PERSPECTIVES on Science and Christian Faith

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

PERSPECTIVES on Science and Christian Faith JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC AFFILIATION In This Issue … Surveying the Relationship between Views of Scripture and Attitudes toward Science The Overlooked Science of Genealogical Ancestry “Fallen” and “Broken” Reinterpreted in the Light of Evolution Theory The Nuts and Bolts of Creation “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of Wisdom.” Psalm 111:10 VOLUME 70, NUMBER 1 MARCH 2018 (US ISSN 0892-2675) (CPM #40927506) Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith Manuscript Guidelines © 2018 by the American Scientifi c Affi liation The pages of Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith (PSCF) are open Editor-in-Chief to original, unpublished contributions that interact with science and Christian J C. P (Roanoke College and faith in a manner consistent with scientifi c and theological integrity. A brief Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine) description of standards for publication in PSCF can be found in the lead 221 College Lane editorial of the December 2013 issue. This is available at www.asa3.org under Salem, VA 24153 publications PSCF index. Published papers do not refl ect any offi cial [email protected] position of the American Scientifi c Affi liation. 1. Submit all manuscripts to: James C. Peterson, Editor, Roanoke College, 221 College Lane, Salem, VA 24153. E-mail: [email protected]. Book Reviews Submissions are typically acknowledged within 10 days of their receipt. P F (Providence 2. Authors must submit an electronic copy of the manuscript formatted Theological Seminary), Editor in Word as an email attachment. Typically 2–3 anonymous reviewers 10 College Crescent critique each manuscript considered for publication. Otterburne, MB R0A 1G0 [email protected] 3. Use endnotes for all references. Each note must have a unique number. Follow The Chicago Manual of Style (16th ed., sections 14.1 to 14.317). Subject Area Editors 4. While fi gures and diagrams may be embedded within the Word text fi le A L (Calvin College) of the manuscript, authors are required to also send them as individual 1726 Knollcrest Circle SE electronic fi les (JPEG or PDF format). Figure captions should be provided Grand Rapids, MI 49546 as a list at the end of the manuscript text. [email protected] ARTICLES are major treatments of a particular subject relating science to a S S T (Northwestern College) Christian position. Such papers should be at least 2,000 words but not more 101 7th St SW than 8,000 words in length, excluding endnotes. An abstract of 50–150 Orange City, IA 51041 words is required and should be in both the text of the email submission and [email protected] at the beginning of the attached essay. Publication for such papers normally takes 9–12 months from the time of acceptance. D C. S (Calvin College) 3201 Burton St SE COMMUNICATIONS are brief treatments of a wide range of subjects of Grand Rapids, MI 49546 interest to PSCF readers. Communications must not be longer than 2700 [email protected] words, excluding endnotes. Communications are normally published 6–9 months from the time of acceptance. Editorial Board R B, Wheaton College BOOK REVIEWS serve both to alert readers to new books that appear D B, Gordon College signifi cant and to engage these books in critical interaction. When a subject E B. D, Messiah College area editor selects a book for review, the book is then off ered to a scholar O G, Harvard-Smithsonian Center with the best match in expertise. ASA/CSCA members who would like to be for Astrophysics considered as potential reviewers are welcome to express interest to the book S G. H, North Carolina State University review coordinating editor for inclusion in the reviewer database. Publishers R D. I, American Scientifi c Affi liation may also contact the book review coordinating editor if they are not sure D. G J, University of Otago which subject area reviewer would best consider a particular book. R K, Princeton University • Patrick Franklin ([email protected]): book review editor; subject D A. L, Massachusetts areas: ethics, philosophy, and theology. Institute of Technology T L III, Westmont College • Arie Leegwater ([email protected]): cosmology, history of science, K MF, The King’s University mathematics, and physical sciences. K B. M, Kansas State University • Sara Sybesma Tolsma ([email protected]): biology, environment, A G. P, Luther Seminary genetics, and origins. R P, Massachusetts Institute of • Derek Schuurman ([email protected]): computers, engineer- Technology ing, and technology. A S, Bethel University R S, Calvin College The viewpoints expressed in the books reviewed, and in the reviews J A. T, Trinity Western University themselves, are those of the authors and reviewers respectively, and do not D A. V, Harvey Mudd College of refl ect an offi cial position of the ASA. The Claremont Colleges D L. W, Eastern University LETTERS to the Editor concerning PSCF content may be published unless marked not for publication. Letters submitted for publication must not be longer than 700 words and will be subject to editorial review. Letters are Managing Editor to be submitted as electronic copies. Letters accepted for publication will be L B (American Scientifi c Affi liation) published within 6 months. 218 Boston Street, Suite 208 Topsfi eld, MA 01983 ADVERTISING is accepted in PSCF, subject to editorial approval. Please [email protected] address inquiries for rates or further information to the Managing Editor. The ASA cannot take responsibility for any orders placed with advertisers Manuscript Editor in PSCF and does not imply endorsement by carrying the ad. E M AUTHORIZATION TO PHOTOCOPY MATERIAL for internal, personal, or Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith educational classroom use, or the internal or personal use of specifi c clients, (USPS 28-3740, ISSN 0892-2675) is published is granted by ASA, ISSN: 0892-2675, provided that the appropriate fee is quarterly by American Scientifi c Affi liation, 218 Boston paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Street Suite 208, Topsfi eld, MA 01983. Periodicals Danvers, MA 01923 USA for conventional use, or check CCC online at the postage paid at Topsfi eld, MA, and additional mailing following address: www.copyright.com/. No registration with CCC is needed: offi ce. POSTMASTER: Send address changes simply identify the article being copied, the number of copies, and the journal to: Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, title (Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith). For those who wish to 218 Boston Street Suite 208, Topsfi eld, MA 01983. request permission for other kinds of copying or reprinting, kindly write to the Managing Editor. Editorial Interpreting What We See through the Sciences, Scripture, and PSCF James C. Peterson hong Ho Yu, William Whitney, and their Is the opening of Genesis to be read more like the team open this issue with a survey of the Revelation of John, or the Gospel of John, or yet some C relationship between scientifi c and biblical other genre of its own? literacy. Seeking truth requires listening carefully to the data in both the sciences and in scripture. Each Swamidass, a computational biologist, and the three one requires thoughtful interpretation to understand geneticists who peer reviewed his essay (alongside what is really there. For example, physics and bio- peer review from other relevant disciplines) are all convinced that the genetic evidence is clear that no chemistry are both sciences, yet they offer distinct one couple is the origin of all human DNA. One foci and kinds of description to approach different couple was not, together, the fi rst to have human aspects of one reality. anatomy. The genetic evidence from multiple con- There are different foci and kinds of description in curring angles is that human beings anatomically the Bible as well, to express aspects of one revelation. came from incremental changes over time in a popu- The disciple John writes about the life of Jesus, telling lation. They also agree that most of the people alive what he saw and heard and touched (1 John 1:1–3). 10,000 years ago had children who had children who This is the genre of history. John also reports Jesus had children, until now the earliest ancestors are using metaphors, such as he (Jesus) is the vine, genealogically linked to most of the people who are alive today. and his disciples are the branches (John 15:5). That instruction is about their relationship, not gardening. Each human being today has so many ancestors that When Jesus tells Nicodemus that he must be born we are all genealogical descendants of particular again (John 3), Nicodemus is fl ummoxed that he is people in the past. Among them there might even be too big to re-enter his mother’s womb. Jesus tells some particular couples. Swamidass argues, in his Nicodemus not to take him so literally. He is using article, that God could have called a particular couple what Nicodemus knows about physical birth to tell in that population of anatomical human beings to him something about the spirit, of a new start in life. be ancestors to everybody alive today. Despite the John also writes the book of Revelation that tells of genetic dispersal and dead ends of various lines of what is to come, in apocalyptic visions of a beast heredity, the people of this generation could all be with ten horns and seven heads (13:1) and the ocean genealogically related to such a couple. Descendants turned to blood (16:3). alive today would likely not carry any specifi c genes from that couple, but there could be a genealogi- We see then that one apostle uses different types cal connection of relationships, parent to child to of writing within the library that we call the Bible.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Big History, the Big Bang, and the Big Book: the History of Science

    1 Big History, the Big Bang, and the Big Book: the History of Science

    Big History, the Big Bang, and the Big Book: The History of Science Meets the Tradition of Christianity Course Context In the 1980s, historian David Christian embarked on a delightfully daring journey: to narrate the entire history of the world from its origins to the present. Ignoring the sacred cow of academic specialization, in which academics are only encouraged to speak about their immediate areas of intellectual concentration, Christian coined the term “Big History” to refer to the history of the cosmos in all of its fourteen-billion years of glory. Even though he was an Australian historian of Russia, with little formal training in science, Christian began teaching history in a way that no one had quite done before. As David Christian was attempting to understand the evolution of history across fourteen billion years, many conservative Christians were actively vilifying the consensus of scientists when it came to the age of the universe, the age of earth, and the origins of human life. Kenneth Ham, an Australian like David Christian who is also around the same age, is at the forefront of creationist apologetics. Ham founded the Creation Museum and he is president of a highly influential organization that teaches young-earth creationism and rejects the methodologies and assumptions of mainstream science. Who is right, David Christian or Ken Ham? And what difference does it make anyway? Course Description In Big History, the Big Bang, and the Big Book, we will explore the intersection between the history of mainstream science and the beliefs of evangelical Christianity. As we look at each of the major branches of science, we will do so with an eye toward understanding how it impacts the thought and practice of Protestant evangelicalism.
  • Samuel Cheon Course Theme: CREATION in the BIBLE

    Samuel Cheon Course Theme: CREATION in the BIBLE

    Christianity and History of Science Instructor: Samuel Cheon Course Theme: CREATION IN THE BIBLE, THEOLOGY AND SCIENCE: A HISTORICAL AND INTER- DIALOGICAL PERSPECTIVE Institution: Hannam University,Graduate School of Theological Interdisciplinary Studies, Taejeon, South Korea COURSE DESCRIPTION 1. FORMATION This course is offered in the fall 2002 semester by Dr. Samuel Cheon, Professor of Old Testament at Graduate School of Theological Interdisciplinary Studies, Hannam University, with the assistance of guest lecturers. The course is offered for students in the Th.M. program and entitled as Christianity and History of Science according to the school’s academic plan. The course meets every Thursday in two- hour sessions, for sixteen weeks. Each class consists of presentation, lecture and discussion. Guest lecturers include Dr. Dekryong Kim, Professor of Philosophy; Dr. Jongyong Lee, Professor of Physics, at Hannam University; Dr. Jeongkeun Ahn, Professor of Molecular Biology and Genetics at Chungnam University. Selection of guest lectures is ongoing, and one or two more may be added. 2. GOALS The goals of the course will be for students (1) to articulate definitions for both science and theology, considering their respective tasks and the inherent limits of their methods and objectives; (2) to arrive at a critical historical understanding of the interaction between Christian theology and natural science, especially biblical interpretations and scientific views, minimizing their prejudice of each of the two fields; (3) to develop their historical, hermeneutical and theological horizon of creation, relating to the contemporary natural sciences; (4) to relate their understanding of theology and science to their ministerial context and preaching, especially having a new interpretive perspective of biblical creation stories; (5) to develop some basic skills for interdisciplinary research of science and theology.
  • ABSTRACT Reclaiming Peace: Evangelical Scientists And

    ABSTRACT Reclaiming Peace: Evangelical Scientists And

    ABSTRACT Reclaiming Peace: Evangelical Scientists and Evolution After World War II Christopher M. Rios, Ph.D. Advisor: William L. Pitts, Jr., Ph.D. This dissertation argues that during the same period in which antievolutionism became a movement within American evangelicalism, two key groups of evangelical scientists attempted to initiate a countervailing trend. The American Scientific Affiliation was founded in 1941 at the encouragement of William Houghton, president of Moody Bible Institute. The Research Scientists‘ Christian Fellowship was started in London in 1944 as one of the graduate fellowship groups of Inter-Varsity Fellowship. Both organizations were established out of concern for the apparent threat stemming from contemporary science and with a desire to demonstrate the compatibility of Christian faith and science. Yet the assumptions of the respective founders and the context within which the organizations developed were notably different. At the start, the Americans assumed that reconciliation between the Bible and evolution required the latter to be proven untrue. The British never doubted the validity of evolutionary theory and were convinced from the beginning that conflict stemmed not from the teachings of science or the Bible, but from the perspectives and biases with which one approached the issues. Nevertheless, by the mid 1980s these groups became more similar than they were different. As the ASA gradually accepted evolution and developed convictions similar to those of their British counterpart, the RSCF began to experience antievolutionary resistance with greater force. To set the stage for these developments, this study begins with a short introduction to the issues and brief examination of current historiographical trends.
  • Three Views on Christianity and Science" (Book Review)

    Three Views on Christianity and Science" (Book Review)

    Volume 64 Issue 1 Article 37 7-1-2021 Copan & Reeses' "Three views on Christianity and science" (book review) J. James Mancuso Northeastern Baptist College The Christian Librarian is the official publication of the Association of Christian Librarians (ACL). To learn more about ACL and its products and services please visit //www.acl.org/ Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/tcl Part of the Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons Recommended Citation Mancuso, J. James (2021) "Copan & Reeses' "Three views on Christianity and science" (book review)," The Christian Librarian: Vol. 64 : Iss. 1 , Article 37. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/tcl/vol64/iss1/37 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Christian Librarian by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Reviews Book Reviews Copan, P., Reese, C. L. (Ed.). (2021). Three views on Christianity and science. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. 214 pp. $18.99. ISBN 9780310598541. This book is well-suited for collections that seek to document the debate between faith and reason, between Christianity and science, between faith-based communities and the prevailing mindset that marginalizes them in mainstream media and publishing. This book is a collection of nine essays, and three rejoinders, written by three prominent writers in this realm of discussion: Michael Ruse, Alister McGrath, and Bruce L. Gordon. Michael Ruse brings the view of an atheist who asserts that science and religion operate in separate realms, each answering a different set of questions, and that they are incapable of valid input in the realm of the other.
  • Crisis of Evangelical Christianity: Roots, Consequences, and Resolutions (Book Review)

    Crisis of Evangelical Christianity: Roots, Consequences, and Resolutions (Book Review)

    Volume 45 Number 3 Article 6 March 2017 Crisis of Evangelical Christianity: Roots, Consequences, and Resolutions (Book Review) Scott Culpepper Dordt College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.dordt.edu/pro_rege Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Higher Education Commons Recommended Citation Culpepper, Scott (2017) "Crisis of Evangelical Christianity: Roots, Consequences, and Resolutions (Book Review)," Pro Rege: Vol. 45: No. 3, 31 - 33. Available at: https://digitalcollections.dordt.edu/pro_rege/vol45/iss3/6 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the University Publications at Digital Collections @ Dordt. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pro Rege by an authorized administrator of Digital Collections @ Dordt. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOOK REVIEWS The Crisis of Evangelical Christianity: Roots, Consequences, and Resolutions. Sewell, Keith C. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2016. 292pp. ISBN: 978-1498238755. Reviewed by K. Scott Culpepper, Associate Professor of History, Dordt College. The quest to define the elusive concept of “evan- Kuyperian lens. Secondly, Sewell looks at the evan- gelicalism” has claimed a flood of ink and reams gelical tradition in its larger international context, as upon reams of paper, not to mention all the digital shaped by his varied experiences in Europe, North incarnations of those debates. The election of 2016 America, and Australasia. This broader perspective smashed into all previous understandings of “evan- yields a more comprehensive canvas for comparison gelicals” and “evangelicalism” with all the gentle and contrast than most works on evangelicalism. force of a hydrogen bomb.
  • Religious Studies (RELIG) 1

    Religious Studies (RELIG) 1

    Religious Studies (RELIG) 1 RELIG 321: Old Testament RELIGIOUS STUDIES (RELIG) (3-0) Cr. 3. F. Courses primarily for undergraduates: An in-depth study of the literature and religion of ancient Israel in light of recent archaeological discoveries, research about the ancient Near East, RELIG 205: Introduction to World Religions and a variety of interpretations. (3-0) Cr. 3. F.S.SS. An introduction to the academic study of religions, including myths, RELIG 322: New Testament beliefs, rituals, values, social forms. Examples chosen from oral cultures (3-0) Cr. 3. S. and major religions of the world. A detailed survey of the sacred scriptures of Christianity in light of recent Meets International Perspectives Requirement. archaeological discoveries and historical research about their Greco- Roman and Jewish background. RELIG 210: Religion in America (3-0) Cr. 3. F.S.SS. RELIG 324: Christianity and Science Introductory study of the major beliefs, practices, and institutions of (3-0) Cr. 3. S. American Judaism, Catholicism, Protestantism, and Islam with emphasis Prereq: BIOL 101, or another science course taught at ISU on the diversity of religion in America, and attention to issues of gender, Examines major challenges to Christianity's understandings of creation race, and class. posed by the sciences; attention given to the relations of Christianity and Meets U.S. Diversity Requirement science, and to Christianity’s responses to ecological issues. RELIG 220: Introduction to the Bible RELIG 333: Introduction to Judaism (3-0) Cr. 3. F.S. (3-0) Cr. 3. Basic overview of the contents of the Old and New Testament in light of An introduction to basic Judaism.
  • Searching for Common Ground Between Science and Faith

    Searching for Common Ground Between Science and Faith

    Searching for Common Ground Between Science and Faith By Russ Colson, Feb 11, 2020--Room of Nations, Memorial Union-- Science, Religion, and Lunch Seminars (SRLS) hosted by the Northern Plains Ethics Institute Science and Religion: DO NOT ENTER! I have certainly felt that way sometimes –not felt fully welcomed as a scientist in a community of faith—not felt fully comfortable as a person of faith among scientists.) In the more distant past, faith and science mostly allies, with the orderliness of the natural world reflecting the orderliness and rationality of a greater being. God was seen to either inhabit that orderly universe, thus giving it orderliness, or to provide the laws by which that orderly universe operated. But certain dissonances began to emerge, notably with the conflict between Galileo and the Catholic Church, and with the findings of evolution, and age of the earth in the late 1800s and early 1900s and particularly between Christianity and science. Kind of re-energizing in 1960s Dissonance has developed to the point that many people of faith doubt that a person of science can be a true Christian, and many people of science see faith as an obstacle to reason. Seemingly, One cannot enter both worlds. People looking for pathways to unity have taken different roads. For example, one approach is to simply hold them as different ways of knowing and not worry about the seeming dissonance. You have your truth, I have mine, let's all be friends. Agree with the “let's all be friends” part—but the idea that truth is only personal, with no higher Truth with a capital T, is not quite compatible with science, or with most traditional views of faith.
  • Religious Communities, Science, Scientists, and Perceptions: a Comprehensive Survey

    Religious Communities, Science, Scientists, and Perceptions: a Comprehensive Survey

    Religious Communities, Science, Scientists, and Perceptions: A Comprehensive Survey EMBARGOED UNTIL 2/16/14 A paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science February 16, 2014 Elaine Howard Ecklund Rice University RUS Study PI Christopher Scheitle Saint John’s University RUS Senior Research Associate Data presented in this report is part of the Religious Understandings of Science Study (2012-2015) funded by the John Templeton Foundation (grant 38817), Elaine Howard Ecklund, Rice University, PI. The study has received additional support from Rice University’s Shell Center for Sustainability, The Religion and Public Life Program at Rice University, and the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion. Rice University in collaborating with the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Dialogue on Science, Ethics, and Religion program, Jennifer Wiseman, PI and Director, which will utilize the research findings to facilitate eXtensive programming among the scientific and religious communities. Direct All Correspondence to Elaine Howard Ecklund Autrey Professor of Sociology Study PI Rice University [email protected] Introduction From Galileo to the Scopes Monkey Trial, science and religion have been pitted as opponents (Numbers 1992). Media attention generally focuses on the conflict that religious and scientific communities have over evolution (Bartlett 2005; Begley 1998; Behe 2005; Cuomo 2005), and controversial court cases over how to teach evolution in public schools have renewed public interest (Berkman and Pultzer 2010). The debate between science and religion, however, goes beyond evolution. Some scientists condemn religious leaders more generally for the perception that they facilitate scientific ignorance among the American public (Dawkins 2006; Editors 2005; Lakoff 2005; Scott 2000).
  • The Bible, Protestantism and the Rise of Natural Science: a Response to Harrison’S Thesis

    The Bible, Protestantism and the Rise of Natural Science: a Response to Harrison’S Thesis

    S & CB (2009), 21, 133–153 0954–4194 JITSE M. VAN DER MEER AND RICHARD OOSTERHOFF The Bible, Protestantism and the Rise of Natural Science: A Response to Harrison’s Thesis Harrison has proposed that the rise of modern science required as its most important condition the decline of religious nature symbolism (allegory) across early modern Western culture because it diverted attention away from nature to God. He identifies the main cause of this decline as the rejection of religious nature symbolism by the Protestant reformers. They rejected symbolic interpretation of Scripture texts because it made the meaning of the text indeterminate. We offer six reasons for doubting the proposed role of the Protestant Reformation and suggest other possible causes for the rise of modern science. There is another reading of Harrison’s thesis. For Harrison the rejection of symbolism in Scripture interpretation removes a veil from nature and its particular order the exploration of which still requires other causes. According to what we call the analogy thesis the rejection of religious nature symbolism removed a source of ambiguity and led to the use of precision in the language of biblical scholarship. By analogy of the two books this actively encouraged precise unequivocal language and attention to empirical detail in the study of nature. We argue that disagreements over Scripture interpretation render this thesis implausible as well. Keywords: nature, allegory, symbolism, Middle Ages, interpretation of Scripture, natural science, ambiguity, Protestant Reformation, natural philosophy, Jesuit science Introduction In his book The Bible, Protestantism and the Rise of Natural Science Harrison has proposed that during the Middle Ages and the Early Modern Period sym- bolic, that is, allegorical approaches to nature1 diverted attention from nature 1 Harrison refers to the rejection of nature symbolism as the rejection of allegory.
  • Arise from the Encounter Between Biblical Traditions and the Challenges of Contemporary and Future Ecological Issues

    Arise from the Encounter Between Biblical Traditions and the Challenges of Contemporary and Future Ecological Issues

    arise from the encounter between biblical traditions and the challenges of contemporary and future ecological issues. --------. Ecological Hermeneutics: Biblical, Historical, and Theological Perspectives. London & New York: T&T Clark, 2010. There are two central concerns of the collection of essays that comprise Ecological Hermeneutics: first, to bring biblical and theological perspectives into closer dialogue through ecologically oriented and hermeneutically informed reflection on the Bible; second, to learn critically from the history of interpretation, recognizing that earlier interpreters did not share contemporary ecological concerns and awareness. Ecological Hermeneutics, therefore, attempts to generate hermeneutically aware and critical readings of biblical texts, all of which aim to make constructive contributions to ecotheology. Additionally, the text also attempts to indicate how valuable studies of the history of interpretation can be for ecotheology, as well as illustrate the potential for an ecological hermeneutics to bring a diverse range of scholars together in making constructive attempts to address issues of profound importance. --------. “The Green Bible: A Timely Idea Deeply Flawed.” Expository Times (2010): 180-185. ABSTRACT: This article offers a critical review of the recently published Green Bible (HarperCollins, 2008), a “green-letter edition” intended to enable readers to discover the Bible’s message concerning humanity’s duty to care for creation. Despite the often valuable and stimulating essays and study materials that surround the ‘green-letter edition’ of the biblical text, the idea at the heart of the project is deeply flawed. It fails to do justice to the fact that the biblical material is, as on other ethical issues, profoundly ambivalent, requiring careful and constructive interpretation which is, in turn, open to debate and contestation.
  • 'Battle' Between Science and Religion Over Evolution in Nineteenth Century

    'Battle' Between Science and Religion Over Evolution in Nineteenth Century

    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. THE 'BATTLE' BETWEEN SCIENCE AND RELIGION OVER EVOLUTION IN NINETEENTH CENTURY NEW ZEALAND A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History at Massey University JOHN STENHOUSE 1985 MASSEY UNIVERSITY l..t (a) g�'<re perm1ss1on for my thesis, entitled to be made available to readers in the Library undertheconditions d€termined by theLihrariai:l.. (b) I agree to my thesis, if asked for anotherby institut.i.o� :;n"ay on temporary loan under conditions determinedby the Librarian. (c) I also agree that my thesismay he copied wrLibraryUS€. 2. * I do not wish my thesis, entitled .�.tr�. �JMtk/.. ....�h . ..$.� .. .M!!: . &tffl.ih. .()l.lrt: . ...� �� ... Ji. ...N� . ... �. ..N.¥. .. �/...... to be made available to readers or to be sent to other institutions without my written consent within the next two years. Signed .. ...@..� ..................... Date .. .%..�� ...�9.� ............... * Strike out the sentence or phrase which does not apply. The Library Massey University Palmerston North, N.Z. The copyright of this thesis belongs to the author. Readers must sign their name m the space below to show that they recognise this. They are asked to add their permanent address. Name and Address Dat e MASSEY UNIVEftSfTY Abstract This thesis describes and anal yses the New Zealand response to the Darwinian theory of evolution in the second half of the nineteenth century.
  • Christianity and Science: Disputes Among the Faithful Jeff Hardin

    Christianity and Science: Disputes Among the Faithful Jeff Hardin

    Christianity and Science: DisputesV Among the Faithful Dialogues Jeff Hardin Dept. of Zoology Univ. of Wisconsin [email protected] Part 1: Why This Matters Why This Matters Issues of science and religion are important to our civilization - far too significant to be left to either the devoutly religious physicist or the scoffing atheistical biologist. People holding different beliefs and forms of expertise need to work together in an open, non- confrontational environment accepting both science and religion as valid aspects of human experience. It is a challenge facing the coming millennium. Nature 403: 831 (2000) Why This Matters Time Oct. 29, 2014 The Personal Importance • Professor and Chair of a Zoology Department at a major research university • A Christian with a M.Div. degree from an evangelical seminary before pursuing a Ph.D. at U.C.-Berkeley •Not an evolutionary biologist (I study embryos) •Faculty advisor for Christian student groups Elaine Howard Ecklund (Rice Univ.) http://wikipedia.org Skim or 4%? http://biologos.org/infographics The Personal Toll of the Issue Jeremy O’Connell, 2006 Lack of congruence Alyssa Bryant Rockenbach [“Spirituality in Higher Education: A National Study of College Students’ Search for Meaning a Purpose.”] ‘To get the “A,” you’ve got to repeat what the teacher tells you, regurgitate it, get your “A,” and get out—even though you might not believe in it. I mean, to me, the irony of it all is that I have to play the part of somebody that is not true to himself.’ A Portrait of Evangelical Christian Students