Communities The Greenbelt Towns Greenbelt, Maryland Greenhills, Ohio Greendale, Wisconsin Greenbelt Towns in Operation Chapter Page III. COMMUNITIES IN COOPERATION 97 Democracy and Cooperation RPAA and Cooperative Housing Bryn Gweled— A Thriving Cooperative Community Conclusion IV. EXPANSION AND COOPERATION 127 Planned Expansion of Existing Towns English Experience with Town Expansion Housing Cooperatives Housing by People Conclusion REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 158 CHRONOLOGICAL INFORMATION 1850-1900--Progressive Housing Movement 1899--Ebenezer Howard formed the Garden City Association 1903--First garden city, Letchworth, was begun. 1920--Raloh Borsodi homesteaded in Suffern, New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Kallet, Arthur
    History of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Interviewee: Arthur Kallet Interviewer: Charles O. Jackson Professor, Department of History University of Tennessee Date: November 18, 1968 Place: New York, NY Arthur Kallet Interview Index Page#: Subject: 1 Introductory remarks about interviewee Arthur Kallet 2 Founding of Consumers' Research Early employment (1917) American Standards Association 3 1906 Food & Drug Law provisions & limitations Tenure of FDA Commissioner Walter Campbell 5 Chamber of Horrors documentary on needed new legistration 7 Depression effects Consumer Research & FDA relationship 9 Consumer Research interest in new legislation 11 Rexford Tugwell's role in new legislation 12 Public apathy; media blackout 14 Sen. Royal Copeland sponsorship role 16 Other Congressional Members interest 17 Women's organization interests 19 American Medical Association (AMA) role & orientation 21 Franklin D. Roosevelt's interest 24 New Deal's impact on consumer protection 27 Consumer Research support for making FDA an independent Agency, apart from USDA 29 Lobbyists' influence on Congress in the 1930's 31 Federal Trade Commission (FTC) role in regulating advertising 32 One Hundred Million Guiena Pigs - publication that triggered interest in new legislation 34 Consumer Research split- organization of separate Consumer's Union 37 Differences between Schlink & Kallet 39 1938 Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act commentary - strengths & weaknesses 41 James L. Goddard, as FDA Commissioner 42 FTC's advertising control, since 1938 43 Ongoing shortcomings in consumer protection re food & drug products Arthur Kallet, an engineer, joined with his associate at Consumers’ Research, F. J. Schlink, to publish, in 1933, 100,000,000 Guinea Pigs: Dangers in Everyday Foods, Drugs, and Cosmetics, which brought him immediate national prominence.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 193B ELECTION in SOUTH DAKOTA John E. Miller Election
    McCARTHYISM BEFORE McCARTHY: THE 193B ELECTION IN SOUTH DAKOTA 3B by JOhn E. Miller 'TIER 22 Election campaigns illuminClte not only public problems Clnd VEST 27 is sues; they Cllso lay bare the private fantasies and frustrations of peo­ ple and provide clues to the symbolic mental environments within which they operate. Campaigns are cultural as well as political processes • •ND The rewards they offer are symbolic as well as tangible, elusive and 37 ambivalent as well as concrete and direct. While there Is utility in Harold Lasswell's model which states that politics determines "who gets whClt, when, how," 1 much CCln be gClined by conceiving of politics as a process involving the manipulation of symbols, the working out of justifications Clnd rationales for public actions, and the development of relatively consistent ideologies useful for explaining stands on issues Cl nd estClblishing group identifications. 2 story at South Dakota St2te lolitical history but <'lc:nita to After the First World War, Western intellectuals grew increasingly :ory. His present interest is sophisticated about the processes by which people acquired their ideas It Plains during the twentieth and the manner in which political rhetoric and propaganda could be put to use in thro service of pClrtisan causes. Walter Lippmann, in Public Opin­ ion, a p2th-brcaking work published in 1922, stated that it was "clear It Patton Junior High School enough that under certain conditions men respond as powerfully to fic­ 15 in genealogy and family tions as they do to realities, and that in many cases they help to create from old family pa;Jers and thc very fictions to which they respond." He went on to observe that "no successful leader has ever been too busy to cultivate the symbols which organize his following." They establish unity, he said, and .
    [Show full text]
  • The Consumers' Research Archives at the Rutgers University Libraries
    RUTGERS UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES 25 BUYER BEWARE: THE CONSUMERS' RESEARCH ARCHIVES AT THE RUTGERS UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES BY GREGORY L. WILLIAMS Mr. Williams is Archivist at the New Jersey Historical Society. He was formerly the Consumers' Research Archivist, Special Collections and University Archives, Rutgers University Libraries. History of Consumers' Research, Inc. Today, consumer testing and rating guides are taken for granted. It is not unusual for a shopper to take a copy of Consumer Reports to a stereo or appliance store, or consult any number of specialized consumer publica- tions before purchasing a particular product. Prior to 1927, there were no organizations dedicated to helping consumers choose between competing brands of products. Frederick J. Schlink, born in Peoria, Illinois, in 1891, pioneered the effort to research and disseminate unbiased product informa- tion to consumers. Trained as an engineer, Schlink had acquired extensive experience in the field of standardization at the National Bureau of Stan- dards in Washington, DC, and with the American Standards Association in New York City. He combined his interest in the standardization of products created for mass production, a disdain for bogus advertising claims, and a background in testing products to form the Consumers' Club in New York City in 1927. With the publication of his book Your Money ys Worth (co-authored with Stuart Chase) in the same year, public sentiment was stirred to demand a consumer testing organization.1 This book exposed the excesses of advertising and the hazards of shoddy products, and called for independent product testing. The overwhelming response to the Your Money's Worth led to the publication of the first consumer rating bulletin entitled The Consumers ' Club Commodity List.
    [Show full text]
  • The Road We Are Traveling: 1914-1942 Guide Lines to America's Future^
    THE ROAD WHEN THE WAR ENDS WE ARE STUART chase has been commissioned by the Trustees of The Twentieth Century Fund to make a series of exploratory reports on postwar problems. These are being published under the general title, "When The War Ends," and the books are planned to appear at TRAVELING intervals of a few months during 1942 and 1943. The present vol- ume explores basic issues and fundamental trends. Later books in the series will examine specific questions of postwar readjustment. 1914-1942 The tentative list of titles follows: 1 The Road We Are Traveling: 1914-1942 Guide lines to America's future^ 2 as reported to Goals for America: A Budget of Our Needs and Resources tin; twentieth century fund 3 The Dollar Dilemma: Problems of Postwar Finance by 4 STUART CHASE Tomorrow's Trade: Problems of Our Foreign Commerce 5 Farmer, Worker, Businessman: Their Place in Postwar America 6 Winning the Peace NEW YORK 1 ill! TWENTIETH CENTURY FUND 1942 u — COPYRIGHT 1942 BY THE TWENTIETH CENTURY FUND, INC. FOREWORD First published April 1942 Reprinted April 1942 America is at war. The first live nl .ill of us must be to win. c lo< )k to the end of the war, however, we see a task I. itself. This is the task of I frantic than victory uses. i hi i co >nomy back to peacetime • effort will be affected by 1 our war 1 uiy, the very sinew of become second 1 has 1 we see ahead. Planning for peace nporl ance to winning the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Stuart Chase and Red Scare #2, 1946-1954 Richard Vangermeersch
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Special Collections Publications (Miscellaneous) Special Collections 2006 Stuart Chase and Red Scare #2, 1946-1954 Richard Vangermeersch Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/sc_pubs Part of the History Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Vangermeersch, Richard, "Stuart Chase and Red Scare #2, 1946-1954" (2006). Special Collections Publications (Miscellaneous). Paper 7. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/sc_pubs/7 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Special Collections Publications (Miscellaneous) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stuart Chase and Red Scare #2 1946-1954 INTRODUCTION I have written an academic piece, “The Marking of Stuart Chase As a ‘Red Accountant’--An Epic (1917-1921)” on Stuart Chase (SC) and Red Scare #1, 1917-1921. The current piece is a much more casual type writing and, hopefully, will be a part of the SC website. My purpose in this piece is to illustrate how SC was smeared in the Reece Committee Report of 1954 without any possibility of retort before the Committee. This piece might inspire a much more academic work on the Reece Committee--a rich topic indeed. This piece also shows that SC was a marked man by the FBI for a very long period of time. The Reece Committee and its report had to compete with the Army-McCarthy Hearings and, as such, never received the attention that this attack on American academic research deserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Name: Richard Staley Fax: + 44 (0)1223 334554 Telephone Number
    Name: Richard Staley Fax: + 44 (0)1223 334554 Telephone number: + 44 (0)1223 334555 Email: [email protected] THE INTERWAR PERIOD AS A MACHINE AGE: MECHANICS, THE MACHINE, MECHANISMS AND THE MARKET IN DISCOURSE∗ Argument This paper examines some of the ways that machines, mechanisms and the new mechanics were treated in post World War I discourse. Spengler’s 1919 Decline of the West and Hessen’s 1931 study of Newton have usually been tied closely to Weimar culture in Germany, and Soviet politics. Linking them also to the writings of Rathenau, Simmel, Chase, Mumford, Hayek and others, as well as to Dada and film studies of the city will indicate central features of a wide-ranging, international discourse on the machine and mechanisation. I argue that machines were so thoroughly integrated into social and economic experience that we can treat this as a distinctive new phase in the cultural history of mechanics, what some contemporaries called the “machine age”: a period in which rather than the hand mill or steam engine, the city stands as an appropriate realisation (and sometimes symbol) of the significance but also ambiguities and tensions of mechanical life; and concepts of mechanisation were extended to encompass the economy and market mechanisms. Two major events in the interwar period have strongly shaped our understandings of the social history of physics in particular and science and technology in general, while also playing signal roles in the development of the historiography of science and technology: Oswald Spengler’s publication ∗ I would like to thank participants in Tel Aviv and Budapest workshops on Interactions of Interwar Physics: Technology, Instruments and Other Sciences for their helpful comments, and in particular Shaul Katzir, Karl Hall and two anonymous referees for their careful reading and many helpful suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marking of Stuart Chase As a "Red Accountant"
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Special Collections Publications (Miscellaneous) Special Collections 2006 The aM rking of Stuart Chase as a "Red Accountant" - An Epic (1917-1921) Richard Vangermeersch Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/sc_pubs Part of the History Commons, and the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Vangermeersch, Richard, "The aM rking of Stuart Chase as a "Red Accountant" - An Epic (1917-1921)" (2006). Special Collections Publications (Miscellaneous). Paper 8. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/sc_pubs/8 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Special Collections Publications (Miscellaneous) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MARKING OF STUART CHASE AS A “RED ACCOUNTANT”--AN EPIC (1917-1921) Richard Vangermeersch P.O. Box 338 Kingston, RI 02881 (401) 783-8853 [email protected] 2 THE MARKING OF STUART CHASE AS A “RED ACCOUNTANT”--AN EPIC (1917-1921) Stuart Chase (SC) was excoriated as being a “Red Accountant” on the floor of the U.S. Senate on October 20, 1919 by Senator James E. Watson (1863-1948, IA, 1906- 1933 USS, 1895-1897 HR, 1899-1909 HR, Republican) (Congressional Record (CR), pp. 7166-7169). SC was then a 31 year old CPA working for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and investigating the Big 5 Meat Packers (Armour & Co.; Swift & Co.; Wilson & Co.; Morris & Co.; and the Cudahy Co.) during World War I (1914-1918; U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Land and Liberty: Henry George, the Single Tax Movement, and the Origins of 20Th Century Liberalism
    Land and Liberty: Henry George, the Single Tax Movement, and the Origins of 20 th Century Liberalism A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In History By Christopher William England, B.A. Washington, DC August 25 th , 2015 Copyright 2015 by Christopher England All Rights Reserved [ii] Land and Liberty: Henry George, the Single Tax Movement, and the Origins of 20 th Century Liberalism Christopher William England, B.A. Dissertation Adviser: Michael Kazin, Ph.D. ABSTRACT In the 1880s, Henry George rose to fame with a series of best-selling books that proposed a social state funded by revenue from a single tax on land. Many historians have described his dramatic race for mayor of New York on a Labor Party ticket in 1886. Few, however, have written about the relationship between George, who died in 1897, and his campaign manager, Tom Johnson, who as Mayor of Cleveland became the nation’s leading proponent of public ownership of utilities during the early 20 th century. Similarly absent from the literature is an appreciation of how Louis Post’s single-tax newspaper, The Public , modernized George’s policies for leading progressive reformers like Brand Whitlock, Newton Baker, William U’Ren, and Frederic C. Howe. Rather than fading after George’s death, the movement had by the 1910s developed a firm basis of power in American cities, where it expanded the Democratic Party’s reach and accrued the political capital to obtain high positions in the Wilson Administration.
    [Show full text]