DOCSLIB.ORG

Curriculum of Llb (5 Years)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Curriculum of Llb (5 Years) CURRICULUM OF LLB (5 YEARS) (Revised 20150) HIG HER EDUC ATION COMMISSION HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION ISLAMABAD 1 CURRICULUM DIVISION, HEC Prof. Dr. Mukhtar Ahmed Chairman Mr. Fida Hussain Director General (Acad) Ms. Ghayur Fatima Director (Curriculum) Mr. Rizwan Shoukat Deputy Director (Curr) Mr. Abid Wahab Assistant Director (Curr) Mr. Riaz-ul-Haque Assistant Director (Curr) 2 3 Contents NATIONAL CURRICULUM REVISION COMMITTEE ........... 6 PROCEEDINGS ........................................................................... 9 STANDARDIZED FORMAT FOR LLB (5-YEAR) DEGREE PROGRAMME ............................................................................ 13 STANDARDIZED TEMPLATE / SCHEME OF STUDIES FOR FIVE-YEAR LLB DEGREE PROGRAMME .................. 16 SCHEME OF STUDIES FOR LLB (5-YEAR) PROGRAM .. 21 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................. 64 4 PREFACE The curriculum, with varying definitions, is a plan of the teaching-learning process that students of an academic programme are required to undergo. It includes objectives and learning outcomes, course contents, scheme of studies, teaching methodologies and methods of assessment of learning. Knowledge in all academic disciplines is expanding and even new disciplines are also emerging, it is imperative that curriculum are developed and revised regularly. University Grants Commission (UGC) was designated as the competent authority to develop, review and revise curricula beyond Class-XII vide Section 3, Sub-Section 2 (ii), Act of Parliament No. X of 1976 titled “Supervision of Curricula and Textbooks and Maintenance of Standard of Education”. With the repeal of UGC Act, the same function was assigned to the Higher Education Commission (HEC) under its Ordinance of 2002, Section 10, Sub-Section 1 (v). In compliance with the provisions, the Curriculum Division of HEC undertakes the revision of curricula after every three years through respective National Curriculum Revision Committees (NCRCs) which consist of eminent professors and researchers of relevant fields from public and private sector universities, R&D organizations, councils, industry and civil society nominated by their organizations. In order to impart education at par with quality international standards, HEC NCRCs have developed unified templates as guidelines for the development and revision of curricula in the disciplines of Basic Sciences, Applied Sciences, Social Sciences, Agriculture and Engineering in 2007 and 2009. It is hoped that this curriculum document, prepared by the respective NCRC’s, would serve the purpose of meeting our national, social and economic needs, and it would also provide the level of competency specified in Pakistan Qualification Framework to make it compatible with international educational standards. The curriculum is also placed on the website of HEC (www.hec.gov.pk). (Fida Hussain) Director General (Academics) 5 CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STAGE-I STAGE-II STAGE-III STAGE-IV CURRI. UNDER CURRI. IN DRAFT FOLLOW UP FINAL STAGE CONSIDERATION STAGE STUDY ST COLLECTION OF APPRAISAL OF 1 DRAFT BY EXP. OF PREP. OF FINAL QUESTIONNAIRE REC COL./UNIV CURRI. CONS. OF CRC. FINALIZATION OF INCORPORATION OF COMMENTS DRAFT BY CRC REC. OF V.C.C. PREP. OF DRAFT APPROVAL OF PRINTING OF REVIEW BY CRC CURRI. BY V.C.C. CURRI. Abbreviations Used: IMPLE. OF CURRI. BACK TO STAGE-I CRC. Curriculum Revision Committee VCC. Vice Chancellor’s Committee EXP. Experts COL. Colleges UNI. Universities ORIENTATION PREP. Preparation COURSES REC. Recommendations 6 NATIONAL CURRICULUM REVISION COMMITTEE MEETINGS IN LAW JANUARY 20-22, 2015 (HEC-KARACHI) AND MAY 5-7- 2015 AT BZU MULTAN S # Name and Address Email 1 Professor Ahmed Ali [email protected] Convener Khan Head Department of Law Bahria University, Islamabad 2. Mr. Arshad Nawaz [email protected] Secretary Khan Assistant Professor , Department of Law Incharge School of Law, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad. 3. Prof. Dr. Justice (Rtd) [email protected] Member Qazi Khalid Vice Chancellor, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto University of Law, Karachi. 4. Justice (Rtd) Dr. ghousjustice786@yahoo. Member Ghous Muhammad com Professor / Director, School of Law, University of Karachi, Karachi. 5. Mr. Abrar Hasan [email protected] Member/ Member Pakistan Bar om Rep. Council Pakistan Advocate Supreme Bar Council Court-Karachi. 7 6. Mian Aabbas Ahmed mianhassanabbas1@gmail. Member/ Member, Pakistan com Rep. Bar Council, Pakistan Islamabad. Bar Council 7. Prof. Dr. Fayyaz-ur- fayyazurrehman57@ Member Rehman, hotmail.com Principal, University Law College. University of Peshawar, Peshawar. 8. Prof. Dr. Shams-ul- [email protected] Member Basar Law College University of Sargodha, Main Campus, Sargodha . 9. Dr. Abdul Qadoos [email protected] Member Sial, Head Department of Law Islamia University of Bahawalpur. 10 Mr. Muhammad [email protected] Member Saleem Sheikh. Department of Law, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Gillani Law College, Multan 11 Prof. Ahmed Ali [email protected] Member Sheikh m Principal, Sindh Law College, Hyderabad . 12 Mr. Alam Zeb Khan [email protected] Member Head, Department of Law, Hazara University,Mansehra. 8 13 Dr. M.A. Iqbal [email protected] Member Chairman, Department of Law, International Islamic University, Islamabad. 14. Dr. Muhammad [email protected] Member Ramzan Wattoo, Assistant Professor, Law College, Lahore Leads University, 5 Tipu Block, New Garden Town, Lahore. 15 Mr. Faisal Shahzad, [email protected] Member Lecturer/Coordinator. Department of Shariah & Law, Islamic College/ University Peshawar, 16 Mr. Nasir Majeed [email protected] Member Head of Department k of Law University of Gujrat, Hafiz Hayat Campus, Gujrat. 17 Mr. M. Danyal Khan [email protected] Member Gillani Law College BZU, Multan PROCEEDINGS A preliminary meeting of the National Curriculum Review Committee in Law was held on January 20-22, 2015 at the Higher Education Commission- Regional Centre at Karachi. The purpose of the meeting was to review/ revise the curriculum of LLB 5-year composite degree at the undergraduate level. The list of participants is attached. Mr. Salman Ahmad, Director HEC Regional Centre, Karachi, in his opening remarks explained the functioning of the Curriculum Wing of the HEC. He informed the participants about the HEC’s mandate to review the curriculum of all disciplines after every three years. He said that it is 9 an ongoing process and revisions of various disciplines take place at regular intervals. Explaining the objectives of the meeting, the Director said that the committee is required to: Prepare a draft curriculum in the discipline of Law and to bring it at par with international standards, Incorporate latest reading and writing material for each proposed course, Bring uniformity and develop minimum baseline courses in each and every course of studies; and To make recommendations for the promotion and further development of the disciple. Explaining the procedure of the National Curriculum Review Committee, the Director asked the members to select a Convener and a Secretary of the Committee. He said after the selection of the convener and secretary, the committee is required to follow the agenda as circulated. Accordingly Prof. Ahmed Ali Sheikh, Principal Hyderabad law College proposed the names of Professor Ahmad Ali Khan, Head of Law Department of Bahria University, Islamabad and Mr. Arshad Nawaz Khan, Incharge School of Law of Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad as Convener and Secretary respectively. All participants endorsed the proposition. Thereafter the Technical Session of the committee started. Professor Ahmad Ali Khan thanked all members for the confidence they reposed in him as convener. He explained the background of the 5-year LLB degree programme and stated that developing a 5-year law degree programme was a great achievement in the history of legal education in Pakistan. He proposed to make the curriculum a living one so that it could be modified and improved upon according to the needs of time. He observed that the focus of the proposed curriculum is on research and learning outside the classroom which would be helpful in creating a critical mass of law graduates fully committed to understanding and using law as a tool of social reform and social change. He appreciated the role of the Pakistan Bar Council for its continuous and strenuous efforts in addressing the issues relating to the promotion and furtherance of legal education in Pakistan. The Committee exhaustively considered and evaluated the existing LLB 5-year degree courses. It expressed its overall satisfaction and concurrence over the existing curriculum of the degree; however, the Committee noted various practical difficulties in the implementation of current 5-year degree programme and proposed suitable changes in the 10 existing scheme of studies. The proposed changes were circulated to all universities and institutions for their comments and observations. The Final meeting of the NCRC in Law was held from May 5-7, 2015 in Baha-Ud-Din Zakariya University, Multan. The participants thanked Prof. Dr. Khawaja Syed Alqama, Vice Chancellor BZ University, Multan for hosting and excellent arrangements for organizing the meeting. It was felt that holding such kind of meetings on campuses of universities is a very good idea as it helps in the ownership of decisions by the universities. In addition to that, it helps in developing networking of the academia. The meeting was also attended
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JUDGEMENT SHEET Vs
    Form No: HCJD/C-121. JUDGEMENT SHEET IN THE ISLAMABAD HIGH COURT, ISLAMABAD JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT W.P. No. 2906 of 2018 Ms Shahnaz Butt Vs Islamabad Bar Association through its President, etc. Petitioner by : Petitioner, in person. Respondents by : 20.06.2019: Raja Inaam Amin Minhas, President IHCBA. Raja Tahir Mehmood, Vice President IDBA. Raja Yasir Shakeel Jnajua, General Secretary IDBA. Syed Muhammad Tayyab, Deputy Attorney General. Mr Amir Latif Gill Advocate, for CDA. 02.10.2019: Raja Inaam Amin Minhas, President IHCBA. Mr Muhammad Umair Baloch, Secretary IHCBA. Mr Muhammad Asif Gujjar, Library Secretary IHCBA. Raja Yasir Shakeel Jnajua, General Secretary IDBA. Mr Amir Latif Gill Advocate, for CDA. 02.03.2020: Mr Muhammad Zafar Khokhar, President IBA. Mr Sohail Akbar Chaudhary, General Secretary IHCBA. Mr Nazeer Ahmed Tabassum, Executive Member IBA. Mr Amir Latif Gill Advocate, for CDA. Ch. Muhammad Tahir Mehmood, AAG. 15.02.2021: Syed Muhammad Tayyab, DAG. Rana Waqas Anwar, Addl. Deputy Commissioner. Mr Naveed, Member Estate CDA. Mr Ayaz, Member Engineering CDA. Mr Ali Asghar, Director Development CDA. W.P. No. 2906 of 2018. 2 Dates of Hearing : 20.06.2019, 02.10.2019, 02.03.2020 & 15.02.2021. ATHAR MINALLAH, CJ.- The Islamic Republic of Pakistan became a reality as an independent sovereign State after a long drawn struggle, heroically led by the dynamic leader, Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah. The founder was a lawyer by profession. He was enrolled as an Advocate of the Bombay High Court on 24th of August 1896 and in a short time he was acknowledged as an artist of the legal profession.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Judicial Independence in Pakistan
    BUILDING JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN PAKISTAN 10 November 2004 Asia Report N°86 Islamabad/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. THE STRUCTURE AND HISTORY OF PAKISTAN'S JUDICIARY.................... 2 A. THE STRUCTURE OF PAKISTAN'S JUDICIARY ............................................................................2 B. COURTS AND POLITICS: PRE-1999 ENTANGLEMENTS.........................................................3 C. THE SUPREME COURT AND THE 12 OCTOBER 1999 COUP ..................................................5 III. JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS AND PROMOTIONS ............................................... 6 A. THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK.....................................................................................6 B. APPOINTMENTS AND PROMOTIONS IN PRACTICE..................................................................8 C. REFORMING THE APPOINTMENT AND PROMOTION OF JUDGES ...........................................11 IV. THE REMOVAL OF JUDGES................................................................................... 12 A. MEANS OF REMOVING JUDGES............................................................................................12 B. REFORMING REMOVALS AND STEMMING CORRUPTION.......................................................13 C. "ADDITIONAL" HIGH COURT JUDGES ..................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit At
    Order Sheet IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD CP No. D- 807 of 2020 BEFORE : Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Date of hearing & decision: 25.08.2020 Petitioner : Jagdesh R. Mullani, in person Respondent No.1 : through Mr. Ghulam Shabbir Shar, Advocate Respondent No.2 : Nemo. Respondent No.3: through Mr. Allah Bachayo Soomro, Addl.A.G. Respondent No.4 : Mr. Farhad Ali Abro, in person & Mr. Ayaz Hussain Tunio, Advocate On Court notice : Mr. Muhammad Humayoon Khan, D.A.G. O R D E R ADNAN-UL-KARIM MEMON, J: - Principally, through instant Petition, the Petitioner has asked for issuance of Writ against Respondent No.4 to vacate the office of Acting President Sindh High Court Bar Association, Hyderabad (SHBAH) and seeking declaration to the effect that the orders dated 01st June 2020 and 08th June, 2020 respectively passed by Sindh Bar Council and Chairman Appeal Committee Pakistan Bar Council (Sindh) are illegal, void ab initio and contrary to the Legal Practitioners Bar Council Act, 1973, and Pakistan Bar Council Rules 1986. He also seeks direction to Sindh Bar Council to issue Notification in his favour as President Sindh High Court Bar Association, Hyderabad after elevation of earlier President as Member Election Commission of Pakistan on the ground that he being contesting candidate, having secured highest number of votes next after the member, is entitled to be appointed as President Sindh High Court Bar Association, Hyderabad. Petitioner in support of his version has heavily relied upon paragraph 15 of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of Sindh High Court Bar Association Hyderabad, coupled with Rule 21 of the Bar Association (Recognition) Rules, 2017 (Model Bye-Laws) framed by Sindh Bar Council.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of Pakistan
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN The Chief Justice and his Companion Judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, Islamabad. The petition of Mr./Mrs. ______________________ an Advocate enrolled in the High Court of ________________ for enrollment as an Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan. ....................................................... Petitioner. SHEWETH: 1. That your petitioner was enrolled as an Advocate of______________ High Court on _____________, and that he is still a practicing Advocate of the said High Court. A complete bio-data containing all relevant information is attached herewith. (If there was a break of more than a year in continuity of active practice, please give particulars and reasons). 2. That your petitioner has conducted in the High Court _____________ cases independently and _________________ cases as a junior lawyer. And that _____________ cases are now pending in the High Court of both categories. Respective lists are attached. 3. That it has been certified by the Chief Justice and Judges of the High Court that your petitioner is a fit and proper person to appear and plead as an Advocate before the Supreme Court. 4. That your petitioner has been issued a certificate by the Pakistan Bar Council to appear and plead as an Advocate before the Supreme Court. (if the application is being submitted more than six months after the grant of certificate by the Pakistan Bar Council please give reason). 5. That your petitioner satisfies all the conditions laid down by this Court is respect of the persons entitled to appear
    [Show full text]
  • Pro Bono Practices and Opportunities in Pakistan1 I. Introduction the Pro
    Pro Bono Practices and Opportunities in Pakistan 1 I. Introduction The pro bono environment in Pakistan is nascent, but is growing gradually. At present, Pakistan has a two-pronged structure for legal aid i.e. under the Pakistan Bar Council Free Legal Aid Rules, 1999 and District Legal Empowerment Committee (Constitution & Function) Rules, 2011. While the regulatory framework is present, there remains a strong need for further action amongst the legal community - there is a serious underutilization of funds allocated to institutions and committees responsible for providing legal aid, which in turn demonstrates a lack of will and resolve. The gap left by lack of implementation of the legal aid framework at a government level is to some extent filled by local and international non- governmental organizations, as well as a handful of domestic law firms, which offer legal services to the country’s underserved populations and are engaged in direct representation and broader reform work. II. Overview of Pro Bono Practices (a) Professional Regulation 1. Describe the laws/rules that regulate the provision of The practice of law in Pakistan is primarily legal services? governed by the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act of 1973, last amended on 01 June 2018 (the " Bar Councils Act "). 2 The Bar Councils Act established the Pakistan Bar Council, as well as the four provincial bar councils, namely the Punjab Bar Council, the Sindh Bar Council, the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Bar Council and the Baluchistan Bar Council (together, the " Provincial Bar Councils ") 3 and a bar council for the Islamabad Capital Territory, namely the Islamabad Bar Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Order URC
    Law and Order URC NEWSCLIPPINGS JANUARY TO JUNE 2019 LAW & ORDERS Urban Resource Centre A-2, 2nd floor, Westland Trade Centre, Block 7&8, C-5, Shaheed-e-Millat Road, Karachi. Tel: 021-4559317, Fax: 021-4387692, Email: [email protected], Website: www.urckarachi.org Facebook: www.facebook.com/URCKHI Twitter: https://twitter.com/urc_karachi 1 Law and Order URC Targeted killing: KMC employee shot dead in Hussainabad Unidentified assailants shot and killed an employee of the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC) at Hussainabad locality of Federal B Area in Central district on Monday. The deceased was struck by seven bullets in different parts of the body. Nine bullet shells of a 9mm pistol were recovered from the scene of the crime. According to police, the deceased was called to the location through a phone call. They said the late KMC employee was on his motorcycle waiting for someone. Two unidentified men killed him by opening fire at him at Hussainabad, near Okhai Memon Masjid, in the limits of Azizabad police station. The deceased, identified as Shakeel Ahmed, aged 35, son of Shafiq Ahmed, was shifted to Abbasi Shaheed Hospital for medico-legal formalities. He was a resident of house no. L-72 Sector 5C 4, North Karachi, and worked as a clerk in KMC‘s engineering department. Rangers and police officials reached the scene after receiving information of the incident. They recovered nine bullet shells of a 9mm pistol and have begun investigating the incident. According to Azizabad DSP Shaukat Raza, someone had phoned and summoned the deceased to Hussainabad, near Okhai Memon Masjid.
    [Show full text]
  • Amended Upto 2020)
    ISLAMABAD BAR COUNCIL NOTIFICATION Islamabad, the 25th November, 2020 S.R.O. __________— In exercise of the powers conferred by section 56 of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973 (Act XXXV of 1973) and other enabling provisions in this behalf, the Islamabad Bar Council hereby makes and notifies the following rules: THE ISLAMABAD LEGAL PRACTITIONERS AND BAR COUNCIL RULES, 2017 (Amended upto 2020) (Passed by Islamabad Bar Council in its meeting held on 25th November, 2020) CHAPTER – 1 PRELIMINARY 1.1 These Rules shall be called the Islamabad Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Rules, 2017. 1.2 . They shall come into force at once. 1.3 . In these Rules unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context :- a) “Act” means the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973; b) “Advocate” means an advocate as defined in Sec. 2(a) of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973; c) “Advocate-General” means the Advocate-General for Islamabad Capital Territory; d) “Bar Association” means the Islamabad District Bar Association and the Islamabad High Court Bar Association recognized as such by the Bar Council; e) “Bar Council” means the Islamabad Council; f) “Chairman” means the Chairman of the Islamabad Bar Council; g) “Committee” means a Committee constituted by the Bar Council; h) “Firm” means a firm of lawyers as described in Chapter IX of these Rules; i) “Form” means form appended to these Rules; j) “ICT” means The Islamabad Capital Territory; k) “Member” means a member of the Islamabad Bar Council elected as such under Section 5, or who fills the vacancy of an elected member under Section 16(b) of the said Act; l) “Misconduct” means violation of any provision of the Act, Pakistan Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Rules 1976, Islamabad Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Rules 2017, Islamabad Bar Council Regulations 2017; and also includes non observance of any direction/ instruction of the Bar Council.
    [Show full text]
  • The 18Th Amendment in the 1973 Constitution Fakhr-Ul-Islam by the Chief Justice in the Above Mentioned Cases, the Patience of Military Dictator Came to Its Brim
    The 18 th Amendment in the 1973 Constitution Fakhr-ul-Islam ∗ Abstract Comparing with the 37 year checkered constitutional history (1973- 2010), the first decade of 21 st Century, brought some hope for Pakistan. That was adoption of 18th Constitutional Amendment. It was a damage-control exercise which was proposed by an All Party Parliamentary Committee (APPC). To what extent, the 18th Constitutional Amendment restored the original constitution and what are its salient features, is the subject of this paper. Defects found in the 18th Amendment created a head on collision between Parliament and judiciary. However, these were subsequently rectified through the 19 th Amendment passed after few months of the previous bill. Keywords: Constitution, Amendment, Parliamentary, Pakistan An Eventful Year: A Prelude to Unanimous Amendment The year 2007 proved to be decisive in shaping up political and constitutional contours in Pakistan. Musharraf’s clash with judiciary, assassination of Benazir Bhutto and atmosphere of political conciliation in the parliament after 2008 election, paved the way for unanimity on 18 th Constitutional Amendment. Like other dictators, General Pervez Musharraf was scared of judiciary. He wanted to tame it so that he could smoothly implement his agenda. Apart from removing judges of superior courts on the pretext of not taking oath under his Provisional Constitutional Order (PCO), he changed eight chief justices during 1999-2007. 1 Nevertheless Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, a hard nut, refused to give in. Justice Iftikhar had taken many sensitive cases for hearing in the Supreme Court. They included Missing Persons Case, Privatization of Karachi Steel Mills case and Construction of Golf Course at a children Park in Islamabad.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD FINAL CAUSE LIST 13 of 2018 from 26-Mar to 30-Mar-2018 for Fixation and Result of Cases, Please Visit
    SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD FINAL CAUSE LIST 13 of 2018 From 26-Mar to 30-Mar-2018 For fixation and result of cases, please visit www.supremecourt.gov.pk The following cases are fixed for hearing before the Court at Islamabad during the week commencing 26-Mar-2018 at 09:00 AM or soon thereafter as may be convenient to the Court. (i) No application for adjournment through fax/email will be placed before the Court. If any counsel is unable to appear for any reason, the Advocate-on-Record will be required to argue the case. (ii) No adjournment on any ground will be granted. BENCH - I MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN Monday, 26-Mar-2018 1 C.A.1178/2008 Haji Baz Muhammad and another v. Noor Mr. Abdus Salim Ansari, AOR (Qta) (Specific Performance) Ali and another (Enrl#229) (D.B.) Mr. Kamran Murtaza, ASC (Qta) (Enrl#2333) Mr. Rizwan Ejaz, ASC (Enrl#4107) (Qta) R Ex-Parte Mr. Ahmed Nawaz Chaudhry, AOR (Enrl#243) Mr. Zulfikar Khalid Maluka, ASC (Ibd) (Enrl#2752) 2 C.A.182-P/2013 Muhammad Fateh Khan & others v. Land Mr. Tasleem Hussain, AOR (Pesh) (Land Acquisition) Acquisition Collector Swabi Scarp, (Enrl#187) (S.J.) WAPDA Mardan & others Muhammad Asif Khan, ASC Mir Adam Khan, AOR (Enrl#185) (Pesh) Mr. Mahmudul Islam, AOR (Lhr) (Enrl#177) Mr. Aurangzeb Mirza, ASC (Lhr) (Enrl#2706) and(2) C.A.194-P/2013 Nawabzada Mohammad Usman Khan v. Mr. Muhammad Ajmal Khan, AOR (Pesh) (Land Acquisition) Land Acquisition Collector Swabi Scarp, (Enrl#225) (S.J.) Mardan & others Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan: Country Report the Situa�On in Pakistan
    Asylum Research Centre Pakistan: Country Report /shutterstock.com The situa�on in Pakistan Lukasz Stefanski June 2015 (COI up to 20 February 2015) Cover photo © 20 February 2015 (published June 2015) Pakistan Country Report Explanatory Note Sources and databases consulted List of Acronyms CONTENTS 1. Background Information 1.1. Status of tribal areas 1.1.1. Map of Pakistan 1.1.2. Status in law of the FATA and governance arrangements under the Pakistani Constitution 1.1.3. Status in law of the PATA and governance arrangements under the Pakistani Constitution 1.2. General overview of ethnic and linguistic groups 1.3. Overview of the present government structures 1.3.1. Government structures and political system 1.3.2. Overview of main political parties 1.3.3. The judicial system, including the use of tribal justice mechanisms and the application of Islamic law 1.3.4. Characteristics of the government and state institutions 1.3.4.1. Corruption 1.3.4.2. Professionalism of civil service 1.3.5. Role of the military in governance 1.4. Overview of current socio-economic issues 1.4.1. Rising food prices and food security 1.4.2. Petrol crisis and electricity shortages 1.4.3. Unemployment 2. Main Political Developments (since June 2013) 2.1. Current political landscape 2.2. Overview of major political developments since June 2013, including: 2.2.1. May 2013: General elections 2.2.2. August-December 2014: Opposition protests organised by Pakistan Tekreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) 2.2.3. Former Prime Minister Raja Pervaiz Ashraf 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction)
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) PRESENT: MR. JUSTICE MIAN SAQIB NISAR, HCJ MR. JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL MR. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN CONSTITUTION PETITION NO.134 OF 2012 AND CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION NO.1864 OF 2010 IN CONSTITUTION PETITION NO.9 OF 2005 AND CIVIL MISC. APPLICATIONS NO.1939 OF 2014, 5959 OF 2016, 4095, 1793, 2876, 2996, 3014 AND 6672 OF 2018 IN CONSTITUTION PETITION NO.134 OF 2012 AND CIVIL MISC. APPLICATIONS NO.3034, 3048, 3051 AND 6247 OF 2018 IN CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION NO.1864 OF 2010 Const.P.134/2012: Pakistan Bar Council through its Chairman v. Federal Government through Establishment Division and others C.M.A.1864/2010: Article by Aredshir Cowasjee in Daily Dawn dated 27.06.2010 titled “Looking the Future” regarding standards of professional ethics in the legal profession. C.M.A.1939/2014: Application by Pakistan Bar Council for Impleading Universities as respondents. C.M.A.5959/2016: Application in Respect of Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto University of Law (SZABUL) through its Registrar v. Federal Government through Establishment Division and others C.M.A.1793/2018: Impleadment application by Muhammad Amin Sandhila C.M.A.2876/2018: Concise Statement by KPK Law Colleges in reply to show cause notices issued vide order dated 6.3.2018. C.M.A.2996/2018: Impleadment application by Pakistan Bar Council through Chairman Legal Education Committee v. The Federal Government thr. Secretary Establishment and others C.M.A.3014/2018: Impleadment application by Islamabad Bar Council C.M.A.3034/2018: Concise Statement on behalf of respondent No.2 College of Legal & Ethical Studies (Coles), Abbottabad.
    [Show full text]
  • LLM 2006.Pdf
    CURRICULUM OF LL.M. (Revised 2006) N HIGH MISSIO ER COM EDUCATION HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION ISLAMABAD 1 CURRICULUM DIVISION, HEC Prof. Dr. Syed Altaf Hussain Member (Acad/R&D) Prof. Dr. Altaf Ali G. Shaikh Adviser (Acad/R&D) Malik Ghulam Abbas Deputy Director Miss Ghayyur Fatima Deputy Director (Curri) Mr. M. Tahir Ali Shah Assistant Director Mr. Shafiullah Khan Assistant Director Composed by Mr. Zulfiqar Ali, HEC Islamabad 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 7 2. Curriculum for LL.M. i) Title of Courses 10 ii) Details of Courses 11 3 PREFACE Curriculum of a subject is said to be the throbbing pulse of a nation. By looking at the curriculum one can judge the state of intellectual development and the state of progress of the nation. The world has turned into a global village; new ideas and information are pouring in like a stream. It is, therefore, imperative to update our curricula regularly by introducing the recent developments in the relevant fields of knowledge. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Federal Supervision of Curricula Textbooks and Maintenance of Standards of Education Act 1976, the Federal Government vide notification no. D773/76-JEA (Cur.), dated December 4, 1976, appointed University Grants Commission as the competent authority to look after the curriculum revision work beyond class XII at bachelor level and onwards to all degrees, certificates and diplomas awarded by degree colleges, universities and other institutions of higher education. In pursuance of the above decisions and directives, the Higher Education Commission (HEC) is continually performing curriculum revision in collaboration with universities.
    [Show full text]