DOCSLIB.ORG

The University of Texas at Austin CE 357 Geotechnical Engineering 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The University of Texas at Austin CE 357 Geotechnical Engineering 1 The University of Texas at Austin CE 357 Geotechnical Engineering CE 357 Geotechnical Engineering Spring 2020 Instructor: Dr. Brady R. Cox, P.E. ECJ 9.227F 512-471-9162; [email protected] Office Hours: MW 4:00-6:00 PM and T 4:00-6:00 PM Lectures: MWF 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM in ECJ 1.204 MWF 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM in ECJ 1.314 Laboratories: Labs associated with 11:00 AM course Unique #15475: TH 8:00-11:00 in ECJ B.140 Unique #15480: M 12:00-3:00 in ECJ B.140 Unique #15485: M 3:00-6:00 in ECJ B.140 Unique #15490: W 3:00-6:00 in ECJ B.140 Labs associated with 3:00 PM course Unique #15495: F 12:00-3:00 in ECJ B.140 Unique #15500: T 3:00-6:00 in ECJ B.140 Unique #15505: TH 3:00-6:00 in ECJ B.140 Teaching Assistants: Names and office hours for teaching assistants will be provided in each laboratory section Textbook: (Required) Das, Braja and Khaled Sobhan. Principles of Geotechnical Engineering – 8th or 9th Edition. Cengage Learning, 2016 Lab Manual: (Required) Daniel, David E., and the Geotechnical Engineering Faculty and Staff, Laboratory Manual for CE 357 – Geotechnical Engineering (Available at the UT Co-Op). Materials: The basics… engineering paper, calculator, straight edge, compass and protractor. Prerequisites: Engineering Mechanics 319 - Mechanics of Solids Civil Engineering 319F - Elementary Mechanics of Fluids Course Description: A major specialty area within civil engineering, geotechnical engineering focuses on how soil and rock support and affect the performance of structures built on or below the earth's surface. This course will introduce the student to the basic principles that govern the behavior of soils, foundations, and other geotechnical engineering works. The central concepts to be covered in this course are: (a) Composition and classification of soils; (b) Engineering soil properties and their measurement; (c) Soil permeability and pore water movement; (d) Stresses in soil and the effective stress concept; (e) Soil compressibility, consolidation, and settlements; and (f) Shear strength of soil and bearing capacity. 1 The University of Texas at Austin CE 357 Geotechnical Engineering An understanding of these basic concepts is essential in the design of foundations for structures, retaining walls, tunnels, excavations, earth fills, dams, pavements, stable earth slopes, landfills, and environmental remediation projects. The laboratory component of this course will provide hands-on experience with characterizing soils for engineering purposes and help to familiarize the student with ASTM geotechnical laboratory testing procedures and standards. Course Objectives: A student completing this course should be able to: 1. Solve problems related to weight-volume relationships for soil (i.e., determine void ratio, unit weight, water content, degree of saturation, etc…). 2. Classify soils according to the USCS system using grain size distribution data and Atterberg Limits. 3. List appropriate drilling, sampling and in-situ soil property measurement tools for different types of soil and rock. 4. Calculate the flow rate of water through soils and explain how permeability and head loss influence flow rate. 5. Determine total stresses, pore water pressures, and effective stresses for in-situ soils. 6. Explain how negative pore water pressures and upward or downward seepage influence the effective stress in a soil mass. 7. Explain the relationship between dry density and water content in regards to soil compaction. 8. Estimate the magnitude (settlement) and time rate of primary consolidation for clay soils. 9. Solve for the state of stress on any plane in a soil mass using the principles of Mohr’s Circle. 10. Describe the Mohr-Coulomb failure criteria for soils, including the two distinct parameters that influence soil shear strength (c and ). 11. Evaluate the bearing capacity of shallow foundations on clay soils and sandy soils. 12. Predict the vertical stress increase caused by foundation loads at various locations in a soil mass using Boussinesq-type stress distribution solutions. 13. Estimate the settlement of shallow foundations on clay soils and sandy soils. 14. Summarize the fundamental differences in the engineering behavior of sand- and clay-type soils (in terms of permeability, compaction, consolidation/settlement, shear strength, etc…) Additionally, students successfully completing this course will acquire the background knowledge needed to complete more advanced courses in geotechnical engineering (i.e., CE 360K - Foundation Engineering, CE 375 - Earth Slopes and Retaining Structures, as well as courses at the graduate level) and improve their professional engineering skills, including the presentation of technical data and written communications. Course Grading: Class Assignments: 20% Laboratory Assignments: 20% Mid-term Examination 30% Final Examination (comprehensive) 30% Total 100% The plus/minus grading scale will be used when assigning letter grades. A minimum exam average of 50% is required to pass the course. Students who miss an examination will receive a grade of zero on that exam. Exceptions to this rule will be made only on a carefully considered basis, and only if 2 The University of Texas at Austin CE 357 Geotechnical Engineering the student contacts the professor before the exam. Laboratory attendance is also mandatory in order to pass the course. The lab attendance policy is further explained in the Laboratory section, below. Course Attendance: Students are expected to attend all class periods and must attend all laboratory periods. Those who fail to attend class regularly will struggle to perform well on the course examinations. Students are responsible for material identified in the readings and covered in class, even if absent from class for authorized activities. Course Assignments: Homework assignments will generally be assigned each week and will be due at the beginning of class on the date specified. Late assignments will be accepted if turned in within 24 hours of the original due date/time. However, the score on any late assignments will be reduced by 20%. An assignment will be considered late after assignments have been collected at the beginning of class. In order to get credit for an assignment you must submit a hard copy (not an electronic copy) prior to the due date/time. This requirement also applies to receiving credit for late assignments. As you will quickly learn after college, most practicing engineers spend more time and effort communicating their ideas, analyses, and results than they do performing technical calculations. To encourage the development of these vital professional skills, your homework assignments may require a written response, and not just a simple numerical answer. In addition to engineering calculations, you might be asked to explain the important aspects of a problem, to identify the assumptions you have made, or to give some recommendations. Write your answers in paragraph form using good, technical English. When required, neatly draw all sketches and data plots using a straight edge, French curve, compass, etc., and show all relevant labels/units. As much as possible, I want your assignments to reflect real-world engineering practice where your submission to a client involves much more than calculations. Above all, present your results clearly and concisely so that someone else, who may be less knowledgeable than you are, could understand and apply your results correctly. At my discretion, I will give extra credit up to a maximum of 10% of the points for a homework assignment to students who submit neat, professional-looking assignments according to the sample homework format attached to this syllabus. Diligently completing homework assignments is the single most important factor in learning the course material. The effort put into performing and understanding your homework will certainly affect your final grade. Students may consult with each other regarding homework assignments. However, each student is responsible for understanding the principles behind the correct homework solution (not just the correct answer). Students are expected to report cheating issues to the professor. Cheating on homework assignments (i.e., blatantly copying another student’s work or a prior homework solution) will NOT be tolerated and at a minimum will result in: (1) a score of zero on the assignment, and (2) a reduction of 1/3 of a letter grade (e.g., from B to B-, or C+ to C) on the final grade earned in the course. If a student is caught cheating on a homework assignment, we will meet together and fill out the Faculty Referral/ Disposition Form found at the link provided below. This form will then be submitted to the Office of the Dean of Students. “An additional academic dishonesty violation could result in the student’s suspension or expulsion from the University.” http://deanofstudents.utexas.edu/conduct/downloads/FacultyReferralDispositionForm1819.pdf 3 The University of Texas at Austin CE 357 Geotechnical Engineering Course Examinations: There will be one, 2-hour mid-term examination given during the semester. This exam will be held outside of regular class hours to accommodate a single mid-term exam for both the 11AM and 3PM courses. The mid-term exam will take place from 7-9 PM on Thursday, March 26, 2020 in PAI 3.02. In addition to material covered in class lectures and homework assignments, exams may include questions from the laboratory portion of the class or from reading assignments. Course examinations will be closed-book and closed-notes. However, you will be permitted to bring one sheet (8.5 x 11 inch) of your own handwritten notes to each examination. The organizational effort required to do this is an effective means of reviewing the course content before the exam. In addition, you need to bring a calculator, straight edge, compass and protractor to the exams. Cell phones must be turned off and stored out of sight during exams.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of Nontraditional Soil and Aggregate Stabilizers the University of Texas at Austin Authors: Alan F
    CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN Project Summary Report 7-1993-S Center for Transportation Research Project 7-1993: Evaluation of Nontraditional Soil and Aggregate Stabilizers The University of Texas at Austin Authors: Alan F. Rauch, Lynn E. Katz, and Howard M. Liljestrand May 2003 EVALUATION OF NONTRADITIONAL SOIL AND AGGREGATE STABILIZERS: A SUMMARY and at ten times the recommended tography (GPC), UV/Vis spectroscopy, Introduction application rates. These tests failed to and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) Proprietary chemical products are show significant, consistent changes spectroscopy. In some cases, we syn- marketed by a number of companies for in the engineering properties of the thesized the stabilizer components in stabilizing pavement base and subgrade test soils following treatment with the the laboratory or purchased them from soils. Usually supplied as concentrated three selected products at the applica- other chemical supply companies to liquids, these products are diluted in tion rates used. verify our conclusions. water on the project site and sprayed The three stabilizer products were on the soil to be treated prior to mix- What We Did... then reacted with three reference clays ing and compaction. If effective, these We began by selecting three and five native Texas clay soils. We products might be used as alternatives commercially available, liquid soil tested samples of the well-character- for treating sulfate-rich soils, which are stabilizer products for evaluation. ized, reference clays (kaolinite, illite, susceptible to excessive heaving when Although no effort was made to as- and montmorillonite) to increase the treated with traditional, calcium-based semble and classify a comprehensive likelihood of observing subtle physi- stabilizers such as lime, cement, and fly list of available products and suppliers, cal-chemical changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Isotropic Work Softening Model for Frictional
    Yang, K.-H., Nogueira, C., and Zornberg, J.G. (2008). “Isotropic Work Softening Model for Frictional Geomaterials: Development Based on Lade and Kim soil Constitutive Model.” Proceedings of the XXIX Iberian Latin American Congress on Computational Methods in Engineering, CILAMCE 2008, Maceio, Brazil, November 4-7, pp. 1-17 (CD-ROM). ISOTROPIC WORK SOFTENING MODEL FOR FRICTIONAL GEOMATERIALS: DEVELOPMENT BASED ON LADE AND KIM CONSTITUTIVE SOIL MODEL Kuo-Hsin Yang [email protected] Dept. of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas, Austin, USA Christianne de Lyra Nogueira [email protected] Dept. of Mine Engineering, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil Jorge G. Zornberg [email protected] Dept. of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas, Austin, USA Abstract: An isotropic softening model for predicting the post-peak behavior of frictional geomaterials is presented. The proposed softening model is a function of plastic work which can include all possible stress-strain combinations. The development of softening model is based on the Lade and Kim constitutive soil model but improves previous work by characterizing the size of decaying yield surface more realistically by assuming an inverse sigmoid function. Compared to original softening model using the exponential decay function, the benefits of using the inverse sigmoid function are highlighted as: (1) provide a smoother transition from hardening to softening occurring at the peak strength point, and (2) limit the decrease of yield surface at a residual yield surface, which is a minimum size of yield surface during softening. The proposed softening model requires three parameters; each parameter has it own physical meaning and can be easily calibrated by a triaxial compression test.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Composts : Moisture Holding and Water Quality
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-04/0-4403-2 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date AUGUST 2003 CHARACTERISTICS OF COMPOSTS: MOISTURE HOLDING 6. Performing Organization Code AND WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Christine J. Kirchhoff, Dr. Joseph F. Malina, Jr., P.E., DEE, and Dr. 0-4403-2 Michael Barrett, P.E. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-4403 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Research Report Research and Technology Implementation Office 9/1/2001-8/31-2003 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and the Texas Department of Transportation. 16. Abstract The objective of this study was investigation of the potential beneficial use of compost manufactured topsoil in highway rights-of-way in Texas. The water holding capacity and the physical, chemical and microbiological characteristics of composted manures (dairy cattle, poultry litter, and feedlot), composted biosolids and sandy and clay soil; compost manufacture topsoil (CMT) that contained composted manures or composted biosolids mixed with either sandy soil or clay soil; as well as erosion control compost (ECC) that contained compost and wood chips were evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoysynthetic Reinforced Embankment Slopes Akshay Kumar Jha and Madhav Madhira
    Chapter Geoysynthetic Reinforced Embankment Slopes Akshay Kumar Jha and Madhav Madhira Abstract Slope failures lead to loss of life and damage to property. Slope instability of natural slope depends on natural and manmade factors such as excessive rainfall, earthquakes, deforestation, unplanned construction activity, etc. Manmade slopes are formed for embankments and cuttings. Steepening of slopes for construc- tion of rail/road embankments or for widening of existing roads is a necessity for development. Use of geosynthetics for steep slope construction considering design and environmental aspects could be a viable alternative to these issues. Methods developed for unreinforced slopes have been extended to analyze geosynthetic reinforced slopes accounting for the presence of reinforcement. Designing geosyn- thetic reinforced slope with minimum length of geosynthetics leads to economy. This chapter presents review of literature and design methodologies available for reinforced slopes with granular and marginal backfills. Optimization of reinforce- ment length from face end of the slope and slope - reinforcement interactions are also presented. Keywords: slopes, geosynthetics, reinforcement, optimization of length, marginal soils, steepening 1. Introduction Landslides in slopes and failures of embankment and cut slopes lead to loss of life and property. Several factors, natural and manmade, such as heavy rainfall, unplanned construction, deforestation, restricting waterways of rivers and their tributaries are major causes for instability of slopes. Factors controlling stability of natural slopes are type of soil, environmental conditions, groundwater, stress history, rainfall, cloud burst, earthquakes, etc. Landslide mortality rate exceeds one per 100 km2 per year in developing countries like India, China, Nepal, Peru, Venezuela, Philippines and Tajikistan [1, 2].
    [Show full text]
  • FHWA/TX-07/0-5202-1 Accession No
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-07/0-5202-1 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Determination of Field Suction Values, Hydraulic Properties, August 2005; Revised March 2007 and Shear Strength in High PI Clays 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jorge G. Zornberg, Jeffrey Kuhn, and Stephen Wright 0-5202-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-5202 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2004–August 2006 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Determination of Field Suction Values in High PI Clays for Various Surface Conditions and Drain Installations 16. Abstract Moisture infiltration into highway embankments constructed by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) using high Plasticity Index (PI) clays results in changes in shear strength and in flow pattern that leads to recurrent slope failures. In addition, soil cracking over time increases the rate of moisture infiltration. The overall objective of this research is to determine the suction, hydraulic properties, and shear strength of high PI Texas clays. Specifically, two comprehensive experimental programs involving the characterization of unsaturated properties and the shear strength of a high PI clay (Eagle Ford clay) were conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Mechanisms and Efficacy of Three Liquid Chemical Soil Stabilizers
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 1993-1 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-03/1993-1 (Volume 1) Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date AN ANALYSIS OF THE MECHANISMS AND EFFICACY May 2003 OF THREE LIQUID CHEMICAL SOIL STABILIZERS: VOLUME 1 7. Author(s) 6. Performing Organization Code Alan F. Rauch, Lynn E. Katz, and Howard M. Liljestrand 8. Performing Organization Report No. 1993-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin 11. Contract or Grant No. 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Research Project 7-1993 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Research Report Research and Technology Implementation Office 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P.O. Box 5080 Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project conducted in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract Liquid chemical products are marketed by a number of companies for stabilizing pavement base and subgrade soils. If effective, these products could be used as alternatives for treating sulfate-rich soils, which are susceptible to excessive heaving when treated with traditional, calcium-based stabilizers like lime, cement, and fly ash. However, the chemical composition, stabilizing mechanisms, and performance of these liquid products are not well understood. The primary objective of this study was to investigate and identify the mechanisms by which clay soils are modified or altered by these liquid chemical agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Slope Stability Charts
    The University of Texas Department of Civil Engineering Professor Stephen G. Wright SLOPE STABILITY - CHARTS OR STABILITY NUMBERS Bell, James M. (1966) "Dimensionless Parameters for Homogeneous Earth Slopes," Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 92, No. SM5, September, pp. 51-65. Bell, James M. (1968) Closure to "Dimensional Parameters for Homogeneous Earth Slopes," Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 94, No. SM3, May, pp. 763-766. Bishop, A.W. and Morgenstern, Norbert (1960) "Stability Coefficients for Earth Slopes," Geotechnique, Institution of Civil Engineers, London, Vol. 10, No. 4, December, pp. 129-150. Cousins, Brian F. (1978) "Stability Charts for Simple Earth Slopes," Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 104, No. GT2, February, pp. 267-279. Desai, Chandrakant S. (1977) "Drawdown Analysis of Slopes by Numerical Method," Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 103, No. GT7, July, pp. 667-676. Duncan, J.M. and Buchignani, A.L. (1975) An Engineering Manual for Slope Stability Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, March, 83 p. Ellis, Harold B. (1973) "Use of Cycloidal Arcs for Estimating Ditch Safety," Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 99, No. SM2, February, pp. 165-179. Giger, Max W. and Krizek, Raymond J. (1976) "Stability of Vertical Corner Cut with Concentrated Surcharge Load," Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 92, No. GT1, January, pp. 31-40. Huang, Yang H. (1977) "Stability Coefficients for Sidehill Benches," Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 103, No. GT5, May, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Reliability-Based Design for External Stability of Narrow Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls: Calibration from Centrifuge Tests
    Reliability-Based Design for External Stability of Narrow Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls: Calibration from Centrifuge Tests Kuo-Hsin Yang1; Jianye Ching, M.ASCE2; and Jorge G. Zornberg, M.ASCE3 Abstract: A narrow mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) wall is defined as a MSE wall placed adjacent to an existing stable wall, with a width less than that established in current guidelines. Because of space constraints and interactions with the existing stable wall, various studies have suggested that the mechanics of narrow walls differ from those of conventional walls. This paper presents the reliability-based design (RBD) for external stability (i.e., sliding and overturning) of narrow MSE walls with wall aspects L=H ranging from 0.2 to 0.7. The reduction in earth pressure pertaining to narrow walls is considered by multiplying a reduction factor by the conventional earth pressure. The probability distribution of the reduction factor is calibrated based on Bayesian analysis by using the results of a series of centrifuge tests on narrow walls. The stability against bearing capacity failure and the effect of water pressure within MSE walls are not calibrated in this study because they are not modeled in the centrifuge tests. An RBD method considering variability in soil parameters, wall dimensions, and traffic loads is applied to establish the relationship between target failure probability and the required safety factor. A design example is provided to illustrate the design procedure. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000423. © 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers. CE Database subject headings: Earth pressure; Centrifuge models; Walls; Soil structures; Calibration.
    [Show full text]
  • SIDEWALK CROSS-SLOPE DESIGN: ANALYSIS of October 2001 Rev
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-03/4171-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date SIDEWALK CROSS-SLOPE DESIGN: ANALYSIS OF October 2001 Rev. May 2002 ACCESSIBILITY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES 7. Author(s) 6. Performing Organization Code Kara M.Kockelman, Lydia Heard, Young-Jun Kweon, Thomas W. Rioux 8. Performing Organization Report No. 4171-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin 11. Contract or Grant No. 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 Research Project 0-4171 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Research Report Research and Technology Implementation Office 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P.O. Box 5080 Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and the Texas Department of Transportation. 16. Abstract Current and proposed Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines offer no specific guidance on acceptable maximum cross slopes where constraints of reconstruction prohibit meeting the 2-percent maximum cross-slope requirement for new construction. Two types of sidewalk test-section data across a sample of 50 individuals were collected, combined with an earlier sample of 17 records of participation, and analyzed here, with an emphasis on cross slopes. These examined heart-rate changes and user perception of discomfort levels, and they relied on a random-effects model and an ordered-probit model, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Compaction Requirements for Placement (1874-S)
    CENTER FOR TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN Center for Project Summary Report 1874-S Transportation Research Assessment of Cohesionless Materials to Be Used as Compacted Fill The University of Texas at Austin Authors: Stephen G. Wright, Brad J. Arcement, and Eric R. Marx Recommended Compaction Requirements for Placement of Uniform Fine Sand Backfill Materials Objective and Scope Particular attention was paid pacted using each of the to the laboratory compaction following compaction proce- of Project procedures used and the dures: The objective of this specifications for field • TxDOT Tx 113-E- project was to develop compaction. Laboratory Compaction recommendations for com- Selection of Soil for Testing Characteristics and paction of cohesionless soils TxDOT selected several Moisture-Density Rela- used as backfill materials. sources of cohesionless fill tionship of Base Materials The Texas Department of materials for testing and • ASTM D 1557-Labora- Transportation (TxDOT) evaluation. Initially, attention tory Compaction Charac- utilizes a number of sources was focused on the El Paso teristics of Soil Using of cohesionless soils as fill area where abundant sources Modified Effort materials for embankment of cohesionless fill materials • British Standard BS-1377 construction and as backfill are available and used. Nine -Vibrating Hammer for mechanically stabilized sources of fill material were Method earth (MSE) walls. Some identified in the El Paso area • ASTM D 4253-Maximum problems have been experi- and samples were obtained Index Density and Unit enced with these materials in for further laboratory testing. Weight of Soils Using a the past, especially with After the initial selection of Vibratory Table settlements of backfills soils from the El Paso area, All tests using the Tx behind retaining walls.
    [Show full text]
  • GMS 10.1 Tutorial UTEXAS – Dam with Seepage Use SEEP2D and UTEXAS to Model Seepage and Slope Stability of an Earth Dam
    v. 10.1 GMS 10.1 Tutorial UTEXAS – Dam with Seepage Use SEEP2D and UTEXAS to model seepage and slope stability of an earth dam Objectives Learn how to build an integrated SEEP2D/UTEXAS model in GMS. Prerequisite Tutorials Required Components Time • SEEP2D – Earth Dam • GIS • 25–40 minutes • UTEXAS – Natural Slope • Map Module • Mesh Module • SEEP2D • UTEXAS Page 1 of 16 © Aquaveo 2015 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Outline .......................................................................................................................... 3 2 Program Mode..................................................................................................................... 3 3 Getting Started .................................................................................................................... 3 4 Set the Units ......................................................................................................................... 4 5 Save the GMS Project File ................................................................................................. 4 6 Create the Conceptual Model Features ............................................................................. 5 6.1 Create the Points .......................................................................................................... 5 6.2 Create the Arcs and Polygons ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Slope Stability References Alonso, EE
    1 The University of Texas Department of Civil Engineering Professor Stephen G. Wright Slope Stability References Alonso, E. E., "Risk Analysis of Slopes and Its Application to Slopes in Canadian Sensitive Clays," Geotechnique, Great Britain, Vol. 26, No. 3, Sept., 1976, pp. 453-472. Baker, R., "Determination of the Critical Slip Surface in Slope Stability Computations," International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 4, No. 4, Oct.-Dec., 1980, pp. 333-359. Baligh, Mohsen, and Amr S. Azzouz, "End Effects on Stability of Cohesive Slopes," Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, No. GT11, Nov., 1975, pp. 1105-1117. Baligh, M. M., A. S. Azzouz, and C. C. Ladd, "Line Loads on Cohesive Slopes," Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, Vol. 2, 1977, pp. 13-16. Bazett, D.J., Adams, J.I. and Matyas, E.L. (1961) "An Investigation of Slides in a Test Trench Excavated in Fissured Sensitive Marine Clay," Proceedings, Fifth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 431-435. Beene, R.R.W. (1967) "Waco Dam Slide," Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 93, SM4, July, pp. 35-44. Bell, James M. (1966), "Dimensionless Parameters for Homogeneous Earth Slopes," Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 92, No. SM5, Sept., pp. 51-65. Bell, James M. ·(1968) "General Slope Stability Analysis," Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 94, No. SM6, November, pp. 1253-1270. Binger, W.V. (1948) "Analytical Studies of Panama Canal Slides," Proceedings, Second International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol.
    [Show full text]