GENERAL AGREEMENT on L/344/Corr.1 9 March 1955

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

GENERAL AGREEMENT on L/344/Corr.1 9 March 1955

RESTRICTED GENERAL AGREEMENT ON L/344/Corr.1 TARIFFS AND TRADE 9 March 1955 Limited Distribution CONTRACTING PARTIES Ninth Session SPECIAL PROBLEMS OF DEPENDENT OVERSEAS TERRITORIES OF THE UNITED KINGDOM Report by Working Party on Dependent Overseas Territories Corrigendum Page 1. para 2. In the quotation of the proposal of the United Kingdom delegation (L/296) the third line should read: "of a dependent territory for whose external relations it is responsible, ..." Page 3. para 6. In the third line before the end of that paragraph the words "in large measure" should be deleted. Page 4. The heading before paragraph 10 should read: "Wholly or in large measure dependent on the United Kingdom as a market" thus conforming the phraseology used in the Decision in Annex I on page 8, second paragraph of the preamble, and page 9 in paragraph 2(a). Page 12. Replace the Annex II by the following: L/344/Corr.1 Page 2 ANNEX II DEPENDENT OVERSEAS TERRITORIES OF THE UNITED KINGDOM (as of 5 March 1955) AFRICAN GROUP ATLANTIC AND INDIAN OCEAN GROUP Gambia Bahamas Gold Coast Bermuda Togoland (under U.K. Trusteeship) Falkland Islands Nigeria St. Helena Cameroons (under U.K. Trusteeship) Ascension Sierra Leone Tristan da Cunha Somaliland Protectorate Aden (Colony and Protectorate) Kenya Mauritius and Dependencies Uganda Seychelles Tanganyika Zanzibar and Pemba MEDITERRANEAN GROUP Basutoland Bechuanaland Protectorate Cyprus Swaziland Gibraltar Malta and Gozo EASTERN GROUP WESTERN PACIFIC GROUP Federation of Malaya Fiji Singapore British Solomon Brunei Islands Protectorate Gilbert and Ellice Islands Colony North Borneo New Hebrides Sarawak Pitcairn Hong Kong Tonga WEST INDIES GROUP Barbados British Guiana British Honduras Jamaica Cayman Islands Turks and Caicos Islands Leeward Islands: Antigua Montserrat St. Christopher Nevis and Anguilla Virgin Islands Trinidad and Tobago Windward Islands Dominica Grenada St. Lucia St. Vincent.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

(I.) Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia and The
(I.) MEČISLAV BORÁK (Czech Republic) The main features of occupation policy in the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia and the rest of Protectorate of the Czech Lands Bohemia and When Nazi German troops occupied the interior of the Czech Lands in March 1939, the invasion marked the beginning of over six years of occupation which would last until the final days of the Second World War in Europe. On Moravia and the basis of a decree issued by Hitler, the occupying authorities established an entity named the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia; however, despite its proclaimed autonomy, the Protectorate was in fact entirely controlled by the post-war the German Reich, and the Reich’s actions proved decisive for the fate of the Czech nation. When researching this period, however, we should not neglect the fact that there were other parts of the Czech Lands which lay outside development of the the Protectorate throughout the war, as the Nazis had seized them from Czechoslovakia in the autumn of 1938, before the invasion of what remained of the country. This seizure was a consequence of the Munich Agreement, State – historical which enabled Nazi Germany to annex the border areas in the historical provinces of Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia; the Agreement was forced upon the Czechoslovak Republic, and ultimately led to the state’s disintegration overview and demise. In September 1939 the Polish-occupied part of Těšín (Teschen/ Cieszyn) Silesia were taken by Germany; from this point on, the entire territory of the Czech Lands (both the border regions and the interior) came under the direct control of the Third Reich.
[Show full text]
The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era
Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 151-168 The sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit era Maria Mut Bosque School of Law, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain MINECO DER 2017-86138, Ministry of Economic Affairs & Digital Transformation, Spain Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, UK [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: This paper focuses on an analysis of the sovereignty of two territorial entities that have unique relations with the United Kingdom: the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories (BOTs). Each of these entities includes very different territories, with different legal statuses and varying forms of self-administration and constitutional linkages with the UK. However, they also share similarities and challenges that enable an analysis of these territories as a complete set. The incomplete sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and BOTs has entailed that all these territories (except Gibraltar) have not been allowed to participate in the 2016 Brexit referendum or in the withdrawal negotiations with the EU. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that Brexit is not an exceptional situation. In the future there will be more and more relevant international issues for these territories which will remain outside of their direct control, but will have a direct impact on them. Thus, if no adjustments are made to their statuses, these territories will have to keep trusting that the UK will be able to represent their interests at the same level as its own interests. Keywords: Brexit, British Overseas Territories (BOTs), constitutional status, Crown Dependencies, sovereignty https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.114 • Received June 2019, accepted March 2020 © 2020—Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
[Show full text]
Aden History
10/14/2016 Aden History ﺃﺳﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺗﺣﺭﻳﺭ Editors: ﺍﻟﺩﻛﺗﻭﺭ ﻋﺑﺩﷲ ﺍﻟﺳﻳﺎﺭﻱ Dr. A. Al Sayyari (Saudi Arabia) Dr. Shihab Ghanem ﺍﻟﺩﻛﺗﻭﺭ ﺷﻬﺎﺏ ﻏﺎﻧﻡ (UAE) ﺃﻻﻣﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻣﺗﺣﺩﺓ) Dhow symbol which Ashraf Girgrah was incorporated (Canada) ﺃﺷﺭﻑ ﺟﺭﺟﺭﻩ into the Union Jack to form Aden Colony flag. Design : Ashraf Girgrah ﺃﺷﺭﻑ ﺟﺭﺟﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﺗﺣﺩﻳﺙ ﺍﻻﺧﻳﺭ ﻓﻲ Last update Oct. 2016 Search Query ﻋﻧﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻻﺗﺻﺎﻝ Contact address: [email protected] Search European Time A short history of Aden Colony 18391967 The first European to give a first hand description on Aden at the beginning of the 16th century, was the Italian Ludovico di Varthema. He writes: "Aden is such mighty and powerful that I have hardly seen another city of its might during my life . all big ships anchor at the port coming from India Ethiopia or Sira Isalnd harbour in 1512. Persia".(1) www.philipsharpegallery.com Copper line engraving showing the earliest view of Aden first published by Braun and Hogenberg in Cologne 1572. An ancient trade center, the city of Aden was under Egyptian control British Navy squadron from the 3rd century BC until it became a Roman colony in 24 BC. It invading Aden in 1839. fell successively under Ethiopian and Persian control and became associated with Yemen about the 7th century AD. It fell to the Turks in Captain Haines, first 1538 and was incorporated into the Sultanate of Lahej in 1728. Under British Agent the rule of the Sultan of Lahej, Aden had declined to a small fishing appointee after invading village with only 600 inhabitants.(2) Aden on January In 1838, Sultan Muhsin bin Fadl ceded 75 square miles 194 (sq.
[Show full text]
Challenges to Humanitarian Action During Decolonization
International Review of the Red Cross (2016), 97 (897/898), 45–76. Principles guiding humanitarian action doi:10.1017/S1816383115000636 Humanitarian principles put to the test: Challenges to humanitarian action during decolonization Andrew Thompson* Andrew Thompson is Professor of Modern History at the University of Exeter and Director of Exeter’s Centre for Imperial and Global History, a Council Member of the Arts and Humanities Research Council, and an Honorary Professor at the University of South Africa in Pretoria. Abstract This article examines the meaning and purpose of the Fundamental Principles of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement during and after decolonization. This was a period when the character of conflict experienced far-reaching changes, when the limitations of international humanitarian law were sharply exposed, and when humanitarian organizations of all kinds – the International Committee of the Red Cross included – redefined their missions and mandates. The Fundamental Principles were caught up in these processes; subject to a resurgent State sovereignty, they were both animated and constrained by the geopolitical forces of the era. The article pays particular attention to the politicization of the Principles in the contexts of colonial counter-insurgency, political detention and transfers of power. * This article draws on research in the archives of the British Red Cross Society in London and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in Geneva. I am grateful to Jean-Luc Blondel, Fabrizio Bensi, Paul Castella, Geoff Loane, Jacques Moreillon and Daniel Palmieri for their guidance and advice on the history of the ICRC. © icrc 2015 45 A. Thompson Keywords: Fundamental Principles, Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, Geneva Conventions, decolonization, forced resettlement, liberation movements, colonial counter-insurgency, political detention.
[Show full text]
UK and Colonies
This document was archived on 27 July 2017 UK and Colonies 1. General 1.1 Before 1 January 1949, the principal form of nationality was British subject status, which was obtained by virtue of a connection with a place within the Crown's dominions. On and after this date, the main form of nationality was citizenship of the UK and Colonies, which was obtained by virtue of a connection with a place within the UK and Colonies. 2. Meaning of the expression 2.1 On 1 January 1949, all the territories within the Crown's dominions came within the UK and Colonies except for the Dominions of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Newfoundland, India, Pakistan and Ceylon (see "DOMINIONS") and Southern Rhodesia, which were identified by s.1(3) of the BNA 1948 as independent Commonwealth countries. Section 32(1) of the 1948 Act defined "colony" as excluding any such country. Also excluded from the UK and Colonies was Southern Ireland, although it was not an independent Commonwealth country. 2.2 For the purposes of the BNA 1948, the UK included Northern Ireland and, as of 10 February 1972, the Island of Rockall, but excluded the Channel Islands and Isle of Man which, under s.32(1), were colonies. 2.3 The significance of a territory which came within the UK and Colonies was, of course, that by virtue of a connection with such a territory a person could become a CUKC. Persons who, prior to 1 January 1949, had become British subjects by birth, naturalisation, annexation or descent as a result of a connection with a territory which, on that date, came within the UK and Colonies were automatically re- classified as CUKCs (s.12(1)-(2)).
[Show full text]
A Global Comparison of Non-Sovereign Island Territories: the Search for ‘True Equality’
Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 43-66 A global comparison of non-sovereign island territories: the search for ‘true equality’ Malcom Ferdinand CNRS, Paris, France [email protected] Gert Oostindie KITLV, the Netherlands Leiden University, the Netherlands [email protected] (corresponding author) Wouter Veenendaal KITLV, the Netherlands Leiden University, the Netherlands [email protected] Abstract: For a great majority of former colonies, the outcome of decolonization was independence. Yet scattered across the globe, remnants of former colonial empires are still non-sovereign as part of larger metropolitan states. There is little drive for independence in these territories, virtually all of which are small island nations, also known as sub-national island jurisdictions (SNIJs). Why do so many former colonial territories choose to remain non-sovereign? In this paper we attempt to answer this question by conducting a global comparative study of non-sovereign jurisdictions. We start off by analyzing their present economic, social and political conditions, after which we assess local levels of (dis)content with the contemporary political status, and their articulation in postcolonial politics. We find that levels of discontent and frustration covary with the particular demographic, socio- economic and historical-cultural conditions of individual territories. While significant independence movements can be observed in only two or three jurisdictions, in virtually all cases there is profound dissatisfaction and frustration with the contemporary non-sovereign arrangement and its outcomes. Instead of achieving independence, the territories’ real struggle nowadays is for obtaining ‘true equality’ with the metropolis, as well as recognition of their distinct cultural identities.
[Show full text]
State of the County March 2, 2021
STATE OF THE COUNTY MARCH 2, 2021 Delivered by Chairman of the Board, Vito Chiesa 1 Good Morning my fellow members of the Board of Supervisors, CEO Hayes, County Counsel Boze, those who are in the chambers today and those who might be watching on television or over the internet. It is a privilege to present the State of the County Address for 2021. And what a humbling experience this is, during one of the most historic times in the history of our nation and the world. I want to offer thanks to our immediate past chair, former Supervisor Kristin Olsen. Her commitment left us a tremendous example of how to lead. I am also especially thankful for my time having served alongside Supervisor Jim DeMartini. Supervisor DeMartini, served the County selflessly year after year. He was a tireless, committed, and reliable leader with conviction. Supervisor Withrow…Terry, we have sat here together for years and every week I look forward to hearing your passion come through. Your drive to serve people in need - especially those with mental health or homelessness struggles - inspires me. And to the three new Supervisors serving the County, Supervisors Mani Grewal, Channce Condit, and Buck Condit, each of you comes to us with a history of public service and a passion for the community. Thank you for your commitment to the people we serve. I feel honored to serve alongside each of you. This past year saw a tremendous loss with the passing of Supervisor Tom Berryhill. Even if you did not know Tom personally, he was a friend to this community, defending and fighting for our region his entire career.
[Show full text]
Country Report: France
Country Report: France 2020 Update 2020 Update Acknowledgements & Methodology The 2020 update of this report was written by Laurent Delbos and Claire Tripier at Forum réfugiés – Cosi and edited by ECRE. Forum réfugiés-Cosi wishes to thank all those individuals and organisations who shared their expertise to contribute or check the information gathered during the research. Particular thanks are owed to many Forum réfugiés-Cosi colleagues who have shared their practical experience on the right of asylum in France – which have been key to feed concrete reality-checks and observations into this report; to the two lawyers who have taken the time to share their views on the French system; to the staff of France terre d’asile, the Anafé and the UNHCR Paris office for their expert and constructive feedback provided for the initial report and finally to ECRE for its support throughout the drafting process. Forum réfugiés- Cosi would also like to thank the European Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) for co-financing its awareness-raising missions which allowed us to provide additional time to research and draft this report. The findings presented in this report stem from background desk research, interviews with field practitioners and lawyers, as well as feedback from French NGOs and the Paris-based UNHCR office and finally statistics shared by the French authorities. Caveat: In France, asylum policies – including reception procedures – are largely under prefectural execution. This review of practice is mostly based on observations in the departments of Ile de France, Rhône, Puy-de-Dôme, Haute- Garonne and Alpes-Maritimes. However, the conclusions presented in this report on the concrete implementation of asylum policies have been cross-checked and triangulated with observations of these practices in other regions and are supported by findings presented in other reports – be they official or drafted by civil society organisations.
[Show full text]
Consumer Price Index, Northeast Region – March 2021
For Release: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 21-680-PHI MID-ATLANTIC INFORMATION OFFICE: Philadelphia, Pa. Technical information: (215) 597-3282 [email protected] www.bls.gov/regions/mid-atlantic Media contact: (215) 861-5600 [email protected] Consumer Price Index, Northeast Region – March 2021 Regional prices up 0.6 percent over the month; up 2.1 percent over the year The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) in the Northeast increased 0.6 percent in March, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Regional Commissioner Alexandra Hall Bovee noted that the recent increase reflected advances in the all items less food and energy index (0.5 percent) and the energy index (2.3 percent) since February. The food index also increased over the month, up 0.6 percent. (Data in this report are not seasonally adjusted. Accordingly, month-to-month changes may reflect the impact of seasonal influences.) Over the last 12 months, the Northeast all items CPI-U increased 2.1 percent (See chart 1 and table A.) This reflected an advance in the all items less food and energy index, up 1.3 percent. The energy index and the food index also rose since March 2020, up 9.9 and 3.3 percent, respectively. (See table 1.) Food The food index increased 0.6 percent since February. Prices were higher for both food away from home and food at home, up 1.0 and 0.3 percent, respectively. From March 2020 to March 2021, the food index increased 3.3 percent. Prices for food away from home increased over the year, up 4.5 percent; those for food at home also rose, up 2.5 percent.
[Show full text]
The UK Caribbean Overseas Territories, New Labour, and the Strengthening of Metropolitan Control Caribbean Studies, Vol
Caribbean Studies ISSN: 0008-6533 [email protected] Instituto de Estudios del Caribe Puerto Rico Clegg, Peter The UK caribbean overseas territories, new labour, and the strengthening of metropolitan control Caribbean Studies, vol. 34, núm. 1, enero-junio, 2006, pp. 131-161 Instituto de Estudios del Caribe San Juan, Puerto Rico Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=39211247005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative THE UK CARIBBEAN OVERSEAS TERRITORIES... 131 THE UK CARIBBEAN OVERSEAS TERRITORIES, NEW LABOUR, AND THE STRENGTHENING OF METROPOLITAN CONTROL Peter Clegg ABSTRACT The article analyses the complex and ever-evolving relationship between Britain and its Overseas Territories in the Caribbean. Links between Britain and its Territories have been shaped and determined by particular historical, constitutional, political and economic trends. For many years the relationship between the Territories and the UK was rather ad hoc—a situation that can be traced back to the compromises, fudges and deals char- acteristic of ‘pragmatic’ British colonial administration. More recently, however, there have been attempts by the Labour government in Britain to overcome the informal nature of the relationship and to develop a new partnership based on mutual obligations and responsibilities. The article describes the appli- cations of this more pro-active and coherent level of oversight and highlights how the principle of more forceful metropolitan control has taken hold. The article asserts that the Territories are now much more heavily integrated into the international system, having adopted either willingly or unwillingly a number of changes to their political, economic and social structures.
[Show full text]
National Ski Council Federation Newsbeat March 2021
National Ski Council Federation Newsbeat March 2021 Resorts Roll Out 2021—22 Pass Programs. Many are offering financing options and carrying over Covid- related assurances. Prices seem to be holding steady and even rising, although a number of resorts are adding value, like spring access and reciprocal tickets, and offering discounts to renewing passholders. More. SAM IKON Pass Program for 2021-22 Shows Few Changes. Now encompassing 44 resorts, the primary options are the Ikon Pass, the more limited Ikon Base Pass, and four-day Ikon Session Pass. The first two come with many of the same benefits as for 2020-21, too. More. SAM The Five Types of Northeast Ski Season Passes. They’re here a bit later than in previous years and are, (mostly) a bit more expensive than they were last season, but they also include, in general, a few more perks. More. The Storm Skiing Journal Indy Pass Adds Waterville Valley (NH) and Saddleback (ME). Both resorts will provide two days of skiing and riding to all Indy Pass holders during the remainder of the 20-21 and the 21-22 seasons. More. SAM Four Ways Travel Will Be Different in 2021, According to Airbnb. More car trips. Fewer far-flung destinations. A little less oversharing. Here’s how travel could look different on the other side of the pandemic. More. Fast Company via Intopia | Destimetrics Airline Industry Set for COVID Comeback, But It Will Be a Slow Climb. The Kiplinger Letter forecasts leisure travel will soar past business travel, but air travel demand won't reach pre-pandemic levels until as late as 2024.
[Show full text]
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 9, 2021 Dallas County Reports 265 New Positive 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Cases and 31 Deaths
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 9, 2021 Dallas County Reports 265 New Positive 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Cases and 31 Deaths, Including 14 Probable Cases DALLAS -- As of 2:00 pm March 9, 2021 Dallas County Health and Human Services is reporting 265 additional positive cases of 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in Dallas County, 251 confirmed cases and 14 probable cases. There is a cumulative total of 248,225 confirmed cases (PCR test). There is a cumulative total of 36,710 probable cases (antigen test). A total of 3,180 Dallas County residents have lost their lives due to COVID-19 illness. Dallas County Health and Human Services (DCHHS) is providing initial vaccinations to those most at risk of exposure to COVID-19 and over 132,000 total doses of COVID-19 vaccine have been administered at the Fair Park mega-vaccine clinic, which started operations on Monday, January 11. At Fair Park, first doses through the Community Vaccination Center and second doses through DCHHS will continue this week. The additional deaths being reported today include the following: A man in his 50’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. He had been critically ill in an area hospital and had underlying high risk health conditions. A man in his 50’s who was a resident of the City of Garland. He expired in hospice and had underlying high risk health conditions. A man in his 50’s who was a resident of the City of Dallas. He had been hospitalized and had underlying high risk health conditions.
[Show full text]