Dying for Equal Protection

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dying for Equal Protection Hastings Law Journal Volume 71 Issue 3 Article 2 4-2020 Dying for Equal Protection Teri Dobbins Baxter Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Teri Dobbins Baxter, Dying for Equal Protection, 71 HASTINGS L.J. 535 (2020). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol71/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles Dying for Equal Protection † TERI DOBBINS BAXTER When health policy experts noticed that health outcomes for African Americans were consistently worse than those of their White counterparts, many in the health care community assumed that the poor outcomes could be blamed on poverty and lifestyle choices. Subsequent research told a different story. Studies repeatedly showed that neither money, nor marriage, nor educational achievement protect African American men, women, or children from poor health. Instead, the disparities were more likely explained by racism. Specifically, multiple studies have shown that experiencing racism has been linked to increased infant and maternal mortality rates, elevated stress levels, and an increased risk of numerous diseases, including cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure, and breast cancer. Mounting evidence makes it clear that health disparities cannot be eliminated simply by changes in diet or socioeconomic status; it requires eliminating racism and building a more just society. A just society starts with a just government, but racially-biased government policies and practices have existed since the founding of our country and have had—and continue to have—a direct and devastating impact on the health of African American individuals and communities. This Article traces the racially discriminatory laws and policies enacted or tolerated by state and federal governments in America from colonial times to the present—including slavery, Black Codes, convict leasing, lynching, segregation, and discriminatory policing—and links that racism to poorer health outcomes for African Americans. It concludes by discussing the need for criminal justice and social reforms to explicitly consider their impact on the health of the African American community. † Williford Gragg Distinguished Professor, University of Tennessee College of Law; B.A., J.D. Duke University. The author thanks Professor Eliza Fink for her invaluable research assistance, and Professors Zack Buck, Michael Higdon, and David Wolitz for their helpful comments on a draft of this Article. [535] 536 HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 71:535 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 537 I. HEALTH DISPARITIES AND THEIR CAUSES IDENTIFIED ............................ 540 A. HEALTH DISPARITIES IDENTIFIED ................................................ 540 B. RACISM AS A CAUSE OF HEALTH DISPARITIES ............................ 541 II. GOVERNMENTS’ FAILURE TO PROTECT AFRICAN AMERICANS BEFORE AND IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE CIVIL WAR ........................................ 546 A. NO LEGAL DUTY TO PROTECT: RACISM FROM COLONIAL TIMES THROUGH THE CIVIL WAR ................................................ 547 B. FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RATIFICATION AND THE SUPREME COURT’S RESTRICTIVE INTERPRETATION .................................... 548 1. History and Purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment ............. 549 2. The Supreme Court’s Narrow Interpretation Limits the Effectiveness the of the Fourteenth Amendment .................... 552 III. STATE-TOLERATED AND STATE-SPONSORED RACISM FROM RECONSTRUCTION THROUGH THE CIVIL RIGHTS ERA ........................ 558 A. BLACK CODES .............................................................................. 559 B. CONVICT LEASING ....................................................................... 560 C. LYNCHING .................................................................................... 562 D. RACIALIZED CAPITAL PUNISHMENT ............................................ 569 E. RACISM IN HOUSING .................................................................... 572 IV. THE CIVIL RIGHTS ERA ......................................................................... 574 V. GOVERNMENT DISCRIMINATION CONTINUES TO DRIVE HEALTH DISPARITIES ......................................................................................... 577 A. POLICING IN SCHOOLS: THE SCHOOL-TO-PRISON PIPELINE ......... 578 B. OVER-POLICING IN AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITIES: THE WAR ON DRUGS AND STOP-AND-FRISK ....................................... 579 C. DEADLY REACTIONS TO UNREASONABLE FEAR .......................... 583 D. DISCRIMINATION IN HEALTHCARE SETTINGS .............................. 584 VI. THE NEED FOR JUST GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND HEALTH- CONSCIOUS REFORMS ......................................................................... 585 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................... 587 April 2020] DYING FOR EQUAL PROTECTION 537 INTRODUCTION When health policy experts noticed that health outcomes for African Americans were consistently worse than those of their White counterparts, many in the health care community assumed that the poor outcomes could be blamed on poverty and lifestyle choices.1 Early efforts to eliminate the disparities focused on education, building stable two-parent families, and economic success, but the disparities persisted. Subsequent studies repeatedly showed that neither money, nor marriage, nor educational achievement protect African American men, women, or children from poor health.2 In fact, a high income and educational attainment sometimes increased their health risks.3 Instead, researchers found that the disparities were more likely explained in significant part by racism.4 Specifically, multiple studies have shown that being the victim of racial discrimination and witnessing others of the same race who are targets of racism negatively impacts the health of racial minorities, especially African Americans.5 Experiencing racism has been linked to increased infant and maternal mortality rates,6 elevated stress levels, and an increased risk of numerous diseases, including cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure, and breast cancer.7 This evidence makes it clear that health disparities cannot be eliminated simply by changes in habits or socioeconomic status; it requires eliminating racism and building a more just society. But eliminating (or even reducing) racism and racism-related stress requires an understanding of how racism has been fostered and perpetuated in our society. Racism is not harbored and spread solely by individuals. Racially-biased government policies and practices have existed since the founding of our country and have had—and continue to have—a direct and devastating impact on the health of African American individuals and communities. Beginning in colonial times, state and federal governments supported slavery. The physical and emotional trauma associated with being treated as chattel, and the lack of access to healthcare (unless it benefitted the slave owner) marked the beginning of racial health disparities in America.8 Even after the Civil War and ratification of 1. See, e.g., DAYNA BOWEN MATTHEW, JUST MEDICINE: A CURE FOR RACIAL INEQUALITY IN AMERICAN HEALTH CARE 1 (2015) (“[I]t is popular to blame the poor for their poor health by pointing to risky health behaviors.”); see also infra Subpart I.B. 2. MATTHEW, supra note 1, at 1 (“[R]acial and ethnic differences in health treatment and outcomes persist in multiple studies even after controlling for differences in insurance status, income, education, geography, and socioeconomic status.”) (footnote omitted). 3. See IMARI Z. SMITH ET AL., FIGHTING AT BIRTH: ERADICATING THE BLACK-WHITE INFANT MORTALITY GAP 4 (2018) (noting that the infant mortality rate is highest among African American women with doctorate or professional degrees). 4. See infra Subpart I.C. 5. See, e.g., SMITH ET AL., supra note 3, at 4, 6. 6. See David R. Williams & Selina A. Mohammed, Discrimination and Racial Disparities in Health: Evidence and Needed Research, 32 J. BEHAV. MED. 20, 20–21 (2009); see also infra Subpart I.B. 7. Williams & Mohammed, supra note 6, at 27–38; see infra Subpart I.B. 8. MATTHEW, supra note 1, at 10 (describing how conditions of slavery and discrimination impacted the health of slaves). 538 HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 71:535 the Fourteenth Amendment, the federal government continued to tolerate racist policies targeting African Americans. Laws such as Black Codes limited economic opportunities for African Americans and ensured continuing poverty and lack of access to quality care.9 And although the Fourteenth Amendment requires equal protection of the laws, for many decades Congress and the states failed to pass or enforce laws that would have provided protection against racially-motivated violence, including the thousands of lynchings that took place after the end of the Civil War and into the first half of the twentieth century.10 Lynchings not only cut short the lives of so many African Americans, they also served to terrorize entire communities with the knowledge that African Americans could be
Recommended publications
  • Twin Cities Public Television, Slavery by Another Name
    Narrative Section of a Successful Application The attached document contains the grant narrative and selected portions of a previously funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model, but to give you a sense of how a successful application may be crafted. Every successful application is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the Public Programs application guidelines at http://www.neh.gov/grants/public/americas-media-makers-production-grants for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Public Programs staff well before a grant deadline. Note: The attachment only contains the grant narrative and selected portions, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: Slavery By Another Name Institution: Twin Cities Public Television, Inc. Project Director: Catherine Allan Grant Program: America’s Media Makers: Production Grants 1100 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Rm. 426, Washington, D.C. 20506 P 202.606.8269 F 202.606.8557 E [email protected] www.neh.gov SLAVERY BY ANOTHER NAME NARRATIVE A. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Twin Cities Public Television requests a production grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) for a multi-platform initiative entitled Slavery by Another Name based upon the 2008 Pulitzer Prize-winning book written by Wall Street Journal reporter Douglas Blackmon. Slavery by Another Name recounts how in the years following the Civil War, insidious new forms of forced labor emerged in the American South, keeping hundreds of thousands of African Americans in bondage, trapping them in a brutal system that would persist until the onset of World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery by Another Name History Background
    Slavery by Another Name History Background By Nancy O’Brien Wagner, Bluestem Heritage Group Introduction For more than seventy-five years after the Emancipation Proclamation and the end of the Civil War, thousands of blacks were systematically forced to work against their will. While the methods of forced labor took on many forms over those eight decades — peonage, sharecropping, convict leasing, and chain gangs — the end result was a system that deprived thousands of citizens of their happiness, health, and liberty, and sometimes even their lives. Though forced labor occurred across the nation, its greatest concentration was in the South, and its victims were disproportionately black and poor. Ostensibly developed in response to penal, economic, or labor problems, forced labor was tightly bound to political, cultural, and social systems of racial oppression. Setting the Stage: The South after the Civil War After the Civil War, the South’s economy, infrastructure, politics, and society were left completely destroyed. Years of warfare had crippled the South’s economy, and the abolishment of slavery completely destroyed what was left. The South’s currency was worthless and its financial system was in ruins. For employers, workers, and merchants, this created many complex problems. With the abolishment of slavery, much of Southern planters’ wealth had disappeared. Accustomed to the unpaid labor of slaves, they were now faced with the need to pay their workers — but there was little cash available. In this environment, intricate systems of forced labor, which guaranteed cheap labor and ensured white control of that labor, flourished. For a brief period after the conclusion of fighting in the spring of 1865, Southern whites maintained control of the political system.
    [Show full text]
  • From Yellow Peril to Model Minority : ǂb Deconstruction of the Model Minority Myth and Implications for the Invisibility of Asian American Mental Health Needs
    Smith ScholarWorks Theses, Dissertations, and Projects 2017 From yellow peril to model minority : ǂb deconstruction of the model minority myth and implications for the invisibility of Asian American mental health needs Lynda Anne Moy Smith College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.smith.edu/theses Part of the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Moy, Lynda Anne, "From yellow peril to model minority : ǂb deconstruction of the model minority myth and implications for the invisibility of Asian American mental health needs" (2017). Masters Thesis, Smith College, Northampton, MA. https://scholarworks.smith.edu/theses/1909 This Masters Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations, and Projects by an authorized administrator of Smith ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lynda Anne Moy From Yellow Peril to Model Minority: Deconstruction of the Model Minority Myth and Implications for the Invisibility of Asian American Mental Health Needs ABSTRACT The model minority myth is a racial stereotype imposed upon Asian Americans, often depicting them as a successful and high-achieving monolithic group in the United States. This paper examines sociopolitical functions of the term “model minority” and implications for this broad and diverse racial group by reviewing existing literature and conducting an analysis of qualitative interviews with 12 Asian Americans. The findings of this study suggest that while the model minority myth appears to be a positive stereotype, it may lead Asian Americans to experience distress through (a.) a sense of confinement, (b.) treatment as foreigners, and (c.) erasure and invisibility of challenges around identity, racism and discrimination, immigrant and refugee experiences, mental health, and accessing culturally sensitive resources.
    [Show full text]
  • 1921 Tulsa Race Riot Reconnaissance Survey
    1921 Tulsa Race Riot Reconnaissance Survey Final November 2005 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Summary Statement 1 Bac.ground and Purpose 1 HISTORIC CONTEXT 5 National Persp4l<live 5 1'k"Y v. f~u,on' World War I: 1896-1917 5 World W~r I and Postw~r ( r.: 1!1t7' EarIV 1920,; 8 Tulsa RaCR Riot 14 IIa<kground 14 TI\oe R~~ Riot 18 AIt. rmath 29 Socilot Political, lind Economic Impa<tsJRamlt;catlon, 32 INVENTORY 39 Survey Arf!a 39 Historic Greenwood Area 39 Anla Oubi" of HiOlorK G_nwood 40 The Tulsa Race Riot Maps 43 Slirvey Area Historic Resources 43 HI STORIC GREENWOOD AREA RESOURCeS 7J EVALUATION Of NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE 91 Criteria for National Significance 91 Nalional Signifiunce EV;1lu;1tio.n 92 NMiol\ill Sionlflcao<e An.aIYS;s 92 Inl~ri ly E~alualion AnalY'is 95 {"",Iu,ion 98 Potenl l~1 M~na~menl Strategies for Resource Prote<tion 99 PREPARERS AND CONSULTANTS 103 BIBUOGRAPHY 105 APPENDIX A, Inventory of Elltant Cultural Resoun:es Associated with 1921 Tulsa Race Riot That Are Located Outside of Historic Greenwood Area 109 Maps 49 The African American S«tion. 1921 51 TI\oe Seed. of c..taotrophe 53 T.... Riot Erupt! SS ~I,.,t Blood 57 NiOhl Fiohlino 59 rM Inva.ion 01 iliad. TIll ... 61 TM fighl for Standp''''' Hill 63 W.II of fire 65 Arri~.. , of the Statl! Troop< 6 7 Fil'lal FiOlrtino ~nd M~,,;~I I.IIw 69 jii INTRODUCTION Summary Statement n~sed in its history.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Massacre of 1871?
    CURRICULUM PROJECT HISTORICAL INQUIRY QUESTION What were the causes of the Anti- Chinese Massacre of 1871? LOST LA EPISODE Wild West What were the causes of the Anti- Chinese Massacre of 1871? Author of Lesson Miguel Sandoval Animo Pat Brown Charter High [email protected] Content Standards 11.2.2: Describe the changing landscape, including the growth of cities linked by industry and trade, and the development of cities divided according to race, ethnicity and class. CCSS Standards CCSS.ELA-READING FOR LITERACY IN HISTORY.RH.11-12.9: Integrate information from diverse sources, both primary and secondary, into a coherent understanding of an idea or event, noting discrepancies among sources. CCSS.ELA-READING FOR LITERACY IN HISTORY.RH.11-12.2: Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary that makes clear the relationships among the key details and ideas. CCSS.ELA-READING FOR LITERACY IN HISTORY.RH.11-12.3: Evaluate various explanations for actions or events and determine which explanation best accords with textual evidence, acknowledging where the text leaves matters uncertain. CCSS. ELA-WRITING FOR LITERACY IN HISTORY. WHST.11-12.1a.b.e: Introduce precise, knowledgeable claim(s), establish the significance of the claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that logically sequences the claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly and thoroughly, supplying the most relevant data and evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both claim(s) and counterclaims in a discipline-appropriate form that anticipates the audience’s knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Cartels
    Michigan Journal of Race and Law Volume 16 2010 Racial Cartels Daria Roithmayr University of Southern California Gould School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Public Law and Legal Theory Commons Recommended Citation Daria Roithmayr, Racial Cartels, 16 MICH. J. RACE & L. 45 (2010). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol16/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Race and Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RACIAL CARTELS Daria Roithmayr* This Article argues that we can better understand the dynamic of historical racial exclusion if we describe it as the anti-competitive work of "racial cartels." We can define racial cartels to include a range of all-White groups-homeowners' associations, school districts, trade unions, real estate boards and political parties- who gained signficant social, economic and political profit from excluding on the basis of race. Farfrom operating on the basis of irrational animus, racial cartels actually derived significant profit from racial exclusion. By creating racially segmented housing markets, for example, exclusive White homeowners' associations enjoyed higher property values that depended not just on the superior quality of the housing stock but also on the racial composition of the neighborhood.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 12 18 Pickett V Cleveland Complaint
    Case: 1:19-cv-02911 Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/18/19 1 of 39. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ALBERT PICKETT, JR., KEYONNA Case No. JOHNSON, JAROME MONTGOMERY, ODESSA PARKS, and TINIYA SHEPHERD Judge: (f/k/a TINIYA HALL), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, Jury Trial Demanded v. CITY OF CLEVELAND, Defendant. Plaintiffs Albert Pickett, Jr., Keyonna Johnson, Jarome Montgomery, Odessa Parks, and Tiniya Shepherd (f/k/a Tiniya Hall), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), bring this civil rights class action seeking to remedy Defendant City of Cleveland’s (“Cleveland” or “the City”) violations of the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.; the U.S. Constitution, Amendment XIV, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the Ohio Constitution, Article I, § XVI; and the Ohio Civil Rights Act, Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 4112.02(H). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. Water is life: it is essential for health, hygiene, cooking, and cleaning. In and around Cleveland, however, water has put residents—disproportionately those who are Black—at risk of losing their homes due to the City’s draconian policy of placing liens on properties with overdue water bills. The lack of water—through unaffordable and often erroneous bills that lead to rampant service shutoffs—also impacts thousands of Cleveland residents every year. 1 Case: 1:19-cv-02911 Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/18/19 2 of 39. PageID #: 2 2. Black residents of Cleveland have faced housing challenges for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO the Penitentiary at Richmond
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The Penitentiary at Richmond: Slavery, State Building, and Labor in the South’s First State Prison A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Hilary Louise Coulson Committee in charge: Professor Rebecca Jo Plant, Chair Professor Stephen D. Cox Professor Mark Hanna Professor Mark Hendrickson Professor Rachel Klein 2016 Copyright Hilary Louise Coulson, 2016 All Rights Reserved The Dissertation of Hilary Louise Coulson is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2016 iii DEDICATION For my parents, Richard and Laura Coulson who always believed I could, and for my husband, Frank Fernandez, who helped me prove it. iv EPIGRAPH “You know we don’t have our prisons like yours of the North, like grand palaces with flower-yards.” –Keeper of the Virginia Penitentiary, c. 1866 v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ............................................................................................... iii Dedication ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Right to Housing
    THE RIGHT TO HOUSING If a person has a low opinion of himselfand is unhappy because he lives in a filthy, dilapidated,rat-infested house, you cannot tell him to apply positive thinking-and "Be Happy!" Happiness will begin to blossom only when he finds a way to get out of his physical trap into improved surroundings. Harold Cruse* I. INTRODUCTION Housing is basic to human survival. When properly constructed and maintained, it provides an essential element for life: shelter from the forces of nature. The 1949 Housing Act' recognized the importance of housing by enunciating the national goal of a "decent home and a suitable living envi- ronment for every American family." The impact of housing quality on so- cietal well being is undeniable. For example, the quality and character of the family living unit significantly affects the nature of organized family life.2 Moreover, poor housing has been shown to cause mental and physical illness and is a contributing factor to the cause of crime.3 The demonstrated importance of housing quality supports the assertion that the right to habitable housing is a personal interest which is "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty"4 and thereby deserving of constitutional pro- tection. Yet, in Lindsey v. Normet5 the Supreme Court held that access to housing of a particular quality is not a fundamental interest which requires application of a strict standard of review under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Thus, governmental action which curtails a person's ability to obtain habitable housing need only bear a rational rela- tionship to a permissible governmental objective.6 Because the range of per- missible governmental objectives is broad, a rational relationship can usually be established and a challenged governmental action upheld.7 * H.
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Housing for Regional and Municipal Planning a Guidebook for New Hampshire Planners
    Fair Housing for Regional and Municipal Planning A Guidebook for New Hampshire Planners April 2014 FAIR HOUSING for REGIONAL and MUNICIPAL PLANNING A Guidebook for New Hampshire Planners New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority Board of Directors Stephen W. Ensign, Chair Amy L. Lockwood New London Concord Kenneth N. Ortmann, Vice Chair Mary Beth Rudolph Rochester Madbury Kendall Buck Stephanye Schuyler Wilmot Portsmouth John A. Cuddy Michael J. Toomey Freedom Laconia Pauline Ikawa Manchester The production of this guidebook was supported by HUD Community Challenge Planning Grant No. FR-5500-N-33. April 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER TWO The Federal Fair Housing Act ................................................................................................ 3 History of the Fair Housing Act .......................................................................................... 3 Purpose of the Fair Housing Act ......................................................................................... 3 Enforcement of the Fair Housing Act ................................................................................. 3 Key Features of the Fair Housing Act ................................................................................ 4 Protected Classes .......................................................................................................... 4 New Hampshire’s Three
    [Show full text]
  • Publicity and the De-Legitimation of Lynching∗
    \Judge Lynch" in the Court of Public Opinion: Publicity and the De-legitimation of Lynching∗ Michael Weaver Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Political Science University of British Columbiay [email protected] November 8, 2018 Abstract How does violence become publicly unacceptable? I address this question in the context of lynching in United States. Between 1880 and the 1930s, public discourse about lynching moved from open or tacit endorsement to widespread condemnation. I argue this occurred because of increasing publicity for lynchings. While locals justified nearby lynchings, publicity exposed lynching to distant, un-supportive audiences and allowed African Americans to safely articulate counter-narratives and condemnations. I test this argument using data on lynchings, rail networks, and newspaper coverage of lynchings in millions of issues across thousands of newspapers. I find that lynchings in counties with greater access to publicity (via rail networks) saw more and geographically dispersed coverage, that distant coverage was more critical, and that increased risk of media exposure may have reduced the incidence of lynching. I discuss how publicity could be a mechanism for strengthening or weakening justifications of violence in other contexts. ∗I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers, Gareth Nellis, Elisabeth Wood, Vesla Weaver, Steven Wilkinson, Nikhar Gaikwad, as well as participants in the Yale Comparative Politics Workshop, the 2015 Politics and History conference, the 2015 American Political Science Association conference, and the 2015 Berkeley Electoral Violence conference for helpful comments and advice. I would also like to thank my research assistants|Nina Shirole, Bahja Alammari, Emily Beatty, Andi Jordan, Emil Lauritsen, Emma Lodge, and Arian Zand|for their invaluable work on this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Exclusion and Tong Wars in Portland, Oregon
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 12-2019 More Than Hatchetmen: Chinese Exclusion and Tong Wars in Portland, Oregon Brenda M. Horrocks Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Horrocks, Brenda M., "More Than Hatchetmen: Chinese Exclusion and Tong Wars in Portland, Oregon" (2019). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7671. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7671 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MORE THAN HATCHETMEN: CHINESE EXCLUSION AND TONG WARS IN PORTLAND, OREGON by Brenda M. Horrocks A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History Approved: ______________________ ____________________ Colleen O’Neill, Ph.D. Angela Diaz, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member ______________________ ____________________ Li Guo, Ph.D. Richard S. Inouye, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice Provost for Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2019 ii Copyright © Brenda Horrocks All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT More Than Hatchetmen: Chinese Exclusion and Tong Wars in Portland, Oregon by Brenda M. Horrocks, Master of Arts Utah State University, 2019 Major Professor: Dr. Colleen O’Neill Department: History During the middle to late nineteenth century, Chinese immigration hit record levels in the United States. This led to the growth of Chinatowns across the West Coast.
    [Show full text]