From: David Allen 29 October, 2016, Mathematician, IT-Security Expert and Inventor of Things

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From: David Allen 29 October, 2016, Mathematician, IT-Security Expert and Inventor of Things From: David Allen 29 October, 2016, Mathematician, IT-Security Expert and Inventor of Things To: Committee Secretary, Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters PO Box 6021, Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600 Dear JSP, Thank you for inviting me to comment on this election which was run in pretty much the same way that has been used for several recent elections. The multi-trillion dollar size of our External Debt and Total Debt necessitate a detailed analysis of this election. Yours Sincerely David Allen Independent for Wentworth. A. Introduction Terms of Reference 1. All aspects of the 2016 Federal election and matters related thereto, and without limiting the scope of the committee's inquiry, with particular reference to: (a) The application of provisions requiring authorisation of electoral material to all forms of communication to voters; Response: Allen stood as an independent candidate for Wentworth, focusing on potential improvements to the Australian Constitution. The AEC did an excellent job in Wentworth, NSW and probably throughout Australia, although international lobbyists and IT-lobbyists complained that it took too long to count the votes. (b) The potential applicability of ‘truth in advertising' provisions to communication to voters including third-party carriage services; Response: It was difficult to discern very much ‘truth in advertising’ during this election and this mirrors the type of advertising that Australians have grown used to in recent decades. It appears that important sections of Justice Gleeson’s Rule of Law may have been negated and that numerous sections of the Australian Constitution may have been violated. It appears that ‘democratic’ elections are run by international advisers who may never have read the constitutions of the country they happen to be in for a particular election. This may at least partially explain why there appeared to be so many deviations from the Australian Constitution in this and in previous elections. The bulk of this document is devoted to evaluating various policies and outcomes against the standards set by the Australian and State Constitutions. Much of the information about issues such as the Economy (which is not the GDP), IT-Security, Energy Prices and same sex marriage appear to be at least partially incorrect. A sudden South Australian electricity price surge in July and the ensuing state wide blackout a few weeks later illustrate this point. Secondly the amount of internet traffic on Census night was almost certainly not sufficient to crash the system. IT-systems are now intrinsically unreliable as web-pages and email-addresses pop into and out of existence spontaneously and reports from newspapers may be blocked ‘for our security’. (c) The options available to Parliament to ensure consistent application of disclosure rules to and the regulation of all entities undertaking campaign activities; Response: Tools and techniques that are available to international fraudsters have become quite sophisticated in recent ‘transparent’ decades. As an example, Allen had destroyed the scientific case for a Thorium nuclear reactor during the 2007 Federal Election. Not to be deterred, the sponsors again put Thorium onto the agenda for the 2013 Federal election and he again destroyed it. While Thorium was mostly but not completely missing-in-action for the 2016 Federal election, other old chestnuts were recycled in the most ‘transparent’ manner. The bulk of this document is devoted to evaluating various policies and outcomes against the standards set by the Australian and State Constitutions and by Gleeson’s Rule of Law. and, (d) The potential application of new technology to voting, scrutiny and counting, with particular reference to its application to remote voting, ADF personnel on deployment and supporting vision-impaired voters. Response: Allen is a technology ‘expert’ from way back and has achieved numerous professional successes both at home and abroad in this area. Some voters had access to electronic voting in this election and the world did not come to an end. However recent outages by the Australian Bureau of Statistics and the Australian Stock Exchange show just how vulnerable Australian Information-technology is and he addresses this issue in the body of the document. If votes online are collected, counting them would be a breeze and scrutinizing them would be impossible as the computer-system itself is the only reference point. It is possible to devise a better online voting system but ‘experts’ may perhaps have advised us that this is not necessary and a secure system will never be implemented. 2. The extent of donations and contributions from foreign sources, persons, entities and foreign-owned subsidiaries to political parties, associated entities and other third parties and entities undertaking campaign activities, and the options available to Parliament to regulate these. Response: So much ‘hot’ money flows into Australia that it is impossible for either Parliament or the AFP to determine its destination and time-of-residence in Australia. In a sense, it does not matter who is elected as overseas-experts rather than Parliamentarians may determine the way in which Australian electioneering money is spent. Media reports may indicate that ‘hot’ money flows into organizations such as real-estate agents who may exert considerable influence in determining both pre-selection for and elected to LGA, State and Federal Parliaments. Some political advisers attempted to make State donations available to their Federal party during the 2016 election. This is one of the many areas that have received positive post-election suggestions for improvement, although such suggestions are notoriously difficult to implement. 3. The current donations, contributions, expenditure and disclosure regime, its application and timeliness and alternative approaches available to Parliament. Response: Donations come in different guises and providing ‘expert advice’ appears to be one of the more successful strategies. Any reasonably intelligent person associated with Australian Business or Government may promote themselves to the status of ‘expert’ after careful grooming by an international person with a reputation and a vested-interest in areas such as Computer Security, Energy Usage and Privatization, Finance, Fiscal Matters, Monetary Matters, Cloud Computing, Information Technology, Defense and a whole raft of other matters such as Water management and Agriculture. Confucius and Aristotle would not have been the first writers to describe how flattery can be successfully employed to seduce Business and Government officials with a lot of money at their disposal. Most people employed by or elected to Government would consider themselves to be IT-Security-experts, although all lack the years of detailed technical experience that are necessary to produce such complex skills. 4. The extent to which fundraising and expenditure by third parties is conducted in concert with registered political parties and the applicability and utilisation of tax deductibility by entities involved in campaign activities. Response: It is very difficult for a political party to know which third parties are acting on their behalf, especially when they donate funds to both parties. This technique may have been successful in aligning the ‘economic’ policies of the parties as they focus on emotive issues rather than on debt. Emotive issues include heated debates on Gender, Climate, Crime and Gambling as most Australians have an opinion about the weather, gender, redsunder- thebeds and terrorists. There was no need to worry Australians about the state of the economy, although the Budget-deficit was mentioned and this deficit is still growing in 2016. A disproportionate amount of time and money were spent on trying to get voters to accept an unConstitutional approach to same sex marriage and much of the material that was presented did not appear to be factually correct. Australians do not much care for the massive amount legislation that is inflicted upon them and almost all such legislation would not be accepted in a Referendum. It is almost two decades since Australians last supported a topic in a national Referendum and politicians avoid them like the plague. This document focuses on aspects of this election that may perhaps be unconstitutional, with same sex marriage perhaps being only one example. 5. Any matters related to the terms outlined above. Allen is writing to indicate that he believes the 2016 Federal Election is being conducted in a way that benefits neither the people of Australia nor the National Economy. Debt is the key issue that will affect succeeding generations. In the past 2 decades we have exported an enormous amount of irreplaceable minerals, generating extra debt that is twice the value of the exported materials. Australia never ever needed a GST from Keating, Hewson and Howard as our economy was strong. Since then, our economic standing has plummeted, showing that the GST does not work for Australia and for other countries. Making no effort to evaluate the GST’s effect, Australia implemented a convoluted scheme to raise GST percentages this election, showing yet again that we have a dysfunctional system of government. A recent ABC survey shows that about 42% of Australians believe we have an effective system of democracy. Allen also stood as Independent for Wentworth to highlight some of his unpaid successes for Australia, proposing a new way forward. This new way relies on the Magna Carta’s principles to limit both the power of Federal Government and the ability of Government to raise T-axes during times of peace. The new form of Government would rotate in a way that is similar to the European way. The PM has provided some support for two aspects of this plan and some Premiers were supportive of parts of it when it was discussed in COAG on the first of April 2016. T-axes rise during each election and this is followed by increased levels of spend and Debt, Debt, Debt. While Australia’s economy compares favourably with the economy of some countries that have practically no resources, we are a basket case when compared to countries that manage their resources prudently.
Recommended publications
  • Procedural Digest No. 25 45Th Parliament
    HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES November/December 2018 M T W T F Procedural Digest 26 27 28 29 30 No. 25 3 4 5 6 7 45th Parliament 26 November – 6 December 2018 Selected entries contain links to video footage via Parlview. Please note that the first time you click a [Watch] link, you may need to refresh the page (ctrl+F5) for the correct starting point. Bills 25.01 Opposition amendments ruled out of order During consideration in detail of the Fair Work Amendment (Family and Domestic Violence Leave) Bill 2018, the Shadow Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations, by leave, moved 18 opposition amendments to the bill. The Deputy Speaker ruled that the opposition amendments were out of order as they were not within the title or relevant to the subject matter of the bill. In response to points of order from the Manager of Opposition Business and the Leader of the House, the Speaker, having taken the Chair, made a statement in support of the Deputy Speaker’s ruling. Consideration in detail concluded and the bill was passed by the House. Hansard: 4 December 2018, 12465-70 Votes and Proceedings: 2018/2009 SO 150 25.02 Consideration of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Prohibiting Energy Market Misconduct) Bill 2018 On Wednesday 5 December, the Treasurer presented the Treasury Laws Amendment (Prohibiting Energy Market Misconduct) Bill 2018. The Treasurer’s second reading speech was interrupted at 1.30 pm for Members’ Statements and he was granted leave to continue his speech at a later hour. Later, the Treasurer completed his speech and, in accordance with standing order 142, the debate was adjourned to a future sitting.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly
    6545 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Wednesday 25 February 2004 ______ Mr Speaker (The Hon. John Joseph Aquilina) took the chair at 10.00 a.m. Mr Speaker offered the Prayer. AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT Mr Speaker announced the receipt, pursuant to section 52A of the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983, of the report entitled "New South Wales Auditor-General's Report—Financial Audits—Volume One 2004". Ordered to be printed. STRATA SCHEMES MANAGEMENT AMENDMENT BILL Second Reading Debate resumed from 4 December 2003. Ms KATRINA HODGKINSON (Burrinjuck) [10.00 a.m.]: The Opposition will not oppose the Strata Schemes Management Amendment Bill. However, during consultation stakeholders raised a number of concerns about several aspects of the bill and the way in which some of its provisions will impact on strata management practices. I will read onto the Parliamentary record a collection of the stakeholders' comments about the proposed legislation. I take the opportunity to thank the many stakeholders who were contacted for their response to the legislation, in particular, the Property Owners Association of New South Wales for its detailed submission and the Institute for Strata Title Management Ltd and the Retirement Village Residents Association for their respective submissions. Strata living is an important feature of a considerable segment of the State's population. The Strata Titles Act and its successor, the Strata Schemes Management Act, were designed to deal with relatively small blocks of units for a group of residents who were able to manage the property, often assisted by a strata managing agent. Such residents are now called an "executive committee" in this bill.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caretaker Election
    26. The Results and the Pendulum Malcolm Mackerras The two most interesting features of the 2010 election were that it was close and it was an early election. Since early elections are two-a-penny in our system, I shall deal with the closeness of the election first. The early nature of the election does, however, deserve consideration because it was early on two counts. These are considered below. Of our 43 general elections so far, this was the only one both to be close and to be an early election. Table 26.1 Months of General Elections for the Australian House of Representatives, 1901–2010 Month Number Years March 5 1901,1983, 1990, 1993, 1996 April 2 1910, 1951 May 4 1913, 1917, 1954, 1974 July 1 1987 August 2 1943, 2010 September 4 1914, 1934, 1940, 1946 October 6 1929, 1937, 1969, 1980, 1998, 2004 November 7 1925, 1928, 1958, 1963, 1966, 2001, 2007 December 12 1903, 1906, 1919, 1922, 1931, 1949, 1955, 1961, 1972, 1975, 1977, 1984 Total 43 The Close Election In the immediate aftermath of polling day, several commentators described this as the closest election in Australian federal history. While I can see why people would say that, I describe it differently. As far as I am concerned, there have been 43 general elections for our House of Representatives of which four can reasonably be described as having been close. They are the House of Representatives plus half-Senate elections held on 31 May 1913, 21 September 1940, 9 December 1961 and 21 August 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Redistribution of New South Wales Into Electoral Divisions FEBRUARY 2016
    Redistribution of New South Wales into electoral divisions FEBRUARY 2016 Report of the augmented Electoral Commission for New South Wales Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Feedback and enquiries Feedback on this report is welcome and should be directed to the contact officer. Contact officer National Redistributions Manager Roll Management Branch Australian Electoral Commission 50 Marcus Clarke Street Canberra ACT 2600 Locked Bag 4007 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone: 02 6271 4411 Fax: 02 6215 9999 Email: [email protected] AEC website www.aec.gov.au Accessible services Visit the AEC website for telephone interpreter services in 18 languages. Readers who are deaf or have a hearing or speech impairment can contact the AEC through the National Relay Service (NRS): – TTY users phone 133 677 and ask for 13 23 26 – Speak and Listen users phone 1300 555 727 and ask for 13 23 26 – Internet relay users connect to the NRS and ask for 13 23 26 ISBN: 978-1-921427-44-2 © Commonwealth of Australia 2016 © State of New South Wales 2016 The report should be cited as augmented Electoral Commission for New South Wales, Redistribution of New South Wales into electoral divisions. 15_0526 The augmented Electoral Commission for New South Wales (the augmented Electoral Commission) has undertaken a redistribution of New South Wales. In developing and considering the impacts of the redistribution, the augmented Electoral Commission has satisfied itself that the electoral divisions comply with the requirements of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (the Electoral Act). The augmented Electoral Commission commends its redistribution for New South Wales. This report is prepared to fulfil the requirements of section 74 of the Electoral Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedural Digest 10 11 12 13 14
    HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES September 2018 M T W T F Procedural Digest 10 11 12 13 14 No. 23 17 18 19 20 21 45th Parliament 10 – 20 September 2018 Selected entries contain links to video footage via Parlview. Please note that the first time you click a [Watch] link, you may need to refresh the page (ctrl+F5) for the correct starting point. Bills 23.01 Response to contamination of strawberries and other fruits; bill introduced and passes all stages On Wednesday 19 September, during his answer to a question without notice, the Prime Minister referred to recent cases of food contamination across Australia. He advised that the Government would be introducing legislation to increase penalties for food tampering. The Leader of the Opposition, by indulgence, made a brief statement in support of the Prime Minister’s remarks. The following morning the Attorney-General, pursuant to notice, presented the Criminal Code Amendment (Food Contamination) Bill 2018 and made a second reading speech. Leave was granted for the second reading debate to continue immediately. The Manager of Opposition Business advised that speakers had been asked to keep their speeches within a reasonable time frame, on the understanding that it was the intention of the House to pass the bill that morning. Several Members spoke to the bill and the Prime Minister summed up the debate. The question that the bill be read a second time was then put and carried on the voices. Leave was granted for the third reading to be moved immediately and on the motion of the Attorney-General, the bill was read a third time.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives
    vii 1946-47-48. ALPHABETICAL LIST OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. FIRST SESSION OF THE EIGHTEENTH PARLIAMENT. (Sittings-From6th November, 1946, to 18th June, 1948.) (Parliamentprorogued 4th August, 1948.) [NOTE.-For return of Voting at General Election, see Parliamentary Paper No. 12 of Session 1948-49, Vol. V., p. 137.] Name. Division. State. Abbott, Hon. Joseph Palmer, M.C. New England New South Wales Adermann, Charles Frederick, Esquire Maranoa . Queensland Anthony, Hon. Hubert Lawrence Richmond . New South Wales Barnard, Hon. Herbert Claude .. Bass Tasmania Beale, Oliver Howard, Esquire .. Parramatta New South Wales Beazley, Kim Edward, Esquire .. Fremantle . Western Australia Blackburn, Mrs. Doris Amelia Bourke Victoria Blain, Adair Macalister, Esquire Northern Territory Bowden, George James, Esquire, M.C. Gippsland Victoria Brennan, Hon. Frank .. Batman Victoria Burke, Thomas Patrick, Esquire Perth Western Australia Calwell, Hon. Arthur Augustus .. Melbourne Victoria Cameron, Hon. Archie Galbraith Barker South Australia Chambers, Hon. Cyril . Adelaide South Australia Chifley, Rt. Hon. Joseph Benedict Macquarie.. New South Wales Clark, Joseph James, Esquire, Chairman of Darling New South Wales Committees Conelan, William Patrick, Esquire Griffith Queensland Corser, Bernard Henry, Esquire Wide Bay Queensland Daly, Frederick Michael, Esquire Martin New South Wales Davidson, Charles William, Esquire, O.B.E. Capricornia Queensland Dedman, Hon. John Johnstone .. Corio Victoria Drakeford, Hon, Arthur Samuel Maribyrnong Victoria Duthie, Gilbert William Arthur, Esquire Wilmot Tasmania Edmonds, William Frederick, Esquire Herbert ., Queensland Evatt, Rt, Hon. Herbert Vere, K.C. Barton New South Wales Fadden, Rt. Hon. Arthur William Darling Downs Queensland Falkinder, Charles William Jackson, Franklin Tasmania Esquire, D.S.O., D.F.C. Falstein, Sydney Max, Esquire .
    [Show full text]
  • Comment on Public Suggestion
    COMMENT ON PUBLIC SUGGESTION The Federal Redistribution 2009 NSW Comment on Public Suggestion Number 13 by Liberal Party of Australia NSW Division 13 Pages ?009 • LIBERAL NEW SOUTH WALES Page: 2 I·r-; I i , - I Liberal Party of Australia (NSW Division) , , .... ­ May 15,2009 The Redistribution Committee for New South Wales Level 4, Roden Cutler House 24 Campbell Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 Dear Committee Members, It is my pleasure to submit Comments on behalf of the Liberal Party of Australia (New South Wales Division). I would like to express our appreciation to the staff of the Australian Electoral Commission for the assistance they have provided throughout the redistribution process. If you require any further information relating to our suggestions or comments, please don't hesitate to contact me on (02) 8356 0300. Yours sincerely, Mark Neeham State Director _•. LIBERAL IIW sourH lUllS Level 9,140William Street, East Sydney Mail: Locked Bag 2, Kings Cross NSW 1340 Tel : (02)8356 0300 Fax: (02)9331 2349 Email: [email protected] .org .au South Wales Division) , EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In our suggestions to the Redistribution Committee, the Liberal Party of Australia (NSW Division) acknowledged there must be changes in seats where growth and/or current enrolments are low, with consequential changes to other seats. However, it is our belief that a proposal that minimises unnecessary change best complies with the 'letter' and 'spirit ' of the Act . In submissions by the Liberal Party of Australia (NSW Division) and the Liberal National Party of Queensland to the Redistribution Committees in New South Wales and Queensland respectively, our suggested boundaries mean a notional net loss of one seat to the Coalition in NSW and a notional net gain of one seat to the Liberal National Party of Queensland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian German Association Invites You to Lunch with the Hon Malcolm Turnbull MP
    The Australian German Association invites you to lunch with The Hon Malcolm Turnbull MP. Malcolm Turnbull has been a member of the Australian House of Representatives since 2004, and was Leader of the Opposition and parliamentary leader of the Liberal Party from 16 September 2008 to 1 December 2009. He currently serves as the Shadow Minister for Communications and Broadband. Turnbull has represented the Division of Wentworth in Sydney's Eastern suburbs since his election in October 2004. He served as the federal Minister for Environment and Water Resources in 2007. Before entering parliamentary politics he practiced as a journalist, barrister, company legal counsel, and merchant banker, and was leader of the Australian Republican Movement. Date Wednesday 3 October 2012 Time 12.30 pm for 12.45 pm start, concluding at 2.15 pm Venue Union University & Schools Club Level 2, 26 Bent Street Sydney NSW 2000 SVP By Monday 1 October 2012 (Booking form attached) Fax: 1300 365 323 Email: [email protected] Registration Form Event: Lunch with Malcolm Turnbull: 3 October 2012 Registration Details: Full name: ___________________________________________________________________________ Company: ___________________________________________________________________________ Email: ______________________________________________________________________________ I shall be accompanied by: Full name: ___________________________________________________________________________ Company: ___________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Redistribution of the New South Wales Into Electoral Divisions
    Proposed redistribution of New South Wales into electoral divisions OCTOBER 2015 Report of the Redistribution Committee for New South Wales Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Feedback and enquiries Feedback on this report is welcome and should be directed to the contact officer. Contact officer National Redistributions Manager Roll Management Branch Australian Electoral Commission 50 Marcus Clarke Street Canberra ACT 2600 PO Box 6172 Kingston ACT 2604 Telephone: 02 6271 4411 Fax: 02 6215 9999 Email: [email protected] AEC website www.aec.gov.au Accessible services Visit the AEC website for telephone interpreter services in 18 languages. Readers who are deaf or have a hearing or speech impairment can contact the AEC through the National Relay Service (NRS): – TTY users phone 133 677 and ask for 13 23 26 – Speak and Listen users phone 1300 555 727 and ask for 13 23 26 – Internet relay users connect to the NRS and ask for 13 23 26 ISBN: 978-1-921427-38-1 © Commonwealth of Australia 2015 © State of New South Wales 2015 The report should be cited as Redistribution Committee for the New South Wales, Proposed redistribution of New South Wales into electoral divisions. 15_0526 The Redistribution Committee for New South Wales (the Committee) has completed its proposed redistribution of New South Wales into 47 electoral divisions. In developing and considering the impacts of the redistribution proposal, the Committee has satisfied itself that the proposed boundaries meet the requirements of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Electoral Act). The Committee unanimously agreed on the boundaries and names of the proposed electoral divisions, and recommends its redistribution proposal for New South Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond-Tweed Family History Society
    Richmond-Tweed Family History Society Inc - Catalogue Call No Title Author Nv-1Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Aston Nv-2Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Ballarat Nn-15Y 1984 Electoral roll : Division of Banks Nn-14Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Barton Nt-1Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Bass Nv-3Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Batman Nv-4Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Bendigo Nn-12Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Berowra Nn-11Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Blaxland Ns-4Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Boothby Nq-1Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Bowman Nt-2Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Braddon Nn-16Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Bradfield Nw-1Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Brand Nq-2Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Brisbane Nv-5Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Bruce Nv-6Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Burke Nv-7Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Calwell Nw-2Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Canning Nq-3Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Capricornia Nv-8Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Casey Nn-17Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Charlton Nn-23Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Chifley Nv-9Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Chisholm 06 October 2012 Page 1 of 167 Call No Title Author Nn-22Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Cook Nv-10Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Corangamite Nv-11Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Corio Nw-3Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Cowan Nn-21Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Cowper Nn-20Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Cunningham
    [Show full text]
  • Download the AEC Annual Report 2018–19
    2018 ANNUAL REPORT ii / © Commonwealth of Australia 2019 ISSN: 0814–4508 Unless otherwise noted, the Australian Electoral Commission has applied the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence to this publication with the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the AEC’s logos, the AEC’s maps and content supplied by third parties. Use of material subject to the licence must not assert or imply any connection with or endorsement by the AEC unless with express prior written permission. The commission asserts the right of recognition as author of the original material. The publication should be attributed as Australian Electoral Commission Annual Report 2018–19. The term ‘Indigenous’ in this report refers to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people unless otherwise stated. This report may contain the names and images of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people now deceased. Produced by: Australian Electoral Commission Printed by: Elect Printing Annual report contact officer Director, Resource Management Section Australian Electoral Commission 50 Marcus Clarke Street Canberra ACT 2600 Contact phone number: 02 6271 4648 Contact email: [email protected] AEC website: www.aec.gov.au Location of report: https://annualreport.aec.gov.au/2019 Make an online enquiry www.aec.gov.au/enquiry Accessible services www.aec.gov.au/assistance for telephone interpreter services in multiple languages. Readers who are deaf or have a hearing or speech impairment can contact the AEC through the National Relay Service (NRS). • TTY users phone 13 36 77 and ask for 13 23 26 • Speak and Listen users phone 1300 555 727 and ask for 13 23 26 • Internet relay users connect to the NRS and ask for 13 23 26 This publication is printed on an uncoated 30% recycled, FSC© certified carbon neutral paper.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Carriage Returns, 16 Pt Garamond
    Shocking the Suburbs: Urban Location, Housing Debt and Oil Vulnerability in the Australian City Author Dodson, Jago, Sipe, Neil Published 2006 Copyright Statement © The Author(s) 2006 Griffith University. For information about this monograph please refer to the publisher's website or contact the authors. The attached file is reproduced here with permission of the copyright owner for your personal use only. No further distribution permitted. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/12665 Link to published version http://www.griffith.edu.au/ Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Shocking the Suburbs: Urban Location, Housing Debt and Oil Vulnerability in the Australian City Jago Dodson and Neil Sipe Urban Research Program Research Paper 8 July 2006 Shocking the Suburbs: Urban location, housing debt and oil vulnerability in the Australian City Jago Dodson and Neil Sipe Urban Research Program Research Paper 8 June 2006 The Urban Research Program acknowledges the generous support provided by Brisbane City Council for production of the Program’s Issues and Research Papers. © Jago Dodson and Neil Sipe ISBN 1 920952 68 3 Urban Research Program Griffith University Brisbane, QLD 4111 www.griffith.edu.au/centre/urp ii iii URBAN RESEARCH PROGRAM The Urban Research Program (URP) was established in 2003 as strategic research and community engagement initiative of Griffith University. The strategic foci of the Urban Research Program are research and advocacy in an urban regional context. The Urban Research Program seeks to improve understanding of, and develop innovative responses to Australia’s urban challenges and opportunities by conducting and disseminating research, advocating new policy directions, and by providing training assistance.
    [Show full text]